A preliminary report of breast cancer screening by positron emission mammography

A position-adaptive noise-reduction method using a deep denoising filter bank for dedicated breast positron emission tomography images

Dedicated breast positron emission tomography (db-PET) is more sensitive than whole-body positron emission tomography and is thus expected to detect early stage breast cancer and determine treatment efficacy. However, it is challenging to decrease the sensitivity of the chest wall side at the edge of the detector, resulting in a relative increase in noise and a decrease in detectability. Longer acquisition times and injection of larger amounts of tracer improve image quality but increase the burden on the patient. Therefore, this study aimed to improve image quality via reconstruction with shorter acquisition time data using deep learning, which has recently been widely used as a noise reduction technique. In our proposed method, a multi-adaptive denoising filter bank structure was introduced by training the training data separately for each detector area because the noise characteristics of db-PET images vary at different locations. Input and ideal images were reconstructed based on 1- and 7-min collection data, respectively, using list mode data. The deep learning model used residual learning with an encoder-decoder structure. The image quality of the proposed method was superior to that of existing noise reduction filters such as Gaussian filters and nonlocal mean filters. Furthermore, there was no significant difference between the maximum standardized uptake values before and after filtering using the proposed method. Taken together, the proposed method is useful as a noise reduction filter for db-PET images, as it can reduce the patient burden, scan time, and radiotracer amount in db-PET examinations.

Clinical Applications of Dedicated Breast Positron Emission Tomography

Breast-specific positron imaging systems provide higher sensitivity than whole-body PET for breast cancer detection. The clinical applications for breast-specific positron imaging are similar to breast MRI including preoperative local staging and neoadjuvant therapy response assessment. Breast-specific positron imaging may be an alternative for patients who cannot undergo breast MRI. Further research is needed in expanding the field-of-view for posterior breast lesions, increasing biopsy capability, and reducing radiation dose. Efforts are also necessary for developing appropriate use criteria, increasing availability, and advancing insurance coverage.

Molecular Breast Imaging and Positron Emission Mammography

There is growing interest in application of functional imaging modalities for adjunct breast imaging due to their unique ability to evaluate molecular/pathophysiologic changes, not visible by standard anatomic breast imaging. This has led to increased use of nuclear medicine dedicated breast-specific single photon and coincidence imaging systems for multiple indications, such as supplemental screening, staging of newly diagnosed breast cancer, evaluation of response to neoadjuvant treatment, diagnosis of local disease recurrence in the breast, and problem solving. Studies show that these systems maybe especially useful for specific subsets of patients, not well served by available anatomic breast imaging modalities.

Performance of dedicated breast PET in breast cancer screening: comparison with digital mammography plus digital breast tomosynthesis and ultrasound

OBJECTIVE

To compare the diagnostic performance of dedicated breast positron emission tomography (dbPET) in breast cancer screening with digital mammography plus digital breast tomosynthesis (DM-DBT) and breast ultrasound (US).

METHODS

Women who participated in opportunistic whole-body PET/computed tomography cancer screening programs with breast examinations using dbPET, DM-DBT, and US between 2016-2020, whose results were determined pathologically or by follow-up for at least 1 year, were included. DbPET, DM-DBT, and US assessments were classified into four diagnostic categories: A (no abnormality), B (mild abnormality), C (need for follow-up), and D (recommend further examination). Category D was defined as screening positive. Each modality's recall rate, sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) were calculated per examination to evaluate their diagnostic performance for breast cancer.

RESULTS

Out of 2156 screenings, 18 breast cancer cases were diagnosed during the follow-up period (10 invasive cancers and eight ductal carcinomas in situ [DCIS]). The recall rates for dbPET, DM-DBT, and US were 17.8%, 19.2%, and 9.4%, respectively. The recall rate of dbPET was highest in the first year and subsequently decreased to 11.4%. dbPET, DM-DBT, and US had sensitivities of 72.2%, 88.9%, and 83.3%; specificities of 82.6%, 81.4%, and 91.2%; and PPVs of 3.4%, 3.9%, and 7.4%, respectively. The sensitivities of dbPET, DM-DBT, and US for invasive cancers were 90%, 100%, and 90%, respectively. There were no significant differences between the modalities. One case of dbPET-false-negative invasive cancer was identified in retrospect. DbPET had 50% sensitivity for DCIS, while that of both DM-DBT and US was 75%. Furthermore, the specificity of dbPET in the first year was the lowest among all periods, and modalities increased over the years to 88.7%. The specificity of dbPET was significantly higher than that of DM-DBT (p < 0.01) in the last 3 years.

CONCLUSIONS

DbPET had a compatible sensitivity to DM-DBT and breast US for invasive breast cancer. The specificity of dbPET was improved and became higher than that of DM-DBT. DbPET may be a feasible screening modality.

Dedicated phantom tools using traceable 68Ge/68Ga point-like sources for dedicated-breast PET and positron emission mammography scanners

Since the early 2000s, many types of positron emission tomography (PET) scanners dedicated to breast imaging for the diagnosis of breast cancer have been introduced. However, conventional performance evaluation methods developed for whole-body PET scanners cannot be used for such devices. In this study, we developed phantom tools for evaluating the quantitative accuracy of positron emission mammography (PEM) and dedicated-breast PET (dbPET) scanners using novel traceable point-like ⁶⁸Ge/⁶⁸ Ga sources. The PEM phantom consisted of an acrylic cube (100 × 100 × 40 mm) and three point-like sources. The dbPET phantom comprised an acrylic cylinder (ø100 × 100 mm) and five point-like sources. These phantoms were used for evaluating the fundamental responses of clinical PEM and dbPET scanners to point-like inputs in a medium. The results showed that reasonable recovery values were obtained based on region-of-interest analyses of the reconstructed images. The developed phantoms using traceable ⁶⁸Ge/⁶⁸ Ga point-like sources were useful for evaluating the physical characteristics of PEM and dbPET scanners. Thus, they offer a practical, reliable, and universal measurement scheme for evaluating various types of PET scanners using common sets of sealed sources.

Breast-Specific Gamma Imaging: An Added Value in the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer, a Systematic Review

Simple Summary

Breast-specific gamma imaging represents an emergent instrument for breast cancer detection. We selected on Medline articles published from 1995 to 2022 that compare various imaging modalities with breast-specific gamma imaging. The aim of this paper was to assess if this imaging method is a more valuable choice in detecting breast malignant lesions compared to morphological counterparts such mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging in terms of specificity, sensibility and positive and negative predictive value. At the cost of a major radiology burden, breast-specific gamma imaging is more specific, with a sensibility comparable to magnetic resonance imaging and higher than ultrasonography and mammography.

Abstract

Purpose: Breast cancer is the most common solid tumor and the second highest cause of death in the United States. Detection and diagnosis of breast tumors includes various imaging modalities, such as mammography (MMG), ultrasound (US), and contrast-enhancement MRI. Breast-specific gamma imaging (BSGI) is an emerging tool, whereas morphological imaging has the disadvantage of a higher absorbed dose. Our aim was to assess if this imaging method is a more valuable choice in detecting breast malignant lesions compared to morphological counterparts. Methods: research on Medline from 1995 to June 2022 was conducted. Studies that compared at least one anatomical imaging modality with BSGI were screened and assessed through QUADAS2 for risk of bias and applicability concerns assessment. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV) were reported. Results: A total of 15 studies compared BSGI with MMG, US, and MRI. BSGI sensitivity was similar to MRI, but specificity was higher. Specificity was always higher than MMG and US. BSGI had higher PPV and NPV. When used for the evaluation of a suspected breast lesion, the overall sensitivity was better than the examined overall sensitivity when BSGI was excluded. Risk of bias and applicability concerns domain showed mainly low risk of bias. Conclusion: BSGI is a valuable imaging modality with similar sensitivity to MRI but higher specificity, although at the cost of higher radiation burden.

Diabetes, Obesity, and Inflammation: Impact on Clinical and Radiographic Features of Breast Cancer

Obesity, diabetes, and inflammation increase the risk of breast cancer, the most common malignancy in women. One of the mainstays of breast cancer treatment and improving outcomes is early detection through imaging-based screening. There may be a role for individualized imaging strategies for patients with certain co-morbidities. Herein, we review the literature regarding the accuracy of conventional imaging modalities in obese and diabetic women, the potential role of anti-inflammatory agents to improve detection, and the novel molecular imaging techniques that may have a role for breast cancer screening in these patients. We demonstrate that with conventional imaging modalities, increased sensitivity often comes with a loss of specificity, resulting in unnecessary biopsies and overtreatment. Obese women have body size limitations that impair image quality, and diabetes increases the risk for dense breast tis-sue. Increased density is known to obscure the diagnosis of cancer on routine screening mammography. Novel molecu-lar imaging agents with targets such as estrogen receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), pyrimi-dine analogues, and ligand-targeted receptor probes, among others, have potential to reduce false positive results. They can also improve detection rates with increased resolution and inform therapeutic decision making. These emerg-ing imaging techniques promise to improve breast cancer diagnosis in obese patients with diabetes who have dense breasts, but more work is needed to validate their clinical application.

Clinical practice guidelines for high-resolution breast PET, 2019 edition

Breast positron emission tomography (PET) has had insurance coverage when performed with conventional whole-body PET in Japan since 2013. Together with whole-body PET, accurate examination of breast cancer and diagnosis of metastatic disease are possible, and are expected to contribute significantly to its treatment planning. To facilitate a safer, smoother, and more appropriate examination, the Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine published the first edition of practice guidelines for high-resolution breast PET in 2013. Subsequently, new types of breast PET have been developed and their clinical usefulness clarified. Therefore, the guidelines for breast PET were revised in 2019. This article updates readers as to what is new in the second edition. This edition supports two different types of breast PET depending on the placement of the detector: the opposite-type (positron emission mammography; PEM) and the ring-shaped type (dedicated breast PET; dbPET), providing an overview of these scanners and appropriate imaging methods, their clinical applications, and future prospects. The name "dedicated breast PET" from the first edition is widely used to refer to ring-shaped type breast PET. In this edition, "breast PET" has been defined as a term that refers to both opposite- and ring-shaped devices. Up-to-date breast PET practice guidelines would help provide useful information for evidence-based breast imaging.

Evaluation of image quality at the detector's edge of dedicated breast positron emission tomography

BACKGROUND

Using phantoms and clinical studies in prone hanging breast imaging, we assessed the image quality of a commercially available dedicated breast PET (dbPET) at the detector's edge, where mammary glands near the chest wall are located. These are compared to supine PET/CT breast images of the same clinical subjects.

METHODS

A breast phantom with four spheres (16-, 10-, 7.5-, and 5-mm diameter) was filled with ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose solution (sphere-to-background activity concentration ratio, 8:1). The spheres occupied five different positions from the top edge to the centre of the detector and were scanned for 5 min in each position. Reconstructed images were visually evaluated, and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), contrast recovery coefficient (CRC) for all spheres, and coefficient of variation of the background (CV_B) were calculated. Subsequently, clinical images obtained with standard supine PET/CT and prone dbPET were retrospectively analysed. Tumour-to-background ratios (TBRs) between breast cancer near the chest wall (close to the detector's edge; peripheral group) and at other locations (non-peripheral group) were compared. The TBR of each lesion was compared between dbPET and PET/CT.

RESULTS

Closer to the detector's edge, the CNR and CRC of all spheres decreased while the CV_B increased in the phantom study. The disadvantages of this placement were visually confirmed. Regarding clinical images, TBR of dbPET was significantly higher than that of PET/CT in both the peripheral (12.38 ± 6.41 vs 6.73 ± 3.5, p = 0.0006) and non-peripheral (12.44 ± 5.94 vs 7.71 ± 7.1, p = 0.0183) groups. There was no significant difference in TBR of dbPET between the peripheral and non-peripheral groups.

CONCLUSION

The phantom study revealed poorer image quality at < 2-cm distance from the detector's edge than at other more central parts. In clinical studies, however, the visibility of breast lesions with dbPET was the same regardless of the lesion position, and it was higher than that in PET/CT. dbPET has a great potential for detecting breast lesions near the chest wall if they are at least 2 cm from the edge of the FOV, even in young women with small breasts.

Positron Emission Mammography (PEM) in the diagnosis of breast cancer: A systematic review and economic evaluation

Background: Positron Emission Mammography (PEM) is an imaging technique which is increasing focuses on imaging the chest instead of imaging the whole body. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the clinical efficacy and coste-ffectiveness of PEM technology, as compared with PET, as a diagnostic method used for breast cancer patients.

Methods: The present study was a Health Technology Assessment (HTA), which was conducted via a systematic review of clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the methods based on domestic evidence. To evaluate the efficacy of the PEM diagnostic method, as compared with PET, we used efficacy indices, including Sensitivity, Specificity, Accuracy, PPV, and NPV. The required data were collected through a meta-analysis of studies published in electronic databases from 1990 to 2016. In addition, direct costs in both methods were estimated and finally, a cost-effectiveness analysis was performed using the results of the study. Also, a one-way sensitivity analysis was performed to examine the effects of parameters’ uncertainty in the model. In this study, we used STATA software to integrate the results of studies with similar parameters.

Results: A total of 722 cases (N) were obtained from the five final studies. The results of the meta-analysis performed on the collected data showed that the two methods were identical in terms of the Specificity and PPV parameters. However, as to Sensitivity, NPV, and Accuracy parameters, the PEM method was superior to the PET for diagnosis of primary breast cancer. The total cost of using PEM and PET was $1737385.7 and $1940903.5, respectively, and the cost of a one-time scan (cost per unit) using PEM and PET devices was $86.82 and $157.63, respectively. As compared with the PET method, the use of the PEM diagnostic method for diagnosis of breast cancer was cost-effective in terms of all the five studied parameters (it was definitely cost-effective for four parameters and was also considered as cost-effective for another index, since ICER was below the threshold).

Conclusion: The results showed that the use of PEM technology for the diagnosis of primary breast cancer is more cost-effective than PET technology; thus, due to the wide range of PET technology in different fields, it is recommended that this method should be used in other areas of priority.

Characterisation of MRI Indeterminate Breast Lesions Using Dedicated Breast PET and Prone FDG PET-CT in Patients with Breast Cancer—A Proof-of-Concept Study

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with breast cancer to assess extent of disease or multifocal disease can demonstrate indeterminate lesions requiring second-look ultrasound and ultrasound or MRI-guided biopsies. Prone positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) is a dedicated acquisition performed with a breast-supporting device on a standard PET-CT scanner. The MAMmography with Molecular Imaging (MAMMI, Oncovision, Valencia, Spain) PET system (PET-MAMMI) is a true tomographic ring scanner for the breast. We investigated if PET-MAMMI and prone PET-CT were able to characterise these MRI- indeterminate lesions further. A total of 10 patients with breast cancer and indeterminate lesions on breast MRI were included. Patients underwent prone PET-MAMMI and prone PET-CT after injection of FDG subsequently on the same day. Patients then resumed their normal pathway, with the clinicians blinded to the results of the PET-MAMMI and prone PET-CT. Of the MRI-indeterminate lesions, eight were histopathologically proven to be malignant and two were benign. PET-MAMMI and prone PET-CT only were able to demonstrate increased FDG uptake in 1/8 and 0/8 of the MRI-indeterminate malignant lesions, respectively. Of the MRI-indeterminate benign lesions, both PET-MAMMI and prone PET-CT demonstrated avidity in 1/2 of these lesions. Our findings do not support the use of PET-MAMMI to characterise indeterminate breast MRI lesions requiring a second look ultrasound.

Novel Approaches to Screening for Breast Cancer

Screening for breast cancer reduces breast cancer-related mortality and earlier detection facilitates less aggressive treatment. Unfortunately, current screening modalities are imperfect, suffering from limited sensitivity and high false-positive rates. Novel techniques in the field of breast imaging may soon play a role in breast cancer screening: digital breast tomosynthesis, contrast material-enhanced spectral mammography, US (automated three-dimensional breast US, transmission tomography, elastography, optoacoustic imaging), MRI (abbreviated and ultrafast, diffusion-weighted imaging), and molecular breast imaging. Artificial intelligence and radiomics have the potential to further improve screening strategies. Furthermore, nonimaging-based screening tests such as liquid biopsy and breathing tests may transform the screening landscape. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

A review of various modalities in breast imaging: technical aspects and clinical outcomes

Background

Nowadays, breast cancer is the second cause of death after cardiovascular diseases. In general, about one out of eight women (about 12%) suffer from this disease during their life in the USA and European countries. If breast cancer is detected at an early stage, its survival rate will be very high. Several methods have been introduced to diagnose breast cancer with their clinical advantages and disadvantages.

Main text

In this review, various methods of breast imaging have been introduced. Furthermore, the sensitivity and specificity of each of these methods have been investigated. For each of the imaging methods, articles that were relevant to the past 10 years were selected through electronic search engines, and then the most relevant papers were selected. Finally, about 40 articles were studied and their results were categorized and presented in the form of a report as follows. Various breast cancer imaging techniques were extracted as follows: mammography, contrast-enhanced mammography, digital tomosynthesis, sonography, sonoelastography, magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic elastography, diffusion-weighted imaging, magnetic spectroscopy, nuclear medicine, optical imaging, and microwave imaging.

Conclusion

The choice of these methods depends on the patient’s state and stage, the age of the individual and the density of the breast tissue. Hybrid imaging techniques appear to be an acceptable way to improve detection of breast cancer. This review article can be useful in choosing the right method for imaging in people suspected of breast cancer.

Reduction of the fluorine-18-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose dose for clinically dedicated breast positron emission tomography

PURPOSE

To determine the clinically acceptable level of reduction in the injected fluorine-18 (¹⁸F)-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) dose in dedicated breast positron emission tomography (dbPET).

METHODS

A breast phantom with four spheres exhibiting various diameters (5, 7.5, 10, and 16 mm), a background ¹⁸F-FDG radioactivity of 2.28 kBq/mL, and a sphere-to-background radioactivity ratio of 8:1 was used. True dose-reduced dbPET images were obtained by data acquisition for 20 min in list mode at multiple time points over 7 h of radioactive decay. Simulated dose-reduced images were generated by reconstruction with a portion of the list mode acquisition data. True and simulated dose-reduced images were visually and quantitatively compared. On the basis of the phantom study, dbPET images for 32 breasts of 28 women with abnormal uptake were generated after simulated reduction of the injected ¹⁸F-FDG doses; these images were compared with those acquired using current clinical doses.

RESULTS

There were no qualitative differences between true and simulated dose-reduced phantom images. The phantom study revealed that the minimal required dose was 12.5% for the detection of 5-mm spheres and 25% for precise semi-quantification of FDG in the spheres. The 7-min reconstruction with a 100% dose was defined as the reference for the clinical study. The image quality and lesion conspicuity were clinically acceptable for the 25% dose images. Lesion detectability on the 12.5% dose images was maintained despite image quality degradation.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, 25% of the standard ¹⁸F-FDG dose for dbPET can provide a clinically acceptable image quality, while 12.5% of the standard dose results in acceptable quality in terms of lesion detection when lesions are located at a sufficient distance from the edge of the dbPET detector.

Comparison of dedicated breast positron emission tomography and whole-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography images: a common phantom study

OBJECTIVE

High-resolution dedicated breast positron emission tomography (dbPET) can visualize breast cancer more clearly than whole-body PET/computed tomography (CT). In Japan, the combined use of dbPET and whole-body PET/CT is necessary in indications for health insurance. Although several clinical studies have compared both devices, a physical evaluation by the phantom test has not been reported. The aim of this study was to compare the ability of ring-shaped dbPET and whole-body PET/CT using a common phantom with reference to the Japanese guideline for the oncology ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET/CT data acquisition protocol.

METHODS

A cylindrical breast phantom with four spheres of different diameters (16, 10, 7.5, and 5 mm) filled an FDG solution at sphere-to-background radioactivity ratios (SBRs) of 2:1, 4:1, and 8:1 was prepared. Images were then acquired by whole-body PET/CT and subsequently by dbPET. The reconstructed images were visually evaluated and the coefficient of variation and uniformity of the background (CV_background and SD_ΔSUVmean), percentages of contrast and background variability (%Q_H,5mm and %N_5mm), and their ratio (%Q_H,5mm/N_5mm), and relative recovery coefficient were compared with the standards defined in the protocol for whole-body PET/CT.

RESULTS

The parameters were calculated at an SBR of 8:1, which was the only SBR in which a 5-mm sphere was visible on both devices. The standards were defined as < 10% for CV_background, ≤ 0.025 for SD_ΔSUVmean, < 5.6% for %N_5mm, > 2.8 for %Q_H,5mm/N_5mm, and > 0.38 for the relative recovery coefficient of the smallest sphere (10 mm in diameter) in the protocol for whole-body PET/CT (the %Q_H,5mm was not determined for that protocol); the respective values were 6.14%, 0.024, 4.55%, 3.66, and 0.33 for dbPET and 2.21%, 0.021, 3.11%, 1.72, and 0.18 for PET/CT. The Q_H,5mm was 16.67% for dbPET and 5.34% for PET/CT. The human images also showed higher lesion-to-background contrast on dbPET than on PET/CT despite the noisier background observed with dbPET.

CONCLUSION

The common phantom study showed that the background was noisier and that the contrast was much higher in the dbPET image than in the PET/CT image. The acquisition protocol and standards for dbPET will need to be different from those used for whole-body PET/CT.

Molecular Imaging in Breast Cancer

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer among females with more than 2 million new cases diagnosed worldwide in 2018. Although the prognosis in the majority of cases in the early stages combined with appropriate treatment is positive, there are still about 30% of patients who will develop locoregional diseases and distant metastases. Molecular imaging is very important in the diagnosis, staging, follow-up, and radiotherapy planning. Additionally, it is useful in characterizing lesions, prognosis, and therapy response in BC patients. Nuclear medicine imaging modalities (SPECT and PET) are of indispensable importance in diagnosis (positron emission mammography), staging (sentinel lymph node detection), and follow-up with¹⁸F-FDG and tumor characterization. Among many available PET tracers, the most commonly used are ¹⁸F-FLT, ¹⁸F-FES, ¹⁸F-FDHT, ⁶⁴Cu DOTA trastuzumab (bevacizumab), ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA, ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 (gastrin-releasing peptide receptor), ¹⁸F-fluorooctreotide (SSTR), and ⁶⁸Ga-TRAP (RGD)-3αvβ3-integrin. Molecular imaging helps in evaluation of tumor heterogeneity, allowing a shift from one-size-fits-all-approach to era of personalized medicine and precision oncology.

Dedicated Breast Gamma Camera Imaging and Breast PET: Current Status and Future Directions

Recent advances in nuclear medicine instrumentation have led to the emergence of improved molecular imaging techniques to image breast cancer: dedicated gamma cameras using γ-emitting ^99mTc-sestamibi and breast-specific PET cameras using ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose. This article focuses on the current role of such approaches in the clinical setting including diagnosis, assessing local extent of disease, monitoring response to therapy, and, for gamma camera imaging, possible supplemental screening in women with dense breasts. Barriers to clinical adoption and technologies and radiotracers under development are also discussed.

Use of Breast-Specific PET Scanners and Comparison with MR Imaging

The goals of this article are to discuss the role of breast-specific PET imaging of women with breast cancer, compare the clinical performance of positron emission mammography (PEM) and MR imaging for current indications, and provide recommendations for when women should undergo PEM instead of breast MR imaging.

Feasibility of 18F-FDG Dose Reductions in Breast Cancer PET/MRI

The goal of this study was to determine the level of clinically acceptable ¹⁸F-FDG dose reduction in time-of-flight PET/MRI in patients with breast cancer. Methods: Twenty-six consecutive women with histologically proven breast cancer were analyzed (median age, 51 y; range, 34-83 y). Simulated dose-reduced PET images were generated by unlisting the list-mode data on PET/MRI. The acquired 20-min PET frame was reconstructed in 5 ways: a reconstruction of the first 2 min with 3 iterations and 28 subsets for reference, and reconstructions simulating 100%, 20%, 10%, and 5% of the original dose. General image quality and artifacts, image sharpness, image noise, and lesion detectability were analyzed using a 4-point scale. Qualitative parameters were compared using the nonparametric Friedman test for multiple samples and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for paired samples. Different groups of independent samples were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Results: Overall, 355 lesions (71 lesions with 5 different reconstructions each) were evaluated. The 20-min reconstruction with 100% injected dose showed the best results in all categories. For general image quality and artifacts, image sharpness, and noise, the reconstructions with a simulated dose of 20% and 10% were significantly better than the 2-min reconstructions (P ≤ 0.001). Furthermore, 20%, 10%, and 5% reconstructions did not yield results different from those of the 2-min reconstruction for detectability of the primary lesion. For 10% of the injected dose, a calculated mean dose of 22.6 ± 5.5 MBq (range, 17.9-36.9 MBq) would have been applied, resulting in an estimated whole-body radiation burden of 0.5 ± 0.1 mSv (range, 0.4-0.7 mSv). Conclusion: Ten percent of the standard dose of ¹⁸F-FDG (reduction of ≤90%) results in clinically acceptable PET image quality in time-of-flight PET/MRI. The calculated radiation exposure would be comparable to the effective dose of a single digital mammogram. A reduction of radiation burden to this level might justify partial-body examinations with PET/MRI for dedicated indications.

Newly-Developed Positron Emission Mammography (PEM) Device for the Detection of Small Breast Cancer

Positron emission mammography (PEM) has higher detection sensitivity for breast cancer compared with whole-body positron emission tomography (PET) due to higher spatial resolution. We have developed a new PEM device with high resolution over a wide field of view. This PEM device comprises novel scintillation crystals, praseodymium-doped lutetium aluminum garnet (Pr:LuAG). In the present study, the clinical use of the newly developed PEM for the detection of small breast cancer was compared with that of the conventional PET-computed tomography (PET/CT). Eighty-two patients with breast cancer less than 20 mm (UICC T1) participated in this study, including 23 patients with T1a or T1b breast cancer (less than 10 mm). Histologically-proved lesions were examined by PET/CT and PEM on the same day after injection of [¹⁸F]fluoro-2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose ([¹⁸F]FDG), a marker of glycolytic activity. The newly developed PEM showed better sensitivity of cancer detection compared with PET/CT especially in case of the small T1a or T1b lesions. Moreover, when the conventional PET/CT and new PEM were combined, the detection sensitivity with [¹⁸F]FDG molecular imaging for T1 (N = 82) and T1a plus T1b breast cancer (N = 23) were 90% and 70%, respectively. The uptake of [¹⁸F]FDG was proportional to the histological malignancy of breast cancer. Using the newly-developed PEM with [¹⁸F]FDG, we are able to identify and characterize exactly the small breast tumors less than 10 mm in combination with the conventional PET/CT. These data indicate that PEM and PET/CT are synergic and complementary for the detection of small breast cancer.

Developments in Breast Imaging: Update on New and Evolving MR Imaging and Molecular Imaging Techniques

This article reviews new developments in breast imaging. There is growing interest in creating a shorter, less expensive MR protocol with broader applicability. There is an increasing focus on and consideration for the additive impact that functional analysis of breast pathology have on identifying and characterizing lesions. These developments apply to MR imaging and molecular imaging. This article reviews evolving breast imaging techniques with attention to strengths, weaknesses, and applications of these approaches. We aim to give the reader familiarity with the state of current developments in the field and to increase awareness of what to expect in breast imaging.

Decoding Intratumoral Heterogeneity of Breast Cancer by Multiparametric In Vivo Imaging: A Translational Study

Differential diagnosis and therapy of heterogeneous breast tumors poses a major clinical challenge. To address the need for a comprehensive, noninvasive strategy to define the molecular and functional profiles of tumors in vivo, we investigated a novel combination of metabolic PET and diffusion-weighted (DW)-MRI in the polyoma virus middle T antigen transgenic mouse model of breast cancer. The implementation of a voxelwise analysis for the clustering of intra- and intertumoral heterogeneity in this model resulted in a multiparametric profile based on [(18)F]Fluorodeoxyglucose ([(18)F]FDG)-PET and DW-MRI, which identified three distinct tumor phenotypes in vivo, including solid acinar, and solid nodular malignancies as well as cystic hyperplasia. To evaluate the feasibility of this approach for clinical use, we examined estrogen receptor-positive and progesterone receptor-positive breast tumors from five patient cases using DW-MRI and [(18)F]FDG-PET in a simultaneous PET/MRI system. The postsurgical in vivo PET/MRI data were correlated to whole-slide histology using the latter traditional diagnostic standard to define phenotype. By this approach, we showed how molecular, structural (microscopic, anatomic), and functional information could be simultaneously obtained noninvasively to identify precancerous and malignant subtypes within heterogeneous tumors. Combined with an automatized analysis, our results suggest that multiparametric molecular and functional imaging may be capable of providing comprehensive tumor profiling for noninvasive cancer diagnostics. Cancer Res; 76(18); 5512-22. ©2016 AACR.

Can positron emission mammography help to identify clinically significant breast cancer in women with suspicious calcifications on mammography?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of positron emission mammography (PEM) for identifying malignant lesions in patients with suspicious microcalcifications detected on mammography.

METHODS

A prospective, single-centre study that evaluated 40 patients with suspicious calcifications at mammography and indication for percutaneous or surgical biopsy, with mean age of 56.4 years (range: 28-81 years). Patients who agreed to participate in the study underwent PEM with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose before the final histological evaluation. PEM findings were compared with mammography and histological findings.

RESULTS

Most calcifications (n = 34; 85.0 %) were classified as BIRADS 4. On histology, there were 25 (62.5 %) benign and 15 (37.5 %) malignant lesions, including 11 (27.5 %) ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and 4 (10 %) invasive carcinomas. On subjective analysis, PEM was positive in 15 cases (37.5 %) and most of these cases (n = 14; 93.3 %) were confirmed as malignant on histology. There was one false-positive result, which corresponded to a fibroadenoma, and one false negative, which corresponded to an intermediate-grade DCIS. PEM had a sensitivity of 93.3 %, specificity of 96.0 % and accuracy of 95 %.

CONCLUSION

PEM was able to identify all invasive carcinomas and high-grade DCIS (nuclear grade 3) in the presented sample, suggesting that this method may be useful for further evaluation of patients with suspected microcalcifications.

KEY POINTS

• Many patients with suspicious microcalcifications at mammography have benign results at biopsy. • PEM may help to identify invasive carcinomas and high-grade DCIS. • Management of patients with suspicious calcifications can be improved.

The need for supplemental breast cancer screening modalities: a perspective of population-based breast cancer screening programs in Japan

PURPOSE

This article discusses possible supplemental breast cancer screening modalities for younger women with dense breasts from a perspective of population-based breast cancer screening program in Japan.

CONCLUSION

Supplemental breast cancer screening modalities have been proposed to increase the sensitivity and detection rates of early stage breast cancer in women with dense breasts; however, there are no global guidelines that recommend the use of supplemental breast cancer screening modalities in such women. Also, no criterion standard exists for breast density assessment. Based on the current situation of breast imaging in Japan, the possible supplemental breast cancer screening modalities are ultrasonography, digital breast tomosynthesis, and breast magnetic resonance imaging. An appropriate population-based breast cancer screening program based on the balance between cost and benefit should be a high priority. Further research based on evidence-based medicine is encouraged. It is very important that the ethnicity, workforce, workflow, and resources for breast cancer screening in each country should be considered when considering supplemental breast cancer screening modalities for women with dense breasts.