Current status of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in gastrointestinal surgery

Enhanced recovery after surgery: nursing strategy for total hip arthroplasty in older adult patients

BACKGROUND

The incidence of total hip arthroplasty (THA) is dramatically increasing, particularly in older adults. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has been used in the postoperative care of patients undergoing surgical treatment.

AIMS

This study compared the effects of ERAS and regular nursing on older adult patients undergoing THA to evaluate ERAS's potential in patients' postoperative care.

METHODS

Ninety older adult patients (age ≥ 60 years) who underwent THA were enrolled and randomly divided into two groups: regular and ERAS nursing strategies. The ERAS nursing strategy was optimized based on regular nursing in terms of pain management, nutrition management, intestinal preparation, drainage tube nursing, catheter nursing, and normothermia maintenance. The efficiency of the two nursing strategies was evaluated from the perspectives of postoperative pain, hospitalization conditions, hip function, daily life ability, complications, and satisfaction.

RESULTS

The ERAS group showed earlier first aerofluxus, getting out of bed, and defecation; the moving distance after getting out of bed was greater than that in the regular group. The removal of urinary and drainage tubes was also earlier in the ERAS group than in the regular group. ERAS significantly alleviated postoperative pain, increased Harris scores and the Barthel index, reduced hospitalization duration and expenses, and lowered the occurrence of complications. The ERAS group also showed higher satisfaction levels than the regular group.

CONCLUSIONS

This single-blind randomized controlled trial showed that the ERAS nursing strategy reduced pain, length and cost of hospital stay, and incidence of complications after THA compared with regular care. Therefore, ERAS nursing strategies are recommended to improve the postoperative recovery rates in older adult patients undergoing THA.

The impact of ERAS-based nursing interventions on postoperative complication management and prognosis in early gastrointestinal tumor endoscopic resection: a prospective randomized controlled study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)-based nursing interventions in improving postoperative recovery, reducing complications, and enhancing patient satisfaction and quality of life in patients undergoing endoscopic resection for early gastrointestinal tumors.

METHODS

A single-center, randomized, single-blind controlled trial was conducted from October 2023 to October 2024 at a tertiary hospital. A total of 120 patients with early-stage gastrointestinal tumors scheduled for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) or endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) were randomly assigned to the ERAS group (n = 60) or the control group (NC, n = 60). Data collection included Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), EORTC QLQ-C30, SF-36, patient satisfaction, and length of hospital stay. Statistical analyses included repeated measures ANOVA and chi-square tests, with a significance threshold of P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Compared to the NC group, the ERAS group demonstrated significantly lower CCI scores and fewer Clavien-Dindo ≥ III complications at 3 days, 2 weeks, and 3 months postoperatively (P < 0.05). The ERAS group also reported shorter hospital stays (4.8 ± 1.5 vs. 6.3 ± 1.8 days, P < 0.001). VAS scores in the ERAS group were significantly lower at 24 h and 3 days postoperatively (P < 0.001), with differences diminishing over time. Functional recovery, measured by 6MWT, was significantly better in the ERAS group at all time points except 12 months. HRQoL scores in the ERAS group were significantly higher at 3 months, particularly in functional and symptom dimensions (P < 0.05), and have higher patient satisfaction rates across all follow-up time points (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

ERAS-based nursing interventions significantly improved postoperative recovery, reduced complications, shortened hospital stays, and enhanced patient satisfaction and quality of life in patients undergoing minimally invasive endoscopic resection for early gastrointestinal tumors. These findings support the integration of ERAS principles into nursing care protocols to optimize surgical outcomes.

Evolution of pain management in lung cancer surgery: from opioid-based to personalized analgesia

Pain management in lung cancer resection has undergone a paradigm shift from opioid-centric approaches to multimodal analgesia, and more recently, personalized strategies that integrate the principles of precision medicine. Historically, opioids have been the mainstay of perioperative analgesia. However, concerns regarding opioid-related adverse effects, including respiratory depression, immunosuppression, and potential oncologic implications, have driven the adoption of opioid-sparing techniques. Current strategies emphasize multimodal analgesia, combining nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, acetaminophen, regional anesthesia, and adjunctive agents to enhance pain control while minimizing opioid exposure. However, growing evidence suggests that perioperative analgesics may differentially influence tumor biology depending on molecular and genetic factors, necessitating a more tailored approach. This has led to the emergence of precision oncoanesthesia, which aims to integrate tumor-specific genomic insights into perioperative pain management. Although promising, the clinical implementation of precision oncoanesthesia remains in its early stages, with key challenges including the lack of large-scale prospective studies, limited real- time genomic profiling in anesthetic planning, and variability in patient responses to analgesics. Future research should focus on identifying biomarkers that predict individual responses to perioperative analgesia and establishing evidence-based guidelines for precision- based pain management. By evolving beyond traditional opioid reliance and standard analgesic protocols, perioperative pain management in lung cancer surgery can align with emerging precision medicine approaches, ensuring effective pain control and optimized oncologic outcomes.

The use of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols in plastic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols, introduced in 1997, are evidence-based strategies designed to reduce postoperative stress and improve recovery through a multidisciplinary approach. This systematic review evaluated the use of ERAS in plastic surgery, focusing on opioid use, pain management, hospital stay, and patient outcomes.

METHODS

A literature search in PubMed/MEDLINE and Web of Science was conducted up to May 9, 2024, identifying 239 studies on ERAS in plastic surgery. Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria, and 9 studies involving 1228 patients were included. Outcomes assessed were narcotic use, pain scores, hospital stay, and complications. Quality was assessed using the National Institute of Health (NIH) tool.

RESULTS

Among the 9 studies, 4 were included in a meta-analysis (600 participants). ERAS protocols were associated with a significantly shorter hospital stay (mean difference: -0.58 days, P = 0.003) with no heterogeneity. Opioid use decreased (mean difference: -85.5 morphine milligram equivalents [MME]), although the results were uncertain due to high heterogeneity (I² = 99.9). ERAS also showed lower pain scores within 24 h postsurgery, but with considerable variability (mean difference: -1.56, P = 0.27).

CONCLUSION

ERAS protocols reduce opioid consumption and hospital stays while maintaining or improving patient satisfaction in plastic surgery. Despite risks such as increased bleeding, the benefits suggest that ERAS enhances recovery. Future research should optimize protocols and address regional implementation challenges.

The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Pathway Is Safe, Feasible and Cost-Effective in Delayed Graft Function After Kidney Transplant

Background/Objectives: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways are still underutilized in kidney transplantation (KT), and their feasibility after delayed graft function (DGF) is unknown. We aimed to evaluate safety and cost savings after ERAS implementation in KT recipients with DGF. Methods: A retrospective analysis of KT recipients enrolled in the ERAS program with DGF (≥1 dialytic treatment during the first postoperative week or creatinine≥ 2.5 mg/dL on postoperative day 10) between 2010 and 2019 was performed. Recipient, donor, and transplant data, outcomes, and 1-year post-KT costs were collected, comparing recipients within the ERAS target (≤5 days, "early discharge group") to those discharged later (>5 days, "late discharge group"). Results: Out of 170 KT recipients with DGF, 33 (19.4%) were in the "early discharge group" and 137 (80.5%) in the "late discharge group". Recipient, donor, and transplant characteristics were similar in the two groups. The length of hospital stay (LOS) of the "early discharge group" was significantly shorter, with fewer in-hospital dialysis sessions (p < 0.001) compared to the "late discharge group". One year post-KT, no significant differences were observed in postoperative complications, readmissions, or number of outpatient visits. Five-year graft and patient survival along with five-year graft function were similar between the two cohorts. First-year costs were significantly higher in the "late discharge group" (p < 0.001), with a median excess cost (Δ) of EUR 4515.76/patient. Factors influencing first-year costs post-KT were LOS for KT, recipient age, and use of expanded-criteria grafts. Conclusions: The ERAS approach is safe in KT recipients with DGF and allows for economic savings, while its implementation does not cause worse clinical outcomes in recipients.

Effects of postoperative quantitative assessment strategy-based nursing in patients with colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Scientifically sound and reasonable care strategies in surgical nursing play a crucial role in facilitating postoperative recovery and preventing complications. This study focused on the application of quantitative assessment strategies to postoperative care. By quantitatively analyzing the effects of nursing interventions, we explored their feasibility and effectiveness at improving postoperative recovery quality and reducing the incidence of complications. This study provides a scientific basis for nursing practice and offers new insights into nursing management with significant clinical value.

AIM

To analyze the efficacy of postoperative quantitative assessment strategy-based nursing care for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHODS

This randomized controlled trial evaluated the ability of nursing interventions using a quantitative assessment strategy to prevent postoperative complications and enhance patient recovery. Patients with CRC were randomly divided into routine nursing (RN) and quantitative assessment strategy nursing (QASN) groups. The RN group received standard care, while the QASN group also underwent screenings for visual analog scale for pain, Barthel Index for functional recovery, and self-rating anxiety scale and self-rating depression scale for psychological status. Follow-ups were conducted on postoperative days 1, 7, 14, 28, and 56.

RESULTS

The participants' baseline characteristics did not significantly differ between study groups, thereby ensuring the reliability of the results. The QASN vs RN group showed significant improvements in pain management (visual analog scale scores) and psychological status (self-rating anxiety scale and self-rating depression scale scores) and a reduced incidence of postoperative complications (P < 0.05). The follow-up evaluations at specified intervals confirmed these findings, indicating that quantitative assessment strategies significantly enhanced patients' postoperative pain management and psychological well-being.

CONCLUSION

Nursing interventions using structured quantitative assessments demonstrated significantly improved postoperative recovery and quality of life in patients with CRC, supporting their integration into standard postoperative care protocols.

Pain, opioid consumption, and epidural anesthesia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease undergoing laparoscopic subtotal colectomy: an observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

Surgery is often needed to provide disease control in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Studies document increased postoperative pain and complicated perioperative courses. This study examines postoperative pain and opioid consumption in patients with inflammatory bowel disease undergoing laparoscopic subtotal colectomy. Furthermore, the impact of epidural anesthesia is investigated.

METHODS

This study encompassed an observational cohort of patients with inflammatory bowel disease undergoing subtotal colectomy in the period 1 January 2018 to 30 June 2023 at a university hospital in Denmark. Demographic and perioperative data, opioid consumption, pain scores, and procedural data of epidural anesthesia were retrieved from patient records. Data were stratified according to the use of epidural anesthesia.

RESULTS

The study included 153 patients. Overall, 45% of patients received epidural anesthesia. Opioid consumption in the postoperative care unit was 9.2 mg (3.3-15.8 mg) and 3.8 mg (0-15 mg) (P = 0.04) in patients without and with epidural anesthesia, respectively. Correspondingly, opioid consumption during the first 24 h postoperatively was 23.3 mg (10-33 mg) and 6.8 mg (0-21.7 mg) (P < 0.001). Numerical rating scale (NRS) pain in the postoperative care unit was 3.5 (2-4.6) and 2.7 (1.3-4.3) in patients without and with epidural anesthesia, respectively (P = 0.1645). Thirty percent of patients treated with epidural anesthesia experienced ≥ 1 adverse event(s) related to epidural anesthesia.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates a relatively low consumption of opioids and low pain scores in the early postoperative period following laparoscopic subtotal colectomy regardless of the use of epidural anesthesia. Epidural anesthesia was associated with a substantial frequency of adverse events.

Incorporating preoperative and intraoperative data to predict postoperative pneumonia in elderly patients undergoing non-cardiothoracic surgery: The online two-stage prediction tool

BACKGROUND

Prior research on postoperative pneumonia (POP) risk models focused on preoperative factors but overlooked intraoperative variables vital for precision. These models also neglected the higher-risk elderly population. This study seeks to develop and evaluate preoperative and combined models to predict POP risk in elderly patients undergoing non-cardiothoracic surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of 444 patients who underwent non-cardiothoracic surgery at Nanjing First Hospital from March 2021 to April 2022 was included. Univariate analysis and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression were employed to develop preoperative and combined logistic regression models.

RESULTS

The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for both models exceeded 0.80, indicating excellent discriminatory ability. Furthermore, the combined model demonstrated superior predictive accuracy compared to the preoperative model.

CONCLUSION

This study developed preoperative and combined nomograms that offer practical and innovative tools for clinicians to predict POP risk and improve patient care.

High glycemic variability serves as an independent risk factor for postoperative infection-related complications in patients undergoing radical surgery for gastric, colon, and rectal cancer

Patients with gastrointestinal surgery have a higher incidence of infection-related complications than the rest of those who undergo clean cut surgery. It can lead to a worse prognosis for patients. This study aimed to assess the association between glycemic variability (GV) and postoperative infection-related complications of gastrointestinal cancer patients. A total of 438 patients were included in this study. Using univariate and multivariate regression analyses, the risk factors for postoperative complications were determined. And nomogram prediction models were constructed through machine learning. The performance of the nomogram was assessed with respect to the calibration curves. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis showed that high GV on post operation day (POD)1 (P < .001), high leukocytes on POD4 (P = .003 < .01) and alcohol consumption (P = .005 < .01) were independent risk factors for postoperative infection-related complications in patients with gastrointestinal cancers. The area under the curve (AUC) showed that these 3 prediction models established through logistic regression (AUC = 0.81), XGBoost (AUC = 0.82) and random forest (AUC = 0.78) all performed well. Our study confirmed that higher GV on POD1 were independent risk factors for postoperative infection-related complications within 30 days of surgery in patients with gastrointestinal cancers. And the nomogram prediction model confirmed its capable for predicting infection-related complications.

Effect of enhanced recovery after surgery on postoperative outcomes in children undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effects of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) perioperative protocol on the outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) in pediatric patients.

METHODS

A total of 57 children who underwent RALP at our center between November 2021 and December 2023 were included in the study. They were randomly assigned to either the ERAS (intervention) group or the non-ERAS (control) group. The analysis focused on comparing the length of hospital stay, recovery of gastrointestinal function, incidence of complications within 90 days post-surgery, postoperative extubation time (urinary tube and double-J tube), postoperative auxiliary examinations, and readmission rates within 30 days. Additionally, the patients were divided into two age groups: <4 years old and ≥4 years old, to assess pain severity.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in preoperative general information, preoperative auxiliary examination findings, or intraoperative conditions between the ERAS and non-ERAS groups. The ERAS group had a significantly shorter postoperative hospital stay compared to the non-ERAS group. Furthermore, the time to the first postoperative bowel movement was shorter, and the incidence of postoperative complications was significantly lower in the ERAS group. Among children <4 years old, there was no significant difference in pain severity between the two groups. However, in children ≥4 years old, the ERAS group experienced significantly lower pain levels at 6 and 24 h post-surgery compared to the non-ERAS group.

DISCUSSION

The findings of this prospective randomized controlled trial should determine if ERAS is superior to traditional perioperative management in children undergoing RALP, particularly regarding postoperative hospital stay, intestinal function recovery, pain response, and complication rates. We anticipate that our data will offer valuable clinical insights and guidance for the implementation of ERAS in pediatric robotic surgery for urinary diseases.

CONCLUSION

The ERAS protocol can reduce the length of hospital stay, aid in the recovery of gastrointestinal function, and lower postoperative complication rates. It also has the potential to lessen postoperative pain to varying degrees in certain pediatric patients. ERAS is a safe and effective protocol for pediatric patients undergoing RALP.

Meta-analysis: The utility of the anterior quadratus lumborum block in abdominal surgery

BACKGROUND

Regional anesthesia is routinely used in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathways to improve post-operative recovery times. No consensus has been reached on optimal block type. This study reviews the current literature as it pertains to the anterior quadratus lumborum (aQL) block in all abdominal surgeries, as well as its efficacy compared to the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block.

METHODS

PubMed was searched for original, peer-reviewed articles that include "(anterior) quadratus lumborum block." 89 articles were included. Data was extracted according to PRISMA guidelines, with articles manually reviewed by two independent reviewers. A meta-analysis was then conducted on a subset of 14 randomized control trials (RCT) evaluating total oral morphine equivalent consumed at 12 and 24 ​h post-operatively in patients who received an aQL block compared to control.

RESULTS

28 articles were included with 14 RCT used in a random-effects meta-analysis. There was a significant reduction in post-operative pain scores and opioid use in patients who receive an aQL block for abdominal surgeries. Meta-analysis determined a decrease in total oral morphine equivalent consumed at both 12 and 24 ​h post-operatively compared to controls. Compared to no region block, both the aQL and TAP block show a significant reduction in pain and post-operative opioid consumption.

CONCLUSION

The literature demonstrates non-inferiority of the aQL block compared to the TAP block in abdominal surgery, with some studies suggesting its superiority. Limitations include heterogeneity in study type and design, as well as the presence of confounding variables when comparing across surgery types.

Effects of Sodium Bicarbonate Ringer's Solution Combined with Positive End-Expiratory Pressure on the Internal Environment of Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery: A Randomized 2 × 2 Factorial Design Pilot

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the influence of sodium bicarbonate Ringer's solution (BRS) combined with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on the internal environment in patients who have undergone laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

METHODS

A total of 128 patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery were randomly divided into the control group (group C), the PEEP group (group P), the BRS group (group B), and the BRS combined with the PEEP group (group BP). The results of arterial blood gas analysis, including pH value, base excess (BE), concentrations of electrolyte, and lactate (Lac) were documented before intravenous infusion (T0) and 5 min after the surgery (T1). Additional metrics included tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) and were quantified before intravenous infusion and at 30 min post-surgery. The quality of recovery-15 questionnaire (QoR-15) scores were documented preoperatively (D0) and on the first (D1) and third (D3) days, postoperatively.

RESULTS

There was no significant interaction effect between the two factors of BRS and PEEP (p = 0.659). After the infusion of BRS, the pH level increased significantly at T2 (p < 0.05). Using PEEP during operation can increase PaO2 in patients with obesity (p < 0.05). The level of pH value is increased, and the concentrations of inflammatory factors are reduced due to the combination of BRS and PEEP (p < 0.05). Compared with group C, group BP exhibited an augmentation in QoR-15 (p < 0.05), and the recovery time of group BP was significantly shortened (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

BRS combined with PEEP has been demonstrated to improve acid-base balance, reduce the inflammatory response, shorten the recovery time, and substantially enhance the quality of early postoperative recovery.

Enhancing Recovery in Gastrointestinal and Cardiovascular Surgeries Through Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols aim to improve perioperative outcomes and expedite recovery across various surgical specialties. While ERAS protocols have shown significant benefits in gastrointestinal and cardiovascular surgeries, their impact and effectiveness require further synthesis. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of ERAS protocols in enhancing recovery and reducing complications in gastrointestinal and cardiovascular surgeries. High-quality studies were selected based on adherence to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and quality assessment using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). A systematic review and meta-analysis of six high-quality studies involving 45,678 patients were conducted using databases such as PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central. Data on length of hospital stay (LOS), complications, 30-day readmissions, and mortality were extracted. Statistical analysis employed random-effects models to calculate pooled effect sizes, odds ratios (ORs), and hazard ratios. Subgroup analyses were performed based on surgery type, patient age, comorbidities, and follow-up duration. ORs for postoperative complications varied across subgroups (e.g., urgent vs. elective surgeries), with some ranges (e.g., 0.65-1.02) reflecting mixed effects; sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of pooled outcomes. Recovery times ranged from 1 to 3 days for gastrointestinal surgeries and 4 to 9 days for cardiovascular surgeries, demonstrating clinically meaningful variability. ERAS protocols showed greater recovery benefits in urgent surgeries (HR = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.15-1.75) and in patients with comorbidities (HR = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.33-1.96), likely due to their emphasis on rapid stabilization of perioperative care, including early mobilization and nutritional support. Heterogeneity, assessed through sensitivity analyses, ranged from moderate to substantial across subgroup analyses. ERAS protocols consistently enhance recovery outcomes, minimize complications, and reduce hospital stays in gastrointestinal and cardiovascular surgeries, demonstrating their utility in optimizing perioperative care. Future research should explore long-term outcomes and tailored implementation strategies to address patient-specific needs.

Optimizing Surgical Outcomes: The Role of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols in Improving Recovery and Reducing Hospital Stays in Pakistan

Background Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) procedures are increasingly recognized for their ability to improve surgical outcomes and shorten hospital stays, particularly in resource-constrained environments like Pakistan. This study underscores the transformative potential of ERAS protocols in not only enhancing patient recovery but also optimizing healthcare resource utilization in such settings. The research aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of ERAS protocols in reducing postoperative complications and hospital stays among surgical patients in Pakistan, with a focus on their impact on overall recovery and healthcare efficiency. Methodology A prospective cohort design was employed, recruiting 400 adult patients aged 18 years and older undergoing elective surgical procedures from January to December 2023. Data on demographics, adherence to ERAS procedures, postoperative complications, duration of hospital stay, and recovery metrics were gathered before, during, and after surgery for participants who were split into ERAS and standard care groups. To compare results between groups, statistical procedures such as t-tests and chi-square tests were used. Results The ERAS group exhibited a significantly shorter mean length of hospital stay (3.52 ± 1.27 days) compared to the standard care group (6.29 ± 2.15 days, p < 0.001). Full recovery rates at 30 days, three months, and six months were significantly higher in the ERAS group, with 160 patients (80.0%), 178 patients (89.0%), and 191 patients (95.5%), respectively. In contrast, the standard care group showed recovery rates of 122 patients (61.0%), 147 patients (73.5%), and 164 patients (82.0%) at the same intervals. The ERAS group also had lower rates of postoperative complications, with 176 patients (88.0%) experiencing no complications compared to 152 patients (76.0%) in the standard care group, and lower readmission rates, with nine patients (4.5%) compared to 19 patients (9.5%) in the standard care group. Conclusion The successful implementation of ERAS procedures in Pakistan highlights their potential to improve healthcare efficiency by increasing surgical recovery and lowering hospital stays.

Efficacy of intraoperative systemic lidocaine on quality of recovery after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Many clinical trials have demonstrated the benefits of intraoperative systemic lidocaine administration in major abdominal surgeries. We tested the hypothesis that systemic lidocaine is associated with an enhanced early quality of recovery in patients following laparoscopic colorectal resection.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We randomly allocated 126 patients scheduled for laparoscopic colorectal surgery in a 1:1 ratio to receive either lidocaine (1.5 mg kg-1 bolus over 10 min, followed by continuous infusion at 2 mg kg-1 h-1 until the end of surgery) or identical volumes and rates of saline. The primary outcome was the Quality of Recovery-15 score assessed 24 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes were areas under the pain numeric rating scale curve over time, 48-h morphine consumption, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Compared with saline, systemic lidocaine improved the Quality of Recovery-15 score 24 h postoperatively, with a median difference of 4 (95% confidence interval: 1-6; p = 0.015). Similarly, the area under the pain numeric rating scale curve over 48 h at rest and on movement was reduced in the lidocaine group (p = 0.004 and p < 0.001, respectively). However, these differences were not clinically meaningful. Lidocaine infusion reduced the intraoperative remifentanil requirements but not postoperative 48-h morphine consumption (p < 0.001 and p = 0.34, respectively). Additionally, patients receiving lidocaine had a quicker and earlier return of bowel function, as indicated by a shorter time to first flatus (log-rank p < 0.001), yet ambulation time was similar between groups (log-rank test, p = 0.11).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery, intraoperative systemic lidocaine resulted in statistically but not clinically significant improvements in quality of recovery (see Graphical Abstract).Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry; ChiCTR1900027635.

Urgent focus on enhanced recovery after surgery of AIDS patients with limb fractures

Aims

The incidence of limb fractures in patients living with HIV (PLWH) is increasing. However, due to their immunodeficiency status, the operation and rehabilitation of these patients present unique challenges. Currently, it is urgent to establish a standardized perioperative rehabilitation plan based on the concept of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS). This study aimed to validate the effectiveness of ERAS in the perioperative period of PLWH with limb fractures.

Methods

A total of 120 PLWH with limb fractures, between January 2015 and December 2023, were included in this study. We established a multidisciplinary team to design and implement a standardized ERAS protocol. The demographic, surgical, clinical, and follow-up information of the patients were collected and analyzed retrospectively.

Results

Compared with the control group, the ERAS group had a shorter operating time, hospital stay, preoperative waiting time, postoperative discharge time, less intraoperative blood loss, and higher albumin and haemoglobin on the first postoperative day. The time to removal of the urinary catheter/drainage tube was shortened, and the drainage volume was also significantly reduced in the ERAS group. There was no significant difference in the visual analogue scale (VAS) scores on postoperative return to the ward, but the ERAS group had lower scores on the first, second, and third postoperative days. There were no significant differences in the incidence of complications, other than 10% more nausea and vomiting in the control group. The limb function scores at one-year follow-up were similar between the two groups, but time to radiological fracture union and time to return to physical work and sports were significantly reduced in the ERAS group.

Conclusion

The implementation of a series of perioperative nursing measures based on the concept of ERAS in PLWH with limb fracture can significantly reduce the operating time and intraoperative blood loss, reduce the occurrence of postoperative pain and complications, and accelerate the improvement of the functional status of the affected limb in the early stage, which is worthy of applying in more medical institutions.

What Is the Role of the Gut Microbiota in Anastomotic Leakage After Colorectal Resection? A Scoping Review of Clinical and Experimental Studies

Background: Anastomotic leakage (AL) still remains a common complication after colorectal anastomosis that leads to increased morbidity and mortality. The gut microbiota has been hypothesized as one of the risk factors associated with anastomotic leakage. The aim of the present study was to summarize all existing clinical and experimental studies that evaluate the impact of intestinal microbiota on anastomotic leakage after colorectal resection. Methods: The present scoping review was designed according to PRISMA recommendations and a systematic search in Medline, Scopus, EMBASE, Clinicaltrials.gov, Google Scholar, and CENTRAL was conducted until September 2024. Results: Overall, 7 clinical and 5 experimental studies were included. A diminished α-diversity of the gut microbiota in patients suffering from AL was demonstrated. Specific microbe genera, such as Lachnospiraceae, Bacteroidaceae, Bifidobacterium, Acinetobacter, Fusobacterium, Dielma, Elusimicronium, Prevotella, and Faecalibacterium, seem to be associated with AL. However, specific genera, like Prevotella, Streptococcus, Eubacterium, Enterobacteriaceae, Klebsiella, Actinobacteria, Gordonibacter, Phocaeicola, and Ruminococcus2, seem to be protective against AL. Experimental studies highlighted that the Western diet seems to affect microbiota diversity and increases the AL rate, whereas anastomotic healing seems to be impaired by high metalloproteinase production and increased collagenase activity. Conclusions: The intestinal microbiota seems to play an important role in anastomotic leakage after colorectal resection. Specific interventions targeting the microbiota's composition and the pathophysiological mechanisms by which it impairs anastomotic healing could diminish the risk for anastomotic leakage and improve clinical outcomes. However, future studies should be based on prospective design and eliminate heterogeneity.

Early intravenous branched-chain amino acid-enriched nutrition supplementation in older patients undergoing gastric surgery: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

The initiation time and formula for supplemental parenteral nutrition after surgery require optimization, especially in older patients undergoing major gastrointestinal surgery. This study aimed to assess the effect of early supplementation with a branched-chain amino acid (BCAA)-enriched formula (BAF) on short-term postoperative outcomes in older patients undergoing gastric surgery.

METHODS

This single-center, prospective, double-blinded, randomized clinical trial was conducted from March 10, 2020, to September 15, 2022. Patients aged 65-80 years with gastric cancer scheduled for curative resection were assessed for eligibility and randomly allocated to a high-proportion BCAA (HBCAA) (early supplementation with the BAF) or control (routine nutrition) group. The primary outcome was the standardized length of hospital stay (LOS).

RESULTS

A total of 150 patients were randomized. Thirteen patients were excluded due to the resection of other organs, presence of metastasis, or withdrawal of consent. Finally, we included 70 and 67 patients in the HBCAA and control groups, respectively (mean age: 70.5 ± 4.2 years; 96 men [70.1%]). The standardized LOS was significantly shorter in the treatment group than in the control group (median [interquartile range]: 8.0 [7.8, 8.0] vs. 8.5 [8.0, 9.0] days; mean difference, 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.02-0.74 days; P < .001). Patients in the HBCAA group showed better gastrointestinal function with faster defecation (4.0 [3.6, 5.0] vs. 5.0 [4.0, 5.5] days; mean difference, 0.6 days; 95% CI, 0.26-0.94 days; P < .001) and semi-liquid diet initiation (8.0 [7.5, 8.0] vs. 8.0 [8.0, 8.8] days; mean difference, 0.36 days; 95% CI, 0.03-0.7 days; P < .001) and had lesser weight loss at postoperative day 5 than those in the control group did (3.5 [2.7, 6.5] vs. 4.9 [3.3, 7.6]%; mean difference, 1.23%; 95% CI, 0.27-2.19%; P = .011).

CONCLUSIONS

In this randomized clinical trial, compared with routine nutrition, early supplementation with a BAF was associated with a shorter standardized LOS in older patients undergoing gastric surgery, suggesting that it may be a favorable strategy for patients with a poor tolerance to external nutrition who are undergoing major surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov; Identifier: ChiCTR2000029635.

Have outcomes following colectomy in the United States improved over time?

BACKGROUND

There has been tremendous effort to improve quality following colorectal surgery, including the proliferation of minimally invasive techniques, enhanced recovery protocols, and surgical site infection prevention bundles. While these programs have demonstrated improved postoperative outcomes at the institutional level, it is unclear whether similar benefits are present on a national scale.

METHODS

American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) Targeted Colectomy data from 2012 to 2020 were used to identify patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery (MIS) or open partial colectomy (CPT 44140, 44204) or low anterior resection (CPT 44145, 44207). Chronological cohorts as well as annual trends in 30-day postoperative outcomes including surgical site infection, venous thromboembolism, and length of stay were assessed using both univariable and multivariable regression analyses.

RESULTS

261,301 patients, 135,876 (52 ​%) female, with a median age of 62 (IQR 53-72) were included. Across all years, MIS partial colectomy was the most common procedure (37 ​%), followed by MIS low anterior resection (27 ​%), open partial colectomy (24 ​%), and open low anterior resection (12 ​%). MIS increased from 59 ​% in 2012-2014 to 66 ​% in 2018-2020 (p ​< ​0.001). During this same period, postoperative length of stay decreased from a median of 5 days (IQR 4-7) in 2012-2014 to 4 days (IQR 3-6) in 2018-2020 (p ​< ​0.001). Superficial surgical site infections decreased from 5.5 ​% in 2012-2014 to 2.9 ​% in 2018-2020 (p ​< ​0.001). Deep surgical site infections similarly decreased from 1.1 ​% to 0.4 ​% between these periods (p ​< ​0.001). Pulmonary embolism also decreased from 0.6 ​% to 0.5 ​% between periods (p ​= ​0.02). 30-day mortality was unchanged at 1.7 ​% between 2012-2014 and 2018-2020 (p ​= ​0.40). After adjustment for ACS NSQIP estimated probability of morbidity and mortality, undergoing a colectomy in 2020 compared to 2012 was associated with a 14 ​% decrease in postoperative length of stay (p ​< ​0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Between 2012 and 2020, significant improvements in postoperative outcomes after colectomy were observed in the United States. These results support the positive impact that the widespread adoption of quality improvement initiatives is having on colorectal patient care nationally.

Trend of ambulatory benign prostatic obstruction surgeries during COVID-19 pandemic

INTRODUCTION

Benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) is one of the most common causes of male lower urinary tract symptoms. Some institutions routinely perform BPO surgeries in ambulatory setting, while others elect for overnight hospitalization. With the COVID-19 pandemic limiting resources and hospital space for elective surgery, we investigated the time trend of ambulatory BPO procedures performed around the COVID-19 outbreak.

METHODS

We identified BPO surgeries from the California State Inpatient and State Ambulatory Surgery Databases between 2018 and 2020. Our primary outcome was the proportion of procedures performed in ambulatory settings with a length of stay of zero days. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to analyze factors associated with ambulatory surgery around the COVID-19 outbreak. Spline regression with a knot at the pandemic outbreak was performed to compare time trends pre- and post-pandemic.

RESULTS

Among 37,148 patients who underwent BPO procedures, 30,067 (80.9%) were ambulatory. Before COVID-19, 80.1% BPO procedures were performed ambulatory, which increased to 83.4% after COVID-19 outbreak (p < 0.001). In multivariable model, BPO procedures performed after COVID-19 outbreak were 1.26 times more likely to be ambulatory (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.14-1.40, p < 0.0001). Spline curve analysis indicated significantly different trend of change pre- and post-pandemic (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

We observed a rising trend of BPO surgeries performed in ambulatory setting post-pandemic. It remains to be seen if the observed ambulatory transition remains as we continue to recover from the pandemic.

ERAS and Gastrointestinal Site Infections: Insights from a Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are proposed to enhance perioperative care, but their impact on various surgical outcomes requires further insight. Objective: This extensive meta-analysis aimed to systematically estimate the effectiveness of ERAS in reducing postoperative complications and improving recovery metrics. Materials and Methods: We meticulously searched multiple databases and rigorously screened studies, ultimately including 16 high-quality research articles in our meta-analysis. We carefully assessed heterogeneity using the Cochran Q test and I2 index. Results were visualized using forest plots, displaying effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: The current meta-analysis reveals compelling evidence of ERAS protocols' impact on postoperative effects. Lung infection rates were significantly reduced, with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.4393 (95% CI: 0.2674; 0.7216, p = 0.0012), highlighting the protocols' effectiveness. Although the reduction in surgical site infections (SSIs) was not significant, with an OR of 0.8003 (95% CI: 0.3908; 1.6389, p = 0.5425), the data suggests a trend toward benefit. Urinary tract infections (UTI) also showed a promising decrease, with an OR of 0.4754 (95% CI: 0.2028; 1.1143, p = 0.0871), revealing ERAS protocols may mitigate UTI risks. No significant effects were observed on postoperative anastomotic leakage or ileus, with ORs indicating neutrality. The incidence of readmission was similarly unaffected, with an OR of 1.4018 (95% CI: 0.6860; 2.8647, p = 0.3543). These outcomes underscore the selective efficacy of ERAS protocols, advocating for their strategic implementation to optimize surgical recovery. Conclusions: This meta-analysis offers compelling evidence supporting the implementation of ERAS in mitigating specific post-surgical conditions. It underscores the potential of ERAS to enhance recovery experiences and improve healthcare efficiency. Further targeted research is warranted to fully understand the impact of ERAS on SSI, anastomotic leakage, ileus, and readmissions and to optimize its benefits across diverse surgical populations.

Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) on surgical site infection and postoperative recovery outcomes: a retrospective study of 1276 cases

This retrospective observational study aimed to evaluate the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) in the era of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) and the effect of ERAS on postoperative outcomes. Totally 1,276 patients (565 in ERAS group and 711 in non-ERAS group) who underwent operations at the department of general surgery during 2017-2021 were included. Risk factors were identified via logistic regression analysis and meta-analysis of all relevant published studies was performed. Subsequently, propensity score matching was used to match different risk factors. Overall, 40 patients were diagnosed with SSI, and the pooled incidence of SSI was 3.13%. In total, 14 (2.48%) and 26 (3.66%) patients in the ERAS and non-ERAS groups, respectively, were diagnosed with SSI (P = 0.230). Among patients for whom the ERAS protocol was adopted, 7 independent risk factors of SSI were identified. After propensity score matching, in patients without SSI, the number of hospital days was significantly lower in the ERAS group than in the non-ERAS group (2 [2, 5] vs. 3 [2, 7], P = 0.005), whereas in patients with SSI, the number of hospital days was similar between the ERAS and non-ERAS groups. ERAS had no effect on the incidence of SSI but could significantly accelerate the discharge of uninfected patients. In the era of ERAS, SSI incidence was affected by the type of surgery; number of postoperative hospital days; type of incision; serum hemoglobin, total protein, and albumin levels; and antibiotic prophylaxis. Furthermore, these results will significantly affect the implementation of the ERAS protocol and optimal preoperative management.

Evaluating the impact of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols following emergency laparotomy - A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials

INTRODUCTION

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are an evidence-based, multidisciplinary, and systematic approach to peri-operative care, which attempt to reduce the anticipated physiological strain on patients after major surgery. This meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials (RCTs) evaluated the impact of ERAS following emergency laparotomy versus standard care.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed as per PRISMA guidelines. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan v5.4.

RESULTS

Six RCTs involving 509 patients were included. Patients randomised to ERAS had reduced post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) (odds ratio (OR): 0.32, 95 ​% confidence interval (CI): 0.20-0.51), time to ambulation (mean difference (MD): 1.67, 95 ​% CI: -2.56 to -0.78) and bowel opening (MD: -1.26, 95 ​% CI: -2.03 to -0.49), length of stay (LOS) (MD: -2.92 95 ​% CI: -3.73 - - 2.10), pulmonary complications (OR: 0.43, 95 ​% CI: 0.24-0.75), surgical site (OR: 0.33 95 ​% CI: 0.2-0.50) and urinary tract infections (OR: 0.48 95 ​% CI: 0.19-1.16).

CONCLUSION

ERAS successfully reduced patient recovery, LOS, and complications. ERAS protocols should be deployed, where feasible, for emergency laparotomy.

Vaginal natural orifice transvaginal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) for benign ovarian cysts is safe and feasible in same-day discharge: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Advances in minimally invasive surgery and the development of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) have favored the spread of day-surgery programs. Even though Vaginal natural orifice transvaginal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) is accepted as an innovative treatment for benign ovarian cysts that is rapidly gaining recognition worldwide, the safety and feasibility of same-day surgery (SDS) have yet to be established.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of day surgery compared to inpatient surgery of patients undergoing vNOTES for benign ovarian cysts by determining perioperative outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study consisted of 213 patients who underwent vNOTES for ovarian cystectomy at a single institution from January 2020 to November 2022. Based on the hospital stay, patients were classified into the same-day surgery group (SDSG) and the inpatient surgery group (ISG); after data processing and screening considering the balance of the two groups, SDSG has 83 samples(n = 83), and ISG has 113 samples(n = 113). The patient's demographic characteristics and follow-up data were collected during the perioperative period by doctors and nurses for medical tracking and analysis purposes and 1-month postoperatively by doctors in charge of their operation. Independent sample t-tests were performed to verify if there was any major difference between these two groups for continuous data like age, BMI, and cyst diameter, and Pearson's chi-squared tests were used to test whether there was a major difference between these two groups for categorical data like cyst count, abdominal surgery history and whether their cyst is bilateral ovarian cysts or not. The association between exhaust time and postoperative characteristics and the association between levels of pain and postoperative characteristics were further analyzed to unveil the confounding factors contributing to the same-day discharge method's quick recovery nature.

RESULTS

Upon performing propensity score matching, 196 patients were finally enrolled in this study for the matched comparison, including 83(42.3%) patients in the SDSG and 113(57.7%) patients in the ISG. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of duration of operation (85.0 ± 41.5 min vs. 80.5 ± 33.5 min), estimated blood loss (27.7 ± 28.0 ml vs. 36.3 ± 33.2 ml), preoperative hemoglobin levels (128.8 ± 13.2 g/L vs. 128.6 ± 14.0 g/L), postoperative hemoglobin difference at 24 h (16.5 ± 15.4 g/L vs. 19.3 ± 9.1 g/L), pelvic adhesions (42 (50.6%) vs. 47 (41.6%)), and postoperative complications (7(8.4%) vs. 4(3.5%)). The SDSG group showed less time of feeding/off-bed/exhaust/urination after surgery, shorter hospitalization duration, a lower postoperative 6-hour pain score, and a lower incidence of analgesic drug use. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that advancing the time of postoperative off-bed activity and feeding reduced the postoperative exhaust time by 0.34 (95% CI: 0.185-0.496, 0.34 h, p < 0.001) and 0.299(95% CI: 0.158-0.443, 0.229 h, p = 0.036) hours. In addition, Ordinal logistic regression revealed a correlation between pain scores and bilaterality of cyst, increasing about 25.98 times the risk of pain levels when ovarian cysts are bilateral (OR: 26.98, 95% CI: 1.071-679.859, P = 0.045).

CONCLUSION

In this pilot study, same-day discharge after vaginal natural orifice transvaginal endoscopic ovarian cystectomy is safe and feasible. The vNOTES for ovarian cystectomy combined with the same-day discharge shorten the exhaust time and duration of hospitalization, reduce postoperative pain, and lower the use incidence of analgesic drugs.

The application of ERAS in the perioperative period management of patients for lung transplantation

Objective

To explore the application of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in the perioperative period of lung transplantation.

Methods

We retrospectively collected the clinical data of 27 lung transplant patients who underwent ERAS during the perioperative period, while 12 lung transplant patients receiving routine treatment served as controls. General information was collected, including the specific implementation plan of ERAS, the incidence of complications and survival rate during the perioperative period (<30 d), postoperative hospitalization indicators, the postoperative length of stay, and numerical rating scale (NRS) scores.

Results

Comparison of postoperative hospitalization indicators, the ERAS group compared with the control group, there were significant differences in postoperative ICU stay time (2.0(2.0,4.0) vs 4.5(3.0,6.0), p = 0.005), postoperative hospital stay time (18(15,26) vs 24(19.5,32.75), p = 0.016), duration of nasogastric tube (3(2,3) vs 4(2.25,4.75), p = 0.023), and first ambulation time (4(3,5) vs 5.8(4.5,7.5), p = 0.004). There was no significant difference in postoperative invasive mechanical ventilation time, time to eat after surgery, duration of urinary catheter and duration of chest tube between the ERAS group and the control group (p>0.05). The perioperative survival of the ERAS group was 81.5%, which was higher than the control group (66.7%), but there is no statistically significant difference. Comparison of post-extubation NRS scores, the ERAS group had lower NRS scores at 12 h (5.30 ± 0.14 vs 6.25 ± 0.75), 24 h (3.44 ± 0.64 vs 5.58 ± 0.9), 48 h (2.74 ± 0.66 vs 4.08 ± 0.79) and 72 h (1.11 ± 0.80 vs 2.33 ± 0.49) than the control group, the difference was statistically significant (p<0.01). Intra-group comparison, post-extubation 12 h comparison post-extubation 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, the NRS scores showed a gradual downward trend, the difference was statistically significant (p<0.01). In the comparison of perioperative complications, the ERAS group had a lower postoperative infection incidence than the control group, the difference was statistically significant (44.4% vs 83.3%, p = 0.037). The ERAS group had lower postoperative delirium incidence than the control group, the difference was statistically significant (11.1% vs 50%, p = 0.014). There was no significant difference in the incidence of acute rejection, primary graft loss (PGD), gastrointestinal (GI) complications and airway complications between two groups (p>0.05).

Conclusion

The ERAS can be applied to lung transplant patients to relieve postoperative pain, shorten postoperative tube time, and shorten postoperative stay. Perioperative pulmonary rehabilitation exercises are beneficial to reducing the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications.

The effect of acupuncture on gastrointestinal recovery after abdominal surgery: a narrative review from clinical trials

Abdominal surgery is a critical surgery, with more and more attention being paid to postoperative life quality and associated complications in recent years. Among these complications, postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction is the most common complication of abdominal surgery. Acupuncture therapy is a treatment approach based on the Traditional Chinese Medicine theory, and its feasibility in aiding gastrointestinal recovery after abdominal surgery is supported by both Traditional Chinese Medicine theory and animal experiments. A lot of clinical research has been conducted to evaluate its efficacy, albeit with limitations, and at preliminary stages. Moreover, intervention timing, acupoint selection, and patient benefits should also be considered in clinical practices. This article summarizes the progress of clinical research on acupuncture therapy in gastrointestinal recovery after abdominal surgery and discusses related issues and operations, with the aim to provide new insights and prospects for the incorporation of acupuncture into the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol.

A Comparative Analysis between Enhanced Recovery after Surgery and Traditional Care in the Management of Obstructive Colorectal Cancer

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) represents evidence-based transformation in perioperative care, which has been demonstrated to reduce both recovery times and postoperative complication rates. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical significance of the ERAS program in comparison with conventional postoperative care. This longitudinal cohort observational study enrolled 120 consecutive patients diagnosed with intestinal obstruction caused by colorectal cancers, with 40 patients in the ERAS group and 80 patients receiving conventional postoperative care forming the non-ERAS group. Our study compares the effectiveness of ERAS protocols to non-ERAS methods, focusing on the time to first flatus, defecation, the resumption of normal diet, and early mobilization. The main endpoints are morbidity and hospitalization length. The results showed that despite a longer admission-to-surgery interval in the ERAS group, median hospitalization was significantly shorter compared to the non-ERAS group (p = 0.0002). The ERAS group showed a tendency towards a lower incidence of overall postoperative complications, indicating that implementing the ERAS protocol does not increase the risk of postoperative complications, ensuring the safety of enhanced recovery strategies for patients. Also, ERAS patients had notably fewer stomas than those in the non-ERAS group, indicating the potential effectiveness of reducing stoma necessity. This study shows that ERAS surpasses conventional care for colonic or rectal surgery patients, reducing hospital stays and costs while enhancing recovery. This highlights the comprehensive advantages of adopting ERAS in surgical settings.

Enhanced recovery after surgery-based nursing in older patients with postoperative intestinal obstruction after gastric cancer surgery: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer-related morbidity and mortality rates are high in China. Patients who have undergone gastric cancer surgery should receive six cycles of chemotherapy according to their condition. During this period, intestinal obstruction is likely to occur. Electrolyte balance disorders, peritonitis, intestinal necrosis, and even hypovolemic shock and septic shock can seriously affect the physical and mental recovery of patients and threaten their health and quality of life (QoL).

AIM

To quantitatively explore the effects of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS)–based nursing on anxiety, depression, and QoL of elderly patients with postoperative intestinal obstruction after gastric cancer.

METHODS

The clinical data of 129 older patients with intestinal obstruction after gastric cancer surgery who were treated and cared for in our hospital between January 2019 and December 2021 were examined retrospectively. Nine patients dropped out because of transfer, relocation, or death. According to the order of admissions, the patients were categorized into either a comparison group or an observation group according to the random number table, with 60 cases in each group.

RESULTS

After nursing care, the observation group required significantly less time to eat for the first time, recover bowel sounds, pass gas, and defecate than the comparison group (P < 0.05). No significant difference was noted in nutrition-related indicators between the two groups before care. Before care, the Symptom Check List-90 scores between the two groups were comparable, whereas anxiety, depression, paranoia, fear, hostility, obsession, somatization, interpersonal sensitivity, and psychotic scores were significantly lower in the observation group after care (P < 0.05). The QoL scores between the two groups before care did not differ significantly. After care, the physical, social, physiological, and emotional function scores; mental health score; vitality score; and general health score were significantly higher in the observation group, whereas the somatic pain score was significantly lower in the observation group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

ERAS-based nursing combined with conventional nursing interventions can effectively improve patient’s QoL, negative emotions, and nutritional status; accelerate the time to first ventilation; and promote intestinal function recovery in elderly patients with postoperative intestinal obstruction after gastric cancer surgery.

Suture reinforcement using a modified cyanoacrylate glue to prevent anastomotic leak in colorectal surgery: a prospective multicentre randomized trial : The Rectal Anastomotic seaL (ReAL) trial

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic leakage (AL) is the most frequent life-threating complication following colorectal surgery. Several attempts have been made to prevent AL. This prospective, randomized, multicentre trial aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of nebulised modified cyanoacrylate in preventing AL after rectal surgery.

METHODS

Patients submitted to colorectal surgery for carcinoma of the high-medium rectum across five high-volume centres between June 2021 and January 2023 entered the study and were randomized into group A (anastomotic reinforcement with cyanoacrylate) and group B (no reinforcement) and followed up for 30 days. Anastomotic reinforcement was performed via nebulisation of 1 mL of a modified cyanoacrylate glue. Preoperative features and intraoperative and postoperative results were recorded and compared. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ID number NCT03941938).

RESULTS

Out of 152 patients, 133 (control group, n = 72; cyanoacrylate group, n = 61) completed the follow-up. ALs were detected in nine patients (12.5%) in the control group (four grade B and five grade C) and in four patients (6.6%), in the cyanoacrylate group (three grade B and one grade C); however, despite this trend, the differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.36). However, Clavien-Dindo complications grade > 2 were significantly higher in the control group (12.5% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.04). No adverse effects related to the glue application were reported.

CONCLUSION

The role of modified cyanoacrylate application in AL prevention remains unclear. However its use to seal colorectal anastomoses is safe and could help to reduce severe postoperative complications.

Pilot Study to Optimize Goal-directed Hemodynamic Management During Pancreatectomy

INTRODUCTION

Intraoperative goal-directed hemodynamic therapy (GDHT) is a cornerstone of enhanced recovery protocols. We hypothesized that use of an advanced noninvasive intraoperative hemodynamic monitoring system to guide GDHT may decrease intraoperative hypotension (IOH) and improve perfusion during pancreatic resection.

METHODS

The monitor uses machine learning to produce the Hypotension Prediction Index to predict hypotensive episodes. A clinical decision-making algorithm uses the Hypotension Prediction Index and hemodynamic data to guide intraoperative fluid versus pressor management. Pre-implementation (PRE), patients were placed on the monitor and managed per usual. Post-implementation (POST), anesthesia teams were educated on the algorithm and asked to use the GDHT guidelines. Hemodynamic data points were collected every 20 s (8942 PRE and 26,638 POST measurements). We compared IOH (mean arterial pressure <65 mmHg), cardiac index >2, and stroke volume variation <12 between the two groups.

RESULTS

10 patients were in the PRE and 24 in the POST groups. In the POST group, there were fewer minimally invasive resections (4.2% versus 30.0%, P = 0.07), more pancreaticoduodenectomies (75.0% versus 20.0%, P < 0.01), and longer operative times (329.0 + 108.2 min versus 225.1 + 92.8 min, P = 0.01). After implementation, hemodynamic parameters improved. There was a 33.3% reduction in IOH (5.2% ± 0.1% versus 7.8% ± 0.3%, P < 0.01, a 31.6% increase in cardiac index >2.0 (83.7% + 0.2% versus 63.6% + 0.5%, P < 0.01), and a 37.6% increase in stroke volume variation <12 (73.2% + 0.3% versus 53.2% + 0.5%, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Advanced intraoperative hemodynamic monitoring to predict IOH combined with a clinical decision-making tree for GDHT may improve intraoperative hemodynamic parameters during pancreatectomy. This warrants further investigation in larger studies.

Evaluating the effect of preoperative interventions on sleep health in the perioperative period: a systematic review

Surgery and general anaesthesia have deleterious effects on sleep and disrupted perioperative sleep health is a risk factor for poor surgical outcomes. The objective of this systematic review was to summarise preoperative interventions that report sleep outcomes. Studies that delivered an intervention initiated >24 h prior to surgery among an adult sample without a diagnosed sleep disorder were included. Studies were excluded if they were preclinical or were not published in English. MEDLINE, MEDLINE ePubs Ahead of Print and In-process Citations, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, APA PsycINFO, CINAHL, and the Web of Science were searched on February 2, 2023. This review was reported in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (identifier: CRD42021260578). Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of Bias 2 tool for randomised trials and the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions for non-randomised trials. Certainty of findings were assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework. The searching yielded 10,938 total citations, and after screening resulted in 28 randomised and 19 non-randomised trials (47 total) with 4937 participants. Sleep was a primary outcome in 16 trials; a sleep outcome was significantly improved relative to comparator in 23 trials. This review demonstrates that preoperative sleep is modifiable via a variety of interventions, including pharmacological, non-pharmacological, and nursing interventions delivered preoperatively or perioperatively. Our results should be considered with caution due to an overall intermediate to high risk of bias in the included trials, and low to very low certainty of evidence. This review supports the modifiability of sleep health among surgical patients and provides the groundwork for preoperative sleep optimisation research.

The impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) on opioid consumption and postoperative pain levels in elective spine surgery

OBJECTIVE

Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocols were developed to counteract the adverse effects of the surgical stress response, aiming for quicker postoperative recovery. Initially applied in abdominal surgeries, ERAS principles have extended to orthopedic spine surgery, but research in this area is still in its infancy. The current study investigated the impact of ERAS on postoperative pain and opioid consumption in elective spine surgeries.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective study of patients undergoing elective spine surgery from May 2019 to July 2020. Patients were categorized into two groups: those enrolled in the ERAS pathway and those adhering to traditional surgical protocols. Data on demographics, comorbidities, length of stay (LOS), surgical procedures, and postoperative outcomes were collected. Postoperative pain was evaluated using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), while opioid utilization was quantified in morphine milligram equivalents (MME). NRS and MME were averaged for each patient across all days under observation. Differences in outcomes between groups (ERAS vs. treatment as usual) were tested using the Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables and Pearson's or Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables.

RESULTS

The median of patient's mean daily NRS scores for postoperative pain were not statistically significantly different between groups (median = 5.55 (ERAS) and 5.28 (non-ERAS), p=.2). Additionally, the median of patients' mean daily levels of MME were similar between groups (median = 17.24 (ERAS) and 16.44 (non-ERAS), p=.3) ERAS patients experienced notably shorter LOS (median=2 days) than their non-ERAS counterparts (median=3 days, p=.001). The effect of ERAS was moderated by whether the patient had ACDF surgery. ERAS (vs. non-ERAS) patients who had ACDF surgery had 1.64 lower average NRS (p=.006). ERAS (vs. non-ERAS) patients who had a different surgery had 0.72 higher average NRS (p=.02) but had almost half the length of stay, on average (p<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The current study underscores the dynamic nature of ERAS protocols within the realm of spine surgery. While ERAS demonstrates advantages such as reduced LOS and improved patient-reported outcomes, it requires careful implementation and customization to address the specific demands of each surgical discipline. The potential to expedite recovery, optimize resource utilization, and enhance patient satisfaction cannot be overstated. However, the fine balance between achieving these benefits and ensuring comprehensive patient care, especially in the context of postoperative pain management, must be maintained. As ERAS continues to evolve and find its place in diverse surgical domains, it is crucial for healthcare providers to remain attentive to patient needs, adapting ERAS protocols to suit individual patient populations and surgical contexts.

Adductor Canal Block Versus Femoral Nerve Block in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Network Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

The quality of postoperative analgesia in total knee arthroplasty is crucial for patient recovery, rehabilitation, and hospital stay duration. In line with the above, а single-shot adductor canal block has been considered as an improved method over continuous femoral nerve block. However, continuous adductor canal block and single-shot femoral nerve block have been not adequately addressed in the discussion. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of various types of adductor and femoral nerve blocks on clinically relevant outcomes in patients following total knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

A systematic review and network meta-analysis were conducted following "PRISMA-NMA" and Cochrane Handbook guidelines. The eligibility criteria included randomized trials and, where these were lacking for a comparison, nonrandomized studies involving adults undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty, comparing single-shot adductor canal block, continuous adductor canal block, single-shot femoral nerve block, and continuous femoral nerve block.

RESULTS

A total of 36 studies involving 3308 patients were included. Single-shot adductor canal block showed higher pain scores and opioid consumption but better functional recovery at 24 h compared with continuous femoral nerve block. However, this trend vanishes by the 48 h assessment postsurgery. Continuous adductor canal block required higher opioid consumption but better functional recovery and shorter hospital stay compared with continuous femoral nerve block. Single-shot adductor canal block showed higher pain scores but comparable opioid consumption and functional recovery to continuous adductor canal block.

DISCUSSION

The shift from continuous femoral nerve block to single-shot adductor canal block as the preferred method for pain relief after total knee arthroplasty may be premature. While the latter improves mobility, it falls short in pain control and does not shorten hospital stays. Continuous adductor canal block shows promise but is currently underappreciated, and single-shot femoral nerve block is often overshadowed by other techniques in regional anesthesia. Further high-quality, multicenter randomized controlled trials are needed to validate these findings.

A retrospective study on the efficacy of the ERAS protocol in patients who underwent laparoscopic left and right colectomy surgeries

Objective

Retrospective analysis and comparison of the effects of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol for patients having left and right colectomy surgeries.

Method

Out of the patients admitted to Chengdu Shang Jin Nan Fu Hospital and West China Hospital from December 2019 to December 2022, a total of 498 who met the inclusion criteria were selected, 255 with right colectomy(RC) and 243 with left colectomy (LC). Under the conditions of strict compliance with ERAS protocol, the relevant physical indexes of RC and LC, including postoperative rehabilitation (especially median post-operative stay) and complications (especially prolonged postoperative ileus, PPOI), were statistically analyzed and compared.

Results

In terms of intraoperative variables, fluid doses were higher in the LC group than in the RC group (P < 0.05), and there was no significant difference between them in terms of operative time, blood loss, need for open surgery, peritoneal contamination, epidural catheter placement, or opioid use (P > 0.05). Compared with the RC group, the LC group had a higher intake of oral liquid at the second postoperative day (POD), and faster first flatulence (P < 0.05). 30 (11.76%) RC patients required nasogastric tube insertion, while only 3 (1.23%) patients in the LC group required the same (P < 0.05). Prolonged postoperative ileus (PPOI) occurred in 48 (18.82%) and 29 (11.93%) patients in the RC and LC groups, respectively (P < 0.05). No significant differences in terms of postoperative complications or length of hospital stay (LoS). stay were observed.

Conclusion

As the location of colon cancer changes, the effectiveness of ERAS also varies. More personalized and precise ERAS protocols can reduce the incidence of postoperative complications and promote rapid recovery after surgery.

Implementation of an ERAS protocol on cirrhotic patients in liver resection: a cohort study

The development of laparoscopic liver surgery, the improvement in the perioperative care programs, and the surgical innovation have allowed liver resections on selected cirrhotic patients. However, the great majority of ERAS studies for liver surgery have been conducted on patients with normal liver parenchyma, while its application on cirrhotic patients is limited. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the implementation of an ERAS protocol in cirrhotic patients who underwent liver surgery. We present an analytical observational prospective cohort study, which included all adult patients who underwent a liver resection between December 2017 and December 2019 with an ERAS program. We compare the outcomes in patients cirrhotic (CG)/non-cirrhotic (NCG). A total of 101 patients were included. Thirty of these (29.7%) were patients ≥ 70 cirrhotic. 87% of the both groups had performed > 70% of the ERAS. Oral diet tolerance and mobilization on the first postoperative day were similar in both groups. The hospital stay was similar in both groups (2.9 days/2.99 days). Morbidity and mortality were similar; Clavien I-II (CG: 44% vs NCG: 30%) and Clavien ≥ III (CG: 3% vs NCG: 8%). Hospital re-entry was higher in the NCG. Overall mortality of the study was 1%. ERAS protocol compliance was associated with a decrease in complications (ERAS < 70%: 80% vs ERAS > 90%: 20%; p: 0.02) and decrease in severity of complications in both study groups. The application of the ERAS program in cirrhotic patients who undergo liver surgery is feasible, safe, and reproducible. It allows postoperative complications, mortality, hospital stay, and readmission rates comparable to those in standard patients.

ERAS following Gastrectomy for Octo- and Nonagenarians: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis

Background: The safety and efficacy of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) following elective gastrectomy for gastric cancer in patients >80 years of age are not well described. The aim of this study was to explore whether an ERAS protocol following gastrectomy in this age group can be safely implemented and reduce postoperative length of stay. Methods: A retrospective, single-center analysis was performed. All patients >80 years of age with gastric cancer undergoing elective subtotal and total gastrectomy between January 2010 and December 2021 were identified. With the implementation of an ERAS protocol in January 2016, patients treated beforehand were allocated to Group A (pre-ERAS) and Group B (ERAS). The length of stay, incidence of postoperative complications and representation/readmission to the hospital were compared between the groups. Results: Of the 221 patients identified, 56 met the inclusion criteria with 22 patients (39.3%) allocated to Group A and 34 patients (60.7%) to Group B. There were no differences with regard to the type of resection and surgical approach. Length of stay was shorter in Group B (5 days, range 2-27 versus 10 days, 3-109, P = .040). A trend toward more discharges by postoperative day 3 was noted among patients in Group B (7/34, 20.6% versus 2/22, 9.1%, P = .253). There were no differences in the incidence of postoperative complications or readmission hospital between the groups. Conclusion: Among patients >80 years of age, ERAS following gastrectomy for cancer is associated with a reduced length of stay and can be safely implemented.

Impacts of enhanced recovery after surgery nursing interventions on wound infection and complications following bladder cancer surgery: A meta-analysis

A meta-analysis was executed to comprehensively examine the impacts of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) care interventions on complications and wound infections following bladder cancer (BCa) surgery. Computer searches were carried out in Embase, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Wanfang and CNKI, from their inception to November 2023, for RCTs regarding perioperative ERAS nursing interventions in patients with BCa. Two independent researchers performed literature screening, extracted data and carried out quality evaluations. Stata 17.0 software was utilized for the analysis of the data. Ultimately, 16 RCTs, involving 1190 patients, were included. The analysis showed that, in comparison with conventional nursing methods, perioperative ERAS nursing application in patients with BCa remarkably decreased the occurrence of wound infections (OR: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.16-0.59) and complications (OR: 0.19, 95% CI: 0.13-0.28). Our study indicates that perioperative care based on the ERAS concept remarkably decreased the occurrence of wound infections and complications following BCa surgery, demonstrating notable nursing efficacy and meriting widespread clinical promotion.

Clinical study of enhanced recovery after surgery in laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol is a comprehensive management modality that promotes patient recovery, especially in the patients undergoing digestive tumor surgeries. However, it is less commonly used in the appendectomy.

AIM

To study the application value of ERAS in laparoscopic surgery for acute appendicitis.

METHODS

A total of 120 patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy due to acute appendicitis were divided into experimental group and control group by random number table method, including 63 patients in the experimental group and 57 patients in the control group. Patients in the experimental group were managed with the ERAS protocol, and those in the control group were received the traditional treatment. The exhaust time, the hospitalization duration, the hospitalization expense and the pain score between the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in age, gender, body mass index and Sunshine Appendicitis Grading System score between the experimental group and the control group (P > 0.05). Compared to the control group, the patients in the experimental group had earlier exhaust time, shorter hospitalization time, less hospitalization cost and lower degree of pain sensation. The differences were statistically significant (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

ERAS could significantly accelerate the recovery of patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis, shorten the hospitalization time and reduce hospitalization costs. It is a safe and effective approach.

Post-operative nursing activities to prevent wound complications in patients undergoing colorectal surgeries: A scoping review

AIMS

To identify postoperative interventions and quality improvement initiatives used to prevent wound complications in patients undergoing colorectal surgeries, the types of activities nurses undertake in these interventions/initiatives and how these activities align with nurses' scope of practice.

DESIGN

A scoping review.

DATA SOURCES

Three health databases were searched, and backward and forward citation searching occurred in April 2022. Research and quality improvement initiatives included focussed on adult patients undergoing colorectal surgery, from 2010 onwards. Data were extracted about study characteristics, nursing activities and outcomes. The 'Dimensions of the scope of nursing practice' framework was used to classify nursing activities and then the Patterns, Advances, Gaps, Evidence for practice and Research recommendations framework was used to synthesise the review findings.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven studies were included. These studies often reported negative wound pressure therapy and surgical site infection bundle interventions/initiatives. Nurses' scope of practice was most frequently 'Technical procedure and delegated medical care' meaning nurses frequently acted under doctors' orders, with the most common delegated activity being dressing removal.

CONCLUSION

The full extent of possible interventions nurses could undertake independently in the postoperative period requires further exploration to improve wound outcomes and capitalise on nurses' professional role.

IMPACT STATEMENT

Nurses' role in preventing postoperative wound complications is unclear, which may inhibit their ability to influence postoperative outcomes. In the postoperative period, nurses undertake technical activities, under doctors' orders to prevent wound infections. For practice, nurses need to upkeep and audit their technical skills. New avenues for researchers include exploration of independent activities for postoperative nurses and the outcomes of these activities.

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE

There may be opportunities to broaden nurses' scope of practice to act more autonomously to prevent wound complication.

REPORTING METHOD

Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

A health consumer interpreted the data and prepared the manuscript.

Effects of evidence-based nursing care interventions on wound pain and wound complications following surgery for finger tendon injury

We conducted this study aimed to examine the impact of evidence-based nursing interventions on postoperative wound pain and complications after surgery for finger tendon injury. A total of 86 patients treated for finger tendon injuries at our hospital from January 2021 to October 2023 were selected and randomly divided into an experimental group and a control group. The control group received conventional nursing care, while the experimental group received evidence-based nursing interventions. The study compared the postoperative wound pain intensity, incidence of complications and patient satisfaction with nursing care between the two groups. The analysis revealed that compared with conventional care, evidence-based nursing interventions significantly reduced the level of wound pain (p = 0.034) and the incidence of complications (4.65% vs. 18.60%, p = 0.043). It also increased patient satisfaction with the nursing care (97.67% vs. 83.72%, p = 0.026). The study indicates that the application of evidence-based nursing interventions for patients with finger tendon injuries can reduce postoperative wound pain, decrease the incidence of complications and enhance patient satisfaction with nursing care.

Hospital-level variation in hospitalization costs for spinal fusion in the United States

BACKGROUND

With a growing emphasis on value of care, understanding factors associated with rising healthcare costs is increasingly important. In this national study, we evaluated the degree of center-level variation in the cost of spinal fusion.

METHODS

All adults undergoing elective spinal fusion were identified in the 2016 to 2020 National Inpatient Sample. Multilevel mixed-effect models were used to rank hospitals based on risk-adjusted costs. The interclass coefficient (ICC) was utilized to tabulate the amount of variation attributable to hospital-level characteristics. The association of high cost-hospital (HCH) status with in-hospital mortality, perioperative complications, and overall resource utilization was analyzed. Predictors of increased costs were secondarily explored.

RESULTS

An estimated 1,541,740 patients underwent spinal fusion, and HCH performed an average of 9.5% of annual cases. HCH were more likely to be small (36.8 vs 30.5%, p<0.001), rural (10.1 vs 8.8%, p<0.001), and located in the Western geographic region (49.9 vs 16.7%, p<0.001). The ICC demonstrated 32% of variation in cost was attributable to the hospital, independent of patient-level characteristics. Patients who received a spinal fusion at a HCH faced similar odds of mortality (0.74 [0.48-1.15], p = 0.18) and perioperative complications (1.04 [0.93-1.16], p = 0.52), but increased odds of non-home discharge (1.30 [1.17-1.45], p<0.001) and prolonged length of stay (β 0.34 [0.26-0.42] days, p = 0.18). Patient factors such as gender, race, and income quartile significantly impacted costs.

CONCLUSION

The present analysis identified 32% of the observed variation to be attributable to hospital-level characteristics. HCH status was not associated with increased mortality or perioperative complications.

The 50% and 95% effective dose of remimazolam tosilate for anaesthesia induction in sleep disorders patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an up-and-down sequential allocation trial

PURPOSE

Previous reports argue that preoperative sleep conditions of patients can influence the dosage of general anaesthesia drugs. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the dose-effect relationship of preoperative sleep disorders on the induction of general anaesthesia with remimazolam tosilate and calculate the Median effective (ED50) and 95% effective (ED95) dosages.

METHODS

Included in our study were 56 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy at our hospital. A separate group of 27 patients with sleep disorders (SD group) and 29 patients without sleep disorders (NSD group) using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) were also included. According to the Dixon 'up-and-down' design, patients received remimazolam at preselected concentrations starting at 0.2 mg/kg. After the administration of remimazolam, loss of consciousness was observed. By observing whether consciousness disappeared within a minute, we adjusted the dose of remimazolam by 0.1 mg/kg (up and down) in the following patient. The Median effective dose (ED50), 95% effective dose (ED95), and 95% confidence interval (CI) of remimazolam for effective sedation were calculated.

RESULTS

The ED50 of remimazolam was 0.226 mg/kg (95%CI 0.221-0.232 mg/kg) in the SD group and 0.191 mg/kg (95%CI, 0.183-0.199 mg/kg) in the NSD group. The ED95 of remimazolam was 0.237 mg/kg (95%CI 0.231-0.262 mg/kg) in the SD group and 0.209 mg/kg (95%CI 0.200-0.254 mg/kg) in the NSD group.

CONCLUSIONS

In the SD group, the ED50 and ED95 of remimazolam during anaesthesia induction were 0.226 and 0.237 mg/kg, respectively. The induction dose of remimazolam in the SD group was significantly higher than that in the NSD group.

Effects of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol on the postoperative stress state and short-term complications in elderly patients with colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and necessity of enhanced recovery after surgery in elderly patients with colorectal cancer by observing inflammatory markers and postoperative complications.

METHODS

Hospitalized colorectal cancer patients from the Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University from January 2021 to September 2022 were included in the study and divided into two groups: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) and non-ERAS. Data on postoperative inflammatory markers and complications were also collected.

RESULTS

A total of 313 patients with colorectal cancer were included: 182 in the ERAS group and 131 in the non-ERAS group. The patients in the ERAS group had significantly shorter days of postoperative hospitalization, urinary catheter and drainage tube withdrawal times, and recovery of bowel function (P < .05) than those of the non-ERAS group. Moreover, the ERAS group had lower hospitalization expenses than those of the non-ERAS group (P < .05). However, the procalcitonin and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α levels in the ERAS group was significantly lower than those in the non-ERAS group on postoperative days 1 and 3 (P < .05), and the interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-10 levels in the ERAS group were significantly lower than those in the non-ERAS group on the 1st, 3rd, and 5th postoperative days (P < .05). The C-reactive protein (CRP) and white blood cell (WBC) levels in the ERAS group were lower than those in the non-ERAS group on postoperative days 3 and 5 (P < .05). However, the hemoglobin levels did not differ significantly (P > .05). The albumin levels did not differ significantly between the two groups before surgery (P > .05); however, the albumin level in the ERAS group was higher than that in the non-ERAS group on postoperative days 3 and 5 (P < .05). The ERAS patients had lower albumin levels after surgery than those of the non-ERAS patients (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

ERAS leads to a series of perioperative optimization measures, thereby reducing the postoperative stress response in elderly patients with colorectal cancer and the occurrence of perioperative complications.

Logistic Regression Is Non-Inferior to the Response Surface Model in Patient Response Prediction of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

Response surface models (RSMs) are a new trend in modern anesthesia. RSMs have demonstrated significant applicability in the field of anesthesia. However, the comparative analysis between RSMs and logistic regression (LR) in different surgeries remains relatively limited in the current literature. We hypothesized that using a total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) technique with the response surface model (RSM) and logistic regression (LR) would predict the emergence from anesthesia in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracotomy surgery (VATS). This study aimed to prove that LR, like the RSM, can be used to improve patient safety and achieve enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS). This was a prospective, observational study with data reanalysis. Twenty-nine patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class II and III) who underwent VATS for elective pulmonary or mediastinal surgery under TIVA were enrolled. We monitored the emergence from anesthesia, and the precise time point of regained response (RR) was noted. The influence of varying concentrations was examined and incorporated into both the RSM and LR. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve area for Greco and LR models was 0.979 (confidence interval: 0.987 to 0.990) and 0.989 (confidence interval: 0.989 to 0.990), respectively. The two models had no significant differences in predicting the probability of regaining response. In conclusion, the LR model was effective and can be applied to patients undergoing VATS or other procedures of similar modalities. Furthermore, the RSM is significantly more sophisticated and has an accuracy similar to that of the LR model; however, the LR model is more accessible. Therefore, the LR model is a simpler tool for predicting arousal in patients undergoing VATS under TIVA with Remifentanil and Propofol.

Reduced length of intensive care unit stay and early mechanical ventilator weaning with enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in free fibula flap surgery

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program on postoperative recovery of patients who underwent free fibula flap surgery for mandibular reconstruction. This retrospective study included 188 patients who underwent free fibula flap surgery for complex mandibular and soft tissue defects between January 2011 and December 2022. We divided them into two groups: the ERAS group, consisting of 36 patients who were treated according to the ERAS program introduced from 2021 to 2022. Propensity score matching was used for the non-ERAS group, which comprised 36 cases selected from 152 patients between 2011 and 2020, based on age, sex, and smoking history. After propensity score matching, the ERAS and non-ERAS groups included 36 patients each. The primary outcome was the length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay; the secondary outcomes were flap complications, unplanned reoperation, 30-day readmission, postoperative ventilator use length, surgical site infections, incidence of delirium within ICU, lower-limb comorbidities, and morbidity parameters. There were no significant differences in the demographic characteristics of the patients. However, the ERAS group showed the lower length of intensive care unit stay (ERAS vs non-ERAS: 8.66 ± 3.90 days vs. 11.64 ± 5.42 days, P = 0.003) and post-operative ventilator use days (ERAS vs non-ERAS: 1.08 ± 0.28 days vs. 2.03 ± 1.05 days, P < 0.001). Other secondary outcomes were not significantly different between the two groups. Additionally, patients in the ERAS group had lower postoperative morbidity parameters, such as postoperative nausea, vomiting, urinary tract infections, and pulmonary complications (P = 0.042). The ERAS program could be beneficial and safe for patients undergoing free fibula flap surgery for mandibular reconstruction, thereby improving their recovery and not increasing flap complications and 30-day readmission.

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in colorectal surgery: implementation is still beneficial despite modern surgical and anesthetic care

PURPOSE

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have shown beneficial outcomes in the last 20 years. Nevertheless, simultaneously implemented technical improvements such as minimally invasive access or modified anesthesia care may play a crucial role in optimizing patient outcome. The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of ERAS implementation in a highly specialized colorectal center.

METHODS

This is a propensity score matched single-center study comparing the short-term outcomes of patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery in a society-indepedent ERAS program from January 2021 to August 2022 to standard perioperative care from January 2019 to December 2020.

RESULTS

Four hundred fifty-six patients were included in the propensity score matched analysis with 228 patients per group (ERAS vs. standard care). Minimally invasive access was used in 80.2% vs. 77.6% (p = 0.88), and there were 16.6% vs. 18.8% (p = 0.92) rectal procedures in the ERAS and standard care group, respectively. Major complications occurred in 10.1% vs. 11.4% (p = 0.65) and anastomotic leakage demanding operative revision in 2.2% vs. 2.6% (p = 0.68) in the ERAS and standard care group, respectively. ERAS lead to a lower number of non-surgical complications compared to standard care (57 vs. 79; p = 0.02). Mean length of stay (LOS) and mean costs per case were lower in ERAS compared to standard care (9.2 ± 5.6 days vs. 12.7 ± 7.4 days, p < 0.01; costs 33,727 ± 15,883 USD vs. 40,309 ± 29,738 USD, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The implementation of an ERAS protocol may lead to a reduction of LOS, costs, and a lower number of non-surgical complications even in a highly specialized colorectal unit using modern surgical and anesthetic care. ( ClinialTrials.gov number NCT05773248).

Enhanced recovery after surgery pathways for deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) surgery is one of the most difficult breast reconstruction techniques available, both in terms of operating complexity and patient recovery. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways were recently introduced in numerous subspecialties to reduce recovery time, patient pain, and cost by providing multimodal perioperative care. Plastic surgery has yet to widely integrate ERAS with DIEP reconstruction, mostly due to insufficient data on patient outcomes with this combined approach.

METHODS

Five major medical databases were queried using predetermined search criteria according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement. Statistical analysis was performed using Cochrane's RevMan (v5.4).

RESULTS

A total of 466 articles were identified. A total of 14 studies were included in the review with a combined sample of 2102 patients. Eight studies were included in the meta-analysis with a combined sample of 1679 patients. On average, the included studies utilized 11.69 of 18 suggested protocols for ERAS with breast reconstruction. Our primary outcome, length of stay, was reduced by a mean of 1.12 (95% confidence interval [CI] [-1.30, -0.94], n = 1627, p < 0.001) days in the ERAS group. Postoperative oral morphine equivalents (OME) were also reduced in the ERAS group by 104.02 (95% CI [-181.43, -26.61], n = 545, p = 0.008) OME. The ERAS group saw a significant 3.54 (95% CI [-4.43, -2.65], n = 527, p < 0.001) standardized mean difference cost reduction relative to the control groups. The surgery time was reduced by 60.46 (95% CI [-125, 4.29], n = 624, p < 0.07) min, although this was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The ERAS pathway in DIEP breast reconstruction is consistently associated with reduced hospital stay, opioid use, and patient cost. Moreover, there appears to be no evidence of serious adverse outcomes associated with the application of the ERAS protocol.

Role of Cardiac Anesthesiologists in Intraoperative Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery (ERACS) Protocol: A Retrospective Single-Center Study Analyzing Preliminary Results of a Yearlong ERACS Protocol Implementation

INTRODUCTION

Enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery (ERACS) has been gaining rapid acceptance after multiple studies have demonstrated promising results in improved outcomes of enhanced recovery after surgery in other surgical fields (eg, colorectal, orthopedic, thoracic, etc). Cardiac surgery has several unique challenges, including sternotomy, cardiopulmonary bypass and associated coagulopathy, blood transfusion, and postoperative intensive care requirement. Nonetheless, selective cardiac surgical patients can still benefit from ERACS. Guidelines for perioperative care in cardiac surgery, previously published by the ERACS Society, are weighted heavily in preoperative and postoperative management without much focus on intraoperative care provided by anesthesiologists. To address this gap and to explore anesthesiology's contribution in achieving ERACS, the study authors' cardiac anesthesiology division, in collaboration with cardiac surgery, introduced the ERACS protocol in their institution in February 2020.

METHODS

The cardiac anesthesiology division, in collaboration with cardiac surgery, introduced the ERACS protocol consisting of multimodal opioid-sparing analgesia, including the introduction of regional blocks, hemostasis management protocol, reversal of neuromuscular blockade, and administration of antiemetics in the authors' institution in February 2020. They have conducted a retrospective chart review study comparing patients who have received ERACS measures with a similar historic cohort who underwent cardiac surgery prior to initiation of an ERACS protocol. The primary outcomes of the study were to determine patients' time to extubation, postoperative opioid consumption, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), and incidence of postoperative complications (eg, postoperative nausea vomiting [PONV], bleeding, ICU readmission, delirium.

RESULTS

The ERACS patients showed reduced opioid consumption (intraoperative fentanyl; postoperative fentanyl, as well as oxycodone, in the first 6 hours postoperatively), lesser mechanical ventilation (2.5 hours less), shorter ICU stays (5 hours less), shorter hospital LOS (1 day), and lesser incidence of PONV. None of the ERACS patients required blood transfusion. The study authors performed an anonymous survey among the anesthesiologists and ICU providers to assess providers' satisfaction, which showed 92% of survey takers agreed that the ERACS protocol should be continued for future cardiac patients, and 61% of survey takers reported superior pain control in ERACS group of patients while managing those patients.

DISCUSSION

The ERACS is achievable after the careful implementation of a series of measures. It does not signify only fast-track extubation and opioid-sparing analgesia, and must be implemented in the entire perioperative period beginning from preoperative clinic to postoperative rehabilitation. Cardiac anesthesiologists play a vital role in execution of intraoperative ERACS measures. Both providers and patients themselves are key stakeholders. A larger randomized prospective trial is warranted to solidify the inference.

An evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program for patients undergoing colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Introduction

The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol reduces surgery-related stress and hospital stays for complicated surgical patients. It speeds recovery, reduces readmissions, and lowers morbidity and mortality. However, the efficacy of ERAS in colorectal surgery is still debatable.

Aim

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the ERAS program for patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

Material and methods

PRISMA-compliant searches were performed on Medline, Embase, PubMed, the Web of Sciences, and the Cochrane Database up to March 2023. The included articles compared ERAS protocol results for colorectal surgery patients to those of conventional care. RevMan was used for the meta-analysis, and the Cochrane RoB Tool was used to assess the study quality.

Results

The meta-analysis included 12 randomized controlled trials with a total of 1920 participants. There were 880 individuals in ERAS care and 1002 in conventional care. Weighted mean difference: -1.07 days, 95% confidence interval (CI): -1.53 to -0.60, p = 0.00001), overall length of stay: -4.12 days, 95% CI: -5.86 to -2.38, p = 0.00001), and post-operative hospital stay: -1.91 days, 95% CI: -4.73 to -0.91, p = 0.00001). Readmissions were higher in the ERAS group than in the normal care group (odds ratio (OR) = 1.20, 95% CI: 0.82 to 1.75, p = 0.35). Post-operative complications were lower in the ERAS care group (OR = 0.42; 95% CI: 0.27 to 0.65, p < 0.0001) and SSIs (OR = 0.75; 95% CI 0.52 to 1.08, p = 0.00001) than in the routine care group.

Conclusions

Care provided in line with the ERAS protocol has been shown to be successful and beneficial for patients following colorectal surgery, because it minimizes post-operative problems and length of hospital stay, and improves outcomes.

Predicting Postoperative Complications in Patients Undergoing Colorectal Surgery with an Enhanced Recovery Pathway

BACKGROUND

Reducing postoperative complications is the essential requirement of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program. This study aimed to identify the key perioperative components affecting postoperative complications in patients undergoing colorectal surgery with ERAS.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included all patients who underwent major colorectal surgery with ERAS program between February 2019 and June 2020, all perioperative information was retrieved from a database. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify predictors for complications within 30 days postoperatively, and a nomogram model was drawn to visualize the model. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and calibration curve were used to evaluate the model performance.

RESULTS

We enrolled 649 patients and 72 patients (11.1%) had at least 1 complication within 30 days postoperatively. Multivariate analyses showed that minimally invasive surgery [odds ratio (OR) 0.323; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.168-0.620] was associated with a decreased of the complications. However, preoperative anemia (OR 2.052; 95%CI 1.073-3.928) and old age (OR 1.927; 95%CI 1.022-3.632) were independent risk factors for complications within 30 days postoperatively. The C-index of the nomogram was 0.735 (95%CI 0.694-0.776). Calibration curve showed a relatively good agreement between predicted value and observed outcome. In the validation set, the nomogram showed an area under the ROC curve of 0.729 (95%CI 0.680-0.778).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that preoperative anemia, old age and minimally invasive surgery may individually influence the prognosis of patients undergoing major colorectal surgery with an enhanced recovery pathway. Trial registration Clinical Trial Registry (number: ChiCTR2000037513).