1
|
Al-Kuraishy HM, Jabir MS, Albuhadily AK, Al-Gareeb AI, Jawad SF, Swelum AA, Hadi NR. Role of ketogenic diet in neurodegenerative diseases focusing on Alzheimer diseases: The guardian angle. Ageing Res Rev 2024; 95:102233. [PMID: 38360180 DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2024.102233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2024] [Revised: 02/11/2024] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/17/2024]
Abstract
The ketogenic diet (KD) is a low-carbohydrate, adequate protein and high-fat diet. KD is primarily used to treat refractory epilepsy. KD was shown to be effective in treating different neurodegenerative diseases. Alzheimer disease (AD) is the first common neurodegenerative disease in the world characterized by memory and cognitive impairment. However, the underlying mechanism of KD in controlling of AD and other neurodegenerative diseases are not discussed widely. Therefore, this review aims to revise the fundamental mechanism of KD in different neurodegenerative diseases focusing on the AD. KD induces a fasting-like which modulates the central and peripheral metabolism by regulating mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, inflammation, gut-flora, and autophagy in different neurodegenerative diseases. Different studies highlighted that KD improves AD neuropathology by regulating synaptic neurotransmission and inhibiting of neuroinflammation and oxidative stress. In conclusion, KD improves cognitive function and attenuates the progression of AD neuropathology by reducing oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and enhancing neuronal autophagy and brain BDNF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hayder M Al-Kuraishy
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Medicine, College of Medicine, Mustansiriyah University, Baghdad, Iraq.
| | - Majid S Jabir
- Department of Applied Science, University of Technology Iraq.
| | - Ali K Albuhadily
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Medicine, College of Medicine, Mustansiriyah University, Baghdad, Iraq.
| | - Ali I Al-Gareeb
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Medicine, College of Medicine, Mustansiriyah University, Baghdad, Iraq; Jabir Ibn Hayyan Medical University, Al-Ameer Qu./Najaf-iraq, PO.Box13, Kufa, Iraq.
| | - Sabrean F Jawad
- Department of Pharmacy, Al-Mustaqbal University College, Hillah, Babylon, 51001, Iraq.
| | - Ayman A Swelum
- Department of Animal Production, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Liguori C, Santamarina E, Strzelczyk A, Rodríguez-Uranga JJ, Shankar R, Rodríguez-Osorio X, Auvin S, Bonanni P, Trinka E, McMurray R, Sáinz-Fuertes R, Villanueva V. Perampanel outcomes at different stages of treatment in people with focal and generalized epilepsy treated in clinical practice: Evidence from the PERMIT study. Front Neurol 2023; 14:1120150. [PMID: 37064177 PMCID: PMC10098362 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1120150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 04/03/2023] Open
Abstract
IntroductionThe PERMIT study is the largest pooled analysis of perampanel (PER) clinical practice data conducted to date.MethodsThis post-hoc analysis of PERMIT investigated the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of PER when used as early add-on therapy (after failure of one or two previous antiseizure medications) in comparison with late add-on therapy (after failure of three or more previous antiseizure medications). Retention and effectiveness were assessed after 3, 6, and 12 months, and at the last visit (last observation carried forward). Effectiveness was assessed by seizure type (total seizures, focal seizures, generalized tonic-clonic seizures [GTCS]) and assessments included seizure freedom rate and responder rate. Safety and tolerability were assessed by evaluating adverse events (AEs) and discontinuation due to AEs.ResultsThe Full Analysis Set included 1184 and 2861 PWE treated with PER as early and late add-on therapy, respectively. Compared to the late add-on subgroup, the early add-on subgroup was characterized by later mean age at epilepsy onset, shorter mean duration of epilepsy, lower rates of intellectual disability and psychiatric comorbidity, and lower frequency of seizures per month, suggesting a less severe form of epilepsy in this subgroup. After 12 months, retention was significantly higher in the early versus late add-on subgroup (67.7% vs. 62.4%; p = 0.004). At the last visit, responder rates in the early versus late add-on subgroup were significantly higher for total seizures (68.2% vs. 39.3%; p < 0.001), focal seizures (65.0% vs. 36.8%; p < 0.001) and GTCS (83.7% vs. 67.2%; p < 0.001), as were seizure freedom rates (total seizures, 35.9% vs. 11.9% [p < 0.001]; focal seizures, 29.4% vs. 8.7% [p < 0.001]; GTCS, 69.0% vs. 48.1% [p < 0.001]). Incidence of AEs was significantly lower in the early versus late add-on subgroup (42.1% vs. 54.7%; p < 0.001), as was the rate of discontinuation due to AEs over 12 months (15.0% vs. 18.1%; p = 0.031).DiscussionThis study demonstrated that PER was effective and generally well tolerated when initiated as early or late add-on therapy, but it was significantly more effective and better tolerated when initiated early. These findings support PER's use as a broad-spectrum, early add-on therapy for use in PWE with focal and generalized seizures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudio Liguori
- Epilepsy Centre, Neurology Unit, University Hospital “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy
- Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy
- *Correspondence: Claudio Liguori
| | - Estevo Santamarina
- Epilepsy Unit, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Adam Strzelczyk
- Epilepsy Center Frankfurt Rhine-Main, Department of Neurology, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | | | - Rohit Shankar
- Peninsula School of Medicine, Plymouth, United Kingdom
| | - Xiana Rodríguez-Osorio
- Department of Neurology, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, Santiago, Spain
| | - Stéphane Auvin
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM NeuroDiderot, Paris, France
- APHP, Robert Debré University Hospital, Pediatric Neurology Department, CRMR Epilepsies Rares, EpiCare Member, Paris, France
- Institut Universitaire de France (IUF), Paris, France
| | - Paolo Bonanni
- Epilpesy and Clinical Neurophysiology Unit, Scientific Institute, IRCCS Eugenio Medea, Conegliano, Treviso, Italy
| | - Eugen Trinka
- Department of Neurology, Christian-Doppler University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Member of EpiCARE, Salzburg, Austria
- Neuroscience Institute, Christian-Doppler University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Salzburg, Austria
- Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision-Making and HTA, UMIT–Private University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tyrol, Austria
| | | | | | - Vicente Villanueva
- Refractory Epilepsy Unit, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lattanzi S, Canafoglia L, Canevini MP, Casciato S, Cerulli Irelli E, Chiesa V, Dainese F, De Maria G, Didato G, Di Gennaro G, Falcicchio G, Fanella M, Ferlazzo E, Gangitano M, La Neve A, Mecarelli O, Montalenti E, Morano A, Piazza F, Pizzanelli C, Pulitano P, Ranzato F, Rosati E, Tassi L, Di Bonaventura C. Brivaracetam as Early Add-On Treatment in Patients with Focal Seizures: A Retrospective, Multicenter, Real-World Study. Neurol Ther 2022; 11:1789-1804. [PMID: 36109431 PMCID: PMC9588144 DOI: 10.1007/s40120-022-00402-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 08/24/2022] [Indexed: 10/14/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In randomized controlled trials, add-on brivaracetam (BRV) reduced seizure frequency in patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Most real-world research on BRV has focused on refractory epilepsy. The aim of this analysis was to assess the 12-month effectiveness and tolerability of adjunctive BRV when used as early or late adjunctive treatment in patients included in the BRIVAracetam add-on First Italian netwoRk Study (BRIVAFIRST). METHODS BRIVAFIRST was a 12-month retrospective, multicenter study including adult patients prescribed adjunctive BRV. Effectiveness outcomes included the rates of sustained seizure response, sustained seizure freedom, and treatment discontinuation. Safety and tolerability outcomes included the rate of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs) and the incidence of AEs. Data were compared for patients treated with add-on BRV after 1-2 (early add-on) and ≥ 3 (late add-on) prior antiseizure medications. RESULTS A total of 1029 patients with focal epilepsy were included in the study, of whom 176 (17.1%) received BRV as early add-on treatment. The median daily dose of BRV at 12 months was 125 (100-200) mg in the early add-on group and 200 (100-200) in the late add-on group (p < 0.001). Sustained seizure response was reached by 97/161 (60.3%) of patients in the early add-on group and 286/833 (34.3%) of patients in the late add-on group (p < 0.001). Sustained seizure freedom was achieved by 51/161 (31.7%) of patients in the early add-on group and 91/833 (10.9%) of patients in the late add-on group (p < 0.001). During the 1-year study period, 29 (16.5%) patients in the early add-on group and 241 (28.3%) in the late add-on group discontinued BRV (p = 0.001). Adverse events were reported by 38.7% and 28.5% (p = 0.017) of patients who received BRV as early and late add-on treatment, respectively. CONCLUSION Brivaracetam was effective and well tolerated both as first add-on and late adjunctive treatment in patients with focal epilepsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simona Lattanzi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Neurological Clinic, Marche Polytechnic University, Via Conca 71, 60020, Ancona, Italy.
| | - Laura Canafoglia
- Department of Epileptology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Paola Canevini
- Child Neuropsychiatry Unit, Epilepsy Center, AAST Santi Paolo Carlo, Milan, Italy
- Department of Health Sciences, Università degli Studi, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Emanuele Cerulli Irelli
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Valentina Chiesa
- Child Neuropsychiatry Unit, Epilepsy Center, AAST Santi Paolo Carlo, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Giovanni De Maria
- Clinical Neurophysiology Unit, Epilepsy Center, Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Didato
- Epilepsy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico "Carlo Besta", Milan, Italy
| | | | - Giovanni Falcicchio
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neurosciences and Sense Organs, University Hospital of Bari "A. Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Martina Fanella
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Edoardo Ferlazzo
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Græcia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Massimo Gangitano
- Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience, and Advanced Diagnostic (BIND), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Angela La Neve
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neurosciences and Sense Organs, University Hospital of Bari "A. Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Oriano Mecarelli
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Elisa Montalenti
- Epilepsy Center, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Alessandra Morano
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Federico Piazza
- "Rita Levi Montalcini" Department of Neurosciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Chiara Pizzanelli
- Department of Translational Research on New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- Neurology Unit, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Patrizia Pulitano
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Eleonora Rosati
- Department Neurology 2, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Laura Tassi
- "C. Munari" Epilepsy Surgery Centre, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Di Bonaventura
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Adjunctive Brivaracetam in Older Patients with Focal Seizures: Evidence from the BRIVAracetam add‑on First Italian netwoRk Study (BRIVAFIRST). Drugs Aging 2022; 39:297-304. [PMID: 35344198 PMCID: PMC8995268 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-022-00931-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Background The management of epilepsy in older adults has become part of daily practice because of an aging population. Older patients with epilepsy represent a distinct and more vulnerable clinical group as compared with younger patients, and they are generally under-represented in randomized placebo-controlled trials. Real-world studies can therefore be a useful complement to characterize the drug’s profile. Brivaracetam is a rationally developed compound characterized by high-affinity binding to synaptic vesicle protein 2A and approved as adjunctive therapy for focal seizures in adults with epilepsy. Objective The aim of this study was to assess the 12-month effectiveness and tolerability of adjunctive brivaracetam in older patients (≥65 years of age) with epilepsy treated in a real-world setting. Methods The BRIVAFIRST (BRIVAracetam add-on First Italian netwoRk STudy) was a 12-month retrospective multicenter study including adult patients prescribed adjunctive brivaracetam. Effectiveness outcomes included the rates of seizure response (≥50% reduction in baseline seizure frequency), seizure freedom, and treatment discontinuation. Safety and tolerability outcomes included the rate of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events and the incidence of adverse events. Data were compared for patients aged ≥65 years of age (‘older’) vs those aged <65 years (‘younger’). Results There were 1029 patients with focal epilepsy included in the study, of whom 111 (10.8%) were aged ≥65 years. The median daily dose of brivaracetam at 3 months was 100 [interquartile range, 100–175] mg in the older group and 100 [100–200] mg in the younger group (p = 0.036); it was 150 [100–200] mg in both groups either at 6 months (p = 0.095) or 12 months (p = 0.140). At 12 months, 49 (44.1%) older and 334 (36.4%) younger patients had a reduction in their baseline seizure frequency by at least 50% (p = 0.110), and the seizure freedom rates were 35/111 (31.5%) and 134/918 (14.6%) in older and younger groups, respectively (p < 0.001). During the 1-year study period, 20 (18.0%) patients in the older group and 245 (26.7%) patients in the younger group discontinued brivaracetam (p = 0.048). Treatment withdrawal because of insufficient efficacy was less common in older than younger patients [older: n = 7 (6.3%), younger: n = 152 (16.6%); p = 0.005]. Adverse events were reported by 24.2% of older patients and 30.8% of younger patients (p = 0.185); the most common adverse events were somnolence, nervousness and/or agitation, vertigo, and fatigue in both study groups. Conclusions Adjunctive brivaracetam was efficacious, had good tolerability, and no new or unexpected safety signals emerged when used to treat older patients with uncontrolled focal seizures in clinical practice. Adjunctive brivaracetam can be a suitable therapeutic option in this special population.
Collapse
|
5
|
Han YZ, Guo YM, Xiong P, Ge FL, Jing J, Niu M, Zhao X, Bai ZF, Song HB, Xiao XH, Wang JB. Age-Associated Risk of Liver-Related Adverse Drug Reactions. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:832557. [PMID: 35372391 PMCID: PMC8968752 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.832557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2021] [Accepted: 02/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Aging population is generally considered more sensitive to adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Yet, big data-based quantitative evidence currently does not exist to support this concept. This study aims to investigate age-associated risks of liver-related ADR (L-ADR). Methods Spontaneous reporting data from 2012 to 2016 were retrieved from the China National ADR Monitoring System. The risk ratio (RR) was used to quantify the relative risk of L-ADR of each age group. The reporting odds ratio (ROR) was used to quantify the correlation with the risk of L-ADR of each drug category or drug in older adults. Results Totally, 64,702 L-ADR reports were retrieved, covering ages from 1 to 116, with a median age of 49. The RR values increased exponentially with the increase of age, which indicates that the relative risk of L-ADR increased by 33% for every 10-year increase in age. The age cutoff point for relative high risk of L-ADR was estimated at 52.0 years old (RR = 1). In 17 categories composed of 270 drugs, the top 3 drug categories with a high correlation to the risk of L-ADR in older adults were antiarrhythmic (ROR, 5.75; 95% CI: 4.45–7.42), antilipemic (ROR, 4.77; 95% CI: 4.53–5.02), and antihypertensive (ROR, 2.97; 95% CI: 2.59–3.41). Conclusions This research illustrates quantitatively that aging is a potential risk factor for L-ADR, with a 33% increase in relative risk for every 10-year increase in age. Risk management should be addressed for older adults when those drugs with a high correlation to the risk of L-ADR are used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan-zhong Han
- College of Pharmacy, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China
- China Military Institute of Chinese Medicine, Fifth Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yu-ming Guo
- China Military Institute of Chinese Medicine, Fifth Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Peng Xiong
- China Military Institute of Chinese Medicine, Fifth Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Fei-lin Ge
- China Military Institute of Chinese Medicine, Fifth Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jing Jing
- China Military Institute of Chinese Medicine, Fifth Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Ming Niu
- China Military Institute of Chinese Medicine, Fifth Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xu Zhao
- China Military Institute of Chinese Medicine, Fifth Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Zhao-fang Bai
- China Military Institute of Chinese Medicine, Fifth Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Hai-bo Song
- National Center for Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring, Beijing, China
- Hai-bo Song
| | - Xiao-he Xiao
- China Military Institute of Chinese Medicine, Fifth Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
- Xiao-he Xiao
| | - Jia-bo Wang
- China Military Institute of Chinese Medicine, Fifth Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
- School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- *Correspondence: Jia-bo Wang
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lattanzi S, Ascoli M, Canafoglia L, Canevini MP, Casciato S, Cerulli Irelli E, Chiesa V, Dainese F, De Maria G, Didato G, Di Gennaro G, Falcicchio G, Fanella M, Gangitano M, La Neve A, Mecarelli O, Montalenti E, Morano A, Piazza F, Pizzanelli C, Pulitano P, Ranzato F, Rosati E, Tassi L, Di Bonaventura C, Alicino A, Assenza G, Avorio F, Badioni V, Banfi P, Bartolini E, Manfredi Basili L, Belcastro V, Beretta S, Berto I, Biggi M, Billo G, Boero G, Bonanni P, Bongiorno J, Brigo F, Caggia E, Cagnetti C, Calvello C, Cesnik E, Chianale G, Ciampanelli D, Ciuffini R, Cocito D, Colella D, Contento M, Costa C, Cumbo E, D'Aniello A, Deleo F, DiFrancesco JC, Di Giacomo R, Di Liberto A, Domina E, Donato F, Dono F, Durante V, Elia M, Estraneo A, Evangelista G, Teresa Faedda M, Failli Y, Fallica E, Fattouch J, Ferrari A, Ferreri F, Fisco G, Fonti D, Fortunato F, Foschi N, Francavilla T, Galli R, Gasparini S, Gazzina S, Teresa Giallonardo A, Sean Giorgi F, Giuliano L, Habetswallner F, Izzi F, Kassabian B, Kiferle L, Labate A, Luisi C, Magliani M, Maira G, Mari L, Marino D, Mascia A, Mazzeo A, Meletti S, Milano C, Nilo A, Orlando B, Paladin F, Grazia Pascarella M, Pastori C, Pauletto G, Peretti A, Perri G, Pezzella M, Piccioli M, Pignatta P, Pilolli N, Pisani F, Rosa Pisani L, Placidi F, Pollicino P, Porcella V, Puligheddu M, Quadri S, Paolo Quarato P, Quintas R, Renna R, Rum A, Michele Salamone E, Savastano E, Sessa M, Stokelj D, Tartara E, Tombini M, Tumminelli G, Elisabetta Vaudano A, Ventura M, Viganò I, Viglietta E, Vignoli A, Villani F, Zambrelli E, Zummo L. Sustained seizure freedom with adjunctive brivaracetam in patients with focal‐onset seizures. Epilepsia 2022; 63:e42-e50. [PMID: 35278335 PMCID: PMC9311068 DOI: 10.1111/epi.17223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2022] [Revised: 03/06/2022] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Simona Lattanzi
- Neurological Clinic Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine Marche Polytechnic University Ancona Italy
| | - Michele Ascoli
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences Magna Græcia University of Catanzaro Catanzaro Italy
| | - Laura Canafoglia
- Department of Epileptology Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta Milan Italy
| | - Maria Paola Canevini
- Epilepsy Center Child Neuropsychiatry Unit AAST Santi Paolo Carlo Milan Italy
- Department of Health Sciences Università degli Studi Milan Italy
| | | | | | - Valentina Chiesa
- Epilepsy Center Child Neuropsychiatry Unit AAST Santi Paolo Carlo Milan Italy
| | | | - Giovanni De Maria
- Clinical Neurophysiology Unit, Epilepsy Center Spedali Civili Brescia Italy
| | - Giuseppe Didato
- Epilepsy Unit Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico "Carlo Besta" Milan Italy
| | | | - Giovanni Falcicchio
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences Neurosciences and Sense Organs‐ University Hospital of Bari “A. Moro”
| | - Martina Fanella
- Department of Human Neurosciences Policlinico Umberto I Sapienza University of Rome Italy
| | - Massimo Gangitano
- Department of Biomedicine Neuroscience, and advanced Diagnostic (BIND) University of Palermo Palermo Italy
| | - Angela La Neve
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences Neurosciences and Sense Organs‐ University Hospital of Bari “A. Moro”
| | - Oriano Mecarelli
- Department of Human Neurosciences Policlinico Umberto I Sapienza University of Rome Italy
| | - Elisa Montalenti
- Epilepsy Center AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino Turin Italy
| | - Alessandra Morano
- Department of Human Neurosciences Policlinico Umberto I Sapienza University of Rome Italy
| | - Federico Piazza
- Rita Levi Montalcini Department of Neurosciences University of Turin Turin Italy
| | - Chiara Pizzanelli
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine Neurological Clinic University of Pisa Pisa, Pisa Italy
| | - Patrizia Pulitano
- Department of Human Neurosciences Policlinico Umberto I Sapienza University of Rome Italy
| | | | - Eleonora Rosati
- Department Neurology 2 Careggi University Hospital Florence Italy
| | - Laura Tassi
- "C. Munari" Epilepsy Surgery Centre Niguarda Hospital Milan Italy
| | - Carlo Di Bonaventura
- Department of Human Neurosciences Policlinico Umberto I Sapienza University of Rome Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Magalhães LM, Costa R, Vieira M, Moreira J, Gama H, Soares-da-Silva P. Safety of Eslicarbazepine Acetate in Elderly Versus Non-Elderly Patients with Focal Seizures: From Pooled Data of Clinical Studies to 8 Years of Post-Marketing Experience. Drug Saf 2021; 44:1099-1107. [PMID: 34536187 PMCID: PMC8473370 DOI: 10.1007/s40264-021-01097-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Introduction The prevalence of epilepsy increases in elderly patients aged > 65 years, and treatment is challenging because clinical data are limited. Objective Our objective was to evaluate the safety of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) in patients aged ≥ 65 years versus non-elderly patients with focal seizures. Methods The safety data of seven phase II and III, double-blind, open-label, randomized clinical studies of ESL in adults were pooled. At least possibly related treatmentemergent adverse events (TEAEs) and ESL post-marketing adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were analyzed separately by age categories. Results The most frequently reported at least possibly related TEAEs in elderly (N = 120) versus non-elderly patients (N = 1863) were dizziness (10.8 vs. 20.3%), somnolence (9.2 vs. 12.6%), and hyponatremia (6.7 vs. 1.5%). Elderly patients presented a higher incidence of serious TEAEs (22.5 vs. 7.6%) and at least possibly related serious TEAEs (6.7 vs. 2.5%), probably because treatment was complicated by comorbidities and comedications. After an estimated cumulative exposure of over 2 million patient-months worldwide and 8 years of post-marketing surveillance, hyponatremia was the most frequently reported ADR (n = 232), accounting for 14.6% and 6.8% of the ADRs reported in elderly (n = 473) and non-elderly patients (n = 2406), respectively. This was followed by ADR/safety information such as drug–dose titration not performed (7.0 vs. 5.4%), product use in unapproved indication (4.9 vs. 1.9%), off-label use (3.4 vs. 2.2%), dizziness (3.4 vs. 3.5%), and seizure (2.1 vs. 5.8%). Conclusion No specific safety issue was identified from the pooled studies for elderly compared with non-elderly patients. After 8 years of post-marketing surveillance, the qualitative safety of ESL remains similar to that observed in the clinical studies. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40264-021-01097-5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luís M Magalhães
- Division of Research and Development, Bial-Portela & Cª, S.A., À Avenida da Siderurgia Nacional, 4745‑457, Coronado (S. Romão e S. Mamede), Portugal.
| | - Raquel Costa
- Division of Research and Development, Bial-Portela & Cª, S.A., À Avenida da Siderurgia Nacional, 4745‑457, Coronado (S. Romão e S. Mamede), Portugal
| | - Mariana Vieira
- Division of Research and Development, Bial-Portela & Cª, S.A., À Avenida da Siderurgia Nacional, 4745‑457, Coronado (S. Romão e S. Mamede), Portugal
| | - Joana Moreira
- Division of Research and Development, Bial-Portela & Cª, S.A., À Avenida da Siderurgia Nacional, 4745‑457, Coronado (S. Romão e S. Mamede), Portugal
| | - Helena Gama
- Division of Research and Development, Bial-Portela & Cª, S.A., À Avenida da Siderurgia Nacional, 4745‑457, Coronado (S. Romão e S. Mamede), Portugal
| | - Patrício Soares-da-Silva
- Division of Research and Development, Bial-Portela & Cª, S.A., À Avenida da Siderurgia Nacional, 4745‑457, Coronado (S. Romão e S. Mamede), Portugal.,Department of Biomedicine, Unit of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.,MedInUP‑Center for Drug Discovery and Innovative Medicines, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
PERMIT study: a global pooled analysis study of the effectiveness and tolerability of perampanel in routine clinical practice. J Neurol 2021; 269:1957-1977. [PMID: 34427754 PMCID: PMC8940799 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-021-10751-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Revised: 08/03/2021] [Accepted: 08/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
The PERaMpanel pooled analysIs of effecTiveness and tolerability (PERMIT) study was a pooled analysis of data from 44 real-world studies from 17 countries, in which people with epilepsy (PWE; focal and generalized) were treated with perampanel (PER). Retention and effectiveness were assessed after 3, 6, and 12 months, and at the last visit (last observation carried forward). Effectiveness assessments included 50% responder rate (≥ 50% reduction in seizure frequency from baseline) and seizure freedom rate (no seizures since at least the prior visit); in PWE with status epilepticus, response was defined as seizures under control. Safety and tolerability were assessed by evaluating adverse events (AEs) and discontinuation due to AEs. The Full Analysis Set included 5193 PWE. Retention, effectiveness and safety/tolerability were assessed in 4721, 4392 and 4617, respectively. Retention on PER treatment at 3, 6, and 12 months was 90.5%, 79.8%, and 64.2%, respectively. Mean retention time on PER treatment was 10.8 months. The 50% responder rate was 58.3% at 12 months and 50.0% at the last visit, and the corresponding seizure freedom rates were 23.2% and 20.5%, respectively; 52.7% of PWE with status epilepticus responded to PER treatment. Overall, 49.9% of PWE reported AEs and the most frequently reported AEs (≥ 5% of PWE) were dizziness/vertigo (15.2%), somnolence (10.6%), irritability (8.4%), and behavioral disorders (5.4%). At 12 months, 17.6% of PWEs had discontinued due to AEs. PERMIT demonstrated that PER is effective and generally well tolerated when used to treat people with focal and/or generalized epilepsy in everyday clinical practice.
Collapse
|
9
|
Sales F, Delanty N, Mecarelli O, Holtkamp M, McMurray R, Loureiro R, Fernandes H, Villanueva V. Predictors of seizure freedom, response and retention after 12 months of treatment with eslicarbazepine acetate: A post-hoc analysis of the Euro-Esli study. Epilepsy Res 2021; 174:106653. [PMID: 34049227 DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2021.106653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Revised: 04/22/2021] [Accepted: 05/02/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a once-daily antiseizure medication (ASM) that is approved in Europe and the USA for the treatment of focal-onset seizures. The Euro-Esli study, which included over 2000 patients, investigated the real-world effectiveness, safety and tolerability of ESL when used in everyday clinical practice in Europe. This post-hoc analysis of Euro-Esli employed univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression analyses to investigate the relationship between demographic and baseline characteristics (including epilepsy- and treatment-related factors) and the likelihood of seizure freedom, response and retention in adult patients with focal seizures after 12 months of ESL treatment in the real-world setting. Multivariate analysis revealed that the factors associated with seizure freedom and response at 12 months (N = 1054) were generally those characterising patients who were relatively early in their disease course and/or less refractory to treatment, such as older age at onset of epilepsy, absence of seizures at baseline and lower number of concomitant ASMs at baseline. Although it was not possible to construct a multivariate model to predict retention on ESL treatment at 12 months, when the univariate regression model was adjusted for age and epilepsy duration, the factors found to be significantly associated with retention at 12 months (N = 1559) comprised shorter duration of epilepsy, absence of any seizures at baseline, lower baseline seizure frequency (<5 vs. ≥ 5 seizures/month), lower number of previous ASMs, lower number of concomitant ASMs, and the absence of concomitant use of lamotrigine at baseline. These findings therefore identify baseline characteristics that are predictive of the effectiveness of ESL treatment in clinical practice, which may help clinicians choose appropriate ASM therapy for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco Sales
- Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
| | - Norman Delanty
- Beaumont Hospital and School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, FutureNeuro Research Centre, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Oriano Mecarelli
- Sapienza University, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy.
| | - Martin Holtkamp
- Epilepsy‑Center Berlin‑Brandenburg, Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
| | | | - Rui Loureiro
- Bial - Portela & Cª, S.A., Coronado (S. Romão e S. Mamede), Portugal.
| | - Hélder Fernandes
- Bial - Portela & Cª, S.A., Coronado (S. Romão e S. Mamede), Portugal.
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Weissinger F, Losch F, Winter Y, Brecht S, Lendemans D, Kockelmann E. Effectiveness of eslicarbazepine acetate in dependency of baseline anticonvulsant therapy: Results from a German prospective multicenter clinical practice study. Epilepsy Behav 2019; 101:106574. [PMID: 31678808 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.106574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2019] [Revised: 08/23/2019] [Accepted: 09/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a third-generation antiepileptic drug (AED) approved as monotherapy for partial-onset seizures in adults and as adjunctive therapy in patients aged above 6 years in the European Union (EU). The prospective observational Zebinix Effects in DEpendency of BAseline Conditions (ZEDEBAC) study aimed at investigating the effectiveness of ESL in clinical practice, with ESL being administered as monotherapy (mono group), as only add-on to a current monotherapy (1+ group), or as add-on to ≥2 baseline AEDs (≥2+ group). In total, 237 patients were included, 35 in the mono group, 114 in the 1+, and 88 in the ≥2+ group. Six-month retention rates were 93.9%, 78.0%, and 75.3% in the mono, 1+, and ≥2+ group. There were 90.5%, 77.6%, and 48.3% of patients in the mono, 1+, and ≥2+ groups who were responders (patients with a ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency at follow-up vs. baseline). Seizure freedom rates were 81.5%, 47.9%, and 23.4%, respectively. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) occurred in 11.4% of patients of the mono, 19.3% of the 1+, and 28.4% of patients of the ≥2+ group. Hyponatremia was reported as ADR in 3.4% of all patients. Although baseline variables differed considerably, with most elderly patients with tumor-related and vascular etiologies in the mono group and most patients with refractory epilepsies with pronounced use of concomitant sodium channel blockers (SCBs) in the ≥2+ group, retention as a measure of real-life effectiveness turned out not to be substantially different and favorable in all groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Weissinger
- Epilepsy Centre, Department of Neurology, Vivantes Humboldt Hospital, Am Nordgraben 2, 13509 Berlin, Germany; Department of Neurology, Charité University Hospital, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Florian Losch
- Epilepsy Centre, Department of Neurology, Vivantes Humboldt Hospital, Am Nordgraben 2, 13509 Berlin, Germany
| | - Yaroslav Winter
- Mainz Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurology, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Silvia Brecht
- Eisai GmbH, Lyoner Str. 36, 60528 Frankfurt, Germany.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|