Long-term effects of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a monocentric prospective study with minimum follow-up of 5 years

Conversion of Sleeve Gastrectomy to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Is Intrathoracic Migration of the Sleeve of High Incidence?

BACKGROUND

Conversion of SG to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is increasing. Intrathoracic migration of the sleeve (ITM) often seems associated and is increasingly reported.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients who underwent a conversion of SG to RYGB from August 2013 to December 2022 were included. Two groups were compared: patients operated on for weight loss failure (WLF gp) and those operated on for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD gp). Demographic data, the incidence of ITM, weight loss outcomes, resolution of symptoms, and morbidity were analyzed.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients were included with an average follow-up of 32 months: 46 patients in the GERD gp (78%) were compared to 13 patients (22%) in the WLF gp. Groups were comparable regarding age and gender, but BMI and commodities were significantly higher in the WLF gp. In the GERD gp, on preoperative gastroscopy, 30% had a esophagitis, 48% had an ITM which required a posterior crural closure versus no esophagitis (p=0.02) and 23% of ITM in the WLF gp (p=0.11). Conversion led to 93% of GERD symptom improvement. In the WLF gp, mean TWL% was 15.3%, significantly greater than in the GERD gp (TWL% = 4.6%, p = 0.01). The complication rate was 10% at 30 days and 3.4% after 30 days, not significantly different between groups.

CONCLUSION

The main indication of conversion of SG to RYGB was because of GERD: in these indications, the incidence of ITM was high requiring a surgical treatment with a very good efficacy on symptoms. Weight loss results were disappointing.

Evaluation of the effect of sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in patients with morbid obesity: multicenter comparative study

INTRODUCTION

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) are the two most performed techniques in bariatric surgery. The aim of this study is to compare two surgical procedures in terms of weight loss and the development of comorbidities such as type II diabetes mellitus T2D, arterial hypertension, sleep apnea (OSAS), and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

METHODS

Data from the German Bariatric Surgery Registry (GBSR) from 2005 to 2021 were used. 1,392 RYGB and 1,132 SG primary surgery patients were included. Minimum age 18 years; five-year follow-up data available. Tests were performed with a 5% significance level.

RESULTS

Loss of follow-up 95.41% within five years. Five years after surgery, the RYGB showed significant advantages in terms of excess weight loss (%EWL 64.2% vs. 56.9%) and remission rates of the studied comorbidities: hypertension (54.4% vs. 47.8%), OSAS (64.5% vs. 50.1%), and GERD (86.1% vs. 66.9%). Compared to the pre-test, individuals diagnosed with insulin-dependent T2D showed significant improvements with RYGB over a five-year period (remission rate: 75% vs. 63%). In contrast, non-insulin-dependent T2D showed no significant difference between the two approaches (p = 0.125).

CONCLUSION

Both surgical procedures resulted in significant weight loss and improved comorbidities. However, the improvement in comorbidities was significantly greater in patients who underwent RYGB than in those who underwent SG, suggesting that the RYGB technique is preferable. Nevertheless, RYGB requires a high degree of surgical skill. Therefore, acquiring expertise in the technical facets of the surgery is essential to achieving favorable outcomes.

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Effects of Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy on Dyslipidemia

The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the effects of LRYGB and LSG on dyslipidemia. Studies comparing the effects of LRYGB and LSG on dyslipidemia with follow-up of 12 months or more were included. Twenty-four studies comprising seven RCTs and 17 comparative observational studies were included. Meta-analysis of RCTs (n=487) showed that improvement/resolution of dyslipidemia was better after LRYGB (68.5%, n=161/235) compared to LSG (48.4%, n=122/252). Patients undergoing LRYGB were more than twice as likely to experience improvement/resolution in dyslipidemia compared to those undergoing LSG (OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.21-4.29, p=0.010). Both LRGYB and LSG appears effective in improving dyslipidemia at >12 months after surgery; however, this improvement is more than twice higher after LRYGB compared to LSG.

LAPAROSCOPIC SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC ROUX-EN-Y GASTRIC BYPASS FOR WEIGHT LOSS IN OBESE PATIENTS: WHICH IS MORE EFFECTIVE? A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

BACKGROUND

Bariatric surgery is the most effective option to reduce weight in morbid obesity patients. The techniques most employed are the restrictive surgery laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), surgical procedures of intestinal malabsorption, and both types (restrictive and intestinal malabsorption) such as the Roux-en-Y laparoscopic gastric bypass (RYLGB).

AIMS

To determine if LSG is more effective than RYLGB for weight loss.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out, including five clinical trials and sixteen cohorts comparing LSG versus RYLGB in weight loss and secondary outcomes: resolution of comorbidities, postoperative complications, operative time, hospital stay, and improvement in quality of life.

RESULTS

Excess weight loss was 10.2% (mean difference [MD] 10.2; 95%CI -10.14; -9.90) higher in patients undergoing LSG than in patients submitted to RYLGB. Diabetes mellitus type 2 was resolved in 17% (relative risk [RR] 0.83; 95%CI 0.77-0.90) of cases, more significantly after LSG, arterial hypertension in 23% (RR 0.77; 95%CI 0.69-0.84), and dyslipidemia in 17% (RR 0.83; 95%CI 0.77-0.90). Postoperative complications were 73% higher in patients undergoing RYLGB (MD 0.73; 95%CI 0.63-0.83). The operative time was 35.76 minutes shorter in the LSG (MD -35.76; 95%CI -37.28; -34.24). Finally, the quality of life improved more in patients operated by LSG (MD 0.37; 95%CI -0.48; -0.26).

CONCLUSIONS

The study demonstrated that LSG could be more effective than RYLGB in reducing the percentage of excess weight, comorbidities, postoperative complications, operative time, hospital stay, and in improving quality of life.

Sleeve gastrectomy on a patient with situs Inversus: A case report

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Bariatric surgery is one of the methods used to treat obesity. Performing Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) on patients with Situs Inversus Totals (SIT) could be very challenging and has no standard protocol yet. The aim of this case report is to describe our experience in performing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in situs inversus patients. The article has been reported in line with the SCARE criteria.

CASE PRESENTATION

Our patient is a 33-year-old woman with a body mass index (BMI) of 45 kg/m2, known case of polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) and secondary infertility. She was admitted to the hospital for LSG for weight reduction surgery. Preoperative investigations showed that the patient had SIT. Subsequently, we successfully performed LSG on this patient without intraoperative or postoperative complications. The patient was discharged home two days post-operation and given a follow-up appointment after two weeks.

CASE DISCUSSION

Literature review states that SIT occurs once in 10,000 to 50,000 births. Therefore, it can serve as a challenge when performing any operation such as LSG.

CONCLUSION

A good understanding and a well-planned approach prior to any surgery will ease the performance of the procedure and lead to better outcomes for the patient post-operation.

Very Low-Calorie Ketogenic Diet (VLCKD) as Pre-Operative First-Line Dietary Therapy in Patients with Obesity Who Are Candidates for Bariatric Surgery

Bariatric surgery is currently the most effective method for achieving long-term weight loss and reducing the risk of comorbidities and mortality in individuals with severe obesity. The pre-operative diet is an important factor in determining patients' suitability for surgery, as well as their post-operative outcomes and success in achieving weight loss. Therefore, the nutritional management of bariatric patients requires specialized expertise. Very low-calorie diets and intragastric balloon placement have already been studied and shown to be effective in promoting pre-operative weight loss. In addition, the very low-calorie ketogenic diet has a well-established role in the treatment of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus, but its potential role as a pre-operative dietary treatment prior to bariatric surgery has received less attention. Thus, this article will provide a brief overview of the current evidence on the very low-calorie ketogenic diet as a pre-operative dietary treatment in patients with obesity who are candidates for bariatric surgery.

"Orphaned" Stomach-An Infrequent Complication of Gastric Bypass Revision

While generally safe, bariatric operations have a variety of possible complications. We present an uncommon complication after gastric bypass revision, namely the creation of an "orphaned" segment of remnant stomach that was left inadvertently in discontinuity, leading to recurrent intra-abdominal abscesses. Sinogram ultimately proved the diagnosis, and the issue was successfully treated using a combination of surgical and endoscopic methods to control the abscess and to allow internal drainage.

Bariatric surgery for metabolic unhealthy obesity (MUO) during the COVID era: short-term results of a high-volume center

PURPOSE

During the coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) outbreak, most public hospitals worldwide have been forced to postpone a major part of bariatric surgery (BS) operations with unfavorable consequences for weight and obesity complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic BS on subjects with metabolically unhealthy obesity (MUO) during COVID-19 pandemic in a high-volume Italian center.

METHODS

Between March 2020 and January 2021, all patients with MUO submitted to laparoscopic BS (sleeve gastrectomy [SG], one anastomosis gastric bypass [OAGB] and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass [RYGB]) were enrolled according to the ATP III Guidelines, with a minimum follow-up of 3 months.

RESULTS

In the study period, 210 patients with MUO underwent laparoscopic BS (77 RYGB, 85 SG and 48 OAGB) in our obesity referral center. Postoperative major complications occurred in 4 patients (1.9%) with zero mortality. At 9-month follow-up, a total weight loss (TWL) of 28.2 ± 18.4, 26.1 ± 23.1 and 24.5 ± 11.3% (p = 0.042) was observed in RYGB, OAGB and SG groups, respectively. The rate of comorbidity resolution was very similar for all type of surgeries (p = 0.871). Only two cases of postoperative SARS-CoV-2 infection were registered (0.9%) and both cases resolved with medical therapy and observation.

CONCLUSION

Among the patients studied, all surgical techniques were safe and effective for MUO during the COVID era. This group of patients is at high risk for general and SARS-CoV-2-related mortality and therefore should be prioritized for BS.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, single-center retrospective cohort study.

Patient-specific stomach biomechanics before and after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

Obesity has become a global epidemic. Bariatric surgery is considered the most effective therapeutic weapon in terms of weight loss and improvement of quality of life and comorbidities. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is one of the most performed procedures worldwide, although patients carry a nonnegligible risk of developing post-operative GERD and BE.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this work is the development of computational patient-specific models to analyze the changes induced by bariatric surgery, i.e., the volumetric gastric reduction, the mechanical response of the stomach during an inflation process, and the related elongation strain (ES) distribution at different intragastric pressures.

METHODS

Patient-specific pre- and post-surgical models were extracted from Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans of patients with morbid obesity submitted to LSG. Twenty-three patients were analyzed, resulting in forty-six 3D-geometries and related computational analyses.

RESULTS

A significant difference between the mechanical behavior of pre- and post-surgical stomach subjected to the same internal gastric pressure was observed, that can be correlated to a change in the global stomach stiffness and a minor gastric wall tension, resulting in unusual activations of mechanoreceptors following food intake and satiety variation after LSG.

CONCLUSIONS

Computational patient-specific models may contribute to improve the current knowledge about anatomical and physiological changes induced by LSG, aiming at reducing post-operative complications and improving quality of life in the long run.

Ketogenic Diet for Preoperative Weight Reduction in Bariatric Surgery: A Narrative Review

Bariatric surgery (BS) is the most effective treatment in reducing weight and the burden of comorbidities in patients with severe obesity. Despite the overall low mortality rate, intra- and post-operative complications remains quite common. Weight loss before BS reduces surgical risk, but studies are inconclusive regarding which is the best approach to apply. In this review, we summarize the current evidence on the effect of a ketogenic diet (KD) before BS. All studies agree that KD leads to considerable weight loss and important improvements in terms of surgical risk, but populations, interventions and outcomes are very heterogeneous. KD appears to be a safe and effective approach to induce weight loss before BS. However, randomized controlled trials with better-defined dietary protocols and homogeneous outcomes are necessary in order to draw firm conclusions.

Impact of Weight Loss on the Severity of Albuminuria in Obese Diabetic Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass

Aim

To examine the effect of weight-loss induced bariatric procedures on albuminuria levels among diabetic patients suffering from obesity.

Methods

Adults patients who suffer from morbid obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) were included in a prospective cohort study. Subjects were scheduled to undergo laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) or one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB). The albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) was adopted to assess the degree of albuminuria. Microalbuminuria was determined as a ratio of >2.5-30 mg/mmol and >3.5-30 mg/mmol for males and females, respectively, while macroalbuminuria was diagnosed when the ACR exceeded >30 mg/mmol.

Results

The mean uACR decreased significantly from 20.95±16.89 to 9.92±12.69mg/mmol in LSG cohort (p <0.001), and from 19.52±16.65 to 9.34±11.77mg/mmol in the OAGB cohort, with no statistically considerable differences between both cohorts at the end of follow-up (p = 0.78). Twelve months after the procedures, the percentages of cases with microalbuminuria decreased significantly to 23.8% and 23.9%, respectively (p < 0.001); likewise, the percentages of cases with macroalbuminuria significantly decreased to 7.9% and 7.5% in the LSG and OAGB groups, respectively (p < 0.001). There were no statistically considerable differences between LSG and OAGB regarding the percentages of patients with micro or macroalbuminuria at the end of follow-up. Besides, there were no significant associations between the degree of weight loss and improvement (p = 0.959) or remission (p = 0.73) of microalbuminuria.

Conclusion

Bariatric surgery significantly reduced the severity of albuminuria 1-year after the procedure, with no preference for one procedure over the other.

Nutritional Status after Roux-En-Y (Rygb) and One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (Oagb) at 6-Month Follow-Up: A Comparative Study

Introduction: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) are two effective bariatric surgical procedures with positive outcomes in terms of weight loss, comorbidities remission, and adverse events profiles. OAGB seems to carry a higher risk of malnutrition, but existing data are controversial. The aim of this study is to objectively evaluate and compare malnutrition in patients undergoing RYGB and OAGB. Methods: Retrospective monocentric study of obese patients undergoing RYGB or OAGB between the 15 September 2020 and the 31 May 2021. Nutritional status was assessed using the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score and compared between groups. The primary outcome was the mean CONUT score at 6 months. The secondary outcomes included the incidence of malnutrition, comorbidities, including hypertension, insulin resistance and type II diabetes mellitus, and weight loss. Results: 78 patients were included: 30 underwent RYGB and 48 underwent OAGB. At 6-Month Follow-Up there was no difference between groups in the mean CONUT score nor in incidence of malnutrition. In both groups, the nutritional status significantly worsened 6 months after surgery (preoperative and postoperative score of 0.48 ± 0.9 and 1.38 ± 1.5; p = 0.0066 for RYGB and of 0.86 ± 1.5 and 1.45 ± 1.3; p = 0.0422 for OAGB). Type II Diabetes mellitus (DMII) and hypertension remission were significant in the OAGB group with a 100% relative remission in the DMII-OAGB group (p = 0.0265), and a 67% relative remission in the hypertension-OAGB group (p = 0.0031). Conclusions: No difference in nutritional status has been detected between patients undergoing RYGB or OAGB at the 6-Month Follow-Up. Both procedures may have significant mal-absorptive effects leading to decline in nutritional status. OAGB may be more efficacious in inducing DMII and hypertension remission. Larger prospective studies dedicated specifically to nutritional status after gastric bypass are needed to confirm the impact of different bypass procedures on nutritional status.

Impact of 30° Reserve Trendelenburg Position on Lung Function in Morbidly Obese Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

Background

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of patients' positioning before and after intubation with mechanical ventilation, and after extubation on the lung function and blood oxygenation of patients with morbid obesity, who had a laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

Methods

Patients with morbid obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m², ASA I – II grade) who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy at our hospital from June 2018 to January 2019 were enrolled in this prospective study. Before intubation, after intubation with mechanical ventilation, and after extubation, arterial blood was collected for blood oxygenation and gas analysis after posturing the patients at supine position or 30° reverse Trendelenburg position (30°-RTP).

Results

A total of 15 patients with morbid obesity were enrolled in this self-compared study. Pulmonary shunt (Qs/Qt) after extubation was significantly lower at 30°-RTP (18.82 ± 3.60%) compared to that at supine position (17.13 ± 3.10%, p < 0.01). Patients' static lung compliance (Cstat), during mechanical ventilation, was significantly improved at 30°-RTP (36.8 ± 6.7) compared to that of those in a supine position (33.8 ± 7.3, p < 0.05). The PaO₂ and oxygen index (OI) before and after intubation with mechanical ventilation were significantly higher at 30°-RTP compared to that at supine position, and in contrast, the P_A−aO₂ before and after intubation with mechanical ventilation was significantly reduced at 30°-RTP compared to that at supine position.

Conclusion

During and after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, patients with morbid obesity had improved lung function, reduced pulmonary shunt, reduced P_A−aO₂ difference, and increased PaO₂ and oxygen index at 30°-RTP compared to that supine position.

Clinical Impact of Mediterranean Diet Adherence before and after Bariatric Surgery: A Narrative Review

The population suffering from obesity is rapidly increasing all over the world. Bariatric surgery has shown to be the treatment of choice in patients with severe obesity. A Mediterranean diet has long been acknowledged to be one of the healthiest dietary patterns associated with a lower incidence of many chronic diseases. The aim of the present narrative review is to summarize the existing research on the clinical impact of a Mediterranean diet before and after bariatric surgery, focusing on its effects on weight loss and improvement in comorbidities. Although the current knowledge is limited, this information could add value and emphasize the importance of adopting a Mediterranean diet before and after bariatric surgery.

Fat-Free Mass and Skeletal Muscle Mass Gain Are Associated with Diabetes Remission after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in Males but Not in Females

Besides massive body weight loss, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) causes massive lean mass, including fat-free mass (FFM) and skeletal muscle mass (SM) that present higher metabolic rates in males. This study examines sex differences in FFM and SM changes of type 2 diabetes (T2D) remission at 12 months post-LSG. This cohort study recruited 119 patients (53.7% females) with T2D and obesity (body mass index 42.2 ± 7.0 kg/m²) who underwent LSG. Fat-mass (FM) loss was higher in males than in females (−12.8 ± 6.2% vs. −9.9 ± 5.0%, p = 0.02) after one-year post-operation. Regardless of the weight-loss difference, males had higher FFM and SM gain than did females (12.8 ± 8.0 vs. 9.9 ± 5.0% p = 0.02 and 6.5 ± 4.3% vs. 4.9 ± 6.2%, p = 0.03, respectively). Positive correlations of triglyceride reduction with FM loss (r = 0.47, p = 0.01) and SM gain (r = 0.44, p = 0.02) over 12 months post-operation were observed in males who achieved T2D remission. The T2D remission rate significantly increased 16% and 26% for each additional percentage of FFM and SM gain one year after LSG, which only happened in males. Increased FFM and SM were remarkably associated with T2D remission in males, but evidence lacks for females.

High-priority liver transplantation and simultaneous sleeve gastrectomy in MELD 32 end-stage liver disease: a case report with long-term follow-up

BACKGROUND

Morbid obesity is a worldwide epidemic closely linked to Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD), an ever more relevant indication for Liver Transplantation (LT). Obesity affects an increasing number of LT recipients, but the ideal management of these patients remain unclear. Bariatric surgery (BS) in LT setting is challenging but feasible, although the debate is still open about the best timing of bariatric surgery. Herein we report a case of high-priority LT and simultaneous sleeve gastrectomy (SG) in an obese young adult.

CASE REPORT

A 45 years old man with morbid obesity (BMI 46 kg/m²) and severe NAFLD-related end-stage liver disease (ESLD) underwent simultaneous LT and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) in an emergency setting, due to a MELD score of 32. He had substantial weight loss during long-term follow-up and enjoyed resolution of diabetes and hypertension. At 4 years follow-up, he has normal allograft function with appropriate immunosuppressant blood levels and no ultrasound evidence of steatosis.

CONCLUSION

In selected patients, combined LT and SG present several advantages in terms of transplant outcomes, weight loss and resolution of obesity-related comorbidities. In addition, it can be performed in the high-priority setting in case of severe ESLD with good results in the short- and long-term.

Laparoscopic Banded One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: A Single-Center Series

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass (LOAGB) is a relatively new procedure for the treatment of morbid obesity and related comorbidities. On average, this procedure results in good postoperative weight loss with a low complication rate. Recent publications suggest that dumping syndrome and weight regain might be reduced by placing a silicone ring over the gastric pouch during the procedure, so called laparoscopic banded one anastomosis gastric bypass (LBOAGB).

METHODS

86 patients undergoing LBOAGB between 2018 and 2020 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Hospital records were used to assess weight loss, comorbidity resolution, and any complications either in the short or medium term.

RESULTS

54 Female and 32 male patients were included with a mean age of 43 years (25-64), preoperative body mass index of 42 kg/m² (35-49), and preoperative weight of 114 kg (86-162). Thirty-four patients presented with type 2 diabetes (39.5%), 42 patients (49%) diagnosed with hypertension, 24 presented with OSAS (28%), and 21 (24%) hypercholesterolaemia patients were included. In total, 36 patients were diagnosed with multiple comorbidities. The operative data showed an average operative time of 48 minutes with 3.4% of patients suffering from early (minor) complications and 2.3% with a late (minor) complication. One patient required reoperation due to intra-abdominal bleeding. The median length of hospital stay was 2.5 days. Median follow-up was 18 months (5-36). In that period, no patient required ring removal or conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. Food intolerance/vomiting was present in 1 patient (1.1%), bile reflux was present in 1 patient (1.1%), and no stomal ulcers were observed. Mean % excess weight loss at 12 and 24 months was 72% and 80%, respectively. Fifty-two out of 86 patients (60%) had a complete resolution of comorbidities. A CONUT score >2 (mild malnutrition) was found in 40% of patients, while a CONUT score 0-1 was found in 60% of patients.

CONCLUSION

LBOAGB shows promising results in terms of safety and efficacy in the short term. Further prospective studies will be required to evaluate the consistency of the results in the long term.

The Effects of Bariatric Surgery and Gastrectomy on the Absorption of Drugs, Vitamins, and Mineral Elements

Bariatric surgery, which is an effective treatment for obesity, and gastrectomy, which is the primary treatment method for gastric cancer, alter the anatomy and physiology of the digestive system. Weight loss and changes in the gastrointestinal tract may affect the pharmacokinetic parameters of oral medications. Both bariatric and cancer patients use drugs chronically or temporarily. It is important to know how surgery affects their pharmacokinetics to ensure an effective and safe therapy. The Cochrane, PubMed, and Scopus databases were searched independently by two authors. The search strategy included controlled vocabulary and keywords. Studies show that bariatric surgery and gastrectomy most often reduce the time to maximum plasma concentration (t_max) and decrease the maximum plasma concentration (C_max) in comparison with the values of these parameters measured in healthy volunteers. Vitamin and mineral deficiencies are also observed. The effect depends on the type of surgery and the properties of the drug. It is recommended to use the drugs that have been tested on these groups of patients as it is possible to monitor them.

The effect of sleeve ablation of gastric mucosa on body weight and glucose homeostasis in Sprague-Dawley rat model

BACKGROUND

The gastric mucosa is an important endocrine organ, most of which is resected in sleeve gastrectomy (SG). The effect of removing most of the gastric mucosa has not been studied.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of ablating the gastric mucosa (an area proportional to that in SG), on obesity and diabetes in a rat model.

SETTING

The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University in Xuzhou Jiangsu, P. R. China.

METHODS

Among 34 fatty Sprague-Dawley rats, 26 randomly received low-dose streptozotocin (STZ) to induce diabetes and then were randomly assigned to gastric mucosa ablation (GMA, n = 10), sleeve gastrectomy (SG, n = 8), and sham (n = 8) groups. The remaining normal fatty rats were assigned to the non-diabetic gastric mucosa ablation (nGMA, n = 8) group. In the GMA groups, the gastric mucosa was thermally ablated using electrocautery. Rats were followed for 8 weeks postoperatively. Preoperative oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), insulin tolerance test (ITT), and mixed meal tolerance test (MMTT) were repeated at designated time points postoperatively. Changes in body weight, food intake, and fasting blood glucose were also recorded.

RESULTS

Fasting ghrelin concentration and area under curve (AUC) decreased significantly (P < .05) in the GMA groups and the SG group after surgery. Gastrin concentration remained unchanged in SG but decreased significantly in the GMA groups after surgery. Significantly increased GLP-1 AUC was found in the GMA groups and the SG group postoperatively. The decrease in fasting blood glucose did not differ significantly between the diabetic GMA and SG groups after surgery. Glucose AUC during OGTT in both SG and diabetic GMA groups was decreased significantly from the preoperative level, but the decreased glucose AUC in the SG group was significantly greater (P < .05). The decrease in body weight and food intake in the SG group was significantly greater than in the GMA groups.

CONCLUSION

Ablation of most of the gastric mucosa along the greater curvature is effective in weight loss and glycemic control in a rodent model.

Metabolic surgery for type II diabetes: an update

Bariatric operations have been documented in clinical trials to promote remission or dramatic improvement of Type II Diabetes Mellitus and related comorbidities. Herein we review randomized trials and meta-analyses published during the last 20 years on the results of bariatric/metabolic surgery in obese patients with type 2 diabetes with the aim of highlighting the scientific evidence available. Several studies and RCTs in the last 20 years have showed outstanding results of bariatric/metabolic surgery on Type II diabetes and comorbidities in patients with either BMI > 35 kg/m² or BMI < 35 kg/m². They have established that bariatric procedures are superior to non-surgical interventions for inducing weight loss and amelioration of type 2 diabetes, even in patients with a BMI between 30 and 35 kg/m². The physiopatologic changes that improve glucose homeostasis after bariatric surgery remain unclear but glycemic control is improved after sleeve gastrectomy, duodenal-jejunal bypass, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, gastric banding, One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass, and biliopancreatic diversion. Nevertheless, it is suggested that the various gastrointestinal procedures may have different effects and mechanisms of action. Metabolic surgery will help integrate knowledge and multidisciplinary expertise to provide a combination of conservative and surgical treatments for Type II diabetes. These treatments must be considered as complementary options and not alternative strategies, with the same goal of controlling diabetes and achieving cure.

Measuring Knowledge, Attitudes, and Barriers to Medication Adherence in Potential Bariatric Surgery Patients

BACKGROUND

Bariatric surgery is an effective treatment for the obesity epidemic, but the poor attendance and adherence rates of post-surgery recommendations threaten treatment effectiveness and health outcomes. Preoperatively, we investigated the unique contributions of clinical (e.g., medical and psychiatric comorbidities), sociodemographic (e.g., sex, age, and educational level), and psychopathological variables (e.g., binge eating severity, the general level of psychopathological distress, and alexithymia traits) on differing dimensions of adherence in a group of patients seeking bariatric surgery.

METHODS

The final sample consisted of 501 patients (346 women). All participants underwent a full psychiatric interview. Self-report questionnaires were used to assess psychopathology, binge eating severity, alexithymia, and three aspects of adherence: knowledge, attitude, and barriers to medical recommendations.

RESULTS

Attitude to adherence was associated with alexithymia (β = -2.228; p < 0.001) and binge eating disorder (β = 0.103; p = 0.047). The knowledge subscale was related to medical comorbidity (β = 0.113; p = 0.012) and alexithymia (β = -2.256; p < 0.001); with age (β = 0.161; p = 0.002) and psychiatric comorbidity (β =0.107; p = 0.021) manifesting in the barrier subscale.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated that alexithymia and psychiatric and eating disorders impaired adherence reducing attitude and knowledge of treatment and increasing the barriers. Both patient and doctor can benefit from measuring adherence prior to surgery, with a qualitative approach shedding light on the status of adherence prior to the postsurgical phase when the damage regarding adherence is, already, done. Graphical Abstract.

Safety and Outcomes of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in a General Surgery Residency Program

Background:

With the escalation of surgical treatment of morbid obesity, there is a growing interest in the training of bariatric surgeons. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) gained popularity both as a first-stage approach and as a stand-alone procedure.

Objectives:

The aim of this study was to assess detectable differences in LSG with intra-operative resident involvement.

Methods:

We reviewed obese patients, who had undergone LSG between January 1, 2017 and January 31, 2020. Collected data reported demographic factors, operative time, postoperative complications, and outcomes.

Results:

Among 313 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 94 were men and 219 were women. The procedures were performed either by an expert bariatric surgeon (group 1), or a general surgery resident (group 2), respectively in 228 and 85 cases. Mean operative time of the first group was 65.3 ± 18.8 minutes, while it was 74.3 ± 17.2 among trainees (p < 0.001). Perioperative complications were diagnosed in 13 patients (10 in group 1 and 3 in group 2). Mean excess body weight loss after 12 months was 87.7 ± 28.2% in the first group and 81.1 ± 31.6% in the residents group. Between the two groups, we found no differences in the incidence of perioperative complications and in surgical outcomes. Trainee involvement was associated with increased operative time, with no correlation with a worse postoperative course.

Conclusions:

Residents can safely perform LSG in referral centers under the supervision of an expert bariatric surgeon. Trainee involvement is not related to increased leak rate, nor to suboptimal short-term outcome.

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity and Klinefelter syndrome: clinical report on two patients, with long-term follow-up

INTRODUCTION

Klinefelter syndrome (KS) can appear as a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations, with no guidelines for appropriate treatment. We present the first study of bariatric surgery (BS) with a 48-month follow-up, for the management of two patients affected by obesity and KS.

CASES PRESENTATION

The first patient was a 32-year-old man with diagnosis of Klinefelter mosaicism (46 XY/47, XXY), Body Mass Index (BMI) of 50 kg/m², metabolic syndrome and Binge Eating Disorder (BED). He underwent a Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) with weight loss (BMI = 38 kg/m²) and improvements to his metabolic profile at 48 months. The second patient was a 44-year-old man with KS (47, XXY), BMI of 49 kg/m², Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome and BED. He underwent a banded LSG. After 48 months, he showed a satisfactory weight loss (BMI = 32 kg/m²) and amelioration of comorbidities.

CONCLUSION

In patients with KS, LSG demonstrated long-term beneficial effects for weight loss and amelioration of comorbidities. An interdisciplinary approach is mandatory, since it leads to adherence to follow-up programs and mental health well-being.

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Nonseverely Obese Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Recently, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have indicated that bariatric surgery in nonseverely obese patients with a body mass index (BMI) less than 35 kg/m² might be even superior to medical therapy with regard to type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remission, but the efficacy of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) compared with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in nonseverely obese patients has not been conclusively determined. The objective of this study is to compare LRYGB versus LSG for T2DM in nonseverely obese patients.

METHODS

A meta-analysis identifying RCTs evaluating LRYGB versus LSG for T2DM in nonseverely obese patients was conducted. The primary outcome was T2DM remission. Additional analyses comprised percent excess weight loss (%EWL), BMI, waist circumference, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), serum lipid level, medication use, quality of life, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Four RCTs concerning total 296 patients were included. T2DM remission rate and %EWL were of no difference between the two bariatric procedures. LRYGB was associated with lower BMI, waist circumference, low-density lipoprotein, and higher high-density lipoprotein than LSG. However, HbA1c, FPG, total cholesterol, and triglyceride were not significantly different between the two surgical groups. The medication use and quality of life were improved in both two groups. The gastroesophageal reflux diseases of LRYGB group were less than that of LSG group. Dumping syndromes were noted more frequently in the LRYGB group.

CONCLUSIONS

Both LRYGB and LSG have comparative effect on resolving T2DM in nonseverely obese patients at midterm follow-up. Further RCTs should address the potential risks and long-term effects of LRYGB and LSG in nonseverely obese patients.

Transhiatal Migration After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Myth or Reality? A Multicenter, Retrospective Study on the Incidence and Clinical Impact

PURPOSE

Only anecdotally reported, intrathoracic migration (ITM) represents an unacknowledged complication after sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) contributing to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) development, both recurrent and de novo. The primary endpoint of this study was to evaluate the incidence of postoperative ITM ≥ 2 cm; the secondary endpoint was to determine the relationships between ITM, GERD, endoscopic findings, and percentage of patients requiring surgical revision.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective, multicenter study on prospective databases was conducted, analyzing LSGs performed between 2013 and 2018. Inclusion criteria consisted of primary operation; BMI ranging 35-60 kg/m²; age 18-65 years; minimum follow-up 24 months; and postoperative UGIE, excluding concomitant hiatal hernia repair. Esophageal manometry and 24-h pH-metry were indicated, based on postoperative questionnaires and UGIE; patients with GERD due to ITM, and non-responders to medical therapy, were converted to R-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB).

RESULTS

An ITM ≥ 2cm was postoperatively diagnosed in 94 patients (7% of 1337 LSGs), after mean 24.16 ± 13.6 months. Postoperative esophagitis was found in 29 patients vs. 15 initially (p=0.001), while GERD was demonstrated in 75 (vs. 20 preoperatively, p< 0.001). Fifteen patients (16%) underwent revision to RYGB with posterior cruroplasty. Seventeen patients with severe GERD presented improvement of endoscopic findings and clinical symptoms as a result of conservative therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

ITM after LSG is not a negligible complication and represents an important pathogenic factor in the development or worsening of GERD. Postoperative UGIE plays a fundamental role in the diagnosis of esophageal mucosal lesions.

A Comprehensive Comparison of LRYGB and LSG in Obese Patients Including the Effects on QoL, Comorbidities, Weight Loss, and Complications: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose

To systematically and comprehensively evaluate the differences between laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) versus sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in obese patients.

Methods

A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from inception to December 2018. The meta-analysis was performed by the RevMan 5.3 software.

Results

Twenty-three articles with 7443 patients were included. In short term (< 3 years), LRYGB was superior to LSG in terms of improving comorbidities (T2D, odds ratio (OR) 1.93, 1.06–3.52, P < 0.05, hypertension, OR 1.59, 1.08–2.34, P < 0.05, dyslipidemia, OR 1.61, 1.05–2.46, P < 0.05), but there were no differences in the midterm and long term. Quality of life (QoL) after bariatric surgery was included, but no differences were observed in the QoL after LRYGB or LSG (gastrointestinal quality of life index (GIQLI) and Moorehead–Ardelt quality of life questionnaire (M-A-Q), P > 0.05). LRYGB achieved a higher EWL% than LSG (after 3 years, WMD 5.48, 0.13–10.84. P < 0.05; after 5 years, WMD 4.55, 1.04–8.05, P < 0.05) in long term, but no significant differences were found during 0.25- to 2.0-year follow-up. The rate of early and late complications was much higher in LRYGB than in LSG (early complications, OR = 2.11, 95% CI = 1.53–2.91, P < 0.001; late complications, OR = 2.60, 95% CI = 1.93–3.49, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

This meta-analysis showed that LRYGB was more effective than LSG in comorbidities’ resolution or improvement in short term. For weight loss, LRYGB had better long-term effects than LSG. In addition, no differences were observed in the quality of life after LRYGB or LSG. LRYGB was associated with more complications than LSG.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s11695-019-04306-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials Comparing Long-Term Outcomes of Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy

INTRODUCTION

Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has overtaken Roux-En-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) as the most common bariatric procedure worldwide. However, there is little long-term data comparing the two procedures.

OBJECTIVES

We perform a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing 5-year outcomes of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing RYGB and SG.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and NHS Evidence were searched for English language RCTs comparing RYGB with SG and assessed weight loss and/or comorbidity resolution at 5 years.

RESULTS

Five studies were included in the final analysis. Meta-analysis demonstrates a significantly greater percentage excess weight loss in patients undergoing RYGB compared with SG (65.7% vs 57.3%, p < 0.0001). Resolution of diabetes was seen in 37.4% and 27.5% after RYGB and SG respectively. There was no significant difference between RYGB and SG in rates of resolution or improvement of diabetes. Similarly, HbA1C levels were not significantly different between the two procedures. Resolution of dyslipidaemia was more common after RYGB (68.6% vs 55.2%, p = 0.0443). Remission of gastro-oesophageal reflux occurred in 60.4% in the RYGB group in contrast to 25.0% in the SG group (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Both RYGB and SG result in sustained weight loss and comorbidity control at 5 years. RYGB resulted in greater %EWL, improved dyslipidaemia outcomes and a lower incidence of postoperative gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD).

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in Terms of Efficacy and Safety: a Comparative Study During 11-Year Experience

PURPOSE

This cohort study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) for the management of morbid obesity during the 11-year experience.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was conducted between July 2006 and August 2019. Annually we recorded data about the weight, body mass index (BMI), percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL), percentage of weight loss (%WL), weight regain, and postoperative complications into a prospectively collected database.

RESULTS

A total of 1146 patients (LRYGB=396 and LSG=750) aged >18 years old were included in the study. Over the first 7 years after surgery, the weight loss rate was significantly higher in the LRYGB-treated group than the LSG-treated group, and weight regain was significantly lower in the LRYGB-treated group in comparison with the LSG-treated group. Our results revealed that statistically, but not clinically, the efficacy of LRYGB and LSG is equivalent in terms of %WL, %EWL, and weight regain within 8 years and more. Besides, there were no significant differences in surgery-related mortality and severe complications between the two procedures.

CONCLUSION

Our study's results indicated that the clinical efficacy of LRYGB in the management of obesity is better than LSG during the 11-year experience. But the differences in weight loss and weight regain were not statistically relevant at 8 years and more after the surgery. Also, a comparison of severe complications did not indicate significant differences between the two groups.

Neurocognitive and Psychopathological Predictors of Weight Loss After Bariatric Surgery: A 4-Year Follow-Up Study

Twenty to thirty percent of patients experience weight regain at mid and long-term follow-up. Impaired cognitive functions are prevalent in people suffering from obesity and in those with binge eating disorder, thereby, affecting the weight-loss outcomes. The aim of our study was to investigate neurocognitive and psychopathological predictors of surgical efficacy in terms of percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) at follow-up intervals of one year and 4-year. Psychosocial evaluation was completed in a sample of 78 bariatric surgery candidates and included psychometric instruments and a cognitive battery of neuropsychological tests. A schedule of 1-year and 4-year follow-ups was implemented. Wisconsin Sorting Card Test total correct responses, scores on the Raven's Progressive Matrices Test, and age predicted %EWL at, both, early and long-term periods after surgery while the severity of pre-operative binge eating (BED) symptoms were associated with lower %EWL only four years after the operation. Due to the role of pre-operative BED in weight loss maintenance, the affected patients are at risk of suboptimal response requiring ongoing clinical monitoring, and psychological and pharmacological interventions when needed. As a result of our findings and in keeping with the latest guidelines we encourage neuropsychological assessment of bariatric surgery candidates. This data substantiated the rationale of providing rehabilitative interventions tailored to cognitive domains and time specific to the goal of supporting patients in their post-surgical course.

Ten-year outcomes after primary vertical sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity: a monocentric cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the 10-year outcomes after sleeve gastrectomy (SG). Primary end-points were the long-term weight loss and the need for conversion and one of the secondary end-points was the incidence of gastroesophageal reflux (GERD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2006 and 2008, 40 consecutive patients had a primary SG. A retrospective analysis of our database and telephone interview of patients who defaulted clinic follow-up was conducted. Success of surgery was defined as percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) > 50% and no need for conversion.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients (85%) achieved a 10-year follow-up. There were 11 men and 23 women with a mean preoperative body mass index (BMI) of 44 ± 4 kg/m² and a mean age of 42 ± 8 years. Optimal weight loss was reached after a follow-up of 12 months: the mean BMI was 31 ± 5 kg/m² and %EWL 70 ± 21%. A progressive weight regain was observed over time. With a median follow-up of 11 years (range 7-12), the mean BMI and %EWL were respectively 36 ± 8 kg/m² (p < 0.005) and 42 ± 37% (p < 0.001). With a median delay of 9 years (range 7-9), 6 patients (18%) were converted to gastric bypass because of weight regain. On total, SG was successful only in 14 patients (41%). Success rate was particularly high in patients who had a 1-year %EWL > 75%: 10/12 (83%) vs. 4/22 (17%) (p < 0.001). Those 12 patients were only characterized by a lower preoperative BMI: 41 ± 2 vs. 45 ± 4 (p < 0.002). Besides, 22 patients (65%) had long-term GERD requiring medical treatment: the incidence of de novo GERD was 41% (6/14) and of persisting GERD 80% (16/20).

CONCLUSIONS

Our 10-year success rate after SG was 41% and the incidence of GERD 65%. SG should preferably be proposed to selected patients. Patients with low preoperative BMI and without preoperative symptoms of GERD appeared as the best candidates for SG.

Distal gastric mucosa ablation induces significant weight loss and improved glycemic control in type 2 diabetes Sprague-Dawley rat model

BACKGROUND

Excluding the foregut (distal stomach and duodenum) from food transit in RYGB normalizes glucose tolerance. Excluding/removing the duodenal mucosa partly improves glycemic control. So far, the effect of excluding/removing the gastric mucosa remains unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To observe the effect of removing the distal gastric mucosa on glucose tolerance.

METHOD

Thirty fatty Sprague-Dawley rats received low-dose streptozotocin (STZ) to induce type 2 diabetes (T2D), then randomly assigned to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB, n = 8), distal gastric mucosa removal (DGMR, n = 8), duodenal-jejunal bypass (DJB, n = 8), and Sham (n = 6) groups. In the DGMR group, the distal third of the gastric mucosa was removed by thermal ablation using an electrocautery. Rats were followed for 8 weeks postoperatively. Preoperative oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), insulin tolerance test (ITT), and mixed-meal tolerance test (MMTT) were repeated 3 and 6 weeks postoperatively. Changes in body weight, food intake, and fasting blood glucose were also recorded.

RESULTS

Gastrin AUC decreased significantly (p < 0.05) in the DGMR group after surgery. A significantly increased GLP-1 AUC was found in the RYGB, DGMR, and DJB groups at week 3 and only the RYGB group at week 6 postoperatively. The improved glucose tolerance in the RYGB group was significantly greater than the improved glucose tolerance in the DGMR and DJB groups. The improved glucose tolerance 3 and 6 weeks after surgery in the DGMR group was significantly greater than the improved glucose tolerance in the DJB group. Body weight decreased significantly in the RYGB, DGMR, and DJB groups postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Removing the distal gastric mucosa induced significant weight loss and improved glycemic control in T2D SD rat model. Therefore, the gastric mucosa exclusion in RYGB may be key to the weight loss and diabetes remission, which perhaps warrants a new theory.

Surgical outcome of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for resolution of type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Bariatric procedures are considered superior to medical therapies in managing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) are the most commonly used procedures for weight loss and comorbidity resolution worldwide. However, it is not yet known whether the degree of T2DM is influenced by the choice of bariatric procedure.

AIM

To quantitatively compare T2DM resolution over 1-5 years follow-up by LRYGB and LSG in morbidly obese patients.

METHODS

We searched the selected databases for full-text English language clinical studies that compared the effectiveness of LRYGB and LSG for T2DM resolution. Review manager 5.3 was used for data analysis, and the overall effect summary was represented in a forest plot.

RESULTS

From 1,650 titles retrieved by an initial search, we selected nine studies for this research. We found insignificant differences for T2DM resolution by LRYGB and LSG, with an odds ratio of 0.93 (95%CI: 0.64-1.35, Z statistics = 0.38, P = 0.71). Additionally, subset analyses for T2DM resolution showed insignificant differences after 24 mo (χ 2 = 1.24, df = 4, P = 0.87, overall Z effect = 0.23), 36 mo (χ 2 = 0.41, df = 2, P = 0.81, overall Z effect = 0.51), and 60 mo (χ 2 = 4.75, df = 3, P = 0.19, overall Z effect = 1.20) by LRYGB and LSG. This study reports a T2DM remission rate of 82.3% by LRYGB and 80.7% by LSG.

CONCLUSION

This study reports similar T2DM resolution rates by both LRYGB and LSG during 1-5 years of follow-up. However, long-term follow-up of 10 years is needed to further substantiate these findings.

A meta-analysis of the medium- and long-term effects of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

Background

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) are two representative bariatric surgeries. This study aimed to compare the effects of the LSG and LRYGB based on high-quality analysis and massive amount of data.

Methods

For this study databases of PubMed, Web of Science, EBSCO, Medline, and Cochrane Library were searched for articles published until January 2019 comparing the outcomes of LSG and LRYGB.

Results

This study included 28 articles. Overall, 9038 patients (4597, LSG group; 4441, LRYGB group) were included. The remission rate of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in the LRYGB group was superior to that in the LSG group at the 3-years follow-up. Five-year follow-up results showed that LRYGB had an advantage over LSG for the percentage of excess weight loss and remission of T2DM, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and abnormally low-density lipoprotein.

Conclusions

In terms of the long-term effects of bariatric surgery, the effect of LRYGB was better than of LSG.

Altered immune system in offspring of rat maternal vertical sleeve gastrectomy

Obesity in women results in reduced fertility and increased complications during pregnancy. Vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG) effectively reduces weight, type 2 diabetes, and dyslipidemia, but is also associated with preterm and small-for-gestational age births. The mechanism by which VSG influences fetal development remains unknown. Here we hypothesize that previously reported immune changes during rat VSG pregnancy are reflected long term in the immune system of the offspring. Offspring of VSG and sham dams were evaluated at postnatal day (PND) 21 and PND60. At PND21, VSG pups have lower numbers of circulating B lymphocytes compared with sham pups (P < 0.05) and have lower transcription of lymphocyte marker Ptprc (P < 0.01) in the spleen, while other lymphocyte populations measured are not different. Total plasma IgG is higher (P < 0.01) and C-reactive protein is lower (P < 0.05) in VSG offspring compared with sham offspring at PND21. The central nervous system of VSG pups is also affected at PND21, having higher expression of Il1b mRNA (P < 0.05) and higher immunoreactivity of microglia marker, IBA1, in the hypothalamus. At PND60, the immune-hematological differences are not present; however, mRNA expression of Il1b is elevated (P < 0.001) in the spleen of VSG offspring along with markers of T cells. These data suggest that the immune system of VSG offspring is compromised early in life, but rebounds after weaning and may even become hyperactive. Future work is needed to determine whether the immune system of VSG offspring is capable of mounting a proper defense and whether other aspects of development are affected.

A Randomized Trial of a Novel Chewable Multivitamin and Mineral Supplement Following Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

BACKGROUND

Vitamin and mineral deficiencies are common following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and can lead to significant morbidity, but little research on the efficacy of vitamin supplementation regimens exists. We compared the efficacy and tolerability of an investigational versus a standard multivitamin regimen in patients undergoing RYGB.

METHODS

Fifty-six patients, aged 18 to 65, were randomized to an investigational versus a standard multivitamin. Plasma levels of vitamins A, B-12, D, E-α, E-β/γ, thiamine, folate, iron, iron-binding capacity, iron saturation, prealbumin, and parathyroid hormone (PTH) were measured at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Proteins induced by vitamin K absence (PIVKA), beta-carotene, coenzyme Q10, and mixed tocopherols were measured at 3 months postoperatively. Primary outcomes were differences in plasma levels at 3 and 6 months. Secondary outcomes were palatability, ease of use, and adherence.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients were randomized to the standard regimen and 26 to the investigational multivitamin. Nine were lost to follow-up. At 3 months, plasma levels of PTH were lower (p = 0.042), and levels of vitamin D (p = 0.033), thiamine (p = 0.009), and beta-carotene (p = 0.033) were higher in the investigational multivitamin arm compared to those in the standard regimen arm. Patients receiving the investigational multivitamin reported higher taste satisfaction than those receiving the standard regimen (p = 0.035).

CONCLUSION

The investigational multivitamin appears to be more effective than a standard multivitamin in maintaining therapeutic levels of clinically relevant vitamins and minerals, and was more palatable. Additional studies should be conducted to confirm these findings and refine the optimal dosing regimen.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

www.clinicaltrials.gov under identifier NCT01475617.

Effectiveness of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity in achieving weight loss outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) are commonly performed weight loss procedures worldwide. Unfortunately, few studies have compared percentage total weight loss (%TWL) following these procedures. This research compared short-term, mid-term and long-term %TWL by LRYGB and LSG.

METHODS

Selected databases were searched for original articles that compared %TWL by LSG and LRYGB. Review manager 5.3 was used for data analysis. Effect summary was presented by forest plot.

RESULTS

A significantly better %TWL in 5 years was shown by LRYGB than LSG; pooled mean difference (MD) 1.87 (95% CI 0.27-3.48, z statistics = 2.28, p < 0.05). Subgroup analysis showed better %TWL by LRYGB than LSG at 24 months pooled MD 6.47 (95% CI 1.22-11.72, z statistics = 2.42, p < 0.05), however, better %TWL by LSG was noted after 36 months (pooled MD -0.23; 95% CI -0.39-0.06, z statistics = 2.65, p < 0.05). Finally, significantly better %TWL was noted for LRYGB at 60 months.

CONCLUSION

This study shows %TWL of 70.4% by LRYGB and 59.8% following LSG in at least half of patients from selected cohort. A significantly greater %TWL by LRYGB in short and long term, while higher %TWL by LSG in mid-term is reported.

Laparoscopic metabolic surgery for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in Asia: a scoping review and evidence-based analysis

Background

Laparoscopic metabolic surgery has been previously shown to be an effective treatment for obese patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). The objective of this scoping review is to determine the impact of metabolic surgery for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in Asia and perform an evidence-based analysis.

Methods

We performed a literature search in PubMed for research on laparoscopic metabolic surgery for the treatment of T2DM in Asia region. We classified the included studies based on the Oxford Center for Evidence Based Medicine guidelines. And performed and evidence analysis.

Results

In total, 205 articles were identified. 62.9% of the studies were from East Asia. The evidence of 26 studies are level I, 59 are level II. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) was the most commonly reported surgical procedure (63.1%) in Asia. The number of laparoscopic metabolic surgery for T2DM in Asian countries has increased rapidly over the last 8 years. We identified 16 studies which showed that laparoscopic metabolic surgery is an effective and safe treatment for T2DM in patients with a BMI of > 25 kg/m² to < 35 kg/m² in Asia.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that laparoscopic metabolic surgery might be an effective and safe treatment for T2DM patients with BMI < 35 kg/m², and that LSG is the most commonly performed surgical procedure for this in Asia.

Nutritional and Micronutrient Care of Bariatric Surgery Patients: Current Evidence Update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The continued success of bariatric surgery to treat obesity and obesity-associated metabolic conditions creates a need for a strong understanding of clinical nutrition both before and after these procedures.

RECENT FINDINGS

Surgically induced alteration of gastrointestinal physiology can affect the nutrition of individuals, especially among those who have undergone malabsorptive procedures. While uncommon, a subset of patients may develop protein-calorie malnutrition. In these cases, nutrition support should be tailored to the severity of malnutrition. Among all patients who undergo bariatric surgery, high rates of micronutrient deficiencies have been observed. To mitigate these deficiencies, empiric supplementation with multivitamins, calcium citrate, and vitamin D is generally recommended. Periodic surveillance should be performed for commonly deficient micronutrients, including thiamin (B1), folate (B9), cobalamin (B12), iron, and vitamin D. Following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, serum levels of copper and zinc should also be monitored. In addition, lipid-soluble vitamins should be monitored following biliopancreatic diversion with/without duodenal switch.

[Efficacy of two bariatric surgeries in type 2 diabetic patients with a body mass index of 25-27.5]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the therapeutic effects of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and laparoscopic duodenal-jejunal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADJB-SG) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and a low body mass index (BMI) of 25-27.5.

METHODS

Thirty-one type 2 diabetic patients with a BMI of 25-27.5 underwent bariatric surgeries in the General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command between August, 2013 and August, 2015. The patients receiving LRYGB (17 cases) and SADJB-SG (14 cases) were compared for physical indexes, glucose metabolism and of pancreatic islet function at 1 year after the surgeries.

RESULTS

No mortality occurred in the patients after the operations. At 1 year after the operation, the patients in LRYGB group showed significant improvements in body weight, BMI, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), oral glucose tolerance test 2 h (OGTT2h), C-peptide, fasting insulin (FINS), and postprandial 2 hour insulin (2 hPINS) (P<0.05); in SADJB-SG group, significant improvements were observed in the body weigh, BMI, HbA1c, FPG, OGTT2h, and FINS after the operation (P<0.05). The postoperative improvements in body weigh, BMI, HbA1c, FPG, OGTT2h, C-peptide, and 2hPINS were comparable between SADJB-SG group and LRYGB group (P>0.05), but the incidence of postoperative anastomotic ulcer was lower in SADJB-SG group.

CONCLUSION

SADJB-SG and LRYGB produce similar therapeutic effects in type 2 diabetic patients with a low BMI, but SADJB-SG is associated with a low incidence of postoperative complications and is therefore more suitable in such patients.