Changes in salbutamol concentration in the reservoir solution of a jet nebulizer

What makes flunisolide different among inhaled corticosteroids used for nebulization: a close look at the role of aqueous solubility

Evidence-based management of bronchial asthma and wheezing in children and adults recommends the employment of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs). Difficulty in using some inhalation devices for ICS delivery, such as pressurized metered-dose and dry-powder inhalers, is common among young children and in the elderly, and for that reason, they are replaced with nebulizers. We reviewed comparative studies that evaluated funisolide with other ICSs currently available on the market, including beclomethasone dipropionate, fluticasone propionate, and budesonide. Moreover, we assessed the physicochemical properties of these ICSs in determining drug fate in the lung. Data indicate that the flunisolide output in respirable particles by any type of pneumatic nebulizer (traditional, open breath or breathenhanced) is superior to the output of other ICSs. This is principally attributed to the higher water solubility of flunisolide. Furthermore, in vivo simulation studies demonstrate that the intersubject variability of the inhaled dose among asthmatic children was much greater for suspensions of fluticasone propionate and beclomethasone dipropionate than for those of flunisolide. The physicochemical properties and pharmacokinetic profile of flunisolide favor its employment in nebulization.

In vitro comparison of five nebulizers during noninvasive ventilation: analysis of inhaled and lost doses

BACKGROUND

Few studies on performance comparison of nebulizer systems coupled with a single-limb circuit bilevel ventilator are available. Most of these data compared the aerosol drug delivery for only two different systems. Using an adult lung bench model of noninvasive ventilation, we compared inhaled and lost doses of three nebulizer systems coupled with a single-limb circuit bilevel ventilator, as well as the influence of the nebulizer position.

METHOD

Three vibrating mesh nebulizers (Aeroneb(®) Pro, Aeroneb(®) Solo, and NIVO(®)), one jet nebulizer (Sidestream(®)), and one ultrasonic nebulizer (Servo Ultra Nebulizer 145(®)) coupled with a bilevel ventilator were tested. They were charged with amikacin solution (500 mg/4 mL) and operated at two different positions: before and after the exhalation port (starting from the lung). The inhaled dose, the expiratory wasted dose, and the estimated lost dose were assessed by the residual gravimetric method.

RESULTS

The doses varied widely among the nebulizer types and position. When the nebulizer was positioned before the exhalation port, the vibrating mesh nebulizer delivered the highest inhaled dose (p<0.001), the jet nebulizer the highest expiratory wasted dose (p<0.001), and the ultrasonic device the highest total lost dose (p<0.001). When the nebulizer was positioned after the exhalation port, the vibrating mesh nebulizers delivered the highest inhaled (p<0.001) and expiratory wasted doses (p<0.001), and the ultrasonic device the highest total lost dose (p<0.001). The most efficient nebulizers were NIVO and Aeroneb Solo when placed before the exhalation port.

CONCLUSIONS

In a single-limb circuit bilevel ventilator, vibrating mesh nebulizers positioned between the exhalation port and lung model are more efficient for drug delivery compared with jet or ultrasonic nebulizers. In this position, the improved efficiency of vibrating mesh nebulizers was due to an increase in the inhaled dose and a reduction in the exhaled wasted dose compared with placement between the ventilator and the expiratory port. Because of the high total lost dose, the ultrasonic device should not be recommended. Nebulizer placement before the exhalation port increased the inhaled dose and decreased the expiratory wasted dose, except for the jet nebulizer.

Relief of incident dyspnea in palliative cancer patients: a pilot, randomized, controlled trial comparing nebulized hydromorphone, systemic hydromorphone, and nebulized saline

Acute episodic breathlessness in patients receiving palliative care is a distressing symptom with little evidence-base to inform management. This pilot, double-blind, controlled, crossover study compared the effects of nebulized hydromorphone, systemic hydromorphone and nebulized saline for the relief of episodic breathlessness in advanced cancer patients. On three occasions of acute breathlessness, patients randomly received either nebulized hydromorphone, a systemic breakthrough dose of hydromorphone or nebulized saline together with a blinding agent. Breathlessness was scored before and 10, 20, 30, and 60 minutes post-treatment completion using a 100 mm visual analog scale. Twenty patients completed the trial. Ratings did not differ significantly across pretest treatments. Change in ratings from pretest to 10 minutes after completion of nebulization (about 20 minutes after administration of systemic hydromorphone) indicated that each of the treatments resulted in statistically significant improvements in breathlessness, with no significant differences between treatments. Over time, breathlessness decreased significantly for all treatments, with no significant differences between treatments. Only nebulized hydromorphone produced a rapid improvement in breathlessness that reached a magnitude considered to be clinically important. Interpretation of these results is considered in relation to our definition of clinical significance, the dose of hydromorphone used and the possibility of a placebo effect. This study can serve to inform the design of future trials to investigate the management of incident breathlessness.

Dyspnea Management in Lung Cancer: Applying the Evidence From Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

To provide an overview of mechanisms of dyspnea and causes of dyspnea in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and lung cancer and to critically review current pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic management of dyspnea for COPD and lung cancer.

DATA SOURCES

Published articles, abstracts, textbooks, and the authors' personal experiences with dyspnea management in COPD and lung cancer.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The causes of dyspnea in cancer are more varied than the causes of dyspnea in COPD; however, many are similar, thus providing the justification for recommending best practice from COPD research to be used in lung cancer. Dyspnea in both diseases is treated by corticosteroids, bronchodilators, antianxiety drugs, local anesthetics, and oxygen. However, when dyspnea is severe, morphine is the first choice. Using specific breathing techniques, positioning, energy conservation, exercise, and some dietary modifications and nutrient supplements can help with dyspnea management.

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic management of dyspnea in COPD can be applied to dyspnea related to lung cancer. Further research in the management of dyspnea in lung cancer is required, particularly controlled studies with larger sample sizes, to determine the effectiveness of the application of COPD dyspnea management in lung cancer.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

Previous studies provide a guideline for applying dyspnea management for COPD to cancer. The theoretical frameworks used in previous studies can be modified for conducting further study.

Use of inhaler devices in pediatric asthma

Inhalation is the preferred route for asthma therapy, since it offers a rapid onset of drug action, requires smaller doses, and reduces systemic effects compared with other routes of administration. Unfortunately, inhalation devices are frequently used in an empirical manner rather than on evidence-based awareness.A wide variety of nebulizers are available. Conventional jet nebulizers are highly inefficient, as much of the aerosol is wasted during exhalation. However, incorporating an extra open vent into the system has considerably increased the amount of drug that patients receive. Breath-assisted open vent nebulizers limit the loss of aerosol during exhalation, but are dependent on the patient's inspiratory flow. Ultrasonic nebulizers produce a high mass output and have a short nebulization time, but are inefficient for delivering suspensions or viscous solutions. Adaptive aerosol delivery devices release a precise dose that is tailored to the individual patient's breathing pattern. Nebulizers have several drawbacks, and their use should be limited to patients who cannot correctly manage other devices.Pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDI) are practical, cheap and multidose. However, there are several problems with their use. Breath-actuated MDI are easy to use and can be activated by very low flow. However, young children may not be able to use them efficiently. Dry powder inhalers (DPI) are portable and easy to use. They are indicated either for rescue bronchodilator therapy or for regular treatment with inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting bronchodilators. The use of spacers reduces oropharyngeal deposition and improves drug delivery to the lung. Spacers do not require patient coordination, but some general rules must be followed for their optimal use.Thus, the choice of a delivery device mainly depends on the age of the patient, the drug to be administered and the condition to be treated. Proper education is also essential when prescribing an inhalation device.

Accounting for radioactivity before and after nebulization of tobramycin to insure accuracy of quantification of lung deposition

The ability to predict drug deposition of inhaled drugs used in cystic fibrosis (CF) is important if there is a need to target specific doses of drug to the lungs of individual patients. The gold standard of measuring pulmonary deposition is the quantification of an aerosolized radiolabel either mixed with the drug solution or tagged directly to the compound of interest. Accuracy of the quantification could be assured if there is agreement between the amount of radioactivity before and after administration. Before administration, the radiolabel is concentrated in the well of the nebulizer, whereas after administration, it is distributed throughout the nebulizer, the expiratory filter and connectors, and the upper airway, stomach, trachea, and lung. Not only is the geometry of the distribution that is presented to the gamma camera different, but there are different attenuation factors for the various body tissues. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the quantification of deposition. Secondary goals were to compare in vitro nebulizer performance with that measured in vivo during the deposition study. Eighty milligrams of tobramycin and technetium bound to human serum albumin was administered to 10 normal adults using a Pari LC Jet Plus (Pari Respiratory Equipment, Inc., Richmond, VA) breath-enhanced nebulizer. Techniques were developed that allowed for the accounting of 99 +/- 2% of the initial radioactivity. The fraction of the rate of lung deposition to total body deposition was the in vivo respirable fraction (0.62 +/- 0.07), which closely agreed with in vitro measurements of respirable fraction (0.62 +/- 0.04). Drug output measured from the change in weight and concentration in the nebulizer systematically overestimated drug output measured by the deposition study. The results indicate that 11.8 of the initial 80 mg would be deposited in the lungs. This technique could be adapted to accurately quantify the amount of deposition on any inhaled therapeutic agent, but caution must be used when extrapolating performance of a nebulizer on the bench to expected deposition in patients.

Nebulizer choice for inhaled colistin treatment in cystic fibrosis

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To develop practical ways of nebulizing colistin by determining the rate of drug output, total drug output, and particle-size distribution of two commercially available jet nebulizers, the disposable Hudson 1730 Updraft II (Hudson Respiratory Care; Temecula, CA) and the reusable Pari LC Star breath-enhanced nebulizer (Pari Respiratory Equipment; Midlothian, VA).

METHODS

The nebulizers contained colistin, 75 mg, in 4 mL of isotonic solution. Particle-size distribution was measured by helium-neon laser diffraction, allowing calculation of the respirable fraction (RF), the mass of aerosol comprised of droplets < 5 microm.

RESULTS

The mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) total rate of output of the Updraft II was 2.6 mg/min (2.0, 3.1; n = 4) with 1.3 mg/min (1.0, 1.5) mg/min within the RF. The rate of output of the LC Star increased in a quadratic relationship to the inspiratory flow, delivering 1.8 mg/min (0.7, 2.0; n = 4) with 1.4 mg/min (1.3, 1.6) within the RF, and 6.2 mg/min (5.6, 6.8) with 5.3 mg/min (4.8, 5.7) within the RF, at 0 L/min and 20 L/min inspiratory flows, respectively. Efficiency, as the rate of expected pulmonary deposition divided by rate of total output, was then calculated. The LC Star estimated 56% (51, 61) efficiency, with pulmonary delivery of 29% (26, 32) of the charge of the nebulizer, compared to the Updraft II at 22% (22, 23) efficiency and expected pulmonary deposition of 10% (10, 10) of the dose.

CONCLUSIONS

Colistin can be successfully nebulized with both nebulizers tested. This study provides an estimate of in vivo efficiency and expected pulmonary deposition that may be used in future trials.

Characterization of heparin aerosols generated in jet and ultrasonic nebulizers

Inhaled heparin has been used for asthma treatment, but results have been inconsistent, probably due to highly varying lung doses. We determined the output per unit time and the particle size distributions of sodium heparin, calcium heparin, and low molecular weight (LMW) heparin formulations in five concentrations from Sidestream jet nebulizers (Medic-Aid, Bognor Regis, England) and an Ultraneb 2000 ultrasonic nebulizer (DeVilbiss, Langen, Germany). We also determined the inhaled mass and the estimated respirable mass for some combinations. For the jet nebulizer, output per minute increased with increasing concentration and flow rate, and particle size decreased from 3.64 to 2.01 microns (mass median diameter [MMD]). The percentage of particles less than 3 microns ranged from 41% to 74%. For the ultrasonic nebulizer, maximum output per minute was achieved at a concentration of 7000 i.u./mL; this maximum depended upon the viscosity and temperature of the solution. MMD was independent of formulation, temperature, or concentration and ranged from 5.61 to 7.03 microns. Sodium heparin/calcium heparin in a concentration of 20,000 i.u./mL in the jet nebulizer driven at 10 L/min produced the highest dose of heparin capable of reaching the lower respiratory tract. Mass balance was determined for these combinations with the jet nebulizer run until visible aerosol generation ceased. Of a loading dose of 80,000 i.u. of heparin, 45,000 i.u. remained in the dead space of the nebulizer, 20,000 i.u. was deposited on the exhalation filter, and 15,000 i.u. was captured on the inhalation filter (inhaled mass). This corresponds to a respirable mass of 10,000 i.u. of heparin with a high probability of reaching the lower respiratory tract in normal healthy adults.

Four hours of continuous albuterol nebulization

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Continuous albuterol nebulization (CAN) is a therapeutic modality available to treat status asthmaticus. Currently, CAN may be administered using a large-volume nebulizer (LVN) or a small-volume nebulizer attached to an infusion pump or refilled as needed. Few data are available regarding the reproducibility of aerosol characteristics during CAN. In this study, we determined the aerodynamic profile, drug output (DO), DO in respirable range (RD), solution output (SO), and changes in reservoir's albuterol concentration (AR) hourly during 4 hours of CAN.

DESIGN

A modified Puritan-Bennett 1600 jet nebulizer was tested with a large reservoir (LR; 250 mL), medium reservoir (MR; 45 mL), and small reservoir with infusion pump (SRP; 18 mL). We used 100-, 40-, and 4-mL initial fill volumes (with 10-mL/h infusion for SRP) of 1 mg/mL albuterol solution for the LR, MR, and SRP, respectively. Particle size distribution and DO consistency were determined by impaction and spectrophotometric analysis (275 nm). We also determined albuterol mass output. The SO was determined by gravimetric technique.

RESULTS

The PBsj produced a heterodisperse aerosol with a median mass aerodynamic diameter range of 1.8 to 2.2 microm. DO and RD paralleled SO. The LR had the highest SO, DO, and RD (8.03+/-2.36 vs 5.73+/-2.48 and 5.85+/-0.51 mg/h for MR and SRP, respectively). The AR showed no statistically significant changes.

CONCLUSIONS

The PBsj demonstrated consistent and adequate aerosol production during 4 hours of CAN. These bench data support the widespread use of a LVN for CAN.

Nebulized morphine in the palliation of dyspnoea

Seventeen terminally ill cancer patients with primary or secondary intrathoracic malignancy complaining of breathlessness were treated with nebulized morphine in doses of 20 mg 4-hourly for 48 h. The effect on dyspnoea was evaluated using the Dyspnoea Assessment Questionnaire. Most patients felt less dyspnoeic after 24 h; the effect was maintained, but not improved upon, after 48 h.

The choice of jet nebulizer, nebulizing flow, and addition of albuterol affects the output of tobramycin aerosols

The use of inhaled antibiotics in the treatment of cystic fibrosis has become widespread despite controversy in the literature as to the appropriate dosing regimen and its effectiveness. This study compared two tobramycin (T) preparations (one with and one without the addition of albuterol) using two different jet nebulizers in order to determine if drug output would be affected. Using calibrated flows from a dry compressed gas source of 6 and 8 L/min as well as a specific compressor (Pulmo-Aide), the Hudson 1720 nebulizer was compared with the newer disposable Hudson 1730. The albuterol preparation used in this study was the Ventolin (albuterol) Respirator Solution (VRS). The nebulizers were charged with (1) 2 mL T (80 mg/2 mL) with 0.5 mL VRS (5 mg/mL) and normal saline solution to make the total nebulizer charge of 3 or 4 mL, or (2) 2 mL T and either 1 or 2 mL normal saline solution. A laser diffraction analyzer (Malvern 2600) was used to determine the aerosol particle size distribution. From the distribution, the respirable fraction, which is the fraction of aerosol that could enter and remain in the lungs, was calculated. For all solutions and each particular flow, the Hudson 1730 had a larger respirable fraction of T. The addition of VRS lowered the surface tension of the solution in the nebulizer and resulted in a greater output of T. This effect was most apparent for the 3-mL volume fills of the Hudson 1720. The greatest differences were between the 3-mL nebulizer charges of T using the Hudson 1720 driven by a flow of 6 L/min, which produced 8 mg of T in the respirable fraction, compared with 35 mg produced by the Hudson 1730 driven by a flow of 8 L/min. These results suggest that different nebulizers, different nebulizer solutions, and different techniques of nebulization may result in very different amounts of T aerosol output in the respirable fraction.

A comparison of pulmonary availability between Ventolin (albuterol) nebules and Ventolin (albuterol) Respirator Solution

The two most common albuterol preparations used for nebulization are: (1) Ventolin (albuterol) respirator solution (Glaxo Canada Inc; Montreal, Canada) of which 2.5 mg (0.5 mL) is diluted with 2 mL of normal saline solution, and (2) the preservative-free, prediluted Ventolin (albuterol) Nebules PF (Glaxo) (2.5 mg/2.5 mL). The two preparations were compared using both a Hudson 1720 "T" up-draft Neb-U-Mist jet nebulizer and a Hudson 1730 "T" up-draft Neb-U-Mist II jet nebulizer (Hudson; Temecula, Calif), which were driven by a compressor (Pulmo-Aide; Devilbiss; Somerset, Pa) and by dry compressed air at 6 and 8 L/min. Particle size distribution was measured with a particle sizer (Malvern 2600; Malvern Instruments; Malvern, UK) and drug output for the nebulizer was calculated from the differences in predrug and postdrug volume and concentration. Drug availability was defined as the amount of drug carried in particles less than 5 microns in diameter. Drug availability was greater with the albuterol respiratory solution, due to the surface activity of the preservative benzalkonium chloride, for both nebulizers but particularly for the 1720. Differences in drug availability between nebulizers exceeded fourfold depending on the preparation, the nebulizer, and the nebulizing flow. These differences could not have been predicted from the manufacturer's specifications. The results suggest that prediction of drug availability must be based on measurements with the specific preparation and the specific nebulizer used.

Medication nebulizer performance. Effects of diluent volume, nebulizer flow, and nebulizer brand

BACKGROUND

Medication nebulizers are commonly used to delivery aerosolized medications to patients with respiratory disease. We evaluated output and respirable aerosol available to the patient (inhaled mass) for 17 medication nebulizers using a spontaneous breathing lung model.

METHODS

Three nebulizer fill volumes (3, 4, and 5 mL containing 2.5 mg of albuterol) and 3 oxygen flows (6, 8, and 10 L/min) were evaluated using the 17 nebulizers. A cotton plug at the nebulizer mouthpiece was used to trap aerosol during simulated spontaneous breathing. Following each trial, the amount of albuterol remaining in the nebulizer and the amount deposited in the cotton plug were determined spectrophotometrically. Aerosol particle size was determined using an 11-stage cascade impactor.

RESULTS

Increasing fill volume decreased the amount of albuterol trapped in the dead volume (p < 0.001) and increased the amount delivered to the patient (p < 0.001). Increasing flow increased the mass output of particles in the respirable range of 1 to 5 microns (p = 0.004), but the respirable mass delivered to the patient was affected to a greater extent by nebulizer brand (p < 0.001) than flow. Although 2.5 mg of albuterol was placed into the nebulizers, less than 0.5 mg in the respirable range of 1 to 5 microns was delivered to the mouthpiece.

CONCLUSIONS

The performance of medication nebulizers is affected by fill volume, flow, and nebulizer brand. When they are used for research applications, the nebulizer characteristics must be evaluated and reported for the conditions used in the investigation.

Inhalers and nebulizers: which to choose and why

It is obvious that many factors should be considered when an inhaler is prescribed. Based upon the information discussed above, a rational inhaler strategy could be as follows: (1) Children < or = 5 years and elderly patients are prescribed a spacer with a valve system (and a face mask for the children) for the delivery of all drugs. When they are severely obstructed, some may need a nebulizer. If the patient cannot be taught the correct use of a spacer, a nebulizer should be prescribed. (2) Children > or = 5 years and adults are prescribed a spacer or a Turbuhaler for the administration of inhaled corticosteroids and a dry powder inhaler (preferably multiple dose) or a breath-actuated MDI for other drugs. If these alternatives are not available or the patient prefers, a conventional MDI can be used (preferably not for other corticosteroids than fluticasone propionate) provided that careful tuition is given. Fluticasone dipropionate may be given by DPI, Spacer or MDI. (3) Nebulizers are mainly reserved for severe acute attacks of bronchoconstriction. With this approach, most patients can be taught effective inhaler use with a minimum of instructional time. Finally, it must always be remembered to consider the patient's wish, since prescription of an inhaler which the physician likes but the patient does not is likely to reduce compliance.

Optimal duration of nebulized albuterol therapy

The output from a jet nebulizer was analyzed for aerosol profile, solution output, and delivery of albuterol at three different initial volume fills to determine the changes that occur during the course of nebulization. Increasing diluent volume led to significantly greater delivery of the albuterol initially placed in the nebulizer. Albuterol delivery from the nebulizer ceased completely following the onset of inconsistent nebulization (sputtering) as determined audibly and by laser particle analysis. Aerosol output rate declined by one-half within 20 s of the onset of sputtering. The albuterol concentration in the nebulizer solution increased significantly once the aerosol output declined. The weight of solution delivered as determined by change in weight of the nebulizer could not be fully accounted for as aerosol volume. It appeared that this discrepancy represented loss of water by evaporation. Aerosolization past the point of initial jet nebulizer sputtering is unproductive.

Salbutamol output from two jet nebulizers

Nebulized bronchodilators are commonly used in the management of patients with airflow obstruction, although there is little information available on the bronchodilator output from the nebulizer unit. We have examined the fluid and salbutamol outputs of a single jet nebulizer from two commercial manufacturers at 1 min intervals up to 12 min. The drug and fluid output continued throughout the study period, with a greater fluid output leading to an increase in the concentration of salbutamol remaining within the nebulizer unit. This suggests that weight change is not a good indicator of drug output. Furthermore, there was a marked difference in peak salbutamol output between the two nebulizer units, being 2.9 mg (55%) with the Micro-Neb unit and 1.98 mg (38.7%) with the System 22 unit.

Inhaled nebulised fentanyl for postoperative analgesia

The effects of three concentrations of inhaled nebulised fentanyl citrate solution given for postoperative pain relief were studied. Each of 30 patients inhaled one dose of 3 ml of solution nebulised over 9 min. A combined analysis of pain relief, time to further analgesia and effect on respiratory frequency showed the highest concentration (318 micrograms/ml fentanyl base) to be more effective (p less than 0.01) than the two lower concentrations (159 micrograms/ml and 64 micrograms/ml) which were indistinguishable from each other. There were no major side effects. This study provides evidence for the efficacy and safety of inhaled fentanyl for postoperative analgesia. Estimation of the delivered doses did not support the hypothesis that fentanyl is more effective by this route compared with other parenteral routes. Further studies are required to improve the method of delivery and investigate the pharmacodynamic features of this technique.

Nebulization of liposomes. II. The effects of size and modeling of solute release profiles

A series of carboxyfluorescein (CF)-containing multilamellar vesicle (MLV) dispersions was prepared and extruded through polycarbonate membranes ranging in size from 0.2 to 5 microns. Vesicle dispersions were nebulized for 80 min using a Collison nebulizer, and the release of CF was monitored during nebulization. Solute retention was dependent upon the size of the vesicles and leakage ranged from 7.9 +/- 0.4% (N = 3) for vesicles extruded through 0.2-microns filters to 76.8 +/- 5.9% (N = 3) for liposomes that were not filtered. Solute release profiles obtained over greater than or equal to 420-min nebulization periods conformed to a two-compartment kinetic model and exhibited a "fast" initial phase (k1 = 0.052 +/- 0.0043) followed by a "slow" terminal phase (k2 = 0.0034 +/- 0.00018). The results show that CF retention can be increased by nebulizing small vesicles and modeling suggests that the rate of CF leakage from the bilayers is faster than from the core of the liposomes.

Jet and ultrasonic nebuliser output: use of a new method for direct measurement of aerosol output

Output from jet nebulisers is calibrated traditionally by weighing them before and after nebulisation, but the assumption that the weight difference is a close measure of aerosol generation could be invalidated by the concomitant process of evaporation. A method has been developed for measuring aerosol output directly by using a solute (fluoride) tracer and aerosol impaction, and this has been compared with the traditional weight loss method for two Wright, six Turbo, and four Micro-Cirrus jet nebulisers and two Microinhaler ultrasonic nebulisers. The weight loss method overestimated true aerosol output for all jet nebulisers. The mean aerosol content, expressed as a percentage of the total weight loss, varied from as little as 15% for the Wright jet nebulisers to 54% (range 45-61%) for the Turbo and Micro-Cirrus jet nebulisers under the operating conditions used. In contrast, there was no discrepancy between weight loss and aerosol output for the ultrasonic nebulisers. These findings, along with evidence of both concentrating and cooling effects from jet nebulisation, confirm that total output from jet nebulisers contains two distinct fractions, vapour and aerosol. The vapour fraction, but not the aerosol fraction, was greatly influenced by reservoir temperature within the nebuliser; so the ratio of aerosol output to total weight loss varied considerably with temperature. It is concluded that weight loss is an inappropriate method of calibrating jet nebuliser aerosol output, and that this should be measured directly.

In vitro comparison of DeVilbiss jet and ultrasonic nebulizers

Output, droplet size (by laser instrument), and nebulization time have been compared in vitro for eight individual ultrasonic nebulizers (DeVilbiss Pulmosonic) and eight individual jet nebulizers (DeVilbiss 646), the latter operated by compressed air at flows of 6 and 12 L/min. A solution of hypertonic (7 percent) saline was nebulized. The ultrasonic nebulizer retained a higher "dead" volume of solution on completion of nebulization (p less than 0.05), but the increase in saline concentration was less marked than for the jet (p less than 0.01). The mass of NaCl released as aerosol was similar for the ultrasonic and for the jet at 6 L/min but was increased for the jet at 12 L/min (p less than 0.05). There was a fivefold interindividual variation in output for the ultrasonic. Droplet mass median diameters for the ultrasonic (mean 5.4 micron) were slightly lower than those for the jet at 6 L/min (mean 6.0 micron, p less than 0.05) but were higher than those for the jet at 12 L/min (mean 3.7 micron, p less than 0.01). The ultrasonic emitted virtually no droplets less than 2 micron diameter and may be unsuitable for applications requiring high yields of fine particles for delivery to the peripheral lung regions.

Hypoxaemia in wheezy infants after bronchodilator treatment

The response of the bronchi to nebulised salbutamol was measured in five recurrently wheezy infants. Changes in oxygenation (measured by pulse oximeter and transcutaneous PO2 electrodes) and carbon dioxide (measured by transcutaneous PCO2 electrode) were recorded at the same time. Neither nebulised saline nor salbutamol caused any changes in the measurements of airway function. A significant drop in mean oxygen saturation of 2% and of transcutaneous oxygen tension of 1.3 kPa occurred after nebulised salbutamol. No significant change occurred in measurements of transcutaneous carbon dioxide tension, nor was there any significant change in any of these measurements after 2.5 ml of nebulised saline had been given as a control. These results suggest that nebulised salbutamol may cause significant hypoxaemia, in wheezy infants probably by inducing ventilation/perfusion disturbance.