Can antibacterial therapy be discontinued in persistently febrile granulocytopenic cancer patients?

Absolute Monocyte Count as Early and Safe Marker for Antibiotic Cessation in Febrile Neutropenia Without Etiology in Pediatric Oncology Patients

BACKGROUND

There is no practice standard regarding antibiotic duration in children with cancer and unexplained febrile neutropenia (FN). We hypothesized that absolute monocyte count (AMC) and absolute phagocyte count (APC= ANC + AMC + bands) are more sensitive, earlier, and safe markers of antibiotic cessation compared with absolute neutrophil count (ANC).

METHODS

A retrospective review of FN episodes (FNEs) in pediatric oncology patients was conducted between 2009 and 2016. Included patients were afebrile for 24 hours and without an identified infectious source at antibiotic cessation. Primary endpoints, including recurrent fever, readmission, bloodstream infection, microbiologically documented infection, and adverse outcomes, were assessed 10 days after antibiotic cessation and compared among different bone marrow recovery parameters (ANC, AMC, APC). Secondary endpoints included length of FN stay, antibiotic-free days, and cost.

RESULTS

Three hundred ninety-one FNEs in 235 patients were included. Three groups were compared based on ANC (cells/μL) at the time of antibiotic cessation: < 200 in 102 (26%), 200 to 500 in 111 (28%), and >500 in 178 (46%). No statistically significant differences in primary endpoints were identified among the 3 ANC groups; however, a trend toward unfavorable outcomes in the ANC ≤200 cells/μL group compared with the ANC >200 cells/μL was observed. Primary endpoints based on AMC >100 cells/μL at the time of antibiotic cessation showed statistically significant favorable outcomes compared AMC ≤100 cells/μL (80%, 88%, 90%, 89%, and 93% risk reduction in recurrent fever, readmission, new bloodstream infection, new microbiologically documented infection, and adverse events, respectively). Similar favorable results were seen when APC >300 cells/μL was used as a threshold for antibiotic cessation. The median length of stay for FN if discharged when AMC >100 cells/μL was 3 days shorter and associated with fewer unfavorable outcomes, thus resulting in fewer hospital days, fewer antibiotic days, and decreased cost.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that AMC >100 cells/μL (regardless of ANC) or APC >300 cells/μL may be safe thresholds for empiric antibiotic cessation and result in reduced unfavorable clinical outcomes within 10 days postdischarge, reduced antibiotic days of therapy and reduced health care costs. Further prospective studies are needed to validate AMC as an accurate surrogate marker for antibiotic cessation in FNEs in children with cancer.

Discontinuation of antimicrobial therapy in adult neutropenic haematology patients: A prospective cohort

OBJECTIVES

Antibiotics for febrile neutropenia (FN) in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) patients undergoing intensive chemotherapy are usually maintained until neutropenia resolution, because of the risk of uncontrolled sepsis in this vulnerable population. This leads to unnecessarily prolonged antimicrobial therapy.

METHODS

Based on ECIL-4 recommendations, we modified our management strategy and discontinued antibiotics after a pre-established duration in patients treated for a first episode of FN between August 2014 and October 2017.

RESULTS

Antibiotics were stopped during 62 FN episodes, and maintained in the control group (n = 13). Median age of patients was 54 years. A total of 39 (63%) patients received induction and 23 (37%) consolidation chemotherapy; 36 (58%) patients had fever of unknown origin. Median neutropenia length was 26 days (IQR 24-30). Antibiotics were started at day 9 (IQR 5-13). Most patients received piperacillin-tazobactam (56%) or cefepime (32%). Antimicrobial therapy was longer in the control group than in the policy compliant group, 10 (IQR 7-16) vs. 19 days (IQR 15-23), P = 0.0001. After antibiotics discontinuation, 20% patients experienced fever recurrence, within 5.5 days (IQR 3-7.5). None of these febrile episodes were severe and 80% patients remained afebrile, with neutrophil recovery occurring within 5 days (IQR 2-8.5). Overall, 287 antibiotics days were spared; this represents 49% of all days with antibiotics. No patient had died at day 30 from intervention; six died during late follow-up, two from graft-versus-host disease and four from relapsed or refractory leukaemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Discontinuing antibiotics in neutropenic AML patients treated for a first episode of FN is safe, and results in significant antibiotic sparing.

Guideline for the Management of Fever and Neutropenia in Children With Cancer and Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation Recipients: 2017 Update

Purpose To update a clinical practice guideline (CPG) for the empirical management of fever and neutropenia (FN) in children with cancer and hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation recipients. Methods The International Pediatric Fever and Neutropenia Guideline Panel is a multidisciplinary and multinational group of experts in pediatric oncology and infectious diseases that includes a patient advocate. For questions of risk stratification and evaluation, we updated systematic reviews of observational studies. For questions of therapy, we conducted a systematic review of randomized trials of any intervention applied for the empirical management of pediatric FN. The Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach was used to make strong or weak recommendations and to classify levels of evidence as high, moderate, low, or very low. Results Recommendations related to initial presentation, ongoing management, and empirical antifungal therapy of pediatric FN were reviewed; the most substantial changes were related to empirical antifungal therapy. Key differences from our 2012 FN CPG included the listing of a fourth-generation cephalosporin for empirical therapy in high-risk FN, refinement of risk stratification to define patients with high-risk invasive fungal disease (IFD), changes in recommended biomarkers and radiologic investigations for the evaluation of IFD in prolonged FN, and a weak recommendation to withhold empirical antifungal therapy in IFD low-risk patients with prolonged FN. Conclusion Changes to the updated FN CPG recommendations will likely influence the care of pediatric patients with cancer and those undergoing hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. Future work should focus on closing research gaps and on identifying ways to facilitate implementation and adaptation.

Proposal for shorter antibiotic therapies

OBJECTIVES

Reducing antibiotic consumption has now become a major public health priority. Reducing treatment duration is one of the means to achieve this objective. Guidelines on the therapeutic management of the most frequent infections recommend ranges of treatment duration in the ratio of one to two. The Recommendation Group of the French Infectious Diseases Society (SPILF) was asked to collect literature data to then recommend the shortest treatment durations possible for various infections.

METHODS

Analysis of the literature focused on guidelines published in French and English, supported by a systematic search on PubMed. Articles dating from one year before the guidelines publication to August 31, 2015 were searched on the website.

RESULTS

The shortest treatment durations based on the relevant clinical data were suggested for upper and lower respiratory tract infections, central venous catheter-related and uncomplicated primary bacteremia, infective endocarditis, bacterial meningitis, intra-abdominal, urinary tract, upper reproductive tract, bone and joint, skin and soft tissue infections, and febrile neutropenia. Details of analyzed articles were shown in tables.

CONCLUSION

This work stresses the need for new well-conducted studies evaluating treatment durations for some common infections. Following the above-mentioned work focusing on existing literature data, the Recommendation Group of the SPILF suggests specific study proposals.

European guidelines for empirical antibacterial therapy for febrile neutropenic patients in the era of growing resistance: summary of the 2011 4th European Conference on Infections in Leukemia

Owing to increasing resistance and the limited arsenal of new antibiotics, especially against Gram-negative pathogens, carefully designed antibiotic regimens are obligatory for febrile neutropenic patients, along with effective infection control. The Expert Group of the 4(th) European Conference on Infections in Leukemia has developed guidelines for initial empirical therapy in febrile neutropenic patients, based on: i) the local resistance epidemiology; and ii) the patient's risk factors for resistant bacteria and for a complicated clinical course. An 'escalation' approach, avoiding empirical carbapenems and combinations, should be employed in patients without particular risk factors. A 'de-escalation' approach, with initial broad-spectrum antibiotics or combinations, should be used only in those patients with: i) known prior colonization or infection with resistant pathogens; or ii) complicated presentation; or iii) in centers where resistant pathogens are prevalent at the onset of febrile neutropenia. In the latter case, infection control and antibiotic stewardship also need urgent review. Modification of the initial regimen at 72-96 h should be based on the patient's clinical course and the microbiological results. Discontinuation of antibiotics after 72 h or later should be considered in neutropenic patients with fever of unknown origin who are hemodynamically stable since presentation and afebrile for at least 48 h, irrespective of neutrophil count and expected duration of neutropenia. This strategy aims to minimize the collateral damage associated with antibiotic overuse, and the further selection of resistance.

Guideline for the management of fever and neutropenia in children with cancer and/or undergoing hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation

PURPOSE

To develop an evidence-based guideline for the empiric management of pediatric fever and neutropenia (FN).

METHODS

The International Pediatric Fever and Neutropenia Guideline Panel is a multidisciplinary and multinational group composed of experts in pediatric oncology and infectious disease as well as a patient advocate. The Panel was convened for the purpose of creating this guideline. We followed previously validated procedures for creating evidence-based guidelines. Working groups focused on initial presentation, ongoing management, and empiric antifungal therapy. Each working group developed key clinical questions, conducted systematic reviews of the published literature, and compiled evidence summaries. The Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach was used to generate summaries, and evidence was classified as high, moderate, low, or very low based on methodologic considerations.

RESULTS

Recommendations were made related to initial presentation (risk stratification, initial evaluation, and treatment), ongoing management (modification and cessation of empiric antibiotics), and empiric antifungal treatment (risk stratification, evaluation, and treatment) of pediatric FN. For each recommendation, the strength of the recommendation and level of evidence are presented.

CONCLUSION

This guideline represents an evidence-based approach to FN specific to children with cancer. Although some recommendations are similar to adult-based guidelines, there are key distinctions in multiple areas. Implementation will require adaptation to the local context.

[Febrile neutropenia in adult patients with solid tumours: a review of literature toward a rational and optimal management]

Chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia represents a frequent emergency and evidence based management of this event remains an exigency for each patient. Appropriate use of antibiotics is mandatory, growth factors have to be proposed according to validated guidelines and benefits and risks of antiobioprophylaxy must be discussed. This review propose to summarize available data on these important questions, with a special focus on this management of febrile neutropenia in daily practice.

Three-day treatment with imipenem for unexplained fever during prolonged neutropaenia in haematology patients receiving fluoroquinolone and fluconazole prophylaxis: a prospective observational safety study

BACKGROUND

Guidelines advocate >7d of broad-spectrum antibiotics for unexplained fever (UF) during neutropaenia. However, effective antimicrobial prophylaxis reduces the incidence of gram-negative infections, which may allow shorter treatment. This study evaluates the safety of discontinuing empirical broad-spectrum antibiotics if no microbial source is documented after an initial work-up of 72 h.

METHODS

Prospective observational study at a tertiary-care haematology-unit in patients suffering from haematologic malignancies and treatment-induced prolonged neutropaenia of 10d. Oral fluoroquinolone and fluconazole prophylaxis was given from day 1. Fever was empirically treated with imipenem which was discontinued after 72 h if, following a standardised protocol, no infectious aetiology was documented. Duration of fever, antimicrobial therapy and overall mortality were registered.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty six patients were evaluated during 276 neutropaenic episodes. One hundred and thirty six patients (82.5%) experienced 1 febrile episode. A total of 317 febrile episodes were observed, of which 177 (56%) were diagnosed as UF. In 135 febrile episodes (43%), a probable/definite infectious origin was documented. Mean duration of fever in neutropaenic periods with 1 febrile episode was 5d, and mean time of treatment with imipenem was 4.7d. In patients without documented infection, mean time of imipenem treatment was only 3.7d. Overall mortality 30 d after neutrophil recovery was 3.6% (6/166); no patient died from untreated bacterial infection.

CONCLUSION

Discontinuation of broad-spectrum antibiotics during neutropaenia in haematology patients on fluoroquinolone and fluconazole prophylaxis is safe, provided that no infectious aetiology is established after 72 h.

Acute Myelogenous Leukemia and Febrile Neutropenia

Aggressive chemotherapy has a deleterious effect on all components of the defense system of the human body. The resulting neutropenia as well as injury to the pulmonary and gastrointestinal mucosa allow pathogenic micro-organisms easy access to the body. The symptoms of an incipient infection are usually subtle and limited to unexplained fever due to the absence of granulocytes. This is the reason why prompt administration of antimicrobial agents while waiting for the results of the blood cultures, the so-called empirical approach, became an undisputed standard of care. Gram-negative pathogens remain the principal concern because their virulence accounts for serious morbidity and a high early mortality rate. Three basic intravenous antibiotic regimens have evolved: initial therapy with a single antipseudomonal β-lactam, the so-called monotherapy; a combination of two drugs: a β-lactam with an aminoglycoside, a second β-lactam or a quinolone; and, thirdly, a glycopeptide in addition to β-lactam monotherapy or combination. As there is no single consistently superior empirical regimen, one should consider the local antibiotic susceptibility of bacterial isolates in the selection of the initial antibiotic regimen. Not all febrile neutropenic patients carry the same risk as those with fever only generally respond rapidly, whereas those with a clinically or microbiologically documented infection show a much slower reaction and less favorable response rate.

Once an empirical antibiotic therapy has been started, the patient must be monitored continuously for nonresponse, emergence of secondary infections, adverse effects, and the development of drug-resistant organisms. The averageduration of fever in serious infections in eventually successfully treated neutropenic patients is 4–5 days. Adaptations of an antibiotic regimen in a patient who is clearly not responding is relatively straightforward when a micro-organism has been isolated; the results of the cultures, supplemented by susceptibility testing, will assist in selecting the proper antibiotics. The management of febrile patients with pulmonary infiltrates is complex. Bronchoscopy and a high resolution computer-assisted tomographic scan represent the cornerstones of all diagnostic procedures, supplemented by serological tests for relevant viral pathogens and for aspergillosis. Fungi have been found to be responsible for two thirds of all superinfections that may surface during broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment of neutropenic patients. Antibiotic treatment is usually continued for a minimum of 7 days or until culture results indicate that the causative organism has been eradicated and the patient is free of major signs and symptoms. If a persistently neutropenic patient has no complaints and displays no evidence of infection, early watchful cessation of antibiotic therapy or a change to the oral regimen should be considered.

Infectious Complications of Cancer Therapy

Advances in the management of cancer, particularly the development of new chemotherapeutic agents, have greatly improved the survival and outcome of patients with hematologic malignancies and solid tumors; overall 5-year survival rates in cancer patients have improved from 39% in the 1960s to 60% in the 1990s.1 However, infection, caused by both the underlying malignancy and cancer chemotherapy, particularly myelosuppressive chemotherapy, remains a persistent challenge.

Economic Issues: Toward a Cost‐Effective Approach to the Management of Febrile Neutropenia in Japan

The cost of treating neutropenic patients unexplained fever is of significant concern in Japan because of the depressed economy and the aging population. Development of a standardized treatment methodology specifically tailored to the situation in Japan will make the treatment more efficient for health care institutions, will allow for improved monitoring of practices and costs, and will result in better patient care. It is essential, however, that the welfare of the patients be the utmost priority--cost savings is not sufficient in the absence of a significant impact on morbidity and mortality.

Management of fever in neutropenic patients

Substantial progress has been made in the management of febrile episodes in neutropenic patients, largely by the prompt administration of potent, broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents. During the past several decades, the spectrum of organisms has changed from a predominance of gram-negative pathogens to a predominance of gram-positive pathogens. In recent years, some hospitals have experienced an increase of infections caused by multi-drug-resistant pathogens. Hence, it is no longer possible to rely on standardized regimens, but antimicrobial therapy must be selected based on the predominant pathogens and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns at each institution. It is customary to initiate antifungal therapy empirically in those patients whose fever persists despite broad-spectrum antibacterial therapy. Alternatives now exist to amphotericin B, including lipid formulations of this drug, and fluconazole. It is critically important that each patient be carefully re-assessed before starting antifungal therapy, because there are many other potential causes for persistent fever, including resistant bacteria and viruses. Novel approaches to therapy include outpatient antibiotics, and use of growth factors as adjunctive therapy. There also has been a renewed interest in white blood cell transfusions. Although the prognosis for infection in neutropenic patients has improved greatly, new infectious problems have emerged that limit our successful management of these complications.

An open, randomized, multicentre study comparing the use of low-dose ceftazidime or cefotaxime, both in combination with netilmicin, in febrile neutropenic patients. German Multicentre Study Group

To reduce drug acquisition costs, the clinical and bacteriological efficacy of low-dose ceftazidime i.v. (1 g tid) was compared with cefotaxime i.v. (2 g tid). Both regimens were combined with netilmicin i.v. (2 mg/kg bodyweight tid), in an open, randomized, multicentre trial in febrile neutropenic patients. The addition of antibiotics for gram-positive coverage was part of the protocol; alteration in the antibiotics for gram-negative cover or premature discontinuation of the study antibiotics were judged as failure. One hundred and eighty six patients were randomized by nine German centres, the patients matched for age, underlying diseases and duration of neutropenia (median duration 14 days) in both treatment arms. Infections were documented microbiologically in 29% of the patients, clinically in 16% and suspected (fever of unknown origin) in 102/186 patients (55%). The 82 pathogens isolated were predominantly gram-positive bacteria. In an intent-to-treat analysis, the overall response rate without modification at the final evaluation was 58% in the ceftazidime group and 34% in the cefotaxime group (P < 0.01). The success rates with modification were 84% and 64%, respectively. The failure rate in a highly immunosuppressed subgroup of the patients (bone marrow transplant recipients) was higher for cefotaxime (53%) than for the ceftazidime arm (14%) (P < 0.001). Response rates were significantly higher in the ceftazidime group for patients with microbiologically documented and possible infections. No major bacterial superinfections occurred in the low-dose treatment arm. The tolerability was good for both regimens. Low-dose ceftazidime combined with netilmicin proved to be superior to recommended doses of cefotaxime/netilmicin in febrile neutropenic patients.

Safety of early hospital discharge of selected febrile children and adolescents with cancer with prolonged neutropenia

PROBLEM

The safety of early hospital discharge (i.e., before the absolute neutrophil count [ANC] exceeds 500 cell/mm3) of febrile neutropenic children and adolescents with cancer who had experienced prolonged neutropenia (i.e., for more than 7 days) following admission has not been studied.

METHOD OF STUDY

Three hundred and thirty nine consecutive admissions of children and adolescents with cancer for management of febrile neutropenia were reviewed. Early discharge criteria included absence of fever for 24 hours prior to discharge, sterile blood cultures for 24 hours, evidence of bone marrow recovery defined as a sustained increase in platelet count and ANC or absolute phagocyte count (APC), and control of local infection if present. Children hospitalized with febrile neutropenia who remained neutropenic for more than 7 days were analyzed to assess their outcomes following discharge it they had met criteria for early hospital discharge.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients in whom neutropenia had persisted for more than 7 days were discharged before attaining an ANC greater than 500/mm3 when they met the early discharge criteria. Only two children (6%) required readmission for recurrent fever, a rate which was not different from that of patients discharged after a more transient episode of neutropenia (2 of 33 vs. 3 of 121, P = 0.3). Both patients who were readmitted had a source of local infection which worsened despite oral antibiotics. Both patients appeared clinically well at the time of readmission and had sterile cultures during their second hospitalization with resolution of local infection.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms that low-risk criteria used to select children with cancer for discharge before complete resolution of neutropenia can be safely applied to those patients whose neutropenia lasted more than 7 days following admission.

Infections in neutropenic patients. II: Management

Improvement in supportive care including the introduction of new antibiotics, antiviral and antifungal agents and haematopoietic growth factors have all contributed to a decreased chemotherapy-related mortality and morbidity in cancer patients. However, infection during neutropenia is still a major complication and a great concern for the clinician responsible for the patient. Management of infectious complications in the neutropenic patient is reviewed.

Fever in the compromised host

Fever in the compromised host remains a significant clinical problem. Multiple potential pathogens, subtle physical findings, and a variety of noninfectious problems that may masquerade as infection contribute to this clinical challenge. A review of host defense defects along with a careful physical examination will begin to narrow the etiologic possibilities for fever. Recognizing that the majority of infections will represent as fevers of unknown etiology, a consistent approach to the patient who responds to empiric antibiotic therapy as well as to the patient who fails to respond should be developed.

Current Approach to the Management of Neutropenia

Neutrophils have a critical role in host defense. Reduction in the absolute neutrophil count to below 1,000/μL is associated with increased susceptibility to infection. The pattern of infections depends on the severity and the duration of neutropenia and other associated defects in host defense mechanisms and exposure to antibiotics and other drugs, particularly corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents. Breaks in the integrity of the skin or the gastrointestinal mucosal surfaces serve as the portals of entry for the majority of infecting organisms. Empiric antibiotic therapy and hospitalization are almost always required for the management of fever (temperature >38.2°C) in a neutropenic patient. A single antibiotic (e.g., ceftazidime or imipenem) or a combination of antibiotics with activity against both gram-positive and gram-negative organisms usually provides effective antimicrobial therapy. In low-risk patients, trials of out-patient therapy are ongoing. When febrile neutropenia does not respond to empiric broad-spectrum antibacterial therapy, fungal infections, particularly Candida and Aspergillus, should be considered, and antifungal therapy should be initiated. Recently, availability of the hematopoietic growth factors, particularly G-CSF and GM-CSF, have changed the approach to prevention and treatment of neutropenia. Randomized controlled studies have established that these growth factors accelerate hematopoietic recovery following chemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation. By shortening the duration of neutropenia, many of the heretofore inevitable problems with fever and infection can be avoided. The only major factor limiting the use of these agents is their cost. Despite the use of these growth factors, some patients will still experience slow hematopoietic recovery. For these patients, use of neutrophil transfusions, possibly from G-CSF-stimulated normal donors, may prove to be a useful adjunctive therapy.

Prevention of gram-positive infections in patients treated with high-dose chemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation: a randomized controlled trial of vancomycin

Between January 1986 and June 1988, 155 patients (73 children and 82 adults), who were candidates for bone marrow transplantation, were included in a randomized controlled trial (75 patients in vancomycin group and 80 patients in the group without vancomycin) to evaluate the efficiency of a short course of vancomycin (10 mg/kg i.v. every 6 hours, day-5 to +1) in decreasing the incidence of Gram-positive infections during aplasia after high-dose chemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation. There was no statistical difference in the occurrence of documented septicemia, documented coccus Gram-positive infections, or fever of unknown origins during aplasia in the 2 groups. Thus, short prophylactic treatment with vancomycin proved inefficient in reducing morbidity due to infection after high-dose chemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation.

Safety and cost effectiveness of early hospital discharge of lower risk children with cancer admitted for fever and neutropenia

BACKGROUND

Standard treatment for fever during periods of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia includes hospitalization and administration of intravenous antibiotics until the patient is afebrile and no longer neutropenic. This study prospectively evaluates the safety and cost-effectiveness of early discharge of selected low risk children before recovery from neutropenia.

METHODS

We studied 74 children with cancer during 131 consecutive admissions for fever during a period of neutropenia. All patients initially were hospitalized and received broad-spectrum antibiotics. Intravenous antibiotic therapy was discontinued, and the patients promptly were discharged even if they had an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of less than 500 cells/mm3 as long as they were afebrile, appeared clinically well, had negative cultures, exhibited control of local infection, and showed hematologic evidence of bone marrow recovery.

RESULTS

Intravenous antibiotics were discontinued in 82 cases (63%) before recovery of the ANC to more than 500 cells/mm3, and 78 patients were discharged immediately. None of 70 patients discharged while neutropenic but exhibiting a rising ANC at the time of discharge developed recurrent fever and required readmission. Thirty of these children had an improving localized infection when intravenous antibiotics were discontinued and completed a course of oral antibiotics at home. The estimated mean savings in hospital charges due to early discharge was $5058 per patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Low risk children with cancer who are hospitalized and treated for fever and neutropenia but appear clinically well may have intravenous antibiotics discontinued and be discharged safely irrespective of the ANC, as long as their granulocyte count is rising. This approach shortens hospital stays and results in considerable cost savings.

Antiinfective prophylaxis with ceftazidime and teicoplanin in children undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation

Sixty children treated for solid tumors with high-dose chemotherapy followed by bone marrow transplantation were randomly assigned to one of two antibiotic protocols. Group A received prophylaxis consisting of ceftazidime plus teicoplanin beginning before the onset of aplasia and fever; group B received exactly the same antibiotic regimen but beginning at the onset of fever. The two groups were compared in terms of the rate of septicemia, fever of unknown origin, the time-lapse before the appearance of septicemia, the sensitivity of the causative organisms to the antibiotics, the effect of the latter on the intestinal flora, and the rate of fungal infections. The incidence of septicemia was significantly lower in group A (6.6%) than in group B (24.0%), mainly due to the prevention of episodes of early onset. Similarly, the appearance of the first episode of fever was delayed in group A, and the overall duration was reduced. Amphotericin B was prescribed empirically with the same rule in both groups, but three children in group A did not require amphotericin B. The effect on the intestinal flora was similar in the two groups; it must, however, be closely monitored so that the presence of potential pathogens can be dealt with appropriately.

Double beta-lactam regimen compared to an aminoglycoside/beta-lactam regimen as empiric antibiotic therapy for febrile granulocytopenic cancer patients

In a prospective, randomized trial, 205 febrile episodes in granulocytopenic cancer patients were treated with ceftazidime with or without tobramycin (C +/- T), both agents being administered only if the initial granulocyte count was below 200/microliters, or ceftazidime plus piperacillin (C + P). The overall response rate was 71% (39 of 60 for C +/- T and 45 of 58 for C + P). Logistic regression analyses documented no evidence of a significant difference between the two regimens in overall treatment effect after accounting for the linear effects of potentially important variables, such as infection type and granulocyte count. Although the response rates for the subgroup of patients with bacteremias was better with the C + P regimen (P = 0.06), there was no difference in response for patients with bacteremia and profound (< 100/microliters) sustained granulocytopenia. The double beta-lactam combination demonstrated in vitro synergism in 73%; antagonism was not seen. Both regimens produced excellent serum bactericidal levels (C +/- T geometric mean peak 1:170; C + P peak 1:137) against gram-negative but not gram-positive pathogens (1:4; 1:7 respectively) that had caused bacteremia. Emergence of resistance and significant coagulopathy and/or bleeding did not occur during therapy. Antibiotic-related nephrotoxicity was noted in 7 of 95 trials in the C + P and in 6 of 89 trials in the C +/- T group (P = 0.19). The incidence of secondary infections in patients with profound (< 100/microliters) sustained granulocytopenia was lower in the C +/- T group (P = 0.04). Alimentary canal anaerobic flora preservation with C +/- T, and suppression with C + P, was demonstrated.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Strategy for antibiotic therapy in febrile neutropenic patients on selective antibiotic decontamination

In a non-randomized prospective study the need for broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy was evaluated in selectively decontaminated neutropenic patients with fever. Fifty-two adult patients with a neutrophil count < 0.5 x 10(9)/l suffered 77 febrile episodes while receiving oral antibiotics for selective decontamination. Antibiotic treatment was only initiated if additional clinical signs or the microbiological culture results pointed to the likelihood of an infection. Treatment was either empirically based (broad-spectrum) or specific (narrow-spectrum). If a causative agent was identified, therapy was adjusted accordingly. If evidence of infection was lacking after 72-96 hours, the antibiotics were discontinued, and these patients were reexamined meticulously and repeatedly. For the 40 episodes without confirmed infection, the median duration of therapy was three days (range 0-13 days) and the survival rate 100%; for the 37 episodes with confirmed infection, the median duration of therapy was 12 days (range 1-49 days, p < 0.0001) and the survival rate 85%. After adjustment of therapy the final regimen was broad-spectrum in only 18% of treated episodes. None of the six deaths could be attributed to the withholding or stopping of broad-spectrum therapy. It is concluded that in febrile neutropenic patients on selective decontamination a standard therapy regimen with prolonged administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics is not necessary. After initial intervention antibiotic therapy can safely be tailored to the needs of the individual patient.

Hematologic predictors of bone marrow recovery in neutropenic patients hospitalized for fever: implications for discontinuation of antibiotics and early discharge from the hospital

We evaluated the timing and pattern of changes in the complete blood cell count that preceded marrow recovery during 107 consecutive episodes of fever and neutropenia in 64 children with cancer. Four measures derived from serial daily measurement of the complete blood cell count were evaluated: total leukocyte count, absolute neutrophil count, absolute phagocyte count, and platelet count. During 70 (65%) of these 107 episodes, patients were discharged with an absolute neutrophil count of fewer than 500 cells/mm3; 24 patients were discharged from the hospital despite an absolute neutrophil count of fewer than 100 cells/mm3. During all but one of these 70 episodes, however, signs of early marrow recovery were present before discharge; sustained increases were observed in these patients' leukocyte, absolute neutrophil, absolute phagocyte, and platelet counts 2 or more days before their discharge in 41%, 49%, 50%, and 39% of cases, respectively. Although they were neutropenic at discharge, most patients had signs of multilineage marrow recovery at that time; 59 of 70 had increases in three of four of the measurements that we studied. None of the 69 patients who had evidence of marrow recovery at discharge had recurrence of fever. We conclude that children with cancer who were hospitalized for fever during periods of neutropenia have increases in the peripheral blood cell count that herald imminent bone marrow recovery, often several days before the absolute neutrophil count recovers to 500 cells/mm3. Our success in discharging such patients before resolution of neutropenia suggests that further controlled trials are needed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of cessation of antibiotic therapy and early discharge from the hospital.

Empiric treatment of infection during granulocytopenia

Results from clinical trials conducted over the past 15 years suggest the following: a) Early empiric therapy with broad-spectrum antibiotics directed against Gram-negative bacillary bacteremia is necessary in febrile granulocytopenic cancer patients; b) The level and dynamics of the granulocyte count are extremely important in determining the outcome of bacteremia; c) Most empiric antimicrobial regimens will require therapeutic modifications; these alterations are necessary and contribute to a high overall success rate; d) Only microbiologically documented infections and especially bacteremias are useful for comparison of initial response to antimicrobial regimens; e) The response rate of Gram-negative bacillary bacteremia is clearly influenced by the susceptibility of the causative pathogen to the beta-lactam component of the empiric regimen; emergence of resistance to some beta-lactam antibiotics is quite common and necessitates successive modifications of empiric regimens with time; f) The combination of an anti-pseudomonal beta-lactam with an aminoglycoside is recommended as the standard for empiric therapy in febrile granulocytopenic cancer patients, especially in those with severe and persistent granulocytopenia who are suspected of having Gram-negative bacillary bacteremia; less neutropenic and/or asymptomatic patients may do well with monotherapy; g) Gram-positive pathogens have become a common cause of bacteremia in granulocytopenic cancer patients; the response rate to empiric regimens may be suboptimal but the associated mortality is low; h) Patients with severe granulocytopenia and protracted fever whose blood cultures remain negative are at high risk for contracting fungal infections; in these patients, empiric antifungal agents are probably indicated.

Infection in the neutropenic patient

Infection is the major cause of death in neutropenic patients. Prevention and therapy of infection are an important, dynamic component of the care of the neutropenic patient with leukemia. Nurses caring for these patients must have a current knowledge of immunosuppression, the usual sites and causative organisms, the clinical presentation, and the treatment of infection. This knowledge then needs to be applied clinically in the care of the neutropenic patient.

Infectious complications in childhood acute leukemias

Infectious complications in children with acute leukemias are reviewed as to incidence, predisposing factors, microbiologic etiologies and treatment. Principles of antimicrobiologic therapy are presented for bacterial, fungal, viral, and protozoal infections seen in children with cancer. Prevention of infection is also discussed.

Treatment of systemic fungal infections: recent progress and current problems

Systemic mycoses continue to emerge as life-threatening infections. Considerable progress in treating these infections is being achieved through better application of established available antifungal agents (amphotericin B, flucytosine, miconazole and ketoconazole), and through development of promising investigational agents (fluconazole, itraconazole). Systemic fungal infections, however, continue to present major problems, including clinical resistance, microbiological resistance, emergence of new pathogens, and involvement of more immunocompromised patients. The purpose of this paper, therefore, is to review the recent progress and current problems in treatment of systemic fungal infections.

Empiric use of vancomycin during prolonged treatment-induced granulocytopenia. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial in patients with acute leukemia

Because gram-positive infections cause morbidity following intensive antileukemic chemotherapy, the effects of vancomycin versus placebo were evaluated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 60 adult patients with acute leukemia and first infectious fever during prolonged (mean of 32 days) granulocytopenia. Gram-positive sepsis was associated with first fever in 17 (28 percent) of the 60 patients. None of 31 patients randomly assigned to receive vancomycin demonstrated gram-positive infection, whereas 16 of 22 patients randomly assigned to receive placebo subsequently had gram-positive infection (seven had sepsis, and nine had local infections; p less than 0.005). All patients with gram-positive infection were then given vancomycin, and all showed prompt clinical responses. The predominant gram-positive organism causing infection was beta-lactam-resistant Staphylococcus epidermis (19 of 44 isolates). Patients randomly assigned to receive vancomycin had more rapid resolution of first infectious fever and fewer total febrile days during the granulocytopenic course than did patients randomly assigned to receive placebo. Although vancomycin had no effect on the presence or absence of documented fungal infection, patients treated with vancomycin received empiric amphotericin B for recurrent or persistent fever later (mean of 14 days after initial antibiotic coverage was begun) than did patients receiving placebo (mean of 9.9 days; p less than 0.005), and thus received fewer total days of empiric amphotericin B therapy (mean of 16.3 days) than did patients given placebo (mean of 24.6 days; p less than 0.01). These data demonstrate that empiric use of vancomycin reduces the morbidity of gram-positive infections following intensive antileukemic therapy and decreases the need for empiric use of toxic amphotericin B.

Granulocytopenia and cancer therapy. Past problems, current solutions, future challenges

Granulocytopenia has been closely associated with cancer and its treatment. The risk for a life-threatening infection when the granulocyte count falls below 500/mm3 not only is an important complication of therapy and a major cause of death in cancer patients but also plays an important role in the design, schedule, and doses of cancer treatment regimens. While granulocytopenia remains an unavoidable complication of current therapy, improved recognition of patients at risk and prompt initiation of aggressive supportive care have had a significant impact on reducing its infection-related morbidity and mortality. In particular, early empiric antibiotic therapy when the granulocytopenic patient becomes febrile has resulted in a significant reduction in the early mortality from undiagnosed bacterial infections. New antibiotics (extended-spectrum penicillins, third generation cephalosporins) provide new options because of their broad efficacy and potential for reducing the toxicity of antimicrobial therapy. However, as bacterial infections have become better controlled, fungi have emerged as important pathogens. Early aggressive empiric antifungal therapy appears to have reduced infectious mortality, although the repertoire of effective antifungal agents is quite limited. Considerable efforts have been expended in trying to replenish granulocytes by transfusion in infected patients, but technical deficiencies have limited this approach. Current and future efforts are directed toward refining management as well as to developing methods to improve host defenses and provide prophylaxis against infections. If the full potential of current cancer therapy is to be realized, control of granulocytopenia and the prevention of infections are essential goals.