Pharmacology of fenofibrate

Human Carboxylesterase 1A Plays a Predominant Role in Hydrolysis of the Anti-Dyslipidemia Agent Fenofibrate in Humans

Fenofibrate, a marketed peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α (PPARα) agonist, has been widely used for treating severe hypertriglyceridemia and mixed dyslipidemia. As a canonical prodrug, fenofibrate can be rapidly hydrolyzed to release the active metabolite (fenofibric acid) in vivo, but the crucial enzyme(s) responsible for fenofibrate hydrolysis and the related hydrolytic kinetics have not been well-investigated. This study aimed to assign the key organs and crucial enzymes involved in fenofibrate hydrolysis in humans, as well as reveal the impact of fenofibrate hydrolysis on its non-PPAR-mediated biologic activities. Our results demonstrated that fenofibrate could be rapidly hydrolyzed in the preparations from both human liver and lung to release fenofibric acid. Reaction phenotyping assays coupling with chemical inhibition assays showed that human carboxylesterase 1A (hCES1A) played a predominant role in fenofibrate hydrolysis in human liver and lung, while human carboxylesterase 2A (hCES2A) and human monoacylglycerol esterase (hMAGL) contributed to a very lesser extent. Kinetic analyses showed that fenofibrate could be rapidly hydrolyzed by hCES1A in human liver preparations, while the inherent clearance of hCES1A-catalyzed fenofibrate hydrolysis is much higher (>200-fold) than than that of hCES2A or hMAGL. Biologic assays demonstrated that both fenofibrate and fenofibric acid showed very closed Nrf2 agonist effects, but fenofibrate hydrolysis strongly weakens its inhibitory effects against both hCES2A and hNtoum. Collectively, our findings reveal that the liver is the major organ and hCES1A is the predominant enzyme-catalyzing fenofibrate hydrolysis in humans, while fenofibrate hydrolysis significantly reduces inhibitory effects of fenofibrate against serine hydrolases. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Fenofibrate can be completely converted to fenofibric acid in humans and subsequently exert its pharmacological effects, but the hydrolytic pathways of fenofibrate in humans have not been well-investigated. This study reported that the liver was the predominant organ and human carboxylesterase 1A was the crucial enzyme involved in fenofibrate hydrolysis in humans.

Prodrug Rewards in Medicinal Chemistry: An Advance and Challenges Approach for Drug Designing

This article emphasizes the importance of prodrugs and their diverse spectrum of effects in the field of developing novel drugs for a variety of biological applications. Prodrugs are chemicals that are supplied inactively, but then go through enzymatic and chemical transformation in vivo to release the active parent medication that can have the desired pharmacological effect. By adding an inactive chemical moiety, prodrugs are improved in a number of ways that contribute to their potency and durability. For the purpose of illustrating the usefulness of the prodrug approach, this review covers examples of prodrugs that have been made available or are now undergoing human trials. Additionally, it included lists of the most common functional groups, carrier linkers, and reactive chemicals that can be used to create prodrugs. The current study also provides a brief introduction, several chemical methods and modifications for creating prodrugs and mutual prodrugs, as well as an explanation of recent advancements and difficulties in the field of prodrug design. The primary chemical carriers employed in the creation of prodrugs, such as esters, amides, imides, NH-acidic carriers, amines, alcohols, carbonyl, carboxylic, and azo-linkages, are also discussed. This review also discusses glycosidic and triglyceride mutually activated prodrugs, which aim to deliver the drugs after bioconversion at the intended site of action. The article also discusses the extensive chemistry and wide variety of applications of recently approved prodrugs, such as antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, cardiovascular, antiplatelet, antihypertensive, atherosclerotic, antiviral, etc. In order to illustrate the prodrug and mutual drug concept's various applications and highlight its many triumphs in overcoming the formulation and delivery of problematic pharmaceuticals, this work represents a thorough guide that includes the synthetic moiety for the reader.

Advanced In Vivo Prediction by Introducing Biphasic Dissolution Data into PBPK Models

Coupling biorelevant in vitro dissolution with in silico physiological-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) tools represents a promising method to describe and predict the in vivo performance of drug candidates in formulation development including non-passive transport, prodrug activation, and first-pass metabolism. The objective of the present study was to assess the predictability of human pharmacokinetics by using biphasic dissolution results obtained with the previously established BiPHa+ assay and PBPK tools. For six commercial drug products, formulated by different enabling technologies, the respective organic partitioning profiles were processed with two PBPK in silico modeling tools, namely PK-Sim and GastroPlus^®, similar to extended-release dissolution profiles. Thus, a mechanistic dissolution/precipitation model of the assessed drug products was not required. The developed elimination/distribution models were used to simulate the pharmacokinetics of the evaluated drug products and compared with available human data. In essence, an in vitro to in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) was successfully developed. Organic partitioning profiles obtained from the BiPHa+ dissolution analysis enabled highly accurate predictions of the pharmacokinetic behavior of the investigated drug products. In addition, PBPK models of (pro-)drugs with pronounced first-pass metabolism enabled adjustment of the solely passive diffusion predicting organic partitioning profiles, and increased prediction accuracy further.

Efficacy and safety of metabolic interventions for the treatment of severe COVID-19: in vitro, observational, and non-randomized open-label interventional study

Background

Viral infection is associated with a significant rewire of the host metabolic pathways, presenting attractive metabolic targets for intervention.

Methods

We chart the metabolic response of lung epithelial cells to SARS-CoV-2 infection in primary cultures and COVID-19 patient samples and perform in vitro metabolism-focused drug screen on primary lung epithelial cells infected with different strains of the virus. We perform observational analysis of Israeli patients hospitalized due to COVID-19 and comparative epidemiological analysis from cohorts in Italy and the Veteran's Health Administration in the United States. In addition, we perform a prospective non-randomized interventional open-label study in which 15 patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19 were given 145 mg/day of nanocrystallized fenofibrate added to the standard of care.

Results

SARS-CoV-2 infection produced transcriptional changes associated with increased glycolysis and lipid accumulation. Metabolism-focused drug screen showed that fenofibrate reversed lipid accumulation and blocked SARS-CoV-2 replication through a PPARα-dependent mechanism in both alpha and delta variants. Analysis of 3233 Israeli patients hospitalized due to COVID-19 supported in vitro findings. Patients taking fibrates showed significantly lower markers of immunoinflammation and faster recovery. Additional corroboration was received by comparative epidemiological analysis from cohorts in Europe and the United States. A subsequent prospective non-randomized interventional open-label study was carried out on 15 patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19. The patients were treated with 145 mg/day of nanocrystallized fenofibrate in addition to standard-of-care. Patients receiving fenofibrate demonstrated a rapid reduction in inflammation and a significantly faster recovery compared to patients admitted during the same period.

Conclusions

Taken together, our data suggest that pharmacological modulation of PPARα should be strongly considered as a potential therapeutic approach for SARS-CoV-2 infection and emphasizes the need to complete the study of fenofibrate in large randomized controlled clinical trials.

Funding

Funding was provided by European Research Council Consolidator Grants OCLD (project no. 681870) and generous gifts from the Nikoh Foundation and the Sam and Rina Frankel Foundation (YN). The interventional study was supported by Abbott (project FENOC0003).

Clinical trial number

NCT04661930.

Continuation of fibrate therapy in patients with metabolic syndrome and COVID-19: a beneficial regime worth pursuing

Based on separate protective mechanisms related to lipid metabolism, viral cell entry and inflammation, fibrate treatment might be advantageous among patients who have been taking fibrates before SARS-CoV-2 infection and continue taking them during the infection. Based on published data on hospitalized COVID-19 patients, we recommend that the clinicians should ask their patients with metabolic syndrome who are already taking fibrates to continue fibrate treatment during the COVID-19 illness. This recommendation applies to both outpatients and hospitalized patients. However, results from the ongoing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using fenofibrate treatment for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19 have yet to prove that fenofibrate is clinically significant for this indication.KEY MESSAGESThe role of fibrates as a repurpose to treat SARS-CoV-2 is under investigation in at least three ongoing RCTs.Obesity, diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidaemia, individually or clustered as a discrete phenotype, the metabolic syndrome, typically associate with a more severe course of COVID-19.Fibrate treatment seems to be most advantageous among patients who have been taken fibrates before SARS-CoV-2 infection and are continuing to take them during the infection.We recommend that the clinicians encourage their patients who are already taking fibrate to continue using the drug throughout the COVID-19 illness.

Use of fibrates is not associated with reduced risks of mortality or cardiovascular events among ESRD patients: A national cohort study

Background

Although a recent study reported that fibrates are associated with a low risk of cardiovascular (CV) death and can postpone the need for long-term hemodialysis in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), little is known regarding whether the CV protective effects of fibrates extend to patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The present study compared CV outcomes and mortality among patients with ESRD treated with fibrates, statins, neither, or their combination.

Methods

This cohort study extracted data from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD). Adult patients with ESRD and hyperlipidemia were identified and categorized into four groups (fibrate, statin, combination, and non-user groups) according to their use of different lipid-lowering therapies within 3 months prior to the commencement of permanent dialysis. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance the baseline characteristics of the groups. The follow-up outcomes were all-cause mortality, CV death, and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs).

Results

Compared with the non-user and statin groups, the fibrate group did not exhibit significantly lower risks of all-cause mortality [fibrate vs. non-user: hazard ratio (HR), 0.97; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.92–1.03; statin vs. fibrate: HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.90–1.01], CV death (fibrate vs. non-user: HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.90–1.05; statin vs. fibrate: HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.90–1.06), and MACCEs (fibrate vs. non-user: HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.96–1.10; statin vs. fibrate: HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.87–1.004). The combination of fibrates and statins (specifically moderate- to high-potency statins) did not result in lower risks of all-cause mortality, CV death, or MACCEs compared with statins alone.

Conclusion

In patients with ESRD, the use of fibrates might be not associated with reduced mortality or CV risks, regardless of whether they are used alone or in combination with statins.

Simultaneous SPECT imaging with 123I and 125I - a practical approach to assessing a drug and its carrier at the same time with dual imaging

Radiolabeling of a drug with radioactive iodine is a good method to determine its pharmacokinetics and biodistribution in vivo that only minimally alters its physicochemical properties. With dual labeling, using the two radioactive iodine isotopes ¹²³I and ¹²⁵I, two different drugs can be evaluated at the same time, or one can follow both a drug and its drug delivery system using a single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imager. One difficulty is that the two radioisotopes have overlapping gamma spectra. Our aim was therefore to develop a technique that overcomes this problem and allows for quantitative analysis of the two radioisotopes present at varied isotope ratios. For this purpose, we developed a simple method that included scatter and attenuation corrections and fully compensated for ¹²³I/¹²⁵I crosstalk, and then tested it in phantom measurements. The method was applied to the study of an orally administered lipid formulation for the delivery of fenofibrate in rats. To directly compare a traditional study, where fenofibrate was determined in plasma samples to SPECT imaging with ¹²³I-labeled fenofibrate and ¹²⁵I-labeled triolein over 24 h, the drug concentrations were converted to standardized uptake values (SUVs), an unusual unit for pharmaceutical scientists, but the standard unit for radiologists. A generally good agreement between the traditional and the radioactive imaging method was found in the pharmacokinetics and biodistribution results. Small differences are discussed in detail. Overall, SPECT imaging is an excellent method to pilot a new formulation with just a few animals, replaces blood sampling, and can very quickly highlight potential administration problems, the excretion pathways and the kinetics. Furthermore, dual labeling with the two radioisotopes ¹²³I and ¹²⁵I clearly shows if a drug and its drug delivery system stay together when traveling through the body, if slow drug release takes place, and where degradation/excretion of the components occurs.

Oral Nanoemulsion of Fenofibrate: Formulation, Characterization, and In Vitro Drug Release Studies

Nanoemulsions (NMs) are one of the most important colloidal dispersion systems that are primarily used to improve the solubility of poorly water soluble drugs. The main objectives of this study were, first, to prepare an NM loaded with fenofibrate using a high shear homogenization technique and, second, to study the effect of variable using a central composite design. Twenty batches of fenofibrate-loaded NM formulations were prepared. The formed NMs were subjected to droplet size analysis, zeta potential, entrapment efficiency, pH, dilution, polydispersity index, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), Fourier transform infrared spectrophotometry, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and in vitro drug release study. Analysis of variance was used for entrapment efficiency data to study the fitness and significance of the design. The NM-7 batch formulation demonstrated maximum entrapment efficiency (81.82%) with lowest droplet size (72.28 nm), and was thus chosen as the optimized batch. TEM analysis revealed that the NM was well dispersed with droplet sizes <100 nm. Incorporation of the drug into the NM was confirmed with DSC studies. In addition, the batch NM-7 also showed the maximum in vitro drug release (87.6%) in a 0.05 M sodium lauryl sulfate solution. The release data revealed that the NM followed first-order kinetics. The outcomes of the study revealed the development of a stable oral NM containing fenofibrate using the high shear homogenization technique. This approach may aid in further enhancing the oral bioavailability of fenofibrate, which requires further in vivo studies.

Effects of triptolide on pharmacokinetics of fenofibrate in rats and its potential mechanism

Triptolide and fenofibrate are often used together for the treatment of nephrotic syndrome in Chinese clinics. This study investigates the effects of triptolide on the pharmacokinetics of fenofibrate in rats and it potential mechanism. The pharmacokinetics of fenofibrate (20 mg/kg) with or without triptolide pretreatment (2 mg/kg/day for seven days) were investigated. Additionally, the inhibitory effects of triptolide on the metabolic stability of fenofibrate were investigated using rat liver microsome incubation systems. The results indicated that the C_max (35.34 ± 7.52 vs. 30.43 ± 6.45 μg/mL), t_1/2 (6.17 ± 1.15 vs. 4.90 ± 0.82 h) and AUC_(0-t) (468.12 ± 35.84 vs. 416.35 ± 32.68 mg h L^-1) of fenofibric acid decreased significantly (p < .05). The T_max of fenofibric acid increased significantly (p < .05) from 5.12 ± 0.36 to 6.07 ± 0.68 h. Additionally, the metabolic stability of fenofibrate was prolonged from 35.8 ± 6.2 to 48.6 ± 7.5 min (p < .05) with the pretreatment of triptolide. In conclusion, these results indicated that triptolide could affect the pharmacokinetics of fenofibric acid, possibly by inhibiting the metabolism of fenofibrate in rat liver when they were co-administered.

Review: Fibrates: therapeutic review

As agonists of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα), fibrates are established, effective and well-tolerated agents in the management of atherogenic dyslipidaemia. Key actions of fibrates include a reduction in elevated triglyceride levels (by up to 50%) and a rise in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) concentrations (typically by 5—15%). Fibrates promote a shift from small, dense low-density lipoprotein (LDL) to larger more buoyant particles, which are less susceptible to oxidation and possess higher binding affinity for removal by the non-atherogenic LDL receptor pathway. Thus, fibrates can correct lipid abnormalities commonly observed in patients with type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome. Clinical evidence has demonstrated the value of fibrate therapy in secondary and primary prevention settings, as well as in patients with type 2 diabetes. However, FIELD, the largest fibrate study to date in diabetic patients, predominantly in a primary prevention setting, showed a non-significant 11% reduction in the primary end point of coronary heart disease death and non-fatal myocardial infarction with fenofibrate, although total cardiovascular events, corresponding to the secondary end point, were significantly reduced by 11% (p=0.035). It is possible that risk reduction with fenofibrate may have been attenuated by the two-fold greater drop-in use of statin therapy in the placebo group. However, the interesting results of fenofibrate on attenuation of microangiographic symptomatology potentially suggest a new recommendation for fibrate therapy, although further studies are required to validate these findings.

A new in vitro lipid digestion - in vivo absorption model to evaluate the mechanisms of drug absorption from lipid-based formulations

PURPOSE

In vitro lipid digestion models are commonly used to screen lipid-based formulations (LBF), but in vitro-in vivo correlations are in some cases unsuccessful. Here we enhance the scope of the lipid digestion test by incorporating an absorption 'sink' into the experimental model.

METHODS

An in vitro model of lipid digestion was coupled directly to a single pass in situ intestinal perfusion experiment in an anaesthetised rat. The model allowed simultaneous real-time analysis of the digestion and absorption of LBFs of fenofibrate and was employed to evaluate the influence of formulation digestion, supersaturation and precipitation on drug absorption.

RESULTS

Formulations containing higher quantities of co-solvent and surfactant resulted in higher supersaturation and more rapid drug precipitation in vitro when compared to those containing higher quantities of lipid. In contrast, when the same formulations were examined using the coupled in vitro lipid digestion - in vivo absorption model, drug flux into the mesenteric vein was similar regardless of in vitro formulation performance.

CONCLUSION

For some drugs, simple in vitro lipid digestion models may underestimate the potential for absorption from LBFs. Consistent with recent in vivo studies, drug absorption for rapidly absorbed drugs such as fenofibrate may occur even when drug precipitation is apparent during in vitro digestion.

Pharmacological modulation of dietary lipid-induced cerebral capillary dysfunction: Considerations for reducing risk for Alzheimer's disease

An increasing body of evidence suggests that cerebrovascular dysfunction and microvessel disease precede the evolution of hallmark pathological features that characterise Alzheimer's disease (AD), consistent with a causal association for onset or progression. Recent studies, principally in genetically unmanipulated animal models, suggest that chronic ingestion of diets enriched in saturated fats and cholesterol may compromise blood-brain barrier (BBB) integrity resulting in inappropriate blood-to-brain extravasation of plasma proteins, including lipid macromolecules that may be enriched in amyloid-β (Aβ). Brain parenchymal retention of blood proteins and lipoprotein bound Aβ is associated with heightened neurovascular inflammation, altered redox homeostasis and nitric oxide (NO) metabolism. Therefore, it is a reasonable proposition that lipid-lowering agents may positively modulate BBB integrity and by extension attenuate risk or progression of AD. In addition to their robust lipid lowering properties, reported beneficial effects of lipid-lowering agents were attributed to their pleiotropic properties via modulation of inflammation, oxidative stress, NO and Aβ metabolism. The review is a contemporary consideration of a complex body of literature intended to synthesise focussed consideration of mechanisms central to regulation of BBB function and integrity. Emphasis is given to dietary fat driven significant epidemiological evidence consistent with heightened risk amongst populations consuming greater amounts of saturated fats and cholesterol. In addition, potential neurovascular benefits associated with the use of hypolipidemic statins, probucol and fenofibrate are also presented in the context of lipid-lowering and pleiotropic properties.

Over-the-counter fish oil use in a county hospital: Medication use evaluation and efficacy analysis

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the use and effectiveness of over-the-counter (OTC) fish oil supplements for triglyceride (TG) lowering.

OBJECTIVES

To (1) perform a medication-use evaluation (MUE) and (2) assess the efficacy of OTC fish oil.

METHODS

Retrospective, observational cohort study using electronic medical records and the pharmacy database from Parkland Health and Hospital System in Dallas, Texas. Parkland is a tax-supported county institution that provides patients with single-brand OTC fish oil. Two separate analyses were conducted. Six hundred seventeen patients (prescribed fish oil between July 1, 2012, and August 31, 2012) were included in the MUE analysis and 235 patients (109 fish oil, 72 fenofibrate, and 54 gemfibrozil, prescribed between January 1, 2012, and July 31, 2013) were included in the efficacy analysis. The main outcome measure for the MUE was fish oil prescribing habits including dosages and patient adherence, as defined by medication possession ratio. The main outcome measure for the efficacy analysis was change in lipids measured using the last value before fish oil treatment and the first value after fish oil treatment.

RESULTS

MUE: 617 patients received prescriptions for OTC fish oil. Sixty-four percent were prescribed a total daily dose of 2000 mg. Only 25% of patients were adherent. Efficacy analysis: despite being prescribed suboptimal doses, fish oil reduced TGs by 29% (95% confidence interval, 34.3-22.7). Compared with fish oil therapy, fibrate therapy resulted in a greater TG reduction: 48.5% (55.1-41.0) with fenofibrate and 49.8% (57.6-40.5) with gemfibrozil (P < .0001, both medications compared with fish oil).

CONCLUSIONS

Health care providers prescribe suboptimal doses of fish oil, and adherence is poor. Even at low doses (2 g/d), though, fish oil lowers TGs by 29%.

Does combination therapy with statins and fibrates prevent cardiovascular disease in diabetic patients with atherogenic mixed dyslipidemia?

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with the development and progression of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Statins have an established efficacy in the management of dyslipidemia primarily by decreasing the levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and thus decreasing CVD risk. They also have a favorable safety profile. Despite the statin-mediated benefit of CVD risk reduction a residual CVD risk remains, especially in T2DM patients with high triglyceride (TG) and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) values. Fibrates decrease TG levels, increase HDL-C concentrations, and improve many other atherosclerosis-related variables. Fibrate/statin co-administration improves the overall lipoprotein profile in patients with mixed dyslipidemia and may reduce the residual CVD risk during statin therapy. However, limited data exists regarding the effects of statin/fibrate combination on CVD outcomes in patients with T2DM. In the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) study the statin/fibrate combination did not significantly reduce the rate of CVD events compared with simvastatin/placebo in patients with T2DM. However, it did show a possible benefit in a pre-specified analysis in the subgroup of patients with high TG and low HDL-C levels. Furthermore, in the ACCORD study the simvastatin/fenofibrate combination significantly reduced the rate of progression of retinopathy compared with statin/placebo administration in patients with T2DM. The present review presents the available data regarding the effects of statin/fibrate combination in patients with T2DM and atherogenic mixed dyslipidemia.

A novel prodrug strategy for extremely hydrophobic agents: conjugation to symmetrically branched glycerol trimer improves pharmacological and pharmacokinetic properties of fenofibrate

Management of a lipophilic-hydrophilic balance is a key element in drug design to achieve desirable pharmacokinetic characters. Therefore we have created unique modular molecules, symmetrically branched oligoglycerols (BGL), as an alternative way to endow hydrophobic molecules with sufficient hydrophilicity. We have successfully demonstrated amelioration of the water solubility and thermal stability of several hydrophobic agents by covalent conjugation to BGL so far. However, it has not been clarified whether the molecular modification by BGL also improves the pharmacological and/or pharmacokinetic properties indeed. Recently, we synthesized a novel BGL-prodrug derivative of fenofibrate, which is an antihyperlipidemic agent and one of the most hydrophobic medicinal compounds currently used clinically, by conjugating fenofibric acid to symmetrically branched glycerol trimer (BGL003), the simplest BGL. We have previously demonstrated that the hydrophilicity and water solubility of fenofibrate are improved more than 2000 times just by conjugation to the BGL003. To verify our hypothesis that the prodrug strategy with BGL should improve pharmacological efficacy and pharmacokinetic properties of extremely hydrophobic agents such as fenofibrate by the rise in hydrophilicity, we evaluated the BGL003-prodrug derivative of fenofibrate (FF-BGL) using rodent models. Here we demonstrate that the lipid-lowering effects of fenofibrate are much potentiated by chemical conjugation to BGL003 without exhibiting significant toxicity. Plasma concentration of fenofibric acid, an active metabolite of fenofibrate, after single oral administration of FF-BGL was more than 3 times higher than that of fenofibrate, in accordance. In fasting rats, plasma concentration of fenofibric acid after fenofibrate administration was curtailed into less than half of that in ad libitum-fed rats, while FF-BGL showed about the same plasma level even in the starving rats. This is the first report showing that BGL-prodrug improves pharmacological and pharmacokinetic properties as well as hydrophilicity of highly hydrophobic compounds. Furthermore, prodrug strategy using BGL suggests the possibility of diminishing the food-drug interaction effects, which should be advantageous for promoting drug compliance. BGL will be a suitable prodrug strategy to ameliorate physical, pharmacological, and pharmacokinetic characteristics of extremely hydrophobic compounds.

A review of time courses and predictors of lipid changes with fenofibric acid-statin combination

Fibrates activate peroxisome proliferator activated receptor α and exert beneficial effects on triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and low density lipoprotein subspecies. Fenofibric acid (FA) has been studied in a large number of patients with mixed dyslipidemia, combined with a low- or moderate-dose statin. The combination of FA with simvastatin, atorvastatin and rosuvastatin resulted in greater improvement of the overall lipid profile compared with the corresponding statin dose. The long-term efficacy of FA combined with low- or moderate- dose statin has been demonstrated in a wide range of patients, including patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, metabolic syndrome, or elderly subjects. The FA and statin combination seems to be a reasonable option to further reduce cardiovascular risk in high-risk populations, although trials examining cardiovascular disease events are missing.

Management of dyslipidemias with fibrates, alone and in combination with statins: role of delayed-release fenofibric acid

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) represents the leading cause of mortality worldwide. Lifestyle modifications, along with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction, remain the highest priorities in CVD risk management. Among lipid-lowering agents, statins are most effective in LDL-C reduction and have demonstrated incremental benefits in CVD risk reduction. However, in light of the residual CVD risk, even after LDL-C targets are achieved, there is an unmet clinical need for additional measures. Fibrates are well known for their beneficial effects in triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and LDL-C subspecies modulation. Fenofibrate is the most commonly used fibric acid derivative, exerts beneficial effects in several lipid and nonlipid parameters, and is considered the most suitable fibrate to combine with a statin. However, in clinical practice this combination raises concerns about safety. ABT-335 (fenofibric acid, Trilipix^®) is the newest formulation designed to overcome the drawbacks of older fibrates, particularly in terms of pharmacokinetic properties. It has been extensively evaluated both as monotherapy and in combination with atorvastatin, rosuvastatin, and simvastatin in a large number of patients with mixed dyslipidemia for up to 2 years and appears to be a safe and effective option in the management of dyslipidemia.

Retrospective comparison of the effectiveness of a fenofibrate 145 mg formulation compared with the standard 160 mg tablet

OBJECTIVE

To compare changes in lipid levels (total cholesterol [total-C], low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C], triglycerides [TG], and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [HDL-C]) for patients who switched from standard fenofibrate 160 mg (requiring dosing with food) to fenofibrate 145 mg with no food effect (NFE).

METHODS

The analyses were performed using an electronic medical records dataset from 1 January 2003 to 31 July 2005. Patients were eligible for the analysis if they had a diagnosis of hypertension, dyslipidaemia or diabetes mellitus, were written a prescription for standard fenofibrate 160 mg during the period 1 May 2004 to 30 April 2005, and were written a subsequent prescription for fenofibrate 145 mg NFE at least 60 days after first receiving the 160 mg dose. The outcomes measured were lipid levels: total-C, LDL-C, HDL-C and TG.

RESULTS

491 patients who switched from standard fenofibrate 160 mg to fenofibrate 145 mg NFE met all of the inclusion criteria. Patients who changed therapy to fenofibrate 145 mg NFE from standard fenofibrate 160 mg showed a beneficial response in lipid levels. Statistically significant patient-specific changes in lipid levels were observed for the change from baseline to standard fenofibrate 160 mg for three lipid levels (total-C, HDL-C and TG). Statistically significant changes were observed for the switch to fenofibrate 145 mg NFE for three lipid levels (total-C, LDL-C and TG).

CONCLUSIONS

More patients treated in an outpatient clinical practice had better lipid results when prescribed fenofibrate 145 mg NFE than those prescribed standard fenofibrate 160 mg, suggesting that a less restrictive dosing regimen improves lipid outcomes.

Managing dyslipidemia in chronic kidney disease

The incidence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in the U.S. continues to increase, and now over 10% of the U.S. population has some form of CKD. Although some patients with CKD will ultimately develop renal failure, most patients with CKD will die of cardiovascular disease before dialysis becomes necessary. Patients with CKD have major proatherogenic lipid abnormalities that are treatable with readily available therapies. The severe derangements seen in lipoprotein metabolism in patients with CKD typically results in high triglycerides and low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol. Because of the prevalence of triglyceride disorders in patients with CKD, after treating patients to a low-density lipoprotein goal, non-HDL should be calculated and used as the secondary goal of treatment. A review of the evidence from subgroup analysis of several landmark lipid-lowering trials supports treating dyslipidemia in mild to moderate CKD patients with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. The evidence to support treating dyslipidemia in hemodialysis patients, however, has been mixed, with several outcome trials pending. Patients with CKD frequently have mixed dyslipidemia and often require treatment with multiple lipid-lowering drugs. Although statins are the cornerstone of therapy for most patients with CKD, differences in their pharmacokinetic properties give some statins a safety advantage in patients with advanced CKD. Although most other lipid-lowering agents can be used safely with statins in combination therapy in patients with CKD, the fibrates are renally metabolized and require both adjustments in dose and very careful monitoring due to the increased risk of rhabdomyolysis. After reviewing the safety and dose alterations required in managing dyslipidemia in patients with CKD, a practical treatment algorithm is proposed.

Fenofibrate: a novel formulation (Triglide) in the treatment of lipid disorders: a review

Cardiovascular disease is the major cause of mortality worldwide and accounts for approximately 40% of all deaths. Dyslipidemia is one of the primary causes of atherosclerosis and effective interventions to correct dyslipidemia should form an integral component of any strategy aimed at preventing cardiovascular disease. Fibrates have played a major role in the treatment of hyperlipidemia for more than two decades. Fenofibrate is one of the most commonly used fibrates worldwide. Since fenofibrate was first introduced in clinical practice, a major drawback has been its low bioavailability when taken under fasting conditions. Insoluble Drug Delivery-Microparticle fenofibrate is a new formulation that has an equivalent extent of absorption under fed or fasting conditions. In this review, we will discuss the clinical pharmacology of fenofibrate, with particular emphasis on this novel formulation, as well as its lipid-modulating and pleiotropic actions. We will also analyze the major trial that evaluated fibrates for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease, the safety and efficacy profile of fibrate-statin combination treatment, and the current recommendations regarding the use of fibrates in clinical practice.

The role of fibrates in managing hyperlipidemia: Mechanisms of action and clinical efficacy

At a time when the lipid management guidelines give more and more emphasis to the identification and treatment of high-risk patients with the metabolic syndrome and diabetes, there is an obvious need to balance the known effects of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) lowering with the new evidence of clinical efficacy derived from the adjustment of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and triglyceride levels. Whereas the statins remain the drug of choice for patients who need to reach the LDL goal, fibrate therapy may represent the best intervention for subjects with atherogenic dyslipidemia and an LDL already close to goal. In addition, the concomitant use of fibrates may significantly reduce cardiovascular risk in patients whose LDL is controlled by statin therapy. In this review, we evaluate the pharmacologic properties of the fibrate drugs, with particular attention to the effects of peroxisome proliferator activated receptor a activation in the control of dyslipidemia as well as in the attenuation of arterial inflammation. Clinical trials of fibrates, such as the Helsinki Heart Study, Veterans Affairs High-density lipoprotein Intervention Trial, Diabetes Atherosclerosis Intervention Study, and Bezafibrate Infarction Prevention trial, have conjured up a scenario for the clinical utility of fibrates and their possible superiority to statins in the management of obese, insulin-resistant, and diabetic patients presenting with near-goal LDL and inappropriate HDL and triglyceride levels.

Fenofibrate in the treatment of dyslipidemia: a review of the data as they relate to the new suprabioavailable tablet formulation

BACKGROUND

The fibric acid derivative fenofibrate is indicated as an adjunct to dietary modification in adults with primary hypercholesterolemia or mixed dyslipidemia (types IIa and IIb hyperlipidemia, Fredrickson classification) to reduce levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), and apolipoprotein (apo) B, and to increase levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and apo A. It is also indicated as adjunctive therapy to diet for the treatment of hypertriglyceridemia (types IV and V hyperlipidemia). Initially approved in the United States in a micronized capsule formulation, fenofibrate is now available in a new "suprabioavailable" tablet formulation that has increased bioavailability, achieving equivalent plasma concentrations at lower doses. The 67- and 200-mg micronized capsules can be considered equivalent to the 54- and 160-mg suprabioavailable tablets, respectively.

OBJECTIVE

This paper reviews the pharmacologic properties, clinical usefulness, and safety profile of fenofibrate in the management of dyslipidemias.

METHODS

Recent studies, abstracts, reviews, and consensus statements published in the English-language literature were identified through searches of MEDLINE (1966-January 2002), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-January 2002), and PharmaProjects (1990-January 2002) using the search terms fenofibrate, fibrates, hyperlipidemia, hypertriglyceridemia, and dyslipidemia.

RESULTS

Fenofibrate is well absorbed after oral administration, with peak plasma levels attained in 6 to 8 hours. The absolute bioavailability of fenofibrate cannot be determined due to its being virtually insoluble in aqueous media suitable for injection; however, after oral administration of a single dose of radiolabeled fenofibrate, approximately 60% of the dose appeared in urine, primarily as fenofibric acid and its glucuronated conjugate, and approximately 25% was excreted in the feces. The apparent volume of distribution is 0.89 L/kg in healthy volunteers, and protein binding is approximately 99% in healthy and hyperlipidemic patients. Neither fenofibrate nor fenofibric acid appears to undergo significant oxidative metabolism in vivo. Fenofibric acid has a half-life of 20 hours. Fenofibrate is effective in lowering TG levels and increasing HDL-C levels. Its LDL-C-lowering effect is greater than that of gemfibrozil. Adverse effects of fenofibrate appear to be similar to those of other fibrates, including gastrointestinal symptoms, cholelithiasis, hepatitis, myositis, and rash. Fenofibrate therapy has been associated with increases in serum aminotransferase levels, and clinical monitoring of these markers of liver function should be performed regularly.

CONCLUSIONS

Fenofibrate is effective in reducing levels of TG, TC, and LDL-C, and increasing levels of HDL-C in patients with dyslipidemias. Its efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of hypertriglyceridemia and combined hyperlipidemia have been demonstrated in numerous clinical trials. Its use is accompanied by a low incidence of adverse effects and laboratory abnormalities. Fenofibrate protects against coronary heart disease not only through its effects on lipid parameters but also by producing alterations in LDL structure and, possibly, alterations in the various hemostatic parameters. Its uricosuric property may prove to be a useful adjunctive attribute.

A laser flash photolysis study of fenofibric acid in aqueous buffered media: unexpected triplet state inversion in a derivative of 4-alkoxybenzophenone

Laser excitation of aqueous solutions of fenofibric acid (FA) at pH 7.4 show the formation of two reaction intermediates, the triplet state and the hydrated electron. The former is longer lived in water than in acetonitrile; its anionic form decays irreversibly by decarboxylation to give a carbanion that protonates before or after rearrangement. Several spectroscopic and quenching studies suggest that in aqueous media the triplet state of FA has a pi,pi* character, in comparison with an n,pi* character in organic media. Further, the known chemistry of the triplet, including decarboxylation and hydrogen abstraction, occurs predominantly from the n,pi* state, and as a consequence, activation energies are higher when the lowest triplet has a pi,pi* character. Photoionization is more important in aqueous than in organic media and involves a biphotonic process. Hydrated electrons are trapped by FA, leading to the corresponding ketyl radical after protonation.

Distribution of fenofibric acid in lipoprotein fractions of patients

The antidyslipidemic agent fenofibrate (procetofen) is hydrolysed in vivo to its main active metabolite--fenofibric (procetofenic) acid. This metabolite is usually determined in pharmacokinetic studies, because plasma concentrations of fenofibrate are practically undetectable. Presented study is focussed on the distribution of fenofibric acid into lipoprotein (VLDL, LDL, IDL and HDL) fractions of human and (for comparison) minipig blood plasma, which has not been studied yet. In order to obtain more accurate results, a new HPLC method based on the use of newly synthetized internal standards was developed. Four homologues of fenofibric acid prepared have identical chromophoric part of their molecules and hence the same UV spectra as fenofibric acid. From this point of view, these standards are more suitable for determination of fenofibric acid than the formerly used ones--naproxen or bezafibrate. Fenofibric acid levels in the high density lipoprotein fraction has been shown to be significantly higher (in both human and minipig plasma) than in the other lipoprotein fractions. This fact may be explained by higher affinity of the fenofibric acid to proteins constituting major part of the high density lipoprotein fraction.

Photosensitization by fenofibrate. II. In vitro phototoxicity of the major metabolites

Fenofibric acid, the major metabolite of fenofibrate, was found to be photolabile. Its irradiation in aqueous solution gave rise to two photoproducts, whose formation involves photodecarboxylation of the dissociated acid to an aryloxy-substituted carbanion, which is directly protonated or, alternatively, undergoes a Wittig rearrangement. A comparative in vitro phototoxicity study has been carried out on the anti-hyperlipoproteinemic drug fenofibrate, its metabolites and the photoproducts of fenofibric acid. Fenofibrate, fenofibric acid and its two photoproducts were found to be active when examined by the photohemolysis test and were able to photosensitize peroxidation of linoleic acid, as evidenced by the UV monitoring of dienic hydroperoxides. In summary, the major metabolite of fenofibrate (fenofibric acid), as well as its photoproducts, are phototoxic in vitro. This behavior can be attributed to the fact that the four compounds retain the benzophenone chromophore present in fenofibrate and is indicative of free radical-mediated photosensitization. In agreement with this rationalization, the metabolites with a reduced ketone functionality exhibit no detectable in vitro phototoxicity.

Photosensitivity induced by fibric acid derivatives and its relation to photocontact dermatitis to ketoprofen

BACKGROUND

Photosensitivity reactions to fibric acid derivatives are not well understood and have been rarely reported.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to describe two cases of photosensitivity, one induced by fenofibrate and one by bezafibrate; to study the in vivo photosensitizing potential of these drugs; and to evaluate the possibility of cross-reactivity between fenofibrate and ketoprofen.

METHODS

Patch and photopatch tests with fibric acid derivatives and ketoprofen were performed in the patients, in 12 normal volunteers, and in 7 patients with photopatch-proven photocontact dermatitis to ketoprofen. Phototesting studies were performed both while the patients were taking the drugs and after withdrawal of them, as well as in a group of 18 hyperlipemic volunteers without history of photosensitivity who were taking therapeutic doses of fenofibrate or bezafibrate for 2 to 3 months.

RESULTS

Positive photopatch test responses to ketoprofen and to fenofibrate were obtained only in the first patient, who also had a weaker positive ordinary patch test response to the latter. Five patients photosensitized to ketoprofen also had a positive patch test to fenofibrate. Phototesting studies were abnormal in both patients but normal in all volunteers.

CONCLUSION

An association between systemic photosensitivity to fenofibrate and photocontact sensitivity to ketoprofen seems to exist. The structural similarities of these chemicals favor cross-reactivity.

Effects of gemfibrozil and other fibric acid derivatives on blood lipids and lipoproteins

Fibric acid derivatives (FADs) are a class of drugs that have been shown to reduce the production of very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) while enhancing VLDL clearance due to the stimulation of lipoprotein lipase activity. The drugs can reduce plasma triglyceride levels while raising high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels. Their effects on low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels are less marked and more variable. There is evidence that oral gemfibrozil (Lopid, Parke-Davis, Morris Plains, NJ) can reduce the risk of serious coronary events, specifically in those patients who had elevations of both LDL cholesterol levels and total plasma triglyceride levels with lower HDL cholesterol levels. Newer FADs (bezafibrate, ciprofibrate, fenofibrate) have been shown to have greater efficacy in reducing LDL cholesterol than gemfibrozil but, in general, these drugs are not as effective as the other primary drugs used to lower LDL levels. The FADs are also used to treat adult patients with very high levels of triglycerides who have pancreatitis and whose disease cannot be managed with dietary therapy. The FADs are well tolerated, with dyspepsia and abdominal pain the most common adverse effects. A small risk of cholelithiasis exists with these drugs, and caution should be used when combining these drugs with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors because the combination increases the incidence of hyperlipidemic myositis and rhabdomyolysis.

A review of combined hyperlipidaemia and its treatment with fenofibrate

Approximately 15% of myocardial infarction survivors less than 60 years of age have a plasma lipid abnormality defined as combined hyperlipidaemia. Patients with this condition are at substantial risk for future cardiovascular events. Combined hyperlipidaemia involves elevations in both plasma triglycerides and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and may share similarities with hyperapolipoproteinaemia, LDL-pattern B and the small LDL-pattern. Treatment is directed at reduction of LDL-cholesterol and plasma triglyceride values. Nicotinic acid and the fibric acid derivatives are useful therapeutic agents. Fenofibrate is a fibric acid derivative that lowers both triglycerides and LDL-cholesterol in combined hyperlipidaemia. In combined hyperlipidaemia, fenofibrate has been shown to reduce significantly plasma triglycerides by approximately 40%, LDL-cholesterol by 6%, and to increase high-density lipoprotein cholesterol by 15%. Apoproteins are favourably altered with increases in apoprotein-A, decreases in apoprotein-E and inconsistent decreases in apoprotein-B. Fenofibrate is well tolerated with primarily dermatological side-effects.

Potential use of fenofibrate and other fibric acid derivatives in the clinic

The fibric acid derivatives continue to have a place in the treatment of hyperlipidemia. The third generation of these drugs, including fenofibrate, appears to offer some advantages over those currently available in the United States. These drugs should be prescribed only after dietary and lifestyle changes have been offered as the preferable treatment. In severe hypertriglyceridemia, clofibrate, gemfibrozil, or fenofibrate may reduce the very low-density lipoprotein and chylomicron levels adequately. Dysbetalipoproteinemia may also be completely controlled by a combination of diet and any one of these drugs. When the low-density lipoprotein level is elevated, the newer fibric acid derivatives, such as fenofibrate, may be more effective in lowering the plasma cholesterol levels. This is true for those patients with elevated low-density lipoprotein and normal very low-density lipoprotein triglyceride levels, as well as those with elevated very low-density lipoprotein triglyceride levels. A 20 percent reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels is expected when the triglyceride levels are not elevated. When the very low-density lipoprotein triglyceride levels are elevated, the low-density lipoprotein response is more variable, and on occasion the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level may rise as the very low-density lipoprotein level is reduced. The average reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (about 6 percent) caused by fenofibrate may be greater in patients with elevated very low-density lipoprotein triglyceride levels than by other fibrates. In combination with other agents that lower low-density lipoprotein levels more specifically, such as the bile acid sequestrants and hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors, fenofibrate may act to effect control of the triglycerides allowing management of those patients with disorders producing elevated very low-density lipoprotein and low-density lipoprotein levels. Extensive European experience with fenofibrate (six million patient-years) indicates that severe side effects are unlikely. However, the physician should monitor patients for skin rash, liver and renal function abnormalities, gastrointestinal dysfunction, and generalized muscle tenderness. All of these usually appear very early in the course of treatment and are reversible. Of greater concern is the possibility of an increased incidence of cholelithiasis, since the bile becomes relatively enriched in cholesterol during therapy with any fibric acid derivative.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)