1
|
Gueiderikh A, Faivre JC, Golfier C, Escande A, Thureau S. Efficacy of innovative systemic treatments in combination with radiotherapy for bone metastases: a GEMO (the European Study Group of Bone Metastases) state of the art. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2025; 44:28. [PMID: 39875680 PMCID: PMC11775081 DOI: 10.1007/s10555-024-10236-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2024] [Accepted: 12/18/2024] [Indexed: 01/30/2025]
Abstract
The management of bone metastases (BoM) requires a multidisciplinary approach to prevent complications, necessitating updated knowledge in light of the rapid advancements in systemic treatments and surgical, interventional radiology or radiation techniques. This review aims to discuss efficacy of new systemic treatments on BoM, the benefits of radiotherapy adjunction, and the optimal methods for combining them. Preliminary evidence suggesting reduced efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), and several multi-kinase inhibitors regarding BoM may encourage early use of radiotherapy (RT). Systemic treatment efficacy modulation by RT and ablative RT strategies are explored. Concerns for increased side effects for several kinase inhibitors and double ICI in combination with RT imply suspending those systemic treatments during RT. Various timing strategies to combine prostate hormone therapies and RT are developed. Emerging internal vectorized radiotherapy molecules necessitate developing new combination strategies with RT. Further prospective data collection and comparative trials should be encouraged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Gueiderikh
- Département de Radiothérapie, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Jean-Christophe Faivre
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-Lès-Nancy, 54519, France
| | - Constance Golfier
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-Lès-Nancy, 54519, France
| | - Alexandre Escande
- Service de Radiothérapie, Centre Léonard de Vinci, Dechy, France
- Laboratoire CRIStAL, UMR 9186, Université de Lille, Lille, France
- Faculté de Médecine H.Warembourg, Université de Lille, Lille, France
| | - Sébastien Thureau
- Département de Radiothérapie et de Physique Médicale, Centre Henri Becquerel Rouen QuantiF, LITIS EA4108 Université Rouen, Rouen, France.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Adida S, Taori S, Donohue JK, Rajan A, Sefcik RK, Burton SA, Flickinger JC, Gerszten PC. Stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with spinal metastases from prostate cancer. J Neurooncol 2024:10.1007/s11060-024-04821-0. [PMID: 39316317 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-024-04821-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2024] [Accepted: 09/03/2024] [Indexed: 09/25/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Spinal metastases may result in intractable pain, neurological deficit, and vertebral body collapse. There are only a few studies describing outcomes following spine stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) specifically for prostate cancer metastases. METHODS A prospectively collected database of patients with prostate cancer spinal metastases treated at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center from 2003 to 2023 was analyzed. The primary outcome was local control (LC). Secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS), pain resolution, and adverse radiation effects (AREs). RESULTS Thirty-seven patients and 51 lesions were identified. Fifteen lesions (29%) were previously resected and 34 lesions (67%) were previously irradiated. The median tumor volume was 37.0 cc (range: 2.9-263.3). A majority of lesions (71%) were treated in a single fraction (median 20 Gy, range: 14-22.5); multi-fractionated treatment consisted of 21-30 Gy in 2-5 fractions. Median follow-up was 12 months (range: 1-146). The 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year LC rates were 97%, 91%, and 91%, respectively. No tested prognostic factors were associated with LC, including hormone sensitivity. The 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year OS rates were 71%, 56%, and 32%; age > 70 years (p = 0.048) and tumor volume > 30 cc (p = 0.03) were associated with inferior rates of OS. Complete or partial pain response was observed in 58% of patients. There were 8 instances (16%) of AREs, 2 of which were vertebral compression fractures (4%). CONCLUSION Radiosurgery as a primary or adjuvant treatment modality for prostate cancer spinal metastases confers durable LC and moderate pain relief with minimal toxicity. Further studies are warranted to optimize management in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel Adida
- School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 3550 Terrace St, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop St Suite B-400, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
| | - Suchet Taori
- School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 3550 Terrace St, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop St Suite B-400, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Jack K Donohue
- School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 3550 Terrace St, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Akshath Rajan
- School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 3550 Terrace St, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Roberta K Sefcik
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of South Carolina, 96 Jonathan Lucas Street, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA
| | - Steven A Burton
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 5115 Centre Ave, Pittsburgh, PA, 15232, USA
| | - John C Flickinger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 5115 Centre Ave, Pittsburgh, PA, 15232, USA
| | - Peter C Gerszten
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 200 Lothrop St Suite B-400, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chen JJ, Weg E, Liao JJ. Prostate and metastasis-directed focal therapy in prostate cancer: hype or hope? Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2023; 23:163-176. [PMID: 36718727 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2023.2171991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The paradigm of focal therapy's role in metastatic patients is being challenged by evolving attitudes and emerging data. At the current time, specifically regarding prostate cancer, does the evidence indicate this is more hype or hope? AREAS COVERED We searched the literature via PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase for studies from 2014 to the present addressing focal therapy with non-palliative intent in metastatic prostate cancer patients, emphasizing prospective trials when available. We sought to address all common clinical scenarios: de novo synchronous diagnosis, oligorecurrence, oligoprogression, and mCRPC disease. EXPERT OPINION Current evidence is strongest, and in our opinion practice-changing, for prostate-directed RT in de novo metastatic patients with low metastatic burden. Metastasis-directed therapy with SBRT is consistently shown to have low rates of toxicity, and promising rates of ADT-free survival and progression-free survival. These can be utilized on a patient-by-patient basis with these endpoints in mind, but do not yet show sufficient benefit to be standard of care. This is a rich area of ongoing research, and many trials should publish in the coming years to shed light on many unanswered questions, including the role of cytoreductive prostatectomy, systemic therapy combined with MDT, and the integration of modern PET imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan J Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Emily Weg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jay J Liao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Roberts MJ, Maurer T, Perera M, Eiber M, Hope TA, Ost P, Siva S, Hofman MS, Murphy DG, Emmett L, Fendler WP. Using PSMA imaging for prognostication in localized and advanced prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol 2023; 20:23-47. [PMID: 36473945 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-022-00670-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The use of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-directed applications in modern prostate cancer management has evolved rapidly over the past few years, helping to establish new treatment pathways and provide further insights into prostate cancer biology. However, the prognostic implications of PSMA-PET have not been studied systematically, owing to rapid clinical implementation without long follow-up periods to determine intermediate-term and long-term oncological outcomes. Currently available data suggest that traditional prognostic factors and survival outcomes are associated with high PSMA expression (both according to immunohistochemistry and PET uptake) in men with localized and biochemically recurrent disease. Treatment with curative intent (primary and/or salvage) often fails when PSMA-positive metastases are present; however, the sensitivity of PSMA-PET in detecting all metastases is poor. Low PSMA-PET uptake in recurrent disease is a favourable prognostic factor; however, it can be associated with poor prognosis in conjunction with high 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Clinical trials embedding PSMA-PET for guiding management with reliable oncological outcomes are needed to support ongoing clinical use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J Roberts
- Department of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
- University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
- Department of Urology, Redcliffe Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
| | - Tobias Maurer
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Marlon Perera
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas A Hope
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Network, GZA Ziekenhuizen, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Shankar Siva
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Radiation Oncology, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Melbourne University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael S Hofman
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Melbourne University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Declan G Murphy
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Melbourne University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Louise Emmett
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- PET Committee of the German Society of Nuclear Medicine, Goettingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sánchez-Iglesias ÁL, Morillo-Macías V, Santafé-Jiménez A, Ferrer-Albiach C. Bone-only oligometastatic prostate cancer: can SABR improve outcomes? A single-center experience. Radiat Oncol J 2022; 40:192-199. [PMID: 36200308 PMCID: PMC9535412 DOI: 10.3857/roj.2022.00101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Ablative treatment of oligometastases has shown survival benefit with certain tumors, although these effects still are to be demonstrated in prostate cancer. Materials and Methods We analysed the toxicity and clinical control results obtained in patients with bone-only oligometastatic prostate cancer treated with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). Retrospective study on patients with metachronous oligoprogression and synchronous de novo bone-only oligometastatic prostate cancer treated with SABR and androgen deprivation therapy. Results Treatment schedules varied according to location and organs at risk, with biologically equivalent dose (BED) ≥100 Gy. Fifty-five bone lesions (31 patients) were treated and evaluated for toxicity, local control, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). After a 41-month follow-up, there was minimal acute or chronic toxicity and no G3 toxicity. The local control at 3 and 5 years was 100% and 87.1%, respectively. Median PFS and OS were 43 and 98 months, respectively. The best result in PFS was obtained with BED ≥230 Gy, delaying time to the next systemic therapy by 28.5 months. Conclusion The use of SABR in bone oligometastases of prostate cancer is safe with minimal toxicity and excellent results in local control and PFS, delaying the start of the next systemic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ángel L. Sánchez-Iglesias
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Consorcio Hospitalario Provincial de Castellón, Spain
- Correspondence: Ángel L. Sánchez-Iglesias Department of Radiation Oncology, Consorcio Hospitalario Provincial de Castellón, Avda. Dr. Clará 19, 12002 Castellón, Spain. Tel: +34-964-376000 Fax: +34-964-354401 E-mail:
| | | | - Ana Santafé-Jiménez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Consorcio Hospitalario Provincial de Castellón, Spain
| | - Carlos Ferrer-Albiach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Consorcio Hospitalario Provincial de Castellón, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abugharib A, Zeng KL, Tseng CL, Soliman H, Myrehaug S, Husain Z, Maralani PJ, Larouche J, Cheung P, Emmenegger U, Atenafu EG, Sahgal A, Detsky JS. Spine Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer Metastases and the Impact of Hormone Sensitivity Status on Local Control. Neurosurgery 2022; 90:743-749. [PMID: 35343467 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000001909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Accepted: 12/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is used to deliver ablative dose of radiation to spinal metastases. OBJECTIVE To report the first dedicated series of spine SBRT specific to prostate cancer (PCa) metastases with outcomes reported according to hormone sensitivity status. METHODS A prospective database was reviewed identifying patients with PCa treated with spine SBRT. This included those with hormone-sensitive PCa (HSPC) and castrate-resistant PCa (CRPC). The primary end point was MRI-based local control (LC). RESULTS A total of 183 spine segments in 93 patients were identified; 146 segments had no prior radiation and 37 had been previously radiated; 27 segments were postoperative. The median follow-up was 31 months. At the time of SBRT, 50 patients had HSPC and the remaining 43 had CRPC. The most common fractionation scheme was 24-28 Gy in 2 SBRT fractions (76%). LC rates at 1 and 2 years were 99% and 95% and 94% and 78% for the HSPC and CRPC cohorts, respectively. For patients treated with de novo SBRT, a higher risk of local failure was observed in patients with CRPC (P = .0425). The 1-year and 2-year overall survival rates were significantly longer at 98% and 95% in the HSPC cohort compared with 79% and 65% in the CRPC cohort (P = .0005). The cumulative risk of vertebral compression fracture at 2 years was 10%. CONCLUSION Favorable LC rates were observed after spine SBRT for PCa metastases; strategies to improve long-term LC in patients with CRPC require further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed Abugharib
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Sohag University Hospital, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - K Liang Zeng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Chia-Lin Tseng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hany Soliman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sten Myrehaug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Zain Husain
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Pejman Jabehdar Maralani
- Department of Medical Imaging, Neuroradiology Division, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jeremie Larouche
- Department of Surgery, Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Patrick Cheung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Urban Emmenegger
- Division of Medical Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eshetu G Atenafu
- Department of Biostatistics, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jay S Detsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Long-Lasting Palliation of Bone Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer After Repeated Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy. Ochsner J 2021; 21:301-305. [PMID: 34566514 PMCID: PMC8442208 DOI: 10.31486/toj.20.0132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Oligometastatic disease has emerged as a distinct clinical state, with a tumor burden intermediate between localized and extensive systemic disease. Oligometastatic prostate cancer has generally been classified as ≤3 metastases in bone or lymph nodes only. Improvements in diagnostic modalities such as functional imaging allow a greater frequency of oligometastases diagnosis. Selected bone oligometastatic prostate cancer patients can be treated with metastasis-directed stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) rather than androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). We describe a case representative of this scenario. Case Report: A 72-year-old male underwent surgery and salvage radiotherapy for a Gleason score 7 (3+4) adenocarcinoma confined in the prostate but with microscopic-positive surgical margins. Eight months after the end of radiotherapy, bone metastasis was diagnosed and treated with SBRT only because the patient refused ADT. In the subsequent 10 years, 6 more courses of SBRT were administered for new bone oligometastases encountered during follow-up. Neither local recurrence nor toxicity was observed after SBRT treatments. The patient, who is now 83 years old, has a Karnofsky Performance Status score of 90% and has preserved a satisfactory potentia coeundi. Conclusion: SBRT is a promising treatment for patients with bone oligometastatic prostate cancer, providing a high control rate within the irradiated volume and low toxicity. The ability to administer consecutive SBRT courses when new bone oligometastases are encountered in other sites can delay initiation of ADT. This case report reflects emerging trends for bone oligometastases treatment with metastasis-directed radiotherapy.
Collapse
|
8
|
Rogowski P, Trapp C, von Bestenbostel R, Schmidt-Hegemann NS, Shi R, Ilhan H, Kretschmer A, Stief C, Ganswindt U, Belka C, Li M. Outcomes of metastasis-directed therapy of bone oligometastatic prostate cancer. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:125. [PMID: 34193194 PMCID: PMC8247211 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01849-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2021] [Accepted: 06/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of this work was to investigate the outcome of metastasis-directed radiotherapy (MDT) in prostate cancer patients with bone metastases following current ESTRO/EORTC subclassifications for oligometastatic disease. Methods Clinical data of 80 consecutive oligometastatic patients with 115 bone lesions receiving MDT between 2011 and 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. Hormone-sensitive (77.5%) and castrate-resistant (22.5%) patients were included. MDT was delivered with conventional fractionated or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) techniques. Kaplan–Meier method, log rank test, as well as Cox regression were used to calculate local control (LC) and biochemical and clinical progression-free survival (bPFS/cPFS). Results At the time of MDT 31% of patients had de-novo synchronous oligometastatic disease, 46% had de-novo metachronous oligorecurrence after primary treatment and 23% had either de-novo oligoprogressive disease, repeat oligometastatic disease or induced oligometastatic disease. The median BED3 was 93.3 Gy (range 75.8–95.3 Gy). Concomitant ADT was administered in 69% of patients. After a median follow-up of 23 months the median bPFS and cPFS were 16.5 and 21.5 months, respectively. The 2-year LC rate was 98.3%. In multivariate analysis, age ≤ 70 (HR = 2.60, 95% CI 1.20–5.62, p = 0.015) and concomitant ADT (HR = 0.26, 95% CI 0.12–0.58, p = 0.001) significantly correlated with cPFS. Category of oligometastatic disease and hormone-sensitivity were predictive for cPFS in univariate analysis. Of 45 patients with biochemical relapse, nineteen patients (42.2%) had repeat oligometastatic disease. Fourteen patients (31%) underwent a second course of MDT. No patients experienced grade ≥ 3 toxicities. Conclusions MDT is safe and offers high local control rates in bone oligometastases of prostate cancer. At 2 years after treatment, more than 2 out of 5 patients are progression-free. Trial registration Retrospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Rogowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Trapp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Rieke von Bestenbostel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Run Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Christian Stief
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ute Ganswindt
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Innsbruck Medical University, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany
| | - Minglun Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Corrao G, Zaffaroni M, Bergamaschi L, Augugliaro M, Volpe S, Pepa M, Bonizzi G, Pece S, Amodio N, Mistretta FA, Luzzago S, Musi G, Alessi S, La Fauci FM, Tordonato C, Tosoni D, Cattani F, Gandini S, Petralia G, Pravettoni G, De Cobelli O, Viale G, Orecchia R, Marvaso G, Jereczek-Fossa BA. Exploring miRNA Signature and Other Potential Biomarkers for Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer Characterization: The Biological Challenge behind Clinical Practice. A Narrative Review. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13133278. [PMID: 34208918 PMCID: PMC8267686 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13133278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Revised: 06/16/2021] [Accepted: 06/24/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The oligometastatic prostate cancer state is defined as the presence of a number of lesions ≤ 5 and has been significantly correlated with better survival if compared to a number of metastases > 5. In particular, patients in an oligometastatic setting could benefit from a metastates directed therapy, which could control the disease delaying the start of systemic therapies. For this reason, the selection of true-oligometastatic patients who could benefit from such approach is particularly important in this setting. The aim of the present narrative review is to report the current state of the art on the liquid biopsy-derived analytes and their reliability as biomarkers in the clinics for the identification of true-oligometastatic patients. This kind of molecular profiling could refine current developments in the era of precision oncology allowing patients’ stratification and leading to more refined therapeutic strategies. Abstract In recent years, a growing interest has been directed towards oligometastatic prostate cancer (OMPC), as patients with three to five metastatic lesions have shown a significantly better survival as compared with those harboring a higher number of lesions. The efficacy of local ablative treatments directed on metastatic lesions (metastases-directed treatments) was extensively investigated, with the aim of preventing further disease progression and delaying the start of systemic androgen deprivation therapies. Definitive diagnosis of prostate cancer is traditionally based on histopathological analysis. Nevertheless, a bioptic sample—static in nature—inevitably fails to reflect the dynamics of the tumor and its biological response due to the dynamic selective pressure of cancer therapies, which can profoundly influence spatio-temporal heterogeneity. Furthermore, even with new imaging technologies allowing an increasingly early detection, the diagnosis of oligometastasis is currently based exclusively on radiological investigations. Given these premises, the development of minimally-invasive liquid biopsies was recently promoted and implemented as predictive biomarkers both for clinical decision-making at pre-treatment (baseline assessment) and for monitoring treatment response during the clinical course of the disease. Through liquid biopsy, different biomarkers, commonly extracted from blood, urine or saliva, can be characterized and implemented in clinical routine to select targeted therapies and assess treatment response. Moreover, this approach has the potential to act as a tissue substitute and to accelerate the identification of novel and consistent predictive analytes cost-efficiently. However, the utility of tumor profiling is currently limited in OMPC due to the lack of clinically validated predictive biomarkers. In this scenario, different ongoing trials, such as the RADIOSA trial, might provide additional insights into the biology of the oligometastatic state and on the identification of novel biomarkers for the outlining of true oligometastatic patients, paving the way towards a wider ideal approach of personalized medicine. The aim of the present narrative review is to report the current state of the art on the solidity of liquid biopsy-related analytes such as CTCs, cfDNA, miRNA and epi-miRNA, and to provide a benchmark for their further clinical implementation. Arguably, this kind of molecular profiling could refine current developments in the era of precision oncology and lead to more refined therapeutic strategies in this subset of oligometastatic patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Corrao
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy; (G.C.); (M.Z.); (L.B.); (S.V.); (M.P.); (G.M.); (B.A.J.-F.)
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20141 Milan, Italy; (S.P.); (G.M.); (C.T.); (G.P.); (G.P.); (O.D.C.); (G.V.)
| | - Mattia Zaffaroni
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy; (G.C.); (M.Z.); (L.B.); (S.V.); (M.P.); (G.M.); (B.A.J.-F.)
| | - Luca Bergamaschi
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy; (G.C.); (M.Z.); (L.B.); (S.V.); (M.P.); (G.M.); (B.A.J.-F.)
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20141 Milan, Italy; (S.P.); (G.M.); (C.T.); (G.P.); (G.P.); (O.D.C.); (G.V.)
| | - Matteo Augugliaro
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy; (G.C.); (M.Z.); (L.B.); (S.V.); (M.P.); (G.M.); (B.A.J.-F.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Stefania Volpe
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy; (G.C.); (M.Z.); (L.B.); (S.V.); (M.P.); (G.M.); (B.A.J.-F.)
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20141 Milan, Italy; (S.P.); (G.M.); (C.T.); (G.P.); (G.P.); (O.D.C.); (G.V.)
| | - Matteo Pepa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy; (G.C.); (M.Z.); (L.B.); (S.V.); (M.P.); (G.M.); (B.A.J.-F.)
| | - Giuseppina Bonizzi
- Department of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Salvatore Pece
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20141 Milan, Italy; (S.P.); (G.M.); (C.T.); (G.P.); (G.P.); (O.D.C.); (G.V.)
- Novel Diagnostics Program, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Nicola Amodio
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy;
| | | | - Stefano Luzzago
- Department of Urology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (F.A.M.); (S.L.)
| | - Gennaro Musi
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20141 Milan, Italy; (S.P.); (G.M.); (C.T.); (G.P.); (G.P.); (O.D.C.); (G.V.)
- Department of Urology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (F.A.M.); (S.L.)
| | - Sarah Alessi
- Division of Radiology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Francesco Maria La Fauci
- Unit of Medical Physics IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (F.M.L.F.); (F.C.)
| | - Chiara Tordonato
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20141 Milan, Italy; (S.P.); (G.M.); (C.T.); (G.P.); (G.P.); (O.D.C.); (G.V.)
- Department of Experimental Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Daniela Tosoni
- Novel Diagnostics Program, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy;
- Department of Experimental Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Federica Cattani
- Unit of Medical Physics IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (F.M.L.F.); (F.C.)
| | - Sara Gandini
- Department of Experimental Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Giuseppe Petralia
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20141 Milan, Italy; (S.P.); (G.M.); (C.T.); (G.P.); (G.P.); (O.D.C.); (G.V.)
- Division of Radiology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Gabriella Pravettoni
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20141 Milan, Italy; (S.P.); (G.M.); (C.T.); (G.P.); (G.P.); (O.D.C.); (G.V.)
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Ottavio De Cobelli
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20141 Milan, Italy; (S.P.); (G.M.); (C.T.); (G.P.); (G.P.); (O.D.C.); (G.V.)
- Department of Urology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (F.A.M.); (S.L.)
| | - Giuseppe Viale
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20141 Milan, Italy; (S.P.); (G.M.); (C.T.); (G.P.); (G.P.); (O.D.C.); (G.V.)
- Department of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Roberto Orecchia
- Scientific Direction, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Giulia Marvaso
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy; (G.C.); (M.Z.); (L.B.); (S.V.); (M.P.); (G.M.); (B.A.J.-F.)
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20141 Milan, Italy; (S.P.); (G.M.); (C.T.); (G.P.); (G.P.); (O.D.C.); (G.V.)
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy; (G.C.); (M.Z.); (L.B.); (S.V.); (M.P.); (G.M.); (B.A.J.-F.)
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20141 Milan, Italy; (S.P.); (G.M.); (C.T.); (G.P.); (G.P.); (O.D.C.); (G.V.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Onal C, Ozyigit G, Akgun Z, Atalar B, Igdem S, Oymak E, Agaoglu F, Selek U, Guler OC, Hurmuz P, Mustafayev TZ, Akyol F. Oligometastatic Bone Disease in Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Patients Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Using 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT: TROD 09-004 Study. Clin Nucl Med 2021; 46:465-470. [PMID: 33661210 DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000003558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the outcomes of metastasis-directed treatment (MDT) using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for bone-only oligometastasis (OM) detected with gallium prostate-specific membrane antigen (68Ga-PSMA) PET/CT in castration-sensitive prostate cancer (PC) patients. METHODS In this multi-institutional study, clinical data of 74 PC patients with 153 bone lesions who were undergoing MDT were retrospectively evaluated. Twenty-seven patients (36.5%) had synchronous, and 47 (63.5%) had metachronous OM. All patients had PC with 5 metastases or fewer detected by 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and treated using SBRT with a median dose of 20 Gy. The prognostic factors for PC-specific survival (PCSS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed. RESULTS The median follow-up was 27.3 months. Patients with synchronous OM were older and received higher rates of androgen deprivation therapy after SBRT compared with patients with metachronous OM. The 2-year PCSS and PFS rates were 92.0% and 72.0%, respectively. A prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline was observed in 56 patients (75.7%), and 48 (64.9%) had a PSA response defined as at least 25% decrease of PSA after MDT. The 2-year local control rate per lesion was 95.4%. In multivariate analysis, single OM and PSA response after MDT were significant predictors for better PCSS and PFS. In-field recurrence was observed in 4 patients (6.5%) with 10 lesions at a median of 13.1 months after MDT completion. No serious late toxicity was observed. CONCLUSIONS We demonstrated that SBRT is an efficient and well-tolerated treatment option for PC patients with 5 bone-only oligometastases or fewer detected with 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cem Onal
- From the Department of Radiation Oncology, Adana Dr Turgut Noyan Research and Treatment Center, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Adana
| | - Gokhan Ozyigit
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara
| | - Zuleyha Akgun
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sisli Hospital
| | - Banu Atalar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Acibadem MAA University Maslak Hospital
| | - Sefik Igdem
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istanbul Bilim University, Istanbul
| | - Ezgi Oymak
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Iskenderun Gelisim Hospital, Hatay
| | - Fulya Agaoglu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Acibadem MAA University Atakent Hospital
| | - Ugur Selek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Koc University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ozan Cem Guler
- From the Department of Radiation Oncology, Adana Dr Turgut Noyan Research and Treatment Center, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Adana
| | - Pervin Hurmuz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara
| | | | - Fadil Akyol
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Rogowski P, Roach M, Schmidt-Hegemann NS, Trapp C, von Bestenbostel R, Shi R, Buchner A, Stief C, Belka C, Li M. Radiotherapy of oligometastatic prostate cancer: a systematic review. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:50. [PMID: 33750437 PMCID: PMC7941976 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01776-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 02/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Due to improved imaging sensitivity, the term "oligometastatic" prostate cancer disease is diagnosed more often, leading to an increasing interest in metastasis-directed therapy (MDT). There are two types of radiation based MDT applied when treating oligometastatic disease: (1) stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) generally used for bone metastases; or (2) SBRT for isolated nodal oligometastases combined with prophylactic elective nodal radiotherapy. This review aims to summarize current evidence data, which may shed light on the optimal management of this heterogeneous group of patients. METHODS A systematic review of the Medline database through PubMed was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. All relevant studies published up to November 2020 were identified and screened. Fifty-six titles were included. Besides outcome parameters, different prognostic and predictive factors were assessed, including site of metastases, time between primary treatment and MDT, use of systemic therapies, hormone sensitivity, as well as pattern of recurrence. FINDINGS Evidence consists largely of retrospective case series and no consistent precise definition of oligometastasis exists, however, most investigators seem to acknowledge the need to distinguish between patients presenting with what is frequently called "synchronous" versus "metachronous" oligometastatic disease. Available data on radiotherapy as MDT demonstrate high local control rates and a small but relevant proportion of patients without progressive disease after 2 years. This holds true for both hormone sensitive and castration resistant prostate cancer diseases. The use of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for staging increased dramatically. Radiation doses and field sizes varied considerably among the studies. The search for relevant prognostic and predictive factors is ongoing. CONCLUSIONS To our best knowledge this review on oligometastatic prostate cancer included the largest number of original articles. It demonstrates the therapeutic potential and challenges of MDT for oligometastatic prostate cancer. Prospective studies are under way and will provide further high-level evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Rogowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Mack Roach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1600 Divisadero Street, Suite H 1031, San Francisco, CA 94143-1708 USA
| | | | - Christian Trapp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Rieke von Bestenbostel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Run Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander Buchner
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Stief
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany
| | - Minglun Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Miura N, Pradere B, Mori K, Mostafaei H, Quhal F, Misrai V, D'Andrea D, Albisinni S, Papalia R, Saika T, Scarpa RM, Shariat SF, Esperto F. Metastasis-directed therapy and prostate-targeted therapy in oligometastatic prostate cancer: a systematic review. MINERVA UROL NEFROL 2020; 72:531-542. [PMID: 32550632 DOI: 10.23736/s0393-2249.20.03779-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of this review was to summarize the available evidence on the role of metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) and/or prostate-targeted therapy (PTT) in the setting of oligometastatic prostate cancer (PCa). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We searched PubMed, the Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases. The following keywords were used: ("prostate cancer" OR "prostate carcinoma" OR "prostate neoplasm" OR "prostate tumor") AND ("oligometastatic" OR "oligometastasis" OR "PSMA") AND ("surgery" OR "prostatectomy" OR "radical prostatectomy" OR "cytoreductive" OR "local treatment" OR "radiotherapy" OR "stereotactic" OR "stereotaxic") AND ("survival" OR "mortality"). EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS After evaluating the selection criteria, 81 studies were evaluated for our endpoints. We included 22 studies for PTT of synchronous mPCa. There have been no randomized studies on cytoreductive prostatectomy (cRP). Four prospective studies showed that cRP was feasible but did not contribute to a positive effect on overall survival (OS). Regarding PTT-radiotherapy, two randomized controlled phase 3 trials showed that OS was improved in men with a low metastatic burden. Regarding MDT of metachronous lymph node recurrence, we included 29 retrospective studies. For MDT of oligometastases, we included 30 studies. One randomized phase 2 trial showed that androgen deprivation therapy-free survival improved with stereotactic body radiation therapy compared to that with surveillance; however, benefits on OS remain unclear. CONCLUSIONS We performed a comprehensive overview of the current literature on MDT and PTT. The feasibility of MDT and PTT is supported by several retrospective studies. Nevertheless, there remains a lack of high-quality trials to prove its survival benefits. Results from ongoing prospective trials data are awaited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noriyoshi Miura
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria -
- Department of Urology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Ehime, Japan -
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Tours, Tours, France
- EAU Young Urologist Office (YOU), Arnhem, the Netherlands
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Vincent Misrai
- Department of Urology, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France
| | - David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Simone Albisinni
- Department of Urology, Erasme Hospital, University Clinics of Brussels, University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Rocco Papalia
- Department of Urology, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy
| | - Takashi Saika
- Department of Urology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Ehime, Japan
| | - Roberto M Scarpa
- Department of Urology, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Urology, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
- European Association of Urology Research Foundation, Arnhem, the Netherlands
| | - Francesco Esperto
- EAU Young Urologist Office (YOU), Arnhem, the Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
- European Society of Residents in Urology (ESRU), Arnhem, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer Recurrence: A Meta-analysis. Am J Clin Oncol 2020; 43:73-81. [PMID: 31809327 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the treatment efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in oligometastatic prostate cancer recurrence and to assess whether there is any relationship between biologically effective dose (BED) and local control (LC). MATERIALS AND METHODS Eligible studies were identified on Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, and the proceedings of annual meetings through May 2019 were also identified. A meta-regression analysis was performed to assess whether there is a relationship between BED and LC. In the univariate analysis, studies were separated by the study design, the number of metastatic sites, the site of metastases, radiotherapy machine, and prostate-specific antigen level at the time of SBRT. A P-value <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS Twenty-three observational studies with a total of 1441 lesions treated were included in the meta-analysis. The proportional rate of LC, progression-free survival, and androgen deprivation-free survival was 0.976 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.96-0.98), 0.413 (95% CI: 0.378-0.477), and 20.1 months (95% CI: 14.5-25.6), respectively. In the meta-regression, a linear relationship between BED and LC was detected (P=0.017). Stratifying the BED into 3 levels (BED<100 Gy3, BED 100 to 130 Gy3, and BED>130 Gy3), a significant difference was observed between BED<100 Gy3 (LC=88%) versus BED>100 Gy3 (LC=96%). The rate of any acute and late grade ≥2 toxicity was 1.3% and 1.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The LC rate with SBRT was excellent with minimal severe acute/late toxicity. Our data suggest a dose relationship between BED and LC, with BED >100 Gy3 resulting in better rates of LC.
Collapse
|
14
|
Bowden P, See AW, Frydenberg M, Haxhimolla H, Costello AJ, Moon D, Ruljancich P, Grummet J, Crosthwaite A, Pranavan G, Peters JS, So K, Gwini SM, McKenzie DP, Nolan S, Smyth LML, Everitt C. Fractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy for up to five prostate cancer oligometastases: Interim outcomes of a prospective clinical trial. Int J Cancer 2020; 146:161-168. [PMID: 31199504 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2019] [Revised: 05/23/2019] [Accepted: 05/29/2019] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) can delay escalation to systemic treatment in men with oligometastatic prostate cancer (PCa). However, large, prospective studies are still required to evaluate the efficacy of this approach in different patient groups. This is the interim analysis of a prospective, single institution study of men relapsing with up to five synchronous lesions following definitive local treatment for primary PCa. Our aim was to determine the proportion of patients not requiring treatment escalation following SBRT. In total, 199 patients were enrolled to receive fractionated SBRT (50 Gray in 10 fractions) to each visible lesion. Fourteen patients were castration resistant at enrolment. The proportion of patients not requiring treatment escalation 2 years following SBRT was 51.7% (95% CI: 44.1-59.3%). The median length of treatment escalation-free survival over the entire follow-up period was 27.1 months (95% CI; 21.8-29.4 months). Prior androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) predicted a significantly lower rate of freedom from treatment escalation at 2 years compared to no prior ADT (odds ratio = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.08-0.54, p = 0.001). There was no difference in the efficacy of SBRT when treating 4-5 vs. 1-3 initial lesions. A prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline was induced in 75% of patients, with PSA readings falling to an undetectable level in six patients. No late grade three toxicities were observed. These interim results suggest that SBRT can be used to treat up to five synchronous PCa oligometastases to delay treatment escalation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Mark Frydenberg
- Department of Surgery, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.,Australian Urology Associates, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Hodo Haxhimolla
- Department of Urology, The Canberra Hospital, Canberra, ACT, Australia.,Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Anthony J Costello
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Daniel Moon
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Epworth HealthCare, Richmond, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Jeremy Grummet
- Department of Surgery, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.,Epworth HealthCare, Richmond, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Ganes Pranavan
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Canberra Hospital, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Justin S Peters
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,Epworth HealthCare, Richmond, VIC, Australia.,Department of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Kevin So
- Icon Cancer Centre, Richmond, VIC, Australia
| | - Stella M Gwini
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Dean P McKenzie
- Epworth HealthCare, Richmond, VIC, Australia.,School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Skye Nolan
- Icon Cancer Centre, Richmond, VIC, Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Loi M, Nuyttens JJ, Desideri I, Greto D, Livi L. Single-Fraction Radiotherapy (SFRT) For Bone Metastases: Patient Selection And Perspectives. Cancer Manag Res 2019; 11:9397-9408. [PMID: 31807069 PMCID: PMC6842277 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s186630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2019] [Accepted: 10/22/2019] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Bone metastases are a frequent and important source of morbidity in cancer patients. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an established treatment option for local control and pain relief of bone metastases, and it is increasingly used as upfront treatment, postoperative consolidation or salvage treatment after prior RT. However, heterogeneity of dose schedules described in literature represents a severe limitation in the definition of the role of SBRT as a standard of care. No consensus is available on the use of single versus multiple fraction SBRT for bone metastases. Advantages of single-fraction SBRT include shorter overall duration of treatment, absence of inter-fraction uncertainty, improved compliance, theoretical increased efficacy, and lower costs. However, caution has been advised due to reports of severe late toxicities, in particular, vertebral collapse fracture (VCF). The aim of this paper is to review dose fractionation and indications for the management of bone metastases using SBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mauro Loi
- Radiotherapy Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Joost J Nuyttens
- Radiotherapy Department, Erasmus MC Cancer Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Isacco Desideri
- Radiotherapy Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Daniela Greto
- Radiotherapy Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Livi
- Radiotherapy Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ong WL, Koh TL, Lim Joon D, Chao M, Farrugia B, Lau E, Khoo V, Lawrentschuk N, Bolton D, Foroudi F. Prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA-PET/CT)-guided stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy for oligometastatic prostate cancer: a single-institution experience and review of the published literature. BJU Int 2019; 124 Suppl 1:19-30. [DOI: 10.1111/bju.14886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Wee Loon Ong
- Department of Radiation Oncology; Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre; Austin Health; Heidelberg Vic. Australia
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine; Monash University; Melbourne Vic. Australia
- School of Clinical Medicine; University of Cambridge; Cambridge UK
| | - Tze Lui Koh
- Department of Radiation Oncology; Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre; Austin Health; Heidelberg Vic. Australia
| | - Daryl Lim Joon
- Department of Radiation Oncology; Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre; Austin Health; Heidelberg Vic. Australia
| | - Michael Chao
- Department of Radiation Oncology; Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre; Austin Health; Heidelberg Vic. Australia
| | - Briana Farrugia
- Department of Radiation Oncology; Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre; Austin Health; Heidelberg Vic. Australia
| | - Eddie Lau
- Department of Radiology; Austin Health; Heidelberg Vic. Australia
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy; Austin Health; Heidelberg Vic. Australia
- Department of Medicine; University of Melbourne; Melbourne Vic. Australia
| | - Vincent Khoo
- Department of Medicine; University of Melbourne; Melbourne Vic. Australia
- Institute of Cancer Research; Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust; London UK
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences; Monash University; Clayton Vic. Australia
| | - Nathan Lawrentschuk
- Department of Surgery; Austin Health; Heidelberg Vic. Australia
- EJ Whitten Prostate Cancer Research Centre; Epworth Healthcare; Melbourne Vic. Australia
| | - Damien Bolton
- Department of Surgery; Austin Health; Heidelberg Vic. Australia
| | - Farshad Foroudi
- Department of Radiation Oncology; Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre; Austin Health; Heidelberg Vic. Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
18F-DCFPyL PET/CT in a Single Large Metastasis With Prostate-Specific Antigen Level of 856 ng/mL. Clin Nucl Med 2019; 44:e588-e589. [PMID: 31274553 DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000002690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Literature shows that prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT may detect biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer at low prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, including detection of oligometastatic disease and hence direct metastasis-directed therapy. Although it is generally accepted that higher PSA values indicate higher disease burden, few data are available on the relation between PSA levels and number of detected metastases on PSMA PET/CT. This report demonstrates a patient with high PSA levels (856 ng/mL) at time of biochemical recurrence that showed only 1 metastasis on PSMA PET/CT. Combined androgen deprivation therapy and radiation therapy resulted in a complete biochemical response.
Collapse
|
18
|
Metastasis-directed stereotactic radiotherapy for oligoprogressive castration-resistant prostate cancer: a multicenter study. World J Urol 2019; 37:2631-2637. [DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02717-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2019] [Accepted: 03/02/2019] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
|
19
|
Palacios-Eito A, Béjar-Luque A, Rodríguez-Liñán M, García-Cabezas S. Oligometastases in prostate cancer: Ablative treatment. World J Clin Oncol 2019; 10:38-51. [PMID: 30815370 PMCID: PMC6390116 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v10.i2.38] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2018] [Revised: 10/30/2018] [Accepted: 01/09/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Technological advances in radiotherapy have led to the introduction of techniques such as stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), allowing the administration of ablative doses. The hypothesis that oligometastatic disease may be cured through local eradication therapies has led to the increasing use of SBRT in patients with this type of disease. At the same time, scientific advances are being made to allow the confirmation of clinically suspected oligometastatic status at molecular level. There is growing interest in identifying patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer (PCa) who may benefit from curative intent metastasis-directed therapy, including SBRT. The aim is to complement, replace or delay the introduction of hormone therapy or other systemic therapies. The present review aims to compile the evidence from the main ongoing studies and results on SBRT in relation to oligometastatic PCa; examine aspects where gaps in knowledge or a lack of consensus persist (e.g., optimum schemes, response assessment, identification and diagnosis of oligometastatic patients); and document the lack of first-level evidence supporting the use of such techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amalia Palacios-Eito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba 14004, Spain
| | - Amelia Béjar-Luque
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba 14004, Spain
| | | | - Sonia García-Cabezas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba 14004, Spain
| |
Collapse
|