Enhanced anorectic potency of naloxone in rats sham feeding 30% sucrose: reversal by repeated naloxone administration

Sucrose subjective response and eating behaviors among individuals with opioid use disorder

BACKGROUND

While opioid agonists represent the most efficacious treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD), they may enhance the reinforcing effects of sweets, placing individuals at risk for weight gain and associated consequences. We examined sucrose subjective response among adults receiving opioid agonist treatment vs. a comparison sample without OUD.

METHODS

Forty adults with (OUD+) and 40 without OUD (OUD-) completed an intake battery of eating behaviors and body mass index. During two same-day sessions, participants sampled six experimenter-administered sucrose solutions (0, 0.10, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.0 M), each three times, under double-blind conditions and rated the pleasantness and intensity of each.

RESULTS

OUD + participants presented with a higher prevalence of obesity and unhealthy eating behaviors vs. OUD- participants (p's < 0.05). They rated sucrose solutions as less pleasant than OUD- participants (p < 0.001), though this effect was limited to the three lowest concentrations (0, 0.10, 0.25M). There were no group differences on intensity ratings (p = 0.35). A change from baseline (placebo) analysis indicated a higher magnitude of change in pleasantness ratings and a lower magnitude of change in intensity ratings from 0M in OUD+ vs. OUD- (p's < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

OUD+ participants exhibited a higher magnitude of change in pleasantness ratings from placebo vs. OUD-, which was largely driven by pronounced differences in perceived pleasantness of essentially unsweet solutions. OUD+ participants presented with a consistently more severe profile in regard to eating behaviors. These data highlight the risk factors experienced by OUD+ individuals that extend beyond drug-related risks and may inform future efforts to improve health outcomes.

Endogenous opioid modulation of food intake and body weight: Implications for opioid influences upon motivation and addiction

This review is part of a special issue dedicated to Opioid addiction, and examines the influential role of opioid peptides, opioid receptors and opiate drugs in mediating food intake and body weight control in rodents. This review postulates that opioid mediation of food intake was an example of "positive addictive" properties that provide motivational drives to maintain opioid-seeking behavior and that are not subject to the "negative addictive" properties associated with tolerance, dependence and withdrawal. Data demonstrate that opiate and opioid peptide agonists stimulate food intake through homeostatic activation of sensory, metabolic and energy-related In contrast, general, and particularly mu-selective, opioid receptor antagonists typically block these homeostatically-driven ingestive behaviors. Intake of palatable and hedonic food stimuli is inhibited by general, and particularly mu-selective, opioid receptor antagonists. The selectivity of specific opioid agonists to elicit food intake was confirmed through the use of opioid receptor antagonists and molecular knockdown (antisense) techniques incapacitating specific exons of opioid receptor genes. Further extensive evidence demonstrated that homeostatic and hedonic ingestive situations correspondingly altered the levels and expression of opioid peptides and opioid receptors. Opioid mediation of food intake was controlled by a distributed brain network intimately related to both the appetitive-consummatory sites implicated in food intake as well as sites intimately involved in reward and reinforcement. This emergent system appears to sustain the "positive addictive" properties providing motivational drives to maintain opioid-seeking behavior.

Decreased consumption of sweet fluids in μ opioid receptor knockout mice: a microstructural analysis of licking behavior

RATIONALE

Evidence suggests that the palatability of food (i.e., the hedonic impact produced by its sensory features) can promote feeding and may underlie compulsive eating, leading to obesity. Pharmacological studies implicate opioid transmission in the hedonic control of feeding, though these studies often rely on agents lacking specificity for particular opioid receptors.

OBJECTIVES

Here, we investigated the role of mu opioid receptors (MORs) specifically in determining hedonic responses to palatable sweet stimuli.

METHODS

In Experiment 1, licking microstructure when consuming sucrose solution (2 to 20 %) was compared in MOR knockout and wildtype mice as a function of sucrose concentration and level of food deprivation. In Experiment 2, a similar examination was conducted using the palatable but calorie-free stimulus sucralose (0.001 to 1 %), allowing study of licking behavior independent of homeostatic variables.

RESULTS

In Experiment 1, MOR knockout mice exhibited several alterations in sucrose licking. Although wildtype mice exhibited a twofold increase in the burst length when food deprived, relative to the nondeprived test, this aspect of sucrose licking was generally insensitive to manipulations of food deprivation for MOR knockout mice. Furthermore, during concentration testing, their rate of sucrose licking was less than half that of wildtype mice. During sucralose testing (Experiment 2), MOR knockout mice licked at approximately half the wildtype rate, providing more direct evidence that MOR knockout mice were impaired in processing stimulus palatability.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that transmission through MORs mediates hedonic responses to palatable stimuli, and therefore likely contributes to normal and pathological eating.

Dietary factors affect food reward and motivation to eat

The propensity to indulge in unhealthy eating and overconsumption of palatable food is a crucial determinant in the rising prevalence of obesity in today's society. The tendency to consume palatable foods in quantities that exceed energy requirements has been linked to an addiction-like process. Although the existence of 'food addiction' has not been conclusively proven, evidence points to alterations in the brain reward circuitry induced by overconsumption of palatable foods that are similar to those seen in drug addiction. The diet-induced obesity paradigm is a common procedure to replicate features of human obesity in rodents. Here we review data on the effect of various obesogenic diets (high-fat, Ensure™, cafeteria type, sucrose) on the extent of leptin resistance, hypothalamic-neuropeptidergic adaptations and changes in feeding behavior. We also discuss to what extent such diets and properties such as macronutrient composition, physical structure, sensory stimuli, and post-ingestive effects influence the brain-reward pathways. Understanding the interaction between individual components of diets, feeding patterns, and brain reward pathways could facilitate the design of diets that limit overconsumption and prevent weight gain.

Reward systems and food intake: role of opioids

Humans eat for many reasons, including the rewarding qualities of foods. A host of neurotransmitters have been shown to influence eating behavior and some of these appear to be involved in reward-induced eating. Endogenous opioid peptides and their receptors were first reported more than 30 years ago, and studies suggesting a role of opioids in the regulation of food intake date back nearly as far. Opioid agonists and antagonists have corresponding stimulatory and inhibitory effects on feeding. In addition to studies aimed at identifying the relevant receptor subtypes and sites of action within the brain, there has been a continuing interest in the role of opioids on diet/taste preferences, food reward, and the overlap of food reward with others types of reward. Data exist that suggest a role for opioids in the control of appetite for specific macronutrients, but there is also evidence for their role in the stimulation of intake based on already-existing diet or taste preferences and in controlling intake motivated by hedonics rather than by energy needs. Finally, various types of studies indicate an overlap between mechanisms mediating drug reward and palatable food reward. Preference or consumption of sweet substances often parallels the self-administration of several drugs of abuse, and under certain conditions, the termination of intermittent access to sweet substances produces symptoms that resemble those observed during opiate withdrawal. The overconsumption of readily available and highly palatable foods likely contributes to the growing rates of obesity worldwide. An understanding of the role of opioids in mediating food reward and promoting the overconsumption of palatable foods may provide insights into new approaches for preventing obesity.

Cannabinoids and appetite: food craving and food pleasure

The ability of Cannabis sativa to promote eating has been documented for many centuries, with the drug reported by its users to promote strong cravings for, and an intensification of the sensory and hedonic properties of food. These effects are now known to result from the actions of cannabinoid molecules at specific cannabinoid receptor sites within the brain, and to reflect the physiological role of their natural ligands, the endocannabinoids, in the control of appetite. Recent developments in the biochemistry and pharmacology of endocannabinoid systems have generated convincing evidence from animal models for a normal role of endocannabinoids in the control of eating motivation. The availability of specific cannabinoid receptor agonists and antagonists raises the possibility of improved therapies for disorders of eating and body weight: not only in the suppression of appetite to counter our susceptibility to the over-consumption of highly pleasurable and energy-dense foods; but also in the treatment of conditions that involve reduced appetite and weight loss. Here, we outline some of the findings of the past decade that link endocannabinoid function appetite control, and the possible clinical applications of that knowledge.

Endocannabinoids and the non-homeostatic control of appetite

The usual physiological perspective on appetite and food intake regards control of eating simplistically, as merely the reflexive behavioural component of a strict homeostatic regulatory system. Hunger is seen to arise in response to energy deficit; meal size is determined by the passage of nutrients into the gut and the stimulation of multiple satiety signals; and overall energy intake is modified to reflect the balance of fuel reserves and energy expenditure. But everyday experience shows that we rarely eat simply through need. Rather, food stimuli exert a powerful influence over consumption through their appeal to innate and learned appetites, generating the psychological experiences of hunger, craving and delight independently of energy status. That these important and influential subjective experiences are mediated through complex neurochemical processes is self-evident; but the chemical nature of our infatuation with, and subservience to, the motivating properties of foods are overshadowed by mechanistic, peripherally anchored models that take little account of psychological factors, and which consequently struggle to explain the phenomenon of obesity. This chapter discusses recent developments that suggest the endocannabinoids are key components of the central mechanisms that give rise to the emotional and motivational experiences that lead us to eat and to overconsume.

Combined dieting and stress evoke exaggerated responses to opioids in binge-eating rats

The authors developed an animal model of binge eating where history of caloric restriction with footshock stress (R + S) causes rats to consume twice the normal amount of palatable food. The authors tested the hypothesis that binge eating is mediated by changes in opioid control of feeding by comparing rats' anorectic and orexigenic responses to naloxone and butorphanol, respectively, and by testing the ability of butorphanol to elicit binge eating of chow when palatable food was absent. Mu/kappa opioid-receptor blockade and activation had exaggerated responses in the R + S rats with naloxone suppressing binge eating to control levels, and although butorphanol did not trigger chow binge eating, it enhanced binge eating of palatable food. These responses in sated normal-weight rats strengthen evidence that reward, over metabolic need, drives binge eating.

Increased oral and decreased intestinal sensitivity to sucrose in obese, prediabetic CCK-A receptor-deficient OLETF rats

CCK-A receptor-deficient Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima fatty (OLETF) rats are hyperphagic and develop obesity and Type 2 diabetes. In this strain, taste preference functions have not been investigated. Therefore, a series of short-access, two-bottle tests were performed in age-matched prediabetic OLETF and nonmutant Long-Evans Tokushima Otsuka (LETO) rats to investigate preference for sucrose (0.03, 0.1, 0.3, or 1.0 M) presented with a choice of water. To discern orosensory from postgastric factors that may contribute to this preference, in a separate experiment, rats were allowed to sham feed sucrose in the absence or presence of duodenal sucrose infusion (0.3, 0.6, or 1.0 M). In the two-bottle real-feeding tests, OLETF rats exhibited a greater preference for 0.3 M sucrose (91.2 +/- 1.7 and 78.5 +/- 3.4% for OLETF and LETO, respectively; P < 0.01) and 1.0 M sucrose (65.3 +/- 1.2 and 57.5 +/- 2.7% for OLETF and LETO, respectively; P < 0.05) than LETO rats. OLETF rats also sham fed less of the lowest (0.03 M; 33.8 +/- 4.8 and 58.3 +/- 7.3 ml for OLETF and LETO, respectively; P < 0.05) and more of the highest (1.0 M; 109.9 +/- 6.5 and 81.0 +/- 3.9 ml for OLETF and LETO, respectively; P < 0.01) concentration of sucrose relative to LETO rats. Finally, intraduodenal sucrose infusions (0.6 and 1.0 M) produced a smaller reduction of 0.3 M sham sucrose intake [14.1 +/- 8.1 vs. 52.5 +/- 3.3 ml and 49.4 +/- 8.0 vs. 82.4 +/- 3.2 ml for 0.6 M (P < 0.01) and 1.0 M (P < 0.05) infusions in OLETF and LETO, respectively]. These findings demonstrate that OLETF rats display an increased preference for sucrose, an effect that is at least partially influenced by the orosensory stimulating effect of sucrose. This enhanced responsiveness to oral stimulation, coupled with the deficit in responding to the postingestive feedback of intestinal sucrose, may contribute additively to the development of hyperphagia and weight gain in OLETF rats.

Opioids as agents of reward-related feeding: a consideration of the evidence

Gerard Smith was one of the pioneers in the field of neuropeptidergic control of food intake. He established methodology and criteria used to determine whether a neuropeptide acts as an endogenous satiety factor. More recently, he theorized that there are direct and indirect controls of meal size. Direct controls include those that depend upon contact of food with preabsorptive receptors from the tip of the tongue to the end of the small intestine, and indirect controls include those that do not depend upon direct contact of mucosal receptors, such as learning and metabolism. In this review, we consider the evidence that opioids are mediators of reward-related feeding. We address these issues adopting Smith's approach to problem solving, including an evaluation of the opioids as controllers of the meal. We also present a novel concept of "hedonic restriction," resulting in a change in opioid gene expression. Overall, we believe the evidence supporting opioid participation in reward-driven and other types of ingestion is very strong, but much work remains before we understand how opioids contribute to the widely distributed neural network that controls ingestive behavior.

Chewing and spitting in eating disorders and its relationship to binge eating

OBJECTIVE

This study examined (i) the frequency of chewing and spitting and (ii) its association with other pathological eating behaviors in eating-disordered inpatients. We hypothesized a positive association between chewing and spitting and binge eating given the phenomenological similarities between these disordered eating behaviors.

METHOD

Frequent chewers/spitters were compared with those who did not regularly engage in this behavior with regard to diagnosis, psychometric test results, and associated eating pathology.

RESULTS

Chewing and spitting was not associated with elevated bingeing. Rather, frequent chewers/spitters exhibited higher levels of restrictive eating behaviors and the behavior was more prevalent in younger patients.

DISCUSSION

Contrary to our predictions, chewing and spitting is more closely associated with restrictive than with binge behaviors. This suggests that most individuals chew and spit small portions of food. The behavior is frequent, occurs across diagnostic groups, and may be associated with greater psychopathology. Future studies should clarify the amount of food consumed during chew/spit episodes and the presence of a sense of loss of control.

Naltrexone does not prevent acquisition or expression of flavor preferences conditioned by fructose in rats

The effects of the general opioid antagonist, naltrexone, on the acquisition and expression of flavor preferences conditioned by the sweet taste of fructose were examined. Food-restricted rats were trained over eight daily alternating one-bottle sessions (2 h) to drink an 8% fructose solution containing one novel flavor (CS+/F) and a less preferred 0.2% saccharin solution containing a different flavor (CS-/S). Four groups of rats were treated daily with either saline (control group) or naltrexone doses of 0.1, 1.0, or 5.0 mg/kg during training. Preferences were assessed in two-bottle tests with the CS+/S and CS-/S flavors presented in 0.2% saccharin solutions following saline injections. Naltrexone dose-dependently reduced fructose and saccharin intakes during training, confirming the drug's well-known suppressive effect on the intake of sweet solutions. Despite their reduced training intakes, the naltrexone groups displayed preferences for the CS+/S over the CS-/S (72-86%) that were similar to that of the control group (78%). The effect of naltrexone on the expression of the CS+/S flavor preference was evaluated by treating control rats with naltrexone (0.1-5 mg/kg) prior to CS+/S vs. CS-/S choice tests. The drug doses produced a dose-dependent reduction in CS+/S intake but did not significantly attenuate the CS+/S preference. These data are consistent with the relative inability of naltrexone to reduce flavor-flavor conditioning by sucrose in sham-feeding rats and flavor-nutrient conditioning in rats receiving intragastric sucrose infusions. In contrast, dopamine antagonists reduce both sucrose- and fructose-conditioned flavor preferences, which indicates the sensitivity of these conditioning paradigms to neuropharmacological manipulations. These data indicate that the endogenous opioid system, unlike the dopamine system, does not play a major role in either the acquisition or expression of flavor preference learning as measured in two-bottle choice tests.

Endogenous opioids and feeding behavior: a 30-year historical perspective

This invited review, based on the receipt of the Third Gayle A. Olson and Richard D. Olson Prize for the publication of the outstanding behavioral article published in the journal Peptides in 2002, examines the 30-year historical perspective of the role of the endogenous opioid system in feeding behavior. The review focuses on the advances that this field has made over the past 30 years as a result of the timely discoveries that were made concerning this important neuropeptide system, and how these discoveries were quickly applied to the analysis of feeding behavior and attendant homeostatic processes. The discoveries of the opioid receptors and opioid peptides, and the establishment of their relevance to feeding behavior were pivotal in studies performed in the 1970s. The 1980s were characterized by the establishment of opioid receptor subtype agonists and antagonists and their relevance to the modulation of feeding behavior as well as by the use of general opioid antagonists in demonstrating the wide array of ingestive situations and paradigms involving the endogenous opioid system. The more recent work from the 1990s to the present, utilizes the advantages created by the cloning of the opioid receptor genes, the development of knockout and knockdown techniques, the systematic utilization of a systems neuroscience approach, and establishment of the reciprocity of how manipulations of opioid peptides and receptors affect feeding behavior with how feeding states affect levels of opioid peptides and receptors. The role of G-protein effector systems in opioid-mediated feeding responses, which was the subject of the prize-winning article, is then reviewed.

Endocannabinoid Receptor Antagonists

Obesity has been described as a global epidemic. Its increasing prevalence is matched by growing costs, not only to the health of the individual, but also to the medical services required to treat a range of obesity-related diseases. In most instances, obesity is a product of progressively less energetic lifestyles and the over-consumption of readily available, palatable, and highly caloric foods. Past decades have seen massive investment in the search for effective anti-obesity therapies, so far with limited success. An important part of the process of developing new pharmacologic treatments for obesity lies in improving our understanding of the psychologic and physiologic processes that govern appetite and bodyweight regulation. Recent discoveries concerning the endogenous cannabinoids are beginning to give greater insight into these processes. Current research indicates that endocannabinoids may be key to the appetitive and consummatory aspects of eating motivation, possibly mediating the craving for and enjoyment of the most desired, most fattening foods. Additionally, endocannabinoids appear to modulate central and peripheral processes associated with fat and glucose metabolism. Selective cannabinoid receptor antagonists have been shown to suppress the motivation to eat, and preferentially reduce the consumption of palatable, energy-dense foods. Additionally, these agents act to reduce adiposity through metabolic mechanisms that are independent of changes in food intake. Given the current state of evidence, we conclude that the endocannabinoids represent an exciting target for new anti-obesity therapies.

Naltrexone infusion inhibits the development of preference for a high-sucrose diet

We hypothesized that the opioid antagonist naltrexone would inhibit the redevelopment of a preference for a high-sucrose diet after an abstention period from this diet. Rats that chose between a starch or sucrose diet for 10 days preferred the sucrose diet. Rats were then given access to the starch diet alone for another 10-day period. A miniosmotic pump containing saline or naltrexone was then implanted (70 microg/h; 1.7 mg/day) for approximately 10 days. During the saline infusion, 77% of the total energy came from the sucrose diet, whereas during the naltrexone infusion, 33% of the total energy came from the sucrose diet. We repeated this study in another group of rats but did not restrict the sucrose diet. In this case naltrexone failed to decrease preference for the sucrose diet. Thus naltrexone infusion inhibited redevelopment of a preference for a sucrose diet after a period of restriction to a starch diet for 10 days but had no effect on preference if both diets were present throughout the study.

Opioid peptides and the control of human ingestive behaviour

A variety of evidence suggests that endogenous opioid peptides play a role in the short-term control of eating. More recently, opioid receptor antagonists like naltrexone have been approved as a treatment for alcohol dependence. Here we review the evidence for a role of opioid peptides in both normal and abnormal eating and drinking behaviours and in particular try to identify the nature of the role of opioids in these behaviours. Particular attention is paid to the idea that opioid reward processes may be involved both in the short-term control of eating and hedonic aspects of alcohol consumption, and parallels are drawn between the effects of opiate antagonists on food pleasantness and the experience of drinking alcohol. The review also explores the extent to which data from studies using opiate antagonists and agonists provide evidence for a direct role of endogenous opioids in the control of ingestive behaviour, or alternatively whether these data may be better explained through non-specific effects such as the nausea commonly reported following administration of opiate antagonists. The review concludes that the present data suggests a single opioid mechanism is unlikely to explain all aspects of ingestive behaviour, but also concludes that opioid-mediated reward mechanisms play an important control in hedonic aspects of ingestion. The review also highlights the need for further empirical work in order to elucidate further the role of opioid peptides in human ingestive behaviour.

Pharmacology of flavor preference conditioning in sham-feeding rats: effects of naltrexone

Relatively little is known about the neurochemical and pharmacological mechanisms involved in flavor preference learning. The present study examined the ability of the opioid antagonist, naltrexone to alter the acquisition and expression of flavor preferences conditioned by the sweet taste of sucrose. This was accomplished by adding a novel flavor (the CS+) to a sucrose solution, and a different flavor (the CS-) to a less-preferred saccharin solution. Rats were trained to drink these solutions with an open gastric fistula (sham-feeding), which minimized postingestive actions. Food-restricted (Experiments 1 and 2A) and ad lib-fed (Experiment 2B) rats were given either limited (Experiment 1) or unlimited (Experiment 2) access to the CS+ and CS- solutions during one-bottle training. Preferences were assessed in two-bottle tests (with the CS+ and CS- flavors presented in mixed sucrose-saccharin solutions) following vehicle or naltrexone (0.1-10 mg/kg, SC) treatment. The rats displayed significant CS+ preferences following vehicle, particularly after unlimited access training. In four of five experiments, naltrexone significantly reduced total intakes during the two-bottle, sham-feeding tests. Except for one instance, however, the drug failed to block the preference for the CS+ flavor over the CS- flavor. The effects of naltrexone (0.1 mg/kg) on the acquisition of flavor preferences were studied in sham-feeding rats under limited (Experiment 3A) and unlimited (Experiment 3B) training access conditions. Rats treated with naltrexone during training displayed similar CS+ preferences as did saline-treated rats, even though they consumed less CS+ during training. The naltrexone-trained rats also displayed smaller reductions in total or CS+ intakes than did saline-trained rats when all rats were treated with a 2.5 mg/kg dose of naltrexone during testing. As in previous studies, these results show that naltrexone significantly reduces the intake of sweet solutions, yet it has little or no effect on the acquisition or expression of flavor preferences conditioned by sucrose in sham-feeding rats.

Diet-induced enhancement of naloxone sensitivity is independent of changes in body weight

Intake of palatable solutions can enhance the anorectic potency of opioid antagonists. This experiment examined the relative contributions of orosensory experience and body weight gain to the enhanced anorectic potency of naloxone (0.125, 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 mg/kg i.p.). Four groups of male hooded Lister rats (Charles River) were maintained on separate feeding regimes for 3 months. S-ADLIB rats were nondeprived with free access to lab chow and 20% (w/v) sucrose solution. S-RESTRICT rats received limited sucrose (50 ml/day) and chow (15 g/day) access, yoking their body weights to ADLIB rats receiving free access to lab chow only. RESTRICT rats received approx. 15 g of chow/day to maintain their body weights at 90% of the ADLIB rats. Fifteen-minute sucrose intake tests revealed marked differences between naloxone sensitivity of chronic sucrose drinkers and sucrose-naive groups. Intakes of S-ADLIB and S-RESTRICT were suppressed at all doses (max suppression >60%). In comparison to animals given sucrose, ADLIB and RESTRICT animals were significantly less sensitive (maximum suppression = 35%). Naloxone potency was independent of body weight differences. The data demonstrate that overconsumption of palatable ingesta, and not diet-induced weight gain, is sufficient to enhance antagonist potency. The study confirms that orosensory stimulation can induce plasticity in opioid systems, supporting an important role for opioids in intake regulation and general reward processes.

Opioid-receptor subtype agonist-induced enhancements of sucrose intake are dependent upon sucrose concentration

Selective mu ([D-Ala2, N-Me-Phe4, Gly-ol5]-enkephalin (DAMGO)), delta1 ([D-Pen2, D-Pen5]-enkephalin (DPDPE)), delta2 ([D-Ala2, Glu4]-Deltorphin (Delt II)), kappa1 (U50488H) and kappa3 (naloxone benzoylhydrazone (NalBzOH)) opioid agonists each stimulate food intake in rats. Whereas studies with selective opioid antagonists implicate mu and kappa1 receptors in the mediation of sucrose intake, studies with selective opioid agonists implicate mu and delta receptors in the mediation of saccharin intake. The present study determined if specific delta1, delta2, kappa1, kappa3 and mu opioid-receptor subtype agonists produced similar alterations in sucrose intake as a function of sucrose concentration (0.5%, 2.5%, 10%) across a 1-h time-course. Each of these agonists significantly increased sucrose intake with variations in pattern, magnitude, and consistency as a function of sucrose concentration. Whereas the mu opioid agonist, DAMGO, and the delta1 opioid agonist, DPDPE, each enhanced sucrose intake at higher (2.5%, 10%), but not lower (0.5%), concentrations, the delta2 opioid agonist, Delt II, increased sucrose intake at lower (0.5%, 2.5%), but not higher (10%), concentrations. Kappa opioid agonists produced less consistent effects. The kappa1 opioid agonist, U50488H, increased sucrose intake at high (10%) concentrations and decreased sucrose intake at low (0.5%) concentrations, and the kappa3 opioid agonist, NalBzOH, inconsistently increased sucrose intake at the 0.5% (20 microg) and 10% (1 microg) concentrations. Thus, these data further implicate mu, delta1, and delta2 opioid mediation of palatable intake, particularly of its orosensory characteristics.

Prior exposure to palatable solutions enhances the effects of naltrexone on food intake in rats

Previous research has suggested that chronic intake of palatable foods and fluids enhances the activity of the endogenous opioid system. To examine this suggestion, the effect of naltrexone on food intake was examined in male Long-Evans rats with or without prior exposure to palatable solutions. In Experiment 1, rats were fed laboratory chow alone or laboratory chow and a 32% sucrose solution, and in Experiment 2, were fed chow alone, chow and a 32% Polycose solution, or chow and a 0.15% saccharin solution for three weeks. The sucrose, Polycose, and saccharin solutions were removed 18 h prior to drug administration. Rats then received injections of naltrexone hydrochloride (0.0, 0.3 or 3.0 mg/kg. sc) and chow intakes were measured during the subsequent 1, 2, 4, 6 and 24 h. Naltrexone injections had minimal effects on intakes of animals which previously had consumed only chow. In contrast, naltrexone led to significant dose-related decreases in chow intakes in rats which had previously consumed the sucrose, Polycose, or saccharin solutions. These results provide confirmation for the suggestion that chronic intake of palatable solutions alters the activity of the endogenous opioid system.

Selective actions of central mu and kappa opioid antagonists upon sucrose intake in sham-fed rats

Intake of a palatable sucrose solution in real-fed rats is mediated in part by central mu and kappa opioid receptors. Since general opioid antagonists still inhibit sucrose intake in sham-fed rats, the present study examined whether centrally administered mu (beta-funaltrexamine: 5, 20 micrograms), mu1 (naloxonazine: 50 micrograms), kappa (nor-binaltorphamine: 1, 5, 20 micrograms), delta (naltrindole: 20 micrograms) or delta 1 (DALCE: 40 micrograms) opioid subtype antagonists altered sucrose intake in sham-fed rats in a similar manner to systemic naltrexone (0.01-1 mg/kg) and whether such effects were equivalent to altering the sucrose concentration. Sucrose (20%) intake in sham-fed rats was significantly and dose-dependently reduced by naltrexone (59%), beta-funaltrexamine (44%) and nor-binaltorphamine (62%), but not by naloxonazine, naltrindole or DALCE. The reductions in sham sucrose (20%) intake by general, mu and kappa antagonism were similar in pattern and magnitude to diluting sucrose concentration from 20% to 10% in untreated sham-fed rats. Since both real-fed and sham-fed rats share similar patterns of specificity of opioid effects, magnitudes and potencies of inhibition, it suggests that central mu and kappa antagonism acts on orosensory mechanisms supporting sucrose intake.

Microinjection of opioid antagonists into the substantia nigra reduces stress-induced eating in rats

Stress produced by pinching the tail has been shown to cause satiated animals to eat and to display oral stereotypies. Endogenous opioids and central dopamine systems have been implicated in the mediation of these effects. In order to test the possibility that the substantia nigra (SN) might be involved, the amount of food intake and gnawing produced by mild tail pinch were assessed following bilateral microinjections of opioid antagonists into the SN. Evaluations of nociceptive thresholds were also conducted using tail flick and hot plate tests. Eating induced by tail pinch was reduced by microinjections of the non-selective opioid antagonist naloxone (3, 10, 20 and 30 nmol) and by the mu-selective antagonist Cys2, Tyr3, Orn5, Pen7 Amide (CTOP) (1, 3 and 10 nmol). These effects on eating occurred in the absence of effects on gnawing. kappa- and delta-antagonists (10 nmol) had no effect on eating or gnawing. Naloxone did not alter either tail flick or hot-plate response latencies. The highest dose of CTOP increased response latency on the hot-plate test only. The results are interpreted as suggesting that the SN may be an important central site of action for opioid antagonists in reducing stress-induced eating. The possibility that the SN may be a central site mediating the effects of dopamine on this phenomenon is also discussed.

Low doses of morphine reduce voluntary alcohol consumption in rhesus monkeys

Experimental opioid modulation has been found to influence the consumption of alcohol in animals. Whereas it has generally been agreed upon that opiate antagonists reduce alcohol consumption, the results with opiate agonists are less consistent. The present study reports on the effect of low doses of morphine in 8 adult male rhesus monkeys that had a free choice in drinking water, a 16% and a 32% ethanol/water solution, (a) during continuous ad libitum access (Experiment I), and (b) after 2 days of alcohol abstinence (Experiment II). In both experiments each monkey received a single morphine injection (i.m.) in 5 different doses (0.03, 0.06, 0.17, 0.50, 1.50 mg.kg-1); each morphine injection (i.m.) was placebo-controlled in a cross-over design. Consumption was measured from 16.00 h in the afternoon (30 min after injection) to 08.30 h the next morning. In Experiment I after 0.50 and 1.50 mg.kg-1 of morphine ethanol intake and water consumption were both reduced during the first hours after injection; only ethanol intake remained reduced during the subsequent night. Effects lasted not longer than 24 h. In Experiment II, morphine administered 30 min before reintroduction of ethanol solutions reduced ethanol intake at doses of 0.17, 0.50 and 1.50 mg.kg-1; water consumption was unaffected. The reduction lasted for the subsequent night after the 2 highest doses. Records obtained of various spontaneous behavioural activities made it unlikely that the used dose range had induced some aspecific sedation; monkeys remained alert and active. The results are contradictory with studies in which low doses of morphine stimulated alcohol drinking in rats. The present results seem to support the hypothesis that at least in monkeys morphine can compensate for some effects of alcohol.