Economic Evaluation of Stiripentol for Dravet Syndrome: A Cost-Utility Analysis

Cost-effectiveness of clobazam as an adjunctive treatment for refractory epilepsy in China

BACKGROUND

Clobazam (CLB) is an effective, safe and well-tolerated adjunctive treatment for refractory epilepsy. However, the cost-effectiveness of CLB in China remains unclear.

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of CLB as an adjunctive therapy for patients with refractory epilepsy in China.

METHOD

A Markov model was established to simulate the lifetime epilepsy process in patients. The epilepsy remission rate, health state utility and mortality data were derived from clinical trials and the literature. The costs were collected from the health care system in the hospital. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), which was calculated by comparing CLB as an add-on therapy with conventional therapy and was assessed in the context of the Chinese health system. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate parameter uncertainty, and several scenario analyses were also conducted.

RESULTS

Compared with maintaining conventional therapy, adding CLB as an adjuvant therapy increased the cost of Chinese Yuan (CNY) 1770.17 over a lifetime, with an incremental quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) value of 1.02, resulting in an ICER of CNY 1737.10 per QALY gained. The daily dose of CLB had the strongest effect on the ICER. The probabilistic sensitivity analyses revealed that the probability of CLB being cost-effective was 77.35% at a willingness to pay (WTP) of CNY 85698/QALY.

CONCLUSION

CLB is a cost-effective add-on therapy for refractory epilepsy in the Chinese population.

A comprehensive review of evolving treatment strategies for Dravet syndrome: Insights from randomized trials, meta-analyses, real-world evidence, and emerging therapeutic approaches

Dravet syndrome (DS) is a severe genetic developmental and epileptic encephalopathy, primarily caused by SCN1A gene mutations. Historically, treatments like clobazam and valproate have been used without evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). However, the therapeutic landscape of DS has evolved with multiple RCTs demonstrating the efficacy and safety of three antiseizure medications (ASMs): stiripentol, cannabidiol (CBD), and fenfluramine. In the absence of direct comparisons between these therapies, several network meta-analyses have been conducted to compare the ASMs, while expert consensus has independently been developed to formulate treatment guidelines. While these three ASMs show promise in reducing seizures, increasing awareness of non-seizure outcomes-such as cognitive development and quality of life-has shifted the focus of evaluation. Some recent real-world studies of these ASMs have reported improvements in these non-seizure outcomes, alongside sustained efficacy and safety. However, natural history studies continue to underscore persistent deficits in these areas and highlight suboptimal long-term seizure control despite the use of these therapies. This review addresses these gaps by first discussing network meta-analyses and treatment guidelines, along with the practical limitations of these approaches. It then examines the long-term efficacy, safety, non-seizure effects, and cost-effectiveness from real-world studies of these ASMs. Finally, emerging research on novel therapeutic approaches, including genetic and serotonergic modulation, is explored. By evaluating these developments, this review aims to guide clinical decision-making and propose future directions for optimizing DS care.

Determining the Relationship Between Seizure-Free Days and Other Predictors of Quality of Life in Patients with Dravet Syndrome and Their Carers from FFA Registration Studies

INTRODUCTION

Dravet syndrome (DS) is a rare, lifelong epileptic encephalopathy characterised by frequent and severe seizures associated with premature mortality. Typically diagnosed in infancy, patients also experience progressive behavioural, motor-function and cognitive decline. Twenty percent of patients do not reach adulthood. Quality of life (QoL) is impaired for both patients and their carers. Reducing convulsive seizure frequency, increasing convulsive seizure-free days (SFDs) and improving patient/carer QoL are primary treatment goals in DS. This study explored the relationship between SFDs and patients' and carers' QoL to inform a cost-utility analysis of fenfluramine (FFA).

METHODS

In FFA registration studies, patients (or their carer proxies) completed the Paediatric QoL inventory (PedsQL). These data were mapped to EuroQol-5 Dimensions Youth version (EQ-5D-Y) to provide patient utilities. Carer utilities were collected using EQ-5D-5L and mapped to EQ-5D-3L to align patient and carer QoL on the same scale. Linear mixed-effects and panel regression models were tested and Hausman tests identified the most appropriate approach for each group. On this basis, a linear mixed-effects regression model was used to examine the relationships between patient EQ-5D-Y and clinically relevant variables (age, frequency of SFDs per 28 days, motor impairments and treatment dose). A linear panel regression model examined the relationship between SFDs and carer QoL.

RESULTS

After adjustment for age and underlying comorbidities, the patient regression model showed that SFDs per 28 days was a significant predictor of QoL. Each additional patient-SFD increased utility by 0.005 (p < 0.001). The carer linear panel model also showed that increasing SFDs per 28 days was a significant predictor of improved QoL. Each additional SFD increased carer utility by 0.014 (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This regression framework highlights that SFDs are significantly correlated with both patients' and carers' QoL. Treatment with effective antiseizure medications that increase SFDs directly improves QoL for patients and their carers.

Emotional experiences of family caregivers of children with Dravet syndrome

BACKGROUND

Since the psychosocial implications of Dravet syndrome (DS) are much more serious and far-reaching than in other types of epilepsy, caring for a DS child seriously affects the entire family. This study describes the emotional experiences of family caregivers of DS children and evaluates the way caregiving affects their perceived quality of life.

METHODS

An anonymous, self-administered online questionnaire was sent to family caregivers of DS children through the online patient advocacy organization the Association for People with Severe Refractory Epilepsy DRAVET.PL. It focussed on the psychosocial impact of caregiving for DS children, the perceived burden of caregiving, caregivers' emotional experiences and feelings related to caregiving, and the impact of DS on the perceived quality of life.

RESULTS

Caregivers stressed that caring for a DS child is associated with a significant psychosocial and emotional burden that affects the entire family. Although most caregivers reported that it was the child's health problems and behavioral and psychological disorders that were the most challenging aspects of caregiving, they were also burdened by the lack of emotional support. As caregivers were profoundly engaged in caregiving, they experienced a variety of distressing emotions, including feelings of helplessness, anxiety and fear, anticipated grief, depression, and impulsivity. Many caregivers also reported that their children's disease disrupted their relationships with their spouses, family, and healthy children. As caregivers reported experiencing role overload, physical fatigue, and mental exhaustion, they stressed the extent to which caregiving for DS children impaired their quality of life, their social and professional life, and was a source of financial burden.

CONCLUSIONS

As this study identified specific burden domains affecting DS caregivers' well-being family carers often need special attention, support, and help. To alleviate the humanistic burden of DS carers a bio-psychosocial approach focusing on physical, mental, and psychosocial interventions should include both DS children and their caregivers.

Rare Neurological Diseases: an Overreview of Pathophysiology, Epidemiology, Clinical Features and Pharmacoeconomic Considerations in the Treating

Rare diseases (RD) are serious chronic diseases affecting small number of people compared to the general population. There are between 6000 and 8000 RDs, which affect about 400 million people worldwide. Drugs used for causal treatment of RDs are called orphan drugs. RDs bear great clinical and economic burden for patients, their families, healthcare systems and society overall. There are at least two reasons for the high cost of treatment of RDs. First, there is no causal therapy for majority of RDs, so exacerbations, complications, and hospitalizations in those patients are common. The second reason is high price of available orphan drugs, which are not cost-effective when traditional pharmacoeconomic evaluation is employed. The pharmacoeconomic aspect of the treatment of RDs is especially important in the field of neurology, since at least one fifth of all RDs is composed of neurological conditions. The aim of this paper was to provide a concise overview of the pathophysiological, epidemiological and clinical characteristics of some of the most important and common rare neurological diseases, with special reference to their impact on society and economy.

Patient and Caregiver Health State Utilities in Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome and Dravet Syndrome

PURPOSE

Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) and Dravet syndrome (DS) are rare, treatment-resistant forms of epilepsy characterized by childhood onset of seizures. Cost-effectiveness analysis for new antiseizure medications typically requires health state utilities (HSUs) that reflect the patient and caregiver burden of the relevant conditions. This study aimed to estimate HSUs for LGS and DS. Focus was placed on valuing the impact of seizure frequency and seizure-free days on health-related quality of life (HRQL) for patients and caregivers.

METHODS

Health state vignettes that described the experience of living with and caring for a child with LGS or DS were developed based on a targeted literature review and feedback from interviews with LGS and DS clinical experts and DS caregivers. Vignettes varied by the number of seizures and seizure-free days per month. Twenty-four vignettes were developed that described patient HRQL (6 per condition) and caregiver HRQL (6 per condition) for LGS or DS. Vignettes were evaluated via interviews from the general population in the United Kingdom and Sweden using a visual analog scale and time trade-off (TTO) method. Participants were recruited by interviewers based in different regions of the United Kingdom and Sweden using convenience sampling.

FINDINGS

Two hundred interviews were conducted by video call from March to April 2020. One hundred participants evaluated each of the 6 patient and 6 caregiver vignettes for LGS; a different 100 participants evaluated each of the DS vignettes. The estimated utility values vary consistently according to seizure frequency and number of seizure-free days. Patient TTO utility values range from -0.186 (highest seizure frequency and fewest seizure-free days) to 0.754 (seizure-free state) for LGS and from 0.171 to 0.778 for DS. The caregiver TTO utility values range from 0.032 to 0.810 and 0.510 to 0.881 for LGS and DS, respectively. Fewer seizures and additional seizure-free days are associated with better patient and caregiver HRQL.

IMPLICATIONS

This study estimated utility values for patients with LGS or DS and their caregivers using visual analog scale and TTO valuation among a general public sample. These utility values can be used in cost-effectiveness assessments of new antiseizure medications. The findings indicate the importance of seizure-free days as well as seizure frequency in patient and caregiver HRQL, which may inform the design of future clinical trials.

The impact of seizure frequency on quality of life in patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome or Dravet syndrome

OBJECTIVES

Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) and Dravet syndrome (DS) are rare treatment-resistant epileptic encephalopathies with limited data describing the relationship between seizures and quality of life (QoL). The objective of this cross-sectional pilot study was to assess the impact on QoL of seizures and seizure-free days for the generation of utility values.

METHODS

Surveys were conducted in the UK and France, whereby patients and/or caregivers of patients with LGS, DS, or other epilepsies were asked to score health state vignettes for a hypothetical patient with LGS or DS. Respondents evaluated QoL for health states based on the number of seizures and seizure-free days per month, using a visual analog scale (VAS). Visual analog scale scores were converted to the 0-1 scale as a proxy estimate for utility values. Surveys were pilot tested and respondents were recruited from October 2018 to August 2019.

RESULTS

Patient respondents were mainly treatment-responsive (n = 43/55) whereas caregiver respondents mainly cared for patients with treatment-resistant epilepsy (n = 38/43). Most respondents and patients were aged ≥18 years. Results from LGS and DS surveys in the UK (n = 58) and France (n = 40) suggested that health states with fewer seizures and more seizure-free days had higher QoL scores for hypothetical patients. For DS, QoL scores for patient health states ranged from 0.20 (32 convulsive seizures and 4 seizure-free days/month, UK) to 0.92 (seizure-free, France). For LGS, scores ranged from 0.14 (130 drop seizures and 1 seizure-free day/month, France) to 0.83 (seizure-free, UK). In all surveys, seizure-free days had a greater impact on QoL than seizure frequency (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Fewer seizures and additional seizure-free days improved QoL in patients with LGS or DS; seizure-free days had the greatest impact on QoL.

Economic Evaluation of Cannabinoid Oil for Dravet Syndrome: A Cost-Utility Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Cannabinoid oils are being increasingly used to treat Dravet syndrome, yet the long-term costs and outcomes of this approach are unknown. Thus, we examined the cost effectiveness of cannabinoid oil as an adjunctive treatment (added to clobazam and valproate), compared with adjunctive stiripentol or with clobazam and valproate alone, for the treatment of Dravet syndrome in children.

METHODS

We performed a probabilistic cost-utility analysis from the perspective of the Canadian public health care system, comparing cannabinoid oil and stiripentol (both on a background of clobazam and valproate) with clobazam and valproate alone. Costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were estimated using a Markov model that followed a cohort of children aged from 5 to 18 years through model states related to seizure frequency. Model inputs were obtained from the literature. The cost effectiveness of adjunctive cannabinoid oil, adjunctive stiripentol, and clobazam/valproate alone was assessed through sequential analysis. The influence of perspective and other assumptions were explored in scenario analyses. All costs are expressed in 2019 Canadian dollars, and costs and QALYs were discounted at a rate of 1.5% per year.

RESULTS

The incremental cost per QALY gained with the use of adjunctive cannabinoid oil, from the health care system perspective, was $32,399 compared with clobazam and valproate. Stiripentol was dominated by cannabinoid oil, producing fewer QALYs at higher costs. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000, cannabinoid oil was the optimal treatment in 76% of replications. From a societal perspective, cannabinoid oil dominated stiripentol and clobazam/valproate. The interpretation of the results was insensitive to model and input assumptions.

CONCLUSION

Compared with clobazam/valproate, adjunctive cannabinoid oil may be a cost-effective treatment for Dravet syndrome, if a decision maker is willing to pay at least $32,399 for each QALY gained. The opportunity costs of continuing to fund stiripentol, but not cannabinoid oil, should be considered.

Decision Models for Assessing the Cost Effectiveness of Treatments for Pediatric Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations

BACKGROUND

Drug-resistant epilepsy affects about one-third of children with epilepsy and is associated with high costs to the healthcare system, yet the cost effectiveness of most treatments is unclear. Use of cannabis-based products for epilepsy is increasing, and the cost effectiveness of such strategies relative to conventional pharmacologic treatments must be considered.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this systematic review was to identify economic evaluations of cannabis-based treatments for pediatric drug-resistant epilepsy. We also sought to identify and appraise decision models that have been used in economic evaluations of pharmacologic treatments (i.e., antiepileptic drugs) in this population.

METHODS

Electronic searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library, as well as a targeted grey literature search, were undertaken (11 June 2018). Model-based full economic evaluations involving cannabis-based treatments or pharmacologic treatments for drug-resistant epilepsy in children were eligible for inclusion. Two independent reviewers selected studies for inclusion, and study quality was assessed by use of the Drummond and Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklists. Study findings, as well as model characteristics, are narratively summarized.

RESULTS

Nine economic evaluations involving children with drug-resistant epilepsy were identified; however, none involved cannabis-based treatments. All studies involved pharmacologic treatments compared with other pharmacologic treatments or non-pharmacologic treatments (i.e., ketogenic diet, epilepsy surgery, vagus nerve stimulation). Few studies have assessed the cost effectiveness of pharmacologic treatments in specific drug-resistant epilepsy syndromes, including Dravet and Lennox-Gastaut syndromes. Five included studies involved use of Markov models with a similar structure (i.e., health states based on seizure frequency relative to baseline). There was a wide range of methodological quality, and few studies fully addressed context-specific issues such as weight gain and treatment switching.

CONCLUSION

Whether cannabis-based treatments for pediatric drug-resistant epilepsy represent good value for money has yet to be investigated. Economic evaluations of such treatments are needed and should address issues of particular importance in pediatric epilepsy, including weight gain over time, switching or discontinuation of treatments, effectiveness of interventions and comparators, and long-term effectiveness beyond the duration of available clinical studies.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION

CRD42018099591.

Stiripentol: A Novel Antiseizure Medication for the Management of Dravet Syndrome

Objective: To describe the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of stiripentol in the treatment of refractory seizures in patients with Dravet syndrome. Data Sources: A search of the English language literature was conducted using PubMed and MEDLINE (1978 to April 2019) with the search terms stiripentol, Dravet syndrome, and refractory epilepsy. Other resources included article bibliographies, prescribing information, and relevant trials at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ . Study Selection and Data Extraction: All phase 1, 2, or 3 trials; observational studies; and retrospective studies were analyzed. Data Synthesis: In controlled studies, stiripentol has been shown to reduce seizure frequency by 50% or more in 40% to 70% of patients with Dravet syndrome. Reductions in seizure duration and episodes of status epilepticus have also been documented. Common adverse effects include somnolence and anorexia. Stiripentol inhibits the metabolism of clobazam and valproate, often requiring dose adjustment. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: Stiripentol, a direct allosteric modulator of GABAA receptors, offers a novel approach to treatment in patients with Dravet syndrome, both with and without pathogenic variants of the sodium channel α-1 subunit gene, and potentially other refractory seizures. Although available outside the United States for a decade, it was only recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for patients 2 years of age and older with Dravet syndrome taking clobazam. Conclusions: Stiripentol is an effective adjunctive therapy for reducing the frequency and duration of refractory seizures in patients with Dravet syndrome. Its role in the treatment of other refractory epilepsies requires further study.