Comparative Efficacy of Targeted Systemic Therapies for Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis without Topical Corticosteroids: An Updated Network Meta-analysis

Multidimensional Burden of Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis in Adolescent and Adult Patients from Portugal and Greece: Results from the Global Cross-Sectional Study MEASURE-AD

INTRODUCTION

Despite significant progress observed in the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD), a considerable number of patients with severe disease are undertreated and have inadequate symptom control. This may be due to several reasons, such as underestimation of the implications of the disease on patients, families, and society, as well as inconsistent access to effective treatment. The multidimensional disease burden of AD includes other atopic comorbidities, sleep disturbance, and functional impairment and secondary consequences, including neuropsychiatric issues (anxiety and depression) and reduced health-related quality of life.

METHODS

MEASURE-AD was a global, cross-sectional observational study in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe AD, conducted to describe disease burden, treatment patterns, and healthcare resource utilization.

RESULTS

The results concerning patients from Portugal and Greece indicate moderate-to-severe disease for most of the population with frequent disease flares. The quality of life of both adolescents and adults was greatly affected, mainly owing to itch. One out of five patients perceived that their treatment was not effectively controlling AD. Disease resulted in important out-of-pocket expenses and loss of productivity.

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding and recognizing the complex burden of moderate-to-severe AD is required to encourage and guide changes in public policy for the effective management of patients.

Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Upadacitinib and Abrocitinib in Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A 52-Week Retrospective Study

Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic pruritic inflammatory disease affecting children and adults. Upadacitinib and abrocitinib are selective Janus kinase 1 inhibitors approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe AD. Although their efficacy and safety are described in phase 3 clinical trials, real-world data are limited. Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of upadacitinib and abrocitinib treatment in a real-life adult population with moderate-to-severe AD throughout an extended observation period. Methods: This retrospective observational study was conducted by analyzing data from the electronic records of IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital from January 2023 to December 2024. Patients were administered either upadacitinib (15 or 30 mg) or abrocitinib (100 or 200 mg). Effectiveness was evaluated by using clinician-reported scores (Investigator Global Assessment [IGA] and Eczema Area and Severity Index [EASI]) and patient-reported outcomes (peak pruritus numerical rating scale [PP-NRS]) at weeks 8, 16, 32 and 52. Statistical significance was set at a probability value (p-value) < 0.05. Adverse events were also collected. Results: In total, 129 patients were included in the study, and 84 of them reached 52 weeks. At week 52, the EASI 75, 90, and 100 responses were 88.9%, 70.8%, and 54.2% for upadacitinib, and 100%, 91.7%, and 75% for abrocitinib. An IGA score equal to 0 or 1 at 52 weeks was achieved by 84.7% of patients treated with upadacitinib and 100% of those receiving abrocitinib. A four-point reduction from baseline PP-NRS was reported by 86.1% for upadacitinib and by 83.3% of patients for abrocitinib after one year of follow-up. Conclusions: Our study showed comparable or even higher effectiveness outcomes in terms of EASI 75, EASI 90, and EASI 100 at week 52 compared to phase-3 clinical trials, with no new safety concerns, supporting the real-world effectiveness of abrocitinib and upadacitinib in moderate-to-severe AD.

[Systemic therapy of atopic dermatitis and psoriasis in children and adolescents]

Psoriasis and atopic dermatitis are among the most frequent chronic, inflammatory skin diseases of childhood and adolescence. Regarding profound consequences for the physical and psychosocial development of affected patients, a timely and individually adapted therapy has to be initiated, in case of severe disease systemic treatment. Modern, targeted, highly efficient and well-tolerated agents are currently available. Overlapping psoriasis and atopic dermatitis have been appreciated recently, both idiopathic and therapeutically induced. Their prevention or early detection is mandatory for optimal management of patients.

Effectiveness of Switching From Upadacitinib to Tralokinumab in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Real-World Clinical Practice

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic eczematous disorder characterized by intense itchiness. Systemic therapies for AD include Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors and various biological agents. The effects of transitioning from the JAK1 inhibitor, upadacitinib, to the anti-interleukin 13 antibody, tralokinumab, remain unclear.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the transition from 15 mg of upadacitinib to tralokinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe AD.

METHODS

This analysis included 20 patients who switched from 15 mg of upadacitinib to tralokinumab due to an inadequate response or adverse events (AEs). We assessed the total and regional eczema area and severity index (EASI), which included assessments of the head and neck, trunk, and upper and lower limbs, along with erythema, edema/papulation, excoriation, lichenification, and the peak pruritus numerical-rating scale (PP-NRS), initially (start of 15 mg of upadacitinib), at the transition point (week 0), and during follow-up at weeks 4 and 12.

RESULTS

The EASI, EASI of the four anatomical regions, and EASI of the four clinical manifestations significantly declined from baseline at weeks 4 and 12, with no substantial reductions from week 0. The PP-NRS score notably decreased from baseline at week 4. Achieving EASI of 50 and 75 improved post-switching.

CONCLUSION

Transitioning to tralokinumab substantially alleviated rash in patients with AD who experienced suboptimal responses or AEs to 15 mg of upadacitinib.

Lebrikizumab vs Other Systemic Monotherapies for Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Network Meta-analysis of Efficacy

INTRODUCTION

A systematic literature review and network meta-analysis (NMA) were conducted to compare the short-term efficacy of lebrikizumab to other biologic and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor monotherapies approved for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in adults and adolescents.

METHODS

The NMA included randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled monotherapy phase 2 and 3 trials of biologics (lebrikizumab 250 mg every 2 weeks [Q2W], dupilumab 300 mg Q2W, and tralokinumab 300 mg Q2W) and JAK inhibitors (abrocitinib 100/200 mg daily, baricitinib 2/4 mg daily, and upadacitinib 15/30 mg daily) at approved doses. Efficacy outcomes included the proportions of patients achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) improvement, an Investigator Global Assessment of 0 or 1 (IGA 0/1), and a ≥ 4-point improvement in pruritus/itch numeric rating scale score at 12 weeks (abrocitinib) or 16 weeks (other treatments). Itch was also assessed at week 4. A Bayesian NMA employing baseline risk-adjusted random effects models was used to estimate treatment differences.

RESULTS

Twenty-two monotherapy studies involving 8531 patients were included in the NMA. By week 12/16, lebrikizumab had superior odds of achieving IGA 0/1 and itch improvement compared to baricitinib and tralokinumab; similar odds to dupilumab, abrocitinib, and upadacitinib 15 mg; and inferior odds to upadacitinib 30 mg. Additionally, lebrikizumab had a higher probability of improving EASI than baricitinib 2 mg; similar probability to baricitinib 4 mg, tralokinumab, dupilumab, abrocitinib, and upadacitinib 15 mg; and lower probability than upadacitinib 30 mg daily. At week 4, lebrikizumab had superior odds of improving itch compared to tralokinumab; similar odds to baricitinib, dupilumab, and abrocitinib 100 mg; and inferior odds to abrocitinib 200 mg and upadacitinib.

CONCLUSION

Among biologics, lebrikizumab was comparable to dupilumab and superior to tralokinumab in improving response rates at week 16. Upadacitinib 30 mg was the only JAK inhibitor with superior response rates compared to lebrikizumab.

Atopic dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis is the most common chronic inflammatory skin disease globally. Key features include an eczematous eruption accompanied by intense itch, which can have an enormous negative effect on patients' quality of life, especially in those with moderate-to-severe disease. Atopic dermatitis is part of a spectrum of atopic conditions that can also include several non-cutaneous organs such as respiratory (eg, allergic rhinitis and asthma) and gastrointestinal (eg, food allergy) systems. For decades, long-term disease control and maintenance were particularly challenging given that treatment options were limited to broad topical and systemic immunosuppressive agents. However, better insights into the pathophysiology of this condition over the past decade have led to the development and approval of safe and efficacious novel targeted treatment approaches. The updated pathophysiological understanding and the evolving therapeutic landscape of atopic dermatitis are discussed in this Seminar.

Comparative efficacy of biologics and small molecule drugs in treating pediatric atopic dermatitis in patients aged 2-18 years: A 12-16 week network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis (AD) predominantly manifests before age five, with significant phenotype variations across age groups. Despite increasing systemic treatments for pediatric AD, head-to-head comparisons in network meta-analyses focused on children are scarce.

METHODS

Through systematic searches of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library up to March 2024, we identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating systemic treatments for moderate-to-severe AD in children aged 2-18 years. From 900 screened articles, 8 RCTs (n = 2636) met inclusion criteria, comparing dupilumab, baricitinib, upadacitinib, and abrocitinib versus placebo with standard care. Primary outcome was Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) scores at 12-16 weeks.

RESULTS

Upadacitinib demonstrated highest efficacy at both 30 mg (risk difference [RD] 0.62 [0.53, 0.71]) and 15 mg (RD 0.52 [0.42, 0.62]). Dupilumab (weight-based dosing with corticosteroids; RD 0.43 [0.29, 0.57]), abrocitinib (200 mg; RD 0.40 [0.29, 0.50]; 100 mg; RD 0.30 [0.20, 0.41]), and baricitinib (4 mg; RD 0.21 [0.06, 0.35]) also showed significant efficacy over placebo.

CONCLUSION

This analysis establishes a hierarchy of effectiveness among systemic therapies for pediatric AD, with upadacitinib showing highest efficacy. However, the predominance of adolescent data emphasizes the need for age-stratified studies in younger children and long-term safety assessments.

Comparative efficacy of targeted systemic therapies for pruritus in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis without topical treatment: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Chronic pruritus is the most prevalent and severe symptom of atopic dermatitis (AD).

OBJECTIVE

This network meta-analysis aims to assess the comparative efficacy of systemic targeted monotherapies in alleviating pruritus among adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD.

METHODS

Data were collected from phase 3/4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published until 24 August 2024, focusing on targeted therapies for moderate-to-severe AD. The outcome measure was the proportion of patients achieving a ≥ 4-point improvement from baseline on the Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). This analysis included both primary endpoints (week 12 or week 16) and secondary endpoints (weeks 2, 4, and 8).

RESULTS

Eleven reports comprising 16 studies with 8,462 participants were included. At all time points examined, targeted therapies demonstrated statistically significant efficacy over placebo, with upadacitinib 30 mg showing the highest response rate. The next most effective treatments at the primary endpoint were abrocitinib 200 mg, upadacitinib 15 mg, dupilumab 300 mg, and lebrikizumab 250 mg. Cumulative ranking probabilities at secondary endpoints varied based on time points.

CONCLUSION

Targeted therapies, particularly upadacitinib 30 mg, showed significant advantages in managing moderate-to-severe AD pruritus. Further direct comparative trials are needed for conclusive evidence.

Patients' preferences for systemic treatment of atopic dermatitis: safety and efficacy count the most

BACKGROUND

The advent of biologics and janus kinase inhibitors has revolutionized treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD).

OBJECTIVE

To investigate preferences of patients with AD for attributes of currently approved systemic treatments and assess influencing factors.

METHODS

An online discrete choice experiment was conducted in patients with AD throughout Germany to analyze preferences for outcome (probability of (almost) clear skin at week 16, probability of significant itch improvement, time to onset of itch relief and type of side effects) and process attributes (application method and frequency of laboratory tests).

RESULTS

Participants (n = 182, 75.3% female) considered side effects (Relative Importance Score (RIS): 31.2), (almost) clear skin (RIS: 24.2) and probability of itch improvement (RIS: 16.0) most important. Application method (RIS: 14.4), time to onset of itch relief (RIS: 7.4) and frequency of laboratory tests (RIS: 6.8) were less relevant. Preferences were significantly influenced by sex, age, psychiatric comorbidity, current therapy and health-related quality of life according to multivariate regression analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants attached great importance to safety and symptom control. However, preferences were also dependent on individual characteristics, underscoring the importance of personal counseling. Conjoined with medical considerations, patients' preferences have fundamental impact on shared decisions for treatment of AD.

Systemic Immunomodulatory Treatments for Atopic Dermatitis: Living Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis Update

Importance

There are multiple approved systemic treatments for atopic dermatitis. Lebrikizumab is a newly licensed biologic medication that has been compared to placebo in clinical trials but not to other systemic treatments.

Objective

To compare reported measures of efficacy and safety of lebrikizumab to other systemic treatments for atopic dermatitis in a living systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Data Sources

The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, the Latin American and Caribbean Health Science Information database, the Global Resource of Eczema Trials database, and trial registries were searched from inception through November 3, 2023.

Study Selection

Randomized clinical trials evaluating 8 or more weeks of treatment with systemic immunomodulatory medications for moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. Titles, abstracts, and full texts were screened in duplicate.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Data were abstracted in duplicate and random-effects bayesian network meta-analyses were performed. Minimal important differences were used to define important differences between medications. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). The updated analysis was completed from December 13, 2023, to February 20, 2024.

Main Outcome Measures

Efficacy outcomes were the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), the Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scales (PP-NRS) and were compared using mean difference (MD) with 95% credible intervals (CrI). Safety outcomes were serious adverse events and withdrawal due to adverse events. Other outcomes included the proportion of participants with 50%, 75%, and 90% improvement in EASI (EASI-50, -75, -90) and the proportion with success on the Investigator Global Assessment compared using odds ratios with 95% CrI.

Results

The study sample included 97 eligible trials, with a total of 24 679 patients. Lebrikizumab was associated with no important difference in change in EASI (MD, -2.0; 95% CrI, -4.5 to 0.3; moderate certainty), POEM (MD, -1.1; 95% CrI -2.5 to 0.2; moderate certainty), DLQI (MD, -0.2; 95% CrI -2.1 to 1.6; moderate certainty), or PP-NRS (MD, 0.1; 95% CrI -0.4, 0.6; high certainty) compared to dupilumab among adults with atopic dermatitis who were treated for up to 16 weeks. Dupilumab was associated with higher odds of efficacy in binary outcomes compared with lebrikizumab. The relative efficacy of other approved systemic medications was similar to that found by previous updates of this living study, with high-dose upadacitinib and abrocitinib demonstrating numerically highest relative efficacy. For safety outcomes, low event rates limited useful comparisons.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this living systematic review and network meta-analysis, lebrikizumab was similarly effective to dupilumab for the short-term treatment of atopic dermatitis in adults. Clinicians and patients can use these comparative data to inform treatment decisions.

Efficacy of Upadacitinib and Dupilumab on Achieving Stringent and Composite Skin and Itch Outcomes: an Indirect Comparison of Adults with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis

INTRODUCTION

Efficacy of upadacitinib has been assessed in trials including Measure Up 1 (NCT03569293), Measure Up 2 (NCT03607422), and Heads Up (NCT03738397). Measure Up 1 and 2 assessed efficacy of upadacitinib 30 mg and upadacitinib 15 mg against placebo, while Heads Up assessed efficacy of upadacitinib 30 mg in a head-to-head trial against dupilumab 300 mg. A head-to-head trial of upadacitinib 15 mg against dupilumab 300 mg has not been conducted. Network meta-analysis has shown that upadacitinib 30 mg and upadacitinib 15 mg are among the most efficacious targeted systemic therapies, but prior indirect comparisons have not evaluated more stringent outcomes.

METHODS

A population-adjusted indirect comparison was conducted using post hoc individual patient data from Measure Up 1 and 2 and Heads Up to estimate how upadacitinib 15 mg would have performed if included in Heads Up by adjusting for patient-level covariates. Absolute response rates at weeks 4, 16, and 24 were estimated for the following outcomes: no/minimal itch [Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (WP-NRS) score of 0/1], Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score of ≤ 3 (EASI ≤ 3), 100% improvement in EASI (EASI 100), both ≥ 90% improvement in EASI (EASI 90) and WP-NRS 0/1, both EASI ≤ 3 and WP-NRS 0/1, and both EASI 100 and WP-NRS 0/1. The analysis was conducted on adult patients, aligned with the intention-to treat population for the clinical trials, and used non-responder imputation.

RESULTS

Across all outcomes assessed, the estimated absolute response rates were greatest for upadacitinib 30 mg, followed by upadacitinib 15 mg and then dupilumab. This pattern was observed at week 4, week 16, and week 24.

CONCLUSIONS

For adults with moderate-to-severe AD, upadacitinib 30 mg appears to be the most efficacious treatment in attaining more stringent and composite outcomes across multiple timepoints, followed by upadacitinib 15 mg and then dupilumab 300 mg.

Blocking the IL-4/IL-13 Axis versus the JAK/STAT Pathway in Atopic Dermatitis: How Can We Choose?

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is an immune-mediated skin disorder with a chronic-relapsing course and a multifactorial pathogenesis. In contrast to the traditional concept of AD as solely a type 2 immune-activated disease, new findings highlight the disease as highly heterogeneous, as it can be classified into variable phenotypes based on clinical/epidemiological or molecular parameters. For many years, the only therapeutic option for moderate-severe AD was traditional immunosuppressive drugs. Recently, the area of systemic therapy of AD has significantly flourished, and many new substances are now marketed, licensed, or in the last step of clinical development. Biological agents and small molecules have enriched the therapeutic armamentarium of moderate-to-severe AD, such as dupilumab, tralokinumab, lebrikizumab (monoclonal antibodies targeting the IL-4/13 pathway), abrocitinib, upadacitinib, and baricitinib (JAK inhibitors). Indeed, the AD treatment paradigm is now split into two main approaches: targeting the IL-4/13 axis or the JAK/STAT pathway. Both approaches are valid and have strong evidence of preclinical and clinical efficacy. Therefore, the choice between the two can often be difficult and represents a major challenge for dermatologists. Indeed, several important factors must be taken into account, such as the heterogeneity of AD and its classification in phenotypes, patients' comorbidities, age, and personal preferences. The aim of our review is to provide an overview of the clinical and molecular heterogeneities of AD and to explore the factors and parameters that, in clinical practice, may help inform clinical decision-making.

Emerging Systemic Treatment Options in Atopic Dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory condition that significantly affects the quality of life of both patients and their families or caregivers. Recently, treatment for moderate-to-severe AD were limited to conventional immunosuppressive therapies. However, currently, with the approval of biologic treatments and oral small molecules in the past decade, the effective and safe management of patients with AD is possible. Despite these advancements, challenges and unmet needs in clinical practice remain. This includes patients who do not respond well to or cannot tolerate existing treatment options and inadequate therapies that can modify the disease course. This review aimed to provide an overview of the current treatment approach for AD, highlight the current challenges in treatment, and discuss the rationale for novel treatment options and emerging evidence on systemic treatment options for AD.

An updated reappraisal of dupilumab in children and adolescents with moderate-severe atopic dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is still a demanding challenge in clinical practice. Type 2 inflammation is the most common inflammatory pathway in children and adolescents with AD. Anti-inflammatory drugs, mainly corticosteroids (CS) and immunomodulant agents are the primary therapeutic approach to dampening type 2 inflammation. However, AD patients may require long-term high CS doses or drug combinations with possibly significant adverse effects to achieve and maintain disease control. In this regard, the advent of biologics constituted a breakthrough in managing this condition. Dupilumab is a monoclonal antibody directed against the IL-4 receptor α-subunit (IL-4Rα), antagonizing both IL-4 and IL-13 and is approved for pediatric severe AD. This review presents and discusses the most recent published studies on dupilumab in children and adolescents with AD. There is convincing evidence that dupilumab is safe and effective in managing AD. It can reduce skin lesions and associated itching, reduce the need for additional medications, and improve disease control and quality of life. However, a thorough diagnostic pathway is mandatory, especially considering the different AD phenotypes. The ideal eligible candidate is a child or adolescent with AD requiring systemic treatment because of severe clinical manifestations and impaired quality of life.

Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison of the Efficacy at Week 32 of Tralokinumab and Dupilumab in the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis

INTRODUCTION

Tralokinumab and dupilumab are biological agents licensed for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in adult patients who are candidates for systemic treatment. However, no head-to-head studies of their efficacy have been conducted. This study indirectly compared the efficacy of tralokinumab and dupilumab, both in combination with topical corticosteroids (TCS), at week 32.

METHODS

An unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison was conducted using individual patient data (IPD) from the ECZTRA 3 tralokinumab trial and aggregate data from the LIBERTY AD CHRONOS dupilumab trial. IPD were selected by applying inclusion criteria from LIBERTY AD CHRONOS and weighting to match summary baseline characteristics-age, sex, race, body mass index, disease duration, Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and SCORing Atopic Dermatitis index-of patients treated with dupilumab. Week 32 outcomes of interest were 50%, 75% or 90% improvements in EASI (EASI-50, EASI-75 and EASI-90), IGA scores of 0 or 1 (IGA 0/1), ≥ 4-point improvement in worst daily pruritus numerical rating scale (NRS) score, and mean improvements in DLQI and the Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM).

RESULTS

After matching, tralokinumab and dupilumab, both in combination with TCS, showed similar efficacy across clinical response endpoints at week 32 (IGA 0/1, tralokinumab 49.9% vs dupilumab 39.3%; EASI-50, 78.9% vs 77.5%; EASI-75, 71.5% vs 71.9%; EASI-90, 53.3% vs 56.2%). The mean change from baseline in DLQI was statistically significantly larger in the matched tralokinumab plus TCS population than in the dupilumab plus TCS arm (- 12.1 vs - 10.4, p = 0.005). Changes in POEM and worst daily pruritus NRS were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The results of this analysis demonstrate that, in combination with TCS, tralokinumab and dupilumab have similar efficacy in the treatment of moderate-to-severe AD at 32 weeks of therapy.

Effectiveness of Dose Increase in Upadacitinib from 15 mg to 30 mg for Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Real-World Clinical Practice in Japan

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis is characterized by persistent eczema and pruritus. Janus kinase inhibitors, including upadacitinib, are effective treatments for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. If patients do not respond well to a certain dose of a Janus kinase inhibitor, increasing the dose may improve their treatment responsiveness.

OBJECTIVES

We assessed the outcomes of a dose increase in upadacitinib from 15 mg to 30 mg for Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.

METHODS

In 23 patients who showed insufficient responses to upadacitinib 15-mg treatment, the dose of upadacitinib was increased to 30 mg. We evaluated total Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), EASI on the head and neck, trunk, upper, or lower limbs, EASI of erythema, edema/papulation, excoriation, or lichenification, and Peak Pruritus Numerical-Rating Scale at baseline (onset of upadactinib 15 mg), week 0 (time of increase), and weeks 4 and 12 after the increase.

RESULTS

Total EASI, EASI on each anatomical site, EASI of each clinical sign, and Peak Pruritus Numerical-Rating Scale were markedly reduced at weeks 4 or 12 compared with week 0. After the dose increase, the achievement rates of EASI 75 and EASI 90 significantly improved; EASI 75 4.3%, 68.2%, and 66.7%; EASI 90 0%, 18.2%, and 38.1% at weeks 0, 4, and 12, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that upadacitinib 30 mg can ameliorate rash and pruritus insufficiently improved by upadacitinib 15 mg, and that the dose increase to 30 mg may be considered as a treatment option for patients with atopic dermatitis with a limited response to upadacitinib 15 mg.

Navigating the atopic dermatitis toolbox: Challenging scenarios and shared decision-making

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory disease with a complex pathogenesis and heterogeneous clinical presentation. Recently, multiple advanced therapies were approved for the treatment of moderate-severe AD, including the biologics dupilumab, tralokinumab, and lebrikizumab and oral Janus kinase inhibitors abrocitinib, upadacitinib, and baricitinib. These treatments have different efficacy, safety, and tolerability profiles and monitoring requirements. The availability of multiple recently approved therapies poses a clinical challenge for health care providers and patients on how to select the best treatment for patients. This article aims to highlight clinical considerations and patient perspectives to guide shared decision-making for biologic and oral systemic therapy, particularly Janus kinase inhibitors, in AD. Important aspects to consider include treatment goals, medical history, symptom severity, physician assessments, safety profile of drugs, and the risk predispositions in patients.

Real-world Experience of Abrocitinib Treatment in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis and Hand Eczema: Up to 28-week Results from the BioDay Registry

Limited daily practice data on the effect of abrocitinib in patients with atopic dermatitis are available. The aim of this multicentre prospective study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of abrocitinib in patients with atopic dermatitis treated in daily practice. In a subgroup, the effectiveness of abrocitinib on hand eczema was evaluated. A total of 103 patients from the BioDay registry were included in the study: week 4 (n = 95), week 16 (n = 61) and week 28 (n = 39). At week 28, the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI)-50/75/90 was achieved by 81.8%, 57.6%, and 18.2%, respectively, and the weekly average pruritus numerical rating scale ≤ 4 by 62.9%. The effectiveness of abrocitinib was not significantly different between dupilumab non-responders and dupilumab-naïve patients/responders, and between upadacitinib non-responders and upadacitinib-naïve patients/responders. Mean ± standard deviation Hand Eczema Severity Index decreased from 27.4 ± 27.7 at baseline to 7.7 ± 12.1 at week 28 (n = 31). Thirty-two patients (31.1%) discontinued treatment due to ineffectiveness (n = 17), adverse events (n = 9) or both (n = 3). The most frequently reported adverse event was nausea (n = 28). In conclusion, abrocitinib is an effective treatment for atopic dermatitis and can be effective for patients with previous inadequate response to dupilumab or upadacitinib. Furthermore, hand eczema can improve in patients treated with abrocitinib for atopic dermatitis.