Immunosuppressive and Immunomodulating Therapy for Atopic Dermatitis in Pregnancy: An Appraisal of the Literature

European Guideline (EuroGuiDerm) on atopic eczema: Living update

The evidence- and consensus-based living guideline on atopic eczema was developed in accordance with the EuroGuiDerm Guideline and Consensus Statement Development Manual. The original EuroGuiDerm Guideline on atopic eczema was published in June 2022. Since then, the part of the guideline dealing with systemic therapy has been updated twice. This paper summarizes the results of the second update. Twenty-eight experts (including clinicians and patient representatives) from 12 European countries participated. The updated guideline provides guidance on which patients should be treated with systemic therapies, as well as recommendations and detailed information on each systemic drug. The systemic treatment options discussed in the guideline comprise conventional immunosuppressive drugs (azathioprine, ciclosporin, glucocorticosteroids, methotrexate and mycophenolate mofetil), biologics (dupilumab, lebrikizumab, nemolizumab and tralokinumab) and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors (abrocitinib, baricitinib and upadacitinib). Additionally, the updated guidelines address considerations for paediatric, adolescent, pregnant and breastfeeding patients. For all other aspects, please refer to the 2022 version.

Topical treatments in special populations of atopic dermatitis - Chinese perspective

INTRODUCTION

Atopic Dermatitis (AD) is a common chronic, recurrent inflammatory skin disease, characterized mainly by polymorphic skin lesions and severe itching, significantly affecting patients' physical and mental health. The pathogenesis of AD is complex, involving multiple factors such as genetics, environment, immunity, and microbiota. In terms of treatment, traditional systemic therapies are gradually being replaced by more targeted molecular immunotherapies, and the range of topical medications has become more diverse. However, research on AD treatment in special populations, such as children, pregnant women, lactating women, and the elderly, remains relatively limited.

AREAS COVERED

This review aims to discuss the research progress on topical treatments for AD in special populations both domestically and internationally, with a focus on personalized treatment approaches. It covers many aspects such as hormones, antimicrobial drugs, small molecule drugs, nanotechnology and microecological therapies, and proposes personalized treatments for each group and problems that need to be solved by current research.

EXPERT OPINION

Special populations have unique physiological characteristics, which may lead to different responses to topical medications. Therefore, personalized treatment strategies are especially important in this context. As insights into pathogenesis evolves, the novel therapies are on the rise, holding promise for more targeted treatment approaches.

The management of atopic dermatitis in women of childbearing age: confused terminology, lack of evidence and resulting clinical inertia

Confusion in definitions, conflicting opinions and limited evidence leave women of childbearing age with eczema, and treating clinicians, vulnerable to restrictive therapeutic practices.

The management of severe eczema in pregnancy

Atopic eczema (eczema; also known as atopic dermatitis) is a chronic inflammatory skin condition. The burden of eczema can be very substantial with significant itch, skin pain, secondary infection, sleep disturbance and psychological distress. Eczema is common in pregnancy. It is therefore important to offer effective treatment to pregnant women, especially those with moderate to severe disease where the burden is greatest. When eczema cannot be adequately managed with skin-directed approaches such as topical preparations and/or phototherapy, systemic therapy may be required to achieve disease control and requires early input from dermatology specialists. The aim of this short review is to summarise this approach.

Cutaneous Changes During Pregnancy: A Comprehensive Review

Pregnancy induces various physiological changes in a woman's body that significantly impact the skin involving the face and trunk. This comprehensive review explores the cutaneous changes in these regions, driven by hormonal, mechanical, and immunological factors. Physiological changes such as hyperpigmentation, striae gravidarum, and vascular alterations are discussed in addition to pathological conditions like acrochordon (skin tags), pemphigoid gestationis, impetigo herpetiformis, and intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Understanding these changes is essential for healthcare providers to offer appropriate reassurance and management to expectant mothers. This review provides insights into dermatological changes on the face and trunk during pregnancy to contribute to better clinical care and support future research.

Atopic dermatitis in women: special considerations in the childbearing years

Background

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is one of the most common inflammatory dermatoses in adults. Women are disproportionately impacted by AD and report significant impacts on quality of life compared to men.

Objective

Given the absence of formal guidelines for the treatment of AD in women of childbearing age, we will review special considerations for treating women of childbearing age with AD to ensure consistent care and optimal outcomes for these patients.

Methods

PubMed and Google Scholar databases were searched for relevant articles from database inception through May of 2023.

Results

There are several treatments including topical therapies, systemic therapies, and phototherapy that are considered safe during preconception, pregnancy and breastfeeding. Given the negative consequences of uncontrolled AD for both the mother and the unborn baby, the risks and benefits of potential therapies should be reviewed with all women of childbearing age suffering from AD.

Limitations

The gold standard in recommending therapies is randomized controlled trials; however, pregnant and lactating women are often excluded from these trials.

Conclusion

Through shared decision-making between the dermatologist, obstetrician, and patient, the risks and benefits of any therapy should be thoroughly discussed and considered with all women of childbearing age, to optimize care and outcomes for this unique population.

Immunosuppressive and immunomodulating therapy for atopic dermatitis in pregnancy: an appraisal of the literature

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is the most common dermatological diagnosis during pregnancy. Treatment of AD during pregnancy can be challenging, due to the unpredictable course and the fact that the therapy needs to be safe for both the mother and the fetus. Here we present an up-to-date appraisal of the literature on the treatment options available for AD in patients planning pregnancy, during pregnancy, and during breastfeeding. All patients with AD are recommended to supplement any medical treatment with daily applications of emollients. The first step in the medical treatment for AD during pregnancy are topical corticosteroids, and/or topical tacrolimus. If required, UV-light therapy can also be considered. Treatment with systemic therapy during pregnancy should always rely on a careful risk-benefit assessment and be based on shared-decision making between the treating physician and patient. The first-line systemic treatment option is cyclosporine A, whereas azathioprine may be considered in patients already receiving this treatment prior to pregnancy. Systemic glucocorticoids may also be used. Treatment with systemic JAK inhibitors is not recommended, whereas treatment with mycophenolate mofetil and methotrexate is contraindicated. Targeted therapy with dupilumab is not generally recommended, due to lack of experience in human pregnancies, yet some case-reports on their use are emerging. These recommendations are based on the authors appraisal of existing literature and the current recommendation from the European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis. It is always the responsibility of the treating physician to stay updated on the newest guidelines and literature when treating patients with AD during pregnancy.

Systemic anti-inflammatory treatment of atopic dermatitis during conception, pregnancy and breastfeeding: Interdisciplinary expert consensus in Northern Europe

Treating atopic dermatitis (AD) in pregnant or breastfeeding women, and in women and men with AD aspiring to be parents is difficult and characterized by uncertainty, as evidence to inform decision-making on systemic anti-inflammatory treatment is limited. This project mapped consensus across dermatologists, obstetricians and patients in Northwestern Europe to build practical advice for managing AD with systemic anti-inflammatory treatment in men and women of reproductive age. Twenty-one individuals (sixteen dermatologists, two obstetricians and three patients) participated in a two-round Delphi process. Full consensus was reached on 32 statements, partial consensus on four statements and no consensus on four statements. Cyclosporine A was the first-choice long-term systemic AD treatment for women preconception, during pregnancy and when breastfeeding, with short-course prednisolone for flare management. No consensus was reached on second-choice systemics preconception or during pregnancy, although during breastfeeding dupilumab and azathioprine were deemed suitable. It may be appropriate to discuss continuing an existing systemic AD medication with a woman if it provides good disease control and its benefits in pregnancy outweigh its risks. Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, methotrexate and mycophenolate mofetil should be avoided by women during preconception, pregnancy and breastfeeding, with medication-specific washout periods advised. For men preconception: cyclosporine A, azathioprine, dupilumab and corticosteroids are appropriate; a 3-month washout prior to conception is desirable for methotrexate and mycophenolate mofetil; there was no consensus on JAK inhibitors. Patient and clinician education on appropriate (and inappropriate) AD treatments for use in pregnancy is vital. A shared-care framework for interdisciplinary management of AD patients is advocated and outlined. This consensus provides interdisciplinary clinical guidance to clinicians who care for patients with AD before, during and after pregnancy. While systemic AD medications are used uncommonly in this patient group, considerations in this article may help patients with severe refractory AD.

Part 2: Understanding the role of Malassezia spp. in skin disorders: pathogenesis of Malassezia associated skin infections

INTRODUCTION

Malassezia is a major component of the skin microbiome, a lipophilic symbiotic organism of the mammalian skin, which can switch to opportunistic pathogens triggering multiple dermatological disorders in humans and animals. This phenomenon is favored by endogenous and exogenous host predisposing factors, which may switch Malassezia from a commensal to a pathogenic phenotype.

AREA COVERED

This review summarizes and discusses the most recent literature on the pathogenesis of Malassezia yeasts, which ultimately results in skin disorders with different clinical presentation. A literature search of Malassezia pathogenesis was performed via PubMed and Google scholar (up to May 2023), using the following keywords: Pathogenesis and Malassezia;host risk factors and Malassezia, Malassezia and skin disorders; Malassezia and virulence factors: Malassezia and metabolite production; Immunology and Malassezia.

EXPERT OPINION

Malassezia yeasts can maintain skin homeostasis being part of the cutaneous mycobiota; however, when the environmental or host conditions change, these yeasts are endowed with a remarkable plasticity and adaptation by modifying their metabolism and thus contributing to the appearance or aggravation of human and animal skin disorders.

The impact of the use of immunosuppressive treatment after an embryo transfer in increasing the rate of live birth

The tolerance of the immune system for the semi-allogeneic embryo is promoted by several factors and the cells involved in the immune system and factors in the mother during pregnancy. The dysregulation of the immune responses between the mother and fetus is a risk factor that raises the likelihood of rejection of the embryo and reproductive failure. To safeguard embryos and prevent immunological attacks, it is critical to suppress immunological rejection and encourage immunological tolerance. Based on current medical literature, it seems that immune cell management through immunosuppressive therapies can address reproductive failures. Immunosuppressive treatment has demonstrated encouraging results in terms of enhancing outcomes related to pregnancy and rates of live birth by regulating the immune responses of mothers and positively impacting the reproductive processes of humans. Currently, there is scarcity of high-quality data regarding the safety and efficacy of immunosuppressive therapies for children and mothers. Therefore, it is important to exercise caution while selecting use of any immunosuppressive therapy in pregnancy. This mini review provides a comprehensive overview of the existing literature regarding the impact of Calcineurin Inhibitors and anti-TNF treatment on improving the live birth rate following embryo transfer.

Safety of Biologics for Atopic Diseases During Pregnancy

The high prevalence of atopic diseases in women of childbearing age reveals the need to determine the safety of biologics during pregnancy. This review summarizes the effects of 7 Food and Drug Administration-approved biologics (omalizumab, mepolizumab, reslizumab, benralizumab, dupilumab, tezepelumab, and tralokinumab) on maternal and fetal outcomes. For this purpose, we reviewed English-language publications to investigate whether the use of biologics for atopic diseases during pregnancy increased the risk of preterm delivery, stillbirth, low birth weight, or congenital malformations. Most publications found were case reports, case series, or observational studies reporting outcomes in a total of 313 pregnancies. No randomized controlled studies were identified. We found that biologics do not seem to influence maternal or fetal outcomes. Indeed, worsening of the underlying atopic disease during pregnancy appears to be more detrimental to the viability of the pregnancy. Given the small sample size and scarcity of studies, future research should include prospective studies with comparable control groups without exposure to biologics and multicenter registries for long-term follow-up.

Validation of a Questionnaire to Assess the Perception of Women with Atopic Dermatitis in Family Planning

INTRODUCTION

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a highly frequent chronic inflammatory skin disease. It is important to know how women with AD approach family planning together with their disease. The aim of the present research is to develop and validate a questionnaire for women diagnosed with AD in order to measure their level of desire and gestational information.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted. Women between 18 and 45 years old with mild, moderate, and severe forms of the disease were included and disease-free controls. An exploratory factorial analysis of the primary components and varimax rotation was used to measure the validity of the construct. Cronbach's α was used to measure the reliability of the individual scales and the global questionnaire.

RESULTS

In total, 150 valid questionnaires were included. The final questionnaire consisted of 23 items that converged on six factors. The six scales had adequate reliability: "Pregnancy" (Cronbach's alpha = 0.95), "Conception" (Cronbach's alpha = 0.93), "Concern-information" (Cronbach's alpha = 0.82), "Breastfeeding" (Cronbach's alpha = 0.81), "Sexual life" (Cronbach's alpha = 0.79), and "Family planning" (Cronbach's alpha = 0.67). The total Cronbach's alpha of the questionnaire was 0.94.

DISCUSSION

This questionnaire is the first specific measurement instrument developed for women with AD of childbearing age that has demonstrated adequate levels of reliability and construct validity. We consider it useful and valuable to study aspects such as family planning in this patient profile, and that can influence their decision to have offspring.

The Use of Azathioprine in Atopic Dermatitis. A Review

Most patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) have a good response to topical treatment. However, some need systemic therapy in order to satisfactorily control the disease. Azathioprine is an accessible drug for patients in many countries, including underdeveloped countries, and therefore it's used by many dermatologists in moderate and severe AD. It is important to have a deep knowledge and understanding about this drug since it is an alternative therapy as a steroid-sparing agent and an affordable one. However, when it comes to systemic therapy for AD, it's not always clear its indications and it is necessary to have a closer follow-up of the patient. In this paper we describe thoroughly it's indications in AD, the mechanism of action of the drug, as well as the interactions, adverse effects, adequate monitoring, and precautions in special population that must be considered when prescribing azathioprine. This review will help dermatologists prescribe it safely to all patients who require it. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Lupus erythematosus: management of cutaneous manifestations during pregnancy

Lupus erythematosus is an autoimmune disease that often affects the skin. Cutaneous manifestations are generally subdivided into different subtypes, including acute, subacute and chronic courses. Management of lupus erythematosus cutaneous manifestations during pregnancy remains a clinical challenge until nowadays. To date, no recommendations have been published specifically for the treatment of this condition in pregnant women, so therapeutic strategies are mainly based on recommendations for general population and other rheumatologic and dermatologic diseases during pregnancy. This challenge is compounded by a lack of evidence-based studies, as clinical trials in pregnant women are considered unethical in many circumstances, so data are often extrapolated from low-evidence sources. The aim of this article consists in review currently evidence of treatment of lupus erythematosus cutaneous lesion in pregnant women. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Atopic dermatitis: molecular, cellular, and clinical aspects

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a complicated, inflammatory skin disease, which numerous genetic and environmental factors play roles in its development. AD is categorized into different phenotypes and stages, although they are mostly similar in their pathophysiological aspects. Immune response alterations and structural distortions of the skin-barrier layer are evident in AD patients. Genetic makeup, lifestyle, and environment are also significantly involved in contextual factors. Genes involved in AD-susceptibility, including filaggrin and natural moisturizing, cause considerable structural modifications in the skin's lipid bilayer and cornified envelope. Additionally, the skin's decreased integrity and altered structure are accompanied by biochemical changes in the normal skin microflora's dysbiosis. The dynamic immunological responses, genetic susceptibilities, and structural modifications associated with AD's pathophysiology will be extensively discussed in this review, each according to the latest achievements and findings.

Novel systemic treatments in atopic dermatitis: Are there sex differences?

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common inflammatory skin disease with a significant global disease burden. Several mechanisms underlie AD, such as epidermal barrier dysfunction and immune dysregulation, which have led to innovative systemic treatment options. Other inflammatory disorders, as well as innate and adaptive immune responses, have noted sex differences, but our article highlights a paucity of data on the impact of sex, gender, and gender identity on the pathophysiology and systemic treatments of AD.

Practical Management of Patients with Atopic Dermatitis on Dupilumab

INTRODUCTION

Dupilumab is approved to treat moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in several countries in patients as young as 6 years of age. Since its approval, practical issues related to the use of dupilumab for AD have arisen, with particular interest in transitioning from current therapies and managing medication overlap, considerations for special populations of patients with AD, and management of potential adverse events.

METHODS

This article aims to review the literature addressing several practical management issues related to dupilumab use for AD and to provide a framework for clinical decision-making in these circumstances and sub-populations. Each statement was reviewed, revised and voted on by authors to provide their level of agreement and degree of uncertainty for each statement.

RESULTS

An agreement level > 80% was achieved for all of the statements.

CONCLUSION

The expert panel provides statements considering the practical management of patients with AD taking dupilumab to inform clinical decision-making in specific but frequently encountered clinical situations.