Laparoscopic bilateral nephrectomy for renin-mediated hypertension

Simultaneous bilateral native nephrectomy by retroperitoneal approach

The indication for simultaneous bilateral native nephrectomy and the choice of surgical technique is of key importance, as these patients are burdened with a large comorbidity. The paper reports our experience of seven successful and completed simultaneous bilateral native nephrectomy procedures with retroperitoneal approach in the patient's flank position. Seven patients (mean age 34), were indicated for the removal of both kidneys before the planned transplant. Six patients underwent haemodialysis from 48 to 84 months, and one underwent peritoneal dialysis for 60 months. Two patients had undergone graftectomy. The indications were chronic infection or hypertension. The length of the kidneys ranged from 5.8 to 10cm. All procedures were performed by the laparoscopic technique with retroperitoneal approach, with the patient in the flank position. Three trocars were used on each side. The retroperitoneal space created did not require balloon dilatation. The kidneys were removed through the 10mm trocar hole after splitting. The duration of the procedure ranged from 150 to 240 minutes, average 139 minutes and blood loss ranged from100 to 250mL, average 142mL. There were no complications. In 6 patients, the postoperative dialysis was performed at zero-day. One patient continued peritoneal dialysis. Patients were discharged on the 2nd day, except one with peritoneal dialysis, who was discharged on the 3rd day. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic bilateral native nephrectomy is a safe and effective technique, and it can be considered as an ideal approach for native nephrectomy. It allows for the preservation of peritoneal integrity and vessels for future vascular access.

Superior Hypertension Management in Pediatric Kidney Transplant Patients After Native Nephrectomy

BACKGROUND

Native nephrectomy in pediatric kidney transplant recipients is performed for multiple indications. Posttransplant hypertension requiring medical management is common, and the effect of native nephrectomy on posttransplant hypertension is poorly studied. Our aim is to evaluate the impact of native nephrectomy on posttransplant hypertension.

METHODS

One hundred thirty-six consecutive pediatric kidney transplant recipients from 2007 to 2012 were studied at a single institution and divided into 2 groups: no nephrectomy and native nephrectomy (unilateral and bilateral nephrectomy). Antihypertensive medication use was evaluated before nephrectomy/transplant, at discharge from transplant and at 1, 3, and 5 years posttransplant.

RESULTS

In a bivariate analysis, nephrectomy was associated with a significant reduction in the percentage of patients requiring antihypertensive medication at the time of discharge (27.3%) and 1 year posttransplant (10.7%) as compared with patients without nephrectomy (71.7%, and 50%, respectively, P < 0.05). This trend toward reduction in antihypertensive medication in the nephrectomy group as compared with the no nephrectomy group persisted at 3 (18.6% versus 43.2%) and 5 years (19.7% versus 37.5%) posttransplant. Multivariable logistic regression demonstrated that patients without native nephrectomy had higher odds of requiring antihypertensive medication at the time of discharge (3.3) and 1 year (5.2) as compared with patients who underwent native nephrectomy (P = 0.036 and P = 0.013, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Native nephrectomy reduces the odds of needing antihypertensive medication after transplant. The impact of native nephrectomy is crucial to the comprehensive management of pediatric transplant recipients where medication compliance is challenging and lifelong hypertension is known to negatively impact cardiovascular health.

Paradoxical increase in blood pressure following bilateral native nephrectomy

Hypertension with Chronic kidney disease is often difficult to control medically. In such patients, nephrectomy can help to control blood pressure (BP). We describe a case of a 6-year-old boy with autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease who showed a paradoxical increase in BP following bilateral nephrectomy.

Renal transplantation and polycystic: surgical considerations

BACKGROUND

The indication and timing of nephrectomy in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) remain controversial, especially in patients who are candidates to renal transplantation (RT). The main surgical options such as unilateral vs. bilateral nephrectomy, nephrectomy before vs. after RT, or simultaneous nephrectomy and transplantation, are herein discussed.

OBJECTIVE

Evidence acquisition of the best surgical management available for ADPKD in the context of kidney transplantation.

ACQUISITION OF EVIDENCE

Systematic literature review in PubMed from 1978 to 2013 was conducted. Articles selected included:randomized controlled trials and cohort studies. Furthermore, well designed ADPKD reviews were considered for this study.

SYNTHESIS OF EVIDENCE

Laparoscopic nephrectomy in ADPKD is a safe procedure with an acceptable complication rate. Unilateral nephrectomy has advantages over the bilateral one regarding the perioperative complication rate. Although the timing of nephrectomy is controversial, it seems that simultaneous nephrectomy and renal transplantation does not increase surgical morbidity neither affect graft survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Simultaneous nephrectomy and RT appears to be an acceptable alternative to conventional two-stage procedure without any increased morbidity, in the context of ADPKD. Furthermore, laparoscopic nephrectomy performed in experienced centres is a safe alternative to conventional approach.

Comparison of unilateral renal artery embolization versus bilateral for treatment of severe refractory hypertension in hemodialysis patients

OBJECTIVE

Hypertension in ESRD patients is common, and often refractory to common medical interventions. Bilateral renal embolization (BRE) is an alternative to nephrectomy in treating severe refractory hypertension in hemodialysis patients, but has drawbacks in residual renal function preservation and post-infarction syndrome. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of unilateral renal embolization (URE) for the treatment of severe refractory hypertension in hemodialysis patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 2000 to May 2007, 16 hemodialysis patients with severe refractory hypertension were randomized to URE or BRE group, and received percutaneous transcatheter unilateral or bilateral renal embolization, respectively. The efficacy and complications of these two procedures were compared. The plasma renin activity (PRA), plasma angiotensin II, aldosterone and endothelin-1 (ET-1) were measured pre- and post-renal embolization in both groups.

RESULTS

The procedures were completed successfully without severe immediate complications. The blood pressure decreased from 211/122 to 127/81 mmHg in URE group (P < 0.0001), and in BRE group from 208/117 to 124/76 mmHg (P < 0.0001) with significantly reduced need for antihypertensive medications. The residual renal function was reasonably kept and post-infarction syndrome was milder in URE group compared with BRE group. No activation of RAS was observed in this series and no RAS activity dynamic change occurred post-procedure. Decreased circulating ET-1 was accompanied with the lowering of blood pressure after the procedure (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Unilateral renal embolization is as effective as BRE in treating severe refractory hypertension in hemodialysis patients, with advantages over BRE in residual renal function preservation and milder post-infarction syndrome.

Bilateral laparoscopic nephrectomy with simultaneous peritoneal dialysis catheter implantation

Bilateral nephrectomy prior to transplantation is indicated in some patients with end-stage renal disease. The indications for bilateral nephrectomy include persistent heavy proteinuria, refractory hypertension, and urinary tract infections. We report an eight-month-old baby with male pseudohermaphroditism and renal failure secondary to diffuse mesangial sclerosis. While awaiting renal transplantation, dialysis became necessary and the child presented standard drug therapy-resistant hypertension. A bilateral nephrectomy was performed simultaneously to peritoneal dialysis catheter implantation by using laparoscopy. At the present time, the patient is doing well with ambulatory dialysis and all antihypertensive medication has been discontinued. We recommend this technique in children who require bilateral nephrectomy and peritoneal dialyisis. Not only is it somewhat less aggressive than traditional open surgery, but it also reduces post-operative pain, allows earlier initiation of peritoneal dialysis, and improves cosmetic appearance.

Bilateral Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy for Renal Tumors in Patients with Acquired Cystic Kidney Disease

PURPOSE

We describe our experience with simultaneous bilateral laparoscopic radical nephrectomy performed in patients with acquired cystic kidney disease (ACKD) and renal tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between June 2000 and September 2002, 10 patients with ACKD underwent simultaneous bilateral laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal lesions suspicious for carcinoma. The lesions were discovered during pretransplant evaluation in 9 patients and incidentally in 1 renal transplant recipient. A 3- or 4-port transperitoneal approach was used for each side to mobilize the kidney and secure the renal hilum. Both specimens were extracted through a midline supraumbilical incision. Operative time, blood loss, analgesic requirements, hospital stay, and convalescence and recurrence rates were determined.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 41.6 years (range, 29-47 years). Mean operative time was 6.5 hours (range, 4.5-9.7 hours) and mean estimated blood loss was 164 cc (range, 50-300 cc). There was one intraoperative complication-a clotted arteriovenous (AV) graft; and 2 postoperative complications-1 fluid overload and 1 adrenal insufficiency. The average length of hospital stay was 3.1 days (range, 2-4 days) and mean convalescence was 2.8 weeks (range, 1-6 weeks). All cancers were confined to the kidneys and there has been no recurrence during follow-up ranging from 6 to 26 months.

CONCLUSION

Bilateral laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in end-stage renal disease patients is safe and feasible. The advantages of the laparoscopic approach include minimal intraoperative blood loss, shorter hospital stay, minimal postoperative pain, and a rapid return to normal activity. The laparoscopic technique offers an effective, minimally invasive therapeutic alternative to open surgery in high-risk end-stage renal disease patients.

Renovascular Hypertension: Current Concepts

Hypertension produced by renal artery occlusive disease is an important secondary form of hypertension. Clinicians commonly encounter forms of renal arterial disease of varying severity, many of which are of little hemodynamic significance when first detected. Experimental studies emphasize that transient activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system is necessary for initiation of renovascular hypertension. At some point, angiotensin II activates additional mechanisms responsible for sustained increased blood pressure including sodium retention, endothelial dysfunction, and vasoconstriction related to production of reactive oxygen species. Widespread application of agents that block the renin-angiotensin system, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin-receptor blockers, render many patients with unilateral renal arterial disease manageable primarily by medical means for many years. In the setting of high a priori likelihood of renovascular disease, recognizing the potential for disease progression during medical therapy and individually evaluating the risks and benefits of renal revascularization are important tasks. Recent prospective studies show limited, but real, benefit regarding blood pressure control for patients with atherosclerotic disease. Whether earlier renal revascularization offers benefits regarding improved morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular end point reduction is an important question to be addressed in multicenter, prospective, randomized trials. Our paradigm stresses the fact that patients with renovascular hypertension require intensive blood pressure control and cardiovascular risk factor intervention, both before and after revascularization. Hence, management of such patients requires close attention and periodic review regarding restenosis and progression of vascular disease.

Anaesthesia for laparoscopic urological surgery

Laparoscopy for urological surgery is a relatively recent surgical innovation. Some centres have substantial experience of single operations, but very few have experience with a comprehensive range. Our programme began with nephrectomy and pyeloplasty, and has expanded to provide for a living related kidney donor programme and for other procedures usually conducted open. Recently, it has included prostate and bladder cancer surgery. The learning curve and implications for anaesthesia are described on the basis of the experience of one anaesthetist with 124 patients. Perioperative care issues, in common with other abdominal laparoscopic procedures, relate to operating positions, the consequences of carbon dioxide under pressure in the abdomen and postoperative analgesia. There is only a small requirement for regional anaesthesia supplementation and invasive analgesia. The corporate laparoscopic cholecystectomy experience was used as the foundation for anaesthesia and to delineate specific organ system issues and any interventions. Significant differences were found in the spectrum of the urological patient population and comorbidity, notably renal function or dysfunction, and complications.

Laparoscopic simultaneous bilateral pretransplant nephrectomy for uncontrolled hypertension

Severe hypertension resistant to multiple antihypertensive drugs represents an indication for bilateral pretransplant renal ablation by surgery or angioembolization. Besides causing severe pain and renal postinfarction syndrome, angioembolization may be ineffective. We present our experience with simultaneous bilateral laparoscopic pretransplant nephrectomies in patients with end-stage renal disease and severe uncontrollable hypertension. Among the three patients considered for bilateral pretransplant laparoscopic nephrectomy between September 2002 and August 2003, the procedure was successfully performed in two patients. Left nephrectomy was performed transperitoneally and right nephrectomy retroperitoneoscopically. In one of the three patients, a prior attempt at angioembolization had produced a dense perirenal reaction, rendering laparoscopic surgery impossible. Total operating time for bilateral laparoscopic nephrectomies was 260 and 280 minutes. Within 1 month following the nephrectomies, all patients became normotensive with minimal or no antihypertensive medications. We conclude that simultaneous bilateral laparoscopic nephrectomy is feasible and less morbid in end-stage renal disease patients. Prior angioembolisation can make laparoscopic surgery difficult or impossible.

Impact of kidney transplantation on the progression of cardiovascular disease

Kidney transplantation, of all the treatment modalities for end-stage renal disease, affords the greatest potential for prolonged survival and improved quality of life. Great strides in immunosuppressant therapy have improved graft survival and forced clinicians to consider other health-care needs of kidney transplant recipients. Chief among these needs is the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease. Cardiovascular disease is the most common cause of death among patients with a working renal allograft. Because therapies for primary and secondary prevention are successful in the general population, transplant clinicians are increasingly focused on preventing or limiting the progression of cardiovascular disease. Initiation of aggressive management of conventional atherosclerotic risk factors and uremia-related risk factors, ideally during the early stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD) or after kidney transplantation, and efforts to delay the progression of kidney disease will hopefully reduce the cardiovascular burden in transplant recipients.

Hypertension after kidney transplantation: impact, pathogenesis and therapy

Hypertension (HTN) contributes to the high incidence of cardiovascular disease mortality as well as chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) and late graft failure in renal transplant recipients. The mechanisms are complex and may involve pathogenic factors attributable to the host, allograft, and immunosuppressive drugs. Calcium channel blockers should be used to ameliorate the nephrotoxicity of calcineurin inhibitors in the early years after transplantation. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin-2 type-1 receptor blockers are safe and effective, have antiproteinuric effects, slow the progression of CAN, and may provide survival benefits. Diuretics and/or beta-adrenergic receptor blockers are frequently added in combination regimen. Appropriate adjustment of the immunosuppressive drugs should also be considered for the long-term care of kidney recipients with HTN.

Posterior approach for retroperitoneal laparoscopic bilateral nephrectomy in a child

We report on a unique posterior approach for bilateral nephrectomy by retroperitoneoscopy that was conducted in a 13-year-old boy with end-stage renal disease managed by peritoneal dialysis. A posterior approach for bilateral nephrectomy by retroperitoneal laparoscopy provided adequate visualization and created enough working space for the manipulation. The procedure was performed during a short period, and the patient did not need to be repositioned. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic bilateral nephrectomy is a useful option in school-aged children with poorly functioning kidneys, particularly those children also undergoing peritoneal dialysis.

Bilateral hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease using a single midline HandPort incision

OBJECTIVES

To present one of the first known series of bilateral, transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease using a hand-assisted technique by way of a single, midline HandPort incision. Synchronous, bilateral nephrectomy for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease is an infrequently performed procedure, with only a few reports using laparoscopy.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 4 patients undergoing bilateral hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy for symptomatic autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease between June 2000 and January 2001. Follow-up consisted of chart review and telephone survey.

RESULTS

All 4 patients underwent successful bilateral hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy, with a mean operative time of 286 minutes. This included 1 patient who underwent simultaneous laparoscopic marsupialization of symptomatic hepatic cysts. The average size of the polycystic kidneys removed was 1582 g. Complications included acute tubular necrosis of a renal allograft in 1 patient that resolved spontaneously and retained retroperitoneal cystic fluid that required percutaneous drainage in another patient. All patients did well postoperatively, with complete resolution of their presenting symptoms. Those with renal allografts had stable function at the last follow-up visit.

CONCLUSIONS

Bilateral hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy using a single HandPort incision is a feasible alternative for the removal of symptomatic polycystic kidneys. It offers the advantage of easier identification and control of hilar structures that are often obscured by the distorted renal anatomy. In addition, it allows the simultaneous performance of other intra-abdominal procedures.

Laparoscopic surgery in renal transplant recipients

An exponential increase has occurred in the use of laparoscopic surgery in patients who have undergone prior renal transplantation. The main indications are the treatment of symptomatic pelvic lymphoceles and native kidney nephrectomy for various reasons. Most reports have shown laparoscopy to be equally effective and less morbid than conventional open surgery. In addition to conferring the benefits of a minimally invasive approach, laparoscopy potentially offers three advantages specific to this immunosuppressed population of patients. First, it avoids the potential wound-related problems inherent in open surgery. Second, by reducing hospitalization, it reduces the risk for nosocomial infections. Third, by allowing an earlier resumption of oral intake, it enables the continuation of oral immunosuppression. Proper perioperative management of fluid and electrolyte balance is critical in this group of patients. Despite concerns, there is no evidence showing that laparoscopy adversely affects allograft function.

The heterogeneous and delayed course of blood pressure normalization in hypertensive patients after bilateral nephrectomy with and without subsequent renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

Controversy exists about the time course of blood pressure normalization following bilateral nephrectomy. We sought to evaluate the time course of blood pressure normalization following bilateral nephrectomy and after subsequent kidney transplantation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Clinical data from 14 hypertensive patients were retrospectively assessed. Baseline blood pressure was 175 +/- 33/109 +/- 9 mmHg. Ten patients firstly underwent unilateral nephrectomy, which resulted in a slight increase of blood pressure (185 +/- 22/110 +/- 5 mmHg). One month following bilateral nephrectomy, blood pressure was 167 +/- 23/104 +/- 17 mmHg, at 3 months 159 +/- 42/104 +/- 25 mmHg, and at 6 months 149 +/- 41/96 +/- 30 mmHg. Antihypertensive medication was necessary in 9/14 patients at a 2 year follow-up. Eight patients remained anephric (group I), 6 patients had subsequent kidney transplantation (group II). In group I, blood pressure was 159 +/- 42/93 +/- 17 mmHg and 129 +/- 34/75 +/- 14 mmHg at 3 and 6 months, respectively (p< 0.05 vs. baseline). In group II, blood pressure decreased from 188 +/- 42/ 128 +/- 46 mmHg to 167 +/- 48/113 +/- 32 mmHg at 3 months, but increased after transplantation to 186 +/- 39/118 +/- 33 mmHg. Antihypertensive medication was still necessary in 5 transplanted patients (83%) and in 3 anephric patients (38%).

CONCLUSION

Adaptation of the blood pressure response following bilateral nephrectomy is a time requiring process, and long-term antihypertensive medication may still be necessary.

Simultaneous bilateral simple nephrectomy

Bilateral simultaneous nephrectomy is a rare procedure usually performed for end-stage renal disease, most often because of persistent hypertension after renal transplantation. Four trocars generally are inserted, with a lower abdominal and a subcostal port being used by the surgeon. An intra-abdominal pressure of 8 to 10 mm Hg is used during the procedure. The first kidney is left in situ while the other one is being dissected. Unless there is infection or malignancy, a retrieval sac is not used. In our series of 13 cases, the operating times ranged from 240 to 390 minutes (mean 320 minutes), and the mean 125 mL. Surgical discharges criteria usually were met on postoperative day 1 or 2. Laparoscopic bilateral nephrectomy in a single session is feasible in nearly all properly selected cases, even in patients with previous abdominal surgery or peritoneal dialysis. The operation takes longer than open surgery and may have a higher complication rate, but recovery is faster.

Laparoscopic retroperitoneal nephrectomy in high risk children

PURPOSE

Nephrectomy may be indicated in children with end stage renal disease before transplantation. We studied the feasibility and results of nephrectomy performed via a retroperitoneal laparoscopic approach in these high risk children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed 12 nephrectomies in 9 children with end stage renal disease and a mean age of 7 years (range 7 months to 13 years) through a 3 trocar retroperitoneal laparoscopic approach. Cases were classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists grade III and presented with end stage renal disease, hypertension, thrombocytopenia and/or the nephrotic syndrome. The renal artery and vein were ligated separately with endocorporeal knots and clips. Mean size of the kidney was 8 cm. (range 5 to 12). Bilateral nephrectomy was performed simultaneously in 2 patients 7 and 12 months old, respectively. Cardiorespiratory changes related to retroperitoneal gas insufflation were assessed prospectively. To compare laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy we retrospectively analyzed the data of 12 open nephrectomies performed in 9 children with similar nephrological indications.

RESULTS

The procedure was feasible in all cases without conversion to open surgery, and no intraoperative incident occurred. Mean operative time of laparoscopic nephrectomy was 2 hours (range 1 hour 20 minutes to 3 hours 10 minutes). After retroperitoneal carbon dioxide insufflation systolic arterial pressure and end-tidal carbon dioxide were significantly increased without the need for specific measure to correct these modifications. Hemodialysis began 1 day postoperatively and feeding began 2 days postoperatively. Mean hospital stay was 5.2 days (range 3 to 7). The comparative study of the open nephrectomy group showed no significant difference in mean operating time (p = 0.07), and hospital stay was significantly shorter for the laparoscopic group (p <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy is safe and feasible for high risk children. The relatively long operating time is necessary for hemostasis in these children at risk for hemorrhagic complications.

Treatment of posttransplant hypertension by laparoscopic bilateral nephrectomy?

BACKGROUND

Hypertension is an important risk factor for the development of chronic graft failure and decreased graft and patient survival after renal transplantation.

METHODS

Between September 1994 and August 1996, 14 patients underwent laparoscopic bilateral nephrectomy for treatment of drug-resistant hypertension after successful renal transplantation. Common causes of hypertension were largely excluded before bilateral nephrectomy. A scoring system was developed for comparison of different antihypertensive regimes. In this system, points were given according to type and dosage of each antihypertensive drug.

RESULTS

At 6-month follow-up, all patients showed well-controlled blood pressure (median of mean arterial pressure: 104 vs. 130 mmHg preoperatively, P<0.001, n=14), and significantly fewer antihypertensive drugs were needed according to the scoring system (48.9+/-20.9 points vs. 105.9+/-23.5 points preoperatively, P<0.001, n=14). During laparoscopy, three conversions to open surgery were necessary. Postoperatively, four complications occurred. After laparoscopy, immunosuppression and other oral medication were given continuously. The hospital stay ranged between 3 and 6 days (median: 5 days).

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that bilateral nephrectomy using the laparoscopic technique can be an effective alternative method for a selected group of patients with severe hypertension, which is unresponsive to conservative management after successful renal transplantation with regard to improving the long-term graft survival.

Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy of native kidneys in renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy in transplant recipients and in other patients scheduled for nephrectomy.

METHODS

From February 1994 to July 1996, 15 transplant recipients and 17 other patients underwent a total of 36 retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomies for various indications. Operative time, morbidity, and hospital stay were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The average operating time for the 36 procedures was 95+/-38 min (range, 35-180 min). It was shorter in transplant recipients (81+/-32 min) than in other patients (100+/-39 min, P<0.05). There was one postoperative complication in the transplant recipient group. The average length of the postoperative hospitalization was 3.7+/-1.4 days (range, 2-8 days).

CONCLUSIONS

The retroperitoneal laparoscopic approach for nephrectomy is as safe and effective in renal transplant recipients as in other patients. Postoperative stay and delay to resumption of oral immunotherapy are short. This approach has become our first-line approach for native nephrectomy in transplant recipients.

Percutaneous transcatheter renal ablation with absolute ethanol for uncontrolled hypertension or nephrotic syndrome: results in 11 patients with end-stage renal disease

PURPOSE

Retrospective review of authors' experience with percutaneous transcatheter renal ablation in patients with uncontrolled hypertension and/or nephrotic syndrome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between April 1987 and September 1995, renal ablation was performed on 11 patients aged 10 months to 21 years. All patients had end-stage renal disease (ESRD) with uncontrolled hypertension (10 patients) and/or nephrotic syndrome (four patients). Uncontrolled hypertension was defined as diastolic pressure greater than 90 mm Hg despite multidrug antihypertensive therapy. Nephrotic syndrome was defined as proteinuria exceeding 960 mg/m2 per day, serum albumin level less than 3 g/dL, and generalized edema. Embolization was performed with absolute ethanol from a common femoral artery approach. In most cases, a balloon catheter was used to prevent alcohol reflux into the aorta or nontarget renal artery branches, such as the adrenal arteries. Angiographic stasis of contrast material in the renal arteries was the endpoint.

RESULTS

All patients experienced a postembolization syndrome of 3-5 days duration, clinically manifested by variable degrees of nausea, vomiting, fever, and pain. Long-term improvement in hypertension was observed in nine patients. Improvement in hypertension was defined as diastolic blood pressure below 90 mm Hg while the patient received the same or fewer antihypertensive medications. The four patients with nephrotic syndrome were cured of their proteinuria and edema.

CONCLUSIONS

Transarterial renal ablation with alcohol is efficacious for treatment of uncontrolled hypertension and nephrotic syndrome in patients with ESRD. The morbidity and mortality in our series were less than those reported for surgical nephrectomy.

Laparoscopy in renal transplant patients

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the use of laparoscopic techniques in patients with a renal transplant.

METHODS

Since 1992, 358 patients have undergone urologic laparoscopy at our hospital. Among these, 37 procedures (10.4%) were performed in patients with a renal transplant: 14 bilateral nephrectomies for severe drug-resistant hypertension, 9 marsupializations of symptomatic lymphoceles, 6 renal allograft biopsies in patients with clotting abnormalities, 6 unilateral nephrectomies, and 2 nephroureterectomies for recurrent episodes of pyelonephritis and symptomatic vesicoureteral reflux, respectively.

RESULTS

Five complications (14%) and three conversions (8%) occurred. Patients who underwent successful laparoscopic operations began mobilization and oral intake on the day after the operation. The hospital stay ranged from 1 to 6 days. In the nephrectomy groups, perioperative urine outputs remained stable and post-operative urine outputs were increased as compared with those in the perioperative period (P < 0.05). Post-operatively, serum creatinine remained stable or improved in patients who underwent nephrectomy or marsupialization of lymphocele.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that laparoscopic techniques are safe and effective in the treatment of patients with a renal transplant. Renal allograft function apparently is not affected by laparoscopic procedures.

Laparoscopic bilateral nephrectomy: results in 11 renal transplant patients

PURPOSE

We report our experience with bilateral laparoscopic nephrectomy after renal transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between August 1994 and October 1995, 11 patients who had previously undergone renal transplantation underwent bilateral laparoscopic nephrectomy at our hospital due to poorly controlled hypertension. The records of 10 patients undergoing bilateral open nephrectomy were reviewed for comparison.

RESULTS

Mean operative time in the laparoscopy group was 195 minutes (range 125 to 270). Mean blood loss was 345 ml. and 1 patient required conversion to an open operation. Oral intake and mobilization were begun 1 day postoperatively. Mean postoperative morphine equivalent consumption was 14 mg., mean hospital stay was 4.2 days (range 3 to 6) and mean return to normal activities was 14 days. At a mean followup of 10.4 months blood pressure had improved significantly in 8 patients (73%). Mean operative time in the open surgery group was 145 minutes (range 115 to 170) and mean postoperative morphine equivalent required was 44 mg. Compared to the laparoscopy group the interval to resumption of oral intake (3.5 days), duration of hospital stay (10.7 days) and return to normal activities (36 days) were prolonged in the open surgery group.

CONCLUSIONS

According to our results, bilateral laparoscopic nephrectomy could be an effective alternative for the treatment of severe hypertension after renal transplantation. Compared to open nephrectomy most patients benefit from the laparoscopic approach.