Sinonasal SMARCB1 (INI1) Deficient Carcinoma with Yolk Sac Tumor Differentiation: A Case Report and Treatment Options

Paratesticular/inguinal SMARCB1/INI1 deficient carcinomas with yolk sac tumour-like differentiation are aggressive somatic malignancies

AIMS

Extragonadal yolk sac tumour (YST) is rare, and may present a diagnostic challenge. YST differentiation was recently reported in some somatically derived tumours in the sinonasal location and in the female genital tract, together with a SMARCB1/INI1 loss. We report two paratesticular/inguinal tumours with striking morphological and immunohistochemical similarities with YST, further expanding the spectrum of extragonadal tumours with YST-like morphology and SMARCB1/INI1 loss.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients were 13- and 27-year-old males who presented with a 1-cm inguinal mass and a 4.6-cm spermatic cord mass, respectively. Both neoplasms showed histological and immunohistochemical features in keeping with YST. Immunohistochemically, the neoplastic cells were diffusely positive for AE1/AE3, spalt-like transcription factor 4 (SALL4) and glypican-3; alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) was positive in one of two tumours. S100, SMA, CD34 and brachyury were negative in both tumours. Pre-operative serum AFP levels were normal in both patients. Although the initial diagnostic consideration was extragonadal YST, the diagnostic work-up revealed complete loss of SMARCB1/INI1 on immunohistochemistry and absence of isochromosome 12p by fluorescence in-situ hybridisation. Both patients had an aggressive clinical course with rapid disease progression and widespread metastatic spread.

CONCLUSIONS

Somatically derived tumours with YST-like morphology at an extragonadal location present a potential diagnostic pitfall. This type of neoplasm has not been previously reported in males at this location. Therefore, SMARCB1/INI1 should be included in the immunohistochemistry work-up of any neoplasm that morphologically resembles YST at an extragonadal site, even in the setting of positive germ cell tumour markers, as the correct diagnosis has prognostic and therapeutic implications.

SMARCB1-deficient Sinonasal Carcinoma: Expanding the Pathologic Spectrum With a Series of 32 Cases

SMARCB1-deficient sinonasal carcinoma (SDSC) is a recently recognized rare malignancy. Despite growing awareness, SDSC remains susceptible to misdiagnosis owing to its rarity and overlapping features with diverse mimics. A retrospective review of the clinical and pathologic features of 32 SDSC including 4 SMARCB-1 deficient adenocarcinoma (SDAC) cases was performed. The patients were aged 19 to 76 years with a male predominance. Most tumors arose in the naso-ethmoid (75%), and advanced stage (93.6%), with frequent multi-sinus (90.5%) involvement. Histologically, tumors exhibited diverse morphologies, including basaloid (50%), rhabdoid (25%), and undifferentiated (12.5%) types. SDAC cases showed glandular differentiation with intraluminal and stromal mucin. Empty vacuoles (62.5%), pagetoid spread (31.3%), eosinophilic-granular bodies (18.8%), hyaline globules (15.2%), and florid glomeruloid neovascularization (15.6%) were additional findings. Yolk sac-like areas were encountered in 18.6%. Immunohistochemically, tumors were defined by a complete loss of SMARCB1 (100%); a variable reactivity for p40 (65.6%), synaptophysin (13.6%), glypican3 (6.1%), and CD34 (6.1%) was present. Notably, >90% of our patients had different initial diagnoses before referral. Lymph node metastasis, locoregional recurrence, and distant metastasis were seen in 23.3%, 24.1%, and 27.6% patients, respectively; 37.9% died of disease. In conclusion, SDSCs are rare and aggressive sinonasal malignancies that display a wide histologic spectrum including glandular differentiation. This study expands on the morphologic spectrum of SDSC by analyzing a large cohort of 32 cases, adding comprehensive clinical, histopathologic, and immunohistochemical data, and highlighting features to improve diagnostic accuracy. The emergence of targeted therapies, such as EZH2 inhibitors, further underscores the importance of accurate diagnosis.

SMARCB1-deficient poorly differentiated testicular carcinoma: a case report

In the present study, a 36-year-old male presented with left scrotal enlargement without an obvious cause, accompanied by a feeling of heaviness. Imaging examinations revealed a left testicular malignancy, the patient underwent left testicular mass removal,and the postoperative pathology results revealed a highly malignant germ cell tumor, with a tendency toward poorly differentiated embryonal carcinoma or seminoma. After surgery, the condition of the patient deteriorated rapidly, and distant tumor metastasis occurred. Lymph node puncture pathology results revealed poorly differentiated carcinoma consistent with SMARCB1/INI-1 deletion. Despite the use of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapy and targeted therapy, the patient died 11 months after surgery. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report of a SMARCB1/INI1-deficient Poorly differentiated testicular carcinoma, which is very similar to testicular spermatocytic carcinoma in clinical diagnosis and deserves differentiation for future clinical diagnoses.This report provides important insights into the diagnosis and treatment of SMARCB1/INI1-deficient testicular malignancy. SMARCB1 is a crucial tumor suppressor gene, and its deficiency is closely associated with the development of various malignant tumors. The identification of this case suggests that future research should further explore the molecular mechanisms of SMARCB1-deficient tumors, particularly their role in testicular malignancies. Additionally, the diagnostic process of this case highlights that SMARCB1/INI1-deficient tumors can be clinically very similar to spermatocytic carcinoma of the testis, which can easily lead to misdiagnosis. Therefore, future clinical practice should emphasize the detection of SMARCB1/INI1 expression status, especially in the context of highly aggressive and rapidly progressing testicular malignancies, where immunohistochemical testing for SMARCB1/INI1 should be considered to confirm the diagnosis. In terms of treatment, this case demonstrates the highly aggressive nature and resistance to conventional therapies of SMARCB1/INI1-deficient tumors. Despite the patient receiving multiple treatments, disease progression could not be halted. This underscores the need for the development of novel therapeutic strategies targeting SMARCB1/INI1-deficient tumors, such as combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies, or other emerging immunotherapeutic approaches. Moreover, the treatment course of this patient also reflects the importance of individualized treatment plans. Future research should further explore precision medicine strategies based on tumor genetic profiles to improve patient survival rates and quality of life.

SMARCB1 (INI-1) deficient sinonasal carcinoma of the right maxillary sinus - A rare entity

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

SMARCB1 (INI-1) is a vital tumour suppressor gene on chromosome 22q11.2, preventing tumour development in the SWI/SNF complex. Mutations cause SMARCB1-deficient tumours with distinct features. Loss of INI-1 expression is seen in malignancies, including sinonasal carcinoma and atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumours. Recently recognized as a separate entity, SMARCB1-deficient sinonasal carcinomas (SDSC) are rare, clinically aggressive, and mimic other malignancies, emphasizing their significant diagnosis due to poorer prognosis, particularly in the elderly.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 66-year-old male presented with a 4-month-old right cheek swelling, diagnosed initially as a sinonasal neoplastic mass. The biopsy revealed sinonasal mucosal fragments infiltrated by a tumour with plasmacytoid morphology. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) of the tumour cells was positive for p63 and pan-cytokeratin and showed INI-1 loss. Subsequent subtotal maxillectomy was performed, and the patient received adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy. At a thirteen-month follow-up, the patient achieved his daily activities with no signs of recurrence.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

The loss of protein expression in sinonasal cancer is predominantly attributed to the homozygous deletion of SMARCB1. SDSC, a profoundly invasive malignant carcinoma, tends to infiltrate sinuses and extend into the intracranial regions. The IHC findings of our case were in coherence with previous studies in SMARCB1. The prognosis is particularly unfavourable in males and advanced tumours.

CONCLUSION

The tumour's microscopic and immunohistochemical characteristics indicated the SDSC. Due to its aggressive nature and high mortality rates, dealing with a paranasal mass, one should be suspicious of this tumour.

SMARCB1-deficient sinonasal adenocarcinoma: a rare variant of SWI/SNF-deficient malignancy often misclassified as high-grade non-intestinal-type sinonasal adenocarcinoma or myoepithelial carcinoma

SMARCB1-deficient sinonasal adenocarcinoma is a rare variant of SWI/SNF-deficient malignancies with SMARCB1 loss and adenocarcinoma features. More than 200 high-grade epithelial sinonasal malignancies were retrieved. A total of 14 cases exhibited complete SMARCB1 (INI1) loss and glandular differentiation. SMARCA2 and SMARCA4 were normal, except for one case with a loss of SMARCA2. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) revealed an alteration in the SMARCB1 gene in 9/13 cases, while 2/13 were negative. Two tumors harbored SMARCB1 mutations in c.157C > T p.(Arg53Ter) and c.842G > A p.(Trp281Ter). One harbored ARID1B mutations in c.1469G > A p.(Trp490Ter) and MGA c.3724C > T p.(Arg1242Ter). Seven tumors had a SMARCB1 deletion. One carried an ESR1 mutation in c.644-2A > T, and another carried a POLE mutation in c.352_374del p.(Ser118GlyfsTer78). One case had a PAX3 mutation in c.44del p.(Gly15AlafsTer95). Histomorphology of SMARCB1-deficient adenocarcinoma was oncocytoid/rhabdoid and glandular, solid, or trabecular in 9/14 cases. Two had basaloid/blue cytoplasm and one showed focal signet ring cells. Yolk sac tumor-like differentiation with Schiller-Duval-like bodies was seen in 6/14 cases, with 2 cases showing exclusively reticular-microcystic yolk sac pattern. Follow-up of a maximum of 26 months (median 10 months) was available for 8/14 patients. Distant metastasis to the lung, liver, mediastinum, bone, and/or retroperitoneum was seen in 4/8 cases. Locoregional failure was seen in 75% of patients, with 6/8 local recurrences and 3 cervical lymph node metastases. At the last follow-up, 5 of 8 (62%) patients had died of their disease 2 to 20 months after diagnosis (median 8.2 months), and 3 were alive with the disease. The original diagnosis was usually high-grade non-intestinal-type adenocarcinoma or high-grade myoepithelial carcinoma. A correct diagnosis of these aggressive tumors could lead to improved targeted therapies with potentially better overall disease-specific survival.

Underreporting of SMARCB1 alteration by clinical sequencing: Integrative patho-genomic analysis captured SMARCB1/INI-1 deficiency in a vulvar yolk sac tumor

•SMARCB1/INI1-deficient gynecologic tumors are rare and clinically aggressive. A subset shows primitive yolk sac tumor features.•Due to technical limitation of next generation sequencing (NGS) and interlaboratory variability in sequencing methodologies and analytical pipelines, SMARCB1 deficiency caused by somatic copy number variations (SCNV) may be underreported by NGS.•To improve identification of SMARCB1/INI1-deficient neoplasm, we propose the following strategy: First, careful pathology slide review and detection of rhabdoid cells should raise the possibility of SMARCB1/INI1 deficiency. Second, INI1 IHC is a useful complementary test to exclude clinical suspicion of SMARCB1 deficiency in the context of negative molecular reporting. Third, knowledge of potential underreporting of SMARCB1 mutation would avoid underdiagnosis.

[Sinonasal neoplasms: Update from the WHO 2022]

The pathology of poorly differentiated sinonasal malignancies has undergone a dynamic evolution during the last decade, resulting in a refined, mostly genetically or etiologically oriented classification of neoplasms in the historical spectrum of sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma (NUT carcinoma, SWI-/SNF-deficient carcinomas, and others). Moreover, some new entities have been established, while others could be further delineated and better characterized. A highlight of the new classification is the inclusion of SWI/SNF (SMARCB1 or SMARCA4)-deficient carcinomas into a separate category. In addition, carcinomas with DEK::AFF2 fusions have been included as a provisional entity in the spectrum of nonkeratinizing squamous cell carcinoma. This review addresses the major changes in the classification of sinonasal tract neoplasms in the new WHO classification.

SWI/SNF-deficient Sinonasal Carcinomas

The classification of poorly differentiated sinonasal carcinomas and their nonepithelial mimics has experienced tremendous developments during the last 2 decades. These recent developments paved the way for an increasingly adopted approach to a molecular-based or etiology-based refined classification of the many carcinoma variants that have been historically lumped into the sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma category. Among these new achievements, recognition of carcinoma subtypes driven by defects in the Switch/Sucrose nonfermentable (SWI/SNF) chromatin remodeling complex represents a major highlight. This resulted in a new definition of 4 sinonasal entities driven solely or predominantly by Switch/Sucrose nonfermentable complex deficiency: (1) SMARCB1(INI1)-deficient sinonasal carcinoma (lacking gland formation and frequently displaying a non-descript basaloid, and less frequently eosinophilic/oncocytoid morphology, but no features of other definable subtypes), (2) SMARCB1-deficient sinonasal adenocarcinoma (with unequivocal glands or yolk sac-like pattern), (3) SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated (sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma-like) carcinoma (lacking glandular or squamous immunophenotypes), and (4) SMARCA4-deficient subset (~80%) of sinonasal teratocarcinosarcoma. Fortunately, diagnostic loss of all these proteins can be detected by routine immunohistochemistry, so that genetic testing is not mandatory in routine practice. This review summarizes the main demographic, clinicopathological, and molecular features of these new entities.

Clinicopathological features and prognostic outcomes of molecularly defined entities in the new edition of the WHO classification of sinonasal carcinoma

Introduction

We investigated the clinicopathological features and prognoses of the new molecularly defined entities in latest edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of sinonasal carcinoma (SNC).

Methods

Integrated data were combined into an individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis.

Results

We included 61 studies with 278 SNCs including 25 IDH2-mutant, 41 NUT carcinoma, 187 SWI/SNF loss, and 25 triple negative SNCs (without IDH2 mutation, NUTM1 rearrangement, and SWI/SNF inactivation) for analyses. Compared to other molecular groups, NUT carcinoma was associated with a younger age at presentation and an inferior disease-specific survival. Among SNCs with SWI/SNF inactivation, SMARCB1-deficient tumors presented later in life and were associated with a higher rate of radiotherapy administration. SMARCA4-deficiency was mostly found in teratocarcinosarcoma while SMARCB1-deficient tumors were associated with undifferentiated carcinoma and non-keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma.

Conclusion

Our study facilitates our current understanding of this developing molecular-defined spectrum of tumors and their prognoses.

A Novel Successful Case of Nasal and Sinus Yolk Sac Tumor With SMARCB1 (INI-1) Deficiency: A Case Report

Yolk sac tumors (YSTs) of the head and neck region account for only 1% of all malignant tumors of germ cell origin. YSTs with SMARCB1 deficiency are very aggressive. Only one nasal and sinus YST with SMARCB1-deficient carcinoma (SDC) was reported with follow-up information but the patient died 20 months after diagnosis. We report a successful case treated by surgery combined with radiotherapy and limited cycles of chemotherapy, achieving a good prognosis. A 55-year-old male was seen with a three-month history of right nasal congestion, right nasal hemorrhage and hyposmia. The tumor widely invaded multiple regions such as the sphenoid, ethmoid sinus, orbital medial wall, choana, right maxillary sinus, and right pterygopalatine fossa. After endoscopic surgery, he was diagnosed as SDC with pure YST differentiation. The patient underwent endoscopic surgery, combined with radiotherapy as well as three cycles of chemotherapy with etoposide and cisplatin (EP regimen) and finally achieved over one year of disease-free survival. YST with SDC in the nasal and sinus regions is very rare and hard to treat. We highlight the value of combined treatment options including surgery, radiotherapy and limited cycles of chemotherapy to achieve a good prognosis.

SMARCB1 (INI1)-Deficient Sinonasal Carcinoma with Yolk Sac differentiation Showing Co-loss of SMARCA4 Immunostaining - A Case Report and Literature Review

SMARCB1 (INI1)-deficient carcinoma of the sinonasal tract is a rare and distinct entity characterized by the loss of INI1 immunostain expression. These tumors are morphologically diverse, with isolated cases of yolk sac differentiation reported. We report the first case of SMARCB1-deficient sinonasal carcinoma that demonstrated co-loss of SMARCA4 immunostain, and reduced SMARCA2 and ARID1A staining, with the entire tumor showing histological and immunohistochemical evidence of yolk sac differentiation. The clinical, histological, immunohistochemical and molecular features were discussed and compared against SMARCB1-deficient sinonasal carcinomas with yolk sac differentiation and SMARCA4-deficeint sinonasal carcinomas reported in the literature. With a highly aggressive clinical course leading to mortality two months after presentation, the behavior of this tumor appears to be more comparable to that of SMARCA4-deficient sinonasal carcinomas. A comprehensive immunopanel including SMARCB1, SMARCA4, SMARCA2 and ARID1A may be advisable for assessment and prognostication of SWI/SNF-deficient tumors.

SMARCB1 (INI-1)-Deficient Sinonasal Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis of Treatment Outcomes

(1) Background: SMARCB1 (INI-1)-deficient sinonasal carcinoma is a rare sinonasal malignancy; since its discovery and description in 2014, less than 200 cases have been identified. It is almost impossible to perform randomized-controlled trials on novel therapy to improve treatment outcomes in view of its rarity. We performed a systematic review of all the published case reports/series and included our patients for survival analysis. (2) Methods: In this systematic review, we searched from PubMed-MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Google Scholar for individual patient data to identify and retrieve all reported SMARCB1-deficient sinonasal carcinoma. Clarification on treatment details and the most updated survival outcomes from all authors of the published case reports/series were attempted. Survival analysis for overall survival (OS) and identification of OS prognostic factors were performed. This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022306671). (3) Results: A total of 67 publications were identified from the systematic review and literature search. After excluding other ineligible and duplicated publications, 192 patients reported were considered appropriate for further review. After excluding duplicates and patients with incomplete pretreatment details and survival outcomes, 120 patients were identified to have a complete set of data including baseline demographics, treatment details, and survival outcomes. Together with 8 patients treated in our institution, 128 patients were included into survival analysis. After a median follow up of 17.5 months (range 0.3-149.0), 50 (46.3%) patients died. The 1-year, 2-year and 3-year OS rates were 84.3% (95% CI % 77.6-91.0), 62.9% (95% CI 53.1-72.7), and 51.8% (95% CI 40.8-62.8), respectively, and the median OS was 39.0 months (95% CI 28.5-49.5). Males (p = 0.029) and T4b disease (p = 0.013) were significant OS prognostic factors in univariable analysis, while only T4b disease (p = 0.017) remained significant in multivariable analysis. (4) Conclusions: SMARCB1-deficient sinonasal carcinoma is an extremely aggressive sinonasal malignancy with a dismal prognosis. Early diagnosis and a multimodality treatment strategy are essential for a better treatment and survival outcome.

Proceedings of the North American Society of Head and Neck Pathology, Los Angeles, CA, March 20, 2022: SWI/SNF-deficient Sinonasal Neoplasms: An Overview

The pathology of poorly differentiated sinonasal malignancies has been the subject of extensive studies during the last decade, which resulted into significant developments in the definitions and histo-/pathogenetic classification of several entities included in the historical spectrum of "sinonasal undifferentiated carcinomas (SNUC)" and poorly differentiated unclassified carcinomas. In particular, genetic defects leading to inactivation of different protein subunits in the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex have continuously emerged as the major (frequently the only) genetic player driving different types of sinonasal carcinomas. The latter display distinctive demographic, phenotypic and genotypic characteristics. To date, four different SWI/SNF-driven sinonasal tumor types have been recognized: SMARCB1(INI1)-deficient carcinoma (showing frequently non-descript basaloid, and less frequently eosinophilic, oncocytoid or rhabdoid undifferentiated morphology), SMARCB1-deficient adenocarcinomas (showing variable gland formation or yolk sac-like morphology), SMARCA4-deficient carcinoma (lacking any differentiation markers and variably overlapping with large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and SNUC), and lastly, SMARCA4-deficient sinonasal teratocarcinosarcoma. These different tumor types display highly variable immunophenotypes with SMARCB1-deficient carcinomas showing variable squamous immunophenotype, while their SMARCA4-related counterparts lack such features altogether. While sharing same genetic defect, convincing evidence is still lacking that SMARCA4-deficient carcinoma and SMARCA4-deficient teratocracinosarcoma might belong to the spectrum of same entity. Available molecular studies revealed no additional drivers in these entities, confirming the central role of SWI/SNF deficiency as the sole driver genetic event in these aggressive malignancies. Notably, all studied cases lacked oncogenic IDH2 mutations characteristic of genuine SNUC. Identification and precise classification of these entities and separating them from SNUC, NUT carcinoma and other poorly differentiated neoplasms of epithelial melanocytic, hematolymphoid or mesenchymal origin is mandatory for appropriate prognostication and tailored therapies. Moreover, drugs targeting the SWI/SNF vulnerabilities are emerging in clinical trials.