Prognostic significance of hMLH1/hMSH2 gene mutations and hMLH1 promoter methylation in sporadic colorectal cancer. Med Oncol. 2014;31:39. [PMID: 24990217 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-014-0039-z]

Real-time amplification and high resolution melt analysis on a rapid microfluidic instrument

BACKGROUND

Real-time nucleic acid amplification represents a robust, ubiquitous technology that often requires additional downstream analysis to identify sequence polymorphisms or differentiate specific from non-specific amplification (NSA). For example, common post-amplification analysis methods for the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) include sequencing and electrophoresis, both of which are labor- and time-intensive techniques that require expensive additional reagents and consumables. In contrast, high resolution melt (HRM) analysis presents a simpler alternative that can elucidate sequence differences and distinguish specific from non-specific amplification without requiring separate instrumentation or additional reagents beyond those used for real-time amplification.

RESULTS

We have previously reported a microfluidic real-time amplification system that could complete PCR in 8 minutes with comparable sensitivity to conventional instruments that require 50+ minutes for the same assay. Here, we describe expanding the capability of the system to include post-amplification HRM analysis. Sequence differentiation was demonstrated using PCR to detect epigenetic targets with different methylation percentages. Moreover, isothermal amplification methods that commonly experience NSA due to excessive primer noise, including loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) and recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA), were coupled with HRM to distinguish true positive results. All microfluidic experiments were completed in parallel on conventional benchtop instrumentation, the results of which were found to be comparable with the microfluidic system consuming a fraction of the total analysis time required on the conventional instrument.

SIGNIFICANCE

With these modifications, the microfluidic platform, which has demonstrated 8 minute PCR, can perform HRM in under 4 minutes following amplification for differentiation of sequences containing mutations and elucidating NSA. We demonstrate enhanced applicability of this microfluidic instrument for point-of-need applications, including clinical diagnostics, where rapid and accurate genomic analysis is paramount.

MLH1 Methylation Status and Microsatellite Instability in Patients with Colorectal Cancer

Background/Objectives: The purpose of the current study was to compare the methylation of five regions of the CpG island of MLH1 with the presence of microsatellite instability (MSI) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Methods: The study analyzed 138 CRC tumor samples. DNA extraction was performed, followed by bisulfite conversion. MLH1 gene methylation was assessed by methylation-specific PCR (MS-PCR), and the resulting fragments were analyzed using polyacrylamide gels. MSI was evaluated using multiplex PCR, and the fragments were run through capillary electrophoresis. R studio (v4.4.1) and SPSS (v29.0) software were used for the statistical analysis, and values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: The study showed 75.4% unmethylated, 21% partially methylated, and 3.6% fully methylated samples, with region A frequently methylated. MSI was observed in 7.2% of cases (MSI-H: 5.8%, MSI-L: 1.4%). BAT-26 was the most unstable marker. A significant difference between MLH1 methylation and MSI-H (p < 0.01) was identified, but there was no relationship with specific MLH1 regions. Conclusions: No differences were identified when analyzing specific methylation regions in relation to MSI. This study is the first to describe MSI frequency in Mexican patients regardless of age.

Large-scale external validation and meta-analysis of gene methylation biomarkers in tumor tissue for colorectal cancer prognosis

BACKGROUND

DNA methylation biomarkers in colorectal cancer (CRC) tissue hold potential as prognostic indicators. However, individual studies have yielded heterogeneous results, and external validation is largely absent. We conducted a comprehensive external validation and meta-analysis of previously suggested gene methylation biomarkers for CRC prognosis.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search to identify relevant studies investigating gene methylation biomarkers for CRC prognosis until March 2024. Our external validation cohort with long-term follow-up included 2303 patients with CRC from 22 hospitals in southwest Germany. We used Cox regression analyses to assess associations between previously suggested gene methylation biomarkers and prognosis, adjusting for clinical variables. We calculated pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using random-effects models.

FINDINGS

Of 151 single gene and 29 multiple gene methylation biomarkers identified from 121 studies, 37 single gene and seven multiple gene biomarkers were significantly associated with CRC prognosis after adjustment for clinical variables. Moreover, the directions of these associations with prognosis remained consistent between the original studies and our validation analyses. Seven single biomarkers and two multi-biomarker signatures were significantly associated with CRC prognosis in the meta-analysis, with a relatively strong level of evidence for CDKN2A, WNT5A, MLH1, and EVL.

INTERPRETATION

In a comprehensive evaluation of the so far identified gene methylation biomarkers for CRC prognosis, we identified candidates with potential clinical relevance for further investigation.

FUNDING

The German Research Council, the Interdisciplinary Research Program of the National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Germany, the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research.

Methylation of WT1, CA10 in peripheral blood leukocyte is associated with breast cancer risk: a case-control study

Background

Studies have shown that abnormal changes of specific-gene DNA methylation in leukocytes may be associated with an elevated risk of cancer. However, associations between the methylation of the zinc-related genes, WT1 and CA10, and breast cancer risk remain unknown.

Methods

The methylation of WT1 and CA10 was analyzed by methylation-sensitive high-resolution-melting (MS-HRM) in a case-control study with female subjects (N = 959). Logistic regression was used to analyze the associations, and propensity score (PS) method was used to adjust confounders.

Results

The results showed that WT1 hypermethylation was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer, with an odds ratio (OR) of 3.07 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.67–5.64, P < 0.01]. Subgroup analyses showed that WT1 hypermethylation was specifically associated with an elevated risk of luminal A subtype (OR = 2.62, 95% CI: 1.11–6.20, P = 0.03) and luminal B subtype (OR = 3.23, 95% CI: 1.34–7.80, P = 0.01). CA10 hypermethylation was associated with an increased risk of luminal B subtype (OR = 1.80, 95% CI: 1.09–2.98, P = 0.02).

Conclusion

The results of the present study suggest that the hypermethylation of WT1 methylation in leukocytes is significantly associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. The hypermethylation of WT1 is associated with an increased risk of luminal subtypes of breast cancer, and the hypermethylation of CA10 is associated with an increased risk of luminal B subtype of breast cancer.

Copy number variation of ubiquitin- specific proteases genes in blood leukocytes and colorectal cancer

Ubiquitin-specific proteases (USPs) play important roles in the regulation of many cancer-related biological processes. USPs copy number variation (CNVs) may affect the risk and prognosis of colorectal cancer (CRC). We detected CNVs of USPs genes in 468 matched CRC patients and controls, estimated the associations between the USPs genes CNVs and CRC risk and prognosis and their interactions with environmental factors on CRC risk. Finally, we generated five CRC risk predictive models with different CNVs patterns combining with environmental factors (EF). We identified significant association between CYLD deletion and CRC risk (ORadj = 4.18, 95% CI: 2.03-8.62), significant association between USP9X amplification and CRC risk (ORadj = 2.30, 95% CI: 1.48-3.57), and significant association between USP11 deletion and CRC risk (ORadj = 3.49, 95% CI: 1.49-8.64). There were significant gene-environment and gene-gene interactions on CRC risk. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of EF + SIG (deletion of CYLD and USP11, amplification of USP9X) model was significantly larger than any other models (AUC = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.74-0.77). We did not identify significant associations between CNVs of the three genes and CRC prognosis. CNVs of CYLD, USP9X, and USP11 are significantly associated with the risk of CRC. Gene-gene and gene-environment interactions might also play an important role in the development of CRC.

Significant association of EED promoter hypomethylation with colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common and serious types of malignancy worldwide. The embryonic ectoderm development (EED) gene is important to maintain transcriptional repressive states of genes over successive cell generations. The present study aimed to investigate the association between EED methylation and CRC. A total of 111 CRC tissue samples, 111 paired para-tumor tissues and 20 colorectal normal tissues were obtained for EED methylation assay, which was performed using a quantitative methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction. The percentage of methylated reference was calculated to represent the DNA methylation level. A dual-luciferase reporter gene assay was used to detect the gene promoter activity of a EED fragment. The current results revealed a significant difference in the EED methylation levels among tumor, para-tumor and normal colorectal tissues (tumor vs. para-tumor vs. normal, 5.03±4.61 vs. 8.65±11.50 vs. 40.12±45.31; F=45.014; P<0.0001). The dual-luciferase reporter gene assay demonstrated that the transcriptional activity of recombinant pGL3-EED plasmid was significantly higher compared with that of the pGL3-Basic control vector (fold-change, 3.15; P=0.014), which suggests the EED fragment can promote gene expression. In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that EED hypomethylation may be an important factor associated with CRC.

Prognostic Value of Mismatch Repair Genes for Patients With Colorectal Cancer: Meta-Analysis

DNA mismatch repair was proposed to play a pivotal role in the development and prognosis of colorectal cancer. However, the prognostic value of mismatch repair on colorectal cancer is still unknown. The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched. The articles about mismatch repair (including hMLH1, hMSH2, hMSH3, hMSH6, hPMSH1, and hPMSH2) deficiency for the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer were included in the study. The hazard ratio and its 95% confidence interval were used to measure the impact of mismatch repair deficiency on survival time. Twenty-one articles were included. The combined hazard ratio for mismatch repair deficiency on overall survival was 0.59 (95% confidence interval: 0.50-0.69) and that on disease-free survival was 0.57 (95% confidence interval: 0.43-0.75). In subgroup analysis, there were a significant association between overall survival and mismatch repair deficiency in Asian studies (hazard ratio: 0.67; 95% confidence interval: 0.50-0.91) and Western studies (hazard ratio: 0.56; 95% confidence interval: 0.46-0.67). For disease-free survival, the hazard ratios in Asian studies and Western studies were 0.55 (95% confidence interval: 0.38-0.81) and 0.62 (95% confidence interval: 0.50-0.78), respectively. Our meta-analysis indicated that mismatch repair could be used to evaluate the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer.

Hypomethylation of mismatch repair genes MLH1 and MSH2 is associated with chemotolerance of breast carcinoma: Clinical significance

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to understand the importance of mismatch repair genes MLH1 and MSH2 in chemotolerance and prognosis of breast carcinoma (BC).

METHODS

First, the alterations (deletion/methylation/expression) of MLH1 and MSH2 were analyzed in 45 neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT)-treated and 133 pretherapeutic BC samples. The chemotolerant BC cells were characterized by treating two BC cell lines MCF-7 and MDA MB 231 with two anthracycline antitumor antibiotics, doxorubicin and nogalamycin.

RESULTS

The deletion frequencies were 32% to 38% in MLH1/MSH2 genes and promoter methylation frequencies were 49% to 62% in MLH1 and 41% to 51% in MSH2 in both NACT-treated and pretherapeutic samples. The overall alteration of MLH1 and MSH2 was 58% to 71% in the samples. Reduced messenger RNA (mRNA) and protein expression were found in both the genes and it showed concordance with the molecular alterations. NACT-treated patients showed better prognosis. The chemotherapeutic drug induced increased mRNA/protein expression of the genes in BC cell lines was due to their promoter hypomethylation, as analyzed by quantitative methylation assay. This phenomenon was also evident in NACT-treated BC samples.

CONCLUSION

MLH1/MSH2 genes play a critical role in the development of BC. Hypomethylation of MLH1/MSH2 genes might be important in chemotolerance of the disease.

Prognostic DNA methylation markers for sporadic colorectal cancer: a systematic review

Background

Biomarkers that can predict the prognosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and that can stratify high-risk early stage patients from low-risk early stage patients are urgently needed for better management of CRC. During the last decades, a large variety of prognostic DNA methylation markers has been published in the literature. However, to date, none of these markers are used in clinical practice.

Methods

To obtain an overview of the number of published prognostic methylation markers for CRC, the number of markers that was validated independently, and the current level of evidence (LoE), we conducted a systematic review of PubMed, EMBASE, and MEDLINE. In addition, we scored studies based on the REMARK guidelines that were established in order to attain more transparency and complete reporting of prognostic biomarker studies. Eighty-three studies reporting on 123 methylation markers fulfilled the study entry criteria and were scored according to REMARK.

Results

Sixty-three studies investigated single methylation markers, whereas 20 studies reported combinations of methylation markers. We observed substantial variation regarding the reporting of sample sizes and patient characteristics, statistical analyses, and methodology. The median (range) REMARK score for the studies was 10.7 points (4.5 to 17.5) out of a maximum of 20 possible points. The median REMARK score was lower in studies, which reported a p value below 0.05 versus those, which did not (p = 0.005). A borderline statistically significant association was observed between the reported p value of the survival analysis and the size of the study population (p = 0.051). Only 23 out of 123 markers (17%) were investigated in two or more study series. For 12 markers, and two multimarker panels, consistent results were reported in two or more study series. For four markers, the current LoE is level II, for all other markers, the LoE is lower.

Conclusion

This systematic review reflects that adequate reporting according to REMARK and validation of prognostic methylation markers is absent in the majority of CRC methylation marker studies. However, this systematic review provides a comprehensive overview of published prognostic methylation markers for CRC and highlights the most promising markers that have been published in the last two decades.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13148-018-0461-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Application of transgenic animal models in colorectal cancer research

Due to the increasing incidence of colorectal cancer, the research in this area has been extensively carried out. So far, there have been about 30 kinds of transgenic animal models that are related to colorectal cancer. Compared to other animal models, transgenic animal models have showed more advantages in colorectal cancer research and have gradually become a hot spot in colorectal cancer research. This article will give an overview of conventional transgenic techniques and discuss the application of transgenic animal models in colorectal cancer research.