Sequence organization of the spacer DNA in a ribosomal gene unit of Xenopus laevis

CONNECTING THE DOTS: EPIGENETIC REGULATION OF EXTRACHROMOSOMAL AND INHERITED DNA AMPLIFICATIONS

DNA amplification has intrigued scientists for decades. Since its discovery, significant progress has been made in understanding the mechanisms promoting DNA amplification and their associated function(s). While DNA copy gains were once thought to be regulated purely by stochastic processes, recent findings have revealed the important role of epigenetic modifications in driving these amplifications and their integration into the genome. Furthermore, advances in genomic technology have enabled detailed characterization of these genomic events in terms of size, structure, formation, and regulation. This review highlights how our understanding of DNA amplifications has evolved over time, tracing its trajectory from initial discovery to the contemporary landscape. We describe how recent discoveries have started to uncover how these genomic events occur by controlled biological processes rather than stochastic mechanisms, presenting opportunities for therapeutic modulation.

Different Facets of Copy Number Changes: Permanent, Transient, and Adaptive

Chromosomal copy number changes are frequently associated with harmful consequences and are thought of as an underlying mechanism for the development of diseases. However, changes in copy number are observed during development and occur during normal biological processes. In this review, we highlight the causes and consequences of copy number changes in normal physiologic processes as well as cover their associations with cancer and acquired drug resistance. We discuss the permanent and transient nature of copy number gains and relate these observations to a new mechanism driving transient site-specific copy gains (TSSGs). Finally, we discuss implications of TSSGs in generating intratumoral heterogeneity and tumor evolution and how TSSGs can influence the therapeutic response in cancer.

Enhancer RNAs and regulated transcriptional programs

A large portion of the human genome is transcribed into RNAs without known protein-coding functions, far outnumbering coding transcription units. Extensive studies of long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) have clearly demonstrated that they can play critical roles in regulating gene expression, development, and diseases, acting both as transcriptional activators and repressors. More recently, enhancers have been found to be broadly transcribed, resulting in the production of enhancer-derived RNAs, or eRNAs. Here, we review emerging evidence suggesting that at least some eRNAs contribute to enhancer function. We discuss these findings with respect to potential mechanisms of action of eRNAs and other ncRNAs in regulated gene expression.

Molecular analysis of a NOR site polymorphism in brown trout (Salmo trutta): organization of rDNA intergenic spacers

Using restriction endonuclease mapping, we have analyzed the organization of rDNA (DNA coding for ribosomal RNA (rRNA)) units in the salmonid fish Salmo trutta, as an initial step toward understand the molecular basis of a nucleolar organizer region (NOR) site polymorphism detected in this species. The size of the rDNA units ranged between 15 and 23 kb, with remarkable variation both within individuals and between populations. Three regions of internal tandem repetitiveness responsible for this length polymorphism were located to the intergenic spacers. NOR site polymorphic individuals showed a higher number of length classes, in some cases forming a complete 1 kb fragment ladder. The amount of rRNA genes was as much as 8-fold higher in polymorphic individuals compared with standard individuals. All individuals from the most polymorphic population showed a 14-kb insertion of unknown nature in a small proportion (below 25%) of the 28S rRNA genes.

Noncoding transcription at enhancers: general principles and functional models

Mammalian genomes are extensively transcribed outside the borders of protein-coding genes. Genome-wide studies recently demonstrated that cis-regulatory genomic elements implicated in transcriptional control, such as enhancers and locus-control regions, represent major sites of extragenic noncoding transcription. Enhancer-templated transcripts provide a quantitatively small contribution to the total amount of cellular nonribosomal RNA; nevertheless, the possibility that enhancer transcription and the resulting enhancer RNAs may, in some cases, have functional roles, rather than represent mere transcriptional noise at accessible genomic regions, is supported by an increasing amount of experimental data. In this article we review the current knowledge on enhancer transcription and its functional implications.

DNA replication timing is deterministic at the level of chromosomal domains but stochastic at the level of replicons in Xenopus egg extracts

Replication origins in Xenopus egg extracts are located at apparently random sequences but are activated in clusters that fire at different times during S phase under the control of ATR/ATM kinases. We investigated whether chromosomal domains and single sequences replicate at distinct times during S phase in egg extracts. Replication foci were found to progressively appear during early S phase and foci labelled early in one S phase colocalized with those labelled early in the next S phase. However, the distribution of these two early labels did not coincide between single origins or origin clusters on single DNA fibres. The 4 Mb Xenopus rDNA repeat domain was found to replicate later than the rest of the genome and to have a more nuclease-resistant chromatin structure. Replication initiated more frequently in the transcription unit than in the intergenic spacer. These results suggest for the first time that in this embryonic system, where transcription does not occur, replication timing is deterministic at the scale of large chromatin domains (1–5 Mb) but stochastic at the scale of replicons (10 kb) and replicon clusters (50–100 kb).

Sterility and gene expression in hybrid males of Xenopus laevis and X. muelleri

BACKGROUND

Reproductive isolation is a defining characteristic of populations that represent unique biological species, yet we know very little about the gene expression basis for reproductive isolation. The advent of powerful molecular biology tools provides the ability to identify genes involved in reproductive isolation and focuses attention on the molecular mechanisms that separate biological species. Herein we quantify the sterility pattern of hybrid males in African Clawed Frogs (Xenopus) and apply microarray analysis of the expression pattern found in testes to identify genes that are misexpressed in hybrid males relative to their two parental species (Xenopus laevis and X. muelleri).

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Phenotypic characteristics of spermatogenesis in sterile male hybrids (X. laevis x X. muelleri) were examined using a novel sperm assay that allowed quantification of live, dead, and undifferentiated sperm cells, the number of motile vs. immotile sperm, and sperm morphology. Hybrids exhibited a dramatically lower abundance of mature sperm relative to the parental species. Hybrid spermatozoa were larger in size and accompanied by numerous undifferentiated sperm cells. Microarray analysis of gene expression in testes was combined with a correction for sequence divergence derived from genomic hybridizations to identify candidate genes involved in the sterility phenotype. Analysis of the transcriptome revealed a striking asymmetric pattern of misexpression. There were only about 140 genes misexpressed in hybrids compared to X. laevis but nearly 4,000 genes misexpressed in hybrids compared to X. muelleri.

CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE

Our results provide an important correlation between phenotypic characteristics of sperm and gene expression in sterile hybrid males. The broad pattern of gene misexpression suggests intriguing mechanisms creating the dominance pattern of the X. laevis genome in hybrids. These findings significantly contribute to growing evidence for allelic dominance in hybrids and have implications for the mechanism of species differentiation at the transcriptome level.

Xenopus ribosomal RNA gene intergenic spacer elements conferring transcriptional enhancement and nucleolar dominance-like competition in oocytes

Repeated within the intergenic spacers that separate adjacent ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes in Xenopus laevis are several distinct sequence elements. These include transcription terminators, "region 0" repeats, "region 1" repeats, duplicated spacer promoters, and 42-bp enhancer elements that are embedded within 60 or 81-bp repeats. All have been reported to stimulate RNA polymerase I transcription from an adjacent gene promoter. A greater number of 42-bp enhancers/gene have been suggested to explain the preferential transcription of X. laevis rRNA genes in X. laevis x Xenopus borealis hybrids, an epigenetic phenomenon known as nucleolar dominance. However, the possible contribution of regions 0/1 and/or spacer promoters to the preferential transcription of X. laevis (over X. borealis) rRNA genes has never been tested directly. In this study, we systematically tested the various intergenic spacer elements for their contributions to promoter strength and nucleolar dominance-like competition in oocytes. In disagreement with a previous report, region 0 and region 1 repeats do not have significant enhancer activity, nor do they play a discernible role in X. laevis-X. borealis rRNA gene competition. Minigenes containing X. laevis spacer sequences are only dominant over minigenes having complete X. borealis spacers if a spacer promoter is located upstream of the 42-bp enhancers; X. laevis enhancers alone are not sufficient. These results provide additional evidence that spacer promoters together with adjacent enhancers form a functional activating unit in Xenopus oocytes.

Molecular evolution of ribosomal intergenic spacers in Odontophrynus americanus 2n and 4n (Amphibia: Anura)

Ribosomal intergenic spacers (IGSs) of Odontophrynus americanus 2n and 4n were cloned, restriction mapped, and partially sequenced. Three distinct regions, namely alpha, beta, and delta, were identified in the IGSs. The alpha and beta regions flanked the 28S and 18S rRNA genes, respectively, conserving an identical restriction pattern at each ploidy level. The delta region, located between alpha and beta, was highly variable in size and restriction pattern, enclosing different BamHI subrepeats (B-SR), 87- to 530-bp-long. Sequence analysis showed that B-SRs were composed mainly of different arrangements of similar blocks of sequences. Another family of repetitive sequences was found in the delta region, clustered inside large BamHI fragments. These subrepeats are 189-bp-long and, although very similar in diploid and tetraploid IGSs, show a pattern of concerted evolution. A hypothetical functional role for the 189-bp repeats is discussed in view of their predicted secondary structure and presence of potential E2 binding sites inside diploid subrepeats. Although the same structural elements were present both in diploid and tetraploid IGSs, the higher level of repeatability of tetraploid IGSs suggests that common ancestor sequences have undergone several rounds of amplification after O. americanus polyploidy.

UBF binding in vivo is not restricted to regulatory sequences within the vertebrate ribosomal DNA repeat

The HMG box containing protein UBF binds to the promoter of vertebrate ribosomal repeats and is required for their transcription by RNA polymerase I in vitro. UBF can also bind in vitro to a variety of sequences found across the intergenic spacer in Xenopus and mammalian ribosomal DNA (rDNA) repeats. The high abundance of UBF, its colocalization with rDNA in vivo, and its DNA binding characteristics, suggest that it plays a more generalized structural role over the rDNA repeat. Until now this view has not been supported by any in vivo data. Here, we utilize chromatin immunoprecipitation from a highly enriched nucleolar chromatin fraction to show for the first time that UBF binding in vivo is not restricted to known regulatory sequences but extends across the entire intergenic spacer and transcribed region of Xenopus, human, and mouse rDNA repeats. These results are consistent with a structural role for UBF at active nucleolar organizer regions in addition to its recognized role in stable transcription complex formation at the promoter.

Modeling of DNA local parameters predicts encrypted architectural motifs in Xenopus laevis ribosomal gene promoter

We have modeled local DNA sequence parameters to search for DNA architectural motifs involved in transcription regulation and promotion within the Xenopus laevis ribosomal gene promoter and the intergenic spacer (IGS) sequences. The IGS was found to be shaped into distinct topological domains. First, intrinsic bends split the IGS into domains of common but different helical features. Local parameters at inter-domain junctions exhibit a high variability with respect to intrinsic curvature, bendability and thermal stability. Secondly, the repeated sequence blocks of the IGS exhibit right-handed supercoiled structures which could be related to their enhancer properties. Thirdly, the gene promoter presents both inherent curvature and minor groove narrowing which may be viewed as motifs of a structural code for protein recognition and binding. Such pre-existing deformations could simply be remodeled during the binding of the transcription complex. Alternatively, these deformations could pre-shape the promoter in such a way that further remodeling is facilitated. Mutations shown to abolish promoter curvature as well as intrinsic minor groove narrowing, in a variant which maintained full transcriptional activity, bring circumstantial evidence for structurally-preorganized motifs in relation to transcription regulation and promotion. Using well documented X. laevis rDNA regulatory sequences we showed that computer modeling may be of invaluable assistance in assessing encrypted architectural motifs. The evidence of these DNA topological motifs with respect to the concept of structural code is discussed.

Regulation of mammalian ribosomal gene transcription by RNA polymerase I

All cells, from prokaryotes to vertebrates, synthesize vast amounts of ribosomal RNA to produce the several million new ribosomes per generation that are required to maintain the protein synthetic capacity of the daughter cells. Ribosomal gene (rDNA) transcription is governed by RNA polymerase I (Pol I) assisted by a dedicated set of transcription factors that mediate the specificity of transcription and are the targets of the pleiotrophic pathways the cell uses to adapt rRNA synthesis to cell growth. In the past few years we have begun to understand the specific functions of individual factors involved in rDNA transcription and to elucidate on a molecular level how transcriptional regulation is achieved. This article reviews our present knowledge of the molecular mechanism of rDNA transcriptional regulation.

A ribosomal orphon sequence from Xenopus laevis flanked by novel low copy number repetitive elements

We have used a differential cloning approach to isolate ribosomal/non-ribosomal frontier sequences from Xenopus laevis. A ribosomal intergenic spacer sequence (IGS) was cloned and shown not to be physically linked with the ribosomal locus. This ribosomal orphon contained the IGS sequences found immediately downstream of the 28S gene and included an array of enhancer repetitions and a non-functional spacer promoter. The orphon sequence was flanked by a member of the novel 'Frt' low copy repetitive element family. Three individual Frt repeats were sequenced and all members of this family were shown to lie clustered at two chromosomal sites, one of which contained the ribosomal orphon. One of the Frt elements contained an insertion of 297 bp that showed extensive homology to sequences within at least three other Xenopus genes. Each homology region was flanked by members of the T2 family of short interspersed repetitive elements, (SINEs), and by its target insertion sequence, suggesting multiple translocation events. The data are discussed in terms of the evolution of the ribosomal gene locus.

Nucleosome binding by the polymerase I transactivator upstream binding factor displaces linker histone H1

Upstream binding factor (UBF) is a vertebrate RNA polymerase I transcription factor that can bend and wrap DNA. To investigate UBF's likely role as an architectural protein of rRNA genes organized in chromatin, we tested UBF's ability to bind rRNA gene enhancers assembled into nucleosome cores (DNA plus core histones) and nucleosomes (DNA plus core histones plus histone H1). UBF bound with low affinity to nucleosome cores formed with enhancer DNA probes of 162 bp. However, on nucleosome cores which contained approximately 60 bp of additional linker DNA, UBF bound with high affinity similar to its binding to naked DNA, forming a ternary DNA-core histone-UBF complex. UBF could be stripped from ternary complexes with competitor DNA to liberate nucleosome cores, rather than free DNA, suggesting that UBF binding to nucleosome cores does not displace the core histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4. DNase I, micrococcal nuclease, and exonuclease III footprinting suggests that UBF and histone H1 interact with DNA on both sides flanking the histone octamer. Footprinting shows that UBF outcompetes histone H1 for binding to a nucleosome core and will displace, if not dissociate, H1 from its binding site on a preassembled nucleosome. These data suggest that UBF may act to prevent or reverse the assembly of transcriptionally inactive chromatin structures catalyzed by linker histone binding.

Epigenetic silencing of RNA polymerase I transcription: a role for DNA methylation and histone modification in nucleolar dominance

Nucleolar dominance is an epigenetic phenomenon that describes nucleolus formation around rRNA genes inherited from only one progenitor of an interspecific hybrid or allopolyploid. The phenomenon is widespread, occurring in plants, insects, amphibians, and mammals, yet its molecular basis remains unclear. We have demonstrated nucleolar dominance in three allotetraploids of the plant genus Brassica. In Brassica napus, accurately initiated pre-rRNA transcripts from one progenitor, Brassica rapa are detected readily, whereas transcripts from the approximately 3000 rRNA genes inherited from the other progenitor, Brassica oleracea, are undetectable. Nuclear run-on confirmed that dominance is controlled at the level of transcription. Growth of B. napus seedlings on 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine to inhibit cytosine methylation caused the normally silent, under-dominant B. oleracea rRNA genes to become expressed to high levels. The histone deacetylase inhibitors sodium butyrate and trichostatin A also derepressed silent rRNA genes. These results reveal an enforcement mechanism for nucleolar dominance in which DNA methylation and histone modifications combine to regulate rRNA gene loci spanning tens of megabase pairs of DNA.

The repeat organizer, a specialized insulator element within the intergenic spacer of the Xenopus rRNA genes

We have identified a novel activity for the region of the intergenic spacer of the Xenopus laevis rRNA genes that contains the 35- and 100-bp repeats. We devised a new assay for this region by constructing DNA plasmids containing a tandem repeat of rRNA reporter genes that were separated by the 35- and 100-bp repeat region and a rRNA gene enhancer. When the 35- and 100-bp repeat region is present in its normal position and orientation at the 3' end of the rRNA reporter genes, the enhancer activates the adjacent downstream promoter but not the upstream rRNA promoter on the same plasmid. Because this element can restrict the range of an enhancer's activity in the context of tandem genes, we have named it the repeat organizer (RO). The ability to restrict enhancer action is a feature of insulator elements, but unlike previously described insulator elements the RO does not block enhancer action in a simple enhancer-blocking assay. Instead, the activity of the RO requires that it be in its normal position and orientation with respect to the other sequence elements of the rRNA genes. The enhancer-binding transcription factor xUBF also binds to the repetitive sequences of the RO in vitro, but these sequences do not activate transcription in vivo. We propose that the RO is a specialized insulator element that organizes the tandem array of rRNA genes into single-gene expression units by promoting activation of a promoter by its proximal enhancers.

Virtually the entire Xenopus laevis rDNA multikilobase intergenic spacer serves to stimulate polymerase I transcription

The promoter-distal half of the spacer separating the tandem Xenopus laevis rRNA genes consists of "0" and "1" repetitive elements that have been considered unimportant in polymerase I transcriptional activation. Utilizing oocyte microinjection, we now demonstrate that the 0/1 region, as well as its component 0 and 1 repeats, substantially stimulate transcription from a ribosomal promoter in cis and inhibit transcription when located in trans. Both the cis and trans responses increase linearly with increasing numbers of 0 or 1 repeats until saturation is approached. The 0/1 block and its component elements stimulate transcription in both orientations, over distances, and when placed downstream of the initiation site, properties for which the 60/81-base pair (bp) repeats have been defined as polymerase I enhancers. In their natural promoter-distal rDNA location, the 0/1 repeats can stimulate transcription from the rRNA gene promoter, above the level afforded by the intervening 60/81-bp repeats and spacer promoter. In addition, as with the 60/81-bp repeats, the 0/1 repeats bind a factor in common with the rDNA promoter. Thus, the entire X. laevis rDNA intergenic spacer (the 0 repeats, 1 repeats, spacer promoter repeats, and 60/81-bp repeats) acts together to enhance ribosomal transcription.

Multiparameter microscopic analysis of nucleolar structure and ribosomal gene transcription

A survey of novel microscopic approaches for structural and functional analysis of subnucleolar compartments will be presented. Research on nucleolar structure and function concentrates predominantly on two distinct types of nucleoli: (1) nucleoli present during the interphase of the cell cycle in somatic tissue culture cells and (2) nucleoli present in meiotic cells, e.g. oocytes of amphibians. These nucleoli are found during meiotic prophase of oogenesis and are functional during several months of the diplotene stage of oogenesis. A further characteristic is the fact that these nucleoli are extrachromosomal, since they originate by selective ribosomal DNA (rDNA) amplification during the early pachytene stage of oogenesis. Miller-type chromatin spread preparations using transcriptionally active nucleoli, to a major part, contributed to our understanding of the structural organization of polymerase I directed pre-rRNA transcription. Although the structural organization of the template-associated pre-rRNA transcript is known in some detail from chromatin spreads, relatively little is known about structural aspects of pre-rRNA processing. In order to investigate this intriguing question in more detail, we have developed a computer-based densitometry analysis of both template-associated and template-dissociated pre-rRNA transcripts in order to follow the structural modification of pre-rRNA transcripts during processing. Another line of experiments is devoted to the in situ structure of actively transcribing genes in the nucleolus. In order to bridge the gap between light microscopy and electron microscopy we started video-enhanced light microscopical analysis of actively transcribing genes. Although the dimensions of individual spread genes are critical for detection by optical microscopy, we succeeded in obtaining the first series of images of transcribing genes in their "native' hydrated state. An additional promising type of microscopy is transmission X-ray microscopy. Recent progress in instrumentation as well as in sample preparation has allowed us to obtain the first images of density distribution within intact, fully hydrated nucleoli using amplitude-contrast and/or phase-contrast X-ray microscopy of non-contrasted, fully hydrated nucleoli at different states of transcriptional activity. Whereas the above mentioned investigations using video microscopy and X-ray microscopy are predominantly applicable to the analysis of amplified nucleoli in amphibian oocytes, which are characterized by an extremely high transcription rate of 80-90% of rDNA genes per individual nucleolus, structural analysis of the in situ arrangement of actively transcribing genes in somatic nucleoli as present in the interphase nucleus is far more difficult to perform, mainly due to the much lower number of simultaneously transcribed active genes per individual nucleolus. Visualization of actively transcribed gene clusters is approached by an integrated experimental assay using video microscopy, confocal laser scan microscopy, and antibodies against specific nucleolar proteins.

Identification and analysis of the start site of ribosomal RNA transcription of Entamoeba histolytica

In this article we report the identification of the start site of ribosomal RNA transcription unit of the enteric parasite E. histolytica. We cloned the upstream region of the ribosomal RNA and we defined the 5' boundary of the transcription unit with nuclear run-on assays. We report that ribosomal transcription starts 2447 bp upstream the SSU ribosomal gene, at an adenosine residue. This data was supported both by S1 mapping and by primer extension analysis; that the mapped site was indeed the transcription start point was demonstrated by RNAse protection of the in vitro capped RNA. Our sequence data around the transcription start point shows two different tandem repeat clusters immediately downstream from the transcription start point.

Ribosomal gene promoter domains can function as artificial enhancers of RNA polymerase I transcription, supporting a promoter origin for natural enhancers in Xenopus

Enhancers of RNA polymerase I transcription in higher eukaryotes are repetitive elements within the intergenic spacers of rRNA genes. In Xenopus and mouse, enhancers and the gene promoter bind the activator protein, upstream binding factor, and in Xenopus, enhancers also share sequence similarity with an upstream domain of the promoter. This upstream promoter domain can act as an efficient enhancer when polymerized and cloned adjacent to a ribosomal gene promoter injected into oocytes. A core promoter domain lacking similarity with spacer sequences in Xenopus laevis but analogous to a repeated sequence in Xenopus borealis can also function as an enhancer. These data demonstrate functional relatedness between the promoter and enhancers, supporting the hypothesis that enhancers could have evolved from duplicated promoter domains that bind essential transcription factors. The ability of upstream binding factor to bind enhancers inactivated by mutation suggests that upstream binding factor binding alone cannot explain enhancer function.

Structure of the intergenic spacer region from the ribosomal RNA gene family of white spruce (Picea glauca)

Five genomic clones containing ribosomal DNA repeats from the gymnosperm white spruce (Picea glauca) have been isolated and characterized by restriction enzyme analysis. No nucleotide variation or length variation was detected within the region encoding the ribosomal RNAs. Four clones which contained the intergenic spacer (IGS) region from different rDNA repeats were further characterized to reveal the sub-repeat structure within the IGS. The sub-repeats were unusually long, ranging from 540 to 990 bp but in all other respects the structure of the IGS was very similar to the organization of the IGS from wheat, Drosophila and Xenopus.

Cooperative binding of the Xenopus RNA polymerase I transcription factor xUBF to repetitive ribosomal gene enhancers

Upstream binding factor (UBF) is a DNA-binding transcription factor implicated in ribosomal gene promoter and enhancer function in vertebrates. UBF is unusual in that it has multiple DNA-binding domains with homology to high-mobility-group (HMG) nonhistone chromosomal proteins 1 and 2. However, a recognizable DNA consensus sequence for UBF binding is lacking. In this study, we have used gel retardation and DNase I footprinting to examine Xenopus UBF (xUBF) binding to Xenopus laevis ribosomal gene enhancers. We show that UBF has a minimum requirement for about 60 bp of DNA, the size of the short enhancer variant in X. laevis. Stronger UBF binding occurs on the longer enhancer variant (81 bp) and on multiple enhancers linked head to tail. In vivo, Xenopus ribosomal gene enhancers exist in blocks of 10 alternating 60- and 81-bp repeats within the intergenic spacer. In vitro, UBF binds cooperatively to probes with 10 enhancers, with five intermediate complexes observed in titration experiments. This suggests that, on average, one UBF dimer binds every two enhancers. A single UBF dimer can produce a DNase I footprint ranging in size from approximately 30 to about 115 bp on enhancer probes of different lengths. This observation is consistent with the hypothesis that multiple DNA-binding domains or subdomains within UBF bind independently, forming more-stable interactions on longer probes.

Cooperative binding of the Xenopus RNA polymerase I transcription factor xUBF to repetitive ribosomal gene enhancers

Upstream binding factor (UBF) is a DNA-binding transcription factor implicated in ribosomal gene promoter and enhancer function in vertebrates. UBF is unusual in that it has multiple DNA-binding domains with homology to high-mobility-group (HMG) nonhistone chromosomal proteins 1 and 2. However, a recognizable DNA consensus sequence for UBF binding is lacking. In this study, we have used gel retardation and DNase I footprinting to examine Xenopus UBF (xUBF) binding to Xenopus laevis ribosomal gene enhancers. We show that UBF has a minimum requirement for about 60 bp of DNA, the size of the short enhancer variant in X. laevis. Stronger UBF binding occurs on the longer enhancer variant (81 bp) and on multiple enhancers linked head to tail. In vivo, Xenopus ribosomal gene enhancers exist in blocks of 10 alternating 60- and 81-bp repeats within the intergenic spacer. In vitro, UBF binds cooperatively to probes with 10 enhancers, with five intermediate complexes observed in titration experiments. This suggests that, on average, one UBF dimer binds every two enhancers. A single UBF dimer can produce a DNase I footprint ranging in size from approximately 30 to about 115 bp on enhancer probes of different lengths. This observation is consistent with the hypothesis that multiple DNA-binding domains or subdomains within UBF bind independently, forming more-stable interactions on longer probes.

Amphibian oocytes and sphere organelles: are the U snRNA genes amplified?

The sphere organelles (spheres) of Xenopus and other amphibian oocytes are known to contain small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles (snRNPs) and have been suggested to play a role in snRNP complex assembly. Coupled with the similarities that exist between spheres and nucleoli and the quantitative and kinetic aspects of snRNA synthesis in the Xenopus oocyte, we have investigated whether or not the U snRNA encoding genes are amplified in Xenopus oogenesis, the spheres being possible sites for the location of such extrachromosomal gene copies. By applying a number of quantitative nucleic acid hybridization procedures to both total and fractionated oocyte and somatic DNA, employing both homologous and heterologous U snRNA gene probes and suitable amplification and non-amplification control probes, we show that the U snRNA genes do not undergo any major amplification in Xenopus oogenesis. Therefore, the analogy between the sphere organelles and nucleoli appears to be limited. The role of the spheres and their relationship to other snRNP containing structures, specifically B snurposomes, and the sphere organizer loci remains obscure.

The genome size and the structure and content of ribosomal RNA genes in Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua L.)

1. The haploid genome size of the Atlantic cod was estimated to 3.4 x 10(8)kb by reassociation kinetics analysis of cod sperm DNA. 2. The size of the small and large subunit ribosomal RNAs is 1.85 and 4.1 kb, respectively. 3. Restriction enzyme mapping of the rRNA coding unit revealed conservation of an Eco RI site in the coding regions of 18 S and 28 S rRNA and a Bam HI site in the 28 S rRNA coding region compared to other fish species. 4. The length of the repeat unit of the cod rDNA was found to be 30 kb. 5. The rRNA genes are repeated approximately 50 times in the cod genome and constitutes 0.08% of the cod genetic material.

Nucleotide sequence of the Urechis caupo core histone gene tandem repeat

The 4942 bp nucleotide sequence of a repeating unit from the core histone gene tandem repeat of Urechis caupo and the predicted amino acid sequence of the four core histones are presented. Putative promoter elements including the CAP site and TATA box as well as multiple CAAT-like sequences are identified upstream from each gene. Upstream from each core histone gene are 26 or 30 bp sequences that may have a promoter function and appear to be unique to Urechis histone genes. Located 5' to both H2A and H2B is the 26 bp sequence, GGTCATGTGACTCTAATACCGCGCTG. An identical, but inverted, 26 bp sequence is present upstream of H4. Upstream from the H3 gene, two regions of a 30 bp sequence, GGTCTTGTGGCGGGAACAAATACCGCAACG, are very similar to corresponding regions of the 26 bp sequence. Additional 10 bp conserved sequences, CAGCGGGCGC, are present only upstream from the H2A and H2B genes. Conserved sequences containing a region of dyad symmetry followed by a purine-rich sequence that are typical of histone mRNA termination sites are present 27 to 36 bp 3' from the termination codon. Short repetitive DNA sequence elements are present in the spacer sequences between the H2A and H3 genes and the H2B and H4 gene.

Faithful in vivo transcription termination of Xenopus laevis rDNA. Correlation of electron microscopic spread preparations with S1 transcript analysis

DNA sequencing and subsequent functional in vitro analysis of the Xenopus laevis rDNA transcription termination has led to the identification of three transcription termination sequence elements: T1, located at the 3' end of the 28S rDNA; T2, a putative processing site 235 bp downstream of T1; T3, the principal terminator positioned 215 bp upstream of the gene promoter. As demonstrated for nuclear run-off assays, T3 was found to be the main terminator for Xenopus rDNA transcription. These in vitro data are in obvious contradiction to results obtained by electron microscopic (EM) spread preparations from rapidly isolated amplified oocyte nucleoli, i.e., an rDNA chromatin probe thought to represent the in vivo situation, indicative of transcription termination at sites T1-2. However, most interestingly, T3 had--again by the EM method--been identified as the exclusive terminator for NTS spacer transcription units. In order to answer the question of whether read-through transcription of the complete rDNA spacer sequence is obligatory for 40S pre-rRNA in vivo transcription, we analyzed several hundreds of spread rRNA genes from Xenopus oocyte nucleoli in great detail, applying two different spreading procedures, e.g., dispersal of amplified oocyte nucleoli shortly in detergent-free or detergent containing low-salt media prior to the EM spreading technique. Quantitation of EM spreads resulted in the finding that read-through rDNA spacer transcription beyond T1-2 termination sites (i.e., indicative of T3 transcription termination) can be visualized for the in vivo situation at a frequency of less than 3% of rRNA genes analyzed.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Xenopus transcription factors: key molecules in the developmental regulation of differential gene expression

Images

Repeats and subrepeats in the intergenic spacer of rDNA from the nematode Meloidogyne arenaria

Ribosomal DNA (rDNA) repeats of the plant-parasitic nematode Meloidogyne arenaria are heterogeneous in size and appear to contain 5S rRNA gene sequences. Moreover, in a recA+ bacterial host, plasmid clones of a 9 kb rDNA repeat show deletion events within a 2 kb intergenic spacer (IGS), between 28S and 5S DNA sequences. These deletions appear to result from a reduction in the number of tandem 129 bp repeats in the IGS. The loss of such repeats might explain how rDNA length heterogeneity, observed in the Meloidogyne genome, could have arisen. Each 129 bp repeat also contains three copies of an 8 bp subrepeat, which has sequence similarity to an element found in the IGS repeats of some plant rDNAs.

Structural organization of Acheta rDNA. Evidence for differential amplification of soma and germ-line-specific rDNA sequences

Amplification is one of the mechanisms whereby the expression of genes can be specifically reinforced. Ribosomal gene amplification in amphibian and insect oocytes is a particularly well documented case. We studied heterogeneity, amplification and size of Acheta domesticus (insects; Orthoptera) ribosomal DNA and characteristics of male and female somatic or germ line rDNAs by analysis of genomic clones from a conventional and a microclone library. The length of the Acheta rDNA repeat unit (transcription unit and non-transcribed spacer (NTS] varied from 47 x 10(3) to 60 x 10(3) base-pairs, with highest variability within the NTS region. Deletions, fragment length heterogeneity and size variability in small steps of individual NTS segments are responsible for the observed size variation. The number of rDNA repeat units per haploid genome of Acheta was determined as 190(+/- 10%). The rDNA is amplified 14(+/- 10%)-fold in the oocyte, producing about 10,000 gene copies per cell. Our results show that the amplification mechanism does not favor individual fragments within the repeat unit. Thus, it can be concluded that amplification does not change the chromosomal characteristics of the rDNA pool. Two fragments specific for oocyte rDNA suggest that the rearrangements accompanying amplification are preferentially located in one distinct EcoRI fragment. Certain regions of Acheta rDNA contain cell-type-specific fragments: it was thus possible to characterize one purely male fragment and a second one specific for male and female soma but not for germ line rDNA. We show that Acheta rDNA reveals a combination of many features reported from different organisms and novel tissue-specific alterations on an extremely large repeat unit. The tissue-specific alterations indicate sexual and soma/germ line differentiation events that are derived by as yet unknown mechanisms.

Enhancers for RNA polymerase I in mouse ribosomal DNA

The intergenic spacer of the mouse ribosomal genes contains repetitive 140-base-pair (bp) elements which we show are enhancers for RNA polymerase I transcription analogous to the 60/81-bp repetitive enhancers (enhancers containing a 60-bp and an 81-bp element) previously characterized from Xenopus laevis. In rodent cell transfection assays, the 140-bp repeats stimulated an adjacent mouse polymerase I promoter when located in cis and competed with it when located in trans. Remarkably, in frog oocyte injection assays, the 140-bp repeats enhanced a frog ribosomal gene promoter as strongly as did the homologous 60/81-bp repeats. Mouse 140-bp repeats also competed against frog promoters in trans. The 140-bp repeats bound UBF, a DNA-binding protein we have purified from mouse extracts that is the mouse homolog of polymerase I transcription factors previously isolated from frogs and humans. The DNA-binding properties of UBF are conserved from the mouse to the frog. The same regulatory elements (terminators, gene and spacer promoters, and enhancers) have now been identified in both a mammalian and an amphibian spacer, and they are found in the same relative order. Therefore, this arrangement of elements probably is widespread in nature and has important functional consequences.

Enhancers for RNA polymerase I in mouse ribosomal DNA

The intergenic spacer of the mouse ribosomal genes contains repetitive 140-base-pair (bp) elements which we show are enhancers for RNA polymerase I transcription analogous to the 60/81-bp repetitive enhancers (enhancers containing a 60-bp and an 81-bp element) previously characterized from Xenopus laevis. In rodent cell transfection assays, the 140-bp repeats stimulated an adjacent mouse polymerase I promoter when located in cis and competed with it when located in trans. Remarkably, in frog oocyte injection assays, the 140-bp repeats enhanced a frog ribosomal gene promoter as strongly as did the homologous 60/81-bp repeats. Mouse 140-bp repeats also competed against frog promoters in trans. The 140-bp repeats bound UBF, a DNA-binding protein we have purified from mouse extracts that is the mouse homolog of polymerase I transcription factors previously isolated from frogs and humans. The DNA-binding properties of UBF are conserved from the mouse to the frog. The same regulatory elements (terminators, gene and spacer promoters, and enhancers) have now been identified in both a mammalian and an amphibian spacer, and they are found in the same relative order. Therefore, this arrangement of elements probably is widespread in nature and has important functional consequences.

The ribosomal genes of the mosquito, Aedes aegypti

The characterisation of the ribosomal genes of the mosquito, Aedes aegypti, is described. Preliminary experiments using a cloned Drosophila ribosomal DNA (rDNA) repeat to probe Southern transfers of Ae. aegypti genomic DNA has indicated that the rDNA repeat of Ae. aegypti is 9.0 kb in length and that individual rDNA repeats exhibit a high degree of homogeneity with respect to length and the position of restriction enzyme recognition sites within the rDNA. The preliminary mapping data together with partial digestion experiments demonstrate that, as in all other higher eukaryotes, the rDNA repeats are arranged in a head-to-tail, tandemly repeating manner. The restriction mapping of cloned rDNA repeats confirmed the largely uniform length of the Ae. aegypti rDNA repeat and provided a more detailed physical map of the DNA. A restriction site polymorphism was detected in one clone (Aar9) which contains an extra HincII site, which is not present in three other clones studied (Aar1, Aar3, or Aar7). Transcription mapping has allowed the allocation of identities to the various restriction fragments and the approximate positioning of the transcription unit. The estimate of rDNA repeat copy number in Ae. aegypti (approximately 500 copies per haploid genome) is similar to the estimate reported for the closely related species, Aedes albopictus, of 430 copies per haploid genome. Ribosomal DNA thus comprises approximately 0.6% of the total Ae. aegypti genome. Analysis of the variation of the rDNA repeat unit both within individual mosquitoes and between strains of Ae. aegypti, has severed to confirm the remarkable homogeneity of the rDNA repeat unit in this insect.

A transcription factor, TFIS, interacts with both the promoter and enhancer of the Xenopus rRNA genes

An activity that binds sequence specifically to the enhancer of the Xenopus laevis rRNA genes has been highly purified. This activity stimulates transcription of coinjected rRNA templates in Xenopus oocytes and has been named TFIS, as it binds to the enhancer sequences within the intergenic spacer. In addition to its enhancer binding activity, TFIS binds to the promoter of the Xenopus rRNA genes, as predicted by models for enhancer action. DNase I footprinting on promoter mutants suggests that there are three TFIS-binding sites between -70 and -240 and that TFIS binding is unusually tolerant of mutations. The large region of protein-DNA interaction and the occurrence of DNase I enhancements at integral multiples of the helical repeat are consistent with the promoter and enhancer DNA wrapping around TFIS.

Transactivation of the Xenopus rRNA gene promoter by its enhancer

A key question concerning the mechanism of transcriptional activation by enhancers is about the role of the DNA that connects the enhancer to the promoter. The linking DNA will be important if a regulatory protein(s) binds to the enhancer and then tracks or slides along the DNA to the promoter, or if, on binding, the protein(s) alters the topological state of the DNA. By contrast, if the linking DNA loops out to allow the formation of a promoter-enhancer complex, or if the enhancer increases the local concentration of a transcription factor, co-linearity of the promoter and the enhancer will not be strictly required. In Xenopus laevis, the transcription of the ribosomal RNA genes is stimulated by an enhancer composed of repetitive sequences in the intergenic spacer regions. These repetitive elements contain 60 or 81 base pairs, and their activity is relatively independent of their position and orientation. When the enhancer and promoter sequences are each located on separate DNA molecules, however, the enhancer is no longer able to augment transcription. We have now tested whether or not this apparent requirement for having the enhancer and promoter in cis can be overcome by keeping them in close proximity while locating them separately on different molecules. This was achieved by generating multiply intertwined, dimeric-catenanes in which the enhancer and promoter were located in trans on different rings. By injecting these catenanes into frog oocytes and measuring the activity of the enhancers in a series of competition assays, we were able to demonstrate that such enhancers can augment transcription in vivo.

Supercoiled loop organization of genomic DNA: a close relationship between loop domains, expression units, and replicon organization in rDNA from Xenopus laevis

Analysis of the organization of a specific chromosomal gene, the gene for rRNA in Xenopus laevis, has evidenced a close relationship between loop organization, replication organization, and expression units. The nontranscribed spacer appears to be involved in all three levels of organization. Furthermore the replication origin region appears to be involved in nuclear matrix anchorage and is closely related to the 40 S transcription promoter. This organization suggests how expression domains may be regulated and how this functional organization may be transmitted to daughter cells after DNA replication, thus allowing selected expression patterns not to be lost during development.

Extra-ribosomal spacer sequences in Triturus

We show that, in Triturus vulgaris meridionalis, sequences homologous to the rDNA "non-transcribed" spacer (NTS) are clustered at chromosomal loci where they are not associated with 18 S or 28 S rDNA genes: these sequences are referred to as the extra-ribosomal spacer sequences. Genomic clones containing such extra-ribosomal spacer sequences have been isolated. As shown by restriction mapping, these clones appear to consist mostly of repetitive BamHI fragments that are, in turn, internally repetitious and highly homologous to each other. The structure of the clones was confirmed by nucleotide sequence analysis, which also demonstrates the high degree of conservation between the BamHI elements and the homologous NTS sequences. An intriguing 12 base-pair homology between the extra-ribosomal spacer sequences and a Xenopus NTS enhancer sequence is reported. The possibility that a repetitive octanucleotide motif found within the BamHI elements could act as a recombination hotspot by virtue of its similarity with the Escherichia coli chi sequence is discussed.

The organization and composition of the ribosomal RNA gene non-transcribed spacer of D. busckii is unique among the drosophilids

Several ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes fromD. busckiiwere cloned and characterized. The prominent repeat classes have lengths of 12·8 and 13·6 kb and lack 28S introns. rRNA genes were cloned containing 28S insertions which exhibit heterogeneity in size and sequence. The non-transcribed spacer (NTS) contains two regions composed of different repeated sequences that exhibit pronounced instability in HB 101. NTS region II, centrally located within the NTS, contains predominately 11 or 16HincII generated 160 bp repeats. NTS region III, next to the 18S gene, contains repeats that are variable in number, and are either heterogeneous in length or are dispersed within unique sequences. The organization and composition of the rRNA gene NTS ofD. busckiiis different in comparison to the NTSs of other drosophilids. In addition, the pronounced instability of two different NTS regions is unique in comparison to all other cloned rRNA genes.

Additional RNA polymerase I initiation site within the nontranscribed spacer region of the rat rRNA gene

We identified and characterized an additional promoter within the nontranscribed spacer (NTS) of the rat ribosomal gene repeat that is capable of supporting initiation of transcription by RNA polymerase I in vitro. Within this promoter there is a sequence of 13 nucleotides which is 100% homologous to nucleotides -18 to -6 (+1 being the first nucleotide of 45S rRNA) of the major promoter of 45S pre-rRNA and is located between nucleotides -731 and -719. To identify the exact location of the upstream initiation site, the RNA synthesized in vitro from this new promoter was gel isolated and subjected to fingerprint analysis, Southern hybridization, and reverse transcriptase elongation. Based on these analyses, the in vitro-synthesized RNA initiates with an A at nucleotide -713. When compared individually, the upstream promoter was transcribed ninefold less efficiently than the major promoter. When templates which contain both promoters on the same piece of DNA were transcribed, the major promoter was at least 50-fold more efficient.

A 12-base-pair sequence is an essential element of the ribosomal gene terminator in Xenopus laevis

rRNA transcription in Xenopus laevis terminates near a 7-base-pair (bp) conserved sequence (T3 box) located 200 bp upstream of the site of transcription initiation for the adjacent gene promoter. We present evidence here that a 12-bp element containing the T3 box is an essential part of the terminator. Using an oocyte injection assay, we found that the 12-bp element (but not the T3 box alone) severely reduced the amount of RNA detectable at sites downstream from itself and that the T3 box within the 12-bp element was required to specify the formation of correct 3' ends. This requirement for the 12-bp element was also seen in pulse-label experiments by using a homogenate of oocyte nuclei, but the present data did not allow us to determine the exact mechanism by which the 12-bp element acts. Removal of the T3 region from its normal location allowed a significant amount of readthrough transcripts to accumulate, indicating that additional sequences may be required for complete terminator function.

In vivo transcription from multiple spacer rRNA gene promoters during early development and evolution of the intergenic spacer in the brine shrimp Artemia

The control of ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene expression during development can be productively studied by examination of the relationship between promoter structure and function as well as the processing of primary transcripts. Toward this end total cell RNA was extracted from embryos at various stages and probed with cloned rRNA genes using the "dot blot" method. This exercise showed that rRNA gene expression is a stage-specific process and is thus under developmental control. S1 nuclease protection experiments localized fourteen different upstream DNA sites encoding 5'-termini of pre-rRNAs during this synthetic phase of development. There is no indication of any spacer fail-safe terminator function. The S1 approach contributed to the sequencing of several of the sites. Comparative sequence alignments reveal short conserved regions in DNAs corresponding to these sites, which are shown to fall into two structural classes. Sites 3, 4, 6 and 9 are proposed to function in transcription initiation and are found to have the consensus sequence 5'...T-A-T-A-T-Pu-Pu-Pu-G-Pu-Pu-G-T-C-A 3'. Sites 1, 2, 5 and 8 which are proposed to function in 5'-processing have the consensus sequence; 5'...Pu-G-T-Pu-T-T-G 3'. These short sequence conserved regions are hypothesized to serve as recognition signals for proteins within the rDNA transcription initiation complex and for 5'-processing enzymes, respectively. Sequencing of the intergenic spacer region from which a model for spacer evolution is derived shows that tandem ca 600 bp subrepeats explain much of the multiplicity observed within control sites.