The Impact of ESR1 Mutations on the Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer

DNA Damage Responses in Tumors Are Not Proliferative Stimuli, but Rather They Are DNA Repair Actions Requiring Supportive Medical Care

BACKGROUND

In tumors, somatic mutagenesis presumably drives the DNA damage response (DDR) via altered regulatory pathways, increasing genomic instability and proliferative activity. These considerations led to the standard therapeutic strategy against cancer: the disruption of mutation-activated DNA repair pathways of tumors.

PURPOSE

Justifying that cancer cells are not enemies to be killed, but rather that they are ill human cells which have the remnants of physiologic regulatory pathways.

RESULTS

1. Genomic instability and cancer development may be originated from a flaw in estrogen signaling rather than excessive estrogen signaling; 2. Healthy cells with genomic instability exhibit somatic mutations, helping DNA restitution; 3. Somatic mutations in tumor cells aim for the restoration of DNA damage, rather than further genomic derangement; 4. In tumors, estrogen signaling drives the pathways of DNA stabilization, leading to apoptotic death; 5. In peritumoral cellular infiltration, the genomic damage of the tumor induces inflammatory cytokine secretion and increased estrogen synthesis. In the inflammatory cells, an increased growth factor receptor (GFR) signaling confers the unliganded activation of estrogen receptors (ERs); 6. In breast cancer cells responsive to genotoxic therapy, constitutive mutations help the upregulation of estrogen signaling and consequential apoptosis. In breast tumors non-responsive to genotoxic therapy, the possibilities for ER activation via either liganded or unliganded pathways are exhausted, leading to farther genomic instability and unrestrained proliferation.

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding the real character and behavior of human tumors at the molecular level suggests that we should learn the genome repairing methods of tumors and follow them by supportive therapy, rather than provoking additional genomic damages.

Anti-cancer targets and molecular mechanisms of formononetin in treating osteosarcoma based on network pharmacology

Osteosarcoma (OS) is a multifactorial bone malignancy that accounts for most cancers in children and adolescents. Formononetin has been proven to exhibit various pharmacological effects including anti-tumor, anti-obesity, anti-inflammation, and neuroprotective effects. Few studies have examined the pharmacological activities of formononetin in OS treatment, but the mechanism has not yet been completely elucidated. Network pharmacology is a new method based on the theory of system biology for analyzing the network of biological systems and selecting specific signal nodes for multi-target drug molecular design. Here, we used network pharmacology to explore the possible mechanism of formononetin in OS treatment. Human OS cell line MG63 was processed with four concentrations (0, 2, 5, 8 μg/mL) of formononetin. Subsequently, an MTT assay was performed to test cell proliferation and a scratch test was used to evaluate the migration ability of cancer cells. Caspase-3, p53, p21, and bcl-2 expression levels incubated with different concentrations of formononetin in MG63 cells were determined using Western blotting. After treated with formononetin for 48 h, MG63 cells exhibited marked apoptosis. The results revealed that certain concentrations of formononetin significantly exerted inhibitory effects on MG63 cell proliferation. Furthermore, formononetin decreased the bcl-2 level in MG63 cells but increased caspase-3, p21, and p53 levels in a concentration-dependent manner. Additionally, formononetin suppressed the expression of SATB2. Therefore, formononetin could dose-dependently inhibit MG63 cell proliferation and induce apparent cell apoptosis, providing a candidate treatment for OS, whereas SATB2 could be a potential prognostic biomarker for screening OS and therapeutic target of formononetin.

The correlation of ESR1 genetic aberrations with estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor status in metastatic and primary estrogen receptor-positive breast carcinomas

INTRODUCTION

Genetic aberrations in the Estrogen Receptor 1 (ESR1) gene have been identified as an important mechanism of resistance to endocrine therapy in metastatic breast carcinoma. In this study, we aimed to correlate ESR1 genetic aberrations with the ER and PR status in paired metastatic and primary breast carcinomas.

METHODS

Patients with ER-positive breast cancer were divided into two groups: ESR1 genetic aberration (n=26) and wild-type control (n=29) based on genetic profiling of their metastatic tumors. Clinicopathological features and ER/PR status were analyzed in paired primary and metastatic tumors.

RESULTS

Although there was no significant difference in ER expression between the ESR1 aberration and control groups in primary tumors, ER positivity rate in metastatic tumors was significantly higher in the ESR1 aberration group than in the control group (100% vs. 86%, p<0.05). ESR1 aberrated cases were associated with more liver metastases than control tumors (46% vs. 10%, p<0.01). The ER percentage and intensity slightly increased from primary to metastatic tumors in the ESR1 aberration group compared to a decrease in both in the wild-type group (percentage increase 2% vs. decrease 19%, p=0.0594; intensity increase 0.04 vs. decrease 0.8, p<0.05). Patients with ESR1 aberrated metastases were more likely than those with wild-type ESR1 metastases to have the following characteristics: 1) ER percentage ≥ 90% and intensity >2, as well as PR percentage ≥ 30% and intensity >1 in metastatic tumors; 2) ER percentage ≥ 90% and PR percentage ≥ 70% in primary tumors; and 3) slightly increase in ER percentage and intensity from primary to metastatic tumors.

CONCLUSION

Based on the ER/PR parameters of paired primary and metastatic breast cancer, ESR1 aberration in metastasis may be predicted.

Disruption of estrogen receptor beta's DNA binding domain impairs its tumor suppressive effects in triple negative breast cancer

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive sub-type of the disease which accounts for a disproportionately high percentage of breast cancer morbidities and mortalities. For these reasons, a better understanding of TNBC biology is required and the development of novel therapeutic approaches are critically needed. Estrogen receptor beta (ERβ) is a reported tumor suppressor that is expressed in approximately 20% of primary TNBC tumors, where it is associated with favorable prognostic features and patient outcomes. Previous studies have shown that ERβ mediates the assembly of co-repressor complexes on DNA to inhibit the expression of multiple growth promoting genes and to suppress the ability of oncogenic transcription factors to drive cancer progression. To further elucidate the molecular mechanisms by which ERβ elicits its anti-cancer effects, we developed MDA-MB-231 cells that inducibly express a mutant form of ERβ incapable of directly binding DNA. We demonstrate that disruption of ERβ's direct interaction with DNA abolishes its ability to regulate the expression of well characterized immediate response genes and renders it unable to suppress TNBC cell proliferation. Loss of DNA binding also diminishes the ability of ERβ to suppress oncogenic NFκB signaling even though it still physically associates with NFκB and other critical co-factors. These findings enhance our understanding of how ERβ functions in this disease and provide a model system that can be utilized to further investigate the mechanistic processes by which ERβ elicits its anti-cancer effects.

Estrogen receptor α K303R mutation reorganizes its binding to forkhead box protein A1 regions and induces chromatin opening

BACKGROUND

Estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) is a frequently mutated gene in breast cancer (BC). While many studies have investigated molecular dysregulation by hotspot mutations at Y537 and D538, which exhibit an estrogen-independent constitutively active phenotype, the functional abnormalities of other mutations remain obscure. The K303R mutation in primary invasive BC has been implicated with endocrine resistance, tumor size, and lymph node positivity. However, the impact of the K303R mutation on the cell epigenome is yet unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We introduced the K303R ERα mutant in ERα-negative MDA-MB-453 cells to monitor ERα-dependent transactivation and to perform epigenomic analyses. ATAC-seq and ChIP-Seq analyses indicated that both wild-type (WT) and the K303R mutant associated with Forkhead box (Fox) protein family motif regions at similar rates, even without an ERα-binding sequence, but only the K303R mutant induced chromatin opening at those regions. Biochemical analyses demonstrated that the WT and the K303R mutant can be tethered on DNA by FoxA1 indirectly, but only the K303R/FoxA1/DNA complex can induce associations with the nuclear receptor cofactor 2 (NCOA2).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that the K303R mutant induces chromatin opening at the Fox binding region through the FoxA1-dependent associations of the K303R mutant to NCOA2 and then probably disrupts the regulation of Fox-target genes, resulting in K303R-related BC events.

Rosetta Stone for Cancer Cure: Comparison of the Anticancer Capacity of Endogenous Estrogens, Synthetic Estrogens and Antiestrogens

This work presents the history of the recognition of principal regulatory capacities of estrogen hormones having been mistakenly regarded as breast cancer promoting agents for more than 120 years. Comprehensive analysis of the results of clinical, epidemiological, immunological and molecular studies justified that endogenous estrogens are the principal regulators of embryonic development, survival and reproduction via orchestrating appropriate expression and even edition of all genes in mammalians. Medical use of chemically modified synthetic estrogens caused toxic complications; thromboembolic events and increased cancer risk in female organs as they proved to be endocrine disruptors deregulating estrogen receptors (ERs) rather than their activators. Synthetic estrogen treatment exhibits ambiguous correlations with cancer risk at different sites, which may be attributed to an inhibition of the unliganded activation of estrogen receptors (ERs) coupled with compensatory liganded activation. The principle of estrogen induced breast cancer led to the introduction of antiestrogen therapies against this tumor; inhibition of the liganded activation of estrogen receptors and aromatase enzyme activity. The initial enthusiasm turned into disappointment as the majority of breast cancers proved to be primarily resistant to antiestrogens. In addition, nearly all patients showing earlier good tumor responses to endocrine therapy, later experienced secondary resistance leading to metastatic disease and fatal outcome. Studying the molecular events in tumors responsive and unresponsive to antiestrogen therapy, it was illuminated that a complete inhibition of liganded ER activation stimulates the growth of cancers, while a successful compensatory upregulation of estrogen signal may achieve DNA restoration, tumor regression and patient's survival. Recognition of the principal role of endogenous estrogens in gene expression, gene edition and DNA repair, estrogen treatment and stimulation of ER expression in patients may bring about a great turn in medical practice.

ERα-LBD, an isoform of estrogen receptor alpha, promotes breast cancer proliferation and endocrine resistance

Estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) drives mammary gland development and breast cancer (BC) growth through an evolutionarily conserved linkage of DNA binding and hormone activation functions. Therapeutic targeting of the hormone binding pocket is a widely utilized and successful strategy for breast cancer prevention and treatment. However, resistance to this endocrine therapy is frequently encountered and may occur through bypass or reactivation of ER-regulated transcriptional programs. We now identify the induction of an ERα isoform, ERα-LBD, that is encoded by an alternative ESR1 transcript and lacks the activation function and DNA binding domains. Despite lacking the transcriptional activity, ERα-LBD is found to promote breast cancer growth and resistance to the ERα antagonist fulvestrant. ERα-LBD is predominantly localized to the cytoplasm and mitochondria of BC cells and leads to enhanced glycolysis, respiration and stem-like features. Intriguingly, ERα-LBD expression and function does not appear to be restricted to cancers that express full length ERα but also promotes growth of triple-negative breast cancers and ERα-LBD transcript (ESR1-LBD) is also present in BC samples from both ERα(+) and ERα(-) human tumors. These findings point to ERα-LBD as a potential mediator of breast cancer progression and therapy resistance.

Clinically relevant CHK1 inhibitors abrogate wild-type and Y537S mutant ERα expression and proliferation in luminal primary and metastatic breast cancer cells

BACKGROUND

Challenges exist in the clinical treatment of luminal estrogen receptor α (ERα)-positive breast cancers (BCs) both to prevent resistance to endocrine therapy (ET) and to treat ET-resistant metastatic BCs (MBC). Therefore, we evaluated if kinases could be new targets for the treatment of luminal primary and MBCs.

METHODS

 ~ 170 kinase inhibitors were applied to MCF-7 cells either with adaptative or genetic resistance to ET drugs and both ERα levels and cell proliferation were measured. Robust-Z-score calculation identified AZD7762 (CHK1/CHK2 inhibitor) as a positive hit. Subsequently, Kaplan-Meier analyses of CHK1 and CHK2 impact on ERα-positive BC patients relapse-free-survival (RFS), bioinformatic evaluations of CHK1 and CHK2 expression and activation status as a function of ERα activation status as well as drug sensitivity studies in ERα-positive BC cell lines, validation of the impact of the ATR:CHK1 and ATM:CHK2 pathways on the control of ERα stability and BC cell proliferation via inhibitor- and siRNA-based approaches, identification of the molecular mechanism required for inhibitor-dependent ERα degradation in BC and the impact of CHK1 and CHK2 inhibition on the 17β-estradiol (E2):ERα signaling, synergy proliferation studies between ET-drugs and clinically relevant CHK1 inhibitors in different luminal BC cell lines, were performed.

RESULTS

A reduced CHK1 expression correlates with a longer RFS in women with ERα-positive BCs. Interestingly, women carrying luminal A BC display an extended RFS when expressing low CHK1 levels. Accordingly, CHK1 and ERα activations are correlated in ERα-positive BC cell lines, and the ATR:CHK1 pathway controls ERα stability and cell proliferation in luminal A BC cells. Mechanistically, the generation of DNA replication stress rather than DNA damage induced by ATR:CHK1 pathway inhibition is a prerequisite for ERα degradation. Furthermore, CHK1 inhibition interferes with E2:ERα signaling to cell proliferation, and drugs approved for clinical treatment of primary and MBC (4OH-tamoxifen and the CDK4/CDK6 inhibitors abemaciclib and palbociclib) exert synergic effects with the CHK1 inhibitors in clinical trials for the treatment of solid tumors (AZD7762, MK8776, prexasertib) in preventing the proliferation of cells modeling primary and MBC.

CONCLUSIONS

CHK1 could be considered as an appealing novel pharmacological target for the treatment of luminal primary and MBCs.

The prognostic and predictive value of ESR1 fusion gene transcripts in primary breast cancer

Background

In breast cancer (BC), recurrent fusion genes of estrogen receptor alpha (ESR1) and AKAP12, ARMT1 and CCDC170 have been reported. In these gene fusions the ligand binding domain of ESR1 has been replaced by the transactivation domain of the fusion partner constitutively activating the receptor. As a result, these gene fusions can drive tumor growth hormone independently as been shown in preclinical models, but the clinical value of these fusions have not been reported. Here, we studied the prognostic and predictive value of different frequently reported ESR1 fusion transcripts in primary BC.

Methods

We evaluated 732 patients with primary BC (131 ESR1-negative and 601 ESR1-positive cases), including two ER-positive BC patient cohorts: one cohort of 322 patients with advanced disease who received first-line endocrine therapy (ET) (predictive cohort), and a second cohort of 279 patients with lymph node negative disease (LNN) who received no adjuvant systemic treatment (prognostic cohort). Fusion gene transcript levels were measured by reverse transcriptase quantitative PCR. The presence of the different fusion transcripts was associated, in uni- and multivariable Cox regression analysis taking along current clinico-pathological characteristics, to progression free survival (PFS) during first-line endocrine therapy in the predictive cohort, and disease- free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in the prognostic cohort.

Results

The ESR1-CCDC170 fusion transcript was present in 27.6% of the ESR1-positive BC subjects and in 2.3% of the ESR1-negative cases. In the predictive cohort, none of the fusion transcripts were associated with response to first-line ET. In the prognostic cohort, the median DFS and OS were respectively 37 and 93 months for patients with an ESR1-CCDC170 exon 8 gene fusion transcript and respectively 91 and 212 months for patients without this fusion transcript. In a multivariable analysis, this ESR1-CCDC170 fusion transcript was an independent prognostic factor for DFS (HR) (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.8 (1.2–2.8), P = 0.005) and OS (HR (95% CI: 1.7 (1.1–2.7), P = 0.023).

Conclusions

Our study shows that in primary BC only ESR1-CCDC170 exon 8 gene fusion transcript carries prognostic value. None of the ESR1 fusion transcripts, which are considered to have constitutive ER activity, was predictive for outcome in BC with advanced disease treated with endocrine treatment.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09265-1.

Estrogen Receptor Bio-Activities Determine Clinical Endocrine Treatment Options in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer

In estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer therapy, estrogen receptors (ERs) are the major targeting molecules. ER-targeted therapy has provided clinical benefits for approximately 70% of all breast cancer patients through targeting the ERα subtype. In recent years, mechanisms underlying breast cancer occurrence and progression have been extensively studied and largely clarified. The PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway, microRNA regulation, and other ER downstream signaling pathways are found to be the effective therapeutic targets in ER+ BC therapy. A number of the ER+ (ER+) breast cancer biomarkers have been established for diagnosis and prognosis. The ESR1 gene mutations that lead to endocrine therapy resistance in ER+ breast cancer had been identified. Mutations in the ligand-binding domain of ERα which encoded by ESR1 gene occur in most cases. The targeted drugs combined with endocrine therapy have been developed to improve the therapeutic efficacy of ER+ breast cancer, particularly the endocrine therapy resistance ER+ breast cancer. The combination therapy has been demonstrated to be superior to monotherapy in overall clinical evaluation. In this review, we focus on recent progress in studies on ERs and related clinical applications for targeted therapy and provide a perspective view for therapy of ER+ breast cancer.

The race to develop oral SERDs and other novel estrogen receptor inhibitors: recent clinical trial results and impact on treatment options

Hormonal therapy plays a vital part in the treatment of estrogen receptor-positive (ER +) breast cancer. ER can be activated in a ligand-dependent and independent manner. Currently available ER-targeting agents include selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs), and aromatase inhibitors (AIs). Estrogen receptor mutation (ESR1 mutation) is one of the common mechanisms by which breast cancer becomes resistant to additional therapies from SERMs or AIs. These tumors remain sensitive to SERDs such as fulvestrant. Fulvestrant is limited in clinical utilization by its intramuscular formulation and once-monthly injection in large volumes. Oral SERDs are being rapidly developed to replace fulvestrant with the potential of higher efficacy and lower toxicities. Elacestrant is the first oral SERD that went through a randomized phase III trial showing increased efficacy, especially in tumors bearing ESR1 mutation, and good tolerability. Two other oral SERDs recently failed to achieve the primary endpoints of longer progression-free survival (PFS). They targeted tumors previously treated with several lines of prior therapies untested for ESR1 mutation. Initial clinical trial data demonstrated that tumors without the ESR1 mutation are less likely to benefit from the SERDs and may still respond to SERMs or AIs, including tumors previously exposed to hormonal therapy. Testing for ESR1 mutation in ongoing clinical trials and in hormonal therapy for breast cancer is highly recommended. Novel protein degradation technologies such as proteolysis-targeting chimera (PROTACS), molecular glue degrader (MGD), and lysosome-targeting chimeras (LYTACS) may result in more efficient ER degradation, while ribonuclease-targeting chimeras (RIBOTAC) and small interfering RNA (siRNA) may inhibit the production of ER protein.

Ribociclib Induces Broad Chemotherapy Resistance and EGFR Dependency in ESR1 Wildtype and Mutant Breast Cancer

While endocrine therapy is highly effective for the treatment of oestrogen receptor-α (ERα)-positive breast cancer, a significant number of patients will eventually experience disease progression and develop treatment-resistant, metastatic cancer. The majority of resistant tumours remain dependent on ERα-action, with activating ESR1 gene mutations occurring in 15-40% of advanced cancers. Therefore, there is an urgent need to discover novel effective therapies that can eradicate cancer cells with aberrant ERα and to understand the cellular response underlying their action. Here, we evaluate the response of MCF7-derived, CRISPR-Cas9-generated cell lines expressing mutant ERα (Y537S) to a large number of drugs. We report sensitivity to numerous clinically approved inhibitors, including CDK4/6 inhibitor ribociclib, which is a standard-of-care therapy in the treatment of metastatic ERα-positive breast cancer and currently under evaluation in the neoadjuvant setting. Ribociclib treatment induces senescence in both wildtype and mutant ERα breast cancer models and leads to a broad-range drug tolerance. Strikingly, viability of cells undergoing ribociclib-induced cellular senescence is maintained via engagement of EGFR signalling, which may be therapeutically exploited in both wildtype and mutant ERα-positive breast cancer. Our study highlights a wide-spread reduction in sensitivity to anti-cancer drugs accompanied with an acquired vulnerability to EGFR inhibitors following CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment.

Estrogen receptor-α signaling in post-natal mammary development and breast cancers

17β-estradiol controls post-natal mammary gland development and exerts its effects through Estrogen Receptor ERα, a member of the nuclear receptor family. ERα is also critical for breast cancer progression and remains a central therapeutic target for hormone-dependent breast cancers. In this review, we summarize the current understanding of the complex ERα signaling pathways that involve either classical nuclear “genomic” or membrane “non-genomic” actions and regulate in concert with other hormones the different stages of mammary development. We describe the cellular and molecular features of the luminal cell lineage expressing ERα and provide an overview of the transgenic mouse models impacting ERα signaling, highlighting the pivotal role of ERα in mammary gland morphogenesis and function and its implication in the tumorigenic processes. Finally, we describe the main features of the ERα-positive luminal breast cancers and their modeling in mice.

Long Noncoding RNA LINC00899/miR-944/ESR1 Axis Regulates Cervical Cancer Cell Proliferation, Migration, and Invasion

Cervical cancer (CC) is a common malignancy in women. Long noncoding RNA LINC00899 plays a role in cancer, but its effects in CC are unknown. Our experiment aims to investigate the specific effects of LINC00899 in CC. LINC00899 was lowly expressed in CC tissues and cells, and overexpressed LINC0089 inhibited the viability, proliferation, migration, and invasion of CC cells, whereas silencing of LINC00899 had the opposite effect. There is a targeting relationship between LINC0089 and miR-944. It was found that miR-944 could competitively bind with LINC00899, and LINC00899 in turn, could downregulate expression of miR-944. Moreover, estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) was the target gene of miR-944. Overexpressed miR-944 inhibited ESR1 expression, yet enhanced the migration and invasion of CC cells and promoted the expression levels of N-cadherin and Vimentin while inhibiting the expression of E-cadherin. However, overexpressed ESR1 reversed the effect of miR-944 overexpression on CC cells. LINC00899/miR-944/ESR1 axis regulates the proliferation, migration, and invasion of CC cells by regulating the expression levels of related proteins.

Which Is the Most Appropriate PI3K Inhibitor for Breast Cancer Patients with or without PIK3CA Status Mutant? A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Objective

The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) signaling pathway is a promising treatment target for patients with breast cancer (BC). Our study aimed to evaluate the most effective and safe PI3K inhibitor for patients with BC, especially in PIK3CA mutation.

Methods

Electronics databases were systematically searched from their inception to June 2020 for published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PI3K inhibitor therapy versus non-PI3K inhibitor therapy in patients with BC that mentioned or reported data of PIK3CA-mutated patient subgroups. Eligible RCTs had to report at least one of the following clinical outcomes: objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), or adverse events (AE).

Results

Nine eligible RCTs involving 3872 BC patients and four PI3K inhibitor therapy arms (i.e., alpelisib, buparlisib, pictilisib, and taselisib) were included. In evaluating ORR, beneficial significant results of PI3K inhibitors could be found in the PIK3CA mutated group (1.952, 1.012 to 3.766); analogous results could also be found in 6m-PFS (1.519, 1.144 to 2.018) and PFS from HR data (-0.346, -0.525 to -0.168). From pairwise and network meta-analyses, buparlisib showed the most favorable ORR, as it was significantly different from fulvestrant in the PIK3CA-mutated patient group (2.80, 1.56 to 5.03). Alpelisib ranked first in the assessment of 6m-PFS and was significantly different from fulvestrant in the PIK3CA-mutated group (2.33, 1.45 to 3.44). The above PI3K inhibitors had good safety with few serious AEs. PROSPERO registration CRD42020193932.

Conclusion

The PI3K inhibitors alpelisib and buparlisib appear to have superior efficacy and safety therapeutic choices for patients with BC, especially in PIK3CA-mutated patients.

Currently Applied Molecular Assays for Identifying ESR1 Mutations in Patients with Advanced Breast Cancer

Approximately 70% of breast cancers, the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, are positive for the estrogen receptor (ER). Treatment of patients with luminal subtypes is mainly based on endocrine therapy. However, ER positivity is reduced and ESR1 mutations play an important role in resistance to endocrine therapy, leading to advanced breast cancer. Various methodologies for the detection of ESR1 mutations have been developed, and the most commonly used method is next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based assays (50.0%) followed by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) (45.5%). Regarding the sample type, tissue (50.0%) was more frequently used than plasma (27.3%). However, plasma (46.2%) became the most used method in 2016-2019, in contrast to 2012-2015 (22.2%). In 2016-2019, ddPCR (61.5%), rather than NGS (30.8%), became a more popular method than it was in 2012-2015. The easy accessibility, non-invasiveness, and demonstrated usefulness with high sensitivity of ddPCR using plasma have changed the trends. When using these assays, there should be a comprehensive understanding of the principles, advantages, vulnerability, and precautions for interpretation. In the future, advanced NGS platforms and modified ddPCR will benefit patients by facilitating treatment decisions efficiently based on information regarding ESR1 mutations.

Rapid Induction of the Unfolded Protein Response and Apoptosis by Estrogen Mimic TTC-352 for the Treatment of Endocrine-Resistant Breast Cancer

Patients with long-term estrogen-deprived breast cancer, after resistance to tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors develops, can experience tumor regression when treated with estrogens. Estrogen's antitumor effect is attributed to apoptosis via the estrogen receptor (ER). Estrogen treatment can have unpleasant gynecologic and nongynecologic adverse events; thus, the development of safer estrogenic agents remains a clinical priority. Here, we study synthetic selective estrogen mimics (SEM) BMI-135 and TTC-352, and the naturally occurring estrogen estetrol (E₄), which are proposed as safer estrogenic agents compared with 17β-estradiol (E₂), for the treatment of endocrine-resistant breast cancer. TTC-352 and E₄ are being evaluated in breast cancer clinical trials. Cell viability assays, real-time PCR, immunoblotting, ERE DNA pulldowns, mass spectrometry, X-ray crystallography, docking and molecular dynamic simulations, live cell imaging, and Annexin V staining were conducted in 11 biologically different breast cancer models. Results were compared with the potent full agonist E₂, less potent full agonist E₄, the benchmark partial agonist triphenylethylene bisphenol (BPTPE), and antagonists 4-hydroxytamoxifen and endoxifen. We report ERα's regulation and coregulators' binding profiles with SEMs and E₄ We describe TTC-352's pharmacology as a weak full agonist and antitumor molecular mechanisms. This study highlights TTC-352's benzothiophene scaffold that yields an H-bond with Glu353, which allows Asp351-to-helix 12 (H12) interaction, sealing ERα's ligand-binding domain, recruiting E₂-enriched coactivators, and triggering rapid ERα-induced unfolded protein response (UPR) and apoptosis, as the basis of its anticancer properties. BPTPE's phenolic OH yields an H-Bond with Thr347, which disrupts Asp351-to-H12 interaction, delaying UPR and apoptosis and increasing clonal evolution risk.

Compensatory Estrogen Signal Is Capable of DNA Repair in Antiestrogen-Responsive Cancer Cells via Activating Mutations

Cancer cells are embarrassed human cells exhibiting the remnants of same mechanisms for DNA stabilization like patients have in their healthy cells. Antiestrogens target the liganded activation of ERs, which is the principal means of genomic regulation in both patients and their tumors. The artificial blockade of liganded ER activation is an emergency situation promoting strong compensatory actions even in cancer cells. When tumor cells are capable of an appropriate upregulation of ER signaling resulting in DNA repair, a tumor response may be detected. In contrast, when ER signaling is completely inhibited, tumor cells show unrestrained proliferation, and tumor growth may be observed. The laboratory investigations of genomic mechanisms in antiestrogen-responsive and antiestrogen-unresponsive tumor cells have considerably enhanced our knowledge regarding the principal regulatory capacity of estrogen signaling. In antiestrogen-responsive tumor cells, a compensatory increased expression and liganded activation of estrogen receptors (ERs) result in an apoptotic death. Conversely, in antiestrogen resistant tumors exhibiting a complete blockade of liganded ER activation, a compensatory effort for unliganded ER activation is characteristic, conferred by the increased expression and activity of growth factor receptors. However, even extreme unliganded ER activation is incapable of DNA restoration when the liganded ER activation is completely blocked. Researchers mistakenly suspect even today that in tumors growing under antiestrogen treatment, the increased unliganded activation of estrogen receptor via activating mutations is an aggressive survival technique, whilst it is a compensatory effort against the blockade of liganded ER activation. The capacity of liganded ERs for genome modification in emergency states provides possibilities for estrogen/ER use in medical practice including cancer cure.

Endocrine therapy resistance: new insights

The estrogen receptor positive (ER+) subset is the dominant contributor to global deaths from breast cancer which now exceeds 500,000 deaths annually. Lethality is driven by endocrine resistance, which has been shown to be associated with high mutational rates and extreme subclonal diversity. Treatment forces subclonal selection until the patient eventually succumbs to metastatic treatment-resistant disease. Recently, we have been addressing several questions related to this process: What is the cause of the increased mutation rate in lethal ER+ breast cancer? Why is endocrine therapy resistance related to mutational load? What are the functions of the somatic mutations that are eventually selected in the treatment resistant and metastatic clones? These questions have provoked new mechanistic hypotheses that link resistance to endocrine agents to: (1) Specific defects in single strand break repair are associated with increased mortality from ER+ breast cancer [1,2]; (2) Loss/mutations of certain single strand break repair proteins that disrupt estrogen-regulated cell cycle control through the ATM, CHK2, CDK4 axis [1,2] thereby directly coupling endocrine therapy resistance to specific DNA repair defects; (3) Acquired mutations that drive metastasis include the generation of in-frame ESR1 gene fusions that activate epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) driven metastasis as well as endocrine drug-resistant proliferation [3].

TFmiR2: constructing and analyzing disease-, tissue- and process-specific transcription factor and microRNA co-regulatory networks

SUMMARY

TFmiR2 is a freely available web server for constructing and analyzing integrated transcription factor (TF) and microRNA (miRNA) co-regulatory networks for human and mouse. TFmiR2 generates tissue- and biological process-specific networks for the set of deregulated genes and miRNAs provided by the user. Furthermore, the service can now identify key driver genes and miRNAs in the constructed networks by utilizing the graph theoretical concept of a minimum connected dominating set. These putative key players as well as the newly implemented four-node TF-miRNA motifs yield novel insights that may assist in developing new therapeutic approaches.

AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION

The TFmiR2 web server is available at http://service.bioinformatik.uni-saarland.de/tfmir2.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Network hub-node prioritization of gene regulation with intra-network association

Background

To identify and prioritize the influential hub genes in a gene-set or biological pathway, most analyses rely on calculation of marginal effects or tests of statistical significance. These procedures may be inappropriate since hub nodes are common connection points and therefore may interact with other nodes more often than non-hub nodes do. Such dependence among gene nodes can be conjectured based on the topology of the pathway network or the correlation between them.

Results

Here we develop a pathway activity score incorporating the marginal (local) effects of gene nodes as well as intra-network affinity measures. This score summarizes the expression levels in a gene-set/pathway for each sample, with weights on local and network information, respectively. The score is next used to examine the impact of each node through a leave-one-out evaluation. To illustrate the procedure, two cancer studies, one involving RNA-Seq from breast cancer patients with high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ and one microarray expression data from ovarian cancer patients, are used to assess the performance of the procedure, and to compare with existing methods, both ones that do and do not take into consideration correlation and network information. The hub nodes identified by the proposed procedure in the two cancer studies are known influential genes; some have been included in standard treatments and some are currently considered in clinical trials for target therapy. The results from simulation studies show that when marginal effects are mild or weak, the proposed procedure can still identify causal nodes, whereas methods relying only on marginal effect size cannot.

Conclusions

The NetworkHub procedure proposed in this research can effectively utilize the network information in combination with local effects derived from marker values, and provide a useful and complementary list of recommendations for prioritizing causal hubs.

Estrogen-induced transcription at individual alleles is independent of receptor level and active conformation but can be modulated by coactivators activity

Steroid hormones are pivotal modulators of pathophysiological processes in many organs, where they interact with nuclear receptors to regulate gene transcription. However, our understanding of hormone action at the single cell level remains incomplete. Here, we focused on estrogen stimulation of the well-characterized GREB1 and MYC target genes that revealed large differences in cell-by-cell responses, and, more interestingly, between alleles within the same cell, both over time and hormone concentration. We specifically analyzed the role of receptor level and activity state during allele-by-allele regulation and found that neither receptor level nor activation status are the determinant of maximal hormonal response, indicating that additional pathways are potentially in place to modulate cell- and allele-specific responses. Interestingly, we found that a small molecule inhibitor of the arginine methyltransferases CARM1 and PRMT6 was able to increase, in a gene specific manner, the number of active alleles/cell before and after hormonal stimulation, suggesting that mechanisms do indeed exist to modulate hormone receptor responses at the single cell and allele level.

Functional Annotation of ESR1 Gene Fusions in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer

RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) detects estrogen receptor alpha gene (ESR1) fusion transcripts in estrogen receptor-positive (ER⁺) breast cancer, but their role in disease pathogenesis remains unclear. We examined multiple ESR1 fusions and found that two, both identified in advanced endocrine treatment-resistant disease, encoded stable and functional fusion proteins. In both examples, ESR1-e6>YAP1 and ESR1-e6>PCDH11X, ESR1 exons 1-6 were fused in frame to C-terminal sequences from the partner gene. Functional properties include estrogen-independent growth, constitutive expression of ER target genes, and anti-estrogen resistance. Both fusions activate a metastasis-associated transcriptional program, induce cellular motility, and promote the development of lung metastasis. ESR1-e6>YAP1- and ESR1-e6>PCDH11X-induced growth remained sensitive to a CDK4/6 inhibitor, and a patient-derived xenograft (PDX) naturally expressing the ESR1-e6>YAP1 fusion was also responsive. Transcriptionally active ESR1 fusions therefore trigger both endocrine therapy resistance and metastatic progression, explaining the association with fatal disease progression, although CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment is predicted to be effective.

Topology Consistency of Disease-specific Differential Co-regulatory Networks

Background

Sets of differentially expressed genes often contain driver genes that induce disease processes. However, various methods for identifying differentially expressed genes yield quite different results. Thus, we investigated whether this affects the identification of key players in regulatory networks derived by downstream analysis from lists of differentially expressed genes.

Results

While the overlap between the sets of significant differentially expressed genes determined by DESeq, edgeR, voom and VST was only 26% in liver hepatocellular carcinoma and 28% in breast invasive carcinoma, the topologies of the regulatory networks constructed using the TFmiR webserver for the different sets of differentially expressed genes were found to be highly consistent with respect to hub-degree nodes, minimum dominating set and minimum connected dominating set.

Conclusions

The findings suggest that key genes identified in regulatory networks derived by systematic analysis of differentially expressed genes may be a more robust basis for understanding diseases processes than simply inspecting the lists of differentially expressed genes.

PHLPP1 counter-regulates STAT1-mediated inflammatory signaling

Inflammation is an essential aspect of innate immunity but also contributes to diverse human diseases. Although much is known about the kinases that control inflammatory signaling, less is known about the opposing phosphatases. Here we report that deletion of the gene encoding PH domain Leucine-rich repeat Protein Phosphatase 1 (PHLPP1) protects mice from lethal lipopolysaccharide (LPS) challenge and live Escherichia coli infection. Investigation of PHLPP1 function in macrophages reveals that it controls the magnitude and duration of inflammatory signaling by dephosphorylating the transcription factor STAT1 on Ser727 to inhibit its activity, reduce its promoter residency, and reduce the expression of target genes involved in innate immunity and cytokine signaling. This previously undescribed function of PHLPP1 depends on a bipartite nuclear localization signal in its unique N-terminal extension. Our data support a model in which nuclear PHLPP1 dephosphorylates STAT1 to control the magnitude and duration of inflammatory signaling in macrophages.

The Central Contributions of Breast Cancer Stem Cells in Developing Resistance to Endocrine Therapy in Estrogen Receptor (ER)-Positive Breast Cancer

Breast cancer stem cells (BCSC) play critical roles in the acquisition of resistance to endocrine therapy in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive (ER + ve) breast cancer (BC). The resistance results from complex alterations involving ER, growth factor receptors, NOTCH, Wnt/β-catenin, hedgehog, YAP/TAZ, and the tumor microenvironment. These mechanisms are likely converged on regulating BCSCs, which then drive the development of endocrine therapy resistance. In this regard, hormone therapies enrich BCSCs in ER + ve BCs under both pre-clinical and clinical settings along with upregulation of the core components of “stemness” transcriptional factors including SOX2, NANOG, and OCT4. SOX2 initiates a set of reactions involving SOX9, Wnt, FXY3D, and Src tyrosine kinase; these reactions stimulate BCSCs and contribute to endocrine resistance. The central contributions of BCSCs to endocrine resistance regulated by complex mechanisms offer a unified strategy to counter the resistance. ER + ve BCs constitute approximately 75% of BCs to which hormone therapy is the major therapeutic approach. Likewise, resistance to endocrine therapy remains the major challenge in the management of patients with ER + ve BC. In this review we will discuss evidence supporting a central role of BCSCs in developing endocrine resistance and outline the strategy of targeting BCSCs to reduce hormone therapy resistance.

ESR1 mutations: a new biomarker in breast cancer

Introduction: In hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, ESR1 mutations have emerged as a key mechanism of resistance to endocrine therapy. Areas covered: Here, we review currently available data on ESR1 mutations, regarding their functional impact, prevalence at different stages (and according to the material used: tissue-based analysis vs. liquid biopsy), prognostic impact and predictive value of resistance to aromatase inhibitors. Possible strategies to overcome this resistance by using selective estrogen receptor downregulators (such as fulvestrant) are also discussed. Expert opinion: ESR1 mutation detection will probably become a prognostic and predictive biomarker in the future, used in clinical practice for hormone-receptor breast cancer, especially in the metastatic setting. In the future, we should expect to assess ESR1 mutations, using liquid biopsy (by digital-PCR or next-generation sequencing), in the same way as other prognostic or predictive biomarkers, such as EGFR mutations in lung cancer, and possibly even have targeted-therapies against these mutations.

ESR1 alterations and metastasis in estrogen receptor positive breast cancer

Endocrine therapy is essential for the treatment of patients with estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer, however, resistance and the development of metastatic disease is common. Understanding how ER+ breast cancer metastasizes is critical since the major cause of death in breast cancer is metastasis to distant organs. Results from many studies suggest dysregulation of the estrogen receptor alpha gene (ESR1 ) contributes to therapeutic resistance and metastatic biology. This review covers both pre-clinical and clinical evidence on the spectrum of ESR1 alterations including amplification, point mutations, and genomic rearrangement events driving treatment resistance and metastatic potential of ER+ breast cancer. Importantly, we describe how these ESR1 alterations may provide therapeutic opportunities to improve outcomes in patients with lethal, metastatic breast cancer.

Strategies to degrade estrogen receptor α in primary and ESR1 mutant-expressing metastatic breast cancer

With the advent of omic technologies, our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying estrogen receptor α (ERα)-expressing breast cancer (BC) progression has grown exponentially. Nevertheless, the most widely used therapy for inhibiting this disease is endocrine therapy (ET) (i.e., aromatase inhibitors, tamoxifen - Tam, faslodex/fulvestrant - FUL). However, in a considerable number of cases, prolonged patient treatment with ET generates the development of resistant tumor cells and, consequently, tumor relapse, which manifests as metastatic disease that is extremely difficult to manage, especially because such metastatic BCs (MBCs) often express ERα mutations (e.g., Y537S, D538G) that confer pronounced growth advantages to tumor cells. Interestingly, ET continues to be the therapy of choice for this neoplasia, which underscores the need to identify novel drugs that could work in primary and MBCs. In this study, we review the approaches that have been undertaken to discover these new anti-ERα compounds, especially considering those focused on evaluating ERα degradation. A literature analysis demonstrated that current strategies for discovering new anti-BC drugs are focusing on the identification either of novel ERα inhibitors, of compounds that inhibit ERα-related pathways or of drugs that influence ERα-unrelated cellular pathways. Several lines of evidence suggest that all of these molecules alter the ERα content and block the proliferation of both primary and MBCs. In turn, we propose to rationalize all these discoveries into the definition of e.m.eral.d.s (i.e., selective modulators of ERα levels and degradation) as a novel supercategory of anti-ERα drugs that function both as modulators of ERα levels and inhibitors of BC cell proliferation.

ESR1 fusions drive endocrine therapy resistance and metastasis in breast cancer

Estrogen receptor alpha gene (ESR1) fusion transcripts have been identified in breast cancer but their role in breast cancer is not completely understood. Here, we report a causal role for ESR1 fusions in driving both endocrine therapy resistance and metastasis, and describe a therapeutic strategy to target ESR1 fusion-induced growth.

Estrogen Receptors: New Directions in the New Millennium

Nineteen years have passed since our previous review in this journal in 1999 regarding estrogen receptors. At that time, we described the current assessments of the physiological activities of estrogen and estrogen receptors. Since that time there has been an explosion of progress in our understanding of details of estrogen receptor-mediated processes from the molecular and cellular level to the whole organism. In this review we discuss the basic understanding of estrogen signaling and then elaborate on the progress and current understanding of estrogen receptor actions that have developed using new models and continuing clinical studies.