Triage of patients for attenuation-corrected stress-first Tc-99m SPECT MPI using a simplified clinical pre-test scoring model

10-year experience of utilizing a stress-first SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging

BACKGROUND

Despite its potential benefits, the utilization of stress-only protocol in clinical practice has been limited. We report utilizing stress-first single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI).

METHODS

We assessed 12,472 patients who were referred for SPECT-MPI between 2013 and 2020. The temporal changes in frequency of stress-only imaging were assessed according to risk factors, mode of stress, prior coronary artery disease (CAD) history, left ventricular function, and symptom status. The clinical endpoint was all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

In our lab, stress/rest SPECT-MPI in place of rest/stress SPECT-MPI was first introduced in November 2011 and was performed more commonly than rest/stress imaging after 2013. Stress-only SPECT-MPI scanning has been performed in 30-34% of our SPECT-MPI studies since 2013 (i.e.. 31.7% in 2013 and 33.6% in 2020). During the study period, we routinely used two-position imaging (additional prone or upright imaging) to reduce attenuation and motion artifact and introduced SPECT/CT scanner in 2018. The rate of stress-only study remained consistent before and after implementing the SPECT/CT scanner. The frequency of stress-only imaging was 43% among patients without a history of prior CAD and 19% among those with a prior CAD history. Among patients undergoing treadmill exercise, the frequency of stress-only imaging was 48%, while 32% among patients undergoing pharmacologic stress test. In multivariate Cox analysis, there was no significant difference in mortality risk between stress-only and stress/rest protocols in patients with normal SPECT-MPI results (p = 0.271).

CONCLUSION

Implementation of a stress-first imaging protocol has consistently resulted in safe cancellation of 30% of rest SPECT-MPI studies.

Stress-only versus rest-stress SPECT MPI in the detection and diagnosis of myocardial ischemia and infarction by machine learning

BACKGROUND

Rest-stress SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is widely used to evaluate coronary artery disease (CAD). We aim to evaluate stress-only versus rest-stress MPI in diagnosing CAD by machine learning (ML).

METHODS

A total of 276 patients with suspected CAD were randomly divided into training (184 patients) and validation (92 patients) cohorts. Variables extracted from clinical, physiological, and rest-stress SPECT MPI were screened. Stress-only and rest-stress MPI using ML were established and compared using the training cohort. Then the diagnostic performance of two models in diagnosing myocardial ischemia and infarction was evaluated in the validation cohort.

RESULTS

Six ML models based on stress-only MPI selected summed stress score, summed wall thickness score of stress%, and end-diastolic volume of stress as key variables and performed equally good as rest-stress MPI in detecting CAD [area under the curve (AUC): 0.863 versus 0.877, P  = 0.519]. Furthermore, stress-only MPI showed a reasonable prediction of reversible deficit, as shown by rest-stress MPI (AUC: 0.861). Subsequently, nomogram models using the above-stated stress-only MPI variables showed a good prediction of CAD and reversible perfusion deficit in training and validation cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Stress-only MPI demonstrated similar diagnostic performance compared with rest-stress MPI using 6 ML algorithms. Stress-only MPI with ML models can diagnose CAD and predict ischemia from scar.

Optimizing stress-only myocardial perfusion imaging: a clinical prediction model to improve patient selection

BACKGROUND

Stress-only single photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) offers numerous advantages in terms of improved workflow, cost and radiation reduction but is currently not widely utilized due to challenges in selecting appropriate patients for this technique.

METHODS

Data from 5959 individuals were used to derive (N = 4018) and validate (N = 1941) a binomial logistic regression model to predict normal stress MPI studies (stress total perfusion deficit  < 4%, ejection fraction ≥ 50%). Model performance was analyzed using receiver operator characteristic curves. A simplified point-scoring system was developed and its impact on imaging workflow was assessed.

RESULTS

Significant predictors of abnormal vs. normal stress MPI included male sex, age > 65 years, cardiomyopathy, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, angina, and pharmacological stress. The final model and simplified scoring system were associated with areas under the curve of 0.81 (95% CI 0.79-0.83) and 0.80 (95% CI 0.79-0.82) in the validation group, respectively. Use of the scoring system was estimated to result in a decrease of 56.5% in the number of non-contributory imaging studies acquired with minimal patient rescheduling.

CONCLUSION

A prediction tool derived from simple clinical information can identify candidates for stress-only MPI studies with a beneficial impact on departmental workflow.

Diagnostic safety of a machine learning-based automatic patient selection algorithm for stress-only myocardial perfusion SPECT

BACKGROUND

Stress-only myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) markedly reduces radiation dose, scanning time, and cost. We developed an automated clinical algorithm to safely cancel unnecessary rest imaging with high sensitivity for obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients without known CAD undergoing both MPI and invasive coronary angiography from REFINE SPECT were studied. A machine learning score (MLS) for prediction of obstructive CAD was generated using stress-only MPI and pre-test clinical variables. An MLS threshold with a pre-defined sensitivity of 95% was applied to the automated patient selection algorithm. Obstructive CAD was present in 1309/2079 (63%) patients. MLS had higher area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) for prediction of CAD than reader diagnosis and TPD (0.84 vs 0.70 vs 0.78, P < .01). An MLS threshold of 0.29 had superior sensitivity than reader diagnosis and TPD for obstructive CAD (95% vs 87% vs 87%, P < .01) and high-risk CAD, defined as stenosis of the left main, proximal left anterior descending, or triple-vessel CAD (sensitivity 96% vs 89% vs 90%, P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

The MLS is highly sensitive for prediction of both obstructive and high-risk CAD from stress-only MPI and can be applied to a stress-first protocol for automatic cancellation of unnecessary rest imaging.

Prognostically safe stress-only single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging guided by machine learning: report from REFINE SPECT

AIMS

Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) stress-only protocols reduce radiation exposure and cost but require clinicians to make immediate decisions regarding rest scan cancellation. We developed a machine learning (ML) approach for automatic rest scan cancellation and evaluated its prognostic safety.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In total, 20 414 patients from a solid-state SPECT MPI international multicentre registry with clinical data and follow-up for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were used to train ML for MACE prediction as a continuous probability (ML score), using 10-fold repeated hold-out testing to separate test from training data. Three ML score thresholds (ML1, ML2, and ML3) were derived by matching the cancellation rates achieved by physician interpretation and two clinical selection rules. Annual MACE rates were compared in patients selected for rest scan cancellation between approaches. Patients selected for rest scan cancellation with ML had lower annualized MACE rates than those selected by physician interpretation or clinical selection rules (ML1 vs. physician interpretation: 1.4 ± 0.1% vs. 2.1 ± 0.1%; ML2 vs. clinical selection: 1.5 ± 0.1% vs. 2.0 ± 0.1%; ML3 vs. stringent clinical selection: 0.6 ± 0.1% vs. 1.7 ± 0.1%, all P < 0.0001) at matched cancellation rates (60 ± 0.7, 64 ± 0.7, and 30 ± 0.6%). Annualized all-cause mortality rates in populations recommended for rest cancellation by physician interpretation, clinical selection approaches were higher (1.3%, 1.2%, and 1.0%, respectively) compared with corresponding ML thresholds (0.6%, 0.6%, and 0.2%).

CONCLUSION

ML, using clinical and stress imaging data, can be used to automatically recommend cancellation of rest SPECT MPI scans, while ensuring higher prognostic safety than current clinical approaches.

A Clinical Tool to Identify Candidates for Stress-First Myocardial Perfusion Imaging

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to develop a clinical model that identifies a lower-risk population for coronary artery disease that could benefit from stress-first myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) protocols and that can be used at point of care to risk stratify patients.

BACKGROUND

There is an increasing interest in stress-first and stress-only imaging to reduce patient radiation exposure and improve patient workflow and experience.

METHODS

A secondary analysis was conducted on a single-center cohort of patients undergoing single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET) studies. Normal MPI was defined by the absence of perfusion abnormalities and other ischemic markers and the presence of normal left ventricular wall motion and left ventricular ejection fraction. A model was derived using a cohort of 18,389 consecutive patients who underwent SPECT and was validated in a separate cohort of patients who underwent SPECT (n = 5,819), 1 internal cohort of patients who underwent PET (n=4,631), and 1 external PET cohort (n = 7,028).

RESULTS

Final models were made for men and women and consisted of 9 variables including age, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, typical angina, prior percutaneous coronary intervention, prior coronary artery bypass graft, and prior myocardial infarction. Patients with a score ≤1 were stratified as low risk. The model was robust with areas under the curve of 0.684 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.674 to 0.694) and 0.681 (95% CI: 0.666 to 0.696) in the derivation cohort, 0.745 (95% CI: 0.728 to 0.762) and 0.701 (95% CI: 0.673 to 0.728) in the SPECT validation cohort, 0.672 (95% CI: 0.649 to 0.696) and 0.686 (95% CI: 0.663 to 0.710) in the internal PET validation cohort, and 0.756 (95% CI: 0.740 to 0.772) and 0.737 (95% CI: 0.716 to 0.757) in the external PET validation cohort in men and women, respectively. Men and women who scored ≤1 had negative likelihood ratios of 0.48 and 0.52, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A novel model, based on easily obtained clinical variables, is proposed to identify patients with low probability of having abnormal MPI results. This point-of-care tool may be used to identify a population that might qualify for stress-first MPI protocols.