Preclinical profile of the mixed 5-HT1A/5-HT2A receptor antagonist S 21,357

Novel class of arylpiperazines containing N-acylated amino acids: Their synthesis, 5-HT1A, 5-HT2A receptor affinity, and in vivo pharmacological evaluation

Novel arylpiperazines with N-acylated amino acids, selected on the basis of a preliminary screening of two libraries previously synthesized on SynPhase Lanterns, were prepared in solution and their affinity for 5-HT(1A), 5-HT(2A), and D(2) receptors was evaluated. The compounds bearing (3-acylamino)pyrrolidine-2,5-dione (19-26) and N-acylprolinamide (29-34) moieties showed high affinity for 5-HT(1A) (K(i)=3-47 nM), high-to-low for 5-HT(2A) (K(i)=4.2-990 nM), and low for D(2) receptors (K(i)=0.77-21.19 microM). All the new o-methoxy derivatives of (3-acylamino)pyrrolidine-2,5-diones tested in vivo revealed agonistic activity at postsynaptic 5-HT(1A) receptors, while m-chloro derivatives were classified as antagonists of these sites; similar relations were observed for o-methoxy (29) and m-chlorophenylpiperazine derivatives of N-acylprolinamides. The reported results show that the amino acid-derived terminal fragment modified the in vivo functional profile. Finally, the selected compounds 19 and 20, a 5-HT(1A) partial agonist and a full agonist, respectively, and 26, a mixed 5-HT(1A)/5-HT(2A) antagonist, were evaluated in preclinical animal models of depression and anxiety. The project allowed selecting the lead compound 20 which exhibited an anxiolytic-like effect in the four-plate test in mice and revealed distinct antidepressant-like effects in the forced swimming and tail suspension tests in mice.

New Arylpiperazine 5-HT1A Receptor Ligands Containing the Pyrimido[2,1-f]purine Fragment: Synthesis, in Vitro, and in Vivo Pharmacological Evaluation

New 1H,3H-pyrimido[2,1-f]purine-2,4-dione derivatives of arylpiperazine (11-22) were prepared and evaluated in vitro for their affinity for 5-HT(1A), 5-HT(2A), alpha(1), and D(2) receptors. The tested compounds showed high affinity for 5-HT(1A) and alpha(1) receptors (K(i) = 1.1-87 and 10-62 nM, respectively) and moderate to low affinity for 5-HT(2A) (K(i) = 56-881 nM) and D(2) receptors (K(i) = 94-1245 nM). Compounds 14, 15, 18, 19, and 21, mostly 3'-chlorophenylpiperazine derivatives, can be classified as mixed 5-HT(1A)/5-HT(2A)/alpha(1) ligands. Compound 13, which showed the highest 5-HT(1A) receptor affinity (K(i) = 1.1 nM), was 50-fold selective in relation to alpha(1) adrenoceptors and at least 250-fold over 5-HT(2A) and D(2) sites. On the basis of in vivo functional tests, 8-phenylpiperazinoethylamino (11), 8-(2'-methoxyphenylpiperazino)ethylamino (13), and 8-phenylpiperazinopropylamino (14) derivatives of 1,3-dimethyl-1H,3H-pyrimido[2,1-f]purine-2,4-dione were identified as potent pre- and postsynaptic 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonists. 1,3-Dimethyl-7-bromo-8-(phenylpiperazinopropylamino)-1H,3H-pyrimido[2,1-f]purine-2,4-dione (20) behaved like an agonist of presynaptic and as a partial agonist of postsynaptic 5-HT(1A) receptors and resembled ipsapirone in terms of functional intrinsic activity. It revealed marked anxiolytic-like activity in the Vogel test in rats, comparable to that of the reference drug diazepam, and exhibited antidepressant-like activity in the Porsolt test in rats. The sedative effect of 20, evaluated in the open field test in rats, appeared at doses twice as high as those inducing a minimal anxiolytic-like effect and was similar to the effects of diazepam.

Pharmacological characterization of MP349, a novel 5-HT1A-receptor antagonist with anxiolytic-like activity, in mice and rats

The purpose of this study was to further characterize the pharmacological effects of MP349 (trans-1-(2-methoxyphenyl)-4-(4-succinimidocyclohexyl)piperazine), a new serotonin 5-HT(1A) postsynaptic receptor antagonist, using several biochemical and behavioural assays. The silent 5-HT(1A)-receptor antagonist WAY 100635 (N-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N-(2-pyridinyl)cyclohexanecarboxamide) was used as a reference compound in in-vivo tests, and diazepam served as standard anxiolytic drug in animal models of anxiety. In this study we showed that MP349 bound with moderate affinity (K(i) = 234 nM) for alpha(1)-adrenoceptors, and with very low affinity (K(i) > 2600 nM) for 5-HT(2A), dopamine D(1), D(2) and benzodiazepine receptors. The effects of MP349 on presynaptic 5-HT(1A) receptors were studied in two models (mice and rats). Like WAY 100635, MP349 antagonized the hypothermia induced by the 5-HT(1A)-receptor agonist 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin(8-OH-DPAT) in mice. Neither MP349 nor WAY 100635 administered alone induced hypothermia. In a rat microdialysis study, MP349 (like WAY 100635) did not affect 5-HT dialysate level in the prefrontal cortex; however, when given before 8-OH-DPAT, it inhibited the decrease in 5-HT release induced by the 5-HT(1A )agonist. The data demonstrated that MP349 behaved like a functional antagonist of presynaptic 5-HT(1A) receptors. The potential anxiolytic activity of MP349 and reference drugs was examined in a conflict drinking test in rats, a plus-maze test in rats and a four-plate test in mice. MP349 and WAY 100635 produced anxiolytic-like effects, though somewhat weaker than those induced by diazepam, and only in the case of diazepam the anxiolytic-like effects were dose-dependent. Moreover, MP349 administered in doses inducing anxiolytic-like effects did not disturb the locomotor activity (open field test) or locomotor coordination (rota-rod test) of rats. These and earlier results indicated that MP349 was an antagonist of 5-HT(1A) receptors which exhibited anxiolytic-like activity in an animal model of anxiety.

The Mouse Defense Test Battery: pharmacological and behavioral assays for anxiety and panic

The Mouse Defense Test Battery was developed from tests of defensive behaviors in rats, reflecting earlier studies of both acute and chronic responses of laboratory and wild rodents to threatening stimuli and situations. It measures flight, freezing, defensive threat and attack, and risk assessment in response to an unconditioned predator stimulus, as well as pretest activity and postthreat (conditioned) defensiveness to the test context. Factor analyses of these indicate four factors relating to cognitive and emotional aspects of defense, flight, and defensiveness to the test context. In the Mouse Defense Test Battery, GABA(A)-benzodiazepine anxiolytics produce consistent reductions in defensive threat/attack and risk assessment, while panicolytic and panicogenic drugs selectively reduce and enhance, respectively, flight. Effects of GABA(A)-benzodiazepine, serotonin, and neuropeptide ligands in the Mouse Defense Test Battery are reviewed. This review suggests that the Mouse Defense Test Battery is a sensitive and appropriate tool for preclinical evaluation of drugs potentially effective against defense-related disorders such as anxiety and panic.

The mouse light/dark box test

The light/dark test is based on the innate aversion of rodents to brightly illuminated areas and on the spontaneous exploratory behaviour of rodents in response to mild stressors, that is, novel environment and light. The test apparatus consists of a small dark safe compartment (one third) and a large illuminated aversive compartment (two thirds). The test was developed with male mice. The strain, weight and age may be crucial factors. The extent to which an anxiolytic compound can facilitate exploratory activity depends on the baseline level in the control group. Differences between the type and severity of external stressors might account for the variable results reported by different laboratories. The light/dark test may be useful to predict anxiolytic-like or anxiogenic-like activity in mice. Transitions have been reported to be an index of activity-exploration because of habituation over time, and the time spent in each compartment to be a reflection of aversion. Classic anxiolytics (benzodiazepines) as well as the newer anxiolytic-like compounds (e.g. serotonergic drugs or drugs acting on neuropeptide receptors) can be detected using this paradigm. It has the advantages of being quick and easy to use, without requiring the prior training of animals.

The mouse light-dark paradigm: a review

1. The light/dark paradigm is based on the innate aversion of rodents to brightly illuminated areas and on the spontaneous exploratory behaviour of the animals, applying mild stressors i.e. novel environment and light. The test apparatus consists of a small dark secure compartment (one third) and a large illuminated aversive compartment (two thirds). 2. The test was developed with male mice. The strain, weight and age may be crucial factors. 3. The extent to which an anxiolytic compound can facilitate the exploratory activity depends on the baseline level in the control group. Differences between the type and severity of external stressors might account for variable results reported by different laboratories. 4. In conclusion, the black and white test may be useful to predict anxiolytic-like or anxiogenic-like activity in mice. Transitions have been reported to be an index of activity-exploration because of habituation over time and the time spent in each compartment to be a reflection of aversion. Classic anxiolytics (benzodiazepines) as well as the newer anxiolytic-like compounds (e.g. serotonergic drugs) can be detected using this paradigm. It has the advantages of being quick and easy to use, without requiring the prior training of animals.

Defensive behaviors in wild and laboratory (Swiss) mice: the mouse defense test battery

The development of laboratory rodent models for elicitation and measurement of a range of defensive behaviors raises the question of the relationship between defense in these animals and those of their wild congeners. To evaluate this relationship for mice, defensive responses to an anesthetized rat were compared for fourth-generation laboratory-bred wild mice and Swiss CD-1 (Swiss-Webster derived) laboratory mice in a Mouse Defense Test Battery. Wild mice showed enhanced levels of both freezing and flight, fleeing from distant approach of the predator in several situations and fleeing more quickly than the Swiss mice. However, Swiss mice did flee upon contact with the rat and also showed levels of several other defensive behaviors (risk assessment, defensive threat, and attack) that were often reliably higher than those of the wild mice. However, when wild mice were prevented from fleeing, their levels of defensive threat and attack were as high as, or at very short prey-predator distances higher than, those of the Swiss mice. These findings suggest that flight and freezing are the major defensive behaviors reduced in Swiss mice and that these reductions allow the appearance of higher levels of additional defensive behaviors in the laboratory animals. However, although Swiss mice do show lower levels of flight and freezing, their patterns of defensive behavior are sufficiently similar to those of wild mice that they provide adequate subjects for research on the biologic bases of defensive behavior. A final experiment indicated that when wild mice are familiarized with a chamber providing a place of concealment, they flee directly to this chamber on presentation of a rat, indicating that flight is a targeted response and not simply an abrupt increase in forward locomotion. Over 10 rat presentation trials with a blocked chamber entrance, however, this response declines.

The influence of 5-HT2 and 5-HT4 receptor antagonists to modify drug induced disinhibitory effects in the mouse light/dark test

1. The ability of 5-HT2 and 5-HT4 receptor antagonists to modify the disinhibitory profile of diazepam and other agents was investigated in male BKW mice in the light/dark test box. 2. The 5-HT2A/2B/2C receptor antagonists ritanserin, MDL11939 and RP62203 and also methysergide, which failed to modify mouse behaviour when administered alone, caused dose-related enhancements (4 to 8 fold) in the potency of diazepam to disinhibit behavioural responding to the aversive situation of the test box. 3. Ritanserin was shown to enhance the disinhibitory potency of other benzodiazepines, chlordiazepoxide (4 fold), temazepam (10 fold) and lorazepam (10 fold), the 5-HT1A receptor ligands, 8-OH-DPAT (25 fold), buspirone (100 fold) and lesopitron (500 fold), the 5-HT3 receptor antagonists, ondansetron (100 fold) R(+)-zacopride (100 fold) and S(-)-zacopride (greater than a 1000 fold), the substituted benzamides, sulpiride (10 fold) and tiapride (5 to 10 fold) and the cholecystokinin (CCK)A receptor antagonist, devazepide (100 fold). It also reduced the onset of action of disinhibition following treatment with the 5-HT synthesis inhibitor parachlorophenylalanine. Ritanserin failed to enhance the disinhibitory effects of the CCKB receptor antagonist CI-988, the angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonist losarten or the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor ceranapril. 4. The 5-HT4 receptor antagonists SDZ205-557, GR113808 and SB204070 caused dose-related reductions in the disinhibitory effect of diazepam, returning values to those shown in vehicle treated controls. The antagonists failed to modify mouse behaviour when administered alone. 5. GR113808 was also shown to cause a dose-related antagonism of the disinhibitory effects of chlordiazepoxide, lorazepam, 8-OH-DPAT, buspirone, lesopitron, ondansetron, R(+)-zacopride, sulpiride, tiapride, devazepide, CI-988, losarten, ceranapril and parachlorophenylalanine. 6. It was concluded that in BKW mice (a) the failure of 5-HT2 and 5-HT4 receptor antagonists when administered alone to modify behaviour in the light/dark test indicates an absence of an endogenous 5-HT tone at the 5-HT2 and 5-HT4 receptors and (b) the enhancement by the 5-HT2 receptor antagonists and attenuation by the 5-HT4 receptor antagonists of drug-induced disinhibition indicates a plurality of 5-HT receptor involvement in the mediation of drug-induced disinhibitory profiles in the mouse.

Differentiation of anxiolytic and panicolytic drugs by effects on rat and mouse defense test batteries

The use of ethoexperimental techniques to elicit and maximize the full range of defensive behaviors of rats and mice enables a very precise analysis of the effects of drugs on these behavior patterns. Two rat defense test batteries (the fear/defense test battery or F/DTB and the anxiety/defense test battery or A/DTB) have provided evidence that anxiolytic drugs, even from different classes, produce a common pattern of changes in specific behaviors. A recently developed mouse defense test battery (MDTB) has enabled description of mouse defensive behaviors to a predator, for comparison to those of rats, and a series of studies of drug effects on the behaviors measured in the MDTB provides evidence of cross-species generality of anxiolytic drug effects, or lack of effect, on specific defensive behaviors. In addition, tests with panicogenic and panicolytic drugs in the MDTB indicate that these enhance and reduce, respectively, flight reactions, which generally are not altered by anxiolytic compounds. Thus, results from the MDTB, taken in conjunction with those of the two rat test batteries and other defense analyses in rats and mice, provide evidence that many defensive behaviors are similar across rodent species, while the differences obtained provide a consistent pattern across situations. Moreover, the defense test batteries may be used to differentiate the effects of drugs effective against generalized anxiety as opposed to panic, through effects on specific defensive behaviors.

Influence of 5-HT1A receptor antagonism on plus-maze behaviour in mice. II. WAY 100635, SDZ 216-525 and NAN-190

To understand further the role of 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor subtype 1A (5-HT1A) mechanisms in anxiety, the behavioural effects of 5-HT1A receptor antagonists with different selectivity and intrinsic activity were examined using an ethological version of the murine elevated plus-maze test. WAY 100635 (0.03-9.0 mg/kg) produced a behavioural profile indicative of an anxiolyticlike effect, with an apparent bell-shaped dose-response relationship and increases in nonexploratory behaviours at the largest dose tested. SDZ 216-525 exerted a dose-dependent antianxiety action at doses of 0.05-0.8 mg/kg, with some loss of activity at 3.2 mg/kg. In contrast, smaller doses of NAN-190 had a significant effect, whereas higher doses (2.5-10.0 mg/kg) decreased locomotor activity and other active behaviours, a profile similar to that produced by the alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonist prazosin (2.5 mg/kg), which also inhibited open arm activity. Findings are discussed in relation to 5-HT1A receptor and alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonism and corresponding neurochemical changes. The results of the present series support the view that 5-HT1A receptor antagonists have therapeutic potential in the management of anxiety.