Microwave ablation of malignant renal tumours: intermediate-term results and usefulness of RENAL and mRENAL scores for predicting outcomes and complications

Comparative efficacy and safety of ablative therapies in the management of primary localised renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Non-invasive and minimally invasive ablative treatments, including stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, and cryoablation, have emerged as key treatment options for managing renal cell carcinoma, especially for patients who are unsuitable for surgery. We aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of these emerging treatment methods in patients with localised renal cell carcinoma.

METHODS

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, and the Cochrane Library for publications between Jan 1, 2000, and March 1, 2024. Eligible articles were observational studies and randomised controlled trials including at least five adult patients (age ≥18 years) with primary and localised renal cell carcinoma treated with SBRT, radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, or cryoablation and that reported on local control outcomes. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts and then full texts of eligible studies were independently evaluated by the same reviewers, with disagreements resolved via discussion or consultation with a third reviewer. Summary estimates were extracted from published reports manually using a standardised data extraction form. The primary endpoint was local control rate at 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years after start of treatment. A meta-analysis was conducted using a DerSimonian and Laird model to summarise local control rates. Publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots and Egger's test. We also recorded the frequency and severity of adverse events after treatment on the basis of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 5.0) and Clavien-Dindo complication index. The study protocol was prospectively registered with PROSPERO, CRD42024511840.

FINDINGS

We identified 6668 records, of which 330 were assessed via full-text review, and 133 were included in our systematic review and meta-analysis. The eligible studies included data for 8910 patients (mean age 67·9 years [SD 7·3], 2518 [31·4%] of 8018 patients with available data were female and 5500 [68·6%] were male). Local control rates for SBRT were 99% (95% CI 97-100; I2=6%) at 1 year, 97% (95-99; I2=0%) at 2 years, and 95% (89-98; I2=42%) at 5 years; for radiofrequency ablation were 96% (94-98; I2=73%) at 1 year, 95% (92-98; I2=77%) at 2 years, and 92% (88-96; I2=78%) at 5 years; for microwave ablation were 97% (95-99; I2=74%) at 1 year, 95% (92-98; I2=77%) at 2 years, and 86% (75-94; I2=66%) at 5 years; and for cryoablation were 95% (93-96; I2=61%) at 1 year, 94% (91-96; I2=69%) at 2 years, and 90% (87-93; I2=74%) at 5 years. The proportion of patients who reported grade 3-4 adverse events was 3% (121 of 3726) after cryoablation, 2% (39 of 2503) after radiofrequency ablation, 1% (22 of 2069) after microwave ablation, and 2% (11 of 612) after SBRT. Risk of bias was moderate in most studies (70 [53%] of 133) and no publication bias was observed.

INTERPRETATION

All investigated ablative methods continue to represent effective treatment choices in renal cell carcinoma, and these findings support multi-disciplinary discussions of these treatment methods, along with surgery and surveillance, to individualise treatment decisions in these patients. Future research should aim to conduct randomised controlled trials across larger patient populations to further elucidate the long-term oncological and survival outcomes associated with these treatments.

FUNDING

None.

Percutaneous microwave ablation of T1a renal cell carcinomas: A 10-year single-center retrospective review

INTRODUCTION

Partial nephrectomy is currently the preferred treatment option for T1a renal cell carcinomas (RCC), with nephron-sparing techniques, including microwave ablation, becoming more common in select patients. Primary aims are to document outcomes of microwave ablation for T1a RCCs in an Australian tertiary centre to add to the evidence for its safety and efficacy.

METHODS

The prospectively maintained Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital Interventional Radiology database was retrospectively searched for all Renal Microwave ablations completed between June 2012 and February 2022. This database and a combination of hospital programmes including Agfa Impax PACS, Bossnet digital medical record and iSoft Clinical Manager were used to extract the relevant data which was anonymized and entered into an Excel spreadsheet for analysis.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients underwent microwave ablation for 50 tumours. Of these, there were two local and two distant recurrences. A fifth patient had metastases on presentation. Higher local recurrence rates were associated with larger tumour size (P = 0.043). Tumour proximity to the collecting system <4 mm was associated with higher rates of complications (P = 0.020). RENAL scores did not show statistically significant correlation with complications (P = 0.092) or local or distant recurrence. Notably, the study follow-up time was longer than many comparative studies (mean = 2796, ~7.66 years censoring for death and mean = 832 days, ~2.28 years not censoring for death).

CONCLUSION

Consistent with the literature, this study further demonstrates that microwave ablation is a safe and efficacious option for treatment of T1a RCC.

Microwave ablation of 105 T1 renal tumors: technique efficacy with a mean follow-up of two years

BACKGROUND

Thermal ablation (TA) with radiofrequency (RFA) or cryoablation (CA) are established treatments for small renal masses (≤4 cm). Microwave ablation (MWA) has several potential benefits (decreased ablation time, less susceptibility to heat-sink, higher lesion temperatures than RFA) but is still considered experimental considering the available small-sample studies with short follow-up.

PURPOSE

To evaluate technique efficacy and complications of our initial experience of renal tumors treated using percutaneous MWA with a curative intent.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 105 renal tumors (in 93 patients) were treated between April 2014 and August 2017. MWA was performed percutaneously with computed tomography (CT) guidance under conscious sedation (n=82) or full anesthesia. Patients were followed with contrast-enhanced CT scans at six months and yearly thereafter for a minimum of five years. The mean follow-up time was 2.1 years. The percentage of tumors completely ablated in a single session (primary efficacy rate) and those successfully treated after repeat ablation (secondary efficacy rate) were recorded. Patient and tumor characteristics as well as complications were collected retrospectively.

RESULTS

The median patient age was 70 years and median tumor size was 25 mm. Primary efficacy rate was 96.2% (101/105 tumors). After including two residual tumors for a second ablation session, secondary efficacy was 97.1% (102/105). Periprocedural complications were found in 5.2% (5/95) sessions: four Clavien-Dindo I and one Clavien-Dindo IIIa. One postprocedural Clavien-Dindo II complication was found.

CONCLUSION

MWA has high efficacy rates and few complications compared to other TA methods at a mean follow-up of two years.

Computed tomography-guided percutaneous microwave ablation for renal cell carcinoma: evaluating the performance of nephrometry scores

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of the current study is to evaluate the performance of RENAL and mRENAL scores, in the prediction of oncological outcomes in patients treated with microwave ablation (MWA) for (T1) renal cell carcinomas (RCC).

METHODS

Institutional database retrospective research identified 76 patients with a biopsy-proven solitary T1a (84%) or T1b (16%) RCC; all patients underwent CT-guided MWA ablation. Tumor complexity was reviewed by calculating RENAL and mRENAL scores.

RESULTS

The majority of the lesions were exophytic (82.9%), with > 7 mm nearness to the collecting system (53.9%), located posteriorly (73.6%), and lower to polar lines (61.8%). Mean RENAL and mRENAL scores were 5.7 (SD = 1.9) and 6.1 (SD = 2.1) respectively. Progression rates were significantly higher with greater tumor size (> 4 cm), with < 4 mm nearness to the collecting system, for tumors crossing a polar line and with the anterior location. None of the above was associated with complications. RENAL and mRENAL scores were significantly higher in patients with incomplete ablation. The ROC analysis showed the significant prognostic ability of both RENAL and mRENAL scores for progression. In both scores, the optimal cut-off point was 6.5. Univariate Cox regression analysis for progression showed a hazard ratio of 7.73 for the RENAL score and 7.48 for the mRENAL score.

CONCLUSION

The results of the present study show that the risk of progression was higher in patients with RENAL and mRENAL score of > 6.5, in T1b tumors, close to the collective system (< 4 mm), crossing polar lines and anterior location.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

CT-guided percutaneous MWA is a safe and effective technique for the treatment of T1a renal cell carcinomas. Different morphometric parameters of RCC tumors including RENAL and mRENAL score > 6.5, size, proximity to the collecting system, and crossing of polar lines impact the efficacy of MWA and progression survival rates.

KEY POINTS

• The risk of progression is higher in patients with RENAL and mRENAL score > 6.5, in T1b tumors, close to the collective system (< 4 mm), crossing polar lines and anterior location. • The significant prognostic ability of the mRENAL score for progression was higher than the respective of the RENAL score. • Complications were not associated with any of the above factors.

Limited ability of the renal ablation-specific (MC)2 risk scoring system to predict major adverse events from percutaneous renal microwave ablation

PURPOSE

To access if the (MC)2 scoring system can identify patients at risk for major adverse events following percutaneous microwave ablation of renal tumors.

METHODS

Retrospective review of all adult patients who underwent percutaneous renal microwave ablation at two centers. Patient demographics, medical histories, laboratory work, technical details of the procedure, tumor characteristics, and clinical outcomes were collected. The (MC)2 score was calculated for each patient. Patients were assigned to low-risk (<5), moderate-risk (5-8) and high-risk (>8) groups. Adverse events were graded according to the criteria from the Society of Interventional Radiology guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 116 patients (mean age = 67.8 [95%CI 65.5-69.9], 66 men) were included. 10 (8.6%) and 22 (19.0%) experienced major or minor adverse events, respectively. The mean (MC)2 score for patients with major adverse events (4.6 [95%CI 3.3-5.8]) was not higher than those with either minor adverse events (4.1 [95%CI 3.4-4.8], p = 0.49) or no adverse events (3.7 [95%CI 3.4-4.1], p = 0.25). However, mean tumor size was greater in those with major adverse events (3.1 cm [95%CI 2.0-4.1]) than minor adverse events (2.0 cm [95%CI 1.8-2.3], p = 0.01). Patients with central tumors were also more likely to experience major adverse events compared to those without central tumors (p = 0.02). The area under the receiver operator curve to predict major adverse events was 0.61 (p = 0.15), indicating a poor ability of the (MC)2 score to predict major adverse events.

CONCLUSION

The (MC)2 risk scoring system does not accurately identify patients at risk for major adverse events from percutaneous microwave ablation of renal tumors. The mean tumor size and central tumor location may serve as a better indicator for risk assessment of major adverse events.

Radiofrequency Ablation, Cryoablation, and Microwave Ablation for the Treatment of Small Renal Masses: Efficacy and Complications

Over the last two decades the detection rate of small renal masses has increased, due to improving diagnostic accuracy, and nephron-sparing treatments have become the first-choice curative option for small renal masses. As a minimally invasive alternative, thermal ablation has increased in popularity, offering a good clinical outcome and low recurrence rate. Radiofrequency ablation, Cryoablation, and Microwave ablation are the main ablative techniques. All of them are mostly overlapping in term of cancer specific free survival and outcomes. These techniques require imaging study to assess lesions features and to plan the procedure: US, CT, and both of them together are the leading guidance alternatives. Imaging findings guide the interventional radiologist in assessing the risk of complication and possible residual disease after procedure. The purpose of this review is to compare different ablative modalities and different imaging guides, underlining the effectiveness, outcomes, and complications related to each of them, in order to assist the interventional radiologist in choosing the best option for the patient.

Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Thermal Ablation of Renal Cancers-In Search for the Ideal Tumour

Over the recent years, the progress in imaging techniques has led to an increased detection of kidney tumours, including small renal masses. While surgery is still the standard of care, there is a growing interest in minimally invasive methods. Ultrasound (US)-guided percutaneous ablation is particularly attractive because it is a safe and relatively simple procedure. In this study, we investigated the success of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in relation to kidney tumour diameter and location. Between August 2016 and September 2021, 253 patients with 259 renal tumours underwent US-guided RFA as a primary treatment in our institution. A total of 67 patients were excluded from this study. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) and tumour biopsy were performed before the procedure. Patients were followed with contrast-enhanced CT, the average follow-up time was 28 months. The studied group was composed of 186 patients with 191 renal tumours-only biopsy-confirmed renal cancers were included. During the follow-up, 46 cases of residual disease and 4 cases of local progression were found. There was a significant correlation between tumour size and the ablation success rate. The success rate was 73.5% and 87.6% for lesions ≤25 mm, 94.6% for lesions ≤25 mm and exophytic, 79.1% for lesions 26-30 mm and 84.4% for lesions 26-30 mm and exophytic, respectively. Four Clavien-Dindo grade ≥2 complications were observed. US-guided percutaneous RFA of T1a renal cancers is safe and well-tolerated. Its effectiveness depends on tumour size, with best results for exophytic lesions smaller than 3 cm. Most of the recurrent or residual tumours can be successfully re-treated with US-guided percutaneous RFA.

Utility of the RENAL Nephrometry Scoring System in Predicting Adverse Events and Outcomes of Percutaneous Microwave Ablation of Renal Tumors

PURPOSE

To assess the utility of the radius, exophytic/endophytic, nearness to collecting system or sinus, anterior/posterior, and location relative to polar lines (RENAL) nephrometry scoring system at predicting adverse events and outcomes in percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) of renal tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of 116 patients who underwent MWA from 2004 to 2018 at 2 large university hospitals was conducted. Patient demographics and tumor characteristics were collected. The RENAL nephrometry scores were calculated, and procedure-related adverse events were stratified into minor and major (the Society of Interventional Radiology classification of class C or higher). Technical and oncologic outcomes were based on follow-up magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography scans after ablation.

RESULTS

The mean RENAL score was 6.6 (range, 4-11), and the mean tumor size was 24 mm. Follow-up ranged between 16 and 161 weeks (median, 50 weeks; mean, 65 weeks). Oncologic control was achieved in 96% (n = 111) of patients. The major and minor adverse event rates were 8.6% (n = 10) and 17% (n = 19), respectively. The mean RENAL score for patients with recurrent and/or residual tumor (8.2 ± 2.7) was higher than that for patients without disease recurrence (6.5 ± 3.5, P = .05). However, in a multivariate analysis, the RENAL score was not found to be an independent predictor of oncologic outcomes (odds ratio, 1.548; P = .092).

CONCLUSIONS

The RENAL nephrometry score has minimal utility for predicting outcomes and adverse events in MWA of renal tumors. The inconsistent nature of RENAL nephrometry scoring in percutaneous ablation procedures underscores the need for an ablation-specific risk stratification system.

Imaging considerations for thermal and radiotherapy ablation of primary and metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Ablative (percutaneous and stereotactic) thermal and radiotherapy procedures for management of both primary and metastatic renal cell carcinoma are increasing in popularity in clinical practice. Data suggest comparable efficacy with lower cost and morbidity compared to nephrectomy. Ablative therapies may be used alone or in conjunction with surgery or chemotherapy for treatment of primary tumor and metastatic disease. Imaging plays a crucial role in pre-treatment selection and planning of ablation, intra-procedural guidance, evaluation for complications, short- and long-term post-procedural surveillance of disease, and treatment response. Treatment response and disease recurrence may differ considerably after ablation, particularly for stereotactic radiotherapy, when compared to conventional surgical and chemotherapies. This article reviews the current and emerging role of imaging for ablative therapy of renal cell carcinoma.

sABLATE: a simplified ABLATE score for prediction of complications and outcome in percutaneous thermal ablation of renal lesions

The aim of the study is to evaluate the performance of a simplified ABLATE score (sABLATE) in predicting complications and outcome with respect to RENAL, mRENAL, and ABLATE scores. This study included 136 renal lesions in 113 patients (M:F ratio = 2.5; mean age 70.8 years). 98 tumors underwent cryoablation at San Raffaele hospital between 01/2015 and 03/2020, while 37 underwent microwave ablation at San Paolo or Policlinico hospitals between 07/2016 and 03/2020. RENAL, mRENAL, ABLATE, and sABLATE scores were calculated using pre-procedural imaging. Data regarding complications and follow-up were registered. Mann-Whitney U test, ROC analyses, and logistic regression analyses were used for complications. Cox-regression analyses were performed for outcome. Mean tumor diameter was 23.2 mm. Mean and median RENAL, mRENAL, ABLATE, and sABLATE scores were 6.8 and 7, 6.9 and 7, 5.3, and 5, and 3.5 and 3, respectively. During a mean follow-up of 21.9 months (range 1-73), we registered 7 complications, 3 cases of residual disease, and 10 local tumor progressions. Mann-Whitney U test p values for complications for RENAL, mRENAL, ABLATE, and sABLATE were 0.51, 0.49, 0.66, and 0.056, respectively. ROC analyses for complications showed an AUC for RENAL, mRENAL, ABLATE, and sABLATE of 0.57, 0.57, 0.55, and 0.71, respectively. Regarding outcome, HR and p values of Cox-regression analyses were 1.30 and 0.36 for RENAL, 1.33 and 0.35 for mRENAL, 2.16 and 0.01 for ABLATE, 2.29 and 0.004 for sABLATE. sABLATE was the only score close to significance for complications, representing a progress even if not definitive. Regarding outcome, ABLATE confirmed its value, and sABLATE maintained validity despite being a simplification.

Computed Tomography-Guided Percutaneous Microwave Ablation for Renal Cell Carcinoma: Impact of Tumor Size on the Progression Survival Rates

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) along with identifying prognostic factors affecting the progression survival rate. Institutional database retrospective research identified 69 patients with a biopsy proven solitary T1a (82.6%) or TIb (17.4%) RCC who have underwent percutaneous CT-guided MWA. Kaplan–Meier survival estimates for events were graphed and Cox regression analysis was conducted. Mean patient age was 70.4 ± 11.5 years. Mean size of the lesions was 3 ± 1.3 cm. Mean follow up time was 35.6 months (SD = 21.1). The mean progression free survival time from last ablation was 84.2 months. For T1a tumors, the cumulative progression free survival rate for 1, 6, 12 and 36 months were 100% (SE = 0%), 91.2% (SE = 3.7%), 91.2% (SE = 3.7%) and 87.5% (SE = 4.4%); the recurrence free survival rate for T1a RCC was 94.9%. For T1b tumors, the cumulative progression free survival rate for 1, 6, 12 and 36 months were 100% (SE = 0%), 63.6% (SE = 14.5%), 63.6% (SE = 14.5%) and 63.6% (SE = 14.5%). Grade 1 complications were recorded in 5 (7.2%) patients. Significantly greater hazard for progression was found in cases with a tumor size > 4 cm (HR = 9.09, p = 0.048). No statistically important difference regarding tumor progression was recorded between T1a tumors with a diameter ≤3 cm and >3 cm. In summary, the results of the present study show that CT guided percutaneous MWA is an effective technique for treatment of T1a renal cell carcinomas, irrespective of tumor size. T1b tumors were associated with higher progression rates.

Efficacy and safety of CT-guided microwave ablation for stage T1a renal cell carcinoma in patients with a solitary kidney

OBJECTIVE

To retrospectively evaluate early clinical outcomes of percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) for stage T1a renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) in solitary kidney patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

15 solitary kidney patients with 16 stage T1a N0M0 biopsy-proved RCCs underwent CT-guided percutaneous microwave ablation between October 2016 and July 2020. The patients were followed up with contrast-enhanced computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging at 1, 3, and 6 months and every 6 months thereafter. Serum creatinine levels of each patient pre MWA, 1 day after MWA and the most recent record were collected. Technical effectiveness, local recurrence, survival rates and complications were accessed.

RESULTS

Complete ablation was achieved in all 16 tumors (100%) including 13 clear cell carcinomas and 3 papillary carcinomas. Within the follow-up time (median: 24 months) no tumor recurrence or major complication was detected. No significant change in serum creatinine level was noted. The cancer-specific survival rate was 100% (15 of 15), and 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival rates were 100%, 93.3%, and 93.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous MWA is an effective and safe treatment option for stage T1a RCCs in solitary kidney patients; it can achieve high complete ablation rate in selected lesions of appropriate size and location.

Computed Tomography-Guided Microwave Ablation of Cystic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Assessment of Technique and Complications

This report evaluates the techniques and complications of microwave ablation of cystic renal cell carcinoma. Five patients with cystic renal cell carcinoma were treated with microwave ablation between October 2015 and June 2020. Medical records were reviewed to evaluate technique and complications. Technical success and primary technique efficacy both were 100%. There were no complications. Mean follow-up time was 18 months (range, 6-36 months). No local recurrence was identified during the follow-up period. Renal function remained stable at 1 month and the last follow-up. Percutaneous microwave ablation is promising for the nonsurgical management of cystic renal cell carcinoma.

Percutaneous microwave ablation of renal cell carcinoma: practice guidelines of the ultrasound committee of Chinese medical association, interventional oncology committee of Chinese research hospital association

Imaging-guided percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) with high thermal efficiency comprises rapid, successful management of small renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) in selected patients. Ultrasound Committee of Chinese Medical Association, Interventional Oncology Committee of Chinese Research Hospital Association developed evidence-based guidelines for MWA of RCCs after systematically reviewing the 1969-2019 literature. Systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, cohort, and case-control studies reporting MWA of RCCs were included and levels of evidence assessed. Altogether, 146 articles were identified, of which 35 reported percutaneous MWA for T1a RCCs and 5 articles for T1b RCCs. Guidelines were established based on indications, techniques, safety, and effectiveness of MWA for RCCs, with the goal of standardizing imaging-guided percutaneous MWA treatment of RCCs. Key points Microwave ablation is recommended for managing small renal cell carcinoma in selected patients. Imaging protocols are tailored based on the procedural plan, guidance, and evaluation. Patient's selection evaluation, updated technique information, clinical efficacy, and complications are recommended to standardize management. A joint task force (multidisciplinary team) summarized the key elements of the standardized report.

Percutaneous Microwave Ablation of Category T1a Renal Cell Carcinoma: Intermediate Results on Safety, Technical Feasibility, and Clinical Outcomes of 119 Tumors

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to assess the safety, technical results, and clinical outcomes of CT-guided percutaneous microwave ablation of category T1a renal cell carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS. This retrospective study investigated consecutive patients who underwent CT-guided microwave ablation for T1a renal cell carcinoma from October 2015 to May 2019. Patient demographics including tumor characteristics, comorbidities, technical details, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. Local progression-free survival and overall survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS. One hundred-six patients including 70 men (mean age, 68.5 ± 8.9 [SD] years; range, 49-86 years) and 36 women (mean age, 69.5 ± 10.0 years; range, 50-88 years) with an overall mean age of 68.8 ± 9.2 years (range, 49-88 years) with 119 T1a renal cell carcinomas were treated with CT-guided microwave ablation. Technical success was achieved for 100% of the tumors. Complete response was achieved in 101 (95.3%) patients and partial response was achieved in five (4.7%) patients. Local progression-free survival was 100.0%, 92.8%, and 90.6% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. Overall survival was 99.0%, 97.7%, and 94.6% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. Six patients (5.7%) had seven complications (five with Clavien-Dindo Grade I, Society of Interventional Radiology [SIR] category A, two with Clavien-Dindo Grade III, SIR category B) within 30 days of the procedure. CONCLUSION. CT-guided percutaneous microwave ablation is associated with high rates of technical success, excellent local progression-free survival and overall survival, and a low complication rate for category T1a renal cell carcinoma.

Percutaneous Thermal Ablation for Treatment of T1a Renal Cell Carcinomas

Based on Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results studies, most renal cancers are low grade and slow growing. Long-term, single-center studies show excellent outcomes for T1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC), comparable to partial nephrectomy without affecting renal function and with much lower rates of complications. However, there are no multicenter randomized controlled trials of multiple ablative modalities or comparison with partial nephrectomy, and most studies are single-arm observational studies with short-term and intermediate follow-up. For treatment of stage T1a RCC, percutaneous TA is an effective alternative to surgery with preservation of renal function, low risk, and comparable overall and disease-specific survival.

Outcomes of Microwave Ablation for Small Renal Masses: A Single Center Experience

Purpose: To investigate the safety of microwave ablation (MWA) as an emerging technology for treating small renal masses. Materials and Methods: Patients with renal masses treated at a high-volume center with MWA between March 2015 and June 2019 were retrospectively identified. Safety, changes in renal function, primary treatment efficacy, and the natural history of imaging characteristics of masses postablation were examined. Results: Forty-five patients underwent MWA during the study period. Median age was 71 years (range 31-87). Median RENAL nephrometry score was 6 (range 4-9) with mean tumor size 2.6 ± 0.7 cm. Thirty-three percent of tumors were within 4 mm of the collecting system. Median total microwave energy applied was 400 W (range 105-2600 W). There was no significant change in creatinine (p = 0.21) or glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (p = 0.09) from preoperative to postoperative day 1 (POD#1) levels. There was a statistically but not clinically significant decrease in hemoglobin from preoperative to POD#1 levels (estimated -0.06 from 7 days before procedure to POD#1, p = 0.02). There was no durable change in creatinine (p = 0.16) or GFR (p = 0.72) at median follow-up of 7.5 months. There were 4 (9%) complications: three Clavien grade 1 and one Clavien grade 3 that led to loss of the kidney. Tumor size decreased postoperatively by an estimated -0.03 cm/month (range 0-1.9 cm, p < 0.01). Initial technical success was 100%. Primary treatment efficacy was 94%. Conclusion: MWA shows promise as an alternative thermal ablative technique with excellent short-term outcomes.

Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for ≥T1b Primary Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Report From the International Radiosurgery Oncology Consortium for Kidney (IROCK)

PURPOSE

Patients with larger (T1b, >4 cm) renal cell carcinoma (RCC) not suitable for surgery have few treatment options because thermal ablation is less effective in this setting. We hypothesize that SABR represents an effective, safe, and nephron-sparing alternative for large RCC.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Individual patient data from 9 institutions in Germany, Australia, USA, Canada, and Japan were pooled. Patients with T1a tumors, M1 disease, and/or upper tract urothelial carcinoma were excluded. Demographics, treatment, oncologic, and renal function outcomes were assessed using descriptive statistics. Kaplan-Meier estimates and univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression were generated for oncologic outcomes.

RESULTS

Ninety-five patients were included. Median follow-up was 2.7 years. Median age was 76 years, median tumor diameter was 4.9 cm, and 81.1% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1 (or Karnofsky performance status ≥70%). In patients for whom operability details were reported, 77.6% were defined as inoperable as determined by the referring urologist. Mean baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 57.2 mL/min (mild-to-moderate dysfunction), with 30% of the cohort having moderate-to-severe dysfunction (eGFR <45mL/min). After SABR, eGFR decreased by 7.9 mL/min. Three patients (3.2%) required dialysis. Thirty-eight patients (40%) had a grade 1 to 2 toxicity. No grade 3 to 5 toxicities were reported. Cancer-specific survival, overall survival, and progression-free survival were 96.1%, 83.7%, and 81.0% at 2 years and 91.4%, 69.2%, 64.9% at 4 years, respectively. Local, distant, and any failure at 4 years were 2.9%, 11.1%, and 12.1% (cumulative incidence function with death as competing event). On multivariable analysis, increasing tumor size was associated with inferior cancer-specific survival (hazard ratio per 1 cm increase: 1.30; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

SABR for larger RCC in this older, largely medically inoperable cohort, demonstrated efficacy and tolerability and had modest impact on renal function. SABR appears to be a viable treatment option in this patient population.

Percutaneous Microwave Ablation of Histologically Proven T1 Renal Cell Carcinoma

Objectives

To assess the safety and efficacy of percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) of histologically proven T1 renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

Methods

We analysed patients with a histologically proven RCC (≤ 7 cm) treated by MWA from April 2012–April 2018. Primary and secondary efficacy, local tumour recurrence (LTR), morbidity and mortality were reported. Efficacy was defined as no residual tumour enhancement on follow-up imaging 1 month after the first ablation (primary efficacy) and after re-ablation(s) for residual disease (secondary efficacy). Adverse events (AE) were registered by the Clavien–Dindo classification and the common terminology criteria for AE. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate a relation among pre-treatment factors incomplete ablation and complications.

Results

In 100 patients, a total of 108 RCCs (85 T1a and 23 T1b) were treated by MWA. Median size was 3.2 cm (IQR 2.4–4.0). Primary efficacy was 89% (95%CI 0.81–0.94) for T1a lesions and 52% (95%CI 0.31–0.73) for T1b lesions (p < 0.001). Fifteen lesions (7 T1a) were re-ablated for residual disease by MWA in one (n = 13) and two (n = 2, both T1b) sessions resulting in secondary efficacy rates of 99% (T1a) and 95% (T1b, p = 0.352). LTR occurred in four tumours (2 T1a, 2 T1b) after 10–60 months. Six (4%) AEs grade > 3–5 were observed (2 T1a, 4 T1b, p = 0.045). Multivariable analysis showed that mR.E.N.A.L. nephrometry was independently associated with incomplete ablation (p = 0.012).

Conclusion

Microwave ablation is safe and effective for T1a and T1b RCC lesions with a significantly lower primary efficacy for T1b lesions.

Percutaneous Microwave Ablation versus Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for cT1a Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity-matched Cohort Study of 1955 Patients

Background Percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) are two modalities indicated for early-stage renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with low extent of invasion. Purpose To compare the long-term results of percutaneous MWA and LPN in the treatment of cT1a RCC. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included 1955 patients with cT1a RCC treated with percutaneous MWA or LPN between April 2006 and November 2017. Propensity score matching was used. Oncologic outcomes were analyzed by using the Fine-and-Gray competing risk models. Results A total of 185 patients underwent percutaneous MWA (mean age, 63.2 years ± 15.2 [standard deviation]) and 1770 underwent LPN (mean age, 50.9 years ± 13.2). During the follow-up (median, 40.6 months), after propensity score matching, no difference was observed between local tumor progression (3.2% vs 0.5%, P = .10), cancer-specific survival (2.2% vs 3.8%, P = .24), and distant metastases (4.3% vs 4.3%, P = .76). Patients who underwent percutaneous MWA had worse overall survival (hazard ratio, 2.4; 95% confidence interval: 1.0, 5.7; P = .049 vs LPN) and disease-free survival (82.9% vs 91.4%, P = .003). Percutaneous MWA led to smaller drop in estimated glomerular filtration rate at discharge (6.2% vs 16.4%, P < .001), smaller estimated blood loss (4.5 mL ± 1.3 vs 54.2 mL ± 69.2), lower cost ($3150 ± 2970 vs $6045 ± 1860 U.S. dollars), shorter operative time (0.5 minute ± 0.1 vs 1.8 minutes ± 0.6), and shorter postoperative hospitalization time (5.1 days ± 2.6 vs 6.9 days ± 2.8) (all P < .001 vs LPN). There were fewer cases of fever in the percutaneous MWA group (16.2% vs 73.0%, P < .001). Conclusion There were no significant differences regarding oncologic outcomes and complications between percutaneous microwave ablation and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for patients with cT1a renal cell carcinoma. Percutaneous microwave ablation led to smaller renal function change and lower blood loss. For patients who cannot be subjected to the risks of more invasive laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, percutaneous microwave ablation could be an alternative less invasive treatment option. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Trends in Percutaneous Thermal Ablation Therapies in the Treatment of T1a Renal Cell Carcinomas Rather than Partial Nephrectomy/Radical Nephrectomy

With the increased incidence of stage T1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has come the recognition that these lesions tend to be low grade and slow growing, with low probability of metastasis not necessarily requiring surgery. As alternatives to surgery, both active surveillance and ablation have been advocated for the management of selected patients with stage T1a renal cancers due to slow rate of tumor growth and low metastatic potential based on recent epidemiological studies. Thermal ablation also has consistently reported favorable complication and renal preservation rates compared with surgical approaches. However, most studies are single-center case series and meta-analysis of these series and comparative prospective series with long-term follow-up are lacking. The purpose of this article is to review the principal thermal ablation modalities and oncological outcomes for the treatment of stage T1 RCCs with long-term follow-up.

The effect of tumor size and location on efficacy and safety of US- and CT- guided percutaneous microwave ablation in renal cell carcinomas

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of size and central location of the tumor on safety and efficacy of percutaneous CEUS- and CT-guided MWA in biopsy-proven renal cell carcinomas (RCCs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this IRB-approved retrospective study, 69 biopsy-proven renal tumors in 56 patients, who underwent MWA in our institution from January 2013 to March 2017, were evaluated. Data collection included demographics, tumor characteristics, procedural protocols, and follow-up visits within 6 months post procedure. Primary outcomes were assessed by technical success (TS), local tumor progression (LTP), and complications. The Kaplan-Meier analysis was used for survival rate.

RESULTS

Overall technical success was achieved for all 69 lesions (92.8% primary TS, 100% overall). Median nephrometry score was 8 (4-11) and median tumor size was 2.5 cm (0.8-7). Five lesions which required second ablation had significantly higher median tumor size 4 cm (P = 0.039) with the same nephrometry score. Renal function remained stable with no significant change in eGFR before or after ablation. The LTP rate was 5.8%. The most recurrent tumors were clear cell (50%) followed by papillary tumors (25%). The complication rate was 5.8% with minor complications (hematoma and pain) and no major issues. There was no significant association between nephrometry score and technical success, recurrence, or complication rates. Overall and tumor-specific survival rates were 96.7% and 100% at 11.9 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Image-guided MWA appears to be a safe and effective treatment regardless of nephrometry score and tumor location with high technical success, low recurrence, and complication rates.

Available ablation energies to treat cT1 renal cell cancer: emerging technologies

Purpose

An increasing interest in percutaneous ablation of renal tumors has been caused by the increasing incidence of SRMs, the trend toward minimally invasive nephron-sparing treatments and the rapid development of local ablative technologies. In the era of shared decision making, patient preference for non-invasive treatments also leads to an increasing demand for image-guided ablation. Although some guidelines still reserve ablation for poor surgical candidates, indications may soon expand as evidence for the use of the two most validated local ablative techniques, cryoablation (CA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA), is accumulating. Due to the collaboration between experts in the field in biomedical engineering, urologists, interventional radiologists and radiation oncologists, the improvements in ablation technologies have been evolving rapidly in the last decades, resulting in some new emerging types of ablations.

Methods

A literature search was conducted to identify original research articles investigating the clinical outcomes of new emerging technologies, percutaneous MWA, percutaneous IRE and SABR, in patients with primary cT1 localized renal cell cancer.

Results

Due to the collaboration between experts in the field in biomedical engineering, urologists, interventional radiologists and radiation oncologists, the improvements in ablation technologies have been evolving rapidly in the last decades. New emerging technologies such as microwave ablation (MWA), irreversible electroporation (IRE) and stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) seem to be getting ready for prime time.

Conclusion

This topical paper describes the new emerging technologies for cT1 localized renal cell cancer and investigates how they compare to CA and RFA.

The Role of Ablation and Minimally Invasive Techniques in the Management of Small Renal Masses

CONTEXT

Nephron-sparing approaches are increasingly recommended for incidental small renal masses. Herein, we review the current literature regarding the safety and efficacy of focal therapy, including percutaneous ablation, for small renal masses.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the application of ablative therapy in the management of small renal masses.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

PubMed and Medline database search was performed to look for findings published since 2000 on focal therapy for small renal masses. After literature review, 64 articles were selected and discussed.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Radiofrequency ablation and cryotherapy are the most widely used procedures with intermediate-term oncological outcome comparable with surgical series. Cost effectiveness seems excellent and side effects appear acceptable. To date, no randomized trial comparing percutaneous focal therapy with standard surgical approach or active surveillance has been performed.

CONCLUSIONS

Focal ablative therapies are now accepted as effective treatment for small renal tumors. For tumors <3cm, oncological effectiveness of ablative therapies is comparable with that of partial nephrectomy. Percutaneous ablation has fewer complications and a better postoperative profile when compared with minimally invasive partial nephrectomy.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Focal ablative therapies are now accepted as effective treatment for small renal tumors. For tumors <3cm, oncological effectiveness of ablative therapies is comparable with that of partial nephrectomy.

Efficacy and Safety of Microwave Ablation for Malignant Renal Tumors: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Literature Since 2012

OBJECTIVE

To systematically determine the treatment outcomes of percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) in patients with malignant renal tumor.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Original studies that reported the clinical outcomes of MWA in patients with malignant renal tumors were identified in MEDLINE and EMBASE from 2012 to June 30, 2017. Inverse variance and random-effects models were used to evaluate and acquire meta-analytic summary estimates of various clinical outcomes, including technical outcomes (technical success rate [TSR] and technical efficacy rate [TER]), oncologic outcomes (local tumor recurrence rate [LRR], cancer-specific survival rate [CSSR], and overall survival rate [OSR]), and complications.

RESULTS

Among the 145 articles screened, 13 articles including 567 patients carrying 616 malignant renal tumors were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analytic pooled TSR and TER were 97.3% (95% confidence interval, 94.3-99.4%; I2 = 0.0%) and 97.6% (95.0-99.4%, I2 = 48.5%), respectively. The meta-analytic pooled LRR was 2.1% (0.3-4.7%, I2 = 54.1%). At 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year follow-up time points, the meta-analytic pooled CSSRs were 99.1% (97.2-100.0%; I2 = 0.0%), 98.4% (95.1-100.0%; I2 = 31.2%), 97.6% (93.4-99.9%; I2 = 52.3%), and 96.9% (93.3-99.2%; I2 = 0.0%) respectively, while the OSRs were 98.3% (96.1-99.8%; I2 = 0.0%), 94.9% (91.7-97.5%; I2 = 0.0%), 86.8% (81.9-91.1%; I2 = 22.1%), and 81.9% (75.4-87.6%; I2 = 0.0%). In terms of major complications, a 1.8% (0.6-3.3%; I2 = 0.0%) rate of meta-analytic pooled incidence was found.

CONCLUSION

Microwave ablation showed favorable technical and oncologic outcomes with a low incidence of major complications. Hence, image-guided percutaneous MWA can be considered as a safe and effective treatment for malignant renal tumors.