Monitoring alloimmune response in kidney transplantation

Low-MFI (median fluorescence intensity) pre-transplant DSA (donor specific antibodies) leading to anamnestic antibody mediated rejection in live-related donor kidney transplantation

"In solid organ transplantation, the compatibility between recipient and donor relies on testing prior to transplantation as a major determinant for the successful transplant outcomes. This compatibility testing depends on the detection of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) present in the recipient. Indeed, sensitized transplant candidates are at higher risk of allograft rejection and graft loss compared to non-sensitized individuals. Most of the laboratories in India have adopted test algorithms for the appropriate risk stratification of transplants, namely: 1) donor cell-based flow-cytometric cross-match (FCXM) assay with patient's serum to detect DSAs; 2) HLA-coated beads to detect anti-HLA antibodies; and 3) complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDCXM) with donor cells to detect cytotoxic antibodies. In the risk stratification strategy, laboratories generally accept a DSA median fluorescence index (MFI) of 1000 MFI or lower MFI (low-MFI) as a negative value and clear the patient for the transplant. We present two cases of live-related donor kidney transplants (LDKTs) with low-MFI pre-transplant DSA values who experienced an early acute antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) as a result of an anamnestic antibody response by DSA against HLA class II antibodies. These results were confirmed by retesting of both pre-transplant and post-transplant archived sera from patients and freshly obtained donor cells. Our examples indicate a possible ABMR in patients with low MFI pre-transplant DSA. Reclassification of low vs. high-risk may be appropriate for sensitized patients with low-MFI DSA."

The frequency of peripheral PD-1+ TCD4+ cells is reversely associated with serum creatinine levels in recipients of kidney allografts

The long-term survival of solid organ allografts remains a challenge for organ transplantation systems worldwide. T-cell exhaustion has been supposed to be associated with immunologic tolerance in transplantation and might reflect the immunologic status in recipients. The aim of the present study was to compare the TCD4+ cells of kidney transplant recipients with high and low serum creatinine levels for their expressions of PD-1 and TIGIT as two well-known exhaustion markers. Blood samples were taken from 20 kidney allograft recipients with serum creatinine levels above 2 mg/dL and 20 recipients with creatinine levels below 2 mg/dL. The percentages of PD-1+ CD4+ and TIGIT+ CD4+ cells were analyzed along with the evaluation of TNF-α, IFN-γ, and IL-10 release from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). The patients with serum creatinine levels below 2 mg/dL demonstrated a higher frequency of PD-1+ CD4+ T-cells (p = 0.003) along with lower TNF-α secretion from PBMCs (p = 0.028). The frequency of PD-1 + CD4+ T-cells was reversely correlated with the serum creatinine levels in recipients of kidney allografts (r = 0.59, p < 0.001). Besides, the MFI of TIGIT on TCD4+ cells demonstrated a trend for higher expression in patients with serum creatinine levels below 2 mg/dL (p = 0.070). The expression of PD-1+ on CD4+ T-cells demonstrated a potential for estimation of the immunologic status of the host in interaction with alloantigens. The exhaustion markers could be regarded as potential diagnostic indicators for the evaluation of immunologic tolerance in renal transplantation.

The IMBG Test for Evaluating the Pharmacodynamic Response to Immunosuppressive Therapy in Kidney Transplant Patients: Current Evidence and Future Applications

Immunosuppressive drugs are widely used to prevent rejection after kidney transplantation. However, the pharmacological response to a given immunosuppressant can vary markedly between individuals, with some showing poor treatment responses and/or experiencing serious side effects. There is an unmet need for diagnostic tools that allow clinicians to individually tailor immunosuppressive therapy to a patient’s immunological profile. The Immunobiogram (IMBG) is a novel blood-based in vitro diagnostic test that provides a pharmacodynamic readout of the immune response of individual patients to a range of immunosuppressants commonly used in kidney transplant recipients. Here, we discuss the current approaches used to measure the pharmacodynamic responses of individual patients to specific immunosuppressive drugs in vitro, which can then be correlated with patient’s clinical outcomes. We also describe the procedure of the IMBG assay, and summarize the results obtained using the IMBG in different kidney transplant populations. Finally, we outline future directions and other novel applications of the IMBG, both in kidney transplant patients and other autoimmune diseases.

Population Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes from the Renal Transplant Outcome Prediction Validation Study (TOPVAS)

Kidney transplantation is the preferred method for selected patients with kidney failure. Despite major improvements over the last decades, a significant proportion of organs are still lost every year. Causes of graft loss and impaired graft function are incompletely understood and prognostic tools are lacking. Here, we describe baseline characteristics and outcomes of the non-interventional Transplant Outcome Prediction Validation Study (TOPVAS). A total of 241 patients receiving a non-living kidney transplant were recruited in three Austrian transplantation centres and treated according to local practices. Clinical information as well as blood and urine samples were obtained at baseline and consecutive follow-ups up to 24 months. Out of the overall 16 graft losses, 11 occurred in the first year. The patient survival rate was 96.7% (95% CI: 94.3-99.1%) in the first year and 94.3% (95% CI: 91.1-97.7%) in the second year. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) improved from 37.1 ± 14.0 mL/min/1.73 m² at hospital discharge to 45.0 ± 14.5 mL/min/1.73 m² at 24 months. The TOPVAS study provides information on current kidney graft and patient survival, eGFR trajectories, and rejection rates, as well as infectious and surgical complication rates under different immunosuppressive drug regimens. More importantly, it provides an extensive and well-characterized biobank for the future discovery and validation of prognostic methods.

Memory B cells and long-lived plasma cells in AMR

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) has a strongly negative impact on long-term renal allograft survival. Currently, no recognized effective treatments are available, especially for chronic antibody-mediated rejection (CAMR). Donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) secreted by long-lived plasma cells and memory B cells are acknowledged as biomarkers of AMR. Nevertheless, it may be too late for the DSA routine examination production since DSAs may have binded to graft vascular endothelial cells through complement-dependent or complement-independent pathways. Therefore, methods to effectively monitor memory B cells and long-lived plasma cells and subsequently prevent DSA production are key to reducing the adverse effects of AMR. Therefore, this review mainly summarizes the production pathways of memory B cells and long-lived plasma cells and provides suggestions for the prevention of AMR after transplantation.

Patient-Derived Avatar Mouse Model to Predict the Liver Immune Homeostasis of Long-Term Stable Liver Transplant Patients

Although rejection or tolerance can occur in liver transplantation (LT) patients, there are no reliable non-invasive methods for predicting immune homeostasis. In this study, we developed a humanized mouse model to predict liver immune homeostasis in patients who underwent LT. The patient-derived avatar model was developed by injecting peripheral blood mononuclear cells from healthy controls (HCs) or LT patients with stable, rejection, or tolerance into NOD.Cg-Prkdc^scidIL2rg^tm1Wjl/SzJ (NSG) mice, followed by injection of human hepatic stellate cells and Carbone tetrachloride (CCl₄). After 7 weeks, the patient’s T-cell engraftment and liver inflammation in the avatar model were evaluated and compared with the liver histology of LT patients. Changes in liver inflammation following treatment with tacrolimus and/or biguanide derivatives were also examined. The C-X-C Motif Chemokine Receptor 3 (CXCR3)-dependently engrafted patient T cells led to differences in liver inflammation in our model according to the status of LT patients. The livers of avatar models from rejection patients had severe inflammation with more T helper 17 cells and fewer regulatory T cells compared to those of models from tolerance and HCs showing only mild inflammation. Moreover, our model classified stable post-LT patients into severe and mild inflammation groups, which correlated well with liver immunity in these patients. Our models revealed alleviation of inflammation after combination treatment with tacrolimus and biguanide derivatives or monotherapy. Consequently, using our new patient-derived avatar model, we predicted liver immune homeostasis in patients with stable LT without biopsy. Moreover, our avatar model may be useful for preclinical analysis to evaluate treatment responses while reducing risks to patients.

Current Desensitization Strategies in Heart Transplantation

Heart transplant candidates sensitized to HLA antigens wait longer for transplant, are at increased risk of dying while waiting, and may not be listed at all. The increasing prevalence of HLA sensitization and limitations of current desensitization strategies underscore the urgent need for a more effective approach. In addition to pregnancy, prior transplant, and transfusions, patients with end-stage heart failure are burdened with unique factors placing them at risk for HLA sensitization. These include homograft material used for congenital heart disease repair and left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). Moreover, these risks are often stacked, forming a seemingly insurmountable barrier in some cases. While desensitization protocols are typically implemented uniformly, irrespective of the mode of sensitization, the heterogeneity in success and post-transplant outcomes argues for a more tailored approach. Achieving this will require progress in our understanding of the immunobiology underlying the innate and adaptive immune response to these varied allosensitizing exposures. Further attention to B cell activation, memory, and plasma cell differentiation is required to establish methods that durably abrogate the anti-HLA antibody response before and after transplant. The contribution of non-HLA antibodies to the net state of sensitization and the potential implications for graft longevity also remain to be comprehensively defined. The aim of this review is to first bring forth select issues unique to the sensitized heart transplant candidate. The current literature on desensitization in heart transplantation will then be summarized providing context within the immune response. Building on this, newer approaches with therapeutic potential will be discussed emphasizing the importance of not only addressing the short-term pathogenic consequences of circulating HLA antibodies, but also the need to modulate alloimmune memory.

Immunological follow-up of patients with renal transplants: A proposal for clinical practice in Colombia

Graft damage is a process that starts at the moment of transplantation, due to comorbidities of receptor, donor status, ischemia time, ischemia-reperfusion phenomenon, among others, those induce metabolic and immune factors that ultimately trigger clinical manifestations of graft dysfunction. However, the preclinical progression between the time of transplantation and the appearance of signs and symptoms of graft damage can take weeks to years. Therefore, the implementation of rational monitoring approaches during the post-transplantation period is critical and should include not only the clinical follow-up but also anticipate immunological graft damage. In the present essay, we propose an immunological monitoring algorithm for the post-renal transplantation period.

Evaluation of cell-mediated immune response by QuantiFERON Monitor Assay in kidney transplant recipients presenting with infective complications

The net level of immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients is difficult to assess. QuantiFERON Monitor (QFM) is an in vitro diagnostic test that detects interferon-γ (IFN-γ) release in peripheral blood. The aim of our study was to compare QFM testing results in stable kidney transplant recipients and kidney transplant recipients with infection, in a single-centre cohort.We enrolled 71 kidney transplant recipients from our transplantation centre. They were divided into 2 groups according to clinical presentation (Stable kidney transplant recipients or Infection).There were no significant differences in interferon-γ release between the 2 groups (Stable kidney transplant recipients 140.59 ± 215.28 IU/ml, Infection group 78.37 ± 197.03 IU/ml, P = .24). A further analysis revealed that kidney transplant recipients presenting with bacterial infection had significantly lower IFN-γ release when compared to stable kidney transplant recipients (26.52 ± 42.46 IU/ml vs 140.59 ± 215.28 IU/ml, P = .04).Kidney transplant recipients presenting with bacterial infection had lower IFN-γ release when compared to stable kidney transplant recipients. The QFM test may be useful as a tool to help guide immunosuppression dosing in kidney transplant recipients, but further studies are required to confirm its diagnostic value.

Mechanisms of organ transplant injury mediated by B cells and antibodies: Implications for antibody-mediated rejection

Recent adjustments to the histological diagnosis and the introduction of molecular classification are providing renewed support for the paradigm that antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is an important clinical problem for which there is an urgent need for better therapies. Acute ABMR is observed when the graft is exposed to rapid increases in high-titer donor-specific antibodies (DSA) that are most often generated as anamnestic responses in sensitized recipients or de novo responses in nonsensitized patients who are nonadherent. Chronic ABMR is associated with slower increases in DSA, which may be high or low titer and transient or persistent. These DSA elicit cycles of injury and repair that manifest as multilamination of the peritubular capillary basement membrane or arteriopathy manifesting as intimal fibrosis. Mitigating the problem of AMBR requires the anamnestic and de novo DSA responses to be prevented and established DSA responses to be reversed. To this end, a better understanding of the immunobiology of DSA production is necessary and also the development of assays capable of detecting early humoral immune responses.Recent advances in understanding the immunobiology of B cells and areas requiring further investigation that might lead to new therapies or better diagnosis are discussed in this review.

Optimization of tacrolimus in kidney transplantation: New pharmacokinetic perspectives

Tacrolimus is the cornerstone of immunosuppressive therapy after kidney transplantation (KT), but its use is complicated by a narrow therapeutic index and high inter- and intra-patient pharmacokinetic variability. There are three available oral formulations of tacrolimus: immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-Tac), extended-release tacrolimus (ER-Tac) and a MeltDose® (LCPT) formulation, the latter favoring a prolonged drug release and increased bioavailability. The time-concentration curves of these formulations are different. Compared with IR-Tac and ER-Tac, LCPT has a relatively flat pharmacokinetic profile with less fluctuation between trough and peak exposures, and a delayed peak concentration. This translates to a more stable delivery of tacrolimus and may alleviate the risk of underexposure and allograft rejection or overexposure and toxicity. The once-daily formulation of both ER-TAC and LCPT may also offer a potential advantage on patient adherence. Fast metabolizers of tacrolimus, the elderly, and human leukocyte antigen-sensitized patients are at risk of poorer outcomes after KT, possibly associated with a different exhibited pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus or different requirements in terms of exposure. Simple, practical strategies are needed to identify patients at risk of suboptimal KT outcomes and those who would benefit from a more proactively personalized approach to tacrolimus treatment. This review aims to increase awareness of the link between the pharmacokinetics of oral tacrolimus formulations and the clinical needs of patients after KT, particularly among those who have clinically significant pharmacokinetic variation of tacrolimus.

Combination of calcineurin and mTOR inhibitors in kidney transplantation: a propensity score analysis based on current clinical practice

INTRODUCTION

The TRANSFORM study demonstrated that an immunosuppression based on a combination of calcineurin inhibitors and de-novo mTOR inhibitors (mTORi) is safe and effective in kidney transplant recipients. However, data that validate this approach in clinical practice are currently missing.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Analysis of 401 kidney transplant recipients transplanted from June 2013 to December 2016. All patients received tacrolimus with prednisone in combination with either mycophenolate (n = 186) or mTORi (either everolimus or sirolimus, n = 215). A propensity score to receive mTORi was calculated based on the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) from the following parameters: age and sex of donor and recipient, BMI, previous transplants, diabetes, cPRA, dialysis before transplantation, dialysis vintage, type of donor, ABO-incompatibility, HLA-mismatches, induction and ischemia time. Median follow-up was 2.6 [1.9; 3.7] years.

RESULTS

Cox-regression analysis suggests good results for mTORi versus MPA in terms of 1-year biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR, P = 0.063), 1-year graft loss (P = 0.025) and patient survival (P < 0.001). Results observed for BPAR and graft failure were largely attributed to those patients that would have been excluded by the TRANSFORM because of some exclusion criteria (52.9% of the population, P = 0.003 for 1-year BPAR and P = 0.040 for graft loss). In patients who met selection criteria for TRANSFORM, no effect of treatment for BPAR or graft failure was observed, while the beneficial effect on overall survival persisted.

CONCLUSIONS

In a real-life setting, a protocol based on de-novo mTORi with tacrolimus and prednisone could be employed as a standard immunosuppressive regimen and was associated with good outcomes.

LCK as a Potential Therapeutic Target for Acute Rejection after Kidney Transplantation: A Bioinformatics Clue

Objectives

We aim to identify the key biomarker of acute rejection (AR) after kidney transplantation via bioinformatics methods.

Methods

The gene expression data GSE75693 of 30 samples with stable kidney transplantation recipients and 15 AR samples were downloaded and analyzed by the limma package to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Then, Gene Ontology (GO) functional enrichment analysis and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis were done to explore the biological functions and potential important pathways of DEGs. Finally, protein-protein interactions (PPIs) and literature mining were applied to construct the cocitation network and to select the hub protein.

Results

A total of 437 upregulated genes and 353 downregulated genes were selected according to P < 0.01 and |log₂(fold change)| > 1.0. DEGs of AR are mainly located on membranes and impact the activation of receptors in immune responses. In the PPI network, Src kinase, lymphocyte kinase (LCK), CD3G, B2M, interferon-γ, CD3D, tumor necrosis factor, VAV1, and CD3E in the T cell receptor signaling pathway were selected as important factors, and LCK was identified as the hub protein.

Conclusion

LCK, via acting on T-cell receptor, might be a potential therapeutic target for AR after kidney transplantation.