Analysis of 24-hour esophageal pressure and pH data in unselected patients with noncardiac chest pain

The relationship between manometric subtype and symptom details in achalasia

BACKGROUND

Although dysphagia and chest pain are the two most common symptoms in patients with achalasia, the mechanism of evoking symptoms is still unknown. The aim of this study was to reveal the relationship between symptoms and the subtypes of achalasia defined by the Chicago classification.

METHODS

A total of 71consecutive patients with newly diagnosed achalasia were enrolled between March 2009 and December 2017. Esophageal motility was assessed by high-resolution manometry (HRM) with the Chicago classification v 3.0. and esophagograms. Their symptoms were evaluated with structured self-reported questionnaires focused on dysphagia and chest pain. Symptom profiles and radiographic findings according to the manometric subtypes were investigated.

RESULTS

Among the total 71 patients, 69 patients (97%) had dysphagia and 39 patients (54%) had chest pain. Regarding dysphagia, type II patients reported dysphagia in the throat the most, while types I and III patients mostly felt it in the epigastrium. Type II patients often felt dysphagia at the time of swallowing (41%), but this was reported in only 8.7% of Type I and 33% of Type III patients (p = 0.02). Concerning chest pain, Type I patients rarely had pain during meals (14%), but more often while sleeping (43%) and in early morning (43%), while type III patients often had pain during meals (67%). Type III patients reported that solid food caused pain more often than other types (I/II/III 0/10/33%, p = 0.09).

CONCLUSIONS

Detailed symptoms of achalasia, such as its site and timing, varied by subtypes. The status of the esophageal body might induce those differences in symptoms.

The role of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal manometry in clinical practice

High-resolution manometry revolutionized the assessment of esophageal motility disorders and upgraded the classification through the Chicago Classification. A known disadvantage of standard HRM, however, is the inability to record esophageal motility function for an extended time interval; therefore, it represents only a more snapshot view of esophageal motor function. In contrast, ambulatory esophageal manometry measures esophageal motility over a prolonged period and detects motor activity during the entire circadian cycle. Furthermore, ambulatory manometry has the ability to measure temporal correlations between symptoms and motor events. This article aimed to review the clinical implications of ambulatory esophageal manometry for various symptoms, covering literature on the manometry catheter, interpretation of findings, and relevance in clinical practice specific to the evaluation of non-cardiac chest pain, chronic cough, and rumination syndrome.

Symptom association latency during ambulatory reflux monitoring: a review of 1445 symptoms

To determine the optimal time window of symptom association in GERD patient, a 2-minute time window is nonapplicable for all gastroesophageal reflux (GERD) symptoms and 5 minutes remains an arbitrary choice. Symptom association analysis is a critical component in pH-impedance (imp) testing. Symptom index (SI) and symptom association probability (SAP) are the two widely accepted methods. Both were introduced in the preimpedance era and initially tested in patients with typical GERD symptoms. We reviewed ambulatory pH-imp studies of (294) patients referred for evaluation of possible GERD symptoms from January 2012 to August 2015. Patients with heartburn (HB), regurgitation (Reg), cough, and throat clearing (TC) alone or in combination were reviewed. The analysis time windows were separated into five intervals (0-1, 1-2, 2-3, 3-4, 4-5 minutes) to explore the frequency of symptom occurrence in each window. The SI was then calculated and contrasted to the usual 5-minute window; similar calculations were made to SAP 2-minute windows. Secondary analysis was performed to test whether symptoms due to acid reflux have a different time perception than non-acid. Overall, there were 1445 total symptoms preceded by impedance detected reflux. Frequency analysis showed that (34.7%- 86.7%) of symptoms occurred in the first minute after onset of the reflux. χ2 showed a significant association between SI with 1 minute and SAP for heartburn (P ≤ 0.0001) and regurgitation (P = 0.0003). There was also a significant association between cough with 2-minute window and SAP (P = 0.025). There was no significant association between TC at 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-minute time windows and SAP. There was no evidence of increased frequency of positive reflux to symptoms over time. There was also no significant difference in time window in relation to acid or nonacid reflux. It seems doubtful that a universal time window can be applied to all GERD symptoms to calculate symptom association.

Jackhammer esophagus: Observations on a European cohort

BACKGROUND

With the advent of high-resolution manometry (HRM), a new diagnosis, jackhammer esophagus, was introduced. Little is known about this rare condition, and the relationship between symptoms and hypercontractility is not always straightforward. The aim of our study was to describe a large cohort of patients with jackhammer esophagus and to investigate whether manometric findings are associated with the presence of symptoms.

METHODS

All patients from 06, 2014 until 12, 2015 seen at two tertiary centers with at least one hypercontractile swallow (distal contractile integral [DCI] >8000 mm Hg/s/cm) on HRM were analyzed. Patients with ≥20% premature swallows, or patients with another diagnosis explaining their symptoms were excluded.

KEY RESULTS

Of the 34 patients identified with jackhammer esophagus, most suffered from dysphagia (67.6%) and/or chest pain (47.1%). The symptom chest pain was not associated with any of the manometric findings, whereas dysphagia was associated with the DCI of the hypercontractile swallows and with intrabolus pressure. In addition, all patients who had an isolated DCI of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) zone >2000 mm Hg/s/cm had dysphagia. The differences in HRM and clinical characteristics between subgroups based on the contraction type (single- or multi-peaked) or based on meeting criteria of the Chicago Classification v3.0 and v2.0 were limited.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

The symptom dysphagia is accompanied with strong contractions of the LES, signs of a possible outflow obstruction, and a very high DCI. The presence of a multipeaked contraction seems to be of limited relevance, and caution is warranted in labeling patients with one hypercontractile swallow as normal.

Practice guidelines on the use of esophageal manometry - A GISMAD-SIGE-AIGO medical position statement

Patients with esophageal symptoms potentially associated to esophageal motor disorders such as dysphagia, chest pain, heartburn and regurgitation, represent one of the most frequent reasons for referral to gastroenterological evaluation. The utility of esophageal manometry in clinical practice is: (1) to accurately define esophageal motor function, (2) to identify abnormal motor function, and (3) to establish a treatment plan based on motor abnormalities. With this in mind, in the last decade, investigations and technical advances, with the introduction of high-resolution esophageal manometry, have enhanced our understanding and management of esophageal motility disorders. The following recommendations were developed to assist physicians in the appropriate use of esophageal manometry in modern patient care. They were discussed and approved after a comprehensive review of the medical literature pertaining to manometric techniques and their recent application. This position statement created under the auspices of the Gruppo Italiano di Studio per la Motilità dell'Apparato Digerente (GISMAD), Società Italiana di Gastroenterologia ed Endoscopia Digestiva (SIGE) and Associazione Italiana Gastroenterologi ed Endoscopisti Digestivi Ospedalieri (AIGO) is intended to help clinicians in applying manometric studies in the most fruitful manner within the context of their patients with esophageal symptoms.

Diagnostic yield of 24-hour esophageal manometry in non-cardiac chest pain

BACKGROUND

In the past, ambulatory 24-h manometry has been shown useful for the evaluation of patients with non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP). With the diagnostic improvements brought by pH-impedance monitoring and high-resolution manometry (HRM), the contribution of ambulatory 24-h manometry to the diagnosis of esophageal hypertensive disorders has become uncertain. Our aim was to assess the additional diagnostic yield of ambulatory manometry to HRM and ambulatory pH-impedance monitoring in this patient population.

METHODS

All patients underwent 24-h ambulatory pressure-pH-impedance monitoring and HRM. Patients had retrosternal pain as a predominant symptom and no explanation after cardiologic and digestive endoscopic evaluations. Diagnostic measurements were analyzed by two independent physicians.

KEY RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients met the inclusion criteria; 37.3% of the patients had their symptoms explained by abnormalities on pH-impedance monitoring and 6.8% by ambulatory manometry. Functional chest pain was diagnosed in 52.5% of the patients. High-resolution manometry, using the Chicago Classification v3.0 criteria alone, did not identify any of the four patients with esophageal spasm on ambulatory manometry. However, taking into account other abnormalities, such as simultaneous (rapid) or repetitive contractions, HRM had a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 98.2% for the diagnosis of esophageal spasm.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

In the work-up of NCCP, ambulatory 24-h manometry has a low additional diagnostic yield. However, it remains the best technique to identify esophageal spasm as the cause of symptoms. This is particularly useful when an unequivocal diagnosis is needed before treatment.

Relationship among symptoms, mucosal injury, and acid exposure in gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Symptoms, endoscopy, and pH monitoring form the basis of diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Their relationship was meaningful for primary care physicians, but still unclear. Our research aimed to compare questionnaire, endoscopy, and pH monitoring and to analyze their correlations.

METHODS

Three hundred patients who underwent the Reflux Disease Questionnaire (RDQ), endoscopy, and esophageal 24-hour pH monitoring from March 2007 to December 2010 in Peking University People's Hospital were enrolled. We analyzed the characteristics of different investigations and their relationships.

RESULTS

Male (OR for mild reflux esophagitis (RE) = 2.433, severe RE = 8.386), body mass index (BMI) (OR for mild RE = 1.222, severe RE = 1.297), and hernia (OR for mild RE = 6.059, severe RE = 17.547), were found to be the risk factors for RE; age (OR = 1.074) was correlated with severe RE. The consistency of questionnaire, endoscopy, and pH monitoring was poor: RDQ did not agree well with pH monitoring (κ = 0.061), nor with endoscopy (κ = 0.044); pH monitoring did not agree well with endoscopy (κ = 0.316). However, the severity of mucosa injury in RE was associated with pathological acid exposure (PAE): reflux episodes of >5 minutes (P = 0.035), the percentage time pH <4 (P = 0.017), and the DeMeester score (P = 0.016) increased significantly in patients with severe RE. Chest pain had poor relationship with RE or PAE.

CONCLUSIONS

Male, age, BMI, and hernia were probably risk factors for esophagitis. RDQ, endoscopy, and pH monitoring have their own focus and reinforce each other in diagnosis. Of the GERD symptoms, chest pain had negative correlation with RE or PAE.

Characteristics of esophageal proper muscle in patients with non-cardiac chest pain using high-frequency intraluminal ultrasound

BACKGROUND AND AIM

It is unclear which mechanisms play a predominant role in the pathogenesis of esophageal non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP). We aimed to examine the features of esophageal proper muscle and esophageal contractility using a high-frequency intraluminal ultrasound (HFIUS) in patients with NCCP.

METHODS

A total of 68 patients with NCCP were classified into two groups according to the results of typical reflux symptoms and/or esophagogastroduodenoscopy and/or 24-h esophageal pH monitoring: gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)-positive NCCP (n = 34) and GERD-negative NCCP groups (n = 34). Additionally 16 asymptomatic healthy subjects were included as controls. Using HFIUS, we analyzed the esophageal proper muscle thickness and cross-sectional area (CSA) at 3 cm above lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and 9 cm above LES during baseline rest and peak contraction periods among the control, GERD-positive NCCP and GERD-negative NCCP groups, and examined the completeness of three phases of esophageal action during five wet swallows in the three groups.

RESULTS

The muscle thickness and CSA tended to be larger in GERD-negative NCCP than in GERD-positive NCCP and in control groups at esophageal body during both periods. All of the controls and patients with GERD-positive NCCP presented the complete peristaltic type. Whereas, 11 of 34 patients with GERD-negative NCCP presented the incomplete peristaltic type.

CONCLUSIONS

Using HFIUS, patients with GERD-negative NCCP had increased muscle thickness and CSA. Some GERD-negative NCCP had the incomplete peristaltic type.

Anatomy and physiology of the esophageal body

The primary role of the esophagus is to propel swallowed food or fluid into the stomach and to prevent or clear gastroesophageal reflux. This function is achieved by an organized pattern that involves a sensory pathway, neural reflexes, and a motor response that includes esophageal tone, peristalsis, and shortening. The motor function of the esophagus is controlled by highly complex voluntary and involuntary mechanisms. There are three different functional areas in the esophagus: the upper esophageal sphincter, the esophageal body, and the LES. This article focused on anatomy and physiology of the esophageal body.

Cricopharyngeal Muscle Electromyography Findings in Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Objective

To analyze the grade of reflux and the behavior of the cricopharyngeal muscle (CPM) in patients with gastroesophageal reflux (GER) by means of electromyographic (EMG) analysis of CPM.

Study Design

Prospective clinical study.

Setting

Istanbul Training and Research Hospital.

Subject and Methods

Motor unit potential (MUP) recordings and kinesiological recordings of CPM were performed using a concentric needle electrode during dry material swallowing and 3-, 5-, and 10-mL water swallowing. Twenty-four patients with GER were compared with 21 healthy volunteers.

Results

GER was mild in 15 patients and moderate-to-severe in 9 patients. MUP recordings were normal in both groups during the preswallowing/postswallowing periods. Kinesiological investigations revealed that the number of patients who did not show a preswallow EMG burst had a positive correlation with the severity of reflux and the amount of liquid swallowed. Rebound bursts were observed in the patient and the control groups. Duration of preswallow and rebound bursts was similar in all groups. Duration of swallowing was shorter in mild GER patients compared with healthy volunteers and moderate-to-severe GER patients. Piecemeal deglutition during 10-mL liquid swallowing was higher in moderate-to-severe GER patients. We also found a positive correlation between the number of swallows and the severity of reflux.

Conclusion

Needle EMG of the upper esophageal sphincter was normal in GER patients. Kinesiological evaluations showed increased piecemeal deglutition and number of swallows that correlated positively with the severity of GER.

Extraesophageal gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms are not more frequently associated with proximal esophageal reflux than typical GERD symptoms

Extraesophageal (EE) symptoms such as cough and throat clearing are common in patients referred for reflux testing, but are less commonly associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Patients with reflux associated EE symptoms often lack typical GERD symptoms of heartburn and regurgitation. Our aim was to compare the frequency of proximal esophageal reflux between esophageal (typical) symptoms and EE (atypical) symptoms. Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (MII-pH) tracings were blinded by an investigator so that symptom markers were relabeled with a number without disclosure of symptom type. We selected 40 patients with at least five reflux-related symptom events for one of four symptoms (heartburn, regurgitation, cough, or throat clearing). A blinded investigator analyzed all 200 reflux episodes, reporting the proximal esophageal extent of the reflux for all symptoms. The percentage of symptom-related reflux extending proximally to 17 cm above the LES was similar among all four symptom types. At least 50% of all symptoms were associated with proximal esophageal reflux to 17 cm, with regurgitation having the highest frequency at 60%. Our data indicate that EE symptoms are not more frequently associated with proximal esophageal reflux than typical esophageal symptoms.

Noncardiac chest pain: epidemiology, natural course and pathogenesis

Noncardiac chest pain is defined as recurrent chest pain that is indistinguishable from ischemic heart pain after a reasonable workup has excluded a cardiac cause. Noncardiac chest pain is a prevalent disorder resulting in high healthcare utilization and significant work absenteeism. However, despite its chronic nature, noncardiac chest pain has no impact on patients' mortality. The main underlying mechanisms include gastroesophageal reflux, esophageal dysmotility and esophageal hypersensitivity. Gastroesophageal reflux disease is likely the most common cause of noncardiac chest pain. Esophageal dysmotility affects only the minority of noncardiac chest pain patients. Esophageal hypersensitivity may be present in non-GERD-related noncardiac chest pain patients regardless if esophageal dysmotility is present or absent. Psychological co-morbidities such as panic disorder, anxiety, and depression are also common in noncardiac chest pain patients and often modulate patients' perception of disease severity.

Exertional esophageal pH-metry and manometry in recurrent chest pain

AIM: To investigate the diagnostic efficacy of 24-h and exertional esophageal pH-metry and manometry in patients with recurrent chest pain.

METHODS: The study included 111 patients (54% male) with recurrent angina-like chest pain, non-responsive to therapy with proton pump inhibitors. Sixty-five (59%) had non-obstructive lesions in coronary artery angiography, and in 46 (41%) significant coronary artery narrowing was found. In all patients, 24-h esophageal pH-metry and manometry, and treadmill stress tests with simultaneous esophageal pH-metry and manometry monitoring were performed. During a 24-h examination the percentage of spontaneous chest pain (sCP) episodes associated with acid reflux or dysmotility (symptom index, SI) was calculated. Patients with SI > 50% for acid gastroesophageal reflux (GER) were classified as having GER-related sCP. The remaining symptomatic individuals were determined as having non-GER-related sCP. During the stress test, the occurrence of chest pain, episodes of esophageal acidification (pH < 4 for 10 s) and esophageal spasm with more than 55% of simultaneous contractions (exercise-provoked esophageal spasm or EPES) were noted.

RESULTS: Sixty-eight (61%) individuals reported sCP during 24-h esophageal function monitoring. Eleven of these (16%) were classified as having GER-related sCP and 53/68 (84%) as having non-GER-related sCP. The exercise-provoked chest pain during a stress test occurred in 13/111 (12%) subjects. In order to compare the clinical usefulness of 24-h esophageal function monitoring and its examination limited only to the treadmill stress test, the standard parameters of diagnostic test evaluation were determined. The occurrence of GER-related or non-GER-related sCP was assumed as a “gold standard”. Afterwards, accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were calculated. These parameters expressed a prediction of GER-related or non-GER-related sCP occurrence by the presence of chest pain, esophageal acidification and EPES. Accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of chest pain during the stress test predicting any sCP occurrence were 28%, 35% and 80%, respectively, predicting GER-related sCP were 42%, 0% and 83%, respectively, and predicting non-GER-related sCP were 57%, 36% and 83%, respectively. Similar values were obtained for exercise-related acidification with pH < 4 longer than 10 s in the prediction of GER-related sCP (44%, 36% and 92%, respectively) and EPES in relation to non-GER-related sCP (48%, 23% and 84%, respectively).

CONCLUSION: The presence of chest pain, esophageal acidification and EPES had greater than 80% specificity to exclude the GER-related and non-GER-related causes of recurrent chest pain.

Functional dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome in patients with achalasia and its association with non-cardiac chest pain and a decreased health-related quality of life

OBJECTIVE

In patients with achalasia, little is known about symptoms of the gastrointestinal tract other than the esophagus. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of two functional disorders, functional dyspepsia (FD) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), in a group of treated achalasia patients and to assess the additional impact of these disorders on health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Questionnaires assessing the Rome II criteria for FD and IBS together with the Eckardt clinical symptom score and RAND-36 were sent to 171 treated achalasia patients.

RESULTS

Of these patients, 76.6% returned their questionnaires. In the group of achalasia patients, 23% fulfilled the criteria for FD (Dutch general population 13-14%), and 21% fulfilled the criteria for IBS (Dutch general population 1-6%). The prevalence of frequent chest pain (at least weekly) was higher in patients with FD and/or IBS than in those without these symptoms (54.2% versus 28.2%; p=0.004). Female patients with achalasia and with frequent chest pain showed a higher probability of fulfilling the FD and/or IBS criteria (adjusted OR 2.90 (1.18-7.14) and 3.35 (1.4-8.1), respectively; both with p <0.05). Patients fulfilling the FD and/or IBS criteria scored a lower HRQoL on the RAND-36 subscales--pain, social functioning, and vitality--as compared with patients not fulfilling these criteria (p <0.006). CONCLUSIONS; Symptoms of FD and IBS in patients with treated achalasia are common and have a negative impact on HRQoL. Therefore, this has to be included in the standard evaluation of achalasia patients. The association with chest pain suggests a mutual underlying mechanism.

Extraesophageal GERD

The manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) have been classified into either esophageal or extraesophageal syndromes. Cough, reflux laryngitis, and asthma have been classified as extraesophageal syndromes, whereas reflux chest pain has been classified as a symptomatic syndrome of GERD. In extraesophageal syndromes, patients usually do not display the classic symptoms of reflux, such as heartburn and regurgitation. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and pH monitoring, when used to diagnose reflux in patients with symptoms not classic for GERD, have proved to have poor sensitivity and are often not diagnostically helpful. In contrast, an empiric trial of proton pump inhibitors is a well-established, cost-effective tool.

Improved diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux in patients with unexplained chronic cough

BACKGROUND

Symptoms, oesophageal pHmetry and proton pump inhibitor treatment are used for diagnosing gastro-oesophageal reflux-related cough. Weakly acidic reflux is now increasingly associated with reflux symptoms such as regurgitation or chest pain.

AIM

To study the association between weakly acidic reflux and cough in a selected, large group of patients with unexplained chronic cough.

METHODS

A total of 100 patients with chronic cough (77 'off' and 23 'on' a proton pump inhibitor) were studied using impedance-pHmetry for reflux detection and manometry for objective cough monitoring. Symptom Association Probability (SAP) Analysis characterized the reflux-cough association.

RESULTS

Acid reflux could be a potential mechanism for cough in 45 patients (with either heartburn, high acid exposure or +SAP for acid reflux). Weakly acidic reflux could be a potential mechanism for cough in 24 patients (with either increased oesophageal volume exposure, increased number of weakly acidic reflux or +SAP for weakly acidic reflux). Reflux could not be identified as a potential mechanism for cough in 31 patients.

CONCLUSION

A positive association between cough and weakly acidic reflux was found in a significant subgroup of patients with unexplained chronic cough. Impedance-pH-manometry identified patients in whom cough can be related to reflux that would have been disregarded using the standard diagnostic criteria for acid reflux.

Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH esophageal testing compared to pH alone for diagnosing both acid and weakly acidic gastroesophageal reflux

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Twenty-four-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH (MII-pH) esophageal monitoring detects reflux episodes at all pH levels, including acid reflux and weakly acidic reflux (WAR). The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of pH monitoring alone in detecting acid reflux and WAR compared with MII-pH.

METHODS

For the detection of acid reflux: 60 consecutive MII-pH studies of patients off acid suppression were included. All studies initially were read by exclusively analyzing pH tracing for acid reflux episodes. Subsequently, all studies were blindly read again analyzing MII-pH-detected acid reflux episodes (pH decrease of <4 and MII-detected reflux). For the detection of weakly acidic reflux 40 MII-pH studies were included. Each study initially was read by identifying WAR on the pH tracing. Subsequently, studies were re-analyzed using MII tracings, classifying MII-detected reflux episodes into acid, WAR, or nonacid reflux.

RESULTS

For the detection of acid reflux the pH alone compared with MII-pH yielded a specificity of 68%, 67%, and 58%, respectively, for either abnormal percentage time of pH less than 4, positive symptom index, or both. The percentage time that the pH was less than 4 was significantly higher using pH alone compared with MII-pH. Eighty-one percent of acid gastroesophageal reflux episodes exclusively detected by pH were associated with MII-detected swallow. For the detection of WAR compared with MII, pH alone had a sensitivity of only 28%. Eighty-three percent of WAR episodes detected by pH were not associated with MII-detected reflux.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of pH alone for the detection of acid reflux is very sensitive but lacks specificity compared with MII-pH. pH alone may overdiagnose abnormal acid reflux in up to 22% of tested patients. Also, the use of pH for the detection of WAR has poor sensitivity.

Gastroesophageal reflux and gastric emptying, revisited

Total gastric emptying is delayed in 10% to 33% of adult patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), but a strong correlation between duration of gastric emptying and severity of acid reflux or esophagitis has never been proved. Previous studies reported that patients with GERD might have exaggerated postprandial fundus relaxation with retention of food and triggering of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs). There is a positive correlation between postprandial fundus relaxation and number of TLESRs and also between proximal gastric emptying and esophageal acid exposure. However, new studies suggest that a high number of TLESRs and reflux events may occur even with accelerated gastric emptying, and prolonged gastric retention might be associated with less rather than more esophageal acid exposure. Using simultaneous gastric emptying and esophageal pH impedance we found that the rate of gastric emptying might determine the acidity and proximal extent of reflux: The slower the emptying, the higher the pH and proximal extent of the refluxate.

Does this patient have oesophageal motility abnormality or pathological acid reflux?

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The diagnostic values of particular symptoms centred on oesophagus, among patients with suspected oesophageal motility abnormality or pathological acid exposure, are not yet fully understood. The aim of this study was to determine the predictive accuracy of these symptoms in diagnosis of oesophageal motility disorder or pathological acid exposure. PATIENTS AND METHODS.: A total of 462 patients who had undergone conventional oesophageal manometry and ambulatory 24-h pH monitoring to investigate a clinical suspicion of oesophageal motility disorder and pathological acid exposure were enrolled in this study. According to their principal complaints, the patients were divided into the dysphagia category, the non-cardiac chest pain category, the gastrooesophageal reflux disease-related symptom category and the extraoesophageal symptom category.

RESULTS

Two hundred and two (44%) out of 462 patients yielded abnormal findings on manometry and/or pH monitoring. Dysphagia was associated with a likelihood ratio (LR) of 2.11 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.02-4.00)] in patients exhibiting a combination of oesophageal motility abnormality and pathological acid exposure. During oesophageal manometry, the dysphagia substantially increased the likelihood of classic achalasia (LR, 6.24; 95% CI, 3.32-8.78) and diffuse oesophageal spasm (LR, 3.58; 95% CI, 1.03-7.12). When the patients with dysphagia were divided into two groups according to the severity of their symptoms, classic achalasia was significantly frequent in patients with severe dysphagia (P = 0.016). On the other hand, non-cardiac chest pain was the clinical factor that reduced the likelihood of classic achalasia (LR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.04-0.93). The distribution of pathological acid exposure was significantly frequent between the groups of patients with and without gastrooesophageal reflux disease-related symptom (P = 0.011).

CONCLUSION

A small number of oesophageal symptoms are helpful in predicting the likelihood of abnormal findings on oesophageal tests among patients with a clinical suspicion of oesophageal motility disorder and pathological acid exposure. The most useful finding is a severe dysphagia, which is likely to have classic achalasia.

Functional chest pain: nociception and visceral hyperalgesia

Functional chest pain is a common, yet poorly understood entity. The focus of this review is to explore the evolving research and clinical approaches with a particular emphasis on the sensory or afferent neuronal dysfunction of the esophagus as a key player in the manifestation of this pain syndrome. Although once regarded as a psychologic or esophageal motility disorder, recent advances have shown that many of these patients have visceral hyperalgesia. Whether visceral hypersensitivity is a central or peripheral perturbation of the gut-brain axis remains debatable. Response to empirical therapy with high-dose proton pump inhibitors, upper endoscopy, or prolonged recording of esophageal pH may identify gastroesophageal reflux disease as a source of chest pain. Esophageal balloon distension study can serve as a useful test for identifying hypersensitivity. Newer techniques, including functional magnetic resonance imaging, magnetoencephalogram, and cortical evoked potentials, are being investigated. High doses of proton pump inhibitors and low doses of tricyclic antidepressants or trazadone remain the mainstay of therapy, although several new approaches including theophylline have been shown to be beneficial.

The role of pH monitoring in extraesophageal gastroesophageal reflux disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is linked to several extraesophageal disease states including laryngitis, asthma, chronic cough, and noncardiac chest pain (NCCP). Although 24-hour pH monitoring is considered the "gold standard" in the diagnosis of typical GERD, it is also increasingly used in establishing the diagnosis of GERD in patients with extraesophageal symptoms. The clinical utility of pH monitoring in this patient population, however, remains controversial. In this article, the authors examine the role of pH monitoring in laryngitis, asthma, chronic cough, and NCCP.

Motor and sensory function of the esophagus: revelations through ultrasound imaging

Catheter based high frequency intraluminal ultrasound (HFIUS) imaging is a powerful tool to study esophageal sensory and motor function and dysfunction in vivo in humans. It has provided a number of important insights into the longitudinal muscle function of the esophagus. Based on the ultrasound images and intraluminal pressure recordings, it is clear that there is synchrony in the timing as well as the amplitude of contraction between the circular and the longitudinal muscle layers of the esophagus in normal subjects. On the other hand, in patients with spastic disorders of the esophagus, there is an asynchrony of contraction related to the timing and amplitude of contraction of the two muscle layers during peristalsis. Achalasia, diffuse esophageal spasm, and nutcracker esophagus (spastic motor disorders of the esophagus) are associated with hypertrophy of the circular as well as longitudinal muscle layers. A sustained contraction of the longitudinal muscle of the esophagus is temporally related to chest pain and heartburn and may very well be the cause of symptoms. Longitudinal muscle function of the esophagus can be studied in vivo in humans using dynamic ultrasound imaging. Longitudinal muscle dysfunction appears to be important in the motor and sensory disorders of the esophagus.

Sensory and motor function of the esophagus: lessons from ultrasound imaging

Catheter-based high-frequency intraluminal ultrasound imaging is a powerful tool to study esophageal sensory and motor function and dysfunction in vivo in humans. It can be combined with manometry, pH, and impedance measurement techniques to determine the relationships between different physiologic parameters. High-frequency intraluminal ultrasound imaging has provided a number of important insights regarding the longitudinal muscle function of the esophagus. On the basis of the ultrasound images and intraluminal pressure recordings, it seems that there is synchrony in the timing and the amplitude of contraction between the circular and longitudinal muscle layers. A sustained contraction of the longitudinal muscle layer is temporally related to esophageal chest pain and heartburn. The biomechanics of the esophageal wall and its relationship to sensory and motor function can be studied in humans in vivo by using high-frequency intraluminal ultrasound much more precisely than has previously been possible. Achalasia, diffuse esophageal spasm, and nutcracker esophagus are associated with hypertrophy of circular and longitudinal muscle layers. Finally, high-frequency intraluminal ultrasound imaging is the only technique that can detect reflux-related distention of the esophagus and its role in esophageal symptoms. Future approaches to display and quantify ultrasound image data are discussed. The principles of high-frequency intraluminal ultrasound described here are also applicable to study of the motor and sensory function of the other regions of the gastrointestinal tract.

Acid, weakly acidic and non-acid gastro-oesophageal reflux: differences, prevalence and clinical relevance

In patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD), oesophageal symptoms and mucosal damage traditionally are related to acid-reflux episodes with pH lower than 4. Oesophageal or extra-oesophageal symptoms of GORD may also be associated with less acidic reflux (pH 4-7). New methodologies have evolved to complement pH monitoring for characterisation of less acidic gastro-oesophageal reflux. This review will focus on definition, detection, pathophysiology and symptom association of weakly acidic and non-acid reflux, in both adult and paediatric populations.

Extraesophageal and atypical manifestations of GERD

Extraesophageal manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are essentially complications of GERD that primarily involve organs that are in proximity to the esophagus. Non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP) is an atypical manifestation of GERD, because symptoms originate in essence from the esophagus. In both atypical and extraesophageal manifestation of GERD frequent heartburn is uncommon and lack of GERD symptoms is not unusual. Esophageal mucosal injury is rarely present making upper endoscopy a low-yield procedure in both conditions. While association with GERD has been commonly reported, the extent of causality remains unknown. In NCCP, the usefulness of the proton pump inhibitor (PPI) test in diagnosing GERD-related NCCP has been established. Similar value in extraesophageal manifestations of GERD has been proposed, but rarely studied. While treatment of extraesophageal manifestations of GERD remains a challenge, PPIs in at least double the standard dose, should be considered for the initial therapy. Properly designed therapeutic studies are still lacking as well as the exact role of antireflux surgery in this patient population.

A review of the atypical manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease

Manifestations of atypical gastroesophageal reflux disease (GORD) are varied, and the presentation of atypical symptoms may occur in the absence of typical symptoms. The most sensitive and specific investigation for GORD is pH monitoring, and its application in atypical disease is utilized throughout this paper as a basis for correlating disease and pathogenesis. The less well-known areas of laryngeal manifestations, particularly chronic hoarseness and globus, are discussed in addition to recent work on orodental manifestations. Well-known areas of cardiac and respiratory manifestations, which include chronic cough and asthma, are also reviewed. Evidence from clinical trials indicates that aggressive anti-reflux therapy in patients with atypical symptoms can be effective. Where appropriate, medical therapy may involve long-term proton pump inhibitor, although further research outlining the roles of other therapies such as surgery is awaited.

Evaluation of symptom index in identifying gastroesophageal reflux disease-related noncardiac chest pain

BACKGROUND

Symptom index (SI), which represents the percentage of perceived gastroesophageal reflux-related symptoms that correlate with esophageal acid reflux events (pH <4), has been suggested as a measure to improve diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux (GER)-related noncardiac chest pain (NCCP). Because no study has evaluated the value of the symptom index in NCCP patients, data to support this claim have yet to be elucidated.

AIM

To evaluate the value of SI in identifying gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)-related NCCP patients.

METHODS

Patients enrolled in this study were referred by a cardiologist after a comprehensive work-up excluded a cardiac cause for their chest pain. All patients underwent upper endoscopy to determine esophageal inflammation and 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring to assess esophageal acid exposure. Patients were instructed to record all chest pain episodes during the pH test. Patients with a positive SI (> or =50%) underwent the proton pump inhibitors (PPI) test, which is a therapeutic trial using a short course of high dose PPI.

RESULTS

A total of 94 patients with NCCP were included in this study. Forty-seven (50%) had either a positive upper endoscopy or an abnormal pH test and were considered GERD-Positive. Forty-seven patients (50%) had both tests negative and were considered GERD-Negative. Total number of reflux episodes and percent total, supine and upright time pH less than 4, were significantly higher in the GERD-Positive group as compared with the GERD-Negative group (P < 0.0001, P < 0.0001, P = 0.0045, and P < 0.0001 respectively). Only 9 (19.1%) patients in the GERD-Positive group and 5 (10.6%) patients in the GERD-Negative group had a positive SI (p = ns). Eight (89%) out of the 9 patients who had a positive SI in the GERD-Positive group and 2 (40%) out of 5 patients in the GERD-Negative group responded to the PPI test.

CONCLUSION

Positive SI is relatively uncommon in NCCP patients, regardless if GERD is present or absent. Hence, symptom index provides very little improvement in diagnosing GERD-related NCCP.

Esophageal dysmotility and acid sensitivity in patients with mitral valve prolapse and chest pain

Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) patients often experience non-cardiac chest pain. The aims of this study were to determine, in patients with non-cardiac chest pain: (i) whether esophageal dysmotility is more common in patients with MVP than in patients without MVP; and (ii) if acid sensitivity is an important cause of the chest pain in MVP patients. Esophageal manometry and acid perfusion testing were performed in 277 consecutive patients with non-cardiac chest pain. Patients with MVP (13 female, one male; mean age 49 years) were more likely (P = 0.01) to have esophageal dysmotility, while acid perfusion was less likely (P < 0.05) to provoke their chest pain, than in patients without MVP. The most common esophageal motor abnormalities detected in patients with and without MVP were diffuse esophageal spasm (prevalence, 57%) and non-specific motor disorder (prevalence, 9%), respectively. This study, the first large prospective series examining possible esophageal sensorimotor correlates of chest pain in MVP patients, demonstrates that in the absence of a cardiac cause for chest pain, a specific esophageal motility disorder should be excluded, rather than assuming the chest pain is likely to be due to acid sensitivity.

Noncardiac chest pain: evaluation and treatment

Noncardiac chest pain is a heterogeneous condition for which diagnosis and treatment are challenging. Research is needed to streamline evaluation to minimize unnecessary invasive testing and costs. Chest pain clinics to assess chest pain patients are popular in the United States and may be of value in reassuring patients and reducing presentation to hospital; however, recently this has been contended [111]. Options for the effective treatment of NCCP are dependent on the risk of an adverse outcome and the cost-effectiveness of the management algorithm that is followed. Most (64%) of those presenting to the emergency department with chest pain are classified as having NCCP [112,113]. GERD is probably the most important cause and application of a test of acid suppression with a high-dose PPI for 1 to 2 weeks seems to be a useful diagnostic tool. In those patients with GERD-related NCCP, short-term and potentially long-term therapy with a PPI (commonly higher than standard dose) is required to alleviate symptoms. Esophageal dysmotility is relatively uncommon in patients with NCCP and evaluation by esophageal manometry might be limited to rule out achalasia. Chest wall syndromes are common but probably often missed. Many patients with NCCP have psychologic or psychiatric abnormalities, as either the cause or an effect of the chest pain, but diagnosis here depends on techniques not applied easily in the acute situation. Pain modulators seem to offer significant improvement in chest pain symptoms for non-GERD-related NCCP. Finally, trials of management strategies to deal with this problem are required urgently, because the earlier discharge of patients with NCCP may exacerbate the problem. Fig. 2 provides a flow chart for diagnosis and treatment of NCCP.

Functional Heartburn

Functional heartburn is defined as the presence of a retrosternal burning sensation in the absence of pathologic gastroesophageal reflux. The underlying pathophysiology seems to be heterogeneous. In a subset of patients, esophageal hypersensitivity to physiologic esophageal acid exposure is involved, and this is likely to respond to intensive antireflux treatment. Antireflux surgery was not studied systematically in these patients and should be considered only in exceptional cases. In the remaining patients, non-acid reflux, esophageal mechanosensitivity, and psychological factors may be involved. Treatment options in these patients are limited owing to a lack of studies. Emerging therapies include selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and relaxation therapy.

Upper gastrointestinal evaluation of Chinese patients with non-cardiac chest pain

AIMS

To test the usefulness of upper gastrointestinal investigations and quality of life assessment in Chinese patients with non-cardiac chest pain.

METHODS

Seventy-eight consecutive patients with non-cardiac chest pain underwent upper endoscopy. Eight patients had upper gastrointestinal pathology (10%). The remaining 70 patients received acid perfusion test, oesophageal manometry and 24-h ambulatory oesophageal pH (n=65)/manometry (n=61), and the results were compared with those of healthy controls (n=20). Symptoms and quality of life (SF-36) were assessed by standard validated questionnaire.

RESULTS

Significant acid reflux symptoms were present in five (5/70, 7%) patients. Abnormal 24-h oesophageal pH, indicating gastro-oesophageal reflux, was found in 19 (19/65, 29%) patients. The percentage of simultaneous contractions was higher and the percentage peristalsis was lower in patients with non-cardiac chest pain when compared with normal subjects by 24-h ambulatory manometry. Patients with non-cardiac chest pain had a lower SF-36 score when compared to controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Typical acid reflux symptoms are uncommon in Chinese patients with non-cardiac chest pain, but abnormal 24-h pH results, indicating gastro-oesophageal reflux, were found in 29% of patients. Ineffective contractions were more frequently found in patients with non-cardiac chest pain by 24-h ambulatory manometry, which may have a bearing on the impaired quality of life in such patients. Upper gastrointestinal investigations are useful for the evaluation of Chinese patients with non-cardiac chest pain.

Manometry of the gastrointestinal tract: toy or tool?

In the eyes of scientific researchers, there are various manometric techniques that are useful tools for studying the motility of the gastrointestinal tract. Clinicians, however, regard most of these techniques as toys, either because they do not lead to clinically relevant results, or because they are too cumbersome in clinical practice. Nevertheless, a number of manometric techniques have reached the status of clinically relevant diagnostic procedure in gastroenterology. Among these, oesophageal manometry is the most important. Not only has conventional oesophageal manometry been added to the diagnostic armamentarium of many hospitals, but also prolonged ambulatory recording of oesophageal pressures (usually combined with pH monitoring). Small intestinal manometry has also gained the status of a diagnostic tool, in particular in patients in whom the existence of pseudo-obstruction syndrome is suspected and in patients in whom total colectomy is considered because of intractable constipation. Sphincter of Oddi manometry is another example of a clinically relevant manometric technique to be used in particular in patients with suspected dyskinesia of the sphincter of Oddi. The value of anorectal manometry may have been overestimated in the past. The most important indication is the exclusion of Hirschsprung disease. The contribution of anorectal manometry to the diagnosis of anismus and to the work-up of patients with faecal incontinence is limited.

Acid, nonacid, and gas reflux in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease during ambulatory 24-hour pH-impedance recordings

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Gastroesophageal reflux can be acid, nonacid, pure liquid, or a mixture of gas and liquid. We investigated the prevalence of acid and nonacid reflux and the air-liquid composition of the refluxate in ambulant healthy subjects and patients with reflux disease (GERD).

METHODS

Twenty-four-hour ambulatory recordings were performed in 30 patients with symptomatic GERD and erosive esophagitis and in 28 controls. Esophageal pH and impedance were used to identify acid reflux (pH drop below 4.0), minor acid reflux (pH drop above 4.0), nonacid reflux (pH drop less than 1 unit + liquid reflux in impedance), and gas reflux.

RESULTS

The total rate of gastroesophageal reflux episodes was similar in patients and controls. Patients with GERD had a higher proportion (45% vs. 33%) and rate of acid reflux than controls (21.5 [9-35]/24 h vs. 13 [6.5-21]/24 h; P < 0.05). One third of reflux events was nonacid in both groups. Mixed reflux of gas and liquid was the most frequent pattern with gas preceding liquid in 50%-80% of cases. Pure liquid reflux was more often acid in patients with GERD than controls (45% vs. 32%; P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Reflux of gastric contents was similarly frequent in patients with GERD and controls. Although there was no difference in the overall number of reflux episodes, more acidic reflux occurred in symptomatic patients with GERD, suggesting differences in gastric acid secretion or distribution.

A critical approach to noncardiac chest pain: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment

Approximately 30% of coronary angiograms performed in this country are negative for significant coronary artery disease. These patients are classified as having noncardiac or unexplained chest pain (UCP). Despite the good overall prognosis, this condition has significant morbidity and costs. The pathophysiology of this condition is likely caused by overlapping cardiac, esophageal, and psychiatric abnormalities with visceral hyperalgesia playing a central role. Gastroenterologists are often consulted in the evaluation of these patients because esophageal disorders are among the most common conditions associated with UCP. However, clinical symptoms are unreliable in differentiating between esophageal and cardiac causes of UCP. Gastroesophageal reflux disease, not esophageal motility disorders, is the most common esophageal disorder present in patients with UCP. The most useful diagnostic test in the evaluation of UCP is 24-h pH monitoring. An initial empiric trial of high-dose acid suppression is the most cost-effective intervention in the management of these patients. A clinical algorithm is suggested for the evaluation and treatment of UCP.

Diagnosis of reflux disease

There are numerous tests for which a diagnostic value in the context of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease has been claimed. Some of these tests (e.g. the acid perfusion test) have become obsolete after the advent of 24-hour oesophageal pH monitoring. With the latter test not only can excessive reflux be identified, but also, and more importantly, a temporal relationship can be demonstrated between a patient's symptoms and reflux episodes. Radiographical examination of the oesophagus has largely been replaced by endoscopy, although the use of the former test is still indicated in certain circumstances (e.g. in the differentiation of sliding from para-oesophageal hiatus hernia). In clinical practice, the so-called proton pump inhibitor test has gained considerable popularity. Despite several studies on the specificity and sensitivity of this test, its value has not yet been established with sufficient accuracy. Conventional manometric evaluation of lower oesophageal sphincter pressure has been over-emphasized as a diagnostic test in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Standards for oesophageal manometry. A position statement from the Gruppo Italiano di Studio Motilità Apparato Digerente (GISMAD)

Manometry is an important tool in the diagnosis of oesophageal motility, disorders, but proper instruments and methods are needed to obtain useful clinical information. The authors reviewed the minimal technical requirements, operative aspects, which information the final report should contain as well as indications and contraindications of the text itself. Technical requirements: At least a three-channel, multiple-lumen catheter perfused with a pneumo-hydraulic capillary infusion system which ensures deltaP/deltaT>150-200 mmHg/sec.; data should be recorded at a sampling rate of > or =8 Hz to study the oesophageal body and lower oesophageal sphincter; lower oesophageal sphincter tonic (pressure) and phasic activity (relaxations) and oesophageal body amplitude and peristaltic activity should be recorded. The final report must contain the patient's details, the indication for the test and a manometric diagnosis. Indications for manometry: Dysphagia (after ruling out any organic pathology); non- cardiac chest pain (after ruling out any cardiopulmonary involvement); systemic collagenosis (to investigate oesophageal involvement); gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (if surgery is planned). Contraindications are limited to: pharyngeal or upper oesophageal obstructions, oesophageal bullous disorder, cardiac conditions in which vagal stimulation may not be tolerated, severe coagulopathy and patient non-compliance.

Five-year audit of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH-manometry in clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Esophageal function testing was developed to aid diagnosis in patients with negative endoscopy. Although combined 24-h esophageal pH-manometry is now commercially available, its routine clinical effectiveness has not yet been studied.

METHODS

From 1992 to 1996 we evaluated 303 consecutive patients who were first-time referrals to our unit for 24-h esophageal pH-manometry. The referral indications were gastroesophageal reflux disease, 47.2%; dysphagia, 18.5%; non-cardiac chest pain, 14.9%; connective tissue disease, 13.2%; and symptomatic patients after antireflux surgery, 6.3%.

RESULTS

Overall, esophageal function testing altered the diagnosis of 44% of the patients, confirmed it in 38%, and specifically changed the management of 66%. The final clinical 'diagnosis' was reflux disease, 54% (32% with non-specific esophageal motility disorder); connective tissue disease, 9.9%; achalasia, 9.6%; other specific esophageal motility disorders, 3.3%; non-specific esophageal motility disorders, 6.9%; and normal, 16.2%. The cost per testing was estimated to be US$305 and per change in management US$465.

CONCLUSION

Combined 24-h pH-manometry has been shown to be a useful and cost-effective test for the management of selected patients in whom the primary investigation was insufficient.

Sustained esophageal contraction: a marker of esophageal chest pain identified by intraluminal ultrasonography

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Intraluminal pressure recording systems have not demonstrated predictable esophageal motor correlates of unexplained chest pain. This study used continuous high-frequency intraluminal ultrasonography to characterize esophageal contraction at the time of spontaneous and provoked chest pain.

METHODS

Intraluminal pressure, pH, and ultrasound images of the esophagus were recorded for a maximum of 24 hours in 10 subjects with unexplained chest pain. Changes in esophageal muscle thickness were measured as a marker of muscle contraction. Ten additional subjects with suspected esophageal chest pain were studied after edrophonium chloride injection to provoke symptoms. Ten healthy subjects were studied as controls.

RESULTS

Eighteen of 24 spontaneous chest pain episodes were preceded by a sustained esophageal contraction (SEC) detected on ultrasonography (mean duration, 68.0 seconds). This motor pattern was not accompanied by changes in intraluminal pressure. Four of 24 asymptomatic control periods were accompanied by SEC, although these contractions were of shorter mean duration (29.0 seconds; P < 0.001). SEC was observed in 5 subjects with a positive chest pain response to edrophonium and in none of the 5 subjects with a negative response. SEC was not detected in normal subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a strong temporal correlation between a previously unrecognized esophageal motor event, SEC, and both spontaneous and provoked esophageal chest pain.

The changing use of esophageal manometry in clinical practice

OBJECTIVE

Clinical practice guidelines now advise against the use of esophageal manometry in the early evaluation of unexplained chest pain. We examined data from patients referred for manometric evaluation over a 10-yr period (1987-1996) to see if clinicians were changing practice patterns and whether manometric diagnoses were affected by the changes.

METHODS

Principal indications for the procedure and manometric findings were extracted from a review of 1162 subjects referred to a single clinical laboratory. The tracings were analyzed using a standardized classification method and categorized according to a pathophysiology-based scheme. Referral indications and manometric diagnoses were compared for the first and second 5-yr periods of study.

RESULTS

Chest pain as a referral indication declined from the first to the second half of the study period (odds ratio, 0.44; p < 0.0001), whereas dysphagia and preoperative evaluations became more common (odds ratio, 1.3; p < 0.05; odds ratio, 13.7; p < 0.0001, respectively). Similarly, hypermotility disorders decreased in frequency (odds ratio, 0.63; p = 0.0001), whereas hypomotility disorders increased (odds ratio, 1.6; p < 0.01). The decrease in hypermotility disorders was solely related to a decrease in nonspecific spastic disorders, including nutcracker esophagus (odds ratio, 0.58; p < 0.0001); the proportion of diagnoses of achalasia and diffuse esophageal spasm remained stable.

CONCLUSIONS

These data show that practice patterns are already following current guidelines. They also reflect the disillusionment of clinicians with the poor specificity of manometry in chest pain management, the increasing popularity of antireflux surgery, yet the ongoing observation that nonspecific spastic disorders are closely associated with unexplained chest pain and may have a still-undefined pathogenetic role.

The diagnostic value of oesophageal radionuclide transit in patients admitted for but without acute myocardial infarction

The use of radionuclide transit (RT) as a screening test for chest pain of oesophageal origin has been debated. The aim of this study was to determine the value of RT as a screening test for oesophageal disorders in comparison with oesophageal manometry in patients admitted with acute chest pain but without acute myocardial infarction (non-AMI patients), and to assess the frequency of oesophageal disease present in these patients. A total of 222 non-AMI patients entered the study. An extensive examination programme comprised noninvasive cardiac studies, pulmonary studies, a careful physical examination of the musculoskeletal system, and oesophago-gastric examinations including endoscopy, pH monitoring of the oesophagus and a Bernstein test. In 91% of the patients one or more diagnoses were obtained. Based on clinical and laboratory data a 'consensus' diagnosis was made. With manometry as the reference RT had a poor sensitivity (35%) but an acceptable specificity (82%). With the consensus diagnosis as the gold standard the sensitivities of both manometry and RT were poor (29%), whereas the specificity of RT, but not of manometry, was very high (97%). Gastrointestinal diagnoses were found in 57% of the patients. In conclusion, none of the applied oesophageal examinations are valuable as single screening tests. Both RT and manometry have low sensitivities. RT may be used as a cheap, noninvasive and rapid supplementary examination. When positive, it strongly supports further invasive studies of the oesophagus in non-AMI patients with unexplained chest pain.

Medical therapy of gastroesophageal reflux and management of esophageal strictures

The goals of modern medical therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease are threefold: first, eliminate symptoms; second, heal injured esophageal mucosa; third, manage and/or prevent complications. Selection of a particular medical regimen depends on the severity of the disease, effectiveness of the therapy, cost, and convenience of the medical regimen. An accurate diagnosis needs to be made in patients suspected with esophageal strictures. If there is a treatable underlying disease, specific therapy is essential. The goal of dilation therapy should be established and set about to accomplish in a timely, but unhurried fashion. Fluoroscopy and wire-guided dilators should be used liberally, especially for difficult strictures.

Management of gastrointestinal motility disorders. A practical guide to drug selection and appropriate ancillary measures

The focus of management of gastrointestinal motility disorders should be to improve survival and quality of life. Some motor disorders are annoying, but are compatible with virtually normal activity and carry no significant life risk. Conversely, other motor disorders are highly incapacitating and may shorten life expectancy because of complications and nutritional impairment. Management is based first on establishing the correct diagnosis and prognosis; secondly, on adjusting therapy to the severity of illness; and thirdly, on preventing significant complications. Simple recommendations on appropriate changes in lifestyle and reassurance may suffice in mild cases. Pharmacological therapy and, exceptionally, surgical or nutritional measures may be required in other patients. Generally, pharmacological agents should be directed towards correcting specific pathophysiological abnormalities, but this is not always possible. Symptomatic relief may be achieved on an empirical basis. Long term treatment may often require the combination of different therapeutic approaches either sequentially or simultaneously.

Distal oesophageal motility characteristics in relation to amplitude of contraction in healthy persons

OBJECTIVES

We wanted to supply a new 'vertical' approach in the analysis of oesophageal contraction data by describing variables of oesophageal function in relation to the amplitude of contraction.

METHODS

Twenty-four-hour oesophageal manometry was performed in 20 healthy volunteers (11 women and 9 men; mean age, 47.5 years). Computer analysis was performed in pressure windows at 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, and 80 mm Hg. Within each window two variables were extracted: the distribution (%) of peristaltic contractions and median duration (sec) of contractions.

RESULTS

The percentage of peristaltic contractions increased with increasing amplitude of contractions during the upright position (15-20 mm Hg window: mean (+/- SD) 68.2% (+/- 13.3%), versus 70-80 mm Hg window: 85.0% (+/- 13.0%) (P < 0.001)) and meal periods (66.9% (+/- 13.8%) versus 92.2% (+/- 11.2%) (P < 0.001)) but not in the supine position (75.9% (+/- 14.6%) versus 73.5% (+/- 16.1%) (P = 0.64)). Contraction duration diminished with increasing contraction amplitude (upright, 15-20 mm Hg window: 3.2 sec (+/- 1.5 sec) versus 70-80 mm Hg window: 1.5 sec (+/- 1.0 sec) ( P < 0.0001); meal: 3.8 sec (+/- 1.7 sec) versus 1.9 sec (+/- 1.1 sec) (P < 0.01); supine: 4.1 sec (+/- 3.0 sec) versus 2.2 (+/- 1.5 sec) (P = 0.03)). The percentage of peristaltic contraction was lower during the supine periods than during meals and upright periods at high amplitudes (70-80 mm Hg window; P < 0.05). The number of contractions decreased linearly on a logarithmic scale with pressure window amplitude.

CONCLUSIONS

Pressure wave amplitude and organization were closely related. Accurate base-line determination and delineation are critical for the interpretation of oesophageal manometric recordings.

Prevalence of esophageal disorders in patients with chest pain newly referred to the cardiologist

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The prevalence of esophageal disorders (dysmotility and/or gastroesophageal reflux) in patients with chest pain newly referred to a cardiologic clinic is unknown. The aims of our study were to investigate the prevalence of esophageal abnormalities in these patients and to assess the value of medical history in predicting the origin of the patient's chest pain.

DESIGN

We evaluated 28 consecutive patients who were newly referred to the cardiologist because of angina-like chest pain. Patients with evidence of severe myocardial ischemia were excluded. Cardiologic evaluation included medical history, physical examination, ECG, and exercise testing; further cardiologic workup was carried out only when considered necessary. Gastroenterologic evaluation consisted of medical history, esophageal manometry, endoscopy, and 24-h ambulatory monitoring of esophageal pH and pressure.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

In five patients a diagnosis of ischemic coronary artery disease was made. In only two of these five patients, the cardiologic history strongly suggested a cardiac origin of the pain. Twelve patients had a pathologic 24-h pH profile, four of whom also had reflux esophagitis. Ten patients had symptomatic reflux. In only three of these ten patients, the history was judged to be indicative of an esophageal origin of the chest pain. No motility disorders were found.

CONCLUSIONS

Thirty-six percent of the patients with chest pain newly referred to a cardiologic out-patient clinic have symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux. Neither cardiologic nor gastroenterologic history data have a high predictive value with respect to the origin of the chest pain.