High Sustained Virologic Response to Daclatasvir Plus Asunaprevir in Elderly and Cirrhotic Patients with Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1b Without Baseline NS5A Polymorphisms

Safety and effectiveness of direct-acting antivirals in patients with chronic hepatitis C and chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND/AIMS

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of direct acting antivirals (DAAs) available in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in Korea.

METHODS

In a retrospective, multicenter cohort study, 362 patients were enrolled from 2015 to 2019. The effectiveness and safety of DAAs including glecaprevir/pibrentasvir, sofosubvir/ribavirin, ledipasvir/sofosbuvir, and daclatasvir/asunaprevir were analyzed for patients according to CKD stage. We evaluated sustained virologic response at week 12 after treatment (SVR12) as primary endpoint. The effectiveness and safety were also evaluated according to CKD stage.

RESULTS

Among 362 patients, 307 patients completed DAAs treatment and follow-up period after end of treatment. The subjects comprised 87 patients (62 with CKD stage 3 and 25 with CKD stage (4-5), of whom 22 were undergoing hemodialysis). HCV patients with CKD stage 1 and 2 (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) showed SVR12 of 97.2% and 95.4% respectively. SVR12 of CKD stage 3 and 4-5 (eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) patients was 91.9% and 91.6% respectively. Patients undergoing hemodialysis achieved SVR12 (90.9%). Treatment failure of DAAs in stage 1, 2, 3, and 4-5 was 2.8%, 2.7%, 1.6%, and 4%. DAAs showed good safety profile and did not affect deterioration of renal function.

CONCLUSION

DAAs shows comparable SVR12 and safety in CKD patients (stage 3, 4, and 5) with HCV compared with patients with stage 1 and 2. The effectiveness and safety of DAAs may be related to the treatment duration. Therefore, it is important to select adequate regimens of DAAs and to increase treatment adherence.

2020 Taiwan consensus statement on the management of hepatitis C: part (I) general population

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection remains a major public health issue with high prevalence in Taiwan. Recently, the advent of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) agents, with higher efficacy, excellent safety profile, and truncated treatment duration, has revolutionized the paradigm of hepatitis C treatment and made HCV elimination possible. To provide timely guidance for optimal hepatitis C management, the Taiwan Association for the Study of the Liver (TASL) established an expert panel to publish a 2-part consensus statement on the management of hepatitis C in the DAA era. After comprehensive literature review and a consensus meeting, patient-oriented, genotype-guided recommendations on hepatitis C treatment for the general and special populations have been provided based on the latest indications and scientific evidence. In the first part of this consensus, we present the epidemiology and treatment situation of hepatitis C in Taiwan, the development of DAA, pre-treatment evaluation, post sustained virologic response (SVR) monitoring, and most importantly the treatment recommendations for the general population with compensated liver disease. The second part will focus on the treatment recommendations for the special populations.

Real-life effectiveness and safety of the daclatasvir/asunaprevir combination therapy for genotype 1b chronic hepatitis C patients: An emphasis on the pretreatment NS5A resistance-associated substitution test

This study aimed to investigate the real-life effectiveness and safety of daclatasvir (DCV) and asunaprevir (ASV) combination therapy in Korean patients. We consecutively enrolled patients with genotype 1b hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection treated with at least one dose of DCV/ASV combination therapy in seven tertiary hospitals of South Korea. The sustained virologic response (SVR) rates and safety according to intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses were evaluated. Among the 526 enrolled patients, 91% showed negative (87%) or "undetermined" (4%) resistance-associated substitution (RAS); 9% did not undergo RAS testing. The SVR rates for ITT and PP were 89.3% and 95.0% in treatment-naive patients and 93.2% and 95.6% in treatment-experienced patients, respectively. In PP analysis, negative RAS was associated with higher SVR (96.3%) than with "undetermined RAS" (85.7%) or "not tested for RAS" (84.4%). Adverse events were reported in 185 (35.4%) patients, and events leading to discontinuation were observed in 4.3% of the study population. Forty-two (8.0%) patients developed transaminase elevation (≥2 × upper normal limit), resulting in treatment discontinuation in six (1.1%) patients. DCV/ASV combination therapy showed acceptable efficacy in genotype 1b compensated HCV-infected patients with negative pretreatment RAS. Although most adverse events were tolerable to continue antiviral treatment, adequate monitoring for transaminase elevation is warranted.

Effect of CYP3A5*3 genetic variant on the metabolism of direct-acting antivirals in vitro: a different effect on asunaprevir versus daclatasvir and beclabuvir

Direct-acting antivirals, asunaprevir (ASV), daclatasvir (DCV), and beclabuvir (BCV) are known to be mainly metabolized by CYP3A enzymes; however, the differences in the detailed metabolic activities of CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 on these drugs are not well clarified. The aim of the present study was to elucidate the relative contributions of CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 to the metabolism of ASV, DCV, and BCV, as well as the effect of CYP3A5*3 genetic variant in vitro. The amount of each drug and their major metabolites were determined using LC-MS/MS. Recombinant CYP3As and CYP3A5*3-genotyped human liver microsomes (CYP3A5 expressers or non-expressers) were used for the determination of their metabolic activities. The contribution of CYP3A5 to ASV metabolism was considerable compared to that of CYP3A4. Consistently, ASV metabolic activity in CYP3A5 expressers was higher than those in CYP3A5 non-expresser. Moreover, CYP3A5 expression level was significantly correlated with ASV metabolism. In contrast, these observations were not found in DCV and BCV metabolism. To our knowledge, this is the first study to directly demonstrate the effect of CYP3A5*3 genetic variants on the metabolism of ASV. The findings of the present study may provide basic information on ASV, DCV, and BCV metabolisms.

Developments in the treatment of HCV genotype 3 infection

Introduction: Unlike other hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes (GTs), patients infected with GT3 are associated with an increased risk of accelerated liver disease progression. Although early immuno-modulator therapies yielded moderate sustained virologic response (SVR) rates, treatment of GT3 patients has proven more challenging in the era of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). Areas covered: The review provides an overview of the evolution of therapies against GT3 since the approval of the first immunomodulatory agent nearly 30 years ago. Expert opinion: A greater choice of treatment options is now available for HCV GT3-infected patients. In treatment-naïve patients with or without compensated cirrhosis, SVR rates are comparably high approaching 100% irrespective of treatment option. For treatment-experienced patients, choosing the right therapy is important, especially for those with advanced liver disease. For the few patients who fail with multiple persistent highly resistant DAA substitutions, retreatment options are limited. Additional real-world treatment comparisons are required to confirm differences in SVR in these more difficult-to-treat patients. This also includes patients infected with GT3 subtypes such as GT3b where multiple DAA-resistant substitutions occur naturally. In the absence of new drugs with non-overlapping drug-resistant profiles, an interferon-based therapy may still be beneficial in select patient populations with high-level multiple DAA-resistant substitutions.

Pooled analysis of HCV genotype 1 resistance-associated substitutions in NS5A, NS3 and NS5B pre-and post-treatment with 12 weeks of daclatasvir, asunaprevir and beclabuvir

BACKGROUND

Daclatasvir (DCV; non-structural [NS]5A inhibitor) plus asunaprevir (ASV; NS3 inhibitor) plus beclabuvir (BCV; non-nucleoside NS5B inhibitor) is an approved regimen for hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype (GT)-1 treatment in Japan. A comprehensive analysis of pre-treatment and treatment-emergent HCV resistance to this regimen ± ribavirin (RBV) was performed.

METHODS

Data were pooled from five Phase 2/3 studies of DCV+ASV+BCV±RBV given for 12 weeks to GT-1a- or GT-1b-infected patients. The prevalence and impact of pre-treatment resistance-associated substitutions (RAS) in NS5A, NS3, and NS5B on sustained virological response (SVR) was assessed, as were emergent RAS and their post-treatment persistence.

RESULTS

Baseline NS5A RAS (GT-1a: M28T, Q30H/L/R/S, L31M, Y93C/H; GT-1b: L31I/M, Y93C/H) were present in 5% (26/561) of GT-1a and 16% (85/537) of GT-1b sequences. SVR12 for GT-1b without RBV was 100% (82/82) with RAS and >99% (427/428) without RAS. For GT-1a, SVR12 without RAS was 97% (85/88) with RBV and 92% (410/447) without RBV; SVR12 with RAS was 100% (2/2) with RBV and 54% (13/24) without RBV. Baseline NS3 (at R155 or D168) and NS5B (at P495) RAS were rare (≤1%). Treatment-emergent NS5A RAS (mostly Q30E/H/K/R±Y93H/N) in GT-1a persisted 60 weeks post-treatment, while NS3 RAS (mostly R155K) and NS5B-P495L/S were no longer detected after 48 or 24 weeks, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

DCV+ASV+BCV±RBV was highly efficacious in HCV GT-1 infection, including HCV GT-1b with NS5A RAS. The fitness of treatment-emergent RAS post-treatment was NS5A > NS3 > NS5B; NS3 and NS5B RAS were generally replaced by wild-type sequence within 48 weeks.

Comparison of the Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes between Leprosy-Affected Persons in Sorokdo and the General Population Affected by Chronic Hepatitis C in Korea

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Patients with Hansen's disease are the most vulnerable to hepatitis C. However, no data on the treatment efficacy of direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) are available in this group. Therefore, we elucidated the prevalence and clinical outcomes of hepatitis C in persons affected by leprosy in Sorokdo, Jeollanam-do, Korea.

METHODS

We retrospectively included 50 leprosy patients with positive hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA test results (group A) hospitalized at the Sorokdo National Hospital from May 2016 to March 2018 and 73 patients with chronic hepatitis C who were treated with DAAs at the Chonnam National University Hospital (group B) from May 2016 to December 2017.

RESULTS

Overall, at the Sorokdo National Hospital, positive HCV antibody and HCV RNA rates were 18.4% and 11.0%, respectively. The mean participant age was 76.5±7 years, and 58% of participants were men. The genotypes were type 1b in 44% (22 out of 50) and type 2 in 56% (28 out of 50). Sustained virologic response was achieved at a rate of 95.5% (21/22) in genotype 1b and 92.9% (26/28) in genotype 2 patients. Ribavirin-induced hemolytic anemia occurred in 57.1% (16/28) of patients with genotype 2. Among these, 28.5% (8/28) received blood transfusions.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment efficacy was not different between the leprosy-affected population and the general population. However, severe ribavirin-induced hemolytic anemia requiring transfusion was present in 28.5% of genotype 2 patients. Therefore, we suggest ribavirin-free DAAs for the treatment of genotype 2 hepatitis C in leprosy-affected persons in the future.

Management of HCV patients in cases of direct-acting antiviral failure

Introduction: Over 70 million people are infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV), increasing the risk of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Areas covered: Since the approval of the first interferon-free direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy in 2011, a number of DAAs have been approved, and HCV is now considered curable. Until recently, however, there were no clear guidelines on how to re-treat patients who fail DAA therapy. Current protease inhibitors (PIs) are generally unaffected by earlier resistance-associated variants (RAVs), but many NS5A inhibitors continue to have overlapping resistance profiles, and NS5A RAVs can persist even in the absence of DAAs. Expert opinion: Fortunately, RAVs affecting NS5B polymerase inhibitors are rare, making sofosbuvir a safe choice as the backbone of re-treatment therapies. Recent re-treatment guidelines that take into account genotype, fibrosis, treatment history, and RAV suggest that >90% of patients with prior treatment failures can be successfully re-treated with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir, sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir or glecaprevir/pibrentasvir.

[Efficacy and safety of narlaprevir/ritonavir and daclatasvir non interferon combination in population of Russian patients with chronic hepatitis C]

AIM

Evaluate efficacy and safety of a combination of direct - acting antivirals narlaprevir/ritonavir with daclatasvir in patients with viral hepatitis C.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study enrolled adult patients with HCV genotype 1b infection without demonstrated NS5A resistance - associated substitutions Y93C/H/N/S and/or L31F/M/V/I. Patients were treated with narlaprevir 200 mg QD, ritonavir 100 mg QD and daclatasvir 60 mg QD. Treatment duration was 12 weeks. Proportion of patients achieving sustained virological response 12 weeks after treatment (SVR12) was the primary efficacy endpoint.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

In total, 105 (75.0%) patients were treatment with the study combination. Patients' age varied from 21 to 69 years, the mean age being 43.2±10.9 years. There were slightly more women (55.2%), and 69 patients (65.7%) had comorbidities. SVR 12 was 89.5% (95% CI 82.0-94.7%). In 10 of 11 patients with treatment failures NS5A resistance - associated substitutions in residues 31 and/or 93 were found, as well as less clinically relevant substitutions L28M, P58S, R30Q, Q62K. Adverse events (AEs) were found in less than one half of patients (45 patients, or 42.9% in the safety population). Almost all recorded AEs were mild to moderate.

CONCLUSION

Efficacy of treatment with a combination of narlaprevir/ritonavir and daclatasvir in treatment - naïve patients with HCV genotype 1b was close to 90%. This combination was found to be safe and well - tolerated.

Clinical outcomes after the introduction of direct antiviral agents for patients infected with genotype 1b hepatitis C virus depending on the regimens: A multicenter study in Korea

BACKGROUND

A real-life study is essential outside clinical trials. The aim is to evaluate the clinical outcomes of direct acting agents (DAA) for patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) in real practice.

METHODS

We analyzed 590 consecutively enrolled patients with CHC-1b who received DAAs since 2015, when DAAs were introduced in Korea. The patients were checked for resistance-associated variants (RAV) against nonstructural protein 5A inhibitors and then daclatasvir/asunaprevir or sofosbuvir based regimens were chosen.

RESULTS

The frequency of patients with cirrhosis and prior hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was 29.2% and 4.7%, respectively. For the RAV test, 10% were positive and in 3.6% the result was "indeterminate." Overall, 518 patients were treated with a 24-week regimen of daclatasvir/asunaprevir, 72 patients (RAV positive 75%) were treated with 12 weeks regimen of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir or daclatasvir/sofosbuvir. The SVR12 was 94.0% in the daclatasvir/asunaprevir, 98.2% in the ledipasvir/sofosbuvir, and 100% in the daclatasvir/sofosbuvir group. A total of 93.3% of SVR12 in the RAV-"indeterminate" patients was not difference 95.0% in the RAV-negative patients. Up to 1 year, de novo HCC occurrence and recurrence developed in 2.6% and 17.8%, respectively. HCC was more frequent in cirrhotic patients than in noncirrhotic patients (P = 0.000). α Fetoprotein (AFP) level at the end of treatment was a predicting factor for de novo HCC.

CONCLUSIONS

Optimizing the choice of DAAs according to RAV test resulted in high SVR among CHC-1b Korean patients. This real practice multicenter cohort study suggests the importance of AFP and HCC surveillance in cirrhotic patients even after successful HCV therapy.

Impact of Preexisting Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 6 NS3, NS5A, and NS5B Polymorphisms on the In Vitro Potency of Direct-Acting Antiviral Agents

HCV genotype 6 (GT-6) is found predominantly in East and Southeast Asia. Clinical studies have focused on patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) GT-6a, where high sustained virologic response (SVR) rates to direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) have been achieved. However, GT-6 is highly diverse, with 29 reported subtypes. We explored the diversity of GT-6 polymorphisms at residues associated with DAA resistance, their impact on DAA in vitro potency when evaluated in a GT-6a consensus replicon, and their association with specific GT-6 subtypes. GT-6 sequences from 25 patient-derived samples and 105 sequences from the U.S. HCV database were compared, and substitutions at resistance-associated residue positions were phenotyped against different DAAs. Preexisting resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) to NS3 protease (A156V and D168E) and NS5B nucleotide (L159F and S282C) inhibitors were rare (<4%). Preexisting RASs to NS5A inhibitors were common, especially at L28 (A/F/G/M/T/V) and R30 (E/N/S). In vitro susceptibilities of NS5A-L28A and -L28T were dramatically reduced against all tested NS5A drugs (90% effective concentration [EC₉₀] range, 119 to 2,032 nM) compared with susceptibilities against a GT-6a consensus replicon (EC₉₀ range, 0.1 to 19 nM). These L28 RASs preexisted in combination with R30S (EC₉₀ [L28A-R30S] of ≥720 nM or EC₉₀ [L28T-R30S] of ≥128 nM against tested DAAs) or as L28T-L31I (EC₉₀ [tested DAAs] of >5,000 nM) and were detected in evaluated GT-6b and -6f sequences. NS5A-L28A-R30A, observed in GT-6r, did not replicate. In conclusion, HCV GT-6b, GT-6f, and GT-6r sequences harbored highly resistant RASs to all evaluated NS5A drugs. Therefore, monitoring SVR in patients infected with these GT-6 subtypes treated with NS5A drug-containing regimens is suggested to confirm any association between noted NS5A polymorphisms and treatment failure.

Efficacy and Safety of Daclatasvir and Asunaprevir in Patients with Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1b Infection on Hemodialysis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of daclatasvir (DCV) and asunaprevir (ASV) in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection on hemodialysis.

METHODS;

We performed a single-arm, multicenter prospective study. Twenty-one chronic hemodialysis patients with HCV infection were prospectively enrolled from February 2016 to April 2017. We evaluated the virological responses at weeks 4, 12, and 24 (end of treatment [EOT]) and the sustained virological response at 12 weeks after the EOT (SVR12). The tolerability and safety of the drugs were also assessed.

RESULTS

None of the 20 patients had the NS5A resistance-associated variant (NS5A RAV), and one patient was indeterminate for the NS5A RAV. Seventeen patients (80%) completed the 24 weeks of treatment with DCV and ASV. Four patients discontinued the study prior to week 12. In an intention-to-treat analysis, the SVR12 was 76.1%. In a per-protocol analysis, patients who completed DCV and ASV treatment achieved an SVR12 of 100%. DCV and ASV were well tolerated by the majority of patients. Three patients discontinued treatment due to adverse events (AEs) including dizziness, dyspnea, and neutropenia. The patient with indeterminate NS5A RAV showed viral breakthrough and discontinued treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

DCV and ASV combination therapy in chronic hemodialysis patients with HCV infection achieved a high SVR12 rate with few AEs. To maximize the SVR12 rate, it is important to identify candidates by baseline RAV testing. Close monitoring of the safety and tolerability of DCV and ASV may be necessary in HCV-infected patients on hemodialysis. (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT02580474).

Efficacy and safety of 12 weeks of daclatasvir, asunaprevir plus ribavirin for HCV genotype-1b infection without NS5A resistance-associated substitutions

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Treatment with daclatasvir plus asunaprevir (DCV + ASV) for 24 weeks provided a sustained virologic response (SVR) rate of over 90% in hepatitis C virus genotype 1b (HCV-1b) infected patients without non-structural 5A (NS5A) resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) at the L31 and Y93 sites. In this study, we investigated whether adding ribavirin to the DCV + ASV combination could shorten the original treatment regimen to 12 weeks without compromising the treatment efficacy for HCV-1b patients without NS5A RASs.

METHODS

In the prospective, open-label, single-arm, nationwide multi-center phase III study, a total of 70 interferon-naïve or interferon-experienced HCV-1b patients without baseline L31/Y93 RASs received daclatasvir (60 mg/day) and asunaprevir (100 mg twice daily) plus weight-based ribavirin (1000-1200 mg/day) for 12 weeks, with a 12-week post-treatment follow-up. The primary end-point was the rate of undetectable HCV RNA 12 weeks post-treatment (SVR12).

RESULTS

The SVR12 rate was 97.1% (68/70) and 100% (68/68) in the full-analysis-set and the per-protocol population, respectively. None of the 68 patients who completed the 12-week treatment experienced relapse during post-treatment follow-up. Two patients withdrew from the study at treatment days 21 and 34 due to anorexia and fatigue, which were considered ribavirin-related and resolved post medication cessation. A total of 4 serious adverse events were reported and considered treatment-unrelated. No deaths or grade 4 adverse events requiring hospitalization was observed throughout the study.

CONCLUSION

Truncated regimen of DCV + ASV plus ribavirin for 12 weeks was highly effective and safe in HCV-1b patients without NS5A L31/Y93 RAS.

The Discovery and Early Clinical Evaluation of the HCV NS3/4A Protease Inhibitor Asunaprevir (BMS-650032)

The discovery of asunaprevir (1) began with the concept of engaging the small and well-defined S₁’ pocket of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS3/4A protease that was explored in the context of tripeptide carboxylic acid-based inhibitors. A cyclopropyl-acyl sulfonamide moiety was found to be the optimal element at the P₁-P₁’ interface enhancing the potency of carboxylic acid-based prototypes by 10- to >100-fold, dependent upon the specific background. Optimization for oral bioavailability identified a 1-substituted isoquinoline-based P₂* element that conferred a significant exposure advantage in rats compared to the matched 4-substituted quinoline isomer. BMS-605339 (30) was the first cyclopropyl-acyl sulfonamide derivative advanced into clinical trials that demonstrated dose-related reductions in plasma viral RNA in HCV-infected patients. However, 30 was associated with cardiac events observed in a normal healthy volunteer (NHV) and an HCV-infected patient that led to the suspension of the development program. Using a Langendorff rabbit heart model, a limited structure-cardiac liability relationship was quickly established that led to the discovery of 1. This compound, which differs from 30 only by changes in the substitution pattern of the P₂* isoquinoline heterocycle and the addition of a single chlorine atom to the molecular formula, gave a dose-dependent reduction in plasma viral RNA following oral administration to HCV-infected patients without the burden of the cardiac events that had been observed with 30. A small clinical trial of the combination of 1 with the HCV NS5A inhibitor daclatasvir (2) established for the first time that a chronic genotype 1 (GT-1) HCV infection could be cured by therapy with two direct-acting antiviral agents in the absence of exogenous immune-stimulating agents. Development of the combination of 1 and 2 was initially focused on Japan where the patient population is predominantly infected with GT-1b virus, culminating in marketing approval which was granted on July 4, 2014. In order to broaden therapy to include GT-1a infections, a fixed dose triple combination of 1, 2, and the allosteric NS5B inhibitor beclabuvir (3) was developed, approved by the Japanese health authorities for the treatment of HCV GT-1 infection on December 20, 2016 and marketed as Ximency^®.

Safety Exposure-Response Analysis for Daclatasvir, Asunaprevir, and Beclabuvir Combinations in HCV-Infected Subjects

The combination regimen of daclatasvir, asunaprevir, and beclabuvir has been developed for the treatment of hepatitis C virus infection. The objectives of this analysis were to characterize the relationship between the exposures of the daclatasvir, asunaprevir, and beclabuvir regimen and liver‐related laboratory elevations (Grade 3 or 4 alanine aminotransferase [ALT] and total bilirubin [Tbili]), and to evaluate the impact of selected covariates on the exposure‐response relationships. The exposure‐response analysis was performed with data from 1 phase 2 and 3 phase 3 studies in hepatitis C virus–infected subjects. The probability of liver‐related laboratory elevations were modeled using linear logistic regression. Selected covariates were tested using a forward‐addition and backward‐elimination approach. The final model for ALT elevation included Asian race, body weight in non‐Asian subjects, and asunaprevir exposure. The final model for Tbili elevation included Asian race, fibrosis score (F0‐F3 or F4) and asupanprevir exposure. Asian subjects had greater the Grade 3 or 4 ALT and Tbili elevation rates than non‐Asians. The Grade 3 or 4 ALT elevation rate increased with decreasing body weight in non‐Asian subjects. Subjects with F4 fibrosis score had a higher rate of Grade 3 or 4 Tbili elevation compared to subjects with F0 to F3 fibrosis score. Higher asunaprevir exposure was associated with increases in Grade 3 or 4 ALT and Tbili elevation rates; however, the impact on the ALT elevation was not clinically relevant and the effect on Tbili elevation was smaller than the other significant covariates.

Potent viral suppression and improvements in alpha-fetoprotein and measures of fibrosis in Japanese patients receiving a daclatasvir/asunaprevir/beclabuvir fixed-dose combination for the treatment of HCV genotype-1 infection

BACKGROUND

In the UNITY-3 study, 96% sustained virologic response (SVR12) rate was observed in Japanese patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype (GT)-1 infection treated for 12 weeks with fixed-dose daclatasvir, asunaprevir, and beclabuvir (DCV-TRIO). As HCV clearance may improve liver outcomes, we assessed hepatic fibrosis and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), a hepatocellular carcinoma risk marker, pre- and post-treatment in UNITY-3.

METHODS

Treatment-naive or interferon-experienced UNITY-3 patients with HCV GT-1 who received twice-daily DCV-TRIO were assessed for fibrosis [FibroTest; FibroScan; fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4), aspartate-aminotransferase-to-platelet-ratio index] and AFP at baseline and Weeks 4 (FIB-4 only), 12 or 24 post-treatment.

RESULTS

Of 217 patients, 99% had GT-1b infection, 46% were aged > 65 years, 21% had compensated cirrhosis, and 26% baseline HCV-RNA > 10⁷ IU/mL. All GT-1b patients treated ≥ 4 weeks achieved SVR12 with (n = 54) or without (n = 144) baseline NS5A polymorphisms associated with DCV resistance (positions 28/30/31/93). Statistically significant post-treatment reductions from baseline were observed for all fibrosis measures and AFP, with numerically greater reductions in cirrhotic patients. FibroTest category improved in 44%, remained stable in 50%, and worsened in 6% of patients; 98% with baseline AFP < 6 μg/L remained < 6 μg/L and 51% with baseline AFP ≥ 6 μg/L were < 6 μg/L post-treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

DCV-TRIO administered for 12 weeks to Japanese patients with primarily GT-1b infection achieved a high SVR12 rate and resulted in improved measures of hepatic fibrosis and serum AFP that may reduce the risk of future liver disease progression and hepatocellular carcinoma, particularly in those with compensated cirrhosis.

Recent update of the 2017 Korean Association for the Study of the Liver (KASL) treatment guidelines of chronic hepatitis C: Comparison of guidelines from other continents, 2017 AASLD/IDSA and 2016 EASL

The paradigm for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) has been changed due to the development of direct acting antivirals (DAAs) of hepatitis C virus (HCV). The high sustained virologic response rate and ease of administration makes the DAAs approach ideal to contribute to the complete eradication of HCV. Currently, treatment options for individual patients vary depending on the genotype or subtype of HCV, presence or absence of liver cirrhosis, previous experience of antiviral treatment or resistance associated substitutions. Because of drug avalilability, cost-effectiveness, preference, compliance and greater possibility of desirable effects and presumed patient-important outcomes may vary between countries, treatment options for individual patients are different. The review focuses on the comparing the current treatment options for CHC in other continents with the 2017 Korea Association for the Study of the Liver guidelines.

Daclatasvir plus asunaprevir in treatment-naïve patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1b infection

AIM

To assess daclatasvir plus asunaprevir (DUAL) in treatment-naïve patients from mainland China, Russia and South Korea with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1b infection.

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned (3:1) to receive 24 wk of treatment with DUAL (daclatasvir 60 mg once daily and asunaprevir 100 mg twice daily) beginning on day 1 of the treatment period (immediate treatment arm) or following 12 wk of matching placebo (placebo-deferred treatment arm). The primary endpoint was a comparison of sustained virologic response at posttreatment week 12 (SVR12) compared with the historical SVR rate for peg-interferon plus ribavirin (70%) among patients in the immediate treatment arm. The first 12 wk of the study were blinded. Safety was assessed in DUAL-treated patients compared with placebo patients during the first 12 wk (double-blind phase), and during 24 wk of DUAL in both arms combined.

RESULTS

In total, 207 patients were randomly assigned to immediate (n = 155) or placebo-deferred (n = 52) treatment. Most patients were Asian (86%), female (59%) and aged < 65 years (90%). Among them, 13% had cirrhosis, 32% had IL28B non-CC genotypes and 53% had baseline HCV RNA levels of ≥ 6 million IU/mL. Among patients in the immediate treatment arm, SVR12 was achieved by 92% (95% confidence interval: 87.2-96.0), which was significantly higher than the historical comparator rate (70%). SVR12 was largely unaffected by cirrhosis (89%), age ≥ 65 years (92%), male sex (90%), baseline HCV RNA ≥ 6 million (89%) or IL28B non-CC genotypes (96%), although SVR12 was higher among patients without (96%) than among those with (53%) baseline NS5A resistance-associated polymorphisms (at L31 or Y93H). During the double-blind phase, aminotransferase elevations were more common among placebo recipients than among patients receiving DUAL. During 24 wk of DUAL therapy (combined arms), the most common adverse events (≥ 10%) were elevated alanine aminotransferase and upper respiratory tract infection; emergent grade 3-4 laboratory abnormalities were infrequently observed, and all grade 3-4 aminotransferase abnormalities (alanine aminotransferase, n = 9; aspartate transaminase, n = 6) reversed within 8-11 d. Two patients discontinued DUAL treatment; one due to aminotransferase elevations, nausea, and jaundice and the other due to a fatal adverse event unrelated to treatment. There were no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSION

DUAL was well-tolerated during this phase 3 study, and SVR12 with DUAL treatment (92%) exceeded the historical SVR rate for peg-interferon plus ribavirin of 70%.

Usefulness of semiquantitative PCR-Invader assay for selecting candidates for daclatasvir plus asunaprevir combination therapy among patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1b

AIMS

PCR-Invader is a highly sensitive assay for detecting non-structural protein 5A (NS5A) resistance-associated variants (RAVs) of hepatitis C virus (HCV). Here, we validated the accuracy of the semiquantitative PCR-Invader (SQ-PI) assay compared to direct sequencing (DS) for identifying NS5A RAVs, and we evaluated the treatment efficacy of daclatasvir plus asunaprevir (DCV + ASV) for patients judged to be non-positive for NS5A RAVs by SQ-PI.

METHODS

Detection rates of NS5A RAVs by SQ-PI and DS were compared for 204 patients with HCV genotype 1b. Patients with non-positive results for NS5A RAVs by SQ-PI were treated by DCV + ASV, and the efficacy of this treatment was examined.

RESULTS

All samples judged as negative for NS5A RAVs by SQ-PI were similarly judged by DS. However, 29.7% of samples judged as negative for Y93H by DS were judged as weakly positive or positive by SQ-PI. Among 108 patients who were judged as negative by SQ-PI and treated by DCV + ASV, rates of sustained virologic response at 24 weeks (SVR24) were 96.3% in intention-to-treat analysis and 99.0% in patients who completed treatment. Among patients who were weakly positive for Y93H on SQ-PI, the SVR24 rate was 95.0% (19/20). This rate was 100% (78/78) in patients who were negative for Y93H on SQ-PI and completed treatment.

CONCLUSION

Treatment efficacy of DCV + ASV was extremely high among patients who were non-positive for NS5A RAVs on SQ-PI, especially for patients with negative results.

Beclabuvir in combination with asunaprevir and daclatasvir for hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Daclatasvir, asunaprevir (ASV), and beclabuvir (BCV) are direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) for patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the efficacy and safety of this three-drug combination in HCV genotype 1 infection. Eleven electronic search engines were searched for relevant publications. Studies were screened for eligibility and data was extracted. The outcomes were pooled as event rate and risk ratio (RR). The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42017054391). Among the included six studies, five studies were included for the meta-analysis (n = 1261). The three-drug combination showed a high response rate in naïve patients with sustained virologic response at week-12 posttreatment (SVR₁₂ ) rate = 95.7% (95%CI [93.8-97.1]) and no difference detected by adding ribavirin (RBV) (the pooled RR = 0.98, 95%CI [0.90-1.08], P = 0.70) or comparing with interferon-experienced patients (RR = 1.02, 95%CI [0.98-1.07], P = 0.31) regardless the genotype 1 subtypes or IL28B genotype. Treatment failure was minimal and showed no difference regarding the previous comparisons. Increasing the dose or the duration did not show a significant increase in the efficacy. In conclusion, this analysis showed high response rates in HCV genotype 1-infected patients treated with daclatasvir, ASV, and BCV irrespective of RBV use, prior interferon-based therapy, or restriction on non-cirrhotic patients, IL28B genotype, or baseline resistance-associated variants.

[Revealing the characteristics of antiviral agents]

Rapid development of novel anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) agents in recent years has greatly improved treatment outcomes. However, such rapid progress in anti-HCV treatment has not allowed us to fully argue the different characteristics of each anti-HCV agent, optimal multidrug combinations, and the selection of treatment enabling to efficiently eliminate drug resistant viruses. We here quantified the intrinsic antiviral effect of 15 anti-HCV agents either clinically available or under developmental phase using a cell culture system, and identified the parameters that represent the antiviral profile of drugs through mathematical analysis. A computer simulation that calculated the antiviral activity and the frequency of mutation rate under dual- and triple-multidrug treatment presented the argument for the advantage of multidrug treatments. In this review, we summarize the novel approaches to evaluate intrinsic antiviral efficacy of drugs by combining the virological and mathematical analyses.

Daclatasvir/asunaprevir/beclabuvir, all-oral, fixed-dose combination for patients with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1

BACKGROUND AND AIM

This multinational (Taiwan, South Korea, Russia) phase 3 study evaluated the all-oral, ribavirin-free, fixed-dose combination (DCV-TRIO) of daclatasvir (NS5A inhibitor) 30 mg, asunaprevir (NS3 inhibitor) 200 mg, and beclabuvir (NS5B inhibitor) 75 mg, in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype-1 infection, with or without compensated cirrhosis.

METHODS

UNITY-4 (NCT02170727) was an open-label, two-cohort study in which 169 patients, treatment-naive (n = 138) or treatment-experienced (n = 31), received twice-daily DCV-TRIO for 12 weeks with 24 weeks of post-treatment follow-up. The primary efficacy end point was sustained virologic response at post-treatment week 12 (SVR12) in treatment-naive patients.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight (52%) patients were men, 81 (48%) Taiwanese, 78 (46%) Korean, and 10 (6%) Russian; 23 (14%) had compensated cirrhosis, and 52 (31%) were IL28B (rs1297860) non-CC genotype. Baseline resistance-associated NS5A polymorphisms (L31 and/or Y93) were detected in 25/165 (15%) patients with available genotype-1 sequencing data. SVR12 was achieved by 98.6% (136/138; 95% confidence interval: 94.9-99.8%) of treatment-naive and 100% (31/31; 95% confidence interval: 88.8-100%) of treatment-experienced patients. Both virologic failures were found to be infected with hepatitis C virus genotype-6g; 100% SVR12 was observed for genotype-1a (n = 8) and genotype-1b (n = 157). Two patients experienced serious adverse events. Eight (5%) patients experienced reversible grade 3/4 alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase elevations, leading to discontinuation in four (2%); all achieved SVR12. There were no grade 3/4 total bilirubin increases and no deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

Twelve weeks of DCV-TRIO was well tolerated and provided 100% SVR12 in treatment-naive and treatment-experienced patients with genotype-1 infection, with or without cirrhosis, including those with baseline NS5A-L31 or NS5A-Y93 resistance-associated substitutions.

Peginterferon alfa-2a for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in the era of direct-acting antivirals

BACKGROUND

The availability of novel direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) represents a new era of curative hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment, with over 95% of patients infected with HCV genotype 1 achieving sustained virological response (SVR). Nevertheless, the majority of patients globally are unable to access these treatments because of cost and infrastructure constraints and, thus, remain untreated and uncured.

DATA SOURCE

Relevant articles of peginterferon (PegIFN)-based treatments in HCV and sofosbuvir-based treatments, simeprevir, daclatasvir/asunaprevir, ritonavir-boosted paritaprevir/ombitasvir/dasabuvir, and grazoprevir/elbasvir, were searched in PubMed database, including general population and special population.

RESULTS

PegIFN in combination with ribavirin remains an important and relevant option for some patients, achieving SVR rates of up to 79% in genotype 1 and 89% in genotype 2 or 3 infections, which increases for patients with favorable IL28B genotypes. Triple therapy of DAA plus PegIFN/ribavirin is effective in treating difficult-to-cure patients infected with HCV genotype 3 or with resistance-associated variants. Owing to its long history in HCV management, the efficacy, tolerability and long-term outcomes associated with PegIFN alfa-2a are well established and have been validated in large-scale studies and in clinical practice for many populations. Furthermore, emerging data show that IFN-induced SVR is associated with lower incidences of hepatocellular carcinoma compared with DAAs. On the contrary, novel DAAs have yet to be studied in special populations, and long-term outcomes, particularly tumor development and recurrence in patients with cirrhosis and/or hepatocellular carcinoma, and reactivation of HBV in dually infected patients, are still unclear.

CONCLUSION

In this interferon-free era, PegIFN-based regimens remain a safe and effective option for selected HCV patients.

Direct Acting Antiviral Agents in Korean Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C and Hemophilia Who Are Treatment-Naïve or Treatment-Experienced

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Chronic hepatitis C (CHC) is a major comorbidity in patients with hemophilia.

METHODS

Patients (n=30) were enrolled between September 2015 and April 2016. Twenty-six patients were genotype 1 (1b, n=21; 1a, n=5) and four patients were genotype 2a/2b. Among 21 patients with genotype 1b, Y93H resistance-associated variants (RAVs) were detected in three patients (14.3%). We evaluated sustained virologic response (SVRs) at 12 weeks, as well as relapse and safety.

RESULTS

Five patients with genotype 1a and three patients with genotype 1b (RAV positive) received ledipasvir/sofosbuvir for 12 weeks. SVR12 rate was 100% (8/8). Eleven patients with genotype 1b were treatment-naïve and received daclatasvir plus asunaprevir for 24 weeks. SVR12 rate was 91% (10/11). One patient experienced viral breakthrough without RAV at 12 weeks. Seven treatment-experienced patients with genotype 1b received daclatasvir plus asunaprevir for 24 weeks. SVR12 rate was 85.7% (6/7). One patient experienced viral breakthrough with RAV (L31M, Y93H) at 12 weeks. Four patients with genotype 2a/2b received sofosbuvir plus ribavirin for 12 weeks. SVR12 rate was 100% (4/4). No serious adverse event-related discontinuations were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

New direct acting antiviral treatment achieved high SVRs rates at 12 weeks in CHC patients with hemophilia without serious adverse events.

Simeprevir and daclatasvir for 12 or 24 weeks in treatment-naïve patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1b and advanced liver disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

We investigated the efficacy and safety of simeprevir plus daclatasvir in treatment-naïve patients with chronic, genotype 1b hepatitis C virus infection and advanced liver disease, excluding patients with pre-defined NS5A resistance-associated substitutions.

METHODS

This phase II, open-label, single-arm, multicentre study included patients aged ≥18 years with advanced fibrosis or compensated cirrhosis (METAVIR F3/4). Patients with NS5A-Y93H or L31M/V resistance-associated substitutions at screening were excluded. Simeprevir (150 mg)+daclatasvir (60 mg) once daily was administered for 12 or 24 weeks; treatment could be extended to 24 weeks prior to or at the Week 12 visit. Primary efficacy endpoint was sustained virological response 12 weeks after the end of treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 106 patients were treated; 27% patients were aged >65 years, 39% had cirrhosis, 53% had estimated glomerular filtration rate 30-89 mL/min, 14% had diabetes, and 38% had arterial hypertension. Overall, 42/106 received 12 weeks of treatment and 64/106 received 24 weeks of treatment. Ninety-seven (92%) patients achieved a sustained virological response 12 weeks after the end of treatment. The reasons for failure were viral breakthrough (n=7) at weeks 4-16, early treatment discontinuation (n=1) and viral relapse (n=1). Seventy-four (70%) patients had ≥1 adverse event during treatment, including six (6%) patients with ≥1 serious adverse event. Three (3%) patients discontinued treatment owing to adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Simeprevir+daclatasvir demonstrated strong antiviral activity and was well-tolerated in patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1b infection, advanced liver disease and a high prevalence of comorbidities. However, viral breakthrough occurred in seven patients, making this regimen unsatisfactory.

Interferon-Free Therapy in Elderly Patients With Advanced Liver Disease

OBJECTIVES

Interferon-free therapies have an improved safety and efficacy profile. However, data in elderly patients, who have frequently advanced liver disease, associated comorbidities, and use concomitant medications are scarce. The im of this study was to assess the effectiveness and tolerability of all-oral regimens in elderly patients in real-life clinical practice.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients aged ≥65 years receiving interferon-free regimens within the Spanish National Registry (Hepa-C).

RESULTS

Data of 1,252 patients were recorded. Of these, 955 (76%) were aged 65-74 years, 211 (17%) were aged 75-79 years, and 86 (7%) were aged ≥80 years at the start of antiviral therapy. HCV genotype-1b was predominant (88%) and 48% were previous non-responders. A significant proportion of patients had cirrhosis (922; 74%), of whom 11% presented decompensated liver disease. The most used regimens were SOF/LDV (33%), 3D (28%), and SOF/SMV (26%). Ribavirin was added in 49% of patients. Overall, the sustained virological response (SVR12) rate was 94% without differences among the three age categories. Albumin ≤3.5 g/dl was the only independent negative predictor of response (0.25 (0.15-0.41); P<0.01). Regarding tolerability, the rate of severe adverse events increased with age category (8.8, 13, and 14%; P=0.04). In addition, the main predictors of mortality (2.3%) were age ≥75 years (2.59 (1.16-5.83); P =0.02) and albumin ≤3.5 (17 (6.3-47); P <0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

SVR rates with interferon-free regimens in elderly patients are high and comparable to the general population. Baseline low albumin levels (≤3.5 g/dl) was the only predictor of treatment failure. Importantly, the rate of severe adverse events and death increased with age. Elderly patients (≥75 years) or those with advanced liver disease (albumin ≤3.5) presented higher mortality. Thus a careful selection of patients for antiviral treatment is recommended.

Real-life prevalence of resistance-associated variants against non-structural protein 5A inhibitors and efficiency of Daclatasvir + Asunaprevir therapy in Korean patients with genotype 1b hepatitis C

Background

Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) for chronic hepatitis C (CHC) treatment are tolerable and highly effective in a shorter period of time than before. However, resistance-associated variants (RAVs) can affect the efficacy of DAAs. The aim of this study was to investigate the real-life prevalence of RAVs against non-structural protein 5A (NS5A) inhibitors in Korean patients with genotype 1b chronic hepatitis C.

Methods

All consecutive patients with CHC genotype 1b who underwent a RAV test at a single referral hospital were enrolled.

Results

A total of 142 patients (male 53, female 89) were tested for RAVs. The average age of the patients was 58 years. Liver cirrhosis was found in 34.5% (49/142) of patients, and 19.0% (29/142) of patients had previously undergone interferon-based treatment. Twenty-nine patients (20.4%) had RAVs (Y93 or L31). Y93H, L31, or Y93H with L31 were detected in 22 (15.5%), 8 (5.6%), and 1 (0.7%) patients, respectively. The presence of RAV was not affected by previous interferon-based treatment or by the existence of liver cirrhosis. Among 113 patients without baseline NS5A RAVs, 72 patients started daclatasvir (DCV) + asunaprevir (ASV) treatment and 95% (68/72) patients achieved virologic response at week 4. Virologic response at end of treatment and sustained virologic response at 12 weeks after treatment were achieved by 94% (68/72) and 94% (68/72), respectively.

Conclusions

In Korean patients with genotype 1b CHC, 20.4% (29 of 142) of patients showed RAVs against NS5A inhibitors. Patient without RAVs who received treatment with DCV + ASV showed high virologic response rates in Korea.

Hepatitis C treatment from "response-guided" to "resource-guided" therapy in the transition era from interferon-containing to interferon-free regimens

Peginterferon/ribavirin has been the standard-of-care for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections: 48 weeks for genotype 1 or 4 (HCV-1/4) and 24 weeks for HCV-2/3. Response-guided therapy recommended shorter 24- and 16-week regimens for HCV-1 with lower baseline viral loads (< 400 000-800 000 IU/mL) and rapid virological response (RVR, undetectable HCV RNA at week 4) and HCV-2/3 with RVR, respectively; and extending to 72 and 48 weeks for HCV-1 slower responders and HCV-2 non-RVR patients, respectively, to improve the efficacy. The progress of directly acting antivirals (DAA), moving from interferon-containing regimens in 2011 to interferon-free regimens in 2013, has greatly improved the treatment success. Interferon-containing regimens include boceprevir or telaprevir or simeprevir or daclatasvir plus peginterferon/ribavirin, 24-48 weeks, for HCV-1 or 4. However, adding these DAA has no benefit for HCV-1 with lower baseline viral loads/RVR. Instead, 12-week sofosbuvir plus peginterferon/ribavirin attained sustained virological response rates of > 90% for HCV-1/3-6. Interferon-free regimens include two main categories: NS5B nucleotide inhibitor (sofosbuvir)-based regimens and NS3/4A inhibitor/NS5A inhibitor-based regimens (daclatasvir/asunaprevir, paritaprevir/r/ombitasvir/dasabuvir and grazoprevir/elbasvir). About 8-24 weeks interferon-free regimens could achieve sustained virological response rates of 82-99% for corresponding HCV genotypes. Although the newly DAA interferon-free regimens have high efficacy and safety, the huge budget impact increases the treatment barriers. The current recommendation should, therefore, base on the availability, indication, and cost-effectiveness in the transition era of DAA. Based on the concept of "resource-guided therapy," peginterferon/ribavirin might be applied for easy-to-treat interferon-eligible patients in resource-constrained areas. Prioritizing patients for interferon-free regimens according to "time-degenerative factors" (age and fibrosis) is justified before the regimens becoming available and affordable.

Urgency to treat patients with chronic hepatitis C in Asia

Chronic hepatitis C (CHC) infection poses a global healthcare burden, being associated with serious complications if untreated. The prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is highest in areas of Central, South, and East Asia; over 50% of HCV patients worldwide live in the region, where HCV genotypes 1b, 2, 3, and 6 are the most prevalent. Treatment outcomes for chronic hepatitis C vary by ethnicity, and Asian patients achieve higher sustained virologic response rates following interferon (IFN)-based therapy than non-Asians. However, low efficacy, poor safety profile, and subcutaneous administration limit the use of IFN-based therapies. Superior virologic outcomes have been observed with different classes of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) alone or in combination, and several all-oral DAA regimens are available in Asia. These regimens have shown excellent efficacy and favorable tolerability in clinical trials, yet there is a need for further studies of DAAs in a real world context, particularly in Asia. Furthermore, IFN-free treatment may not be accessible for many patients in the region, and IFN-based regimens remain an option in some countries. There is a need to improve current clinical practices for HCV management in Asia, including effective screening, disease awareness, and prevention programs, and to further understand the cost-effectiveness of IFN-free regimens. The evolution of potent treatments makes HCV eradication a possibility that should be available to all patients. However, access to these therapies in Asian countries has been slow, primarily because of economic barriers that continue to present a hurdle to optimal treatment.

Daclatasvir/asunaprevir based direct-acting antiviral therapy ameliorate hepatitis C virus-associated cryoglobulinemic membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis: a case report

Background

Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) dramatically improve the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections. However, the effects of DAAs on extra-hepatic manifestations such as HCV-associated glomerulonephritis, especially in cases with renal dysfunction, are not well elucidated.

Case presentation

A 69-year-old Japanese woman was diagnosed as having chronic hepatitis C, genotype 1b at the age of 55. She presented with hypertension, microscopic hematuria, proteinuria, renal dysfunction, purpura, and arthralgia at the age of 61. She also had hypocomplementemia and cryoglobulinemia. Renal biopsy revealed membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN), and she was diagnosed as having HCV-associated cryoglobulinemic MPGN. She declined interferon therapy at the time and was treated with antihypertensive medications as well as oral corticosteroid that were effective in reducing proteinuria. However, when the corticosteroid dose was reduced, proteinuria worsened. She began antiviral treatment with daclatasvir/asunaprevir (DCV/ASV). Clearance of HCV-RNA was obtained by 2 weeks and sustained, and liver function was normalized. In addition, microhematuria turned negative, proteinuria decreased, hypocomplementemia and estimated glomerular filtration rate were improved, whereas cryoglobulinemia persisted. She completed 24 weeks of therapy without significant adverse effects.

Conclusion

In a case of HCV-associated cryoglobulinemic MPGN with renal dysfunction, DCV/ASV -based DAAs ameliorated microhematuria, proteinuria and renal function without significant side effects.

Identification of Genotype 2 HCV in Serotype-1 Hepatitis C Patients Unresponsive to Daclatasvir plus Asunaprevir Treatment

It is important to determine the genotypes or serotypes of hepatitis C virus (HCV) in patients before treatment with direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs), because the effects of DAAs differ among genotypes. In Japan, two tests for HCV typing are available clinically, but only serotyping, not genotyping, is approved by the public health insurance. Although most serotype-1 Japanese patients are infected with genotype 1b HCV, it is known that a small proportion of patients show different results from two typing methods. This study focused on such patients and the effectiveness of treatment with daclatasvir plus asunaprevir (DCV/ASV) was evaluated. We analyzed 644 DCV/ASV-treated patients with serotype 1 or genotype 1b, and among them, 166 serotype-1 patients received a commercial-based direct sequencing (DS) test for resistant-associated variants of genotype 1b HCV. We found four patients (2.4%) with DS test failure, suggesting that the PCR primers targeting genotype 1b may not match. Importantly, none of the four patients achieved a sustained virological response. Our in-house DS test analyzing the 5'-untranslated region and coding regions for NS4 and NS5B of HCV showed that three of the four patients were infected with genotype 2 HCV, and one patient was infected with genotype 1a HCV. No recombinant virus of different genotypes was found. This study indicates that a subset of serotype-1 hepatitis C patients is infected with HCV of genotype 2 or 1a in Japan and that DCV/ASV is not effective for such patients. Thus, attention should be paid to DAA treatment without HCV genotyping.

Daclatasvir/asunaprevir/beclabuvir fixed-dose combination in Japanese patients with HCV genotype 1 infection

BACKGROUND

DCV-TRIO, a fixed-dose combination of daclatasvir (pangenotypic NS5A inhibitor), asunaprevir (NS3/4A protease inhibitor), and beclabuvir (non-nucleoside NS5B inhibitor), has achieved high rates of sustained virologic response at post-treatment Week 12 (SVR12) in phase 3 studies.

METHODS

In this phase 3 study, DCV-TRIO for 12 weeks and daclatasvir plus asunaprevir (DUAL) for 24 weeks were studied in Japanese patients infected with HCV genotype 1 (99 % genotype 1b).

RESULTS

SVR12 rates ≥95 % were achieved in both treatment-naive (N = 152) and interferon-experienced (N = 65) cohorts treated with DCV-TRIO for 12 weeks and were comparable across patient subgroups, including patients aged ≥65 years and those with cirrhosis. DUAL recipients (N = 75) had an SVR12 rate of 87 %. In the absence of baseline resistance-associated polymorphisms at positions NS5A-Y93H or -L31, SVR12 rates were 98 % with DCV-TRIO or DUAL. Among genotype 1b-infected patients with baseline Y93H or L31 polymorphisms, 35/38 (92 %) DCV-TRIO recipients, and 7/16 (44 %) DUAL recipients achieved SVR12. Adverse events, mostly liver related, led to treatment discontinuation in 10 % of DCV-TRIO recipients. In this group, SVR12 was achieved by 3/9 patients who discontinued before Week 4 and by 12/12 patients who completed ≥4 weeks of DCV-TRIO. Treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in 4 and 3 % of DCV-TRIO and DUAL recipients, respectively. Seven patients (9 %) discontinued DUAL due to adverse events. No deaths occurred.

CONCLUSION

SVR12 was achieved by 96 % of Japanese patients with HCV genotype 1 infection after 12 weeks of treatment with the DCV-TRIO regimen. DCV-TRIO and DUAL exhibited comparable safety profiles.

Effectiveness and safety of daclatasvir plus asunaprevir for patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1b aged 75 years and over with or without cirrhosis

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 24-week daclatasvir (NS5A inhibitor) plus asunaprevir (NS3/4 A protease inhibitor) treatment for elderly patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1b infection.

METHODS

This prospective, multicenter study consisted of 321 Japanese HCV genotype 1b patients who were interferon-ineligible/intolerant or non-responders to interferon-based regimens, including 103 (32.1%) aged ≥75 years and 127 (39.6%) with cirrhosis. Sustained virological response (SVR) at 24 weeks after the end of treatment and adverse effects were analyzed according to age.

RESULTS

The overall SVR rate was 90.3%. In terms of by age, 94.5% (69/73), 88.3% (128/145), and 90.3% (93/103) of the patients aged <65, 65-74, and ≥75 years, respectively, achieved SVR. For the entire cohort, pre-existent NS5A resistance-associated variants and prior simeprevir failure were independently associated with treatment failure. According to the analysis of patients without these unfavorable pretreatment factors, 90.8% (89/98) aged ≥75 years achieved SVR, although this was significantly lower than for those aged <65 years (98.5%, 66/67) (P < 0.05). The frequency of adverse effects was comparable for the <75 and ≥75 age groups, the most common being an elevated alanine aminotransferase level (>150 U/L, 8.7%), however, no decompensating events were seen.

CONCLUSIONS

Daclatasvir plus asunaprevir for HCV genotype 1b was well tolerated and effective for patients without pre-existent NS5A resistance-associated variants or simeprevir failure, irrespective of fibrosis status. However, it was less effective for very old patients aged ≥75 years compared to those aged <65.

Quantifying antiviral activity optimizes drug combinations against hepatitis C virus infection

With the introduction of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs), treatment against hepatitis C virus (HCV) has significantly improved. To manage and control this worldwide infectious disease better, the "best" multidrug treatment is demanded based on scientific evidence. However, there is no method available that systematically quantifies and compares the antiviral efficacy and drug-resistance profiles of drug combinations. Based on experimental anti-HCV profiles in a cell culture system, we quantified the instantaneous inhibitory potential (IIP), which is the logarithm of the reduction in viral replication events, for both single drugs and multiple-drug combinations. From the calculated IIP of 15 anti-HCV drugs from different classes [telaprevir, danoprevir, asunaprevir, simeprevir, sofosbuvir (SOF), VX-222, dasabuvir, nesbuvir, tegobuvir, daclatasvir, ledipasvir, IFN-α, IFN-λ1, cyclosporin A, and SCY-635], we found that the nucleoside polymerase inhibitor SOF had one of the largest potentials to inhibit viral replication events. We also compared intrinsic antiviral activities of a panel of drug combinations. Our quantification analysis clearly indicated an advantage of triple-DAA treatments over double-DAA treatments, with triple-DAA treatments showing enhanced antiviral activity and a significantly lower probability for drug resistance to emerge at clinically relevant drug concentrations. Our framework provides quantitative information to consider in designing multidrug strategies before costly clinical trials.

Successful treatment of three patients with human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus genotype 1b co-infection by daclatasvir plus asunaprevir

Co-infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) often accelerates the course of HCV-associated liver disease. Daclatasvir (DCV) plus asunaprevir (ASV) have been shown to be highly effective for HCV-infected patients with genotype 1b. Three patients co-infected with HIV/HCV genotype 1b were enrolled in this study. Prior to initiation of HCV treatment, the variants associated with L31 and Y93 in the non-structural protein 5A (NS5A) region of the HCV genome were confirmed to be absent using a direct sequencing method. Taking into consideration the lower risk of drug-drug interaction and the need for immediate treatment, the patients received 60 mg DCV once daily plus 100 mg ASV twice daily for 24 weeks. In one patient, the alanine aminotransferase level was elevated to 228 IU/L at 24 weeks after the start of treatment, but he completed the 24-week treatment course. All three patients achieved sustained viral response, without severe complications (including HIV virological rebound). Thus, in cases where NS5A variants are confirmed to be absent and patients are antiretroviral therapy-naïve, with CD4+ over 500/μL or HIV well controlled by RAL-based cART, DCV plus ASV may represent a good treatment option for HIV and HCV genotype 1b co-infected patients.

The practical management of chronic hepatitis C infection in Japan - dual therapy of daclatasvir + asunaprevir

Without treatment, many of the 200 million people worldwide with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection will develop cirrhosis or liver cancer. Japan was the first nation to approve an interferon-free therapy for HCV, and sustained viral response (SVR) rates >90% have been achieved with asunaprevir, a protease inhibitor, plus daclatasvir, an inhibitor of the non-structural 5A (NS5A) protein. Areas covered: This review provides an overview of the results from both clinical trials and real world experience with asunaprevir and daclatasvir therapy focused primarily on Japan. A literature search using the keywords 'asunaprevir,' 'daclatasvir,' 'interferon-free therapy,' and 'direct-acting antiviral drugs' was initially used to select relevant literature for inclusion in the review. Expert commentary: While not approved in the United States, dual therapy with asunaprevir plus daclatasvir has already been successfully used in Japan and throughout East Asia to treat many thousands of patients. Pre-existing or treatment-emergent NS5A-Y93 or -L31 resistance-associated variants (RAVs) may lead to viral breakthrough, and alternative therapies should be considered for these patients, but patients who harbor NS5A RAVs only at low frequency are likely to achieve SVR. The therapy has also been shown to be safe and effective with renal dysfunction or liver cirrhosis.

Clinical Significance of Two Real-Time PCR Assays for Chronic Hepatitis C Patients Receiving Protease Inhibitor-Based Therapy

The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of two hepatitis C virus (HCV) real-time PCR assays, the COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HCV test (CAP/CTM) and the Abbott RealTime HCV test (ART), for predicting the clinical outcomes of patients infected with HCV who received telaprevir (TVR)-based triple therapy or daclatasvir/asunaprevir (DCV/ASV) dual therapy. The rapid virological response rates in patients receiving TVR-based triple therapy were 92% (23/25) and 40% (10/25) for CAP/CTM and ART, respectively. The false omission rate (FOR) of ART was 93.3% (14/15), indicating that CAP/CTM could accurately predict clinical outcome in the early phase. In an independent examination of 20 patients receiving TVR-based triple therapy who developed viral breakthrough or relapse, the times to HCV disappearance by ART were longer than by CAP/CTM, whereas the times to HCV reappearance were similar. In an independent experiment of WHO standard HCV RNA serially diluted in serum containing TVR, the analytical sensitivities of CAP/CTM and ART were similar. However, cell cultures transfected with HCV and grown in medium containing TVR demonstrated that ART detected HCV RNA for a longer time than CAP/CTM. Similar results were found for 42 patients receiving DCV/ASV dual therapy. The FOR of ART was 73.3% (11/15) at week 8 after initiation of therapy, indicating that ART at week 8 could not accurately predict the clinical outcome. In conclusion, although CAP/CTM and ART detected HCV RNA with comparable analytical sensitivity, CAP/CTM might be preferable for predicting the clinical outcomes of patients receiving protease inhibitor-based therapy.

Daclatasvir plus asunaprevir dual therapy for chronic HCV genotype 1b infection: results of Turkish early access program

 Background. Daclatasvir and asunaprevir dual therapy is approved for the treatment of HCV genotype 1b infection in several countries.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of daclatasvir and asunaprevir dual therapy in Turkish patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Sixty-one patients with HCV genotype 1b were enrolled in the Turkish early access program. Most of the patients were in difficult-to-treat category. Patients were visited at each 4 week throughout the follow-up period. Laboratory findings and adverse events were recorded at each visit.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven of 61 enrolled patients completed 24 weeks of treatment. Two patients died as a result of underlying diseases at 12-14th weeks of treatment. Two patients stopped the treatment early as a consequence of virological breakthrough, and 2 patients had viral relapse at the post-treatment follow-up. Overall SVR12 rates were 90% (55/61) and 93.2% (55/59) according to intention-to-treat (ITT) and per protocol (PP) analysis respectively. In ITT analysis, SVR12 was achieved by 93% (13/14) in relapsers, 80% (12/15) in interferon-ineligible patients and 91% (20/22) in previous nonresponder patients. SVR12 rates were 86.5% and 91.4% in patients with cirrhosis according to ITT and PP analysis respectively. SVR12 was 95.8% in non-cirrhosis group in both analysis. Patients with previous protease inhibitor experience had an SVR12 of 87.5%. Common adverse events developed in 28.8% of patients. There were no treatment related severe adverse event or grade-4 laboratory abnormality.

CONCLUSIONS

Daclatasvir and asunaprevir dual therapy is found to be effective and safe in difficult-to-treat Turkish patients with HCV genotype 1b infection.

Efficacy of daclatasvir/asunaprevir according to resistance-associated variants in chronic hepatitis C with genotype 1

BACKGROUND

The present study explored the treatment outcome of daclatasvir (DCV) and asunaprevir (ASV) therapy combining oral direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) for chronic hepatitis C (HCV) including liver cirrhosis according to resistance-associated variants (RAVs) in NS3/NS5A region.

METHODS

Overall, 641 patients enrolled in Japan with HCV-1b received DCV and ASV for 24 weeks. Baseline drug-resistant mutations L31F/I/M/V, Q54H, P58S, A92K, and Y93H in the HCV NS5A region and V36A, T54A/S, Q80K/L/R, R155K/T/Q, A156S/V/T, and D168A/E/H/T/V in the HCV NS3/4A region were assessed by direct sequencing.

RESULTS

Overall, 86.9 % (543/625) of patients had SVR12, which was significantly higher in NS5A 93Y (wild) (88.3 %) compared with NS5A 93H at baseline (48.0 %), indicating the SVR12 rate was significantly lower in patients with 93H mutations. Additionally, 66.7 % (18/27) of patients with prior triple therapy including simeprevir (SMV) failure had virological failure. The virological failure rate of DCV/ASV therapy after SMV failure was significantly higher in those with preexisting NS3/4A 168 substitutions compared with without substitutions at baseline [84.2 % (16/19) vs. 28.6 % (2/7), p = 0.014]. The number of patients with multiple RAVs or deletions in NS5A increased from 0 to 85 % in failed patients. Alanine aminotransferase elevation was a frequent adverse event causing discontinuation of DCV/ASV therapy, although 87.5 % (14/16) patients achieved SVR12, subsequently.

CONCLUSIONS

History of SMV therapy and pre-existing NS5A Y93H were associated with virological failure of DCV/ASV therapy, resulting in the emergence of multiple RAVs. Patients with RAVs at baseline should be assessed to optimize future DAA therapies.

Effect of minor populations of NS5A and NS5B resistance-associated variants on HCV genotype-3 response to daclatasvir plus sofosbuvir, with or without ribavirin

BACKGROUND

Treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 3 (GT3) is a medical priority. All-oral treatment of HCV GT3 with daclatasvir (DCV) and sofosbuvir (SOF), with or without ribavirin (RBV), is recommended by several treatment guidelines. The impact of HCV minority populations at amino acid positions in NS5A and NS5B associated with drug resistance on response to DCV+SOF±RBV was assessed in SOF-naive and SOF-experienced HCV patients.

METHODS

The presence of baseline NS5A or NS5B polymorphisms was assessed in 227 and 167 HCV-GT3-infected patients, respectively, from four clinical studies of DCV+SOF±RBV. Polymorphisms were identified at a sequencing detection threshold of ≥10%, and at ≥1% by next-generation sequencing (NGS) for a subset.

RESULTS

No SOF resistance-associated polymorphisms were detected at baseline. Among 58 patients with prospective baseline sequencing data at ≥10% and ≥1%, detectable NS5A substitutions at A30 (A30K/R/S/T/V), S62 (S62A/F/K/L/T) or Y93H were 38% more prevalent at ≥1% compared with ≥10% (55% [32/58] versus 41% [24/58] of patients), although sustained virological response (SVR) in patients with these substitutions remained the same at both sequencing thresholds (88%). Only one additional Y93H was detected at ≥1%; the patient achieved SVR. In two virological failures with baseline Y93H, a minority S62L substitution at baseline was enriched from <20% to ≥95% at failure. Treatment-emergent minority populations (at A30, L31, P32, P58 and E92) observed by NGS in four virological failures became undetectable by week 24 post-treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Sequencing at a depth of ≥10% appears to be sufficient to predict HCV GT3 response to DCV+SOF±RBV.

A Review of Daclatasvir Drug-Drug Interactions

The treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has been revolutionized in recent years by the development of direct-acting antiviral regimens that do not contain peginterferon (pegIFN) and/or ribavirin (RBV). While direct-acting antiviral-based regimens have been shown to be greatly superior to pegIFN/RBV-based regimens in terms of efficacy and safety, they have a greater susceptibility to drug-drug interactions (DDIs). Daclatasvir (DCV)-the benchmark pangenotypic nonstructural protein 5A inhibitor-has been shown to be efficacious and generally well tolerated in partnership with other HCV direct-acting antivirals, including sofosbuvir, asunaprevir (ASV), and ASV plus beclabuvir. DCV may be the object of a DDI via the induction or inhibition of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and/or P-glycoprotein (P-gp) by the concomitant medication, or the precipitant of a DDI via DCV-based induction/inhibition of CYP 3A4 or inhibition of P-gp, organic anion transporting polypeptide 1B1/B3, and/or breast cancer resistance protein. This article presents an overview of the drug interaction studies conducted during the clinical development of DCV, the findings of these studies that led to the guidance on concomitant medication use and dosage along with any required DCV dose modifications, and the use of the known metabolic pathway of DCV to guide concomitant dosing where direct drug-drug studies have not been conducted. The robust characterization of the DCV clinical pharmacology program has demonstrated that DCV has few or no clinically relevant DDIs with medications with which it is likely to be co-administered, and the majority of DDIs that do occur can be predicted and easily managed.

FUNDING

Bristol-Myers Squibb.

A phase 3, open-label study of daclatasvir plus asunaprevir in Asian patients with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1b infection who are ineligible for or intolerant to interferon alfa therapies with or without ribavirin

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Daclatasvir plus asunaprevir has demonstrated efficacy and safety in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1b infection. This study focused on evaluating daclatasvir plus asunaprevir in interferon (±ribavirin)-ineligible or -intolerant Asian patients with genotype 1b infection from mainland China, Korea, and Taiwan.

METHODS

Interferon (±ribavirin)-ineligible and -intolerant patients with genotype 1b infection received daclatasvir 60 mg tablets once daily plus asunaprevir 100 mg soft capsules twice daily for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was sustained virologic response at post-treatment week 24 (SVR24).

RESULTS

Of the 159 patients treated, 89.3% were Chinese, 65.4% were female, and 73.6% were interferon-intolerant. Cirrhosis was present in 32.7% of patients, and 40.3% had IL28B non-CC genotypes. SVR24 was achieved by 145/159 (91.2%) patients (100% concordance with SVR12) and was similarly high in cirrhotic patients (47/52, 90.4%). SVR24 was higher in patients without baseline NS5A (L31M or Y93H) resistance-associated variants (RAVs) (137/139, 98.6%), including those with cirrhosis (43/44, 97.7%). Prevalence of baseline NS5A RAVs was low (19/159, 11.9%), particularly in mainland China (10/127, 7.9%). One death (0.6%), five serious adverse events (3.1%), and three grade 4 laboratory abnormalities (1.9%) occurred on treatment; none were considered related to study drugs. Two patients (1.3%) discontinued because of adverse events. Treatment was generally well tolerated regardless of cirrhosis status.

CONCLUSIONS

Daclatasvir plus asunaprevir achieved a SVR24 rate of 91.2%, rising to 98.6% in patients without baseline NS5A RAVs, and was generally well tolerated in interferon (±ribavirin)-ineligible or -intolerant patients with genotype 1b infection from mainland China, Korea, and Taiwan.

All-oral daclatasvir plus asunaprevir for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1b infection: a sub-analysis in Asian patients from the HALLMARK DUAL study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Daclatasvir plus asunaprevir (DCV + ASV) has demonstrated potent antiviral activity in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1b (GT-1b) infection in the HALLMARK DUAL trial. This post hoc analysis was conducted to determine the efficacy and safety of this treatment in Asian patients.

METHODS

Treatment-naive patients were randomly assigned (2:1; double-blinded) to receive DCV (60 mg once daily) plus ASV (100 mg twice daily) or placebo for 12 weeks. Subsequently, placebo patients entered another study, and the remaining patients continued treatment for an additional 12 weeks. Non-responders to peginterferon/ribavirin and ineligible/intolerant patients received dual therapy for 24 weeks. Sustained virological response at post-treatment Week 12 [sustained virological response (SVR)12] and safety outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

This post hoc analysis included 186 Asian patients (Korean, 78; Taiwanese, 85; others, 23), of whom 32.3% were cirrhotic. SVR12 was observed in 92.3, 78.6 and 80.0% of treatment-naive, ineligible/intolerant and non-responder patients, respectively, and was comparable with non-Asian patients. SVR12 by baseline factors including age, viral load, interleukin-28B genotype and cirrhosis status was similar between the Asian sub-cohorts. Among 18 Asian patients with NS5A-Y93H or NS5A-L31M/V resistance-associated variants (RAVs), seven patients achieved SVR12. Multivariate regression analysis showed a significant influence of NS5A RAVs in both Asian and non-Asian cohorts. The incidence of serious adverse events in Asian patients was low (7.2%). Two Taiwanese patients had elevated alanine aminotransferase (≥5.1 × ULN); both achieved SVR12.

CONCLUSIONS

All-oral dual therapy with DCV + ASV resulted in high SVR rates and was well tolerated in Asian patients with HCV GT-1b infection.

Evaluation of Resistance-Associated Substitutions in NS5A Using Direct Sequence and Cycleave Method and Treatment Outcome with Daclatasvir and Asunaprevir for Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 1

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of daclatasvir plus asunaprevir therapy in patients infected with hepatitis C virus and determine its relevance to resistant variants.

METHODS

A total of 629 consecutive patients infected with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 were assessed. Daclatasvir (60 mg/day) plus asunaprevir (200 mg/day) was given for 24 weeks. The virological responses and resistance-associated substitutions of hepatitis C virus mutants were examined by the direct sequence and cycleave methods were evaluated.

RESULTS

Overall, 89.4% (555/621) of patients exhibited a sustained virological response (SVR). The SVR rates in the patients with wild type, mixed, and mutant type Y93 by direct sequencing were 92.5% (520/562), 70.3% (26/37), and 42.9% (9/21), respectively. The SVR rates in the patients with 100%, 90%, 80%-30%, and 20%-0% Y93 wild by the cycleave method were 93.4% (456/488), 88.2%(30/34), 56.0%(14/25), and 36.8%(7/19), respectively. In contrast, the SVR rates for the wild type and mixed/mutant type L31 by direct sequencing were 90.2% (534/592) and 72.4% (21/29), respectively. In the multivariate analyses, the wild type Y93, no history of simeprevir therapy, the wild type L31, and low HCV RNA level were independent factors of SVR.

CONCLUSION

NS5A resistance-associated substitutions, especially Y93H, were major factors predicting the SVR. Although direct sequencing can predict the SVR rate, the cycleave method is considered to be more useful for predicting the SVR when used in combination.

Evaluation of Resistance-Associated Substitutions in NS5A Using Direct Sequence and Cycleave Method and Treatment Outcome with Daclatasvir and Asunaprevir for Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 1

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of daclatasvir plus asunaprevir therapy in patients infected with hepatitis C virus and determine its relevance to resistant variants.

METHODS

A total of 629 consecutive patients infected with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 were assessed. Daclatasvir (60 mg/day) plus asunaprevir (200 mg/day) was given for 24 weeks. The virological responses and resistance-associated substitutions of hepatitis C virus mutants were examined by the direct sequence and cycleave methods were evaluated.

RESULTS

Overall, 89.4% (555/621) of patients exhibited a sustained virological response (SVR). The SVR rates in the patients with wild type, mixed, and mutant type Y93 by direct sequencing were 92.5% (520/562), 70.3% (26/37), and 42.9% (9/21), respectively. The SVR rates in the patients with 100%, 90%, 80%-30%, and 20%-0% Y93 wild by the cycleave method were 93.4% (456/488), 88.2%(30/34), 56.0%(14/25), and 36.8%(7/19), respectively. In contrast, the SVR rates for the wild type and mixed/mutant type L31 by direct sequencing were 90.2% (534/592) and 72.4% (21/29), respectively. In the multivariate analyses, the wild type Y93, no history of simeprevir therapy, the wild type L31, and low HCV RNA level were independent factors of SVR.

CONCLUSION

NS5A resistance-associated substitutions, especially Y93H, were major factors predicting the SVR. Although direct sequencing can predict the SVR rate, the cycleave method is considered to be more useful for predicting the SVR when used in combination.

Characterization of NS5A polymorphisms and their impact on response rates in patients with HCV genotype 2 treated with daclatasvir-based regimens

OBJECTIVE

Daclatasvir (DCV) is a pan-genotypic non-structural protein 5A (NS5A) inhibitor that is approved for treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype (GT)1 and GT3 in the USA and GT1, GT3 and GT4 in Europe. We set out to examine the impact of daclatasvir-based regimens on the sustained virologic response (SVR) in patients with GT2 infection with respect to GT2 subtype and NS5A polymorphisms at amino acid positions associated with daclatasvir resistance.

METHODS

Analyses were performed on 283 GT2 NS5A sequences from five daclatasvir regimen-based clinical trials (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT-01257204, NCT-01359644, NCT-02032875, NCT-02032888 and NCT-01616524) and 143 NS5A sequences from the Los Alamos HCV database. Susceptibility analyses of substitutions at amino acid positions associated with daclatasvir resistance and patient-derived NS5A sequences were performed using an in vitro HCV replication assay.

RESULTS

Of 13 GT2 subtypes identified from 426 NS5A sequences, the most prevalent were GT2a (32%), GT2b (48%) and GT2c (10%). The most prevalent NS5A polymorphism was L31M (GT2a = 88%; GT2b = 59%; GT2c = 10%). Substitutions identified in 96% of GT2 NS5A sequences exhibited daclatasvir EC₅₀ values ranging from 0.005 to 20 nM when tested in vitro. A similar range in daclatasvir EC₅₀ values was observed for 16 diverse GT2 patient-derived NS5A sequences (EC₅₀ = 0.005-60 nM). Depending on the daclatasvir-based regimen studied (daclatasvir/interferon-based or daclatasvir/sofosbuvir-based), SVR rates ranged from 90% to 100% in GT2 patients with the most prevalent baseline NS5A-L31M polymorphism, compared with from 96% to 100% without this polymorphism.

CONCLUSIONS

High SVR rates were achieved in patients infected with GT2 treated with daclatasvir-based regimens irrespective of GT2 subtype or baseline NS5A polymorphisms.

APASL consensus statements and recommendations for hepatitis C prevention, epidemiology, and laboratory testing

The Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL) convened an international working party on "APASL consensus statements and recommendations for management of hepatitis C" in March 2015 to revise the "APASL consensus statements and management algorithms for hepatitis C virus infection" (Hepatol Int 6:409-435, 2012). The working party consisted of expert hepatologists from the Asian-Pacific region gathered at the Istanbul Congress Center, Istanbul, Turkey on 13 March 2015. New data were presented, discussed, and debated during the course of drafting a revision. Participants of the consensus meeting assessed the quality of the cited studies. The finalized recommendations for hepatitis C prevention, epidemiology, and laboratory testing are presented in this review.