Generating harmonized SUV within the EANM EARL accreditation program: software approach versus EARL-compliant reconstruction

Assessment of regional and total skeletal metabolism using 18F-NaF PET/CT in patients with chronic kidney disease

OBJECTIVE

The study aims to assess regional and total bone metabolic activity in patients with chronic kidney disease using Na[18F]F PET and correlation between semi-quantitative indices and blood parameters.

METHODS

Seventy-two subjects (mean age 61.8 ± 13.8 years) were included. Of these 24/72 patients had end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (GFR < 15 mL/min/1.73 m2), 38/72 had chronic kidney disease (CKD) (GFR between 60 and 15 mL/min/1.73 m2), and 10/72 were controls with normal renal function. All subjects underwent Na[18F]F PET-CT with a dose activity of 0.06 mCi/Kg. Regional and total skeletal metabolism were assessed with mean SUVs in a skeletal volume of interest (VOI), bone to soft tissue index (B/S), global SUV mean (GSUV mean) of the whole bone, and uptake in the femoral neck.

RESULTS

Statistically significant differences were observed in a number of 18F-NaF metrics like femoral neck metabolism in CKD and ERSD groups in comparison to control in right (P = 0.003) and left femur (P = 0.006), bone to soft tissue index in the femur (P = 0.016) and GSUV5 (P = 0.006). There is also a significant difference in SUV mean in lumbar vertebrae (L1-L4) among CKD, ESRD, and controls. There was a moderate correlation between 18F-NaF PET scan uptake and blood parameters such as ALP and PTH. Na[18F]F uptake parameters were significantly different in low versus high bone turnover state.

CONCLUSIONS

The assessment of total skeleton and regional metabolism and bone turnover in CKD patients is feasible with Na[18F]F PET. Na[18F]F can help to detect early changes in bone metabolism and assess the progression of bone disease in this complex condition. Quantification with Na[18F]F PET might provide better assessment of the bone turnover. The difference in Na[18F]F uptake in CKD compared to controls is likely related to a change in bone turnover which, however, requires further validation.

Harmonization of standard uptake values across different positron emission tomography/computed tomography systems and different reconstruction algorithms: validation in oncology patients

BACKGROUND

EQ.PET is a software package that overcomes the reconstruction-dependent variation of standard uptake values (SUV). In this study, we validated the use of EQ.PET for harmonizing SUVs between different positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) systems and reconstruction algorithms.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 49 patients with various cancers were scanned on a Biograph mCT (mCT) or Gemini TF 16 (Gemini) after [¹⁸F]FDG injections. Three groups of patient data were collected: Group 1, patients scanned on mCT or Gemini with data reconstructed using two parameters; Group 2, patients scanned twice on different PET scanners (interval between two scans, 68.9 ± 41.4 days); and Group 3, patients scanned twice using mCT with data reconstructed using different algorithms (interval between two scans, 109.5 ± 60.6 days). The SUVs of the lesions and background were measured, and the tumor-to-background ratios (TBRs) were calculated. In addition, the consistency between the two reconstruction algorithms and confounding factors were evaluated.

RESULTS

In Group 1, the consistency of SUV and TBR between different reconstruction algorithms improved when the EQ.PET filter was applied. In Group 2, by comparing ΔSUV, ΔSUV%, ΔTBR, and ΔTBR% with and without the EQ.PET, the results showed significant differences (P < 0.05). In Group 3, Bland-Altman analysis of ΔSUV with EQ.PET showed an improved consistency relative to that without EQ.PET.

CONCLUSIONS

EQ.PET is an efficient tool to harmonize SUVs and TBRs across different reconstruction algorithms. Patients could benefit from the harmonized SUV, ΔSUV, and ΔSUV% for therapy responses and follow-up evaluations.

Detecting Interval Distant Metastases With 18F-FDG PET/CT After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer

PURPOSE

Patients with esophageal cancer can develop distant metastases between the start of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and planned surgery (ie, interval distant metastases). 18F-FDG PET/CT restaging after nCRT detects interval distant metastases in ~8% of patients. This study aimed to identify patients for whom 18F-FDG PET/CT restaging after nCRT could be omitted using an existing prediction model predicting for interval distant metastases or by using clinical stage groups.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer who underwent baseline and restaging 18F-FDG PET/CT, nCRT, and were planned for esophagectomy between 2017 and 2021 were eligible for inclusion in this retrospective study. The primary outcome was the existing model's external performance (ie, discrimination and calibration) for predicting interval distant metastases. The existing model predictors included tumor length, cN status, squamous cell carcinoma histology, and baseline SUVmax. The secondary outcome determined the clinical stage groups (AJCC/UICC eighth edition) for adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma for which the incidence of interval distant metastases was <10%.

RESULTS

In total, 127 patients were included, of whom 17 patients developed interval distant metastases (13%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 8%-21%) and 9 patients were deemed to have false-positive lesions on 18F-FDG PET/CT (7%; 95% CI, 2%-11%). Applying the existing model to this cohort yielded a discriminatory c-statistic of 0.56 (95% CI, 0.40-0.72). The calibration of the existing model was poor (ie, mostly underestimating the actual risk). The incidence of true-positive versus false-positive interval distant metastases for patients with clinical stage II disease was 5% versus 0%; clinical stage III, 14% versus 8%; and clinical stage IVa, 22% versus 9%.

CONCLUSIONS

The existing prediction model cannot reliably identify patients at risk for developing interval distant metastases after nCRT for esophageal cancer. Omission of 18F-FDG PET/CT restaging after nCRT could be considered in patients with clinical stage II esophageal cancer.

Implications of the Harmonization of [18F]FDG-PET/CT Imaging for Response Assessment of Treatment in Radiotherapy Planning

The purpose of this work is to present useful recommendations for the use of [¹⁸F]FDG-PET/CT imaging in radiotherapy planning and monitoring under different versions of EARL accreditation for harmonization of PET devices. A proof-of-concept experiment designed on an anthropomorphic phantom was carried out to establish the most suitable interpolation methods of the PET images in the different steps of the planning procedure. Based on PET/CT images obtained by using these optimal interpolations for the old EARL accreditation (EARL1) and for the new one (EARL2), the treatment plannings of representative actual clinical cases were calculated, and the clinical implications of the resulting differences were analyzed. As expected, EARL2 provided smaller volumes with higher resolution than EARL1. The increase in the size of the reconstructed volumes with EARL1 accreditation caused high doses in the organs at risk and in the regions adjacent to the target volumes. EARL2 accreditation allowed an improvement in the accuracy of the PET imaging precision, allowing more personalized radiotherapy. This work provides recommendations for those centers that intend to benefit from the new accreditation, EARL2, and can help build confidence of those that must continue working under the EARL1 accreditation.

Effects of tracer uptake time in non-small cell lung cancer 18F-FDG PET radiomics

Positron emission tomography (PET) radiomics applied to oncology allows the measurement of intra-tumoral heterogeneity. This quantification can be affected by image protocols hence there is an increased interest in understanding how radiomic expression on PET images is affected by different imaging conditions. To address that, this study explores how radiomic features are affected by changes in ¹⁸F-FDG uptake time, image reconstruction, lesion delineation, and radiomics binning settings. Methods: Ten non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients underwent ¹⁸F-FDG PET scans on two consecutive days. On each day, scans were obtained at 60min and 90min post-injection and reconstructed following EARL version 1 (EARL1) and with point-spread-function resolution modelling (PSF-EARL2). Lesions were delineated using thresholds at SUV=4.0, 40% of SUV_max, and with a contrast-based isocontour. PET image intensity was discretized with both fixed bin width (FBW) and fixed bin number (FBN) before the calculation of the radiomic features. Repeatability of features was measured with intraclass correlation (ICC), and the change in feature value over time was calculated as a function of its repeatability. Features were then classified on use-case scenarios based on their repeatability and susceptibility to tracer uptake time. Results: With PSF-EARL2 reconstruction, 40% of SUV_max lesion delineation, and FBW intensity discretization, most features (94%) were repeatable at both uptake times (ICC>0.9), 39% being classified for dual-time-point use-case for being sensitive to changes in uptake time, 39% were classified for cross-sectional studies with unclear dependency on time, 20% classified for cross-sectional use while being robust to tracer uptake time changes, and 6% were discarded for poor repeatability. EARL1 images had one less repeatable feature than PSF-EARL2 (Neighborhood Gray-Level Different Matrix Coarseness), the contrast-based delineation had the poorest repeatability of the delineation methods with 45% features being discarded, and FBN resulted in lower repeatability than FBW (45% and 6% features were discarded, respectively). Conclusion: Repeatability was maximized with PSF-EARL2 reconstruction, lesion delineation at 40% of SUV_max, and FBW intensity discretization. Based on their susceptibility to tracer uptake time, radiomic features were classified into specific NSCLC PET radiomics use-cases.

End-of-treatment 18F-FDG PET/CT in diffuse large B cell lymphoma patients: ΔSUV outperforms Deauville score

In DLBCL, the Deauville scoring system (DS) is the standard for PET/CT response assessment. An alternative system, based on the semi-quantitative change in standardized uptake values, namely ΔSUVmax, has been reported to be more objective than the DS. We aimed to compare ΔSUVmax and DS for risk stratification of DLBCL patients on end-of-treatment (EoT) PET. 108 consecutive patients were included. 2-year EFS Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and Cox regression models were performed. 2-year EFS was significantly different between favorable ΔSUVmax (favΔ < -86.5%) and unfavorable ΔSUVmax (unfavΔ ≥ -86.5%) patients: 100.0% ± 0.0 versus 58.3% ± 14.2 (p = 0.001). On Cox multivariable regression, ΔSUVmax status was the only independent predictor of 2-year EFS, outperforming DS. Therefore, ΔSUVmax should be computed for non-responder patients, especially DS4, as the 2-year EFS is not different between responders and non-responders in the case of favΔ. Further studies are needed in order to confirm this hypothesis.

Radiomics for radiation oncologists: are we ready to go?

Radiomics have emerged as an exciting field of research over the past few years, with very wide potential applications in personalised and precision medicine of the future. Radiomics-based approaches are still however limited in daily clinical practice in oncology. This review focus on how radiomics could be incorporated into the radiation therapy pipeline, and globally help the radiation oncologist, from the tumour diagnosis to follow-up after treatment. Radiomics could impact on all steps of the treatment pipeline, once the limitations in terms of robustness and reproducibility are overcome. Major ongoing efforts should be made to collect and share data in the most standardised manner possible.

Positron emission tomography PET/CT harmonisation study of different clinical PET/CT scanners using commercially available software

Objectives:

Harmonisation is the process whereby standardised uptake values from different scanners can be made comparable. This PET/CT pilot study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of harmonisation of a modern scanner with image reconstruction incorporating resolution recovery (RR) with another vendor older scanner operated in two-dimensional (2D) mode, and for both against a European standard (EARL). The vendor-proprietary software EQ•PET was used, which achieves harmonisation with a Gaussian smoothing. A substudy investigated effect of RR on harmonisation.

Methods:

Phantom studies on each scanner were performed to optimise the smoothing parameters required to achieve successful harmonisation. 80 patients were retrospectively selected; half were imaged on each scanner. As proof of principle, a cohort of 10 patients was selected from the modern scanner subjects to study the effects of RR on harmonisation.

Results:

Before harmonisation, the modern scanner without RR adhered to EARL specification. Using the phantom data, filters were derived for optimal harmonisation between scanners and with and without RR as applicable, to the EARL standard. The 80-patient cohort did not reveal any statistically significant differences. In the 10-patient cohort SUVmax for RR > no RR irrespective of harmonisation but differences lacked statistical significance (one-way ANOVA F(3.36) = 0.37, p = 0.78). Bland-Altman analysis showed that harmonisation reduced the SUVmax ratio between RR and no RR to 1.07 (95% CI 0.96–1.18) with no outliers.

Conclusions:

EQ•PET successfully enabled harmonisation between modern and older scanners and against the EARL standard. Harmonisation reduces SUVmax and dependence on the use of RR in the modern scanner.

Advances in knowledge:

EQ•PET is feasible to harmonise different PET/CT scanners and reduces the effect of RR on SUVmax.

Quantitative implications of the updated EARL 2019 PET-CT performance standards

PURPOSE

Recently, updated EARL specifications (EARL2) have been developed and announced. This study aims at investigating the impact of the EARL2 specifications on the quantitative reads of clinical PET-CT studies and testing a method to enable the use of the EARL2 standards whilst still generating quantitative reads compliant with current EARL standards (EARL1).

METHODS

Thirteen non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and seventeen lymphoma PET-CT studies were used to derive four image datasets-the first dataset complying with EARL1 specifications and the second reconstructed using parameters as described in EARL2. For the third (EARL2F6) and fourth (EARL2F7) dataset in EARL2, respectively, 6 mm and 7 mm Gaussian post-filtering was applied. We compared the results of quantitative metrics (MATV, SUVmax, SUVpeak, SUVmean, TLG, and tumor-to-liver and tumor-to-blood pool ratios) obtained with these 4 datasets in 55 suspected malignant lesions using three commonly used segmentation/volume of interest (VOI) methods (MAX41, A50P, SUV4).

RESULTS

We found that with EARL2 MAX41 VOI method, MATV decreases by 22%, TLG remains unchanged and SUV values increase by 23-30% depending on the specific metric used. The EARL2F7 dataset produced quantitative metrics best aligning with EARL1, with no significant differences between most of the datasets (p>0.05). Different VOI methods performed similarly with regard to SUV metrics but differences in MATV as well as TLG were observed. No significant difference between NSCLC and lymphoma cancer types was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Application of EARL2 standards can result in higher SUVs, reduced MATV and slightly changed TLG values relative to EARL1. Applying a Gaussian filter to PET images reconstructed using EARL2 parameters successfully yielded EARL1 compliant data.

Updating PET/CT performance standards and PET/CT interpretation criteria should go hand in hand

This letter aims at explaining that adjusting the performance of PET/CT systems to a new standard also requires updating of interpretation criteria. Simply changing one aspect of the imaging procedure, i.e., PET/CT performance and image quality, and not adapting interpretation criteria will result in an increase of false positive (or negative) reads.

Using EQ·PET to reduce reconstruction-dependent variations in [18F]FDG-PET brain imaging

This study aims at assessing whether EANM harmonisation strategy combined with EQ·PET methodology could be successfully applied to harmonize brain 2-deoxy-2[¹⁸F]fluoro-D-glucose ([¹⁸F]FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) images. The NEMA NU 2 body phantom was prepared according to the EANM guidelines with an [¹⁸F]FDG solution. Raw PET phantom data were reconstructed with three different reconstruction protocols frequently used in clinical PET brain imaging: ([Formula: see text]) Ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) 3D with time of flight (TOF), 2 iterations and 21 subsets; ([Formula: see text]) OSEM 3D with TOF, 6 iterations and 21 subsets; and ([Formula: see text]) OSEM 3D with TOF, point spread function (PSF), and 8 iterations and 21 subsets. EQ·PET filters were computed as the Gaussian smoothing that best independently aligned the recovery coefficients (RCs) of reconstructions [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] with the RCs of the reference reconstruction, [Formula: see text]. The performance of the EQ·PET filter to reduce variations in quantification due to differences in reconstruction was investigated using clinical PET brain images of 35 early-onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) patients. Qualitative assessments and multiple quantitative metrics on the cortical surface at different scale levels with or without partial volume effect correction were evaluated on the [¹⁸F]FDG brain data before and after application of the EQ·PET filter. The EQ·PET methodology succeeded in finding the optimal smoothing that minimised root-mean-square error (RMSE) calculated using human brain [¹⁸F]FDG-PET datasets of EOAD patients, providing harmonized comparisons in the neurological context. Performance was superior for TOF than for TOF  +  PSF reconstructions. Results showed the capability of the EQ·PET methodology to minimize reconstruction-induced variabilities between brain [¹⁸F]FDG-PET images. However, moderate variabilities remained after harmonizing PSF reconstructions with standard non-PSF OSEM reconstructions, suggesting that precautions should be taken when using PSF modelling.

Comprehensive analysis of the influence of G-CSF on the biodistribution of 18F-FDG in lymphoma patients: insights for PET/CT scheduling

Aims

(1) To perform a comprehensive analysis of the time elapsed between the last G-CSF injection and the PET/CT examination on the biodistribution of ¹⁸F-FDG, with emphasis on liver, spleen, and bone marrow uptake, and (2) to investigate whether an inversion of the liver to spleen ratio affects the Deauville scoring.

Materials and methods

Retrospectively included were 74 consecutive diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients referred for baseline and interim examinations and receiving immunochemotherapy with various G-CSF regimens. A comprehensive evaluation considering baseline metabolic active tumour volume (MATV), factors affecting liver uptake, the type of G-CSF, and the time elapsed between chemotherapy/G-CSF and interim PET/CTs was performed.

Results

Mean (± SD) percentage variations between baseline and interim PET/CTs (i-PET/CT) for bone marrow (%Variation__BONE), liver (%Variation__LIVER) and spleen (%Variation__SPLEEN) were equal to 32.0 ± 46.9%, 16.1 ± 42.8%, and 10.6 ± 51.1 %, respectively. %Variation__LIVER and %Variation__SPLEEN were higher in patients using lenograstim, but this was linked to lower uptakes at baseline and was therefore likely not due to G-CSF itself. The mean delay between G-CSF injection and i-PET/CT acquisition was not an independent explanatory variable for %Variation__BONE, %Variation__LIVER, and %Variation__SPLEEN. On the contrary, %Variation__BONE and %Variation__SPLEEN were negatively correlated to the time-lapse between the end of chemotherapy and i-PET/CT: ρ = − 0.342 (p = 0.010) and ρ = − 0.529 (p < 0.0001), respectively. Patients with a time-lapse since the last injection of chemotherapy < 17 days displayed higher bone and spleen SUVmax_EARL. %Variation__LIVER was positively correlated to baseline MATV: ρ = 0.243 (p = 0.039). Patients displaying a high baseline MATV ≥ 177 cc had significantly lower liver SUVmax_EARL at baseline. This difference was no longer observed at i-PET/CT, after tumours had shrunk.

Conclusions

Neither the type of G-CSF used nor the time elapsed between its last injection and i-PET/CT examination independently influences bone, hepatic, or splenic uptakes at i-PET/CT. The major determinant for the occurrence of a bone or spleen hypermetabolism on i-PET/CT is the time elapsed between the chemotherapy and the examination, which should be maintained above 15 days. Inversion of the liver to spleen ratio appeared to be due to increased spleen hypermetabolism on i-PET/CT, making unlikely an impact on the Deauville scoring.

A single preoperative blood test predicts postoperative sepsis and pneumonia after coronary bypass or open aneurysm surgery

BACKGROUND

Major surgery comes with a high risk for postoperative inflammatory complications. Preoperative risk scores predict mortality risk but fail to identify patients at risk for complications following cardiovascular surgery. We therefore assessed the value of preoperative red cell distribution width (RDW) as a predictor for pneumonia and sepsis after cardiovascular surgery and studied the relation of RDW with hematopoietic tissue activity.

METHODS

RDW is an easily accessible, yet seldomly used parameter from routine haematology measurements. RDW was extracted from the Utrecht Patient Orientated Database (UPOD) for preoperative measurements in patients undergoing open abdominal aortic anuerysm repair (AAA)(N = 136) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)(N = 2193). The cohorts were stratified in tertiles to assess effects over the different groups. Generalized Linear Models were used to determine associations between RDW and postoperative inflammatory complications. Hematopoietic tissue activity was scored using fluor-18-(18F)-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography and associated with RDW using linear regression models.

RESULTS

In total, 43(31.6%) and 73 patients (3.3%) suffered from inflammatory complications after AAA-repair or CABG, respectively; the majority being pneumonia in both cohorts. Postoperative inflammatory outcome incidence increased from 19.6% in the lowest to 48.9% in the highest RDW tertile with a corresponding risk ratio (RR) of 2.35 ([95%CI:1.08-5.14] P = 0.032) in AAA patients. In the CABG cohort, the incidence of postoperative inflammatory outcomes increased from 1.8% to 5.3% with an adjusted RR of 1.95 ([95%CI:1.02-3.75] P = 0.044) for the highest RDW tertile compared with the lowest RDW tertile. FDG-PET scans showed associations of RDW with tissue activity in the spleen (B = 0.517 [P = 0.001]) and the lumbar bone marrow (B = 0.480 [P = 0.004]).

CONCLUSION

Elevated RDW associates with increased risk for postoperative inflammatory complications and hematopoietic tissue activity. RDW likely reflects chronic low-grade inflammation and should be considered to identify patients at risk for postoperative inflammatory complications following cardiovascular surgery.

Repeatability of [18F]FDG PET/CT total metabolic active tumour volume and total tumour burden in NSCLC patients

Background

Total metabolic active tumour volume (TMATV) and total tumour burden (TTB) are increasingly studied as prognostic and predictive factors in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. In this study, we investigated the repeatability of TMATV and TTB as function of uptake interval, positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) image reconstruction settings, and lesion delineation method. We used six lesion delineation methods, four direct PET image-derived delineations and two based on a majority vote approach, i.e. intersection between two or more delineations (MV2) and between three or more delineations (MV3). To evaluate the accuracy of those methods, they were compared with a reference delineation obtained from the consensus of the segmentations performed by three experienced observers. Ten NSCLC patients underwent two baseline whole-body [¹⁸F]2-Fluoro-2-deoxy-2-D-glucose ([¹⁸F]FDG) PET/CT studies on separate days, within 3 days. Two scans were obtained on each day at 60 and 90 min post-injection to assess the influence of tracer uptake interval. PET/CT images were reconstructed following the European Association of Nuclear Medicine Research Ltd. (EARL) compliant settings and with point-spread-function (PSF) modelling. Repeatability between the measurements of each day was determined and the influence of uptake interval, reconstruction settings, and lesion delineation method was assessed using the generalized estimating equations model.

Results

Based on the Jaccard index with the reference delineation, the MV2 lesion delineation method was the most successful method for automated lesion segmentation. The best overall repeatability (lowest repeatability coefficient, RC) was found for TTB from 90 min of tracer uptake scans reconstructed with EARL compliant settings and delineated with 41% of lesion’s maximum SUV method (RC = 11%). In most cases, TMATV and TTB repeatability were not significantly affected by changes in tracer uptake time or reconstruction settings. However, some lesion delineation methods had significantly different repeatability when applied to the same images.

Conclusions

This study suggests that under some circumstances TMATV and TTB repeatability are significantly affected by the lesion delineation method used. Performing the delineation with a majority vote approach improves reliability and does not hamper repeatability, regardless of acquisition and reconstruction settings. It is therefore concluded that by using a majority vote based tumour segmentation approach, TMATV and TTB in NSCLC patients can be measured with high reliability and precision.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13550-019-0481-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

How to harmonize SUVs obtained by hybrid PET/CT scanners with and without point spread function correction

State of the art point-spread function (PSF) corrections implemented in positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) reconstruction improved image quality and diagnostic performance but caused an increase in the standardized uptake value (SUV) compared to a conventional OSEM reconstruction system. The EANM suggested one produce two reconstructions, one optimised for maximum lesion detection and one for semi-quantitative analysis. In this work we investigated an alternative methodology, using a single reconstruction data set together with a post-reconstruction algorithm for SUV harmonization. Data acquisition was performed on a Siemens Biograph mCT system equipped with lutetium oxyorthosilicat crystals, PSF and time-of-flight algorithms and on a General Electric Discovery STE system equipped with BGO crystals. Both a EANM double reconstruction method and a dedicated post-reconstruction algorithm (marketed as EQ-filter) were tested to harmonize the quantitative values of the two PET/CT scanners. For phantom measurements we used a NEMA IQ phantom and a Jaszczak cylindrical phantom equipped with small spheres (lesion to background ratios of 8:1 and 4:1). Several different reconstruction settings were tested in order to provide a general methodology. Data obtained by phantom measurements were validated on seven oncologic patients who performed a one-bed extra acquisition on a different scanner. The evaluation regarded 39 small lesions (diameters: 0.3-2.6 cm) and was performed by two experienced nuclear medicine physicians. The SUV recoveries measured with the PSF reconstruction exceeded those obtained by the OSEM reconstruction with deviations ranging from 16% to 150%. These discrepancies resulted below 7% applying the optimized value of the EQ.filter or the double-reconstruction methods. For each reconstruction setting the optimal value of the EQ.filter was identified in order to minimize these discrepancies. Patient data, analyzed by Wilcoxon statistical test, confirmed and validated phantom measurements. EQ.filter can harmonize SUV values between different PET/CT scanners using a single reconstruction optimized to maximum lesion detectability. In this way, the second reconstruction proposed by EANM/EARL is avoided.

Test-Retest Reproducibility of 18F-FDG PET/CT Uptake in Cancer Patients Within a Qualified and Calibrated Local Network

Calibration and reproducibility of quantitative ¹⁸F-FDG PET measures are essential for adopting integral ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT biomarkers and response measures in multicenter clinical trials. We implemented a multicenter qualification process using National Institute of Standards and Technology-traceable reference sources for scanners and dose calibrators, and similar patient and imaging protocols. We then assessed SUV in patient test-retest studies. Methods: Five ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scanners from 4 institutions (2 in a National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center, 3 in a community-based network) were qualified for study use. Patients were scanned twice within 15 d, on the same scanner (n = 10); different but same model scanners within an institution (n = 2); or different model scanners at different institutions (n = 11). SUV_max was recorded for lesions, and SUV_mean for normal liver uptake. Linear mixed models with random intercept were fitted to evaluate test-retest differences in multiple lesions per patient and to estimate the concordance correlation coefficient. Bland-Altman plots and repeatability coefficients were also produced. Results: In total, 162 lesions (82 bone, 80 soft tissue) were assessed in patients with breast cancer (n = 17) or other cancers (n = 6). Repeat scans within the same institution, using the same scanner or 2 scanners of the same model, had an average difference in SUV_max of 8% (95% confidence interval, 6%-10%). For test-retest on different scanners at different sites, the average difference in lesion SUV_max was 18% (95% confidence interval, 13%-24%). Normal liver uptake (SUV_mean) showed an average difference of 5% (95% confidence interval, 3%-10%) for the same scanner model or institution and 6% (95% confidence interval, 3%-11%) for different scanners from different institutions. Protocol adherence was good; the median difference in injection-to-acquisition time was 2 min (range, 0-11 min). Test-retest SUV_max variability was not explained by available information on protocol deviations or patient or lesion characteristics. Conclusion: ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scanner qualification and calibration can yield highly reproducible test-retest tumor SUV measurements. Our data support use of different qualified scanners of the same model for serial studies. Test-retest differences from different scanner models were greater; more resolution-dependent harmonization of scanner protocols and reconstruction algorithms may be capable of reducing these differences to values closer to same-scanner results.

Highlights from 2017: impactful topics published in the Annals of Nuclear Medicine

The aim of the review is to highlight articles published in 2017 in the Annals of Nuclear Medicine, an official peer-reviewed journal of the Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine. Among all published manuscripts during the past year, we conducted a subjective selection of the most relevant topics. Fourteen fascinating articles are included in this review, ranging in topic from preclinical to clinical arenas.

Why harmonization is needed when using FDG PET/CT as a prognosticator: demonstration with EARL-compliant SUV as an independent prognostic factor in lung cancer

BACKGROUND

To determine EARL-compliant prognostic SUV thresholds in a mature cohort of patients with locally advanced NSCLC, and to demonstrate how detrimental it is to use a threshold determined on an older-generation PET system with a newer PET/CT machine, and vice versa, or to use such a threshold with non-harmonized multicentre pooled data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a single-centre retrospective study including 139 consecutive stage IIIA-IIIB patients. PET data were acquired as per the EANM guidelines and reconstructed with unfiltered point spread function (PSF) reconstruction. Subsequently, a 6.3 mm Gaussian filter was applied using the EQ.PET (Siemens Healthineers) methodology to meet the EANM/EARL harmonizing standards (PSF_EARL). A multicentre study including non-EARL-compliant systems was simulated by randomly creating four groups of patients whose images were reconstructed with unfiltered PSF and PSF with Gaussian post-filtering of 3, 5, and 10 mm. Identification of optimal SUV thresholds was based on a two-fold cross-validation process that partitioned the overall sample into learning and validation subsamples. Proportional Cox hazards models were used to estimate age-adjusted and multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals. Kaplan-Meier curves were compared using the log rank test.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 28 months (1-104 months). For the whole population, the estimated overall survival rate at 36 months was 0.39 [0.31-0.47]. The optimal SUV_max cutoff value was 25.43 (95% CI: 23.41-26.31) and 8.47 (95% CI: 7.23-9.31) for the PSF and for the EARL-compliant dataset respectively. These SUV_max cutoff values were both significantly and independently associated with lung cancer mortality; HRs were 1.73 (1.05-2.84) and 1.92 (1.16-3.19) for the PSF and the EARL-compliant dataset respectively. When (i) applying the optimal PSF SUV_max cutoff on an EARL-compliant dataset and the optimal EARL SUV_max cutoff on a PSF dataset or (ii) applying the optimal EARL compliant SUV_max cutoff to a simulated multicentre dataset, the tumour SUV_max was no longer significantly associated with lung cancer mortality.

CONCLUSION

The present study provides the PET community with an EARL-compliant SUV_max as an independent prognosticator for advanced NSCLC that should be confirmed in a larger cohort, ideally at other EARL accredited centres, and highlights the need to harmonize PET quantitative metrics when using them for risk stratification of patients.

Multicenter study of quantitative PET system harmonization using NIST-traceable 68Ge/68Ga cross-calibration kit

PURPOSE

The present study aimed to define the errors in SUV and demonstrate the feasibility of SUV harmonization among contemporary PET/CT scanners using a novel National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)-traceable ⁶⁸Ge/⁶⁸Ga source as the reference standard.

METHODS

We used ⁶⁸Ge/⁶⁸Ga dose calibrator and PET sources made with same batch of ⁶⁸Ge/⁶⁸Ga embedded in epoxy that is traceable to the NIST standard. Bias in the amount of radioactivity and the radioactive concentrations measured by the dose calibrators and PET/CT scanners, respectively, was determined at five Japanese sites. We adjusted optimal dial setting of the dose calibrators and PET reconstruction parameters to close the actual amount of radioactivity and the radioactive concentration, respectively, of the NIST-traceable ⁶⁸Ge/⁶⁸Ga sources to harmonize SUV. Errors in SUV before and after harmonization were then calculated at each site.

RESULTS

The average bias in the amount of radioactivity and the radioactive concentrations measured by dose calibrator and PET scanner was -4.94% and -12.22%, respectively, before, and -0.14% and -4.81%, respectively, after harmonization. Corresponding averaged errors in SUV measured under clinical conditions were underestimated by 7.66%, but improved by -4.70% under optimal conditions.

CONCLUSION

Our proposed method using an NIST-traceable ⁶⁸Ge/⁶⁸Ga source identified bias in values obtained using dose calibrators and PET scanners, and reduced SUV variability to within 5% across different models of PET scanners at five sites. Our protocol using a standard source has considerable potential for harmonizing the SUV when contemporary PET scanners are involved in multicenter studies.

Does PET Reconstruction Method Affect Deauville Score in Lymphoma Patients?

When evaluating ¹⁸F-FDG PET images with the Deauville score (DS), the quantification of tumor and reference organs limits the problem of optical misinterpretation. Compared with conventional reconstruction algorithms, point-spread function (PSF) modeling increases SUVs significantly in tumors but only moderately in the liver, which could affect the DS. We investigated whether the choice of the reconstruction algorithm affects the DS and whether discordance affects the capability of ¹⁸F-FDG PET to stratify lymphoma patients. Methods: Overall, 126 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma were included (56 female and 70 male; median age, 65 y; range, 20-88 y). PET data were reconstructed with the unfiltered PSF method. Additionally, a 6-mm filter was applied to PSF images to meet the requirements of the EANM Research Ltd. (EARL) harmonization program from the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) (PSF_EARL). One hundred interim PET (i-PET) and 95 end-of-treatment PET (EoT-PET) studies were analyzed. SUV_max in the liver and aorta was determined using automatic volumes of interest and compared with SUV_max in the residual mass with the highest ¹⁸F-FDG uptake. Results: For i-PET, using PSF and PSF_EARL, we classified patients as responders and nonresponders in 60 and 40 cases versus 63 and 37 cases, respectively. Five cases of major discordance (5.0%) occurred (i.e., changes from responder to nonresponder). For Eot-PET, patients were classified using PSF and PSF_EARL as responders and nonresponders in 69 and 26 cases versus 72 and 23 cases, respectively. Three cases of major discordance (3.2%) occurred. Concordance (Cohen unweighted κ) between the PSF and the PSF_EARL DS was 0.82 (95% confidence interval, 0.73-0.91) for i-PET and 0.89 (95% confidence interval, 0.81-0.96) for EoT-PET. The median follow-up periods were 28.4 and 27.4 mo for i-PET and EoT-PET, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed statistically significant differences in progression-free survival and overall survival among responders and nonresponders no matter which reconstruction was used for i-PET and EoT-PET. Conclusion: Neither DS nor risk stratification of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients is affected by the choice of PET reconstruction. Specifically, the use of PSF is not an issue in routine clinical processes or in multicenter trials. These findings have to be confirmed in escalation and deescalation procedures based on early i-PET.

Impact of the EARL harmonization program on automatic delineation of metabolic active tumour volumes (MATVs)

BACKGROUND

The clinical validation of the EARL harmonization program for standardised uptake value (SUV) metrics is well documented; however, its potential for defining metabolic active tumour volume (MATV) has not yet been investigated. We aimed to compare delineation of MATV on images reconstructed using conventional ordered subset expectation maximisation (OSEM) with those reconstructed using point spread function modelling (PSF-reconstructed images), and either optimised for diagnostic potential (PSF) or filtered to meet the EANM/EARL harmonising standards (PSF7).

METHODS

Images from 18 stage IIIA-IIIB lung cancer patients were reconstructed using all the three methods. MATVs were then delineated using both a 40% isocontour and a gradient-based method. MATVs were compared by means of Bland-Altman analyses, and Dice coefficients and concordance indices based on the unions and intersections between each pair of reconstructions (PSF vs OSEM, PSF7 vs PSF and PSF7 vs OSEM).

RESULTS

Using the 40% isocontour method and taking the MATVs delineated on OSEM images as a reference standard, the use of PSF7 images led to significantly higher Dice coefficients (median value = 0.96 vs 0.77; P < 0.0001) and concordance indices (median value = 0.92 vs 0.64; P < 0.0001) than those obtained using PSF images. The gradient-based methodology was less sensitive to reconstruction variability than the 40% isocontour method; Dice coefficients and concordance indices were superior to 0.8 for both PSF reconstruction methods. However, the use of PSF7 images led to narrower interquartile ranges and significantly higher Dice coefficients (median value = 0.96 vs 0.94; P = 0.01) and concordance indices (median value = 0.89 vs 0.85; P = 0.003) than those obtained with PSF images.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that automatic contouring of lung tumours on EARL-compliant PSF images using the widely adopted automatic isocontour methodology is an accurate means of overcoming reconstruction variability in MATV delineation. Although gradient-based methodology appears to be less sensitive to reconstruction variability, the use of EARL-compliant PSF images significantly improved the Dice coefficients and concordance indices, demonstrating the importance of harmonised-images, even when more advanced contouring algorithms are used.

Multidisciplinary quality assurance and control in oncological trials: Perspectives from European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)

Quality assurance (QA) programmes are one of the mainstays of clinical research and constitute the pillars on which European Organisation for Research Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) delivers multidisciplinary therapeutic progress. Changing practice treatments require solid evidence-based data, which can only be achieved if integral QA is part of the infrastructure sustaining research projects. Cancer treatment is a multimodality approach, which is often applied either in sequence and/or in combination. Each modality plays a key role in cancer control. The modalities by which QA is applied varies substantially within and across the disciplines. In addition, translational and diagnostic disciplines take an increasing role in the era of precision medicine. Building on the structuring effect of clinical research with fully integrated multidisciplinary QA programmes associated with the solutions addressing the chain of custody for biological material and data integrity as well as compliance ensure at the same time validity of clinical research output but also have a training effect on health care providers, who are more likely to apply such principles as routine. The principles of QA are therefore critical to be embedded in multidisciplinary infrastructure to guarantee therapeutic progress. These principles also provide the basis for the functioning of multidisciplinary tumour board. However, technical, operational and economic challenges which go with the implementation of such programmes require optimal know-how and the coordination of the multiple expertise and such efforts are best achieved through centralised infrastructure.

Quantification, improvement, and harmonization of small lesion detection with state-of-the-art PET

In recent years, there have been multiple advances in positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) that improve cancer imaging. The present generation of PET/CT scanners introduces new hardware, software, and acquisition methods. This review describes these new developments, which include time-of-flight (TOF), point-spread-function (PSF), maximum-a-posteriori (MAP) based reconstruction, smaller voxels, respiratory gating, metal artefact reduction, and administration of quadratic weight-dependent 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) activity. Also, hardware developments such as continuous bed motion (CBM), (digital) solid-state photodetectors and combined PET and magnetic resonance (MR) systems are explained. These novel techniques have a significant impact on cancer imaging, as they result in better image quality, improved small lesion detectability, and more accurate quantification of radiopharmaceutical uptake. This influences cancer diagnosis and staging, as well as therapy response monitoring and radiotherapy planning. Finally, the possible impact of these developments on the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) guidelines and EANM Research Ltd. (EARL) accreditation for FDG-PET/CT tumor imaging is discussed.

EANM/EARL harmonization strategies in PET quantification: from daily practice to multicentre oncological studies

Quantitative positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) can be used as diagnostic or prognostic tools (i.e. single measurement) or for therapy monitoring (i.e. longitudinal studies) in multicentre studies. Use of quantitative parameters, such as standardized uptake values (SUVs), metabolic active tumor volumes (MATVs) or total lesion glycolysis (TLG), in a multicenter setting requires that these parameters be comparable among patients and sites, regardless of the PET/CT system used. This review describes the motivations and the methodologies for quantitative PET/CT performance harmonization with emphasis on the EANM Research Ltd. (EARL) Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT accreditation program, one of the international harmonization programs aiming at using FDG PET as a quantitative imaging biomarker. In addition, future accreditation initiatives will be discussed. The validation of the EARL accreditation program to harmonize SUVs and MATVs is described in a wide range of tumor types, with focus on therapy assessment using either the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) criteria or PET Evaluation Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST), as well as liver-based scales such as the Deauville score. Finally, also presented in this paper are the results from a survey across 51 EARL-accredited centers reporting how the program was implemented and its impact on daily routine and in clinical trials, harmonization of new metrics such as MATV and heterogeneity features.

EORTC PET response criteria are more influenced by reconstruction inconsistencies than PERCIST but both benefit from the EARL harmonization program

Background

This study evaluates the consistency of PET evaluation response criteria in solid tumours (PERCIST) and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) classification across different reconstruction algorithms and whether aligning standardized uptake values (SUVs) to the European Association of Nuclear Medicine acquisition (EANM)/EARL standards provides more consistent response classification.

Materials and methods

Baseline (_PET1) and response assessment (_PET2) scans in 61 patients with non-small cell lung cancer were acquired in protocols compliant with the EANM guidelines and were reconstructed with point-spread function (PSF) or PSF + time-of-flight (TOF) reconstruction for optimal tumour detection and with a standardized ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) reconstruction known to fulfil EANM harmonizing standards. Patients were recruited in three centres. Following reconstruction, EQ.PET, a proprietary software solution was applied to the PSF ± TOF data (PSF ± TOF.EQ) to harmonize SUVs to the EANM standards. The impact of differing reconstructions on PERCIST and EORTC classification was evaluated using standardized uptake values corrected for lean body mass (SUL).

Results

Using OSEM_PET1/OSEM_PET2 (standard scenario), responders displayed a reduction of −57.5% ± 23.4 and −63.9% ± 22.4 for SUL_max and SUL_peak, respectively, while progressing tumours had an increase of +63.4% ± 26.5 and +60.7% ± 19.6 for SUL_max and SUL_peak respectively. The use of PSF ± TOF reconstruction impacted the classification of tumour response. For example, taking the OSEM_PET1/PSF ± TOF_PET2 scenario reduced the apparent reduction in SUL in responding tumours (−39.7% ± 31.3 and −55.5% ± 26.3 for SUL_max and SUL_peak, respectively) but increased the apparent increase in SUL in progressing tumours (+130.0% ± 50.7 and +91.1% ± 39.6 for SUL_max and SUL_peak, respectively).

Consequently, variation in reconstruction methodology (PSF ± TOF_PET1/OSEM_PET2 or OSEM _PET1/PSF ± TOF_PET2) led, respectively, to 11/61 (18.0%) and 10/61 (16.4%) PERCIST classification discordances and to 17/61 (28.9%) and 19/61 (31.1%) EORTC classification discordances. An agreement was better for these scenarios with application of the propriety filter, with kappa values of 1.00 and 0.95 compared to 0.75 and 0.77 for PERCIST and kappa values of 0.93 and 0.95 compared to 0.61 and 0.55 for EORTC, respectively.

Conclusion

PERCIST classification is less sensitive to reconstruction algorithm-dependent variability than EORTC classification but harmonizing SULs within the EARL program is equally effective with either.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40658-017-0185-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Harmonizing standardized uptake value recovery between two PET/CT systems from different manufacturers when using resolution modelling and time-of-flight

PET iterative reconstruction algorithms with resolution modelling (RM) can be used to improve spatial resolution in the images. However, RM has a significant impact on quantification, which raises issues for harmonization across multicentre networks or collaborations. This investigation compared quantification from two modern time-of-flight (TOF) PET/CT systems from different manufacturers with RM with the intention to harmonize recovery. Images of a National Electrical Manufacturers Association image quality phantom with a sphere-to-background concentration ratio of 4 : 1 were acquired on a GE Discovery 710 and a Siemens Biograph mCT and reconstructed with RM and TOF. Voxel dimensions and image noise (background coefficient of variation) were matched. One to five iterations were used with 2 and 4 mm Gaussian filters. Mean and maximum contrast recovery (CR) were measured for the 10, 13, 17 and 22 mm hot phantom spheres. Notable differences in CR for images reconstructed with matched reconstruction parameters were observed between the scanners. A set of parameters was found that reduced differences in CR between scanners. Using these parameters, relative differences for the Biograph compared with the Discovery were -8.1, -3.7, +7 and +0.7% for mean CR and -23.1, -6.9, +9.1 and +0.9% for maximum CR in the 10, 13, 17 and 22 mm spheres, respectively. This study has used a technique of harmonizing standardized uptake value recovery on PET/CT systems from different vendors with advanced reconstructions including TOF and RM using phantom data. Considerable quantitative differences may occur in images, which highlights the need to apply methods such as those used in this work for multicentre studies.

Digital PET compliance to EARL accreditation specifications

Background

Our aim was to evaluate if a recently introduced TOF PET system with digital photon counting technology (Philips Healthcare), potentially providing an improved image quality over analogue systems, can fulfil EANM research Ltd (EARL) accreditation specifications for tumour imaging with FDG-PET/CT.

Findings

We have performed a phantom study on a digital TOF PET system using a NEMA NU2-2001 image quality phantom with six fillable spheres. Phantom preparation and PET/CT acquisition were performed according to the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) guidelines. We made list-mode ordered-subsets expectation maximization (OSEM) TOF PET reconstructions, with default settings, three voxel sizes (4 × 4 × 4 mm³, 2 × 2 × 2 mm³ and 1 × 1 × 1 mm³) and with/without point spread function (PSF) modelling.

On each PET dataset, mean and maximum activity concentration recovery coefficients (RC_mean and RC_max) were calculated for all phantom spheres and compared to EARL accreditation specifications. The RCs of the 4 × 4 × 4 mm³ voxel dataset without PSF modelling proved closest to EARL specifications. Next, we added a Gaussian post-smoothing filter with varying kernel widths of 1–7 mm. EARL specifications were fulfilled when using kernel widths of 2 to 4 mm.

Conclusions

TOF PET using digital photon counting technology fulfils EARL accreditation specifications for FDG-PET/CT tumour imaging when using an OSEM reconstruction with 4 × 4 × 4 mm³ voxels, no PSF modelling and including a Gaussian post-smoothing filter of 2 to 4 mm.