Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis in aortic position: long-term follow-up 1980 to 1994

Possible Link Between the ABO Blood Group of Bioprosthesis Recipients and Specific Types of Structural Degeneration

Background Pigs/bovines share common antigens with humans: α-Gal, present in all pigs/bovines close to the human B-antigen; and AH-histo-blood-group antigen, identical to human AH-antigen and present only in some animals. We investigate the possible impact of patients' ABO blood group on bioprosthesis structural valve degeneration (SVD) through calcification/pannus/tears/perforations for patients ≤60 years at implantation. Methods and Results This was a single-center study (Paris, France) that included all degenerative bioprostheses explanted between 1985 and 1998, mostly porcine bioprostheses (Carpentier-Edwards second/third porcine bioprostheses) and some bovine bioprostheses. For the period 1998 to 2014, only porcine bioprostheses with longevity ≥13 years were included (total follow-up ≥29 years). Except for blood groups, important predictive factors for SVD were prospectively collected (age at implantation/longevity/number/site/sex/SVD types) and analyzed using logistic regression. All variables were available for 500 explanted porcine bioprostheses. By multivariate analyses, the A group was associated with an increased risk of: tears (odds ratio[OR], 1.61; P=0.026); pannus (OR, 1.5; P=0.054), pannus with tears (OR, 1.73; P=0.037), and tendency for lower risk of: calcifications (OR, 0.63; P=0.087) or isolated calcification (OR, 0.67; P=0.17). A-antigen was associated with lower risk of perforations (OR 0.56; P=0.087). B-group patients had an increased risk of: perforations (OR, 1.73; P=0.043); having a pannus that was calcified (OR, 3.0, P=0.025). B-antigen was associated with a propensity for calcifications in general (OR, 1.34; P=0.25). Conclusions Patient's ABO blood group is associated with specific SVD types. We hypothesize that carbohydrate antigens, which may or may not be common to patient and animal bioprosthetic tissue, will determine a patient's specific immunoreactivity with respect to xenograft tissue and thus bioprosthesis outcome in terms of SVD.

Durability of Mitral Valve Bioprostheses: A Meta-Analysis of Long-Term Follow-up Studies

BACKGROUND

Porcine and pericardial valves exhibited similar freedom from structural valve deterioration after aortic valve replacement. Limited data exist regarding their durability at long-term follow-up in the mitral position.

METHODS

A literature search was performed through online databases. Papers reporting freedom from tissue valve deterioration after mitral valve replacement with a follow-up longer than 5 years were retrieved. Four porcine valves (Carpentier-Edwards [Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA] and Hancock, Hancock II, and Mosaic [Medtronic, Inc, Minneapolis, MN]) and 1 pericardial prosthesis (Carpentier-Edwards) were the objects of the study. The structural valve deterioration (SVD) rate per year was calculated for each type of prosthesis. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test analysis were performed to compare the long-term durability of porcine and pericardial valves.

RESULTS

Forty full-text papers including more than 15,000 patients were considered for the meta-analysis. Porcine valves were generally implanted in younger patients in the first period after their introduction. The mean age of the patients receiving a mitral bioprosthesis increased from 50 to 70 years over the decades. In patients operated after 1980 who had similar mean age at the time of implant, freedom from SVD was higher in the group of porcine valves with Mosaic prosthesis, showing the lowest rate of SVD. Long-term survival was higher for Mosaic porcine and Carpentier pericardial valves.

CONCLUSIONS

In surgical populations that underwent mitral valve replacement after 1980 with new generation tissue valves and similar mean age at the implant time, we found, at long-term follow-up, a higher freedom from SVD in the group of porcine prostheses.

Recipients with blood group A associated with longer survival rates in cardiac valvular bioprostheses

Background

Pigs/bovines share with humans some of the antigens present on cardiac valves. Two such antigens are: the major xenogenic Ag, “Gal” present in all pig/bovine very close to human B-antigen of ABO-blood-group system; the minor Ag, pig histo-blood-group AH-antigen identical to human AH-antigen and present by some animals. We hypothesize that these antigens may modify the immunogenicity of the bioprosthesis and also its longevity. ABO distribution may vary between patients with low (<6 years) and high (≥15 years) bioprostheses longevity.

Methods

Single-centre registry study (Paris, France) including all degenerative porcine bioprostheses (mostly Carpentier-Edwards 2nd/3rd generation heart valves) explanted between 1985 and 1998 and some bovine bioprostheses. For period 1998–2014, all porcine bioprostheses with longevity ≥13 years (follow-up ≥29 years). Important predictive factors for bioprosthesis longevity: number, site of implantation, age were collected. Blood group and other variables were entered into an ordinal logistic regression analysis model predicting valve longevity, categorized as low (<6 years), medium (6–14.9 years), and high (≥15 years).

Findings

Longevity and ABO-blood group were obtained for 483 explanted porcine bioprostheses. Mean longevity was 10.2 ± 3.9 years [0–28] and significantly higher for A-patients than others (P = 0.009). Using multivariate analysis, group A was a strong predictive factor of longevity (OR 2.09; P < 0.001). For the 64 explanted bovine bioprosthesis with low/medium longevity, the association, with A-group was even more significant.

Interpretation

Patients of A-group but not B have a higher longevity of their bioprostheses. Future graft-host phenotyping and matching may give rise to a new generation of long-lasting bioprosthesis for implantation in humans, especially for the younger population.

Fund

None.

Carpentier-Edwards Bioprosthesis: Structural Deterioration by Age Groups

The Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular porcine bioprosthesis (second generation prosthesis) was implanted in 2438 patients in 2482 operations between 1982 and 1992. The mean age of the population was 64 years with a range from 21 years to 89 years. There were 1334 aortic and 934 mitral valve replacements. The population was divided into five groups: 21 to 40 years (n = 132); 41 to 50 years (n = 189); 51 to 60 years (n = 454); 61 to 70 years (n = 849); and over 70 years (n = 858). There was no difference in sunival by valve position for age groups 21 to 40 years and 41 to 50 years. Sunival within the age groups 51 to 60 years, 61 to 70 years, and over 70 years was greater for patients with aortic compared with mitral and multiple valve replacements. The freedom from structural valve deterioration at 10 years for all age groups was highest for valves in the aortic position. Patients with valves in the mitral position had a higher freedom from structural valve deterioration at 10 years than those who had multiple valve replacement, although not all the differences were significant. There was a lower incidence of structural valve deterioration in the older age groups. We concluded that the use of the Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular porcine bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement can be extended to patients over 60 years of age, while its use for mitral valve replacement can be extended to those above 70 years of age.

EFFICACY OF CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERICARDIAL PROSTHESES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

Objectives: The Carpentier-Edwards pericardial (CEP) prostheses are the type of bioprostheses most used worldwide. Although they were designed to minimize the rate of valve deterioration and reoperation, their clinical superiority over other prostheses models still lacks confirmation. The objective of this study was to evaluate its effectiveness.

Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Lilacs databases. Operative mortality, overall mortality and reoperation rates after heart valve surgery were compared between the use of CEP and other cardiac prostheses. Two independent reviewers screened studies for inclusion and extracted the data. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. The GRADE criterion was used to assess the evidence quality.

Results: A total of twenty-eight studies were selected, including 19,615 individuals. The studies presented a high heterogeneity and low quality of evidence what limited the reliability of the results. The pooled data from the selected studies did not demonstrate significant differences between CEP and porcine, pericardial or stentless prostheses regarding operative mortality, overall mortality and reoperation rates. However, the pooled data from 3 observational trials pointed out a higher risk for reoperation after valve replacement using CEP prostheses against mechanical prostheses (OR 4.92 [95 percent confidence interval 2.43–9.96]).

Conclusions: The current data present in the literature still does not support a clinical advantage for the use of CEP prostheses over other bioprostheses. The quality of the studies in the literature is limited and further studies are needed to address if CEP prostheses will have a clinical advantage over other prostheses.

Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve in the aortic position: 25-years experience

BACKGROUND

The Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve was designed to minimize structural valve deterioration. Excellent durability and low incidence of valve-related complications have been reported. The objective of the present study was to analyze clinical results after 25 years of experience with this valve implanted in the aortic position. The effect of patient age at the time of surgery was also evaluated.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of 2,405 patients from November 1981 to March 2011. Primary outcomes of interest were survival and freedom from major adverse effects such as thromboembolic, endocarditis, and reoperation.

RESULTS

Sixty percent were male, with a mean age of 71 ± 9 years old. Actuarial survival rates including early deaths averaged 78% ± 2%, 55% ± 2%, and 16 % ± 2% after 5, 10, and 20 years of follow-up, respectively. The freedom rate of valve reoperation for prosthesis dysfunction and all other causes averaged 98 % ± 0.2%, 96% ± 1%, and 67% ± 4% at 5, 10, and 20 years. Patients younger than 60 years of age had a 15-year survival averaging 54% ± 5% compared with patients aged between 60 and 70 years of age averaging 46% ± 3% and with patients older than 70 years of age averaging 28% ± 3% (p = 0.001). Survival at 5, 10, and 20 years for patients who had concomitant CABG [coronary artery bypass grafting] were 78% ± 1%, 55% ± 2%, and 9% ± 3% compared with no concomitant CABG (84% ± 1%, 62% ± 2%, and 22% ± 3% (p < 0.001)).

CONCLUSIONS

Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve implantation in the aortic position is secure and durable. The effects of age influence reoperation rate and survival as well as a concomitant coronary artery bypass procedure.

Performance of bovine pericardial valves in the pulmonary position

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to determine the outcome and performance of bovine pericardial valves in the pulmonary position.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of all patients with congenital heart disease who had pulmonary valve replacement using a bovine pericardial valve from 2002 to 2009 at a single institution.

RESULTS

There were 73 consecutive patients, with a median age of 17.3 years (range, 2.1 to 64.4). Their diagnosis was tetralogy of Fallot (n = 47), pulmonary stenosis (n = 11), or other (n = 15). Sixty-nine patients had 91 previous surgical procedures. The mean time from last surgery was 19.9 ± 11.6 years. Forty-three patients had concomitant surgical procedures. There were no perioperative deaths. Clinical follow-up was available in 68 patients (93%). There were no late deaths, and all patients were in New York Heart Association functional class I during a median follow-up period of 2.6 years (range, 0.2 to 8.0). One patient had endocarditis necessitating valve removal 2 years after surgery. Freedom from pulmonary valve reoperation was 100%, 97.7%, and 97.7% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively (95% confidence interval: 93.2% to 100%). Mean pulmonary valve gradient at follow-up was 19 ± 14 mm Hg. Degree of pulmonary insufficiency was less than moderate in 62 patients, moderate in 4, and more than moderate in 2. Freedom from moderate-severe or severe pulmonary insufficiency was 97.7%, 89.1%, and 89.1% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively (5-year 95% confidence interval: 77.0% to 100%).

CONCLUSIONS

Pulmonary valve replacement using a bovine pericardial valve can be accomplished with low perioperative morbidity and favorable midterm outcomes. Further follow-up is necessary to evaluate the long-term performance of bovine pericardial valves in the pulmonary position.

Anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy of bioprosthetic heart valves recipients: an unresolved issue

Improvements in the performance and longevity of biological valve prostheses have steadily increased their rates of implantation in recent years. Aortic bioprostheses, which are commonly used in the elderly or when the risks of anticoagulating are high, have generally been associated with low rates of long-term complications. Freedom from anticoagulation, therefore, represents the main theoretical advantage of biological, compared with mechanical, aortic prostheses. While a variety of anticoagulant and antiplatelet drug regimens have been described, a precise antithrombotic protocol for the early postoperative period after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement has not been developed. There are also important differences between the international guidelines published. This review examines the clinical evidence concerning the use of vitamin K antagonist and antiplatelet therapy in the early management of the antithrombotic complications after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement.

Risk-corrected impact of mechanical versus bioprosthetic valves on long-term mortality after aortic valve replacement

OBJECTIVE

Choice of a mechanical or biologic valve in aortic valve replacement remains controversial and rotates around different complications with different time-related incidence rates. Because serious complications will always "spill over" into mortality, our aim was to perform a meta-analysis on overall mortality after aortic valve replacement from series with a maximum follow-up of at least 10 years to determine the age- and risk factor-corrected impact of currently available mechanical versus stented bioprosthetic valves.

METHODS

Following a formal study protocol, we performed a dedicated literature search of publications during 1989 to 2004 and included articles on adult aortic valve replacement with a mechanical or stented bioprosthetic valve if age, mortality statistics, and prevalences of well-known risk factors could be extracted. We used standard and robust regression analyses of the case series data with valve type as a fixed variable.

RESULTS

We could include 32 articles with 15 mechanical and 23 biologic valve series totaling 17,439 patients and 101,819 patient-years. The mechanical and biologic valve series differed in regard to mean age (58 vs 69 years), mean follow-up (6.4 vs 5.3 years), coronary artery bypass grafting (16% vs 34%), endocarditis (7% vs 2%), and overall death rate (3.99 vs 6.33 %/patient-year). Mean age of the valve series was directly related to death rate with no interaction with valve type. Death rate corrected for age, New York Heart Association classes III and IV, aortic regurgitation, and coronary artery bypass grafting left valve type with no effect. Included articles that abided by current guidelines and compared a mechanical and biologic valve found no differences in rates of thromboembolism.

CONCLUSION

There was no difference in risk factor-corrected overall death rate between mechanical or bioprosthetic aortic valves irrespective of age. Choice of prosthetic valve should therefore not be rigorously based on age alone. Risk of bioprosthetic valve degeneration in young and middle-aged patients and in the elderly and old with a long life expectancy would be an important factor because risk of stroke may primarily be related to patient factors.

Prognosis After Aortic Valve Replacement With the Carpentier-Edwards Pericardial Valve: Use of Microsimulation

BACKGROUND

The second-generation Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve (Edwards Lifesciences LLC, Irvine, CA) is widely used for aortic valve replacement. However, knowledge on the long-term outcomes of patients after valve implantation is incomplete. We used microsimulation to calculate the long-term outcome of any given patient after aortic valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve.

METHODS

A meta-analysis of 8 reports on aortic valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve (2,685 patients; 12,250 patient years) was used to estimate the hazards of valve-related events other than structural valvular deterioration. Structural valvular deterioration was described by age-dependent Weibull curves calculated from 18-year follow-up, premarket approval, Carpentier-Edwards pericardial primary data. These estimates provided the input data for the parameters of the microsimulation model, which was then used to calculate the outcomes of patients of different ages after valve implantation. The model estimates of survival were validated using two external data sets.

RESULTS

The Weibull analysis estimated a median time to reoperation for structural valvular deterioration ranging from 18.1 years for a 55-year-old male to 23.2 years for a 75-year-old male. For a 65-year-old male, microsimulation calculated a life expectancy and event-free life expectancy of 10.8 and 9.1 years, respectively. The lifetime risk of at least one valve-related event was 38% and that of reoperation due to structural valvular deterioration 17%, respectively, for this patient. The model estimates of survival showed good agreement with external data.

CONCLUSIONS

Microsimulation provides detailed insight into the long-term prognosis of patients after aortic valve replacement. The Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve performs satisfactorily and offers a low lifetime risk of reoperation due to structural valvular deterioration, especially for elderly patients requiring aortic valve replacement.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation and mitral valve repair: state of the art

Surgical replacement of cardiac valves evolved significantly since its first use. Evolution of techniques and valves used was driven by the frequent complications encountered with surgically implanted valves. Transcatheter implantation of valves is a new technique which continues to be under investigation and promises to perform a task with less risk and potentially better outcome. In addition, new techniques are being developed to address minimizing mitral regurgitation. Progress in transcatheter valve implantation and catheter mitral annuloplasty is reviewed in this article.

Is early anticoagulation with warfarin necessary after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement?

OBJECTIVES

Freedom from anticoagulation is the principal advantage of bioprosthesis; however, the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology and the American College of Chest Physicians guidelines recommend early anticoagulation with heparin, followed by warfarin for 3 months after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement. We examined neurologic events within 90 days of bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement at our institution.

METHODS

Between 1993 and 2000, 1151 patients underwent bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement with (641) or without (510) associated coronary artery bypass. By surgeon preference, 624 had early postoperative anticoagulation (AC+) and 527 did not (AC-). In the AC- group, 410 patients (78%) received antiplatelet therapy. Groups were similar with respect to gender (female, 36% AC+ vs 40% AC-, P = .21), hypertension (64% AC+ vs 61%, P = .27), and prior stroke (7.6% AC+ vs 8.5% AC-, P = .54). The AC+ group was slightly younger than the AC- group (median, 76 years vs 78 years, P = .006).

RESULTS

Operative mortality was 4.1% with 43 (3.7%) cerebrovascular events within 90 days. Excluding 18 deficits apparent upon emergence from anesthesia, we found that postoperative cerebrovascular accident occurred in 2.4% of AC+ and 1.9% AC- patients. By multivariable analysis, the only predictor of operative mortality was hypertension ( P < .0001). Postoperative cerebrovascular accident was unrelated to warfarin use ( P = .32). The incidence of mediastinal bleeding requiring reexploration was similar (5.0% vs 7.4%), as were other bleeding complications in the first 90 days (1.1% vs 0.8%). No variables were predictive of bleeding by multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Although these data do not address the role of antiplatelet agents, early anticoagulation with warfarin after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement did not appear to protect against neurologic events.

Durability of pericardial versus porcine aortic valves

OBJECTIVES

This study compares the long-term performance of the Carpentier-Edwards (CE) porcine bioprosthesis and the CE pericardial bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement (AVR).

BACKGROUND

With new bioprostheses on the horizon, there is renewed interest in how the long-term durability of current pericardial bioprostheses compares with the traditional porcine bioprosthesis.

METHODS

We reviewed 518 AVR with CE porcine valves from 1974 to 1996 and 1,021 AVR with CE pericardial valves from 1991 to 2002. The age distribution and clinical profiles were similar for both groups. The total (mean) follow-up was 3,322 (6.4) years for porcine and 2,556 (2.5) years for pericardial.

RESULTS

Long-term mortality was similar (p = 0.29) for porcine and pericardial, with 10-year survival rates of 34 +/- 2% and 38 +/- 6%, respectively. Ten-year freedom from major adverse cardiac events was also similar for both (respectively): thromboembolism (80 +/- 2% and 87 +/- 2%; p = 0.24); endocarditis (98 +/- 1% and 99 +/- 1%; p = 0.30). However, 10-year freedom from explant was lower for porcine (90 +/- 2%) than for pericardial (97 +/- 1%, p = 0.04). Reasons for explant for porcine were structural valve deterioration (SVD) (n = 25), endocarditis (n = 4), and periprosthetic leak (n = 2). The reasons for explant for pericardial were SVD (n = 4), endocarditis (n = 4) and periprosthetic leak (n = 1).

CONCLUSIONS

The current CE pericardial valve offers better midterm durability than the traditional CE porcine valve. Its freedom from SVD and reoperation makes it our current bioprosthesis of choice for AVR in appropriately selected patients.

Thromboembolic events after aortic valve replacement in elderly patients with a Carpentier-Edwards Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis

OBJECTIVES

Thromboembolic events after aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthesis were the most frequently occurring complications in elderly patients. Whether this was valve related or dependent on other factors needed further exploration.

METHODS

Five hundred patients with a median age of 73 years were followed retrospectively after aortic valve replacement with a pericardial prosthesis for occurrence of thromboembolism. Of these, 348 also underwent coronary artery bypass grafting. Twenty-five factors were investigated for their potential effect by using univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis revealed 6 significant factors: preoperative endocarditis (P =.0001), preoperative cerebrovascular accident (P =.002), use of postoperative warfarin sodium (Coumadin, DuPont Merck; P =.006), arterial hypertension (P =.023), size of valve prosthesis of 27 mm or larger (P =.023), and hospital thromboembolism (P =.040). There was a trend toward increased fatal thromboembolism in patients without medication. With a multivariate analysis, 4 factors remained significant: preoperative cerebrovascular accident (risk ratio, 4.8; P =.0016), warfarin sodium (risk ratio, 3.0; P =.0028), preoperative endocarditis (risk ratio, 5.6; P =.006), and hospital thromboembolism (risk ratio, 6.1; P =.016). Hypertension had a borderline effect. Age, sex, diabetes, 4 coronary artery factors, 3 other valvular factors, atrial fibrillation, and carotid artery disease had no significant effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Some emboli seemed triggered by the valve prosthesis. A proper anticoagulant protocol but also a treatment of hypertension is important in the prevention of thromboembolism after aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthesis. We did not find a significant role of atrial fibrillation and carotid artery disease.

Ten-year echocardiographic and clinical follow-up of aortic Carpentier-Edwards pericardial and supraannular prosthesis: a case-match study

BACKGROUND

There are little comparative data on Carpentier-Edwards supraannular and pericardial second-generation bioprostheses. The aim of this work was to compare their hemodynamic and clinical outcomes in patients with aortic stenosis.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study including 150 patients operated on for aortic stenosis between 1989 and 1993. Patients undergoing aortic valve replacement with either a Carpentier-Edwards supraannular or pericardial prosthesis were matched for sex (49% male), age (72 +/- 8 years), body surface area, valve size, associated procedures, and left ventricular ejection fraction.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 6.5 +/- 3.3 years, giving a total follow-up of 983 patient-years. Thirty-day mortality and 10-year actuarial survival were, respectively, 8% and 51% in the supraannular group and 6.7% and 43.4% in the pericardial group. At 10 years, freedom from thromboembolism, structural failure, and all valve-related events were, respectively, 88.7%, 88.9%, and 68.7% in the supraannular group and 85%, 100%, and 82.2% in the pericardial group. There were four (5.3%) structural failures, and four (5.3%) reoperations for degeneration (n = 3) and endocarditis (n = 1) in the supraannular group. Freedom from structural dysfunction or reoperation was 87.3% in the supraannular group and 100% (p < 0.05) in the pericardial group. Echocardiographic review of 62 of 76 survivors (81.5%) demonstrated a trend toward a better hemodynamic profile of pericardial valves at the end of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Ten years after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis, Carpentier-Edwards pericardial prostheses give comparable and probably better results than Carpentier-Edwards supraannular prostheses.

Late hemodynamic and clinical outcomes of aortic valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term clinical and hemodynamic outcomes after aortic valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount bioprosthesis (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, Calif), which has been used in our institution since 1984.

METHODS

From January 1984 to December 1995, the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis was used for aortic valve replacement in 254 patients (male/female ratio 117:137) with a mean age of 71 years (range 25-87 years). Before the operation, 216 patients (85%) were in New York Heart Association functional class III or IV. The predominant diagnosis was aortic stenosis (n = 219, 86%). Associated surgical procedures included coronary artery bypass grafting in 130 cases (51%), mitral valve replacement in 11 cases (4%), and tricuspid or mitral valve repair in 12 cases (5%). Previous cardiac operations had been performed in 36 cases (14%). Follow-up was 100% complete at a mean of 60 +/- 31 months. Univariate estimates of time-related cumulative probabilities were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable adjustment was performed by Cox proportional hazards regression. Echocardiography was performed in 61% of long-term survivors.

RESULTS

There were 11 early deaths (4%) and 58 late deaths. Actuarial survivals at 5, 10, and 12 years were 80% +/- 3%, 50% +/- 8%, and 36% +/- 9%, respectively. At 12 years the freedom from cardiac death was 73% +/- 7%, the freedom from valve-related death was 84% +/- 11%, the freedom from valve reoperation was 83% +/- 9%, the freedom from primary tissue failure was 86% +/- 9%, the freedom from thromboembolism was 67% +/- 13%, and the freedom from endocarditis was 98% +/- 1%. Echocardiography was performed on long-term survivors (mean follow-up 67 +/- 25 months) and showed that transvalvular peak and mean pressure differences measured with Doppler echocardiography were 23.2 +/- 9.6 and 12.3 +/- 4.8 mm Hg, respectively. Aortic regurgitation was found by Doppler echocardiography to be none or trivial, mild, moderate, and severe in 64%, 30%, 3%, and 1% of patients, respectively. Mean left ventricular mass index was 107.2 +/- 35.3 g/m(2) (118.9 +/- 40.2 g/m(2) in men and 98.8 +/- 28.8 g/m(2) in women) at late follow-up. One third of all patients, regardless of sex (n = 26/64 women and n = 14/45 men), had evidence of left ventricular hypertrophy. However, our analyses indicate that the residual left ventricular hypertrophy was not caused by valve mismatch but was probably multifactorial.

CONCLUSION

The Carpentier-Edwards Perimount bioprosthesis has provided satisfactory clinical and hemodynamic outcome. However, at long-term follow-up about one third of the patients being investigated still had left ventricular hypertrophy examined by echocardiography.

A morphologic study of Carpentier-Edwards pericardial xenografts in the mitral position exhibiting primary tissue failure in adults in comparison with Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenografts

OBJECTIVE

We sought to investigate the durability and mechanism of the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial xenograft in the mitral position in comparison with that of the Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenograft.

METHODS

A total of 284 patients who received the Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenograft in the mitral position between 1980 and 1984 and 84 patients who received the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial xenograft in the mitral position between 1984 and 1999 were included in the study. The freedom from reoperation rates for both graft types were determined. For morphologic study, the pathologic findings of 23 valves of 123 explanted Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenografts with structural valve deterioration, nonstructural valve deterioration, or both were determined and compared with those of 20 explanted Carpentier-Edwards pericardial xenografts with structural valve deterioration, nonstructural valve deterioration, or both. Each pathologic finding was graded and assigned a score. Both types were matched for age at reoperation (50-75 years) and duration of valve function (8-11 years).

RESULTS

Freedom from reoperation caused by structural valve deterioration, nonstructural valve deterioration, or both was significantly better for Carpentier-Edwards pericardial xenografts than for Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenografts at 8 years after the operation (Carpentier-Edwards pericardial xenografts: 91.3% vs Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenografts: 71.9%, P =.0061), but it was similar for both types at 12 years (Carpentier-Edwards pericardial xenografts: 43.6% vs Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenografts: 43.6%, P =.2865). No severe leaflet tears were seen among Carpentier-Edwards pericardial xenografts. The mean area percentage of tissue overgrowth was 15.3% in Carpentier-Edwards pericardial xenografts and 3.4% in Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenografts (P =.0001). The mean calcification area percentage was 13.6% in Carpentier-Edwards pericardial xenografts and 31.5% in Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenografts (P =.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Tissue overgrowth on the atrial surface, ventricular surface, or both was the cause of structural valve deterioration, nonstructural valve deterioration, or both of Carpentier-Edwards pericardial xenografts in adults. This was different from Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenograft failure, which resulted from severe calcification and leaflet tears. Organized thrombi on cusps, in addition to valve design, may have contributed to such tissue overgrowth on Carpentier-Edwards pericardial xenografts.

Aortic valve replacement with mechanical and biologic prosthesis in middle-aged patients

BACKGROUND

Mechanical prostheses are used in young patients and bioprostheses in the elderly because of the higher rate of structural failure of bioprostheses. The objective of the present study was to compare results after aortic valve replacement with mechanical (Carbo-Medics) and biologic (Carpentier-Edwards pericardial) in middle-aged patients.

METHODS

Five hundred twenty-one patients, aged between 55 and 65 years, who underwent aortic valve replacement with mechanical (n = 363) or biologic (n = 158) prostheses were reviewed.

RESULTS

The 10-year actuarial survival rate averaged 66%+/-6% in patients implanted with mechanical valves compared with 75%+/-4% in patients implanted with biologic valves (p = 0.2). The 10-year freedom rate from thromboembolism, hemorrhage, and endocarditis averaged 92%+/-7%, 97%+/-2%, and 99%+/-1%, respectively, in patients with mechanical valves compared with 91%+/-3% (p = 0.03), 99%+/-1% (p = 0.4), and 95%+/-2% (p = 0.01), respectively, in those with biologic valves. The 10-year freedom rate from all valve-related complications averaged 90%+/-7% and 83%+/-4%, respectively (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The freedom rate from all valve-related complications was higher among patients with mechanical valves compared with biologic valves 10 years after aortic valve replacement in middle-aged patients.

Performance of 21-mm size perimount aortic bioprosthesis in the elderly

BACKGROUND

Aortic valve replacement in elderly patients with a small aortic annulus may pose difficult problems in terms of prosthesis selection. We have evaluated the hemodynamic performance of the 21-mm Carpentier-Edwards Perimount bioprosthesis implanted in elderly patients.

METHODS

From July 1996 to June 1998, 19 patients (17 women and 2 men, mean age 76+/-4 years and mean body surface area 1.73+/-0.13 m2), had aortic valve replacement with a 21-mm Carpentier-Edwards Perimount bioprosthesis. The hemodynamic performance of the valve was evaluated in 16 patients, who completed at least a 6-month follow-up interval, with transthoracic color-Doppler echocardiography with particular reference to peak and mean transprosthetic gradients, effective orifice area index, and regression of left ventricular mass index.

RESULTS

There were no late deaths and no major postoperative complications. At a mean follow-up of 12+/-7 months, compared to discharge, all patients showed clinical improvement with a significant reduction of peak gradient (from 23+/-4 to 21+/-6 mm Hg, p = 0.04) and left ventricular mass index (from 181+/-23 to 153+/-20 g/m2; p<0.001), whereas mean gradient (from 13+/-3 to 13+/-4 mm Hg, p = not significant) and effective orifice area index (from 1.12+/-0.34 to 1.13+/-0.28 cm2/m2, p = not significant) remained substantially unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a 21-mm Carpentier-Edwards Perimount bioprosthesis is associated with low transprosthetic gradients and significant reduction in left ventricular hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement. The results of our study suggest that a 21-m Carpentier-Edwards Perimount bioprosthesis should be considered a valid option in elderly patients with aortic valve disease and a small aortic annulus.

Structural valve deterioration in mitral replacement surgery: comparison of Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular porcine and perimount pericardial bioprostheses

BACKGROUND

Bioprostheses preserved with glutaraldehyde, both porcine and pericardial, have been available as second-generation prostheses for valve replacement surgery. The performance with regard to structural valve deterioration with the Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular (CE-SAV) porcine bioprosthesis and the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount (CE-P) pericardial bioprosthesis (Baxter Healthcare Corp, Edwards Division, Santa Ana, Calif) was evaluated to determine whether there was a difference in mitral valve replacement.

METHODS

The CE-SAV bioprosthesis was implanted in 1266 overall mitral valve replacements (isolated mitral, 1066; mitral in multiple, 200) and the CE-P bioprosthesis in 429 overall mitral valve replacements (isolated mitral, 328; mitral in multiple, 101). The mean age of the CE-SAV population was 64.2 +/- 12.2 years and that of the CE-P population, 60.7 +/- 11.7 years (P =.0001). For the study, structural valve deterioration was diagnosed at reoperation for explantation.

RESULTS

The freedom from structural valve deterioration was evaluated to 10 years, and the freedom rates reported are at 10 years. For the overall mitral valve replacement groups, the actuarial freedom from deterioration was significant (P =.0001): CE-P > CE-SAV for 40 years or younger, 80% versus 60%; 41 to 50 years, 91% versus 61%; 51 to 60 years, 84% versus 69%; 61 to 70 years, 95% versus 75%. The older than 70-year group was 100% versus 92% (no significant difference). The actual freedom from structural valve deterioration also demonstrated the same pattern at 10 years: 40 years or younger, CE-P 82% versus CE-SAV 68%; 41 to 50 years, 92% versus 70%; 51 to 60 years, 90% versus 80%; 61 to 70 years, 97% versus 88%; and older than 70 years, 100% versus 97%. The independent risk factors of structural valve deterioration for the overall mitral valve replacement group were age and age groups and prosthesis type (CE-SAV > CE-P). The prosthesis type either in isolated replacement or in multiple replacement was not predictive of structural valve deterioration. The pathology of structural valve deterioration was different: 70% of CE-P failures were due to calcification and 57% of CE-SAV failures were due to combined calcification and leaflet tear.

CONCLUSION

The actuarial and actual freedom from structural valve deterioration, diagnosed at reoperation, is greater at 10 years for CE-P than for CE-SAV bioprostheses. The mode of failure is different, and the cause remains obscure. Long-term evaluation is recommended, because the different modes of failure may alter the clinical performance by 15 and 20 years.

Twenty-year follow-up of the Hancock modified orifice porcine aortic valve

BACKGROUND

The entire experience with the Hancock modified orifice porcine bioprosthetic aortic valve from 1976 to 1996 at the Brigham and Women's Hospital has been reviewed. Eight hundred forty-three patients received this valve with a total follow-up of 61,114 months, and a mean follow-up of approximately 72.5 months. There were 490 men and 353 women, and the predominate lesion was aortic stenosis (636 of 843); 365 (43%) patients required a concomitant coronary artery bypass graft operation.

METHODS

Patients were followed prospectively in the Brigham Cardiac Valve Data Registry, and the data were analyzed by the SAS statistical package, using actuarial survival curves and incidence per patient-year of morbidity and mortality.

RESULTS

The overall operative mortality was 45 of 843 (5.3%) with 23 of 478 (4.8%) for isolated aortic valve replacement and 22 of 365 (6.0%) for aortic valve plus coronary artery bypass graft operation. The major morbidity of this valve was structural valve dysfunction, which was significantly related to the age of the patient in whom the valve was placed. Actuarial probability of freedom from structural valve degeneration at 5, 10, and 15 years overall was 99%+/-1%, 79%+/-3% and 57%+/-4%, at 15 years, respectively. In patients younger than 50 years, freedom from structural valve dysfunction was 16%+/-8%, whereas in the age group older than 70 years it was 87%+/-5% (p = 0.0005). Thromboembolism at 10 and 15 years was 81%+/-3% overall, 84%+/-2% in patients in normal sinus rhythm, and 57%+/-13% in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation.

CONCLUSIONS

The Hancock modified orifice aortic valve, despite its more complicated fabrication, has been a reliable porcine bioprosthetic valve and can be used reliably in patients older than 70 years because of its low structural valve degeneration rate, and protection from stroke and anticoagulant hemorrhage in those patients in sinus rhythm.

15-year experience with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to evaluate the late results of the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis, which we have been implanting since 1981.

METHODS

The 812 patients who underwent heart valve replacement with a Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis between 1981 and 1996 were reviewed. Their clinical, operative, and follow-up data were prospectively recorded in a computerized database. All but 29 patients were available for follow-up (96% completeness), which averaged 58 months and totaled 3,000 patient-years.

RESULTS

There were 598 aortic valve replacements (74%), 149 mitral valve replacements (18%), and 65 double valve replacements (8%). The mean age at the time of surgery was 65 years (range, 18 to 88 years), with 24% of the patients under the age of 60 years. Preoperatively, 558 patients (69%) were in New York Heart Association functional class III or IV. Associated surgical procedures included coronary artery bypass grafting in 219 patients (27%) and tricuspid or mitral valve repair in 40 (5%). Previous cardiac operations had been performed in 149 patients, including 134 valve-related procedures. There were 49 early deaths overall (6%): 29 after aortic valve replacement (4.8%), 11 after mitral valve replacement (7.4%), and 9 with double valve replacement (13.8%). There were 120 late deaths for a 10-year actuarial survival rates of 69%+/-3%, 58%+/-7%, and 38%+/-10% for aortic, mitral, and double valve replacement, respectively. The 14-year survival rate for aortic valve replacement patients is 68%+/-3%. The 10-year and 14-year actuarial freedom rates from events after aortic valve replacement are 92% +/-2% and 88%+/-4% for thromboembolism, 96%+/-1% and 92%+/-4 for endocarditis, 91%+/-2 and 72%+/-6% for reoperation, and 93%+/-2% and 80%+/-5% for structural dysfunction of the valve. The 10-year actuarial freedom rates from events after mitral and double valve replacement are 93%+/-3% and 89%+/-4% for thromboembolism, 95%+/-3% and 88%+/-5% for endocarditis, 76%+/-7% and 70%+/-14% for reoperation, and 81%+/-7% and 72%+/-15% for structural dysfunction. No primary tissue failure of the prosthesis in any position was observed in the 357 patients aged 70 years or more at the time of valve implantation.

CONCLUSIONS

The Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve offers excellent clinical results and durability, particularly in the aortic position and for patients older than 70 years of age.

Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis experience in aortic valve replacement > or =60 years of age

BACKGROUND

The Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis (model 11), a second-generation pericardial prosthesis, has clinical performance assessment to 10 years. The authors previously recommended the prosthesis for aortic valve replacement in patients 70 years or older. The purpose of the current assessment is to report on performance in patients 60 years or older undergoing aortic valve replacement.

METHODS

This bioprosthesis was implanted in 161 patients (mean age, 69.5+/-6.3 years; range, 60 to 94 years) with aortic valve replacement from 1982 to 1992. There were 84 patients 60 to 69 years (mean, 64.5+/-3.1 years) and 77 patients 70 years or older (mean, 74.8+/-4.3 years). Of the total population, concomitant procedures were performed in 63 patients (39.1%); of these, coronary artery bypass grafting was performed in 39 (24.2%).

RESULTS

The early mortality was 4.8% (4 patients) for the 60 to 69-year age group and 10.4% (8) for those 70 years or older (not significant). The late mortality was 4.4%/patient-year (27) for those 60 to 69 years and 6.9%/ patient-year (35) for those 70 years or older (not significant). The patient survival for those 60 to 69 years was 58.0%+/-6.3% and for those 70 years or older, 45.3%+/-5.9% at 10 years (p < 0.05). The valve-related mortality for those 60 to 69 years was 0.82%/patient-year (5) and for those 70 years or older, 1.58%/patient-year (8) (not significant). The reoperation rate for those 60 to 69 years was 3.29%/patient-year (20) and for those 70 years or older, 1.0%/patient-year (5) (p < 0.05). The structural valve deterioration rate for those 60 to 69 years was 3.13%/ patient-year (19) and for those 70 years or older, 1.2%/ patient-year (6) (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis remains recommended for aortic valve replacement in patients 70 years and older.

Serial Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve dysfunction: comparison with Ionescu-Shiley valve

BACKGROUND

Doppler echocardiography is a valuable noninvasive method for evaluating of the occurrence and degree of either prosthetic valve stenosis or regurgitation. By using serial Doppler echocardiographic examination, we evaluated the incidence and the mode of the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve (CEPX) dysfunction compared with that of the Ionescu-Shiley valve (IS).

METHODS AND RESULTS

After aortic and/or mitral valve replacement, 80 patients with CEPX and 111 with IS underwent Doppler echocardiography at intervals of at least 2 years after surgery. The average durations of follow-up were 6.1 +/- 2.9 years for patients with CEPX and 7.2 +/- 3.0 years for those with IS. Bioprosthetic valve stenosis was defined as reduced excursion of the bioprosthetic valve leaflets and peak gradient > or =60 mm Hg after aortic valve replacement and mean gradient > or =7 mm Hg after mitral valve replacement. Bioprosthetic valve regurgitation caused by bioprosthetic valve dysfunction was defined as grade > or =3 transvalvular regurgitation. In the aortic position, although there was no significant difference in the actuarial rate of freedom from bioprosthetic valve stenosis between patients with IS and those with CEPX (10 years after surgery, 88% +/- 7% vs 90%, NS), bioprosthetic regurgitation caused by bioprosthetic valve dysfunction occurred less frequently in patients with CEPX than in those with IS (10 years after surgery, 86% vs 54% +/- 9%, p < 0.05). In the mitral position, bioprosthetic valve stenosis occurred more frequently in patients with CEPX than in those with IS (10 years after surgery, 54% +/- 11% vs 72% +/- 8%, p < 0.01). Although grade > or =3 transvalvular bioprosthetic regurgitation occurred later in patients with CEPX than in those with IS, there was no significant difference in the actuarial rate of freedom from that regurgitation between patients with CEPX and those with IS (10 years after surgery, 63% +/- 10% vs 54% +/- 7%, NS).

CONCLUSIONS

For aortic valve replacement, CEPX has good long-term durability because of the low incidence of bioprosthetic regurgitation. For mitral valve replacement, long-term durability of CEPX is poor, although medium-term durability is satisfactory.