Deceased donor liver transplant: Experience from a public sector hospital in India

Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation in India: First Report of 5-y Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Paucity of deceased donor livers has resulted in a 10-fold rise in living donor liver transplantations (LDLTs) performed in India over the past decade. Nonetheless, number of deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) performed has improved with the establishment of simplified legal framework for certification of brain death and organ donation. In this study, we present our outcomes of DDLT performed at various centers, comparing their outcomes and provide a snapshot of the increasing number of DDLT across the state over the years.

METHODS

All consecutive patients who underwent liver transplants from January 2010 till December 2019 by our transplant team in the state of Tamil Nadu, India, were included in the study. The program was established initially at the primary hospital in the year 2010 and with the evolution of the initial experience, transplant programs were expanded to the others hospital from the year 2015. Preoperative clinical data, intraoperative characteristics, and posttransplant outcomes of DDLT were analyzed from our prospective database.

RESULTS

A total of 362 DDLTs (331 adults, 31 children) were performed at 11 centers. Median (range) model for end-stage liver disease score was 16 (6-39). Forty-eight split, 11 combined liver kidney, and 4 auxiliary DDLTs were performed. One-, 3-, and 5-y survival was 87.2%, 80.4%, and 76.6% in adults and 80.6%, 80.6%, and 80.6% in children, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In a country where over 80% of the LTs are performed as LDLT, we provide the first report of a heartening trend of increasing number of DDLT programs being established with excellent 5-y outcomes.

Hepatic artery-related complications after live donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Hepatic artery-related complications (HARC) after live donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is associated with high morbidity and mortality rate.

METHODS

Prospectively maintained data from July 2011 to September 2020 was analyzed for etiology, detection, management, and outcome of HARC.

RESULTS

Six hundred fifty-seven LDLT (adult 572/pediatrics 85) were performed during the study period. Twenty-one (3.2%) patient developed HARC; 16 (2.4%) hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) and 5 (0.76%) non-thrombotic hepatic artery complication (NTHAC). Ninety percent (19/21) HARC were asymptomatic and detected on protocol Doppler. Median time to detection was day 4 (range - 1 to 35), which included 18 early (within 7 days) vs 3 late incidents. Only one pediatric patient had HAT. Seven patients underwent surgical revascularization, 11 had endovascular intervention and 3 with attenuated flow required only systemic anticoagulation. All NTHAC survived without any sequelae. Revascularization was successful in 81% (13/16) with HAT. Biliary complications were seen in 5 (23.8%); four were managed successfully. Overall mortality was 14.8% (3/21). The 1-year and 5-year survival were similar to those who did not develop HARC (80.9% vs 84.2%, p = 0.27 and 71.4% vs 75.19%, p = 0.36 respectively) but biliary complications were significantly higher (23.8% vs 14.2%, p = 0.03). On multivariate analysis, clockwise technique of arterial reconstruction was associated with decreased risk of HAT (1.7% vs 4.1% (p value - 0.003)).

CONCLUSION

Technical refinement, early detection, and revascularization can achieve good outcome in patients with HARC after LDLT.

Living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma in Indian patients- Is the scenario different?

BACKGROUND

Living donor liver transplant (LDLT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been controversial in terms of selection and outcome. We share our experience of LDLT for HCC in Indian patients.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing LDLT for HCC discovered either preoperatively or incidentally on explant pathology was done. Preoperative characteristics and explant histopathology findings were recorded. Overall, recurrence-free survival and factors predicting recurrence were analyzed.

RESULTS

Six hundred and eleven LDLT were performed between June 2011 and October 2019. HCC constituted 6.5% (n = 53) of transplant activity. Forty had preoperative diagnosis, while 13 were detected incidentally. The median model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score was 18 for patients with HCC. Only in 10 patients (19%), HCC was the primary indication for liver transplant (LT), and the rest had undergone transplant for progressive decompensation. Thirty-two patients were within up-to-7, while 21 were outside up-to-7 criteria. Overall 5-year survival was 85.4% and recurrence-free survival was 83.3% after a median follow-up of 35 months (13-59). This was similar to LDLT for other indications (81.2% at 5 years). Risk Estimation of Tumor Recurrence After Transplant (RETREAT) score was best able to predict recurrence (p = 0.03) with odds ratio of 6.8.

CONCLUSION

Patients with HCC in India present late for liver transplant. Most patients have some form of decompensation before they undergo LT. In selected patients, overall survival was comparable with other indications for LDLT with acceptable recurrence rates. RETREAT score was best to predict recurrence.

Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Acute Liver Failure: Donor Safety and Recipient Outcome

In countries where deceased organ donation is sparse, emergency living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is the only lifesaving option in select patients with acute liver failure (ALF). The aim of the current study is living liver donor safety and recipient outcomes following LDLT for ALF. A total of 410 patients underwent LDLT between March 2011 and February 2018, out of which 61 (14.9%) were for ALF. All satisfied the King's College criteria (KCC). Median admission to transplant time was 48 hours (range, 24-80.5 hours), and median living donor evaluation time was 18 hours (14-20 hours). Median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score was 37 (32-40) with more than two-thirds having grade 3 or 4 encephalopathy and 70% being on mechanical ventilation. The most common etiology was viral (37%). Median jaundice-to-encephalopathy time was 15 (9-29) days. Preoperative culture was positive in 47.5%. There was no difference in the complication rate among emergency and elective living liver donors (13.1% versus 21.2%; P = 0.19). There was no donor mortality. For patients who met the KCC but did not undergo LT, survival was 22.8% (29/127). The 5-year post-LT actuarial survival was 65.57% with a median follow-up of 35 months. On multivariate analysis, postoperative worsening of cerebral edema (CE; hazard ratio [HR], 2.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-6.31), systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS; HR, 16.7; 95% CI, 2.05-136.7), preoperative culture positivity (HR, 6.54; 95% CI, 2.24-19.07), and a longer anhepatic phase duration (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.02) predicted poor outcomes. In conclusion, emergency LDLT is lifesaving in selected patients with ALF. Outcomes of emergency living liver donation were comparable to that of elective donors. Postoperative worsening of CE, preoperative SIRS, and sepsis predicted outcome after LDLT for ALF.