Visual field effects for processing content and function words

Anticipation in turn-taking: mechanisms and information sources

During conversations participants alternate smoothly between speaker and hearer roles with only brief pauses and overlaps. There are two competing types of accounts about how conversationalists accomplish this: (a) the signaling approach and (b) the anticipatory (‘projection’) approach. We wanted to investigate, first, the relative merits of these two accounts, and second, the relative contribution of semantic and syntactic information to the timing of next turn initiation. We performed three button-press experiments using turn fragments taken from natural conversations to address the following questions: (a) Is turn-taking predominantly based on anticipation or on reaction, and (b) what is the relative contribution of semantic and syntactic information to accurate turn-taking. In our first experiment we gradually manipulated the information available for anticipation of the turn end (providing information about the turn end in advance to completely removing linguistic information). The results of our first experiment show that the distribution of the participants’ estimation of turn-endings for natural turns is very similar to the distribution for pure anticipation. We conclude that listeners are indeed able to anticipate a turn-end and that this strategy is predominantly used in turn-taking. In Experiment 2 we collected purely reacted responses. We used the distributions from Experiments 1 and 2 together to estimate a new dependent variable called Reaction Anticipation Proportion. We used this variable in our third experiment where we manipulated the presence vs. absence of semantic and syntactic information by low-pass filtering open-class and closed class words in the turn. The results suggest that for turn-end anticipation, both semantic and syntactic information are needed, but that the semantic information is a more important anticipation cue than syntactic information.

Distinguishable neural correlates of verbs and nouns: a MEG study on homonyms

The dissociability of nouns and verbs and of their morphosyntactic operations has been firmly established by lesion data. However, the hypothesis that they are processed by distinct neural substrates is inconsistently supported by neuroimaging studies. We tackled this issue in a silent reading experiment during MEG. Participants silently read noun/verb homonyms in minimal syntactic context: article-noun (NPs), pronoun-verb (VPs) (e.g., il ballo/i balli, the dance/the dances; io ballo/tu balli, I dance/you dance). Homonyms allow to rule out prelexical or postlexical nuisance factors-they are orthographically and phonologically identical, but serve different grammatical functions depending on context. Under these experimental conditions, different activity to nouns and verbs can be confidently attributed to representational/processing distinctions. At the sensor level, three components of event-related magnetic fields were observed for the function word and four for the content word, but Global Field Power (GFP) analysis only showed differences between VPs and NPs at several but very short time windows. By contrast, source level analysis based on Minimum Norm Estimates (MNE) yielded significantly greater activity for VPs in left frontal areas and in a left frontoparietal network at late time windows (380-397 and 393-409 ms). These results are fully consistent with lesion data, and show that verbs and nouns are processed differently in the brain. Frontal and parietal activation to verbs might correspond to morphosyntactic processes and to working memory recruitment (or thematic role assignment), respectively. Findings are consistent with the view that nouns and verbs and their morphosyntactic operations involve at least partially distinct neural substrates. However, they do not entirely rule out that nouns and verbs are processed in a shared neural substrate, and that differences result from greater complexity of verbal morphosyntax.

Orthographic and Phonological Facilitation from Unattended Words: Evidence for Bilateral Processing

This study investigated hemisphere differences in sensitivity to orthographic and phonological similarity using a task that did not require deliberate metalinguistic comparisons between words. Two experiments investigated the influence of an unattended distractor item on the pronunciation of target words in the right visual field (RVF) and left visual field (LVF) in neurologically intact persons. Word and pseudoword distractors that were both orthographically and phonologically similar to the target word produced equivalent facilitation across visual fields (Exp. 1). When orthographic and phonological influences were separated in Exp. 2, each dimension produced reliable facilitation, and to the same extent in each visual field. These results, and others in the literature, are difficult to reconcile with the view that the intact right hemisphere is completely unable to access phonology from print. If subsequent research confirms these findings, it would suggest that passive activation of phonology in reading can be dissociated from articulatory mechanisms, and that left hemisphere superiority in some phonological judgements may depend more on the availability of articulatory rehearsal than on privileged access to phonological codes.

Event Related Potentials (Erp) and Behavioral Measurements to Verbal Stimulation of Visual Fields

Event related potentials (ERP) to visually presented linguistic stimuli were examined using a lexical-decision task and an oddball paradigm. Stimuli were presented to the central, right or left visual fields (CVF, RVF and LVF) and generated ERP with very clear N100-P300 components. The question addressed was whether there is ERP evidence for left hemisphere (LH) superiority in linguistic discrimination as reported behaviorally. Nineteen young, right-handed male subjects participated. The main factor influencing the latency and amplitude of N100 was that of contralateral versus ipsilateral stimulation. Shorter N100 latency and larger amplitude were recorded over the hemisphere contralateral to the visual field stimulated. In contrast, the factors influencing the P300 parameters were the visual field stimulated and the hemisphere over which the ERP was recorded. P300 amplitude was significantly larger and P300 latency significantly shorter over the LH than over the RH. Significantly shorter P300 latency and larger peak amplitude were found for RVF than for LVF stimulation.

Hemispheric differences for identification of words and nonwords in urdu-English bilinguals

Hemispheric asymmetry was examined for Urdu-English bilinguals identifying printed Urdu words and nonwords, separated Urdu letter strings, digits, and English nonwords. In all cases, fewer errors occurred when stimuli were presented to the right visual field/left hemisphere (RVF/LH) than to the left visual field/right hemisphere (LVF/RH). Qualitative error patterns suggested that separated Urdu letter strings were processed more serially than Urdu letter strings joined to form words or pronounceable nonwords and more serially on RVF/LH than on LVF/RH trials. This qualitative laterality effect is similar to that found for Hebrew and Arabic but opposite that found for English and suggests that the qualitative manner of processing printed verbal material is influenced by language-specific factors such as scanning direction, orthographic-to-phonological mapping rules, and morphology.

Theta responses are involved in lexical-semantic retrieval during language processing

Oscillatory neuronal dynamics, observed in the human electroencephalogram (EEG) during language processing, have been related to the dynamic formation of functionally coherent networks that serve the role of integrating the different sources of information needed for understanding the linguistic input. To further explore the functional role of oscillatory synchrony during language processing, we quantified event-related EEG power changes induced by the presentation of open-class (OC) words and closed-class (CC) words in a wide range of frequencies (from 1 to 30 Hz), while subjects read a short story. Word presentation induced three oscillatory components: a theta power increase (4-7 Hz), an alpha power decrease (10-12 Hz), and a beta power decrease (16-21 Hz). Whereas the alpha and beta responses showed mainly quantitative differences between the two word classes, the theta responses showed qualitative differences between OC words and CC words: A theta power increase was found over left temporal areas for OC words, but not for CC words. The left temporal theta increase may index the activation of a network involved in retrieving the lexical-semantic properties of the OC items.

Hemispheric asymmetry for word naming: effects of frequency and regularity of pronunciation

Observers named visually presented words as quickly as possible when the words were presented to the centre of a viewing screen (Experiments 1, 5, and 6) or were flashed to either the left visual field/right hemisphere (LVF/RH) or right visual field/left hemisphere (RVF/LH) on each trial (Experiments, 2, 3, and 4). Words varied in frequency of occurrence in the language and in regularity of pronunciation. On lateralised trials, there was a RVF/LH advantage for both error rate and reaction time, with this hemispheric asymmetry for word naming being independent of both frequency and regularity. The RVF/LH advantage was also independent of whether the letters within a word were arranged horizontally or vertically. Error rates and reaction times were lower for high-than for low-frequency words and lower for words with a regular pronunciation than for exception words. In addition, on centre trials the effects of regularity were larger for low-frequency words than for high-frequency words. However, when words were presented in the visual periphery, the effects of regularity were of the same magnitude for high-and low-frequency words. In view of the theoretical importance of the Frequency by Regularity interaction, this latter result suggests that word processing is qualitatively different in the visual periphery than in the centre of vision; indicating that perceptual asymmetries in a typical visual half-field experiment may be limited in what they can tell us about the relative contributions of the two hemispheres to processing words in the centre of vision.

ERPs to words--effect of gender and site of recording electrode

Event-related potentials (ERPs) to word stimuli were registered in 20 twenty-one-year-old students (7 males and 13 females) of the Faculty of Medicine of Palacký University. In an ideal case in the first 800 ms after the onset of stimulus ERP consists of three clear positive and four negative waves. The amplitude of some waves of ERPs shows a high degree of inter-individual variability. It was also revealed that the latency and amplitude of some ERPs waves to word stimuli depends on the gender and on the site of the registration electrode on the scalp of the subject. Latencies of components LP2 and LN4 in all electrodes are shorter in females than in males, component LN2 behaves reversely--its latency is shorter in males. On the other hand, the amplitude of dependent variables BP2, BN2 and PV1 is in most electrodes higher in females than in males--except for the amplitude of components BP4 and BN1.

The effect of orthographic uniqueness and deviation points on lexical decisions: evidence from unilateral and bilateral-redundant presentations

Words with an early or late orthographic uniqueness point and nonwords with an early or late orthographic deviation point were presented to the left, right, or both visual fields simultaneously. In Experiment 1, 20 participants made lexical decision judgements to horizontal stimulus presentations. In Experiment 2, a further 20 participants completed the task using vertical presentations to control for attentional biases. Consistent with previous research, words with earlier orthographic uniqueness points prompted faster responses across visual fields, regardless of stimulus orientation. Although research has suggested that the left hemisphere's superiority for language processing stems from a comparatively parallel processing strategy, with the right hemisphere reliant upon a serial mechanism, left and right visual field presentations were not differentially affected by orthographic uniqueness point. This suggests that differential sequential effects previously reported result during processes other than retrieval from the lexicon. The overall right visual field advantage observed using horizontal presentations disappeared when stimuli were presented vertically. Contrary to expectations, there was a facilitatory effect of late orthographic deviation point for horizontal nonword presentations. Overall, the results were interpreted as being consistent with predictions of a cohort model of word recognition, and they highlighted the effect of stimulus orientation on left and right hemisphere word recognition.

Memory traces for inflectional affixes as shown by mismatch negativity

Mismatch negativity (MMN), an index of experience-dependent memory traces, was used to investigate the processing of grammatical affixes in the human brain. The MMN was elicited by either a verb stem or an inflected verb form, phonetic contrasts being identical in both conditions. The topography of the mismatch responses showed clear left-hemispheric laterality in both conditions. However, the MMN to the inflected form occurred later than that for the stem. Furthermore, the inflected stimulus produced MMN maximal in centroparietal sites, whereas stem-elicited MMN was more profound at more frontal sites. We suggest that these features of the MMN to inflected form indicate delayed activation of left-lateralized perisylvian cell assemblies that function as cortical memory traces of inflectional affixes.

Does global context modulate cerebral asymmetries? A review and new evidence on word imageability effects

In this article we examine whether the distribution of function across the right and left cerebral hemispheres for lexical processing is influenced by the global context within which words are presented. A review of previously published studies indicates that the ubiquitous right visual field (RVF)/left hemisphere advantage for word recognition may be reduced or eliminated for nouns, content words, or high image words, but only when such items are presented along with verbs, function words, or low image words. However, paradoxically, when the former items are presented in more homogeneous contexts, the RVF advantage is uniformly observed. We propose that the processing efficiency of a hemisphere for a given stimulus depends on that item's relation to the other stimuli provided, that is, the global context. This was examined in a visual half-field experiment that varied whether high and low image nouns were presented in homogeneous (blocked lists) or heterogeneous (mixed lists) contexts. An unvarying RVF advantage was observed for high image words in homogeneous contexts, but this advantage was eliminated when the same items were presented in heterogeneous contexts. We suggest that stimulus heterogeneity maximizes reliance on differing, but complementary, computational biases across hemispheres. Hence, the extent to which the left and right hemispheres are recruited for the recognition of individual word types can vary dynamically with variation in the stimulus environment.

The event-related potentials elicited by content and function words during the reading of sentences by patients with schizophrenia

Thought disorder is one of the main symptoms observed in schizophrenia and has been investigated in terms of language dysfunction. The purpose of the present study was to find whether there were any differences in identifying and processing between content (semantic) and function (syntax) words, and to elucidate whether semantic or syntax is more impaired for the schizophrenics. Event-related potentials were recorded in 13 patients with schizophrenia and 14 healthy controls, while they silently read three sets of passages. Event-related potentials were recorded for content words (noun, verb) and function words (auxiliary verb, particle) separately. For the healthy control group, the mean amplitude of P200 for the content word class was greater than for the function word class with fronto-central dominance. In contrast, no such difference was found for the schizophrenics mainly due to the reduction of P200 amplitude of the content words. Larger P200 for the content than the function word class suggests that greater resources were used to identify the content words. Lack of this difference found in patients with schizophrenia suggested that the disturbances in the semantics may be more attributable to the linguistic impairment than those in the syntax.

Semantic processing of open- and closed-class words: an event-related potentials study

Previous research on open- and closed-class words has revealed the existence of several differences in the processing of these types of vocabulary. In this paper the processing of open- and closed-class words was compared by means of an early electrical brain response, recognition potential (RP), which indexes semantic processing and originates from basal extrastriate areas. The effects of word frequency on closed-class words were also investigated. For these purposes, open- and closed-class words, among other stimuli, were presented by means of the rapid stream stimulation procedure. Results showed that there were no significant differences when comparing the RP evoked by open- and closed-class words in the left hemisphere. However, in the right hemisphere this situation changed: the RP evoked by open- and closed-class words did differ. Moreover, there were no differences between the RP evoked by closed-class words and pseudowords. These patterns of results suggest that the semantic processing of closed-class words shares some aspects with the processing of open-class words, despite the existence of some differences. Thus, whereas the semantic processing of open-class words recruits brain areas of both hemispheres, the semantic processing of closed-class words is left-lateralized. A second purpose of this work is to study word-frequency effects on closed-class words. Our results show the insensitivity of closed-class words to word-frequency effects.

Differences in brain potentials to open and closed class words: class and frequency effects

Closed class (determiners, pronouns, conjunctions, prepositions etc. ) and open class (nouns, verbs, adjectives, adverbs) words have different linguistic functions and have been proposed to be processed by different neural systems. Here, event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded in young German-speaking subjects while they read closed class and open class words flashed upon a video-screen. In the first experiment closed class words were sorted into four different frequency categories and open class words into three categories. The words were presented in a list with the subjects' task to detect occasional non-words. A centroparietal negativity (N400) with a peak latency of about 400 ms varied in amplitude as a function of frequency in both classes. The N400 in closed class items, however, was considerably smaller than that in open class words of similar frequency. A left anterior negativity (N280/LPN) showed some degree of frequency-sensitivity regardless of word class. Only for the very high frequency closed class words a frontal negativity with an onset of about 400 ms was obtained (N400-700). This N400-700 effect was replicated in the second study, in which medium frequency closed and open class words and very high frequency closed class words were presented at the fifth position of simple German sentences. It is suggested that neither N400 nor the left anterior negativity (N280/LPN) distinguish qualitatively between the two word classes and thus claims about different brain systems involved in the processing of open and closed class words are not substantiated electrophysiologically. The N400-700 effect is possibly related to specific grammatical functions of some closed class items, such as determiners.

Hemispheric specialization for reading

Behavioral laterality tasks with linguistic stimuli were used to assess the differential processing efficiencies of the cerebral hemispheres in right- and left-handed adults. Findings from a lateralized lexical decision task with concrete nouns supported Zaidel's (1983) "direct access" model of hemispheric functioning. A dual task consisting of oral and silent reading indicated that the right hand was significantly more disrupted than the left during unimanual finger tapping; however, some bilateral interference was observed. Taken together the findings suggest that although the left hemisphere was relatively more efficient, the right hemisphere was dynamically involved in the reading process.

Operant conditioning of left-hemispheric slow cortical potentials and its effect on word processing

This study investigated whether language-related cognitive processes can be modified by learned modulation of cortical activity. Study participants received feedback of slow cortical potentials (SCPs) recorded above left-hemispheric language cortices and were reinforced for producing negative and positive shifts upon two different discriminative stimuli. In all subjects who achieved reliable control of left-hemispheric brain responses, substantial modification of word processing was observed. Behavioral modification could be documented in two experiments in which word probes were presented following discriminative stimuli. When negative shifts of the EEG were required, lexical decisions on words were substantially speeded, while they were slowed during positivity conditions. There was no indication for any performance difference between conditions in control subjects who failed to achieve control over SCPs after feedback training. This result was replicated in an experiment using lateralized-tachistoscopic stimulus presentation. Comparisons of word and pseudoword responses in both experiments indicated that behavioral modification was most pronounced for word responses. It was also not seen in a simple reaction time task not involving language materials. This argues against a global effect related to perception, visuo-spatial attention, or motor processes. We conclude that linguistic processes can be influenced by modification of cortical activity due to operant conditioning. In closing, tentative explanations of the present results based on theories of language and attention processes are being discussed.

Developmental trends in right hemispheric participation in reading

Behavioral laterality tasks assessed the differential processing efficiencies of the cerebral hemispheres in younger and older reading-age children. Lateralized lexical decision task findings supported a "direct access" model of hemispheric processing for the younger children whereas the older children demonstrated a "callosal relay" pattern. A dual-task with oral and silent reading indicated that the right hand was significantly more disrupted than the left during unimanual finger tapping. The findings suggest that although the left hemisphere's involvement during reading is developmentally stable, the involvement of the right hemisphere appears to change dynamically as reading experience increases.

Hemispheric asymmetry in lexical decisions: the effects of grammatical class and imageability

It has been suggested that neural systems for lexical processing of nouns and verbs are anatomically distinct. The aim of the present study was to investigate if brain asymmetry for the processing of these two grammatical classes is also different. Neurologically intact adults performed a lateralized lexical decision task with grammatically unambiguous words of high, medium, and low degrees of imagery. For error scores a right visual field (RVF) advantage and an overall effect of imageability were obtained. For latency scores grammatical class and imageability modified visual field differences: in the noun class a RVF advantage was obtained only for low imagery nouns, while for the verbs the RVF advantage was present for both medium and low imagery verbs. These results suggest that the participation of right hemisphere neural systems in the processing of verbs is more limited than in the processing of nouns.

Electrophysiological Signatures of Visual Lexical Processing: Open-and Closed-Class Words

n This paper presents evidence of the disputed existence of an electrophysiological marker for the lexical-categorical distinction between open-and closed-class words. Event-related brain potentials were recorded from the scalp while subjects read a story. Separate waveforms were computed for open-and closed-class words. Two aspects of the waveforms could be reliably related to vocabulary class. The first was an early negativity in the 230-to 350-msec epoch, with a bilateral anterior predominance. This negativity was elicited by open-and closed-class words alike, was not affected by word frequency or word length, and had an earlier peak latency for closed-class words.

The second was a frontal slow negative shift in the 350-to 500-msec epoch, largest over the left side of the scalp. This late negativity was only elicited by closed-class words. Although the early negativity cannot serve as a qualitative marker of the open-and closed-class distinction, it does reflect the earliest electrophysiological manifestation of the availability of categorical information from the mental lexicon. These results suggest that the brain honors the distinction between open-and closed-class words, in relation to the different roles that they play in on-line sentence processing.

Multiple simultaneous stimulus presentation facilitates lexical processing

Bilateral presentation of two copies of the same word leads to faster lexical decisions compared to unilateral presentation alone (bilateral gain). This has implications for theories of interhemispheric interaction, because it suggests that, under certain conditions, both hemispheres cooperate rather than inhibit each other or act independently. Experiment 1 confirmed that the bilateral gain is word-specific and does not occur for pseudowords. Whereas the bilateral gain proved to be present for words of different word frequencies, results of Experiment 2 suggest that it is slightly stronger for high-frequency words compared to words of lower frequencies. Experiment 3 revealed that higher numbers of stimuli (two versus four copies of the same word/pseudoword) presented at the same time lead to an additional improvement of word processing. These results support a neurobiological model of word representation assuming that words are cortically represented in widely distributed interhemispheric cell assemblies. Summation of activity in such assemblies leads to faster and more reliable ignition of the network.

Hebb's concept of cell assemblies and the psychophysiology of word processing

Hebb's brain-theoretical approach suggests that tightly connected networks of neurons, Hebbian cell assemblies, are the building blocks of cognitive functions. These assemblies are not necessarily restricted to a small cortical locus but may be dispersed over distant cortical areas. Assemblies with different topographies can be postulated for different kinds of words, such as meaningful content versus grammatical function words or words eliciting motor versus visual associations. Evidence from evoked potentials and gamma-band electrocortical responses elicited by lexical material supports a cell assembly model of language and other higher cognitive functions.

Words and sentences: event-related brain potential measures

Interactions between sentences and the individual words that comprise them are reviewed in studies using the event-related brain potential (ERP). Results suggest that, for ambiguous words preceded by a biasing sentence context, context is used at an early stage to constrain the relevant sense of a word rather than select among multiple active senses. A study comparing associative single-word context and sentence-level context also suggests that sentence context influences the earliest stage of semantic analysis, but that the ability to use sentence context effectively is more demanding of working memory than the ability to use single-word contexts. Another indication that sentence context has a dramatic effect on single-word processing was the observation that high- and low-frequency words elicit different ERPs at the beginnings of sentences but that this effect is suppressed by a meaningful sentence context.

Electrocortical distinction of vocabulary types

Psycholinguistic theories propose that words of the 2 major vocabulary classes, content (open-class) and function (closed-class) words, are computationally distinct and have different neuronal generators. This predicts distinct EEG patterns elicited by words of these 2 classes. To test this prediction, content and function words, together with matched pseudowords, were presented in a lexical decision task (where subjects had to decide whether stimuli were meaningful words or not). Evoked potentials were recorded from 17 electrodes 12 of which were located in close vicinity of the perisylvian cortices. Already 160 msec post stimulus onset, substantial differences in activity patterns distinguish the 2 vocabulary classes. A hemisphere by word class interaction revealed interhemispheric differences for function words but not for content words. Potentials evoked by function words were more negative over the left hemisphere compared to the right. These results evidence that brain mechanisms underlying function and content word processing are different. The following explanation of the data is proposed: content words correspond to neuronal assemblies equally distributed over both hemispheres, while assemblies corresponding to function words are strongly lateralized to the left hemisphere and primarily located in the perisylvian region.

Lexical decision after left, right and bilateral presentation of function words, content words and non-words: evidence for interhemispheric interaction

Function words, content words and pronounceable non-words (pseudowords) were presented tachistoscopically either in the left or the right visual field or with identical copies flashed simultaneously to both visual half-fields. Consistent with earlier studies [10], function words were found to show a right visual field advantage, whereas for content words the right visual field advantage was absent. Compared to either of the unilateral modes of presentation, bilateral presentation of identical word stimuli improved accuracy and latency significantly. The bilateral (Bi) advantage was largest for content words, and was also highly significant for function words in both latency and accuracy. The Bi gain was absent for non-words (significant interaction of Wordness x Visual Field). These results indicate that the lexicons of the left and right hemisphere can "collaborate" rather than inhibit each other or act independently when processing the same linguistic stimuli. Our findings are consistent with the view that the neuronal counterparts of words are Hebbian cell assemblies consisting of strongly connected excitatory neurons of both hemispheres. Since function words show a right visual field advantage in addition to their Bi gain, their assemblies are likely to have most of their neurons located in the left hemisphere. Neuronal assemblies corresponding to content words may be less strongly lateralized.

An Event-Related Potential (ERP) Analysis of Semantic Congruity and Repetition Effects in Sentences

In two experiments, event-related brain potentials (ERPs) and cued-recall performance measures were used to examine the consequences of semantic congruity and repetition on the processing of words in sentences. A set of sentences, half of which ended with words that rendered them semantically incongruous, was repeated either once (eg, Experiment 1) or twice (e.g., Experiment 2). After each block of sentences, subjects were given all of the sentences and asked to recall the missing final words.

Repetition benefited the recall of both congruous and incongruous endings and reduced the amplitude and shortened the duration of the N400 component of the ERP more for (1) incongruous than congruous words, (2) open class than closed class words, and (3) low-frequency than high-frequency open class words. For incongruous sentence terminations, repetition increased the amplitude of a broad positive component subsequent to the N400.

Assuming additive factors logic and a traditional view of the lexicon, our N400 results indicate that in addition to their singular effects, semantic congruiry, repetition, and word frequency converge to influence a common stage of lexical processing. Within a parallel distributed processing framework, our results argue for substantial temporal and spatial overlap in the activation of codes subserving word recognition so as to yield the observed interactions of repetition with semantic congruity, lexical class, and word frequency effects.

Influences of semantic and syntactic context on open- and closed-class words

Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded as subjects read semantically meaningful, syntactically legal but nonsensical and random word strings. The constraints imposed by formal sentence structure alone did not reduce the amplitude of the N400 component elicited by open-class words, whereas semantic constraints did. Semantic constraints also eliminated the word-frequency effect of a larger N400 for low-frequency words. Responses to closed-class words exhibited reduced N400 amplitudes in syntactic and congruent sentences, indicating that formal sentence structure placed greater restrictions on closed-class words than it did on open-class words. However, unlike the open-class results, the impact of sentence context on closed-class words was stable across word positions, suggesting that these syntactic constraints were applied only locally. A second ERP component, distinct from the N400, was elicited primarily by congruent closed-class words.

Dichotic listening indices of right hemisphere semantic processing

A new dichotic listening technique, based on a psychophysical threshold procedure and providing ordinal scale measurement of lateral asymmetry, was used to investigate variation in the size of right-ear advantage for verbal vs manual response modalities across three semantic categories of stimuli in 60 right-handed males. For manual responders, abstract words elicited a significantly greater right-ear advantage than did concrete words, while emotional words elicited a non-significant left-ear advantage. Verbal responders showed no significant difference in the size of right-ear advantage across stimuli. The results suggest that both response modality and stimulus type are important variables for dichotic listening paradigms seeking evidence of right hemisphere contributions to semantic processing.