1
|
Ingrosso G, Festa E, Caini S, Ponti E, Francolini G, Doccioli C, Lancia A, Fondelli S, Santini R, Valeriani M, Rago L, Bruni A, Augurio A, Trippa F, Russo D, Tamburo M, Parisi S, Borghesi S, Gomellini S, Scoccianti S, Musio D, Stefanacci M, Facondo G, Statuto T, Miranda G, Santo B, Di Marzo A, Bellavita R, Vinciguerra A, Livi L, Aristei C, Detti B. Hypofractionated radiotherapy in elderly patients (≥75 years) affected by localized prostate cancer: a multicenter retrospective analysis from the IPOPROMISE study. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2025:10.1038/s41391-025-00962-z. [PMID: 40097628 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-025-00962-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2024] [Revised: 02/16/2025] [Accepted: 03/07/2025] [Indexed: 03/19/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate Cancer (PCa) is the second leading cause of cancer death in the elderly (≥75 years). There is currently little data on hypofractionated radiotherapy in older patients affected by localized PCa. We present the long-term results of hypofractionated radiotherapy in elderly patients with localized PCa from the IPOPROMISE database. MATERIALS AND METHODS retrospective analysis of 719 PCa elderly (≥75 years) patients treated with daily volumetric image-guided hypofractionated radiotherapy between 2007 and 2020. For survival endpoints, we used Kaplan-Meier survival curves and univariate and multivariable Cox's proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS Median age at PCa diagnosis was 78.4 years (interquartile [IQR], 76.8-80.3 years), 74% of patients had a modified Charlson co-morbidity index (elderly-PCa-CCI, (e-PCCI)) of 0. Based on NCCN risk grouping, 399 patients (55.5%) were affected by unfavorable to very high-risk disease. Median follow-up was 4.2 years (IQR 2.4-6.4 years). 31/719 (4.3%) patients died from any cause. At 5 years, overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and metastasis-free survival were 95.6% (95% CI 93.4-97.1%), 99.2% (95%CI 97.9-99.7%), and 97.3% (95% CI 95.1-98.5%), respectively. In multivariate analysis, baseline PSA, and Gleason score were associated with MFS. On univariate analysis, e-PCCI ≥ 2 was associated with OS (p = 0.02). The 5-year freedom from late grade ≥2 gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity were 95.1% (95% CI 93.0-96.5%) and 96.7% (95% CI 93.7-97.1%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Our results represent a valuable add-on to the current literature, confirming the prominent role of radiotherapy in the cure of elderly fit patients affected by localized disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianluca Ingrosso
- Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy.
| | - Eleonora Festa
- Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Saverio Caini
- Cancer Risk Factors and Lifestyle Epidemiology Unit, Institute for Cancer Research, Prevention and Clinical Network (ISPRO), 50139, Florence, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Ponti
- Radiation Oncology Department, San Giovanni Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Giulio Francolini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Chiara Doccioli
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Institute for Cancer Research, Prevention and Clinical Network (ISPRO), 50139, Florence, Italy
| | - Andrea Lancia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Policlinico San Matteo Pavia Fondazione IRCCS, Pavia, Italy
| | - Simona Fondelli
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Santa Maria Annunziata Hospital, Department of Oncology, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy
| | - Roberto Santini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ospedale San Jacopo Pistoia, Pistoia, Italy
| | - Maurizio Valeriani
- Radiotherapy Oncology, Department of Medicine and Surgery and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, S. Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Luciana Rago
- Radiation Oncology Unit, IRCCS-CROB, Rionero in Vulture, Potenza, Italy
| | - Alessio Bruni
- Radiation Therapy Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Antonietta Augurio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, "SS Annunziata" Hospital, "G. D'Annunzio" University, Chieti, Italy
| | - Fabio Trippa
- Department of Radiotherapy, Saint Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy
| | | | - Maria Tamburo
- Radiotherapy Unit, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy
| | - Silvana Parisi
- Radiation Oncology Unit - Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Simona Borghesi
- Radiation Oncology Unit of Arezzo-Valdarno, Azienda USL Toscana Sud Est, Arezzo, Italy
| | - Sara Gomellini
- Radiation Oncology Department, San Giovanni Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Silvia Scoccianti
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Santa Maria Annunziata Hospital, Department of Oncology, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy
| | - Daniela Musio
- Radiation Oncology Department, San Giovanni Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Stefanacci
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ospedale San Jacopo Pistoia, Pistoia, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Facondo
- Radiotherapy Oncology, Department of Medicine and Surgery and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, S. Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Teodora Statuto
- Radiation Oncology Unit, IRCCS-CROB, Rionero in Vulture, Potenza, Italy
| | - Giulia Miranda
- Radiation Therapy Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Bianca Santo
- Radiotherapy Unit, Ospedale "Vito Fazzi", Lecce, Italy
| | | | - Rita Bellavita
- Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Annamaria Vinciguerra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, "SS Annunziata" Hospital, "G. D'Annunzio" University, Chieti, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Livi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Cynthia Aristei
- Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Beatrice Detti
- Radiation Oncology Unit of Prato, Azienda USL Centro Toscana, Prato, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Longhi A, Marrari A, Tetta C, Parmeggiani A, Parise O, Ferrari C, Salvi F, Frezza G. The Critical Role of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Multimodal Treatment of Lung Metastasis from Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:3593. [PMID: 39518034 PMCID: PMC11544818 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16213593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2024] [Revised: 10/15/2024] [Accepted: 10/19/2024] [Indexed: 11/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is increasingly used to treat lung metastasis (LM) in patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS) and bone sarcoma (BS). METHODS This retrospective study evaluated the outcomes of patients with BS and STS treated with SBRT for LM between 2010 and 2023. RESULTS We enrolled 102 patients (51 each with STS and BS), of whom 71 were males and 31 were females (median age, 40 years; range, 11-81 years). At diagnosis, 76 and 26 patients had localized and metastatic disease, respectively, with a median of 4 recurrences (range, 1-12). Before SBRT, 75 patients received chemotherapy and 52 underwent surgery for LM, with 276 nodules treated with SBRT (median dose, 48 Gy; range, 40-52). Local control of irradiated LM was 86% at 1 year and 78% at 2 years. By 31 December 2023 (median follow-up, 4.8 years), 60 patients had died and 42 survived (20 without ongoing disease). From the first LM relapse, the median overall survival (OS) was 4.8 years and the 5-year OS was 49% (95% confidence interval, 39-60%), with no difference between STS and BS; the median OS was 2.9 years and the 5-year OS was 36% after SBRT. Chemotherapy before SBRT was a negative prognostic factor by multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS Long-term follow-up shows that SBRT as part of a multimodal treatment approach has reasonable survival rates in patients with LM due to sarcoma. Compared with historical results using only surgery and chemotherapy, SBRT has improved the 5-year OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Longhi
- Struttura Complessa Osteoncologia, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), 40136 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Andrea Marrari
- Struttura Complessa Osteoncologia, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), 40136 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Cecilia Tetta
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands; (C.T.); (O.P.)
| | - Anna Parmeggiani
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Osp Ceccarini, 47838 Riccione, Italy;
| | - Orlando Parise
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands; (C.T.); (O.P.)
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Cristina Ferrari
- Laboratorio di Oncologia Sperimentale, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), 40136 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Fabrizio Salvi
- Unita’Operativa di Radioterapia, Ospedale Bellaria, Via Altura 3, 40139 Bologna, Italy; (F.S.); (G.F.)
| | - Giovanni Frezza
- Unita’Operativa di Radioterapia, Ospedale Bellaria, Via Altura 3, 40139 Bologna, Italy; (F.S.); (G.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Deodato F, Pezzulla D, Cilla S, Romano C, Ferro M, Galietta E, Lancellotta V, Morganti AG, Macchia G. Stereotactic Radiosurgery with Volumetric Modulated Arc Radiotherapy: Final Results of a Multi-arm Phase I Trial (DESTROY-2). Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2024; 36:632-641. [PMID: 38971684 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2024.06.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Revised: 05/16/2024] [Accepted: 06/13/2024] [Indexed: 07/08/2024]
Abstract
AIMS To present the final results of a phase I trial on stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) delivered using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in patients with primary or metastatic tumors in different extracranial sites. MATERIALS AND METHODS The DESTROY-2 trial, planned as a prospective dose escalation study in oligometastatic (one to five lesions) cancer patients relied on the delivery of a single high dose of radiation utilizing high-precision technology. The primary study endpoint was the definition of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of SRS-VMAT. The secondary objectives of the study were the evaluation of safety, efficacy, and long-term outcomes. All patients consecutively observed at our radiotherapy unit matching the inclusion criteria were enrolled. Each enrolled subject was included in a different phase I study arm, depending on the tumor site and the disease stage (lung, liver, bone, other), and sequentially assigned to a particular dose level. RESULTS Two hundred twenty seven lesions in 164 consecutive patients (male/female: 97/67, median age: 68 years; range: 29-92) were treated. The main primary tumors were: prostate cancer (60 patients), colorectal cancer (47 patients), and breast cancer (39 patients). The maximum planned dose level was achieved in all study arms, and the MTD was not exceeded. 34 Gy, 32 Gy, 24 Gy, and 24 Gy were established as the single-fraction doses for treating lung, liver, bone, and other extracranial lesions, respectively. The prescribed BED 2Gyα/β:10 to the planning target volume ranged from 26.4 Gy to 149.6 Gy. Twenty-seven patients (16.5%) experienced grade 1-2 and only one grade 3 acute toxicity, which was a pulmonary one. In terms of late toxicity, we registered only 5 toxicity>G2: a G3 gastro-intestinal one, three G3 bone toxicity, and a G3 laryngeal toxicity. The overall response was available for 199 lesions: 107 complete response (53.8%), 50 partial response (25.1%), and 31 stable disease (15.6%), leading to an overall response rate of 94.5%. Progression was registered only in 11 cases (5.5%). The overall response rate in each arm ranged from 88.6% to 96.4%. The overall two-year local control, distant metastasis free survival, disease free survival, and overall survival were 81.7%, 33.0%, 25.4%, and 78.7% respectively. CONCLUSION In conclusion, the planned doses of 34 Gy, 32 Gy, 24 Gy, and 24 Gy were successfully administered as single-fractions for the treatment of lung, liver, bone, and other extracranial lesions, respectively, in a prospective SRS dose-escalation trial. No dose-limiting toxicities were registered, and minimal acute and late toxicity were reported. New indications for SRS are currently being studied in oligoprogressive patients receiving targeted drugs or in combination with immunotherapy. The DESTROY-2 trial represents, in our opinion, a credible starting point for future modern radiosurgery trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Deodato
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Responsible Research Hospital, Campobasso, Italy; Radiology Institute, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome 00135, Italy
| | - D Pezzulla
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Responsible Research Hospital, Campobasso, Italy.
| | - S Cilla
- Medical Physics Unit, Responsible Research Hospital, Campobasso, Italy
| | - C Romano
- Medical Physics Unit, Responsible Research Hospital, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Mi Ferro
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Responsible Research Hospital, Campobasso, Italy
| | - E Galietta
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic, and Specialty Medicine - DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum Bologna, University, Bologna, Italy; Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - V Lancellotta
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Rome, Italy
| | - A G Morganti
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic, and Specialty Medicine - DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum Bologna, University, Bologna, Italy; Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - G Macchia
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Responsible Research Hospital, Campobasso, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ingrosso G, Lancia A, Festa E, Pisani AR, Bellavita R, Aristei C, Detti B. The investigational role of cytoreductive stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) to the primary tumor in metastatic kidney cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2024; 24:477-479. [PMID: 38682638 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2024.2349783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2024] [Accepted: 04/26/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Gianluca Ingrosso
- Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Andrea Lancia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Policlinico San Matteo Pavia Fondazione IRCCS, Pavia, Italy
| | - Eleonora Festa
- Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Antonio Rosario Pisani
- Section of Nuclear Medicine, Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - Rita Bellavita
- Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Cynthia Aristei
- Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Beatrice Detti
- Radiation Oncology Department, USL Centro Toscana - Prato, Prato, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy and Immunotherapy for Older Patients with Oligometastases: A Proposed Paradigm by the International Geriatric Radiotherapy Group. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 15:cancers15010244. [PMID: 36612239 PMCID: PMC9818761 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15010244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2022] [Revised: 12/21/2022] [Accepted: 12/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
The standard of care for metastatic disease is systemic therapy. A unique subset of patients with limited metastatic disease defined as distant involvement of five anatomic sites or less (oligometastases) have a better chance of remission or improved survival and may benefit from local treatments such as surgery or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). However, to prevent further spread of disease, systemic treatment such as chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and hormonal therapy may be required. Older patients (70 years old or above) or physiologically frail younger patients with multiple co-morbidities may not be able to tolerate the conventional chemotherapy due to its toxicity. In addition, those with a good performance status may not receive optimal chemotherapy due to concern about toxicity. Recently, immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) has become a promising approach only in the management of program death ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive tumors. Thus, a treatment method that elicits induction of PD-L1 production by tumor cells may allow all patients with oligometastases to benefit from immunotherapy. In vitro studies have demonstrated that high dose of radiotherapy may induce formation of PD-L1 in various tumors as a defense mechanism against inflammatory T cells. Clinical studies also corroborated those observations. Thus, SBRT, with its high precision to minimize damage to normal organs, may be a potential treatment of choice for older patients with oligometastases due to its synergy with immunotherapy. We propose a protocol combining SBRT to achieve a minimum radiobiologic equivalent dose around 59.5 Gy to all tumor sites if feasible, followed four to six weeks later by CPI for those cancer patients with oligometastases. All patients will be screened with frailty screening questionnaires to identify individuals at high risk for toxicity. The patients will be managed with an interdisciplinary team which includes oncologists, geriatricians, nurses, nutritionists, patient navigators, and social workers to manage all aspects of geriatric patient care. The use of telemedicine by the team may facilitate patient monitoring during treatment and follow-up. Preliminary data on toxicity, local control, survival, and progression-free survival may be obtained and serve as a template for future prospective studies.
Collapse
|
6
|
Ingrosso G, Bottero M, Becherini C, Caini S, Alì E, Lancia A, Ost P, Sanguineti G, Siva S, Zilli T, Francolini G, Bellavita R, Aristei C, Livi L, Detti B. A systematic review and meta-analysis on non-metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer: The radiation oncologist's perspective. Semin Oncol 2022; 49:409-418. [PMID: 36192243 DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2022.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Revised: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 09/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the second most common cause of cancer-related mortality in men. In patients undergoing a failure after radical treatment, one of the therapeutic option is androgen deprivation: despite initial response rates, a progression to a state of castration resistance is observed in most of the patients. In the present article, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of all clinical trials assessing treatment for nmCRPC with next-generation androgen receptor inhibitors. We performed a review and meta-analysis of phase III randomized controlled trials comparing new agents (apalutamide, enzalutamide, darolutamide) with placebo as control arm, in the setting of nmCRPC. Patients treated with next-generation ARIs had a 26% reduction in the risk of death compared with placebo; compared with other ARIs, darolutamide had the lowest rate of grade 3 and 4 AEs and the lowest therapy discontinuation rate due to any grade AEs. This meta-analysis shows that treatment with new ARIs is safe and significantly reduces the risk of death and of metastasis onset in nmCRPC patients. Under way studies on new biomarkers such as genomic classifiers will probably allow the stratification in more specific subsets of disease. New imaging modalities such as PSMA-PET have shown greater sensibility and specificity than conventional imaging in metastases detection. All patients were randomized in a 2:1 fashion, with a total of 2,694 who underwent next-generation ARIs (806 apalutamide, 955 darolutamide, 933 enzalutamide) and 1,423 in the placebo arm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianluca Ingrosso
- Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Science, University of Perugia, Italy
| | - Marta Bottero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Carlotta Becherini
- Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Saverio Caini
- Cancer Risk Factors and Lifestyle Epidemiology Unit, Institute for Cancer Research, Prevention, and Clinical Network (ISPRO), Florence, Italy
| | - Emanuele Alì
- Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Science, University of Perugia, Italy
| | - Andrea Lancia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Giuseppe Sanguineti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Shankar Siva
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Radiation Oncology Department. Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Giulio Francolini
- Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Rita Bellavita
- Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Science, University of Perugia, Italy
| | - Cynthia Aristei
- Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Science, University of Perugia, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Livi
- Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Beatrice Detti
- Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Multimodality Treatment with Radiotherapy and Immunotherapy in Older Adults: Rationale, Evolving Data, and Current Recommendations. Semin Radiat Oncol 2022; 32:142-154. [DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2021.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
|
8
|
SBRT for elderly oligometastatic patients as a feasible, safe and effective treatment opportunity. Clin Exp Metastasis 2021; 38:475-481. [PMID: 34487288 DOI: 10.1007/s10585-021-10122-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
The constantly increasing life expectancy is raising the issue of treating oncological older patients, who were traditionally candidates to best supportive care or palliative treatments. Several literature data support SBRT in the treatment of the oligometastatic patient as a potentially curable therapeutic option. However, data on older patients are lacking. This study presents the outcomes of a cohort of 61 oligometastatic patients over the age of 80 years who received SBRT, that was proposed to all patients with a minimum Karnofsky Performance Status ≥ 70 and a life expectancy of at least 6 months, with up to five oligometastatic lesions. Radiotherapy was delivered in 3-10 fractions with VMAT-IGRT technique. Toxicity was retrospectively collected according to CTCAE v4.0. Data were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed for assessing any potential predictive factor for clinical outcomes. A total of 90 oligometastases were treated in 61 patients with median age 82 years (range, 80-90). The most frequent histology was colorectal cancer (27% of cases). Median follow-up was 20 months (range, 2-63). Local control rates at 1- and 2-years were 98.8% and 88.2%, with colorectal histology being associated with worse LC rates (p = 0.014) at univariate analysis. Progression-free survival rates at 1- and 2-years were 48.6% and 30.5%. Oligorecurrent lesions and single oligometastases were associated with better PFS rates (respectively, p = 0.04 and p = 0.011). Overall survival rates were 75% and 60.5%, polymetastatic spread being predictive of worse survival outcomes at multivariate analysis (p = 0.012). No G2 or higher adverse events were recorded. Our study supports the role of SBRT for the treatment of elderly oligometastatic patients, highlighting the possibility to further explore this therapeutic option in the management of older oncological patients.
Collapse
|
9
|
Bonichon F, de Baere T, Berdelou A, Leboulleux S, Giraudet AL, Cuinet M, Drui D, Liberge R, Kelly A, Tenenbaum F, Legmann P, Do Cao C, Leenhardt L, Toubeau M, Godbert Y, Palussière J. Percutaneous thermal ablation of lung metastases from thyroid carcinomas. A retrospective multicenter study of 107 nodules. On behalf of the TUTHYREF network. Endocrine 2021; 72:798-808. [PMID: 33770383 DOI: 10.1007/s12020-020-02580-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2020] [Accepted: 11/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine efficacy and safety of thermal ablation (TA) for the local treatment of lung metastases of thyroid cancer. METHODS We retrospectively studied 47 patients from 10 centers treated by TA (radiofrequency, microwaves, and cryoablation) over 10 years. The endpoints were overall survival (OS), local efficacy, complications (CTCAE classification), and factors associated with survival. OS curves after first TA were built using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. RESULTS A total of 107 lung metastases during 75 sessions were treated by radiofrequency (n = 56), microwaves (n = 9), and cryoablation (n = 10). Median follow-up time after TA was 5.2 years (0.2-13.3). OS was 93% at 2 years (95% confidence interval (CI): 86-94) and 79% at 3 years (95% CI: 66-91). On univariate and multivariate analysis with a Cox model, histology was the only significant factor for OS. OS at 3 years was 94% for follicular, oncocytic, or papillary follicular variant carcinomas, compared to 59% for papillary, medullary, insular or anaplastic carcinomas (P = 0.0001). The local control rate was 98.1% at 1 year and 94.8% at 2, 3, 4, and 5 years. Morbidity was low with no major complications (grade 4 and 5 CTCAE) and no complications in 29 of 75 sessions (38.7%). CONCLUSIONS TA is a useful, safe and effective option for local treatment of lung metastases from thyroid carcinoma. Prolonged OS was obtained, especially for lung metastases from follicular, oncocytic, or papillary follicular variant carcinomas. Achieving disease control with TA delays the need for systemic treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Françoise Bonichon
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Thyroid Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France.
| | - Thierry de Baere
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Amandine Berdelou
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Cancer, Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Sophie Leboulleux
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Cancer, Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Marie Cuinet
- Department of Radiology, Léon Bérard Center, Lyon, France
| | - Delphine Drui
- Department of Endocrinology, Institut du Thorax, University Hospital, Nantes, France
| | - Renan Liberge
- Thoracic and General Radiology Department, University Hospital, Nantes, France
| | - Antony Kelly
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Jean Perrin Center, Clermont Ferrand, France
| | - Florence Tenenbaum
- Nuclear Medicine Service, Hôpital Cochin, 27 rue du Faubourg St Jacques, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Paul Legmann
- Department of radiology, Hôpital Cochin, 27 rue du Faubourg St Jacques, 75014, Paris, France
| | | | - Laurence Leenhardt
- Unité Thyroïde Tumeurs Endocrines, Sorbonne Université, AP-HP Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Michel Toubeau
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Yann Godbert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Thyroid Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Jean Palussière
- Department of Radiology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Oligometastatic Cancer: Key Concepts and Research Opportunities for 2021 and Beyond. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13112518. [PMID: 34063904 PMCID: PMC8196648 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13112518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2021] [Revised: 05/12/2021] [Accepted: 05/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Traditionally, clinicians distinguished three forms of cancer outgrowth [...].
Collapse
|
11
|
Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients with oligoprogression during androgen receptor-targeted therapy. Clin Transl Oncol 2021; 23:1577-1584. [PMID: 33495981 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-021-02553-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2020] [Accepted: 01/08/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To report outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients with oligoprogression (≤ 5 metastases) during first-line treatment with androgen receptor-targeted therapy (ARTT). PATIENTS AND METHODS Retrospective multi-institutional analysis of mCRPC patients treated with SBRT to oligoprogressive lesions during ARTT. End-points were time to next-line systemic treatment (NEST), radiological progression-free survival (r-PFS) and overall survival (OS). Toxicity was registered according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, univariate and multivariate analysis (MVA) were performed. RESULTS Data from 34 patients were analyzed. Median NEST-free survival, r-PFS, and OS were 16.97, 13.47, and 38.3 months, respectively. At MVA, factors associated with worse NEST-free survival and r-PFS were polymetastatic burden at diagnosis of metastatic hormone-sensitive disease (hazard ratio [HR] 3.66, p = 0.009; HR 3.03, p = 0.034), PSA ≤ 7 ng/ml at mCRPC diagnosis (HR 0.23, p = 0.017; HR 0.19, p = 0.006) and PSADT ≤ 3 months at mCRPC diagnosis (HR 3.39, p = 0.026; HR 2.79, p = 0.037). Polymetastatic state at mHSPC diagnosis was associated with a decreased OS (HR 4.68, p = 0.029). No patient developed acute or late grade ≥ 2 toxicity. CONCLUSION Our results suggest that SBRT in oligoprogressive mCPRC is safe, effective and seems to prolong the efficacy of the ongoing systemic treatment positively affecting disease progression. Prospective trials are needed.
Collapse
|
12
|
Systematic review of stereotactic body radiotherapy for nodal metastases. Clin Exp Metastasis 2021; 38:11-29. [PMID: 33452954 DOI: 10.1007/s10585-020-10071-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2020] [Accepted: 12/25/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this analysis was to assess the efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in terms of local control (LC) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with lymph node metastases (NMs) from solid tumors. A systematic literature search from the earliest date to July 25th, 2019 was performed following PRISMA guidelines. Papers reporting LC and/or PFS of NMs using SBRT (< 10 fractions) were selected. The clinical outcomes rates were pooled by means of a random or fixed-effect model. Twenty-nine studies were eligible (969 patients: 938 (LC) and 698 (PFS)). LC and PFS results were reported in 28 and 18 papers, respectively. Heterogeneity was observed in terms of patient and treatment characteristics. Pooled 2-year LC reported in 11 studies was 79.3% (95%CI, 72.8%-85.7%) with substantial heterogeneity between studies (Q2 test: p = 0.0083; I2 = 57.9%), while pooled 2-year PFS reported in 8 studies was 35.9% (95%CI, 22.1%-49.7%) with very high heterogeneity between studies (Q2 test: p < 0.0001; I2 = 86.1%). Grade ≥ 3 and Grade 5 toxicity rates were 2.0% and 0.2%, respectively. SBRT of NMs seems to be safe and effective in terms of LC. However, due to the marked heterogeneity of the included series, prospective studies are required.
Collapse
|
13
|
Defining oligometastatic disease from a radiation oncology perspective: An ESTRO-ASTRO consensus document. Radiother Oncol 2020; 148:157-166. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 412] [Impact Index Per Article: 82.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2020] [Accepted: 04/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
14
|
Whole breast external beam radiotherapy in elderly patients affected by left-sided early breast cancer: a dosimetric comparison between two simple free-breathing techniques. Aging Clin Exp Res 2020; 32:1335-1341. [PMID: 31429001 DOI: 10.1007/s40520-019-01312-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2019] [Accepted: 08/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Elderly breast cancer patients are frequently affected by significant comorbidities that make sophisticated radiotherapy treatments particularly challenging. AIMS We dosimetrically analyzed two different simple free-breathing external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) techniques for the hypofractionated treatment of the left breast in elderly patients with a low compliance, to compare target coverage, and heart and left anterior descending coronary artery (LADCA) sparing. METHODS We developed radiation plans for 24 elderly patients using 3D conformal (3DCRT) field-in-field tangential technique and intensity-modulated (IMRT) tangential beam technique. Dose-Volume-Histograms (DVHs) were used to provide a quantitative comparison between plans. RESULTS The median breast volume was 645 cm3. IMRT and 3DCRT plans comparison demonstrated no significant differences in terms of organ sparing for the heart. Regarding LADCA, mean dose (10.3 ± 9.5 Gy vs 11.9 ± 9.6 Gy, p = 0.0003), maximum dose (26.1 ± 16.1 Gy vs 29.1 ± 16.1 Gy, p = 0.004) and V17 Gy (21.5% ± 26.9% vs 25.0% ± 27.2%, p = 0.002) significantly decreased using IMRT compared with 3DCRT. IMRT plans showed a better target coverage compared with 3DCRT (0.91 ± 0.05 vs 0.93 ± 0.04, p = 0.05). DISCUSSION Comparing the two different EBRT techniques, we demonstrated few, although substantial, dosimetric differences in terms of doses to the organs at risk characterized by a statistically significant dose reduction of LADCA in the IMRT plans. CONCLUSIONS Elderly patients with a low compliance to treatment might benefit from 3DCRT with field-in-field tangential arrangement or from a simple IMRT approach. IMRT should be preferred.
Collapse
|
15
|
Kissel M, Rambeau A, Achkar S, Lecuru F, Mathevet P. Challenges and advances in cervix cancer treatment in elder women. Cancer Treat Rev 2020; 84:101976. [PMID: 32006796 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2020.101976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2019] [Revised: 01/20/2020] [Accepted: 01/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
With population ageing, cancer treatments in elder patients is becoming a true public health care issue. There is an authentic dilemma between patient's frailty, residual life expectancy and the toll that take anticancer treatments. Since elder patients are almost always excluded from clinical trials, it is hard to get robust scientific data on the tolerability of oncologic treatments and to set in place recommendations. Cervix cancer is traditionally diagnosed in younger women but it has a 2nd incidence peak between 60 and 70 years old. Cervix cancer in elder patients is a subject to many questions in terms of screening and is a therapeutic challenge. This article reviews literature data on these different aspects, from screening to surgery, from radiotherapy to brachytherapy, from chemotherapy to supportive care, from immunotherapy to geriatric assessment. We tried to show how modern therapeutic innovations may benefit elder patients. Expected benefits in terms of efficacy and toxicity may overcome the long-lasting tendency to undertreatment in elder patients and improve their quality of life after cancer treatment. In 2020, there seems to be less and less reasons justifying that elder women with cervix cancer may not receive the appropriate treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Kissel
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
| | - A Rambeau
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, ARCHADE, Caen, France
| | - S Achkar
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - F Lecuru
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Paris, France
| | - P Mathevet
- Gynecology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Chierchini S, Ingrosso G, Saldi S, Stracci F, Aristei C. Physician And Patient Barriers To Radiotherapy Service Access: Treatment Referral Implications. Cancer Manag Res 2019; 11:8829-8833. [PMID: 31632142 PMCID: PMC6789154 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s168941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2019] [Accepted: 09/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy is one of the mainstays of cancer treatment, and about 60% of cancer patients receive this type of treatment during their course of treatment. An evident gap between optimal and actual radiotherapy utilization proportions has recently been reported, which has been ascribed to lack of referral to radiation oncology. There are many factors influencing the radiotherapy referral, including patient anxiety about toxicity, wrong perception of efficacy and side effects by physicians and patients, insufficient knowledge of referral process. These factors, defined as barriers can be categorized in health system barriers, physician and patient barriers. In the present brief narrative review, we discussed barriers to radiotherapy referral focusing on physician and patient barriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Chierchini
- Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Gianluca Ingrosso
- Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Simonetta Saldi
- Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Stracci
- Department of Experimental Medicine, Section of Public Health, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Cynthia Aristei
- Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|