A Review of Population Pharmacokinetic Analyses of Linezolid

Impact of hepatic impairment and renal failure on the pharmacokinetics of linezolid and its metabolites: contribution of hepatic metabolism and renal excretion

Linezolid, an oxazolidinone antibiotic, is used in patients with liver or kidney disease. However, the effects and mechanisms of hepatic impairment or renal failure on the pharmacokinetics of linezolid and its metabolites (PNU-142586 and PNU-142300) remain unclear. We used carbon tetrachloride-induced impaired hepatic function and 5/6 nephrectomy-induced renal failure rat models to investigate linezolid and metabolite pharmacokinetics. Isolated primary rat hepatocytes were used to evaluate the impact of hepatic impairment or renal failure on linezolid metabolism. Uptake and efflux transport studies were also conducted. The influence of hepatic impairment or renal failure on the pharmacokinetics of linezolid and two metabolites did not differ between intragastric gavage and intravenous administration in rats. Linezolid did not accumulate in the brain, heart, lung, liver, kidney, and small intestinal tissues of the hepatic impairment or renal failure rats. And PNU-142300 did not accumulate in the liver or kidney tissue. Compared to the isolated normal rat hepatocytes, the in vitro hepatic clearance of linezolid in hepatic impairment and renal failure rat hepatocytes decreased by 61.3% and 44.1%, respectively. Organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP)1B1, OATP1B3, OATP2B1, Na+-taurocholate co-transporting polypeptide (NTCP), organic anion transporter (OAT)1, OAT3, multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 (MRP2), or multidrug resistance protein 1 (MDR) did not mediate linezolid transport. Hepatic impairment primarily increases linezolid exposure through reduced hepatic metabolism, whereas renal failure increases both linezolid and two metabolites exposure through reduced hepatic metabolism and renal glomerular filtration. These findings guide adjusting the dose of linezolid in patients with hepatic and renal insufficiency.

[Translated article] Drug dosing in obese critically ill patients, a literature review

INTRODUCTION

Obesity constitutes a global public health problem, and knowledge about drug dosing in obese patients is limited. Clinical trials in critically ill patients rarely include obese individuals, resulting in a lack of specific dosing information in product data sheets. The aim of this literature review is to provide clinicians with efficient and safe guidelines for this group of patients.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary group composed of pharmacists specialised in hospital pharmacy and physicians specialised in intensive care medicine was formed. The therapeutic groups and, in depth, the most commonly used active ingredients in the intensive care unit were identified and reviewed. The bibliographic review was carried out using terms such as: "obese", "overweight", "critical illness", "drug dosification", and "therapeutic dose monitoring". All the information was evaluated by the working group, which reached a consensus on dosing recommendations for each drug in obese critically ill patients.

RESULTS

Eighty three drugs belonging to the following therapeutic groups were identified: antivirals, antibacterials, antifungals, immunosuppressants, antiepileptics, vasopressors, anticoagulants, neuromuscular blocking agents, and sedatives. A table with the consensus dosing recommendation for each of these was produced after review.

CONCLUSIONS

Drug dosing in obese patients, both in critical and non-critical settings, remains an area with significant uncertainties. This review provides updated and exhaustive information on the dosing of the main therapeutic groups in obese critically ill patients, and is a useful tool for both physicians in critical care units and clinical pharmacists in their practice in this setting.

Drug dosing in obese critically ill patients, a literature review

INTRODUCTION

The prevalence of obesity represents a significant global public health challenge, and the available evidence concerning the appropriate dosing of pharmaceutical in patients with obesity is limited. It is uncommon for clinical trials in critically ill patients to include obese individuals, which results in a lack of specific dosing information in product data sheets. The objective of this literature review is to provide clinicians with efficacious and secure guidelines for this cohort of patients.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary team comprising pharmacists specialized in hospital pharmacy and physicians with expertise in intensive care medicine was established. The therapeutic groups and, in particular, the most commonly used active ingredients within the Intensive Care Unit were identified and subjected to detailed analysis. The following terms were included in the search: "obese", "overweight", "critical illness", "drug dosification", and "therapeutic dose monitoring". All the information was then evaluated by the working group, which reached a consensus on the dosing recommendations for each drug in obese critically ill patients.

RESULTS

A total of 83 drugs belonging to the following therapeutic groups were identified: antivirals, antibacterials, antifungals, immunosuppressants, antiepileptics, vasopressors, anticoagulants, neuromuscular blocking agents and sedatives. A table was produced containing the consensus dosing recommendations for each of the aforementioned drugs following a review of the available evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

Drug dosing in obese patients, both in critical and noncritical settings, remains an area with significant uncertainty. This review provides comprehensive and up-to-date information on the dosing of the main therapeutic groups in obese critically ill patients, offering a valuable resource physicians in critical care units and clinical pharmacists in their practice in this setting.

Anti-infectives in Pediatric Patients with Cystic Fibrosis: A Comprehensive Review of Population Pharmacokinetic Analyses

Pulmonary complications are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in pediatric patients with cystic fibrosis. Altered pharmacokinetic parameters in this population, as well as high inter- and intra-individual variability, complicate the optimization of anti-infective treatments. In this review, we aim to summarize and describe all anti-infective population pharmacokinetic (popPK) models applied to pediatric populations with cystic fibrosis. Our objectives were to identify the most-reported structural models and retained covariates and to compare the dosing regimens used in clinical routine with those recommended in literature and guidelines. A literature search was done through the PubMed database from inception to August 2024. Studies were retained only if they complied with the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The review included 21 popPK models covering the pharmacokinetic profiles of eight different molecules. Among these, five are recommended antibiotics for treating pulmonary infections in patients with cystic fibrosis. All models incorporated body composition and/or renal function measures as covariates in their pharmacokinetic parameter equations. Standard dosing regimens in the studies were consistent with guidelines and literature recommendations. This is the first review summarizing and describing all anti-infective popPK models in pediatric patients with cystic fibrosis. Improved estimation of pharmacokinetic parameters and a clearer understanding of variability sources will enhance the optimization of antibiotic treatment in clinical practice. Finally, the impact of new targeted therapies on the management of this population will have to be closely monitored in the years ahead.

Optimizing the dosing regimens of linezolid against gram-positive cocci in critically ill patients with different renal functions: a Monte Carlo simulation

To promote the accurate administration of linezolid, this study aimed to evaluate its dosage regimens in critically ill patients with varying renal functions. This evaluation was based on a combined analysis of pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamic (PD), and toxicodynamic (TD) indices. The percentage of therapeutic target attainment (PTTA) was used as the index for PK/PD/TD, defined as simultaneously meeting two PK/PD criteria (AUC0-24h/MIC ≥ 100 and Css between 2.6-7.8 mg/L) and adjusted for toxicity probability, with MICs ranging from 0.5 to 8 mg/L. The recommended doses of linezolid for patients: 600 mg every 12 h for normal renal function or mild renal impairment, 300 mg every 12 h for severe renal impairment, 450 mg every 12 h for moderate renal impairment, and 600 mg every 8 h for supra-normal renal function. In conclusion, specific dosing regimens should be adopted for patients with varying renal functions, combined with therapeutic drug monitoring, to ensure the safety and efficacy of linezolid.

Evaluation and application of population pharmacokinetic models for optimising linezolid treatment in non-adherence multidrug-resistant tuberculosis patients

BACKGROUND

Population pharmacokinetic (popPK) models can optimise linezolid dosage regimens in patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB); however, unknown cross-centre precision and poor adherence remain problematic. This study aimed to assess the predictive ability of published models and use the most suitable model to optimise dosage regimens and manage compliance.

METHODS

One hundred fifty-eight linezolid plasma concentrations from 27 patients with MDR-TB were used to assess the predictive performance of published models. Prediction-based metrics and simulation-based visual predictive checks were conducted to evaluate predictive ability. Individualised remedial dosing regimens for various delayed scenarios were optimised using the most suitable model and Monte Carlo simulations. The influence of covariates, scheduled dosing intervals, and patient compliance were assessed.

RESULTS

Seven popPK models were identified. Body weight and creatinine clearance were the most frequently identified covariates influencing linezolid clearance. The model with the best performance had a median prediction error (PE%) of -1.62 %, median absolute PE of 29.50 %, and percentages of PE within 20 % (F20, 36.97 %) and 30 % (F30, 51.26 %). Monte Carlo simulations indicated that a twice-daily 300 mg linezolid dose may be more efficient than 600 mg once daily. For the 'typical' patient treated with 300 mg twice daily, half the dosage should be taken after a delay of ≥ 3 h.

CONCLUSIONS

Monte Carlo simulations based on popPK models can propose remedial regimens for delayed doses of linezolid in patients with MDR-TB. Model-based compliance management patterns are useful for balancing efficacy, adverse reactions, and resistance suppression.

[Establishment of a population pharmacokinetic model for linezolid in neonates with sepsis]

OBJECTIVES

To establish the pharmacokinetic model of linezolid in neonates, and to optimize the administration regimen.

METHODS

A prospective study was conducted among 64 neonates with sepsis who received linezolid as anti-infective therapy, and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was used to measure the plasma concentration of the drug. Clinical data were collected, and nonlinear mixed effects modeling was used to establish a population pharmacokinetic (PPK) model. Monte Carlo simulation and evaluation was performed for the optimal administration regimen of children with different features.

RESULTS

The pharmacokinetic properties of linezolid in neonates could be described by a single-compartment model with primary elimination, and the population typical values for apparent volume of distribution and clearance rate were 0.79 L and 0.34 L/h, respectively. The results of goodness of fit, visualization verification, and the Bootstrap method showed that the model was robust with reliable results of parameter estimation and prediction. Monte Carlo simulation results showed that the optimal administration regimen for linezolid in neonates was as follows: 6 mg/kg, q8h, at 28 weeks of gestational age (GA); 8 mg/kg, q8h, at 32 weeks of GA; 9 mg/kg, q8h, at 34-37 weeks of GA; 11 mg/kg, q8h, at 40 weeks of GA.

CONCLUSIONS

The PPK model established in this study can provide a reference for individual administration of linezolid in neonates. GA and body weight at the time of administration are significant influencing factors for the clearance rate of linezolid in neonates.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of linezolid in Chinese premature neonates: a population pharmacokinetic analysis and dosage optimization

This study aimed to develop a pharmacokinetic model of linezolid in premature neonates and evaluate and optimize the administration regimen. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was used to detect the blood concentration data of 54 premature neonates after intravenous administration of linezolid, and the relevant clinical data were collected. The population pharmacokinetic (PPK) model was established by nonlinear mixed effects modeling. Based on the final model parameters, the optimal administration regimen of linezolid in premature neonates with different body surface areas (BSA) was simulated and evaluated. The pharmacokinetic properties of linezolid in premature neonates are best described by a single-compartment model with primary elimination. The population typical values for apparent volume of distribution and clearance were 0.783 L and 0.154 L/h, respectively. BSA was a statistically significant covariate with clearance (CL) and volume of distribution (Vd). Monte Carlo simulations showed that the optimal administration regimen for linezolid in premature neonates was 6 mg/kg q8h for BSA 0.11 m2, 7 mg/kg q8h for BSA 0.13 m2, and 9 mg/kg q8h for BSA 0.15 m2 with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ≤1 mg/L, 7 mg/kg q8h for BSA 0.11 m2, 8 mg/kg q8h for BSA 0.13 m2, and 10 mg/kg q8h for BSA 0.15 m2 with MIC = 2 mg/L. A pharmacokinetic model was developed to predict the blood concentration on linezolid in premature neonates. Based on this model, the optimal administration regimen of linezolid in premature neonates needs to be individualized according to different BSA levels.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Linezolid Tablets of 2 Different Manufacturers in Healthy Chinese Subjects in Fasting and Fed States

This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PKs) and safety of a generic drug, linezolid, compared to those of a reference drug in healthy Chinese subjects under both fasting and fed conditions. This was a randomized, open-label, 2-period, 2-sequence crossover study. The subjects received a single dose of the test or reference drug, linezolid (600 mg), in each period. The PK parameters were calculated using a non-compartmental method and compared between the 2 drugs. Bioequivalence was analyzed using geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of the 2 formulations and their corresponding 90% confidence intervals (CIs). The safety of the 2 formulations was assessed under both fasting and fed conditions. Forty-eight subjects completed the study, 24 each in the fasting and feeding groups. The average plasma concentration-time patterns of linezolid were similar for both medications under both conditions. The GMR and 90% CIs of the maximum plasma concentration and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve of linezolid were ranged from 0.80 to 1.25. Both drugs were well tolerated with a similar incidence of adverse drug reactions. In conclusion, the PK and safety profiles of the 2 formulations were comparable. Food intake did not influence the PK profiles of linezolid. These results suggest that the test drug can be used as an alternative to reference drugs.

Evaluation of pharmacokinetic target attainment and hematological toxicity of linezolid in pediatric patients

BACKGROUND

Linezolid is commonly used to treat severe and/or resistant Gram-positive infections. Few studies have assessed its pharmacokinetic (PK) target attainment in pediatrics.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the percentage of pediatrics achieving the PK targets of linezolid with standard dosing regimens and to assess the incidence and risk factors associated with its hematologic toxicity.

METHODS

This prospective observational study included pediatric patients aged 0-14 who received linezolid for suspected or proven Gram-positive infections. Linezolid trough concentrations and the 24-h area under the curve (AUC24) were estimated, and hematologic toxicity was assessed.

RESULTS

Seventeen pediatric patients (5 neonates and 12 older pediatrics) were included. A wide variability was observed in linezolid's trough and AUC24 (ranging from 0.5 to 14.4 mg/L and from 86 to 700 mg.h/L, respectively). The median AUC24 was significantly higher in neonates than older pediatrics (436 [350-574] vs. 200 [134-272] mg,h/L, P = 0.01). Out of all patients, only 41% achieved adequate drug exposure (AUC24 160-300 mg.h/L and trough 2-7 mg/L), with 24% having subtherapeutic, and 35% having higher-than-optimal exposures. Hematological toxicity was observed in 53% of cases. Identified risk factors include treatment duration over 7 days, baseline platelet counts below 150 × 109/L, sepsis/septic shock, and concomitant use of meropenem.

CONCLUSIONS

Linezolid's standard dosing failed to achieve its PK targets in approximately half of our pediatric cohort. Our findings highlight the complex interplay between the risk factors of linezolid-associated hematological toxicity and underscore the importance of its vigilant use and monitoring, particularly in pediatrics with concomitant multiple risk factors.

Safety and efficacy of personalised versus standard dosing of linezolid in patients with sepsis (SePkLin): a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised, controlled and superiority clinical trial protocol

INTRODUCTION

Linezolid is a broadly used antibiotic to treat complicated infections caused by gram-positive bacteria. Therapeutic drug monitoring of linezolid concentrations is recommended to maximise its efficacy and safety, mainly haematological toxicity. Different pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets have been proposed to improve linezolid exposure: the ratio of the area under the concentration-time curve during a 24-hour period to minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) between 80 and 120; percentage of time that the drug concentration remains above the MIC during a dosing interval greater than 85% and the trough concentration between 2 and 7 mg/L. This clinical trial aims to evaluate the safety, efficacy and the clinical and economic utility of personalised dosing of linezolid using Bayesian forecasting methods to attain pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets, known as model-informed precision dosing.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised, parallel, controlled, phase IV and low intervention trial. Participants will be randomly assigned 1:1 to each group (n=346 per group). Control group will receive the standard dose of linezolid. Intervention group will receive personalised dosage of linezolid based on pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic adjustments. The primary outcome will be the incidence of thrombocytopenia in both groups.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This protocol was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Investigation with Medicines of Galicia (code 2022/140) and authorised by the Spanish Agency for Medicines and Medical Devices. The trial is implemented in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the international ethical and scientific quality standard, the Good Clinical Practice. The results will be published in peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

EudraCT registration code: 2022-000144-30.

Linezolid Pharmacokinetics in Critically Ill Patients: Continuous Versus Intermittent Infusion

BACKGROUND

Linezolid has been found to have considerable interindividual variability, especially in critically ill patients, which can lead to suboptimal plasma concentration. To overcome this shortcoming, several solutions have been proposed. These include using loading dose, higher maintenance doses, and dose stratification according to the patient's particularities, therapeutic drug monitoring, and drug administration via continuous infusion (CI) instead of intermittent infusion (II). In the present study, we aim to compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of linezolid after administration as II versus CI to critically ill patients.

METHODS

In a prospective study conducted in an intensive care unit, we compared the same two daily doses of linezolid administered via II versus CI. The serum concentration was measured, and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated. The pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) indices for efficacy chosen were area under the concentration-time curve at steady state divided by the minimum inhibitory concentration over 80 (AUC24-48/MIC > 80).

RESULTS

Greater serum concentration variability was observed in the II group than in the CI group. The %T > MIC > 80% was achieved for MICs of 1 and 2 µg/mL 100% of the time, whereas for the II group, this was 93% and 73%, respectively. AUC24-48/MIC > 80 was reached in 100% of cases in the CI group compared with 87% in the II group for a MIC of 1 µg/mL.

CONCLUSIONS

The two infusion methods may be used comparably, but utilizing CI as an alternative to II may have potential benefits, including avoiding periods of suboptimal concentrations, which may enhance safety profiles and clinical outcomes. Considering the relatively few studies performed on linezolid to date, which are increasing in number, the results of the present study may be of interest.

Linezolid Adsorption on Filters during Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: An In Vitro Study

Background: Renal replacement therapy (RRT), widely used in the treatment of renal injury during sepsis, aims to eliminate the toxins and proinflammatory cytokines involved in the pathomechanism underlying septic shock. Dialysis filters are characterized by a high adsorption potential for cytokines in RRT in the case of septic renal injury. For the treatment of sepsis with antibiotics, it is of key importance to achieve the desired values of PK/PD indices. Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) may affect antimicrobial clearance, increasing their elimination in some cases. Methods: The aim of this study was to determine the degree of adsorption for linezolid on three different types of filters used in CRRT. In our in vitro study, a continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH) was conducted using three types of filters: polysulfone (PS), polyethyleneimine-treated polyacrylonitrile (PAN PEI), and non-PEI-treated polyacrylonitrile (PAN). Each type of filter was used in three CVVH cycles, involving the use of 600 mg of linezolid dissolved in 700 mL of bovine blood or in 700 mL of 0.9% NaCl. In each case, the total volume of the obtained solution was 1000 mL. Blood samples were collected at particular time points to measure their drug concentration. The differences in mean drug/NaCl adsorption and drug/blood adsorption were determined using a one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons via Tukey's post hoc test; a p-value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results: A significant adsorption of linezolid was found for PAN PEI filters, both in samples obtained from bovine blood and 0.9% NaCl solutions, at the endpoint. In PAN PEI samples, the concentration of linezolid in 0.9% NaCl solutions decreased from 594.74 μg/mL to 310.66 μg/mL after 120 min (the difference was established at 52%). In blood samples, the initial concentration was 495.18 μg/mL, which then decreased to 359.84 μg/mL (73% of the beginning value). No significant adsorption was demonstrated on PAN or PS filters. Conclusion: There is a need for in vivo research to confirm the effect of filter type on linezolid concentration in patients undergoing CRRT.

Genetic Testing Technology Assisting in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Multiple Suppurative Arthritis and Extensive Migratory Skin and Soft Tissue Infections Caused by Disseminated Staphylococcus aureus Disease: A Case Report and Review

Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) infection is readily disseminated, yet the multiple septic arthritis and extensive migratory skin and soft tissue infections it causes are uncommon and challenging to treat. The infection can be life-threatening, with a mortality rate of 15-31%. Early, targeted antibiotic therapy is critical to improve prognosis. However, routine cultures are time-consuming and have low positivity rates, which may lead to errors in antibiotic regimen selection, depriving patients of optimal treatment. Genetic testing technologies, such as macrogenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) and digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR), are now emerging as powerful tools for early pathogen diagnosis as well as pathogen diagnosis of target detectors with low microbial loads. In this study, we report a 53-year-old man who was admitted to the ICU for treatment of septic shock. The causative agent was targeted earlier as S. aureus by mNGS, and the shock was corrected more quickly with targeted antibiotic medication. However, he later developed multiple septic arthritis and an extensive migratory skin soft tissue infection with persistent fever, and at one point a gram-negative bacterial infection was suspected, and the antibiotic regimen was incorrectly changed. Blood dPCR suggested that the causative organism was still methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA), with no drug resistance gene detected, and the anti-infective regimen was readjusted, and the patient eventually recovered and was discharged from the hospital. We present this rare case and review related studies to validate the superiority of genetic testing technology in pathogen diagnosis, which deserves further application.

Population pharmacokinetics and dosage optimization of linezolid in Chinese older patients

PURPOSE

To assess the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of linezolid in a retrospective cohort of hospitalized Chinese older patients.

METHODS

Patients > 60 years of age, who received intravenous linezolid (600 mg), were included. A population pharmacokinetics (PPK) model was established using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. The predictive performance of the final model was assessed using goodness-of-fit plots, bootstrap analyses, and visual predictive checks. Monte Carlo simulations were used to evaluate the achievement of a pharmacodynamics target for the area under the serum concentration-time curve/minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC0-24/MIC).

RESULTS

A total of 210 samples were collected from 120 patients. A one-compartment PPK model with linear elimination best predicted the linezolid plasma concentrations. Linezolid clearance (CL) was 4.22 L h-1 and volume of distribution (Vd) was 45.80 L; serum uric acid (SUA) was a significant covariate of CL.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study indicated that the standard dose was associated with a risk of overexposure in older patients, particularly those with high SUA values; these patients would benefit from a lower dose (300 mg every 12 h).

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of tuberculosis time to positivity and colony-forming unit to assess the response to dose-ranging linezolid

According to the World Health Organization, the number of tuberculosis (TB) infections and the drug-resistant burden worldwide increased by 4.5% and 3.0%, respectively, between 2020 and 2021. Disease severity and complexity drive the interest for undertaking new clinical trials to provide efficient treatment to limit spread and drug resistance. TB Alliance conducted a phase 2 study in 106 patients to guide linezolid (LZD) dose selection using early bactericidal activity over 14 days of treatment. LZD is highly efficient for drug-resistant TB treatment, but treatment monitoring is required since serious adverse events can occur. The objective of this study was to develop a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) model to analyze the dose-response relationship between linezolid exposure and efficacy biomarkers. Using time to positivity (TTP) and colony-forming unit (CFU) count data, we developed a PKPD model in six dosing regimens, differing on LZD dosing intensity. A one-compartment model with five transit absorption compartments and non-linear auto-inhibition elimination described best LZD pharmacokinetic characteristics. TTP and CFU logarithmic scaled [log(CFU)] showed a bactericidal activity of LZD against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. TTP was defined by a model with two significant covariates: the presence of uni- and bilateral cavities decreased baseline TTP value by 24%, and an increase on every 500 mg/L/h of cumulative area under the curve increased the rate at which TTP and CFU change from baseline by 20% and 11%, respectively.

CLINICAL TRIALS

This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT02279875.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of linezolid and exploring optimal regimens and a toxicity-related nomogram in elderly patients: a multicentre, prospective, non-interventional study

BACKGROUND

The concentrations of linezolid, its optimal regimen and the associated side effects in elderly patients remain unclear.

METHODS

In this multicentre, prospective study, elderly patients receiving linezolid at four tertiary hospitals in Beijing between May 2021 and December 2022 were included. Linezolid concentrations and haematological toxicity were monitored dynamically. Risk factors for linezolid overexposure and moderate-to-severe linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia (M/S LIT) were analysed, and a predictive model of M/S LIT was developed.

RESULTS

A total of 860 linezolid concentrations were measured in 313 patients. The median trough concentrations of linezolid were 24.4 (15.3, 35.8) mg/L at 36-72 h and 26.1 (17.0, 38.1) mg/L at 5-10 days (P = 0.132). Severe linezolid exposure was independently associated with age, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and the worst SOFA score (SOFA1), and we further recommended dose regimens for elderly patients based on these findings. The incidences of linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia(LIT) and M/S LIT were 73.5% and 47.6%, respectively. M/S LIT was independently correlated with treatment duration, average trough concentration (TDMa), baseline platelet count, eGFR and baseline SOFA score (SOFA0). The developed nomogram predicted M/S LIT with an area under the curve of 0.767 (95% CI 0.715-0.820), a sensitivity of 71.1% and a specificity of 73.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

Linezolid trough concentrations increased dramatically in the elderly, by about 10 mg/L in patients aged 65-80 years, followed by a further increase of 10 mg/L for every 10 years of age. Therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended in elderly patients receiving linezolid. The developed nomogram may predict M/S LIT and guide dosage adjustments of linezolid. Clinical trial registration number: ChiCTR2100045707.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Linezolid in Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis Patients: Clinical Factors and Hematological Toxicities

Purpose

Previous studies have indicated that the development of severe adverse events is associated with linezolid peak concentration (Cmax), but the factors affecting linezolid Cmax and evidences on therapeutic drug monitoring to anticipate toxicity in drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) patients have not been clarified clearly. This study aimed to explore the factors influencing linezolid Cmax and investigate the association between linezolid concentration and hematological toxicity.

Patients and Methods

This study included patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis treated with linezolid from January 2022 to September 2023. We analyzed the factors affecting linezolid Cmax using chi-squared and binary logistic regression. The diagnostic utility of linezolid Cmax in predicting hematological toxicity was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

Results

A total of 76 patients were enrolled in the study. 63.20% met the standard rates for linezolid Cmax. Age (P=0.036), weight (P=0.0016), and creatinine clearance (P=0.0223) significantly correlated with the Cmax. Hematological toxicity was observed in 46.05% (35/76) of patients, characterized by thrombocytopenia (31.58%, 24/76), anemia (6.58%, 5/76), and leukopenia (21.05%, 16/76). ROC curve analysis confirmed the predictive value of linezolid Cmax for thrombocytopenia with an area under curve of 0.728.

Conclusion

Suboptimal linezolid Cmax was prevalent among patients with DR-TB, with age, weight, and renal function emerging as influential factors. Elevated linezolid Cmax increases the risk of thrombocytopenia. Meticulous monitoring of linezolid Cmax is imperative during anti-DR-TB therapy to tailor treatment and mitigate hematological toxicity.

Lincosamide monotherapy treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia in tropical Australia: a case series

Existing recommended first-line antibiotic agents for MRSA pneumonia have several shortcomings. We reviewed 29 cases of community- and hospital-acquired MRSA pneumonia managed at our hospital. Lincosamide monotherapy was administered to 21/29 (72%) and was the predominant antibiotic regimen (> 50% course duration) in 19/29 (66%). Patients receiving lincosamide-predominant monotherapy were no more likely to die or require intensive care unit admission than patients receiving vancomycin-predominant monotherapy (5/19 (26%) versus 4/7 (57%), p = 0.19); 5/7 (71%) patients admitted to ICU and 4/5 (80%) bacteraemic patients received lincosamide-predominant monotherapy. MRSA pneumonia can be safely treated with lincosamide monotherapy if the isolate is susceptible.

Updated antimicrobial dosing recommendations for obese patients

The prevalence of obesity has increased considerably in the last few decades. Pathophysiological changes in obese patients lead to pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) alterations that can condition the correct exposure to antimicrobials if standard dosages are used. Inadequate dosing in obese patients can lead to toxicity or therapeutic failure. In recent years, additional antimicrobial PK/PD data, extended infusion strategies, and studies in critically ill patients have made it possible to obtain data to provide a better dosage in obese patients. Despite this, it is usually difficult to find information on drug dosing in this population, which is sometimes contradictory. This is a comprehensive review of the dosing of different types of antimicrobials (antibiotics, antifungals, antivirals, and antituberculosis drugs) in obese patients, where the literature on PK and possible dosing strategies in obese adults was critically assessed.

Management of M. abscessus subsp. abscessus early-onset prosthetic joint infection: Case report and literature review

Nontuberculous mycobacteria are a rare but still emerging cause of difficult-to-treat prosthetic joint infection. To our knowledge only 17 cases of M. abscessus complex prosthetic joint infection are reported in literature, of which only 1 is by M. abscessus subps. abscessus. No guidelines are available for this clinical scenario. We describe a 68-years-old female patient with an early-onset M. abscessus subsp. abscessus prosthetic joint infection, successfully treated with a tailored medical-surgical strategy, and present an overview of cases currently available in the literature to assist physicians in the management of these uncommon infections.

Towards precision medicine of long-acting aripiprazole through population pharmacokinetic modelling

Population pharmacokinetic (popPK) models constitute a valuable tool for characterizing the pharmacokinetic properties of once-monthly long-acting injectable aripiprazole (LAI aripiprazole) and quantifying the sources of variability in drug exposure. Our aim is to develop a popPK model of both aripiprazole and its metabolite dehydro-aripiprazole in patients treated with LAI aripiprazole, and to personalize the dosing regimen of aripiprazole across different sub-groups of patients. This is a prospective study investigating the pharmacokinetics of LAI aripiprazole. A total of 93 patients were included, 21 for model development and 71 for external model evaluation. A one-compartment model with linear absorption and elimination adequately described both aripiprazole and dehydro-aripiprazole concentrations. The weight of the patients has been shown to be the factor that most influences the absorption. However, the metabolizing phenotype for CYP2D6 and the concomitant treatment with strong inhibitors of this cytochrome have been shown to be the covariates that most influence total drug exposure. This is the first popPK model developed for LAI aripiprazole that includes aripiprazole and its main active metabolite, dehydroaripiprazole. It provides a personalized dosage recommendation that maximizes the probability of achieving optimal therapeutic concentrations and minimizes the difficulties associated with trial-and-error therapeutic strategies carried out in clinical practice.

Adverse drug events associated with linezolid administration: a real-world pharmacovigilance study from 2004 to 2023 using the FAERS database

Introduction: Linezolid is an oxazolidinone antibiotic that is active against drug-resistant Gram-positive bacteria and multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Real-world studies on the safety of linezolid in large populations are lacking. This study aimed to determine the adverse events associated with linezolid in real-world settings by analyzing data from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Methods: We retrospectively extracted reports on adverse drug events (ADEs) from the FAERS database from the first quarter of 2004 to that of 2023. By using disproportionality analysis including reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), along with the multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS), we evaluated whether there was a significant association between linezolid and ADE. The time to onset of ADE was further analyzed in the general population and within each age, weight, reporting population, and weight subgroups. Results: A total of 11,176 reports of linezolid as the "primary suspected" drug and 263 significant adverse events of linezolid were identified, including some common adverse events such as thrombocytopenia (n = 1,139, ROR 21.98), anaemia (n = 704, ROR 7.39), and unexpected signals that were not listed on the drug label such as rhabdomyolysis (n = 90, ROR 4.33), and electrocardiogram QT prolonged (n = 73, ROR 4.07). Linezolid-induced adverse reactions involved 27 System Organ Class (SOC). Gender differences existed in ADE signals related to linezolid. The median onset time of all ADEs was 6 days, and most ADEs (n = 3,778) occurred within the first month of linezolid use but some may continue to occur even after a year of treatment (n = 46). Conclusion: This study reports the time to onset of adverse effects in detail at the levels of SOC and specific preferred term (PT). The results of our study provide valuable insights for optimizing the use of linezolid and reducing potential side effects, expected to facilitate the safe use of linezolid in clinical settings.

Population Pharmacokinetic Model of Linezolid and Probability of Target Attainment in Patients with COVID-19-Associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome on Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation-A Step toward Correct Dosing

During veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vv ECMO) therapy, antimicrobial drugs are frequently used, and appropriate dosing is challenging due to there being limited data to support the dosage. Linezolid is effective against multidrug-resistant Gram-positive pathogens frequently isolated in ECMO patients. In total, 53 steady-state linezolid levels were obtained following 600 mg intravenous (IV) injections every 8 h, and these were used to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model in patients with COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (CARDS) on vv ECMO. The data were analyzed using a nonlinear mixed-effects modelling approach. Monte Carlo simulation generated 5000 patients' individual PK parameters and corresponding concentration-time profiles using the PopPK model, following the administration of 600 mg/8 h (a higher-than-standard dosing) and 600 mg/12 h (standard). The probabilities of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment (PTA) and the cumulative fraction of responses (CFR) for three pathogens were calculated and compared between the two dosing scenarios. Linezolid 600 mg/8 h was predicted to achieve greater than or equal to 85%Tf>MIC in at least 90% of the patients with CARDS on vv ECMO compared to only approximately two thirds of the patients after dosing every 12 h at a minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 2 mg/L. In addition, for the same MIC, fAUC24/MIC ≥ 80 was achieved in almost three times the number of patients following an 8-h versus a 12-h interval. PopPK simulation predicted that a significantly higher proportion of the patients with CARDS on vv ECMO would achieve the PK/PD targets following the 8-h dosing interval compared to standard linezolid dosing. Nevertheless, the safety concern, in particular, for thrombocytopenia, with higher-than-standard linezolid dosage is reasonable, and consequently, monitoring is essential.

Antibiotics in anesthesia and critical care

Sepsis is life-threatening organ dysfunction due to a dysregulated host response to an underlying acute infection. Sepsis is a major worldwide healthcare problem. An annual estimated 48.9 million incident cases of sepsis is reported, with 11 million (20%) sepsis-related deaths. Administration of appropriate antimicrobials is one of the most effective therapeutic interventions to reduce mortality. The severity of illness informs the urgency of antimicrobial administration. Nevertheless, even used properly, they cause adverse effects and contribute to the development of antibiotic resistance. Both inadequate and unnecessarily broad empiric antibiotics are associated with higher mortality and also select for antibiotic-resistant germs. In this narrative review, we will first discuss important factors and potential confounders which may influence the occurrence of surgical site infection (SSI) and which should be considered in the provision of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP). Then, we will summarize recent advances and perspectives to optimize antibiotic therapy in the intensive care unit (ICU). Finally, the major role of the microbiota and the impact of antimicrobials on it will be discussed. While expert recommendations help guide daily practice in the operating theatre and ICU, a thorough knowledge of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) rules is critical to optimize the management of complex patients and minimize the emergence of multidrug-resistant organisms.

Safety and effectiveness of fifth generation cephalosporins for the treatment of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections: a narrative review exploring past, present, and future

INTRODUCTION

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infection (BSI) is a major issue in healthcare, since it is often associated with endocarditis or deep site foci. Relevant morbidity and mortality associated with MRSA-BSIs forced the development of new antibiotic strategies; in particular, this review will focus the attention on fifth-generation cephalosporins (ceftaroline/ceftobiprole), that are the only ß-lactams active against MRSA.

AREAS COVERED

The review discusses the available randomized controlled trials and real-world observational studies conducted on safety and effectiveness of ceftaroline/ceftobiprole for the treatment of MRSA-BSIs. Finally, a proposal of MRSA-BSI treatment flowchart, based on fifth-generation cephalosporins, is described.

EXPERT OPINION

The use of anti-MRSA cephalosporins is an acceptable choice either in monotherapy or combination therapy for the treatment of MRSA-BSIs due to their relevant effectiveness and safety. Particularly, their use may be advisable in combination therapy in case of severe infections (including endocarditis or persistent bacteriemia) or in monotherapy in subjects at higher risk of drugs-induced toxicity with older regimens. On the contrary, caution should be taken in case of suspected/ascertained central nervous system infections due to inconsistent data regarding penetration of these drugs in cerebrospinal fluid and brain tissues.

Long-Term Intake of Linezolid Elevates Drug Exposure and Reduces Drug Clearance and Elimination in Adults With Drug-Resistant Pulmonary Tuberculosis

PURPOSE

Pharmacokinetic (PK) studies are critical for dose optimization, and there is a paucity of linezolid (LZD) PK data for prolonged use in drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB). Therefore, the authors evaluated the pharmacokinetics of LZD at two-time intervals in DR-TB during long-term use.

METHODS

PK evaluation of LZD was performed at the end of the 8th and 16th weeks of treatment in a randomly selected subset of adult pre-extensively drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis patients (n = 18) from a multicentric interventional study (Building Evidence to Advance Treatment of TB/BEAT study; CTRI/2019/01/017310), wherein a daily dose of 600 mg LZD was used for 24 weeks. Plasma LZD levels were measured using a validated high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) method.

RESULTS

The LZD median plasma C max was comparable between the 8th and 16th weeks [18.3 mg/L, interquartile range (IQR: 15.5-20.8 and 18.8 mg/L, IQR: 16.0-22.7, respectively)]. However, the trough concentration increased significantly in the 16th week (3.16 mg/L, IQR: 2.30-4.76), compared with the 8th week (1.98 mg/L, IQR: 0.93-2.75). Furthermore, compared with the 8th week, in the 16th week, there was a significant increase in drug exposure (AUC 0-24 = 184.2 mg*h/L, IQR: 156.4-215.8 versus 233.2 mg*h/L, IQR: 187.9-277.2), which corroborated with a longer elimination half-life (6.94 hours, IQR: 5.55-7.99 versus 8.47 hours, IQR:7.36-11.35) and decreased clearance (2.91 L/h, IQR: 2.45-3.33 versus 2.19 L/h, IQR: 1.49-2.78).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term daily intake of 600 mg LZD resulted in a significant elevation in trough concentration (>2.0 mg/L) in 83% of the study participants. Furthermore, increased LZD drug exposure may be partly because of decreased clearance and elimination. Overall, the PK data underscore the need for dose adjustment when LZDs are intended for long-term treatment.

Acute-on-chronic liver failure alters linezolid pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients with continuous hemodialysis: an observational study

BACKGROUND

In acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF), adequate antibiotic dosing is challenging due to changes of drug distribution and elimination. We studied the pharmacokinetics of linezolid in critically ill patients with ACLF during continuous renal replacement therapy compared to patients without concomitant liver failure (NLF).

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, patients received linezolid 600 mg bid. Linezolid serum samples were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography. Population pharmacokinetic modelling was performed followed by Monte-Carlo simulations of 150 mg bid, 300 mg bid, 450 mg bid, 600 mg bid, and 900 mg bid to assess trough concentration target attainment of 2-7 mg/L.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were included in this study with nine suffering from ACLF. Linezolid body clearance was lower in the ACLF group with mean (standard deviation) 1.54 (0.52) L/h versus 6.26 (2.43) L/h for NLF, P < 0.001. A trough concentration of 2-7 mg/L was reached with the standard dose of 600 mg bid in the NLF group in 47%, with 42% being underexposed and 11% overexposed versus 20% in the ACLF group with 77% overexposed and 3% underexposed. The highest probability of target exposure was attained with 600 mg bid in the NLF group and 150 mg bid in the ACLF group with 53%.

CONCLUSION

Linezolid body clearance in ACLF was markedly lower than in NLF. Given the overall high variability, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) with dose adjustments seems required to optimize target attainment. Until TDM results are available, a dose reduction may be considered in ACLF patients to prevent overexposure.

Bayesian prediction-based individualized dosing of anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus treatment: Recent advancements and prospects in therapeutic drug monitoring

As one of the efficient techniques for TDM, the population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model approach for dose individualization has been developed due to the rapidly growing innovative progress in computer technology and has recently been considered as a part of model-informed precision dosing (MIPD). Initial dose individualization and measurement followed by maximum a posteriori (MAP)-Bayesian prediction using a popPK model are the most classical and widely used approach among a class of MIPD strategies. MAP-Bayesian prediction offers the possibility of dose optimization based on measurement even before reaching a pharmacokinetically steady state, such as in an emergency, especially for infectious diseases requiring urgent antimicrobial treatment. As the pharmacokinetic processes in critically ill patients are affected and highly variable due to pathophysiological disturbances, the advantages offered by the popPK model approach make it highly recommended and required for effective and appropriate antimicrobial treatment. In this review, we focus on novel insights and beneficial aspects of the popPK model approach, especially in the treatment of infectious diseases with anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus agents represented by vancomycin, and discuss the recent advancements and prospects in TDM practice.

Linezolid Pharmacokinetics and Its Association with Adverse Drug Reactions in Patients with Drug-Resistant Pulmonary Tuberculosis

We evaluated the relationship between the pharmacokinetic parameters of linezolid (LZD) and development of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in patients with pulmonary drug-resistant tuberculosis. A prospective cohort of adults with pulmonary multidrug-resistant tuberculosis with additional resistance to fluoroquinolone (MDR-TB_FQ+) received treatment with bedaquiline, delamanid, clofazimine, and LZD. Blood samples were collected during weeks 8 and 16 at eight time points over 24 h. The pharmacokinetic parameters of LZD were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography and associated with ADRs. Of the 165 MDR-TB_FQ+ patients on treatment, 78 patients developed LZD-associated anemia and 69 developed peripheral neuropathy. Twenty-three patients underwent intense pharmacokinetic testing. Plasma median trough concentration was 2.08 µg/mL and 3.41 µg/mL, (normal <2 µg/mL) and AUC_0-24 was 184.5 µg/h/mL and 240.5 µg/h/mL at weeks 8 and 16, respectively, showing a linear relationship between duration of intake and plasma levels. Nineteen patients showed LZD-associated ADRs-nine at week 8, twelve at week 16, and two at both weeks 8 and 16. Thirteen of the nineteen had high plasma trough and peak concentrations of LZD. A strong association between LZD-associated ADRs and plasma LZD levels was noted. Trough concentration alone or combinations of trough with peak levels are potential targets for therapeutic drug monitoring.

Developmental Pharmacokinetics of Antibiotics Used in Neonatal ICU: Focus on Preterm Infants

Neonatal Infections are among the most common reasons for admission to the intensive care unit. Neonatal sepsis (NS) significantly contributes to mortality rates. Empiric antibiotic therapy of NS recommended by current international guidelines includes benzylpenicillin, ampicillin/amoxicillin, and aminoglycosides (gentamicin). The rise of antibacterial resistance precipitates the growth of the use of antibiotics of the Watch (second, third, and fourth generations of cephalosporines, carbapenems, macrolides, glycopeptides, rifamycins, fluoroquinolones) and Reserve groups (fifth generation of cephalosporines, oxazolidinones, lipoglycopeptides, fosfomycin), which are associated with a less clinical experience and higher risks of toxic reactions. A proper dosing regimen is essential for effective and safe antibiotic therapy, but its choice in neonates is complicated with high variability in the maturation of organ systems affecting drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion. Changes in antibiotic pharmacokinetic parameters result in altered efficacy and safety. Population pharmacokinetics can help to prognosis outcomes of antibiotic therapy, but it should be considered that the neonatal population is heterogeneous, and this heterogeneity is mainly determined by gestational and postnatal age. Preterm neonates are common in clinical practice, and due to the different physiology compared to the full terms, constitute a specific neonatal subpopulation. The objective of this review is to summarize the evidence about the developmental changes (specific for preterm and full-term infants, separately) of pharmacokinetic parameters of antibiotics used in neonatal intensive care units.

Hematological toxicities associated with linezolid therapy in adults: key findings and clinical considerations

INTRODUCTION

Linezolid can cause serious adverse effects including thrombocytopenia and anemia. Here, we focus specifically on linezolid-related hematological toxicity in adult patients requiring prolonged drug treatment.

AREAS COVERED

We review the available evidence on the likelihood of hematological toxicity in adult patients treated with linezolid, with a focus on the main risk factors and strategies to prevent this adverse event. A MEDLINE PubMed search for articles published from January 2000 to May 2022 was completed matching the terms linezolid, hematology, hematological toxicity, anemia, and thrombocytopenia. Moreover, additional studies were identified from the reference lists of retrieved articles.

EXPERT OPINION

Thrombocytopenia is the major concern with administration of linezolid for Gram-positive infections, whereas anemia is more common in patients with tuberculosis. The important clinical risk factors for the development of linezolid-related thrombocytopenia are aging, renal dysfunction, low baseline platelet count, duration of treatment, and linezolid plasma trough concentrations >8 mg/L. Patients receiving linezolid for extended periods of time or patient populations with increased risk of altered drug pharmacokinetics would benefit from therapeutic drug monitoring or from the availability of toxico-dynamic predictive models to optimize linezolid dosing.

Optimization of Therapy and the Risk of Probiotic Use during Antibiotherapy in Septic Critically Ill Patients: A Narrative Review

Optimizing the entire therapeutic regimen in septic critically ill patients should be based not only on improving antibiotic use but also on optimizing the entire therapeutic regimen by considering possible drug-drug or drug-nutrient interactions. The aim of this narrative review is to provide a comprehensive overview on recent advances to optimize the therapeutic regimen in septic critically ill patients based on a pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic approach. Studies on recent advances on TDM-guided drug therapy optimization based on PK and/or PD results were included. Studies on patients <18 years old or with classical TDM-guided therapy were excluded. New approaches in TDM-guided therapy in septic critically ill patients based on PK and/or PD parameters are presented for cefiderocol, carbapenems, combinations beta-lactams/beta-lactamase inhibitors (piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam), plazomicin, oxazolidinones and polymyxins. Increased midazolam toxicity in combination with fluconazole, nephrotoxic synergism between furosemide and aminoglycosides, life-threatening hypoglycemia after fluoroquinolone and insulin, prolonged muscle weakness and/or paralysis after neuromuscular blocking agents and high-dose corticosteroids combinations are of interest in critically ill patients. In the real-world practice, the use of probiotics with antibiotics is common; even data about the risk and benefits of probiotics are currently spares and inconclusive. According to current legislation, probiotic use does not require safety monitoring, but there are reports of endocarditis, meningitis, peritonitis, or pneumonia associated with probiotics in critically ill patients. In addition, probiotics are associated with risk of the spread of antimicrobial resistance. The TDM-guided method ensures a true optimization of antibiotic therapy, and particular efforts should be applied globally. In addition, multidrug and drug-nutrient interactions in critically ill patients may increase the likelihood of adverse events and risk of death; therefore, the PK and PD particularities of the critically ill patient require a multidisciplinary approach in which knowledge of clinical pharmacology is essential.

Identifying and Targeting Prediction of the PI3K-AKT Signaling Pathway in Drug-Induced Thrombocytopenia in Infected Patients Receiving Linezolid Therapy: A Network Pharmacology-Based Analysis

The pharmacological mechanisms underlying the adverse effects of linezolid on thrombocytopenia have not been conclusively determined. This network pharmacology study aimed at investigating the potential pharmacological mechanisms of linezolid-induced adverse reactions in thrombocytopenia. In this study, target genes for linezolid and thrombocytopenia were compared and analyzed. Overlapping thrombocytopenia-associated targets and predicted targets of linezolid were imported to establish protein-protein interaction networks. Gene Ontology and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genome pathway enrichment analyses were performed to determine the enriched biological terms and pathways. The mechanisms involved in linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia were established to be associated with various biological processes, including T cell activation, peptidyl serine modification, and peptidyl serine phosphorylation. The top five relevant protein targets were obtained, including ALB, AKT1, EGFR, IL6, and MTOR. Enrichment analysis showed that the targets of linezolid were positively correlated with T cell activation responses. The mechanism of action of linezolid was positively correlated with the PI3K-AKT signaling pathway and negatively correlated with the Ras signaling pathway. We identified the important protein targets and signaling pathways involved in linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia in anti-infection therapy, providing new information for subsequent studies on the pathogenesis of drug-induced thrombocytopenia and potential therapeutic strategies for rational use of linezolid in clinical settings.