Intra-accumbens delta 1-opioid agonist, pC1-DPDPE, differentially affects patterns of locomotor activity

Accumbal core: essential link in feed-forward spiraling striato-nigro-striatal in series connected loop

The goal of the present study was to establish the behavioral role of the nucleus accumbens (Nacc) core in the feed-forward spiraling striato-nigro-striatal circuitry that transmits information from the Nacc shell toward the dorsal subregion of the neostriatum (DS) in freely moving rats. Unilateral injection of μ-opioid receptor agonist [D-Ala(2),N-Me-Phe(4),Gly(5)-ol]-enkephalin (DAMGO; 1 and 2 μg), but not the δ 1-opioid receptor agonist [D-Pen(2,5)]-enkephalin (4 μg) or the δ2-opioid receptor agonist [D-Ala(2),Glu(4)]-deltorphin (2 μg), into the ventral tegmental area (VTA) produced contraversive circling in a dose-dependent manner. The effect of DAMGO was μ-opioid receptor-specific, because the μ-opioid receptor antagonist D-Phe-Cys-Tyr-D-Trp-Orn-Thr-Phe-Thr-NH2 (0.1 and 1 μg), which alone did not elicit any turning behavior, dose-dependently inhibited the effect of DAMGO. Injection of the dopamine D1/D2 receptor antagonist cis-(Z)-flupentixol (1 and 10 μg) into the Nacc shell ipsilaterally to the VTA significantly inhibited DAMGO (2 μg)-induced circling. Similar injections of cis-(Z)-flupentixol into the Nacc core inhibited DAMGO-induced circling, but, in addition, replaced circling by pivoting, namely turning behavior during which the rat rotates around its disfunctioning hindlimb. The present findings show that unilateral stimulation of μ-, but not δ-, opioid receptors in the VTA elicits contraversive circling that requires a relatively hyperdopaminergic activity in both the shell and the core of the Nacc at the opioid-stimulated side of the brain. The Nacc core plays an essential role in the transmission of information directing the display of pivoting that is elicited by an increased dopaminergic activity in the Nacc shell. It is concluded that the Nacc core is an essential link in the feed-forward spiraling striato-nigro-striatal circuitry that transmits information from the Nacc shell toward the DS in freely moving rats.

Intracerebroventricular d-Pen2, d-Pen5-enkephalin administration soon after stressor imposition influences behavioral responsivity to a subsequent stressor encounter in CD-1 mice

Endogenous opioid peptide systems diminish stress-induced autonomic nervous system, neuroendocrine (hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis) and behavioral responses, attenuating a collection of physiological symptoms basic to emotional and affective states. Neurogenic stressors may incite specific central changes in opioid peptide availability as well as changes in mu and delta-opioid receptor function. The present investigation evaluated the proactive influence of an intracerebroventricular injection of the opioid receptor agonist D-Pen2, D-Pen5-enkephalin (DPDPE) (0 microg, 0.005 microg, 1.0 microg or 2.5 microg) on locomotor behavior of mice following uncontrollable footshock (Shock) or novel shock chamber exposure (No Shock). It was expected that DPDPE administration following Shock on Day 1 would restore locomotor activity up to 1 week and prevent shock-associated behavior of mice encountering a brief session of footshock 18 days later. Exposure to Shock reduced horizontal locomotor and vertical locomotor (rearing) activity of mice while 2.5 microg DPDPE restored behavior. Eighteen days following Shock and DPDPE challenge, mice were exposed to either an abbreviated session of footshock (Mild Stress) or the shock chamber (Cues). Mice in the No Shock and Shock groups administered 2.5 microg DPDPE on Day 1 did not exhibit any locomotor deficits in response to Mild Stress on Day 18. Mice in the Shock group administered 0.005 microg DPDPE on Day 1, did not exhibit exaggerated rearing deficits following ensuing Mild Stressor encounter relative to mice reexposed to Cues on Day 18. Taken together, these data show that (a) footshock differentially affects rearing and locomotor activity, (b) DPDPE administration increases locomotor activity for up to 1 week following footshock and DPDPE administration, (c) reexposure to Mild Stress affects rearing and locomotor performance differently depending on previous stressor history and DPDPE dose, (d) DPDPE affords long-lasting protection to previously non-stressed mice against the deleterious effects of subsequent mild stress on locomotor activity, while a low dose of DPDE is sufficient to prevent shock-induced sensitization of rearing deficits, 18 days following original stressor and drug presentation. Finally, our investigation demonstrates that DPDPE administration alters the behavioral impact of future stressful encounters and emphasizes the importance of investigating opioid mechanisms in chronic stress disorders.

Role of mu- and delta-opioid receptors in the nucleus accumbens in turning behaviour of rats

The role of mu-, delta1- and delta2-opioid receptors in the nucleus accumbens in pivoting was investigated in freely moving rats. Unilateral injections of the mu-opioid receptor agonist, [D-Ala2,N-Me-Phe4,Gly5-ol]-enkephalin (DAMGO, 1 and 2 microg) and the delta2-opioid receptor agonist, deltorphin II (1 and 2 microg), but not the delta1-opioid receptor agonist, [D-Pen(2,5)]-enkephalin (DPDPE, 1-4 microg), into the shell or the core of the nucleus accumbens significantly induced contraversive pivoting. The pivoting induced by DAMGO (2 microg) and deltorphin II (2 microg) was inhibited significantly by the mu-opioid receptor antagonist, D-Phe-Cys-Tyr-D-Trp-Orn-Thr-Phe-Thr-NH2 (CTOP, 0.1 and 1 microg), and the delta2-opioid receptor antagonist, naltriben (NTB, 0.1 and 1 mg/kg, i.p.), respectively. The DAMGO (2 microg)- or deltorphin II (2 microg)-induced pivoting was also inhibited significantly by co-administration of the dopamine D1/D2 receptor antagonist, cis(Z)-flupentixol (1 and 10 microg). The pivoting induced by unilateral injections of a mixture of dopamine D1 (SKF 38393, 5 microg) and D2 (quinpirole, 10 microg) receptor agonists into the shell was significantly inhibited by cis(Z)-flupentixol (1 and 10 microg) or NTB (1 and 3 mg/kg, i.p.), but not CTOP (1 microg) or delta1-opioid receptor antagonist, (E)-7-benzylidenenaltrexone (1 mg/kg, i.p.). The contraversive pivoting elicited by the cholinergic agonist, carbachol (5 microg), into the core was inhibited by co-administration of the muscarinic M1 antagonist, pirenzepine (1 microg), but not cis(Z)-flupentixol (1 microg). The results suggest that unilateral activation of mu- or delta2-opioid, but not delta1-opioid, receptors in the core and/or shell of the nucleus accumbens elicits contraversive pivoting that requires intact dopamine D1/D2 receptors in the shell, but not intact muscarinic M1 mechanism in the core. The study also shows that delta2-opioid, but not mu- and delta1-opioid, receptors in the core and/or shell modulate the shell-specific, dopamine D1/D2 receptor mechanisms involved in the production of pivoting.

mu/delta Cooperativity and opposing kappa-opioid effects in nucleus accumbens-mediated antinociception in the rat

We previously demonstrated that noxious peripheral stimulation (e.g. subdermal capsaicin injection in the hind paw) produces antinociception that is mediated by opioid receptors in nucleus accumbens. The current study used the trigeminal jaw-opening nociceptive reflex responses in the rat to assess the role of intra-accumbens mu-, delta- and kappa-opioid receptors in the antinociceptive effect of noxious stimulation and intra-accumbens opioid agonism. Whilst intra-accumbens injection of either the mu-receptor-selective antagonist Cys2,Tyr3,Orn5,Pen7amide (CTOP) or the delta-receptor-selective antagonist naltrindole blocked capsaicin-induced antinociception, neither the selective mu-agonist [D-Ala2,N-Me-Phe4,Gly5-ol]-enkephalin (DAMGO; 150 or 300 ng) nor the selective delta-agonist D-Pen2,5-enkephalin (DPDPE; 150 or 300 ng) alone induced antinociception. Simultaneous injection of DAMGO and DPDPE (150 ng each), however, produced significant antinociception. Capsaicin-induced antinociception was not blocked by the selective kappa-receptor antagonist nor-binaltorphimine, but was blocked by the kappa-agonist U69,593. U69,593 also antagonized the antinociceptive effect of the DAMGO/DPDPE combination. Thus, in nucleus accumbens, mu- and delta- but not kappa-opioid receptors contributed to capsaicin-induced antinociception; selective activation of individual receptor subtypes was insufficient, but coactivation of mu- and delta-opioid receptors induced antinociception, and kappa-receptors appeared to play an antianalgesic role in nucleus accumbens.

Localization of the delta-opioid receptor and dopamine transporter in the nucleus accumbens shell: implications for opiate and psychostimulant cross-sensitization

Opiate- and psychostimulant-induced modulation of dopamine transmission in the nucleus accumbens shell (AcbSh) is thought to play a key role in their potent reinforcing and locomotor effects. To investigate the cellular basis for potential functional interactions involving opiates active at the delta-opioid receptor (DOR) and psychostimulants that bind selectively to the dopamine transporter (DAT), we examined the electron microscopic localization of their respective antisera in rat AcbSh. DOR immunoperoxidase labeling was seen primarily, and DAT immunogold particles exclusively, in axon terminals. In these terminals, DOR immunoreactivity was prominently associated with discrete segments of the plasma membrane and the membranes of nearby small synaptic and large dense core vesicles. DAT immunogold particles were almost exclusively distributed along nonsynaptic axonal plasma membranes. Thirty-nine percent DOR-labeled profiles (221/566) either apposed DAT-immunoreactive terminals or also contained DAT. Of these 221 DOR-labeled profiles, 13% were axon terminals containing DAT and 15% were dendritic spines apposed to DAT-immunoreactive terminals. In contrast, 70% were morphologically heterogeneous axon terminals and small axons apposed to DAT-immunoreactive terminals. Our results indicate that DOR agonists in the AcbSh can directly modulate the release of dopamine, as well as postsynaptic responses in spiny neurons that receive dopaminergic input, but act principally to control the presynaptic secretion of other neurotransmitters whose release may influence or be influenced by extracellular dopamine. Thus, while opiates and psychostimulants mainly have differential sites of action, cross-sensitization of their addictive properties may occur through common neuronal targets.

Cellular sites for activation of delta-opioid receptors in the rat nucleus accumbens shell: relationship with Met5-enkephalin

The shell compartment of the nucleus accumbens (AcbSh) is prominently involved in the rewarding aspects of delta-opioid receptor (DOR) agonists, including one of its putative endogenous ligands, Met5-enkephalin (Enk). We examined the ultrastructural immunocytochemical localization of an antipeptide DOR antiserum and an antibody against Enk to determine the major cellular sites for DOR activation and the spatial relationship between DOR and Enk in this region. Sixty percent of DOR-immunoreactive profiles were axon terminals and small unmyelinated axons, whereas the remainder were mainly dendrites and dendritic spines. In axons and terminals, DOR labeling was distributed along plasma and vesicular membranes. DOR-containing terminals were mainly large and primarily formed symmetric synapses or occasionally asymmetric synapses. DOR immunoreactivity also was associated with terminals that were small and formed punctate symmetric or nonrecognizable synapses. Dual immunoperoxidase and immunogold labeling showed that 35% of DOR-labeled axons apposed other terminals that contained Enk. In addition, 25% of the DOR-labeled terminals contained Enk. Thirty-five percent of DOR labeling was observed within dendrites and dendritic spines. DOR-labeled spines showed intense immunoreactivity within asymmetric postsynaptic junctions, which were formed by terminals that lacked Enk immunoreactivity. DOR-labeled spines, however, were apposed to Enk-containing terminals in 13% of all associations between dually labeled profiles. These results provide ultrastructural evidence that activation of DOR in the AcbSh is primarily involved in modulating the presynaptic release of mainly inhibitory, but also excitatory, neurotransmitters. These data also suggest that DOR plays a role in determining the postsynaptic response to excitatory afferents.

Reductions in locomotor activity following central opioid receptor subtype antagonists in rats

Opioid agonists produce biphasic (decreases then increases) effects upon activity in rats. General opioid antagonists typically suppress activity. Selective opioid antagonists reduce weight and food intake. However, the latter effects cannot fully account for the former effects. To assess the possibility that selective opioid antagonists might decrease weight by increasing activity, the present study examined whether central administration of either mu (beta-funaltrexamine: 20 micrograms), mu1 (naloxonazine: 50 micrograms), delta1 ([D-Ala2,Leu5,Cys6]enkephalin: 40 micrograms), delta2 (naltrindole isothiocyanate: 20 micrograms), or kappa1 (nor-binaltorphamine: 20 micrograms) opioid antagonists altered total, ambulatory, or stereotypic activity. Each of the antagonists significantly reduced total (mu: 18%, mu1: 31%, delta1: 42%, delta2: 37%, kappa1: 31%), ambulatory (mu: 17%, mu1: 27%, delta1: 34%, delta2: 37%, kappa1: 31%), and stereotypic (mu: 19%, mu1: 34%, delta1: 49%, delta2: 37%, kappa1: 31%) activity on the first day. All three activity measures were reduced by delta1 and delta2 antagonism on the second day, whereas mu antagonism reduced total and stereotypic activity on the second day. The activity reductions induced by selective opioid receptor subtype antagonists parallel effects induced by general opioid antagonism, and suggest that antagonist-induced weight loss effects independent of intake reductions are not due to antagonist-induced hyperactivity.

Endogenous opiates: 1995

This article is the eighteenth installment of our annual review of research concerning the opiate system. It includes articles published during 1995 reporting the behavioral effects of the opiate peptides and antagonists, excluding the purely analgesic effects. The specific topics covered this year include stress: tolerance and dependence; eating; drinking; gastrointestinal, renal, and hepatic function; mental illness and mood; learning, memory, and reward; cardiovascular responses; respiration and thermoregulation; seizures and other neurological disorders; electrical-related activity; general activity and locomotion; sex, pregnancy, and development; immunological responses; and other behaviors.