carP, a novel gene regulating the transcription of the carbamoylphosphate synthetase operon of Escherichia coli

Increasing Agmatine Production in Escherichia coli through Metabolic Engineering

In this study, to obtain higher agmatine yields using the previously developed E. coli strain AUX4 (JM109 ΔspeC ΔspeF ΔspeB ΔargR), the genes encoding glutamate dehydrogenase (gdhA), glutamine synthetase (glnA), phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (ppc), aspartate aminotransferase (aspC), transhydrogenase (pntAB), and biosynthetic arginine decarboxylase (speA) were sequentially overexpressed by replacing their native promoters with the heterologous strong trp, core-trc, or 5Ptacs promoters to generate the plasmid-free E. coli strain AUX11. The fermentation results obtained using a 3-L bioreactor showed that AUX11 produced 2.93 g L^-1 agmatine with the yield of 0.29 g agmatine g^-1 glucose in the batch fermentation, and the fed-batch fermentation of AUX11 allowed the production of 40.43 g L^-1 agmatine with the productivity of 1.26 g L^-1 h^-1 agmatine. The results showed that the engineered E. coli strain AUX11 can be used for the industrial fermentative production of agmatine.

Regulation of carbamoylphosphate synthesis in Escherichia coli: an amazing metabolite at the crossroad of arginine and pyrimidine biosynthesis

In all organisms, carbamoylphosphate (CP) is a precursor common to the synthesis of arginine and pyrimidines. In Escherichia coli and most other Gram-negative bacteria, CP is produced by a single enzyme, carbamoylphosphate synthase (CPSase), encoded by the carAB operon. This particular situation poses a question of basic physiological interest: what are the metabolic controls coordinating the synthesis and distribution of this high-energy substance in view of the needs of both pathways? The study of the mechanisms has revealed unexpected moonlighting gene regulatory activities of enzymes and functional links between mechanisms as diverse as gene regulation and site-specific DNA recombination. At the level of enzyme production, various regulatory mechanisms were found to cooperate in a particularly intricate transcriptional control of a pair of tandem promoters. Transcription initiation is modulated by an interplay of several allosteric DNA-binding transcription factors using effector molecules from three different pathways (arginine, pyrimidines, purines), nucleoid-associated factors (NAPs), trigger enzymes (enzymes with a second unlinked gene regulatory function), DNA remodeling (bending and wrapping), UTP-dependent reiterative transcription initiation, and stringent control by the alarmone ppGpp. At the enzyme level, CPSase activity is tightly controlled by allosteric effectors originating from different pathways: an inhibitor (UMP) and two activators (ornithine and IMP) that antagonize the inhibitory effect of UMP. Furthermore, it is worth noticing that all reaction intermediates in the production of CP are extremely reactive and unstable, and protected by tunneling through a 96 Å long internal channel.

Biosynthesis of Arginine and Polyamines

Early investigations on arginine biosynthesis brought to light basic features of metabolic regulation. The most significant advances of the last 10 to 15 years concern the arginine repressor, its structure and mode of action in both E. coli and Salmonella typhimurium, the sequence analysis of all arg structural genes in E. coli and Salmonella typhimurium, the resulting evolutionary inferences, and the dual regulation of the carAB operon. This review provides an overall picture of the pathways, their interconnections, the regulatory circuits involved, and the resulting interferences between arginine and polyamine biosynthesis. Carbamoylphosphate is a precursor common to arginine and the pyrimidines. In both Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, it is produced by a single synthetase, carbamoylphosphate synthetase (CPSase), with glutamine as the physiological amino group donor. This situation contrasts with the existence of separate enzymes specific for arginine and pyrimidine biosynthesis in Bacillus subtilis and fungi. Polyamine biosynthesis has been particularly well studied in E. coli, and the cognate genes have been identified in the Salmonella genome as well, including those involved in transport functions. The review summarizes what is known about the enzymes involved in the arginine pathway of E. coli and S. enterica serovar Typhimurium; homologous genes were identified in both organisms, except argF (encoding a supplementary OTCase), which is lacking in Salmonella. Several examples of putative enzyme recruitment (homologous enzymes performing analogous functions) are also presented.

Insights into the architecture and stoichiometry of Escherichia coli PepA*DNA complexes involved in transcriptional control and site-specific DNA recombination by atomic force microscopy

Multifunctional Aminopeptidase A (PepA) from Escherichia coli is involved in the control of two distinct DNA transaction processes: transcriptional repression of the carAB operon, encoding carbamoyl phosphate synthase and site-specific resolution of ColE1-type plasmid multimers. Both processes require communication at a distance along a DNA molecule and PepA is the major structural component of the nucleoprotein complexes that underlie this communication. Atomic Force Microscopy was used to analyze the architecture of PepA·carAB and PepA·cer site complexes. Contour length measurements, bending angle analyses and volume determinations demonstrate that the carP1 operator is foreshortened by ∼235 bp through wrapping around one PepA hexamer. The highly deformed part of the operator extends from slightly upstream of the –35 hexamer of the carP1 promoter to just downstream of the IHF-binding site, and comprises the binding sites for the PurR and RutR transcriptional regulators. This extreme remodeling of the carP1 control region provides a straightforward explanation for the strict requirement of PepA in the establishment of pyrimidine and purine-specific repression of carAB transcription. We further provide a direct physical proof that PepA is able to synapse two cer sites in direct repeat in a large interwrapped nucleoprotein complex, likely comprising two PepA hexamers.

Mutagenesis of PepA suggests a new model for the Xer/cer synaptic complex

PepA is an aminopeptidase and also functions as a DNA-binding protein in two unrelated systems in Escherichia coli: Xer site-specific recombination and transcriptional regulation of carAB. In these systems, PepA binds to and brings together distant segments of DNA to form interwrapped, nucleosome-like structures. Here we report the selection of PepA mutants that were unable to support efficient Xer recombination. These mutants were defective in DNA-binding and in transcriptional regulation of carAB, but had normal peptidase activity. The mutations define extended patches of basic residues on the surface of the N-terminal domain of PepA that flank a previously proposed DNA-binding groove in the C-terminal domain of PepA. Our results suggest that DNA passes through this C-terminal groove in the PepA hexamer, and is bound by N-terminal DNA-binding determinants at each end of the groove. Based on our data, we propose a new model for the Xer synaptic complex, in which two recombination sites are wrapped around a single hexamer of PepA, bringing the cross-over sites together for strand exchange by the Xer recombinases. In this model, PepA stabilizes negative plectonemic interwrapping between two segments of DNA by passing one segment through the C-terminal groove while the other is held in place in a loop over the groove.

Structure–function relationships of UMP kinases from pyrH mutants of Gram-negative bacteria

Bacterial uridine monophosphate (UMP) kinases are essential enzymes encoded bypyrHgenes, and conditional-lethal or otherpyrHmutants were analysed with respect to structure–function relationships. A set of thermosensitivepyrHmutants fromEscherichia coliwas generated and studied, along with already describedpyrHmutants fromSalmonella entericaserovar Typhimurium. It is shown that Arg-11 and Gly-232 are key residues for thermodynamic stability of the enzyme, and that Asp-201 is important for both catalysis and allosteric regulation. A comparison of the amino acid sequence of UMP kinases from several prokaryotes showed that these were conserved residues. Discussion on the enzyme activity level in relation to bacterial viability is also presented.

Purine and pyrimidine-specific repression of the Escherichia coli carAB operon are functionally and structurally coupled

Transcription of the carAB operon encoding the sole carbamoylphosphate synthetase of Escherichia coli proceeds from a tandem pair of promoters. P2, downstream, is repressed by arginine and the ArgR protein, whereas P1 is submitted to pyrimidine-specific regulation and as shown here to purine-specific control exerted by binding of the PurR protein to a PUR box sequence centered around nucleotide -128.5 with respect to the start of P1 transcription. In vivo analyses of the effects of trans and cis-acting mutations on the regulatory responses and single round in vitro transcription assays indicated that ligand-bound PurR is by itself unable to inhibit P1 promoter activity. To exert its effect PurR relies on the elaborated nucleoprotein complex that governs P1 activity in a pyrimidine-specific manner. Thus we reveal the existence of an unprecedented functional and structural coupling between the modulation of P1 activity by purine and pyrimidine residues that appears to result from the unique position of the PUR box in the carAB control region, far upstream of the promoter. Missing contact and premethylation binding interference studies revealed the importance of base-specific groups and of structural aspects of the PUR box sequence in complex formation. Permutation assays indicated that the overall PurR-induced bending of the carAB control region is slightly less pronounced than that of the purF operator. The PUR boxes of the carAB operon of E.coli and Salmonella typhimurium are unique in that they have a guanine residue at position eight. Interestingly, guanine at this position has been proposed to be extremely unfavorable on the basis of modeling and binding studies, as its exocyclic amino group would enter into a steric clash with the side-chain of lysine 55. To analyze the effect of guanine at position eight in the upstream half-site of the carAB operator we constructed the adenine derivative and assayed in vivo repressibility of P1 promoter activity and in vitroPurR binding to the mutant operator, and constructed a molecular model for the unusual lysine 55-guanine 8 interaction.

Regulation of arginine biosynthesis in the psychropiezophilic bacterium Moritella profunda: in vivo repressibility and in vitro repressor-operator contact probing

We report the cloning of the arginine repressor gene from the psychropiezophilic Gram-negative bacterium Moritella profunda, the purification of its product (ArgR(Mp)), the identification of the operator in the bipolar argECBFGH(A) operon, in vivo repressibility studies, and an in vitro analysis of the repressor-operator interaction, including binding to mutant and heterologous arginine operators. The ArgR(Mp) subunit shows about 70% amino acid sequence identity with Escherichia coli ArgR (ArgR(Ec)). Binding of purified hexameric ArgR(Mp) to the control region of the divergent operon proved to be arginine-dependent, sequence-specific, and significantly more sensitive to heat than complex formation with ArgR(Ec). ArgR(Mp) binds E.coli arginine operators very efficiently, but hardly recognizes the operator from Bacillus stearothermophilus or Thermotoga maritima. ArgR(Mp) binds to a single site overlapping the -35 element of argC(P), but not argE(P). Therefore, the arrangement of promoter and operator sites in the bipolar argECBFGH(A) operon of M.profunda is very different from the organization of control elements in the bipolar argECBH operon of E.coli, where both promoters overlap the common operator and are equally repressible. We demonstrate that M.profunda argC(P) is about 44-fold repressible, whereas argE(P) is fully constitutive. A high-resolution contact map of the ArgR(Mp)-operator interaction was established by enzymatic and chemical footprinting, missing contact and base-specific premodification binding interference studies. The results indicate that the argC operator consists of two ARG box-like sequences (18bp imperfect palindromes) separated by 3bp. ArgR(Mp) binds to one face of the DNA helix and establishes contacts with two major groove segments and the intervening minor groove of each ARG box, whereas the minor groove segment facing the repressor at the center of the operator remains largely uncontacted. This pattern is reminiscent of complex formation with the repressors of E.coli and B.stearothermophilus, and suggests that each ARG box is contacted by two ArgR subunits belonging to opposite trimers. Moreover, the premodification interference patterns and mutant studies clearly indicate that the inner, center proximal halves of each ARG box in the M.profunda argC operator are more important for complex formation and repression than the outermost halves. A close inspection of sequence conservation and of single base-pair O(c)-type mutations indicate that the same conclusion can be generalized to E.coli operators.

Mutational analysis of Escherichia coli PepA, a multifunctional DNA-binding aminopeptidase

Escherichia coli PepA is a hexameric aminopeptidase that is also endowed with a DNA-binding activity that functions in transcription control and plasmid dimer resolution. To gain further insight into the functioning of PepA, mutants were selected on the basis of reduced repressibility of a genomic carA-lacZ fusion and studied for the various cellular processes requiring PepA, i.e. repression of the carAB operon, autoregulation, resolution of ColE1 multimers, and peptide proteolysis. The methylation status of the carAB control region was analysed in several pepA mutants and purified proteins were assayed in vitro for car operator DNA binding. This study provides a critical test of predictions advanced on the basis of the structural analysis of PepA and demonstrates the importance for DNA binding of several secondary structural elements in the N-terminal domain and near the very C terminus. By analysis of single amino acid substitutions, we could distinguish the mode of PepA action in car regulation from its action in plasmid resolution. We demonstrate that mere binding of PepA to the car control region is not sufficient to explain its role in pyrimidine-specific regulation; protein-protein interactions appear to play an important role in transcriptional repression. The multifunctional character of PepA and of an increasing number of transcriptional regulators that combine catalytic and regulatory properties, of which several participate in the metabolism of arginine and of the pyrimidines, suggests that enzymes and DNA (RNA) binding proteins fulfilling an essential primeval function may have been recruited in evolution to fulfil an additional regulatory task.

Immunochemical analysis of UMP kinase from Escherichia coli

Mono- and polyclonal antibodies directed against UMP kinase from Escherichia coli were tested with the intact protein or with fragments obtained by deletion mutagenesis. As detected in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay tests, the carboxy-terminal quarter of UMP kinase is immunodominant. Polyclonal antibodies inhibited the enzyme activity with partial or total loss of allosteric effects exerted by UTP and GTP, respectively. These data indicate that the UTP and GTP binding sites in UMP kinase are only partially overlapping. One monoclonal antibody (44-2) recognized a linear epitope in UMP kinase between residues 171 and 180. A single substitution (D174N) in this segment of the enzyme abolished its interaction with the monoclonal antibody (44-2). Polyclonal antisera were used to identify UMP kinase in the bacterial proteome. The enzyme appears as a single spot on two-dimensional electrophoresis at a pI of 7.24 and an apparent molecular mass of 26 kDa. Immunogold labeling of UMP kinase in whole E. coli cells shows a localization of the protein near the bacterial membranes. Because the protein does not contain sequences usually required for compartmentalization, the aggregation properties of UMP kinase observed in vitro might play a role in this phenomenon. The specific localization of UMP kinase might also be related to its putative role in cell division.

Linkage map of Escherichia coli K-12, edition 10: the traditional map

This map is an update of the edition 9 map by Berlyn et al. (M. K. B. Berlyn, K. B. Low, and K. E. Rudd, p. 1715-1902, in F. C. Neidhardt et al., ed., Escherichia coli and Salmonella: cellular and molecular biology, 2nd ed., vol. 2, 1996). It uses coordinates established by the completed sequence, expressed as 100 minutes for the entire circular map, and adds new genes discovered and established since 1996 and eliminates those shown to correspond to other known genes. The latter are included as synonyms. An alphabetical list of genes showing map location, synonyms, the protein or RNA product of the gene, phenotypes of mutants, and reference citations is provided. In addition to genes known to correspond to gene sequences, other genes, often older, that are described by phenotype and older mapping techniques and that have not been correlated with sequences are included.

pyrH-encoded UMP-kinase directly participates in pyrimidine-specific modulation of promoter activity in Escherichia coli

The carAB operon of the enterics Escherichia coli K-12 and Salmonella typhimurium LT2, encoding the sole carbamoylphosphate synthetase (CPSase) of these organisms, is transcribed from two promoters in tandem, carP1 upstream and carP2 downstream, repressed respectively by pyrimidines and arginine. We present evidence that the pyrH gene product (the hexameric UMP-kinase) directly participates in the pyrimidine-specific control of carP1 activity. Indeed, we have isolated in E. coli a particular type of pyrH mutation (pyrH41) that retains a quasi-normal UMP-kinase activity, but yet is impaired in the pyrimidine-specific repression of the P1 promoter of the carAB operon of E. coli and of S. typhimurium. Moreover, the pyrimidine-dependent inhibition of in vivo Dam methylase modification of adenine -106 upstream of the carP1 promoter is altered in this pyrH mutant. The recessive pyrH41 allele bears a single C-G to A-T transversion that converts alanine 94 into glutamic acid (A94E). Although overexpression of pyrH41 results in UMP-kinase levels far above that of a wild-type strain, pyrimidine-specific repression of the carAB operon is not restored under these conditions. Similarly, overexpression of the UMP-CMP-kinase gene of Dictyostelium discoideum in the pyrH41 mutant does not restore pyrimidine-mediated control of carP1 promoter activity, in spite of the elevated UMP-kinase activity measured in such transformants. These results indicate that besides its catalytic function in the de novo pyrimidine biosynthesis, E. coli UMP-kinase fulfils an additional, but previously unrecognized role in the regulation of the carAB operon. UMP-kinase might function as the real sensor of the internal pyrimidine nucleotide pool and act in concert with the integration host factor (IHF) and aminopeptidase A (PepA alias CarP and XerB) in the elaboration of the complex nucleoprotein structure required for pyrimidine-specific repression of carP1 promoter activity.

The arginine repressor of Escherichia coli K-12 makes direct contacts to minor and major groove determinants of the operators

In order to gain further insight into the molecular mechanism of arginine-dependent operator recognition by the hexameric Escherichia coli arginine repressor we have probed protein-DNA interactions in vitro and in vivo. We have extensively applied the chemical modification-protection and premodification-interference approach to two operators, the natural operator overlapping the P2 promoter of the carAB operon and a fully symmetrical consensus sequence. Backbone contacts were revealed by hydroxyl radical footprinting and phosphate ethylation interference. Base-specific contacts to purines and pyrimidines were revealed by methylation protection and premodification interference, KMnO4 and NH2OH.HCl-specific modification of thymine and cytosine residues, base-removal (depurination and depyrimidation), and base substitution (uracil and inosine). Additional information on the groove specificity of repressor binding was obtained by small ligand binding interference (distamycin and methyl green). In vivo, we measured the effects on the repressibility of 24 single base-pair substitutions obtained by saturation mutagenesis of half an Arg box in the carAB operator. The results of these experiments point to the conclusion that a hexameric arginine repressor molecule covers four turns of the helix, makes base-specific contacts to at least one guanine (G4 or G4') and two thymine (T3, T13', or T3', T13) residues in each one of four consecutive major grooves on one face of the helix and with four A-T/T-A base-pairs, comprising the adenine residues A9, 9', 12, 12' and the thymine residues T10, 10', 11, 11', in the two outermost minor grooves of the operator, on the very same face of the DNA molecule. The hydrophobic 5-methyl groups of four thymine residues (T3, 3', 13, 13') in each Arg box contribute to major groove-specific recognition via hydrophobic and/or van der Waals interactions. The importance of minor groove contacts was further supported by the drastic effect of distamycin binding interference. In vivo, the most pronounced drops in repressibility were occasioned by mutations at positions 10 (A-->G or C), 11 (T-->A or G) and 12 (A-->G, T or C).

On the role of the Escherichia coli integration host factor (IHF) in repression at a distance of the pyrimidine specific promoter P1 of the carAB operon

Binding of integration host factor to its target site, centered around nucleotide -305 upstream of the transcription startpoint, exerts antagonistic effects on the expression of P1, the upstream pyrimidine specific promoter of the E coli and S typhimurium carAB operons. IHF stimulates P1 promoter activity in minimal medium, but also increases the repressibility of this promoter by pyrimidines. We present evidence strongly suggesting that IHF exerts these effects by modulating the binding of another pyrimidine specific regulatory molecule, probably the product of gene carP. The carAB control region contains a GATC Dam methylation site, 106 bp upstream of the P1 transcription startpoint, which can be protected in vivo against methylation. This protection requires at least the regulatory carP gene product and a high pyrimidine nucleotide pool and, as shown here, the integration host factor. Whether CarP directly binds to this site or exerts its protective effect indirectly is not yet known. In the absence of IHF (himA) or in mutants affected in the IHF target site this protection is strongly impaired, suggesting that IHF positively influences the formation or the stability of the protective protein-DNA complex some 200 bp downstream. Furthermore, we have demonstrated that the distance separating the IHF and GATC Dam methylase target sites is crucial for the in vivo protection and for pyrimidine mediated regulation of P1 promoter expression. Indeed, shortening this distance by 6 bp, and more surprisingly also by 11 bp, results in a severe reduction of the degree of in vivo protection of the GATC site against methylation and concomitantly of the repressibility by pyrimidines of P1 promoter activity. The absence of both these effects in a double, deletion-duplication, mutant resulting in a net increase of the intervening sequence by 1 bp, clearly demonstrates that these effects are not due to the disruption of an important regulatory site, but must be attributed to variations in the distance separating different protein binding sites.

Integration host factor (IHF) modulates the expression of the pyrimidine-specific promoter of the carAB operons of Escherichia coli K12 and Salmonella typhimurium LT2

We report the identification of Integration Host Factor (IHF) as a new element involved in modulation of P1, the upstream pyrimidine-specific promoter of the Escherichia coli K12 and Salmonella typhimurium carAB operons. Band-shift assays, performed with S-30 extracts of the wild type and a himA, hip double mutant or with purified IHF demonstrate that, in vitro, this factor binds to a region 300 bp upstream of the transcription initiation site of P1 in both organisms. This was confirmed by deletion analysis of the target site. DNase I, hydroxyl radical and dimethylsulphate footprinting experiments allowed us to allocate the IHF binding site to a 38 bp, highly A+T-rich stretch, centred around nucleotide -305 upstream of the transcription initiation site. Protein-DNA contacts are apparently spread over a large number of bases and are mainly located in the minor groove of the helix. Measurements of carbamoyl-phosphate synthetase (CPSase) and beta-galactosidase specific activities from car-lacZ fusion constructs of wild type or IHF target site mutants introduced into several genetic backgrounds affected in the himA gene or in the pyrimidine-mediated control of P1 (carP6 or pyrH+/-), or in both, indicate that, in vivo, IHF influences P1 activity as well as its control by pyrimidines. IHF stimulates P1 promoter activity in minimal medium, but increases the repressibility of this promoter by pyrimidines. These antagonistic effects result in a two- to threefold reduction in the repressibility of promoter P1 by pyrimidines in the absence of IHF binding. IHF thus appears to be required for maximal expression as well as for establishment of full repression. IHF could exert this function by modulating the binding of a pyrimidine-specific regulatory molecule.

Arginine regulon of Escherichia coli K-12. A study of repressor-operator interactions and of in vitro binding affinities versus in vivo repression

The 12 genes which in E. coli K-12 constitute the arginine regulon are organized in nine transcriptional units all of which contain in their 5' non-coding region two 18 bp partially conserved imperfect palindromes (ARG boxes) which are the target sites for binding of the repressor, a hexameric protein. In vitro binding experiments with purified repressor (a gift from W. K. Maas) were performed on the operator sites of four genes, argA, argD, argF, argG, and of two operons, carAb and the bipolar argECBH cluster. A compilation of results obtained by DNase I and hydroxyl radical footprinting clearly indicates that in each case the repressor binds symmetrically to four helical turns covering adjacent pairs of boxes separated by 3 bp, but to one face of the DNA only. Methylation protection experiments bring to light major base contacts with four highly conserved G residues symmetrically distributed in four consecutive major grooves. Symmetrical contacts in the minor groove with A residues have also been identified. Stoichiometry experiments suggest that a single hexameric repressor molecule binds to a pair of adjacent ARG boxes. Although the wild-type operator consists of a pair of adjacent ARG boxes separated by 3 bp (except argR where there are only 2 bp), repressor can bind to a single box but with a greatly reduced affinity. Therefore, adjacent boxes behave co-operatively with respect to the Arg repressor binding, in the sense that the presence of one box largely stimulates the binding of the properly located second box. The optimal distance separating two boxes is 3 bp, but one bp more or less does not abolish this stimulation effect. However, it is completely abolished by the introduction of two or more additional bp unless a full helical turn is introduced. Large variations in the in vivo repression response between individual arginine genes or a wild-type gene and cognate Oc type mutants are not reflected by similar differences in the in vitro binding results where only small differences are observed. The significance of this lack of correlation is discussed.

Control site location and transcriptional regulation in Escherichia coli

The regulatory regions for 119 Escherichia coli promoters have been analyzed, and the locations of the regulatory sites have been cataloged. The following observations emerge. (i) More than 95% of promoters are coregulated with at least one other promoter. (ii) Virtually all sigma 70 promoters contain at least one regulatory site in a proximal position, touching at least position -65 with respect to the start point of transcription. There are not yet clear examples of upstream regulation in the absence of a proximal site. (iii) Operators within regulons appear in very variable proximal positions. By contrast, the proximal activation sites of regulons are much more fixed. (iv) There is a forbidden zone for activation elements downstream from approximately position -20 with respect to the start of transcription. By contrast, operators can occur throughout the proximal region. When activation elements appear in the forbidden zone, they repress. These latter examples usually involve autoregulation. (v) Approximately 40% of repressible promoters contain operator duplications. These occur either in certain regulons where duplication appears to be a requirement for repressor action or in promoters subject to complex regulation. (vi) Remote operator duplications occur in approximately 10% of repressible promoters. They generally appear when a multiple promoter region is coregulated by cyclic AMP receptor protein. (vii) Sigma 54 promoters do not require proximal or precisely positioned activator elements and are not generally subject to negative regulation. Rationales are presented for all of the above observations.

Molecular interactions in the control region of the carAB operon encoding Escherichia coli carbamoylphosphate synthetase

The control region of the carAB operon, encoding carbamoylphosphate synthetase, comprises two tandem promoters (P1, upstream and P2, downstream) located 67 base-pairs apart and repressed respectively by pyrimidines and arginine. RNA polymerase and pure arginine repressor bind to the P2 region in mutually exclusive ways. Repressor protects the two adjacent palindromic ARG boxes overlapping P2 against DNase I. Binding of RNA polymerase to P1 is abnormal; the region protected against DNase I is shifted upstream by about 20 nucleotides with respect to the position expected from the transcription startpoint. This pattern is not due to interference with polymerase binding at P2, since it is observed also in the presence of repressor and on an isolated P1 region. Binding of RNA polymerase is relatively weak and heparin-sensitive suggesting that, in vivo, an ancillary factor is required to promote the formation of an open complex. S1 nuclease mapping experiments show that the simultaneous presence of pyrimidines and arginine represses the downstream arginine-specific promoter (P2) more efficiently than arginine alone. This effect is not due to a direct regulatory interaction between pyrimidines and P2, since it is not observed when P1 is inactivated by insertion mutations or partial deletion. It has been shown that transcription initiated at P1 can proceed even when arginine represses P2. We therefore suggest that P2 operator-arginine repressor complex is destabilized by RNA polymerase binding at P1 or transcription from P1. We describe a novel technique to select for expression-down mutants in a lac fusion context.