Early development in mice. VI: Additive and interactive effects of offspring genotype and maternal environments

Insensitivity of the analysis of variance to heredity-environment interaction

It makes sense to attribute a definite percentage of variation in some measure of behavior to variation in heredity only if the effects of heredity and environment are truly additive. Additivity is often tested by examining the interaction effect in a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or its equivalent multiple regression model. If this effect is not statistically significant at the α = 0.05 level, it is common practice in certain fields (e.g., human behavior genetics) to conclude that the two factors really are additive and then to use linear models, which assume additivity. Comparing several simple models of nonadditive, interactive relationships between heredity and environment, however, reveals that ANOVA often fails to detect nonadditivity because it has much less power in tests of interaction than in tests of main effects. Likewise, the sample sizes needed to detect real interactions are substantially greater than those needed to detect main effects. Data transformations that reduce interaction effects also change drastically the properties ofthe causal model and may conceal theoretically interesting and practically useful relationships. If the goal ofpartitioning variance among mutually exclusive causes and calculating “heritability” coefficients is abandoned, interactive relationships can be examined more seriously and can enhance our understanding of the ways living things develop.

Sensory and motor development in mice: genes, environment and their interactions

Sensory and motor developmental tests were designed to characterize spontaneous mutations in rodents. These tests are currently used to investigate developmental abnormalities associated with gene overexpression or gene targeting in mice. Here, we present an overview of our studies focused on 15 tests designed to measure sensory and motor development from birth to weaning in mice. Psychometric characteristics and factorial structure of these measures are considered first. The genetic correlates of these measures obtained with neurological mutants and gene mapping are compared. As a general rule, the contribution of genotype to the phenotypic variance of sensory and motor measures of development is low, inviting exploration of other sources of variation. Results from ovary transplantation, embryo transfer and fostering methods indicate that different components of maternal environment (cytoplasmic, uterine or postnatal) contribute to the behavioral phenotype. Although more difficult to detect, interactions between genotype and environment are involved.

Effects of the uterine environment and neocortical ectopias upon behavior of BXSB-Yaa+ mice

Between 40-60% of BXSB-Yaa+mice have neocortical ectopias, a genetically based brain anomaly. The presence of ectopias is known to affect several cognitive measures. A second way to affect cognition is by transferring embryos into foreign uteri. These variables were jointly investigated in three experiments. BXSB-Yaa+mouse embryos were transferred into same-strain uteri, or into uteri of hybrid mice. At birth, pups were cross-fostered to hybrid mothers or were reared by their birth mothers. When adult, the mice were given a series of behavioral tests with primary emphasis upon cognitive competence. Across all three studies, mice transferred into hybrid uteri were superior in the Morris maze and the Lashley III maze, and performed more effectively in shuttlebox avoidance learning. They were less effective in the simple water escape task, and the uterus groups did not differ in discrimination learning. Thus, development within a foreign uterus enhanced spatial learning and fear-based conditioning. Ectopic mice were superior to non-ectopics in learning the Morris maze, a finding consistent with prior research using the congenic BXSB-Yaa strain. There were Uterus x Ectopia interactions on a few measures, indicating that, under certain condition, whether the presence of ectopias is beneficial or detrimental is contingent upon the uterine environment within which the organism develops.

Preweanling sensorial and motor development in laboratory mice: quantitative trait loci mapping

Chromosomal mapping of genes linked with 19 measures of sensorial, motor, and body weight development were investigated. Chromosomal mapping is the first step towards gene identification. When a genomic region is shown to be linked to a trait, it is possible to select a reduced number of candidate genes that have been previously mapped on this region. The involvement of every gene can be individually tested either by molecular (transgenesis, homologous recombination) or traditional methods (congenicity). Mapping was performed using 389 males and females from two inbred strains of laboratory mice C57BL/6By and NZB/BlNJ, their reciprocal F1s and F2s. Thirty-six Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) were mapped, 12 reached the 3.13 lod score, being thus considered as confirmed. These QTL were tentatively labeled: Cliff Drop Aversion (Cliff Qtl), Geotaxia (Geot Qtl), Vertical Clinging (VertCling Qtl), Bar Holding with the 4 paws (BH4P Qtl), Age at Eyelid Opening (Aeyo Qtl), Visual Placing (Vispl Qtl), Startle Response (Start Qtl1, Start Qtl2), Body Weight at Day 10 in Males pooled with Females (Bwefmd10 Qtl), and Body Weight at Day 30 in males (Bwemd30 Qtl). For the majority of the developmental measures, the QTL that were mapped contributed little to the phenotypic variance, even when mitochondrial DNA contribution was included: Righting Response (12.7%), Cliff Drop Aversion (10%), Crossed Extensor Response (18.1%), Geotaxia (16.2%), Bar Holding Response for 10 s (12.1%), Bar Holding Response with 4 paws (8.1%), Vertical Clinging (9.3%), Vertical Climbing (5%), Startle Response (21.2%), Eyelid Opening (14.6%), Visual Placing (22%), Body Weight at Day 10 (27%), Body Weight at Day 15 in Females (52.5%), Body Weight at Day 15 in Males (17%), Body Weight at Day 30 in Females (42%), and Body Weight at Day 30 in Males (48%). A factorial analysis of the correlations between the measures of development did not provide evidence of a general factor. A general genetic factor of development was also rejected because few common genetic correlates were discovered for the 19 measures of development (Body Weight at Days 15 and 30 in Females on Chromosome 2, Eyelid Opening and Body Weight at Day 10 on Chromosome 5 and mitochondrial genome for five measures). Co-identification of genes, the function of which were previously known thanks to newly discovered QTL, should help to explain the function of QTL. Present data help to highlight candidate regions including several genes that could be candidates for the QTL function. Large confidence intervals were obtained as usual from the F2 intercrossed population. More stringent methods are suggested for more efficient co-identification.

Prenatal effects of parity on behavioral ontogeny in mice

In mice, parity and previous experience with pups may influence a mother's behavior towards her pups, thus possibly causing postnatal maternal effects on the subsequent development of the pups. The present experiment addressed the question whether parity also might have prenatal effects. We studied 622 pups from second or third litters that originated from 25 genetically different populations and had been fostered to random-bred lactating females. Development of responses was significantly delayed in mice from third litters, when compared to pups from second litters in three out of five sensorial and four out of eight motor tests. In addition, pups from second litters initially were slightly heavier than those from third litters. This difference in body weight disappeared after the 10th day postnatally. However, it should be noted that effect sizes were quite small.

Influence of the mother on development of aggressive behavior in male rats

The present experiments investigated pre- and postnatal maternal effects on aggressive behavior in rats. Resident-intruder aggressive behavior of male rats in colonies (two males and two females) was studied in five experimental groups: 1 = WWY (n = 7) the two males of each colony were wild (biological father and mother were wild) fostered by a wild mother; 2 = WAY (n = 11) the two males were wild fostered by an albino Wistar mother; 3 = AAY (n = 11) the two males were albino (biological father and mother were Wistar) fostered by an albino mother; 4 = AWY (n = 12) the two males were albino fostered by a wild mother; and 5 = HWX+HAX (n = 9) one of the males was hybrid born and reared by a wild mother (the father was albino) and the other was also hybrid but born and reared by an albino mother (the father was wild). Each test lasted 10 min and the intruder was always a Wistar male. Aggression of wild rats was higher than the laboratory ones, independently of the mother (albino or wild) they were fostered by. However, hybrid males born and reared by a wild mother were more aggressive than those that were born and reared by an albino mother, in spite of the father being wild. In conclusion, crossfostering has little effect on territorial aggression, but prenatal maternal effects seem to play a major role on the ontogeny of aggressive behavior of male rats.