Inhaled antibiotic therapy for ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis and ventilator-associated pneumonia: an update

Opportunistic etiological agents causing lung infections: emerging need to transform lung-targeted delivery

Lung diseases continue to draw considerable attention from biomedical and public health care agencies. The lung with the largest epithelial surface area is continuously exposed to the external environment during exchanging gas. Therefore, the chances of respiratory disorders and lung infections are overgrowing. This review has covered promising and opportunistic etiologic agents responsible for lung infections. These pathogens infect the lungs either directly or indirectly. However, it is difficult to intervene in lung diseases using available oral or parenteral antimicrobial formulations. Many pieces of research have been done in the last two decades to improve inhalable antimicrobial formulations. However, very few have been approved for human use. This review article discusses the approved inhalable antimicrobial agents (AMAs) and identifies why pulmonary delivery is explored. Additionally, the basic anatomy of the respiratory system linked with barriers to AMA delivery has been discussed here. This review opens several new scopes for researchers to work on pulmonary medicines for specific diseases and bring more respiratory medication to market.

Status of inhalable antimicrobial agents for lung infection: progress and prospects

Introduction: Available parenteral and oral administration of antimicrobial agents (AMAs) in respiratory infections often show less penetration into the lung parenchyma. Due to inappropriate dose availability, the rate of antibiotic resistance is increasing gradually. Inhaled antibiotics intensely improve the availability of drugs at the site of respiratory infections. This targeted delivery minimizes systemic exposure and associated toxicity.Area covers: This review was performed by searching in the scientific database like PubMed and several trusted government sites like fda.gov, cdc.gov, ClinicalTrials.gov, etc. For better understanding, AMAs are classified in different stages of approval. Mechanism and characterization of pulmonary drug deposition section helps to understand the effective delivery of AMAs to the respiratory tract. There is a need for proper adoption of delivery devices for inhalable AMAs. Thus, delivery devices are extensively explained. Inspiratory flow has a remarkable impact on the delivery device that has been explained in detail.Expert opinion: Pulmonary delivery restricts the bulk administration of drugs in comparison with other routes. Therefore, novel AMAs with higher bactericidal activity at lower concentrations need to be synthesized. Extensive research is indeed in developing innovative delivery devices that would able to deliver higher doses of AMAs through the pulmonary route.

Mechanistic research holds promise for bacterial vaccines and phage therapies for Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Vaccines for Pseudomonas aeruginosa have been of longstanding interest to immunologists, bacteriologists, and clinicians, due to the widespread prevalence of hospital-acquired infection. As P. aeruginosa becomes increasingly antibiotic resistant, there is a dire need for novel treatments and preventive vaccines. Despite intense efforts, there currently remains no vaccine on the market to combat this dangerous pathogen. This article summarizes current and past vaccines under development that target various constituents of P. aeruginosa. Targeting lipopolysaccharides and O-antigens have shown some promise in preventing infection. Recombinant flagella and pili that target TLR5 have been utilized to combat P. aeruginosa by blocking its motility and adhesion. The type 3 secretion system components, such as needle-like structure PcrV or exotoxin PopB, are also potential vaccine targets. Outer membrane proteins including OprF and OprI are newer representatives of vaccine candidates. Live attenuated vaccines are a focal point in this review, and are also considered for novel vaccines. In addition, phage therapy is revived as an effective option for treating refractory infections after failure with antibiotic treatment. Many of the aforementioned vaccines act on a single target, thus lacking a broad range of protection. Recent studies have shown that mixtures of vaccines and combination approaches may significantly augment immunogenicity, thereby increasing their preventive and therapeutic potential.

Nebulized Versus IV Amikacin as Adjunctive Antibiotic for Hospital and Ventilator-Acquired Pneumonia Postcardiac Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

Nebulized antibiotics offer high efficacy due to significant local concentrations and safety with minimal blood levels. This study evaluates the efficacy and nephrotoxicity of nebulized versus IV amikacin in postcardiothoracic surgical patients with nosocomial pneumonia caused by multidrug-resistant Gram- negative bacilli.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, controlled study on surgical patients divided into two groups.

SETTING

Postcardiac surgery ICU.

INTERVENTIONS

The first gtroup was administered IV amikacin 20 mg/kg once daily. The second group was prescribed amikacin nebulizer 400 mg twice daily. Both groups were co-administered IV piperacillin/tazobactam empirically.

PATIENTS

Recruited patients were diagnosed by either hospital-acquired pneumonia or ventilator-associated pneumonia where 56 (42.1%) patients were diagnosed with hospital-acquired pneumonia, 51 (38.34%) patients were diagnosed with early ventilator-associated pneumonia, and 26 (19.54%) patients with late ventilator-associated pneumonia.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Clinical cure in both groups assessed on day 7 of treatment was the primary outcome. Efficacy was additionally evaluated through assessing the length of hospital stay, ICU stay, days on amikacin, days on mechanical ventilator, mechanical ventilator-free days, days to reach clinical cure, and mortality rate. Lower nephrotoxicity in the nebulized group was observed through significant preservation of kidney function (p < 0.001). Although both groups were comparable regarding length of hospital stay, nebulizer group showed shorter ICU stay (p = 0.010), lower number of days to reach complete clinical cure (p = 0.001), fewer days on mechanical ventilator (p = 0.035), and fewer days on amikacin treatment (p = 0.022).

CONCLUSION

Nebulized amikacin showed better clinical cure rates, less ICU stay, and fewer days to reach complete recovery compared to IV amikacin for surgical patients with nosocomial pneumonia. It is also a less nephrotoxic option associated with less deterioration in kidney function.

The Rationale and Evidence for Use of Inhaled Antibiotics to Control Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection in Non-cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis

Non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFBE) is a chronic inflammatory lung disease characterized by irreversible dilation of the bronchi, symptoms of persistent cough and expectoration, and recurrent infective exacerbations. The prevalence of NCFBE is on the increase in the United States and Europe, but no licensed therapies are currently available for its treatment. Although there are many similarities between NCFBE and cystic fibrosis (CF) in terms of respiratory symptoms, airway microbiology, and disease progression, there are key differences, for example, in response to treatment, suggesting differences in pathogenesis. This review discusses possible reasons underlying differences in response to inhaled antibiotics in people with CF and NCFBE. Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections are associated with the most severe forms of bronchiectasis. Suboptimal levels of antibiotics in the lung increase the mutation frequency of P. aeruginosa and lead to the development of mucoid strains characterized by formation of a protective polysaccharide biofilm. Mucoid strains of P. aeruginosa are associated with a chronic infection stage, requiring long-term antibiotic therapy. Inhaled antibiotics provide targeted delivery to the lung with minimal systemic toxicity and adverse events compared with oral/intravenous routes of administration, and they could be alternative treatment options to help address some of the treatment challenges in the management of severe cases of NCFBE. This review provides an overview of completed and ongoing trials that evaluated inhaled antibiotic therapy for NCFBE. Recently, several investigators conducted phase 3 randomized controlled trials with inhaled aztreonam and ciprofloxacin in patients with NCFBE. While the aztreonam trial results were not associated with significant clinical benefit in NCFBE, initial results reported from the inhaled ciprofloxacin (dry powder for inhalation and liposome-encapsulated/dual-release formulations) trials hold promise. A more targeted approach could identify specific populations of NCFBE patients who benefit from inhaled antibiotics.

In vitro evaluation of aerosol delivery of aztreonam lysine (AZLI): an adult mechanical ventilation model

BACKGROUND

The delivery profile of Aztreonam lysine (AZLI) during mechanical ventilation (MV) is unknown. We evaluated the amount of AZLI drug delivered using an in vitro model of adult MV.

METHODS

An adult lung model designed to mimic current clinical practice was used. Both nebulizers were placed before a Y-piece and 4 settings were tested: A) Aeroneb solo® [AS] with a t-piece; B) AS with the spacer; C) M-Neb® [MN] with a t-piece and D) MN with the spacer. Performance was evaluated in terms of: 1) Mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD); 2) Geometric standard deviation (GSD), 3) Fine particle dose (FPD), 4) Fine particle fraction (FPF), 5) Inhalable mass (IM), and 6) Recovery rate (RR).

RESULTS

Both devices showed an adequate delivery of AZLI during MV, with MMAD between 2.4-2.5 µm and 87% of FPF. The FPD (38.8 and 31.7), IM (44.8 and 36.1) and RR (30 and 24) were similar for AS and MN respectively. Nebulizer aerosol delivery increased (50 and 70% respectively) for both nebulizers when using the spacer.

CONCLUSION

Both AS and MN showed a good aerosol delivery profile for AZLI during in vitro mechanical ventilation. Better aerosol delivery performance was obtained using the spacer.

Clinical Features and Antimicrobial Resistance of Bacterial Agents of Ventilator-Associated Tracheobronchitis in Hamedan, Iran

OBJECTIVES

Ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis (VAT) is a common cause of mortality and morbidity in patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs). This study was conducted to evaluate the clinical course, etiology, and antimicrobial resistance of bacterial agents of VAT in ICUs in Hamedan, Iran.

METHODS

During a 12-month period, all patients with VAT in a medical and a surgical ICU were included. The criteria for the diagnosis of VAT were fever, mucus production, a positive culture of tracheal secretions, and the absence of lung infiltration. Clinical course, including changes in temperature and tracheal secretions, and outcomes were followed. The endotracheal aspirates were cultured on blood agar and chocolate agar, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of isolates were performed using the disk diffusion method.

RESULTS

Of the 1 070 ICU patients, 69 (6.4%) were diagnosed with VAT. The mean interval between the patient's intubation and the onset of symptoms was 4.7±8.5 days. The mean duration of response to treatment was 4.9±4.7 days. A total of 23 patients (33.3%) progressed to ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), and 38 patients (55.0%) died. The most prevalent bacterial isolates included Acinetobacter baumannii (24.6%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (20.2%), and Enterobacter (13.0%). P. aeruginosa and Enterobacter were the most prevalent bacteria in surgical ICU, and A. baumannii and K. pneumoniae were the most common in the medical ICU. All A. baumannii and Citrobacter species were multidrug-resistant (MDR). MDR pathogens were more prevalent in medical ICU compared to surgical ICU (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

VAT increases the rates of progression to VAP, the need for tracheostomy, and the incidence of mortality in ICUs. Most bacterial agents of VAT are MDR. Preventive policies for VAP, including the use of ventilator care bundle, and appropriate empirical antibiotic therapy for VAT may reduce the incidence of VAP.

Antibacterial activity of human simulated epithelial lining fluid concentrations of amikacin inhale alone and in combination with meropenem against Acinetobacter baumannii

BACKGROUND

Acinetobacter baumannii(ACBN) is a MDR organism causing pneumonia in ventilated patients. High MICs often result in insufficient lung exposures, thus poor outcomes have been observed with parenteral antimicrobials. Amikacin Inhale(AMK-I), is a drug-device combination of amikacin and a Pulmonary Drug Delivery System device. We aimed to describe the pharmacodynamic profile of human simulated epithelial lining fluid(ELF) exposures of AMK-I and intravenous meropenem alone and in combination against ACBN with variable susceptibility profiles.

METHODS

AMK-I ELF exposures and the ELF profile of meropenem achieved after intravenous administration were evaluated in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model. Nine ACBN with amikacin/meropenem MICs of 2-512/2 to >64 mg/L were utilized. MICs were repeated post exposure to assess the development of resistance.

RESULTS

AMK-I monotherapy rapidly achieved and sustained bactericidal activity for isolates with amikacin MIC ≤128 mg/L. For isolates with MICs of 256 and 512 mg/L initial reductions in bacterial density were observed followed by regrowth. The combination produced similar bactericidal activity against ACBN with amikacin MICs of ≤128. While the combination regimen produced initial reductions and prolonged the duration of activity against organisms with MICs of 256 and 512 mg/L, regrowth and MIC elevations were noted during the 72-h exposure period.

CONCLUSION

The combination achieved rapid and sustained efficacy when amikacin MICs were ≤128 mg/L and prolonged the duration of activity compared to monotherapy for organisms with MICs 256 mg/L and 512 mg/L. These data support the utility of AMK-I as an adjunct for the treatment of pneumonia caused by A. baumannii with MICs above current susceptibility break-points.

Characteristics of an ideal nebulized antibiotic for the treatment of pneumonia in the intubated patient

Gram-negative pneumonia in patients who are intubated and mechanically ventilated is associated with increased morbidity and mortality as well as higher healthcare costs compared with those who do not have the disease. Intravenous antibiotics are currently the standard of care for pneumonia; however, increasing rates of multidrug resistance and limited penetration of some classes of antimicrobials into the lungs reduce the effectiveness of this treatment option, and current clinical cure rates are variable, while recurrence rates remain high. Inhaled antibiotics may have the potential to improve outcomes in this patient population, but their use is currently restricted by a lack of specifically formulated solutions for inhalation and a limited number of devices designed for the nebulization of antibiotics. In this article, we review the challenges clinicians face in the treatment of pneumonia and discuss the characteristics that would constitute an ideal inhaled drug/device combination. We also review inhaled antibiotic options currently in development for the treatment of pneumonia in patients who are intubated and mechanically ventilated.

Antibacterial activity of achievable epithelial lining fluid exposures of Amikacin Inhale with or without meropenem

OBJECTIVES

While Amikacin Inhale (BAY41-6551), an integrated drug-device combination under development, achieves an estimated amikacin epithelial lining fluid (ELF) concentration of ∼ 5000 mg/L, its target site pharmacodynamics are unknown. We evaluated the pharmacodynamics of ELF exposure of inhaled amikacin ± meropenem.

METHODS

ELF exposures of inhaled amikacin (400 mg every 12 h), intravenous meropenem (2 g every 8 h) and a combination of both were studied in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model. Seven Klebsiella pneumoniae and 10 Pseudomonas aeruginosa with amikacin/meropenem MICs of 1 to 32,768/≤ 0.125 to >128 mg/L were included. Efficacy was assessed over 24-72 h.

RESULTS

The mean ± SD 0 h bacterial density was 6.5 ± 0.1 log10 cfu/mL. Controls grew to 8.0 ± 0.5 log10 cfu/mL by the end of the experiments. Simulation of inhaled amikacin monotherapy rapidly achieved and sustained bactericidal activity near the limit of detection over 24 h for all 13 isolates with amikacin MIC ≤ 256 mg/L except only ∼ 2 log10 cfu/mL reduction was observed in K. pneumoniae 375 (amikacin/meropenem MIC 64/32 mg/L) and P. aeruginosa 1544 (amikacin/meropenem MIC 64/128 mg/L). No activity was seen against the three isolates with amikacin MIC ≥ 2048 mg/L. Among the six isolates tested with meropenem monotherapy, five (meropenem MIC ≥ 16 mg/L) grew similarly to the controls while one (meropenem MIC 2 mg/L) achieved ∼ 2.5 log10 cfu/mL decrease. Among seven isolates tested in combination, four (amikacin/meropenem MIC ≤ 64/32 mg/L), including K. pneumoniae 375, maintained limit of detection until 72 h, whereas P. aeruginosa 1544 sustained a 1 log reduction. Combination therapy had no activity against the two isolates with amikacin MIC ≥ 2048 mg/L.

CONCLUSIONS

Inhaled amikacin monotherapy showed bactericidal activity against most isolates tested with amikacin MICs ≤ 256 mg/L. Adjunct inhaled amikacin plus meropenem sustained this activity for 72 h for the tested isolates with amikacin/meropenem MIC ≤ 64/32 mg/L.

A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled dose-escalation phase 1 study of aerosolized amikacin and fosfomycin delivered via the PARI investigational eFlow® inline nebulizer system in mechanically ventilated patients

BACKGROUND

This clinical trial evaluated the pharmacokinetics and safety/tolerability of amikacin/fosfomycin solution using a vibrating plate nebulizer, in mechanically ventilated patients with ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis (VAT) or ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).

METHODS

Nine adult patients were consented to receive three escalating doses of a combination of 50 mg/mL amikacin and 20 mg/mL fosfomycin; doses were separated by 24±2 hr. On day 3, patients received two blinded, randomized treatments (amikacin/fosfomycin and volume-matched placebo), separated by 2 hr. All treatments were administered with a single-patient, multitreatment nebulizer (Investigational eFlow(®) Inline Nebulizer System; PARI Pharma GmbH, positioned in the inspiratory limb tubing between the ventilator and the patient. The nebulizer remained in-line until all treatments had been delivered. Concentrations of amikacin and fosfomycin were measured in tracheal aspirate and plasma samples obtained during the 24 hr after each dose.

RESULTS

Fifteen minutes after dosing with the 300/120 mg amikacin/fosfomycin combination, tracheal aspirate amikacin concentrations±SD were 12,390±3,986 μg/g, and fosfomycin concentrations were 6,174±2,548 μg/g (n=6). Airway clearance was rapid. Plasma concentrations were subtherapeutic; the highest observed amikacin plasma concentration was 1.4 μg/mL, and the highest observed fosfomycin plasma concentration was 0.8 μg/mL. Administration time was approximately 2 min/mL. No adverse effects on respiratory rate, peak airway pressures, or oxygenation were observed during or following drug or placebo administration.

CONCLUSIONS

High tracheal aspirate concentrations of amikacin and fosfomycin were achieved in mechanically ventilated patients with VAT or VAP after aerosolized administration with an inline nebulizer system. Airway clearance was rapid. No adverse respiratory effects were noted during or following drug administration.

Ventilator-associated infection: the role for inhaled antibiotics

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite multiple protocols for the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), respiratory infections have not been eliminated in the ICU. The profound disruption in both airway integrity and mucociliary clearance caused by the endotracheal tube makes it unlikely there will ever be a zero rate of respiratory infection in critically ill ventilated patients or a 100% cure rate when infection is present. In fact, options for treatment are diminishing as bacteria resistant to most, or in some hospitals all, systemic antibiotics increase in prevalence from our liberal use of systemic antibiotics. Inhaled therapy with proper delivery will result in the high concentrations of antibiotics needed in the treatment of increasingly resistant organisms.

RECENT FINDINGS

Data from many recent investigations have focused on inhaled antibiotics as: adjunctive therapy to systemic antibiotic for VAP, monotherapy for VAP, and as monotherapy for ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis. The clinical outcomes of these studies will be reviewed as well as their effect on multidrug-resistant organisms.

SUMMARY

The present review will focus on the rationale for inhaled therapy, the current studies examining the delivery and clinical efficacy of inhaled antibiotics, and the potential role for this mode of delivery actually decreasing antibiotic resistance in the respiratory tract.

Antibiotic therapy for ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis: a standard of care to reduce pneumonia, morbidity and costs?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The present review draws our attention to ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis (VAT) as a distinct clinical entity that has been associated with progression to ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and worse patient outcomes. In contrast to VAP, which has been extensively investigated for over the past 30 years, most VAT studies have been conducted in the past decade. There are ample data which demonstrate that VAT may progress to VAP, have more ventilator days, and have longer ICU stay that may translate into higher healthcare costs.

RECENT FINDINGS

The article focuses on the diagnostic criteria for VAT, causative agents, and studies analyzing associations between VAT and patient outcomes in relation to early, appropriate intravenous, and/or aerosolized antibiotic therapy. Aerosolized antibiotic treatment delivered by improved device technology is a novel approach that has proved to be effective for the treatment and eradication of multidrug-resistant bacterial pathogens. Aerosolized antibiotics are effective in decreasing the use of systemic antibiotics, reducing bacterial resistance, and may also facilitate clinical resolution of infection.

SUMMARY

Evidence presented in this review supports treatment of VAT with early and appropriate antibiotic therapy as a standard of care to reduce VAP, ventilator days, and duration of ICU stay in high-risk patient population.

Antibiotic treatment of ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis: to treat or not to treat?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To evaluate the data on antimicrobial therapy for ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis (VAT) to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), and its impact on patient outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Mechanically ventilated patients are at increased risk for tracheal colonization with bacterial pathogens that may progress to VAT and/or VAP. Previous studies suggest that 10-30% of patients with VAT progress to VAP, which results in increased morbidity but not mortality. Several natural history studies and small randomized controlled trials and a meta-analysis reported that appropriate, pre-emptive antibiotic treatment for VAT reduces VAP, duration of intubation and length of ICU stay.

SUMMARY

This review focuses on diagnostic criteria for VAT and VAP, etiologic agents, rationale and benefits of initiating pre-emptive, appropriate antibiotic treatment for VAT to prevent VAP, improve patient outcomes and associated acute and chronic healthcare costs.

Nebulizers for drug delivery to the lungs

INTRODUCTION

Nebulizers are the oldest modern method of delivering aerosols to the lungs for the purpose of respiratory drug delivery. While use of nebulizers remains widespread in the hospital and home setting, certain newer nebulization technologies have enabled more portable use. Varied fundamental processes of droplet formation and breakup are used in modern nebulizers, and these processes impact device performance and suitability for nebulization of various formulations.

AREAS COVERED

This review first describes basic aspects of nebulization technologies, including jet nebulizers, various high-frequency vibration techniques, and the use of colliding liquid jets. Nebulizer use in hospital and home settings is discussed next. Complications in aerosol droplet size measurement owing to the changes in nebulized droplet diameters due to evaporation or condensation are discussed, as is nebulization during mechanical ventilation.

EXPERT OPINION

While the limelight may often appear to be focused on other delivery devices, such as pressurized metered dose and dry powder inhalers, the ease of formulating many drugs in water and delivering them as aqueous aerosols ensures that nebulizers will remain as a viable and relevant method of respiratory drug delivery. This is particularly true given recent improvements in nebulizer droplet production technology.

Ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis: pre-emptive, appropriate antibiotic therapy recommended

Nseir and colleagues presented data from a large multicenter study of patients with ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis (VAT), demonstrating that appropriate antibiotic therapy for VAT was an independent predictor for reducing transition to pneumonia (ventilator-associated pneumonia, or VAP). These data added to the growing evidence supporting the use of appropriate antibiotic therapy for VAT as a standard of care to prevent VAP and improve patient outcomes.

Aerosolized antibiotics: do they add to the treatment of pneumonia?

Purpose of review

The increasing rate of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) caused by multidrug-resistant pathogens warrants the development of new treatment strategies. Carefully engineered delivery systems are undergoing evaluation to test the hypothesis that aerosolized administration of antibiotics will provide high local concentrations and fast clearance, which in turn may improve efficacy and decrease the risk of microbial resistance.

Recent findings

Recent studies indicate that aerosolized delivery systems for specially formulated antibiotics yield high local concentrations with rapid clearance and low systemic exposure. Preliminary clinical studies reveal that aerosolized delivery of antibiotics is well tolerated and active, when combined with intravenous antibiotics. No single aerosolized antibiotic is likely to provide broad-spectrum activity against both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria.

Summary

Large multicenter trials are needed to determine whether preliminary findings will translate to improved clinical activity and decreased microbial resistance in VAP patients, and to optimize the use of aerosolized antibiotics.

Antibacterial efficacy of inhaled squalamine in a rat model of chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia

OBJECTIVES

Squalamine is a steroid extracted from sharks with proven in vitro antibacterial activity. We assessed its efficacy in reducing the lung bacterial load and histological lesions when given via inhalation in a rat model of chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia.

METHODS

Sprague-Dawley rats were inoculated by tracheal intubation with 150 μL of a solution containing 10(8) cfu/mL of agar bead-embedded P. aeruginosa strain PAO1. MICs of squalamine and colistin for this strain were 2-8 and 0.5-1 mg/L, respectively. Starting the day after infection, the animals were treated twice daily with aerosolized squalamine (3 mg), colistin (160 mg) or 0.9% saline for 6 days. The bacterial load and lung histological lesions were evaluated on the seventh day.

RESULTS

Aerosols of squalamine and colistin resulted in a significant reduction in median (IQR) pulmonary bacterial count compared with saline [10(3) (6 × 10(2)-2 × 10(3)), 10(3) (9 × 10(2)-6 × 10(3)) and 10(5) (9 × 10(4)-2 × 10(5)) cfu/lung, respectively; P < 0.001 for both treated groups versus saline]. The lung weight and the lung histological severity score were significantly lower in both treated groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In a model of chronic P. aeruginosa pneumonia, treatment twice daily with a squalamine aerosol for 6 days leads to a significant reduction in the pulmonary bacterial count and pneumonia lesions with an efficacy comparable to that of colistin.