Safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of a single ascending dose of pradefovir, a novel liver-targeting, anti-hepatitis B virus drug, in healthy Chinese subjects

New drugs approved by the NMPA in 2024: Synthesis and clinical applications

In 2024, the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) approved 46 Class 1 or 1.1 innovative drugs, including 7 imported drugs and 39 domestically developed drugs, marking a new record in China's pharmaceutical innovation. These approvals encompassed 23 chemical drugs, 20 biological products, and 3 traditional Chinese medicines or natural products, demonstrating continuous growth in innovative drug development. Compared to 16 approvals in 2020 and the surge in 2021, when approvals equaled the total of the previous four years, the trend of increased approvals has resumed since 2024. Therapeutically, oncology drugs remained the dominant category in 2024, comprising 50 % (23/46) of approvals. Gastrointestinal and metabolic drugs, accounting for 13.04 % (6/46), surpassed other categories to rank second, followed by neurological drugs (8.7 %, 4/46). Anti-infectives, miscellaneous drugs, and traditional Chinese medicines each contributed three approvals (7.5 % each). Regulatory advancements played a significant role, with 18 drugs (39.13 %) approved via priority reviews, emergency reviews, or conditional approvals. This group included 9 chemical drugs and 9 biological products, with notable breakthrough therapies such as taletrectinib, lutetium monoclonal antibodies, and donanemab receiving special recognition. The 2024 data reflect China's growing capabilities in drug innovation and its commitment to addressing critical medical needs through accelerated regulatory pathways.

Pradefovir Treatment in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B: Week 24 Results From a Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Noninferiority, Phase 2 Trial

BACKGROUND

Pradefovir is a liver-targeted prodrug of adefovir, a nucleoside/nucleotide analogue with antiviral activity against hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA polymerase. This phase 2 study compared the efficacy and safety of oral pradefovir (30, 45, 60, or 75 mg) versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF; 300 mg) and aimed to identify the most appropriate dose of pradefovir for the forthcoming phase 3 study.

METHODS

Treatment-naive and experienced (not on treatment >6 months) patients with chronic hepatitis B were eligible.

RESULTS

A total of 240 participants were randomized and treated in the study (48 per group). Approximately 80% were hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) positive, and 10% had liver cirrhosis. The reductions from baseline in HBV DNA levels achieved at week 24 were 5.40, 5.34, 5.33, and 5.40 log10 IU/mL, with pradefovir doses of 30-, 45-, 60-, and 75-mg, respectively, compared with 5.12 log10 IU/mL with TDF. However, HBeAg loss was attained by more participants who received 45-, 60-, or 75-mg pradefovir than by those receiving TDF (12%, 6%, and 9% vs 3%). The TDF group exhibited a more significant increase in serum creatinine than the pradefovir 30- and 45-mg groups, and serum phosphate levels were comparable among all groups. Most adverse events (AEs) were mild (grade 1). No treatment-related severe AEs were reported. Overall, AEs and laboratory abnormalities were comparable to those in the TDF group.

CONCLUSIONS

Pradefovir and TDF exhibited comparable reductions in HBV DNA levels. All treatments were safe and well tolerated.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT00230503 and China Drug Trials CTR2018042.

First-In-Human Study on Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Single and Multiple Escalating Doses of Hepenofovir, a Novel Hepatic Targeting Prodrug of Tenofovir in Healthy Chinese Subjects

Objective: Hepenofovir, a novel hepatic targeting prodrug of tenofovir, has been developed for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB). This is a first-in-human study to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) and tolerability of single and multiple escalating doses of hepenofovir in healthy Chinese subjects. Methods: This phase Ia study included two parts: a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled single-ascending-dose (SAD) (25-200 mg) study under fasted conditions comprising a food-effect investigation (200 mg) and a multiple-ascending-dose (MAD) (25 mg) study under fasted conditions. Results: Hepenofovir was well tolerated in healthy Chinese subjects. There was no significant difference in adverse reaction rates between hepenofovir and placebo groups. Hepenofovir was rapidly absorbed and metabolized into tenofovir after dosing. In healthy participants, the median Tmax of hepenofovir and tenofovir was 0.33-0.50 h and 0.62-0.75 h, respectively, and their mean half-life was 2.5-12.3 h and 49.7-53.8 h, respectively. Systemic exposure to tenofovir increased in proportion to the dose. The mean accumulation indexes of hepenofovir and tenofovir were 1.1 vs. 1.8. Moreover, food could reduce the Cmax of both hepenofovir and tenofovir, but did not affect their area under the curve (AUC). Conclusions: Hepenofovir has shown a favorable safety and PK profile, which support the further evaluation of its safety and efficacy in CHB patients. Clinical trial registration number: The trial is registered at Chinese Clinical Trial website (http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/index.html # CTR20191953).

Review article: hepatitis B-current and emerging therapies

BACKGROUND

The hepatitis B virus (HBV) affects an estimated 290 million individuals worldwide and is responsible for approximately 900 000 deaths annually, mostly from complications of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Although current treatment is effective at preventing complications of chronic hepatitis B, it is not curative, and often must be administered long term. There is a need for safe, effective, finite duration curative therapy.

AIM

Our aim was to provide a concise, up to date review of all currently available and emerging treatment options for chronic hepatitis B.

METHODS

We conducted a search of PubMed, clinicaltrials.gov, major meeting abstracts and pharmaceutical websites for publications and communications on current and emerging therapies for HBV.

RESULTS

Currently approved treatment options for chronic hepatitis B include peginterferon alpha-2a and nucleos(t)ide analogues. Both options do not offer a 'complete cure' (clearance of covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) and integrated HBV DNA) and rarely achieve a 'functional cure' (hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss). An improved understanding of the viral lifecycle, immunopathogenesis and recent advances in drug delivery technologies have led to many novel therapeutic approaches that are currently being evaluated in clinical trials including targeting of viral entry, cccDNA, viral transcription, core protein, and release of HBsAg and HBV polymerase. Additionally, novel immunological approaches that include targeting the innate and adaptive immune system and therapeutic vaccination are being pursued.

CONCLUSION

The breadth and scope of novel therapies in development hold promise for regimen/s that will achieve functional cure.

HBV replication inhibitors

Chronic Hepatitis B Virus infections afflict >250 million people and kill nearly 1 million annually. Current non-curative therapies are dominated by nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) that profoundly but incompletely suppress DNA synthesis by the viral reverse transcriptase. Residual HBV replication during NA therapy contributes to maintenance of the critical nuclear reservoir of the HBV genome, the covalently-closed circular DNA, and to ongoing infection of naive cells. Identification of next-generation NAs with improved efficacy and safety profiles, often through novel prodrug approaches, is the primary thrust of ongoing efforts to improve HBV replication inhibitors. Inhibitors of the HBV ribonuclease H, the other viral enzymatic activity essential for viral genomic replication, are in preclinical development. The complexity of HBV's reverse transcription pathway offers many other potential targets. HBV's protein-priming of reverse transcription has been briefly explored as a potential target, as have the host chaperones necessary for function of the HBV reverse transcriptase. Improved inhibitors of HBV reverse transcription would reduce HBV's replication-dependent persistence mechanisms and are therefore expected to become a backbone of future curative combination anti-HBV therapies.

Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of pradefovir for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B infection

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Pradefovir is a liver targeted novel prodrug of adefovir (PMEA) developed to provide higher antiviral activity with reduced systemic toxicities. This study evaluated the tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and antiviral activity of pradefovir in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) virus infection.

METHODS

Non-cirrhotic, treatment-naïve subjects with CHB were divided into five groups (10 patients each) and randomized within each group in a ratio of 6:2:2 to receive an ascending dose of 30, 60, 75, 90, or 120 mg pradefovir, 10 mg adefovir dipivoxil (ADV), or 300 mg tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) once a day for 28 days.

RESULTS

A total of 51 subjects were randomized and 49 subjects completed the study. The groups were well matched and included 39 males, of whom 71% were hepatitis B e-antigen-negative with a mean hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA level of 6.4-7.16 log10 IU/mL. No subject experienced a serious adverse event or nephrotoxicity. The most frequently reported adverse event was asymptomatic reduction in blood cholinesterase levels in the pradefovir group which recovered without any treatment about 13 ± 7 days after drug discontinuation. This adverse event was not observed in the ADV and TDF groups. The mean changes in serum HBV DNA were -2.78, -2.77, -3.08, -3.18, -3.44, -2.34, and -3.07 log10 IU/mL at 30, 60, 75, 90, and 120 mg pradefovir, 10 mg ADV and 300 mg TDF, respectively, with plateau levels reached with 60 mg pradefovir. Pradefovir and its metabolite PMEA showed linear pharmacokinetics proportional to the dose. The half-life of PMEA in the pradefovir group was 11.47-17.63 h.

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term use of pradefovir was well tolerated. A decline in HBV DNA levels was superior to TDF at higher doses of pradefovir. 30-60 mg pradefovir is recommended for CHB treatment.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

CTR20150224.

Phosphonate prodrugs: an overview and recent advances

Phosphonates, often used as isosteric replacements for phosphates, can provide important interactions with an enzyme. Due to their high charge at physiological pH, however, permeation into cells can be a challenge. Protecting phosphonates as prodrugs has shown promise in drug delivery. Thus, a variety of structures and cleavage/activation mechanisms exist, enabling release of the active compound. This review describes the structural diversity of these pro-moieties, relevant cleavage mechanisms and recent advances in the design of phosphonate prodrugs.