Implementation of a frailty screening programme and Geriatric Assessment Service in a nephrology centre: a quality improvement project

Nephrology-tailored geriatric assessment as decision-making tool in kidney failure

BACKGROUND

Dialysis might not benefit all older patients with kidney failure, particularly those with multimorbid conditions and frailty. Patients' and healthcare professionals' awareness of the presence of geriatric impairments could improve outcomes by tailoring treatment plans and decisions for individual patients.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to explore the perspectives of patients and healthcare professionals on nephrology-tailored geriatric assessment to fuel decision-making for treatment choices in older patients with kidney failure.

DESIGN

In an exploratory qualitative study using focus groups, participants discussed perspectives on the use and value of nephrology-tailored geriatric assessment for the decision-making process to start or forego dialysis.

PARTICIPANTS AND MEASUREMENTS

Patients (n = 18) with kidney failure, caregivers (n = 4), and professionals (n = 25) were purposively sampled from 10 hospitals. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and inductively analysed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Three main themes emerged that supported or impeded decision-making in kidney failure: (1) patient psycho-social situation; (2) patient-related factors on modality choice; (3) organisation of health care. Patients reported feeling vulnerable due to multiple chronic conditions, old age, experienced losses in life and their willingness to trade longevity for quality of life. Professionals recognised the added value of nephrology-tailored geriatric assessment in three major themes: (i) facilitating continual holistic assessment, (ii) filling the knowledge gap, and (iii) uncovering important patient characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

nephrology-tailored geriatric assessment was perceived as a valuable tool to identify geriatric impairments in older patients with kidney failure. Integration of its outcomes can facilitate a more holistic approach to inform choices and decisions about kidney replacement therapy.

Geriatric Assessment in CKD Care: An Implementation Study

Rationale & Objective

Older people with progressive chronic kidney disease (CKD) have complex health care needs. Geriatric evaluation preceding decision making for kidney replacement is recommended in guidelines, but implementation is lacking in routine care. We aimed to evaluate implementation of geriatric assessment in CKD care.

Study Design

Mixed methods implementation study.

Setting & Participants

Dutch nephrology centers were approached for implementation of geriatric assessment in patients aged ≥70 years and with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of ≤20 mL/min/1.73 m2.

Quality Improvement Activities/Exposure

We implemented a consensus-based nephrology-tailored geriatric assessment: a patient questionnaire and professionally administered test set comprising 16 instruments covering functional, cognitive, psychosocial, and somatic domains and patient-reported outcome measures.

Outcomes

We aimed for implementation in 10 centers and 200 patients. Implementation was evaluated by (i) perceived enablers and barriers of implementation, including integration in work routines (Normalization Measure Development Tool) and (ii) relevance of the instruments to routine care for the target population.

Analytical Approach

Variations in implementation practices were described based on field notes. The postimplementation survey among health care professionals was analyzed descriptively, using an explanatory qualitative approach for open-ended questions.

Results

Geriatric assessment was implemented in 10 centers among 191 patients. Survey respondents (n = 71, 88% response rate) identified determinants that facilitated implementation, ie, multidisciplinary collaboration (with geriatricians) -meetings and reports and execution of assessments by nurses. Barriers to implementation were patient illiteracy or language barrier, time constraints, and patient burden. Professionals considered geriatric assessment sufficiently integrated into work routines (mean, 6.7/10 ± 2.0 [SD]) but also subject to improvement. Likewise, the relevance of geriatric assessment for routine care was scored as 7.8/10 ± 1.2. The Clinical Frailty Score and Montreal Cognitive Assessment were perceived as the most relevant instruments.

Limitations

Selection bias of interventions' early adopters may limit generalizability.

Conclusions

Geriatric assessment could successfully be integrated in CKD care and was perceived relevant to health care professionals.

Narrative Review: Clinical Implications and Assessment of Frailty in Patients With Advanced CKD

Frailty is a multidimensional clinical syndrome characterized by low physical activity, reduced strength, accumulation of multiorgan deficits, decreased physiological reserve, and vulnerability to stressors. Frailty has key social, psychological, and cognitive implications. Frailty is accelerated by uremia, leading to a high prevalence of frailty in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) as well as contributing to adverse outcomes in this patient population. Frailty assessment is not routine in patients with CKD; however, a number of validated clinical assessment tools can assist in prognostication. Frailty assessment in nephrology populations supports shared decision-making and advanced communication and should inform key medical transitions. Frailty screening and interventions in CKD or ESKD are a developing research priority with a rapidly expanding literature base.

Is health-related quality of life trajectory associated with dialysis modality choice in advanced chronic kidney disease?

BACKGROUND

Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease have lower health-related quality of life (HRQOL) than the general population. There is uncertainty regarding patterns of HRQOL changes before dialysis initiation. This study aimed to characterise HRQOL trajectory and assess its potential association with intended dialysis modality.

METHODS

This prospective single-centre cohort study followed adults with an estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤15 mL/min/1.73 m2 for one year. Patients were allocated into one of two groups based on their intended treatment modality, 'home dialysis' (peritoneal dialysis or home haemodialysis (HD)) and 'other' (in-centre HD or conservative care). Follow-up was for up to 1 year or earlier if initiated on kidney replacement therapy or died. Kidney Disease Quality of Life - Short Form (KDQOL-SF) was completed every 6 months. Predictors of changes in KDQOL-SF components were modelled using mixed effect multivariable linear regressions.

RESULTS

One hundred and nine patients were included. At baseline, crude physical composite summary (PCS) (45 ± 10 vs. 39 ± 8) was higher in patients choosing home dialysis (n = 41), while mental composite summary (MCS) was similar in both groups. After adjustment, patients choosing home dialysis had an increase in MCS (B = 8.4 per year, p = 0.007) compared to those selecting in-centre HD/conservative care. This translates into an annual increase in MSC by 3 points for the 'home dialysis' group, compared to an annual decline by 5.4 points in the 'other' group. There was no difference in PCS trajectory through time.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients choosing home dialysis had improved MCS over time compared to those not selecting home dialysis. More work is needed to determine how differences in processes of care and/or unmeasured patient characteristics modulate this association.

Frailty in hemodialysis patients: results of a screening program and multidisciplinary interventions

Background

The number of frail patients of advanced age with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) undergoing hemodialysis is increasing globally. Here we evaluated a frailty screening program of ESKD patients starting hemodialysis, and subsequent multidisciplinary interventions.

Methods

This was a prospective observational study of ESKD patients in a hemodialysis program. Patients were evaluated for frailty (Fried frail phenotype) before and after a 12-month period. Patients followed standard clinical practice at our hospital, which included assessment and multidisciplinary interventions for nutritional (malnutrition-inflammation score, protein-energy wasting), physical [short physical performance battery (SPPB)] and psychological status.

Results

A total of 167 patients (mean ± standard deviation age 67.8 ± 15.4 years) were screened for frailty, and 108 completed the program. At screening, 27.9% of the patients were frail, 40.0% pre-frail and 32.1% non-frail. Nutritional interventions (enrichment, oral nutritional supplements, intradialytic parenteral nutrition) resulted in stable nutritional status for most frail and pre-frail patients after 12 months. Patients following recommendations for intradialytic, home-based or combined physical exercise presented improved or stable in SPPB scores after 12 months, compared with those that did not follow recommendations, especially in the frail and pre-frail population (P = .025). A rate of 0.05 falls/patient/year was observed. More than 60% of frail patients presented high scores of sadness and anxiety.

Conclusions

Frailty screening, together with coordinated interventions by nutritionists, physiotherapists, psychologists and nurses, preserved the health status of ESKD patients starting hemodialysis. Frailty assessment helped in advising patients on individual nutritional, physical or psychological needs.

Use of frailty assessment instruments in nephrology populations: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Frailty is a clinical syndrome of accelerated aging associated with adverse outcomes. Frailty is prevalent among patients with chronic kidney disease but is infrequently assessed in clinical settings, due to lack of consensus regarding frailty definitions and diagnostic tools. This study aimed to review the practice of frailty assessment in nephrology populations and evaluate the context and timing of frailty assessment.

METHODS

The search included published reports of frailty assessment in patients with chronic kidney disease, undergoing dialysis or in receipt of a kidney transplant, published between January 2000 and November 2021. Medline, CINAHL, Embase, PsychINFO, PubMed and Cochrane Library databases were examined. A total of 164 articles were included for review.

RESULTS

We found that studies were most frequently set within developed nations. Overall, 161 studies were frailty assessments conducted as part of an observational study design, and 3 within an interventional study. Studies favoured assessment of participants with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and transplant candidates. A total of 40 different frailty metrics were used. The most frequently utilised tool was the Fried frailty phenotype. Frailty prevalence varied across populations and research settings from 2.8% among participants with CKD to 82% among patients undergoing haemodialysis. Studies of frailty in conservatively managed populations were infrequent (N = 4). We verified that frailty predicts higher rates of adverse patient outcomes. There is sufficient literature to justify future meta-analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

There is increasing recognition of frailty in nephrology populations and the value of assessment in informing prognostication and decision-making during transitions in care. The Fried frailty phenotype is the most frequently utilised assessment, reflecting the feasibility of incorporating objective measures of frailty and vulnerability into nephrology clinical assessment. Further research examining frailty in low and middle income countries as well as first nations people is required. Future work should focus on interventional strategies exploring frailty rehabilitation.

Frailty assessment as part of transplant listing: yes, no or maybe?

Frailty, characterized by a decreased physiological reserve and an increased vulnerability to stressors, is common among kidney transplant (KT) candidates and recipients. In this review, we present and summarize the key arguments for and against the assessment of frailty as part of KT evaluation. The key arguments for including frailty were: (i) sheer prevalence and far-reaching consequences of frailty on KT, and (ii) the ability to conduct a more holistic and objective evaluation of candidates, removing the inaccuracy associated with 'eye-ball' assessments of transplant fitness. The key argument against were: (i) lack of agreement on the definition of frailty and which tools should be used in renal populations, (ii) a lack of clarity on how, by whom and how often frailty assessments should be performed, and (iii) a poor understanding of how acute stressors affect frailty. However, it is the overwhelming opinion that the time has come for frailty assessments to be incorporated into KT listing. Although ongoing areas of uncertainty exist and further evidence development is needed, the well-established impact of frailty on clinical and experiential outcomes, the invaluable information obtained from frailty assessments, and the potential for intervention outweigh these limitations. Proactive and early identification of frailty allows for individualized and improved risk assessment, communication and optimization of candidates.

What does the French REIN registry tell us about Stage 4-5 CKD care in older adults?

The aim of this paper is to illustrate all the clinical epidemiology searches made within the French network REIN to improve CKD stage 4-5 care in older adults. We summarize various studies describing clinical practice, care organization, prognosis and health economics evaluation in order to develop personalized care plans and decision-making tools. In France, for 20 years now, various databases have been mobilized including the national REIN registry which includes all patients receiving dialysis or transplantation. REIN data are indirectly linked to the French administrative healthcare database. They are also pooled with data from the PSPA cohort, a multicenter prospective cohort study of patients aged 75 or over with advanced CKD, monitored for 5 years, and the CKD-REIN clinical-based prospective cohort which included 3033 patients with CKD stage 3-4 from 2013 to 2016. During our various research work, we identified heterogeneous trajectories specific to this growing older population, raising ethical, organizational and economic issues. Renal registries will help clinicians, health providers and policy-makers if suitable decision- making tools are developed and validated.

Domains for a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment of Older Adults with Chronic Kidney Disease: Results from the CRIC Study

INTRODUCTION

A comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) tailored to the chronic kidney disease (CKD) population would yield a more targeted approach to assessment and care. We aimed to identify domains of a CKD-specific CGA (CKD-CGA), characterize patterns of these domains, and evaluate their predictive utility on adverse health outcomes.

METHODS

We used data from 864 participants in the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort aged ≥55 years and not on dialysis. Constituents of the CKD-CGA were selected a priori. Latent class analysis informed the selection of domains and identified classes of participants based on their domain patterns. The predictive utility of class membership on mortality, dialysis initiation, and hospitalization was examined. Model discrimination was assessed with C-statistics.

RESULTS

The CKD-CGA included 16 domains: cardiovascular disease, diabetes, five frailty phenotype components, depressive symptoms, cognition, five kidney disease quality-of-life components, health literacy, and medication use. A two-class latent class model fit the data best, with 34.7% and 65.3% in the high- and low-burden of geriatric conditions classes, respectively. Relative to the low-burden class, participants in the high-burden class were at increased risk of mortality (aHR = 2.09; 95% CI: 1.56, 2.78), dialysis initiation (aHR = 1.63; 95% CI: 1.06, 2.52), and hospitalization (aOR = 2.00; 95% CI: 1.38, 2.88). Model discrimination was the strongest for dialysis initiation (C-statistics = 0.86) and moderate for mortality and hospitalization (C-statistics = 0.70 and 0.66, respectively).

CONCLUSION

With further validation in an external cohort, the CKD-CGA has the potential to be used in nephrology practices for assessing and managing geriatric conditions in older adults with CKD.

Outcomes and care priorities for older people living with frailty and advanced chronic kidney disease: a multi-professional scoping review

The growing older population with advanced chronic kidney disease (ACKD stages 4-5) poses a challenge for healthcare worldwide. The high prevalence of frailty and associated adverse health outcomes highlights concerns for management and interventions specific to this population. The aim was to objectively review the evidence relating to older people (≥65 years) living with frailty and ACKD. More specifically how frailty is identified, what interventions have been studied and what outcomes have been reported including outcomes important to patients, families and carers. A scoping review was undertaken following the PRISMA-Scr guidelines. Nine databases were searched and a review team of five people followed a process using defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were then analysed to answer the specific questions of the review. The World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health was used to map outcomes across the domains. A total of 90 studies were included. The most reported frailty measure was the frailty phenotype. The most reported outcomes were mortality, hospitalisation and healthcare utilisation. Health-related quality of life was the most common patient-reported outcome measure. There were few intervention studies and limited evidence of patient and carer perspectives. This scoping review highlights important areas for further research in older people living with frailty and ACKD. This includes a 'gold standard' measure for identifying frailty, interventions and improvements in outcome measures that matter to patients (including studies that focus on carers and carer burden) and priority setting for future research.

Living with frailty and haemodialysis: a qualitative study

Background

Frailty is highly prevalent in people receiving haemodialysis (HD) and is associated with poor outcomes. Understanding the lived experiences of this group is essential to inform holistic care delivery.

Methods

Semi-structured interviews with N = 25 prevalent adults receiving HD from 3 HD units in the UK. Eligibility criteria included a Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) score of 4–7 and a history of at least one fall in the last 6 months. Sampling began guided by maximum variation sampling to ensure diversity in frailty status; subsequently theoretical sampling enabled exploration of preliminary themes. Analysis was informed by constructivist grounded theory; later we drew upon the socioecological model.

Results

Participants had a mean age of 69 ± 10 years, 13 were female, and 13 were White British. 14 participants were vulnerable or mildly frail (CFS 4–5), and 11 moderately or severely frail (CFS 6–7). Participants characterised frailty as weight loss, weakness, exhaustion, pain and sleep disturbance arising from multiple long-term conditions. Participants’ accounts revealed: the consequences of frailty (variable function and psychological ill-health at the individual level; increasing reliance upon family at the interpersonal level; burdensome health and social care interactions at the organisational level; reduced participation at the community level; challenges with financial support at the societal level); coping strategies (avoidance, vigilance, and resignation); and unmet needs (overprotection from family and healthcare professionals, transactional health and social care exchanges).

Conclusions

The implementation of a holistic needs assessment, person-centred health and social care systems, greater family support and enhancing opportunities for community participation may all improve outcomes and experience. An approach which encompasses all these strategies, together with wider public health interventions, may have a greater sustained impact.

Trial registration

ISRCTN12840463.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12882-022-02857-w.

Frailty, multimorbidity and sarcopaenia in haemodialysis patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

It is well recognised that haemodialysis patients have higher levels of multimorbidity, frailty and sarcopaenia. This review examines the current understanding of the three concepts in relation to the general population and haemodialysis patients, and the methods used to quantify them. It also looks at the interaction between multimorbidity, frailty and sarcopaenia in this patient group and proposes a new model that utilises muscle mass index and fat mass index as a surrogate representation of the three concepts.

RECENT FINDINGS

Multimorbidity in on the rise in the general population and this is one of the contributing factors to higher rates of chronic kidney disease, progression to end-stage renal disease and multimorbidity in haemodialysis patients. Malnutrition and haemodialysis induced end organ damage further contributes to muscle loss and frailty in this patient group. There is a significant overlap and interaction between multimorbidity, frailty and sarcopaenia in haemodialysis and their presence carries a significant impact on quality of life and survival. There are multiple scores for measuring multimorbidity, frailty and sarcopenia and there is no consensus on their utilisation in haemodialysis patients. We propose the use of fat mass index and muscle mass index model as a surrogate method for clinically quantifying multimorbidity, frailty and sarcopaenia.

SUMMARY

Effective public health policies are likely to have an impact on reducing the prevalence of multimorbidity and the development of end stage renal disease. Future research is required to develop interventions that are targeted at maintaining muscle mass and function in haemodialysis patients.

The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) employment in the frailty assessment of patients suffering from Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs): A systematic review

Background

The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is a well-established tool that has been widely employed to assess patients' frailty status and to predict clinical outcomes in the acute phase of a disease, but more information is needed to define the implications that this tool have when dealing with Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs).

Methods

An electronic literature search was performed on PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, and EBSCO databases to identify studies employing the CFS to assess frailty in patients with NCDs.

Findings

After database searching, article suitability evaluation, and studies' quality assessment, 43 studies were included in the systematic review. Researches were conducted mostly in Japan (37.5%), and half of the studies were focused on cardiovascular diseases (46.42%), followed by cancer (25.00%), and diabetes (10.71%). Simplicity (39.29%), efficacy (37.5%), and rapidity (16.07%) were the CFS characteristics mostly appreciated by the authors of the studies. The CFS-related results indicated that its scores were associated with patients' clinical outcomes (33.92%), with the presence of the disease (12.5%) and, with clinical decision making (10.71%). Furthermore, CFS resulted as a predictor of life expectancy in 23 studies (41.07%), clinical outcomes in 12 studies (21.43%), and hospital admissions/readmissions in 6 studies (10.71%).

Discussion

CFS was found to be a well-established and useful tool to assess frailty in NCDs, too. It resulted to be related to the most important disease-related clinical characteristics and, thus, it should be always considered as an important step in the multidisciplinary evaluation of frail and chronic patients.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.asp? PROSPERO 2021, ID: CRD42021224214.

Kidney Function and Risk of Physical and Cognitive Impairment in Older Persons with Type 2 Diabetes at an Outpatient Clinic with Geriatric Assessment Implementation

PURPOSE

Diabetes is associated with an increased risk of cognitive and physical functional decline that may impede disease self-management. By incorporating cognitive and physical function assessment, this study aimed to evaluate prevalence and factors associated with cognitive and physical dysfunction in older diabetic people.

METHODS

The cross-sectional study was performed from August 1, 2017 to November 30, 2018. The patients aged 65 years or older with type 2 diabetes mellitus were enrolled and the disease was routinely evaluated by blood hemoglobin A1c (A1C), blood pressure, lipids, and kidney function measured by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urinary albumin-creatinine rate (UACR). Besides, cognitive dysfunction through Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE), and functional disabilities by Activities of Daily Living (ADL) questionnaire were assessed simultaneously.

RESULTS

Among 863 patients (48.3% men) with a median age of 72.0 years (interquartile range or IQR: 67.0-78.0 years), 159 (18.5%) had cognitive impairment assessed by MMSE, while 40 (4.6%) experienced at least one problem in ADL. With different A1C stratifications, it was shown that both MMSE and ADL scores were associated with glycemic control. Patients with impaired MMSE and ADL scores were older, had lower eGFR, lower blood pressure, and higher UACR levels. After adjustment of possible confounders, it was shown that age and eGFR predicted MMSE and ADL score impairment.

CONCLUSION

By incorporating physical and cognitive function screening program into routine care at a diabetes outpatient clinic, our study found that both cognitive and physical function impairment were common in older diabetic patients, and their relevant factors, including older age, and lower eGFR. It was recommended that in older individuals with diabetes, particularly those with risk factors, an additional assessment of cognitive and physical functions can be integrated into routine clinical process to provide more comprehensive management plans.

Application of the Clinical Frailty Score and body composition and upper arm strength in haemodialysis patients

Background

To improve outcomes, simple screening tests are required to detect patients at increased risk of mortality. As patients with muscle weakness and wasting are at increased risk of death, we wished to review the use of the Clinical Frailty Score (CFS).

Patients and methods

Dialysis staff graded haemodialysis (HD) patients attending for routine outpatient sessions using the CFS, a functional scoring scale, for patients who require help with their instrumental activities of daily living, classified as clinically frail with scores >4, which were compared with contemporaneous Stoke–Davies comorbidity scores, post-HD body composition measured by bioimpedance, hand grip strength (HGS) and standard laboratory investigations.

Results

The results from 2089 patients (60.2% male) were reviewed, with 890 (42.6%) classified as frail. Frail patients were older [mean ± standard deviation (SD) 71.5 ± 15.6 versus 59.1 ± 15.6 years) and female (50.7% versus 37.3%) and had greater comorbidity {median 2 [interquartile range (IQR) 1–3] versus 1 [0–2]}, body mass index (BMI) (26.0 ± 6.7 versus 25.5 ± 5.4 kg/m²),  C-reactive protein (CRP) [8 (IQR 3–20) versus 5 (2–11) mg/L], lower serum albumin (37.6 ± 4.7 versus 40.1 ± 4.7 g/L),  lean BMI (8.9 ± 1.7 versus 9.7 ± 1.6 kg/m²) and HGS [13.4 (IQR 9.6–18.8) versus 20.9 (14.5–29) kg] (all P < 0.001). Frailty was independently associated in a multivariable logistic model with age {odds ratio [OR] 2.33 [95% confidence limit (CL) 2.01–2.7]}, body fat mass [OR 1.02 (CL 1.01–1.03)], log CRP [OR 1.63 (CL 1.28–2.07)] (all P < 0.001) and comorbidity [OR 1.45 (CL 1.17–1.8); P = 0.001] and negatively associated with albumin [OR 0.95 (CL 0.92–0.98) and HGS [OR 0.91 (CL 0.9–0.93)] (both P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Frail patients are at increased risk of mortality and, as such, simple reliable screening tools are required to rapidly detect patients at risk. The CFS is a useful screening tool that can be readily performed by dialysis staff to identify frail patients. Frailty in HD patients was associated with increasing age, comorbidity, fat weight and inflammation and reduced muscle strength and muscle mass. There is an overlap between frailty and both sarcopenia and protein energy wasting, which requires additional assessments, potentially including body composition, strength, dietary assessments and laboratory investigations. In addition, as the CFS offers a scale, patient trajectories can potentially be serially monitored over time, thus allowing patient-specific interventions or holistic care plans.

The opinions and experiences of nurses on frailty screening among older hospitalized patients. An exploratory study

Background

Routine screening for frailty at admission by nurses may be useful to detect geriatric risks and problems at an early stage. However, the added value of this screening is not clear yet. Information about the opinions and attitudes of nurses towards this screening is also lacking. As they have a crucial role in conducting this screening, an exploratory study was performed to examine hospital nurses’ opinions and perspectives about this screening and how it influences their daily work.

Methods

A qualitative, exploratory approach was employed, using semi-structured interviews with 13 nurses working on different general medical wards (surgical and internal medicine) in three Dutch hospitals. Frailty screening had been implemented for several years in these hospitals.

Results

The participating nurses reported that frailty screening can be useful to structure their work, create more awareness of frail older patients and as starting point for pro-active nursing care. At the same time, they assess their clinical view as more important than the results of a standard screening tool. The nurses hardly used the overall screening scores, but were particularly interested in information regarding specific items, such as delirium or fall risk. Screening results are partly embedded systematically and in daily nursing care, e.g., in team briefings or during transfer of patients to other wards. The majority of the nurses had received little training about the background of frailty screening and the use of screening tools.

Conclusions

Most nurses stated that frailty screening tools are helpful in daily practice. However, nurses did not use the frailty screening tools in the referred way; tools were particularly used to evaluate patients on separate items of the tool instead of the summative score of the tool. When frailty screening tools are implemented in daily practice, training needs to be focused on. Additional research in this field is necessary to gain more insight into nurses’ opinions on frailty screening.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-021-02586-z.

Design of a consensus-based geriatric assessment tailored for older chronic kidney disease patients: results of a pragmatic approach

Aim

To propose a consensus-based geriatric assessment for optimizing both routine care and research in older patients with advanced chronic kidney disease.

Findings

Using a pragmatic approach, we reached consensus on a suitable nephrology-tailored geriatric assessment to routinely identify major geriatric impairments in older patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. This geriatric assessment contains instruments in functional, cognitive, psychological, somatic, patient preferences, nutritional status, and social domains, and can be administered with patient questionnaires and professional-administered instruments by nurse (practitioners) in approximately 20 and 40 minutes, respectively.

Message

We propose a consensus test set for standardized nephrology-tailored geriatric assessment, which is currently being implemented in multiple hospitals and studies, to benefit clinical care for older patients with advanced chronic kidney disease and enhance research comparability.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41999-021-00498-0.

Purpose

Unidentified cognitive decline and other geriatric impairments are prevalent in older patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). Despite guideline recommendation of geriatric evaluation, routine geriatric assessment is not common in these patients. While high burden of vascular disease and existing pre-dialysis care pathways mandate a tailored geriatric assessment, no consensus exists on which instruments are most suitable in this population to identify geriatric impairments. Therefore, the aim of this study was to propose a geriatric assessment, based on multidisciplinary consensus, to routinely identify major geriatric impairments in older people with advanced CKD.

Methods

A pragmatic approach was chosen, which included focus groups, literature review, inventory of current practices, an expert consensus meeting, and pilot testing. In preparation of the consensus meeting, we composed a project team and an expert panel (n = 33), drafted selection criteria for the selection of instruments, and assessed potential instruments for the geriatric assessment.

Results

Selection criteria related to general geriatric domains, clinical relevance, feasibility, and duration of the assessment. The consensus-assessment contains instruments in functional, cognitive, psychological, somatic, patient preferences, nutritional status, and social domains. Administration of (seven) patient questionnaires and (ten) professional-administered instruments, by nurse (practitioners), takes estimated 20 and 40 min, respectively. Results are discussed in a multidisciplinary meeting including at least nephrology and geriatric expertise, informing nephrology treatment decisions, and follow-up interventions among which comprehensive geriatric assessment.

Conclusion

This first multidisciplinary consensus on nephrology-tailored geriatric assessment intent to benefit clinical care and enhance research comparability for older patients with advanced CKD.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41999-021-00498-0.

Quality indicators for cardiac rehabilitation after myocardial infarction in China: a consensus panel and practice test

OBJECTIVES

Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) improves outcomes after myocardial infarction (MI), but it is underused in China. The purpose of this study was to develop a set of quality indicators (QIs) to improve clinical practices and to confirm the measurability and performance of the developed QIs for CR in Chinese patients after MI.

DESIGN AND SETTING

The QIs were developed by a Chinese expert consensus panel during in-person meetings. The five QIs most in need of improvement were selected using a national questionnaire. Finally, the completion rate and feasibility of the QIs were verified in a group of MI survivors at university hospitals in China.

PARTICIPANTS

Seventeen professionals participated in the consensus panel, 89 personnel in the field of CR participated in the national questionnaire and 165 MI survivors participated in the practice test.

RESULTS

A review of 17 eligible articles generated 26 potential QIs, among which 17 were selected by the consensus panel after careful evaluation. The 17 QIs were divided into two domains: (1) improving participation and adherence and (2) CR process standardisation. Nationwide telephone and WeChat surveys identified the five QIs most in need of improvement. A multicenter practice test (n=165) revealed that the mean performance value of the proposed QIs was 43.9% (9.9%-86.1%) according to patients with post-MI.

CONCLUSIONS

The consensus panel identified a comprehensive set of QIs for CR in patients with post-MI. A nationwide questionnaire survey was used to identify the QIs that need immediate attention to improve the quality of CR. Although practice tests confirmed the measurability of the proposed QIs in clinical practice, the implementation of the QIs needs to be improved.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

This study is part of a study registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03528382).