Clinical importance of HCV confirmatory testing in blood donors

Performance of second- and third-generation RIBAs for confirmation of third-generation HCV EIA-reactive blood donations. Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study

BACKGROUND

Licensure of an enhanced HCV screening assay (HCV 3.0 EIA) without concurrent licensure of a complementary supplemental assay (i.e., RIBA HCV 3.0 strip immunoblot assay [RIBA-3]) decoupled screening and supplemental testing. In March 1998, the FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) recommended the use of RIBA-3 on RIBA HCV 2.0 strip immunoblot assay (RIBA-2)-indeterminate units screened with HCV EIA 3.0.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The sensitivity of RIBA-2 and RIBA-3 was compared in tests on HCV 3.0 EIA-repeatably reactive (RR) units identified immediately after the implementation of HCV 3.0 EIA screening. Two protocols were evaluated: parallel testing of HCV 3.0 EIA-RR units by RIBA-2 and RIBA-3 and reflex testing of HCV 3.0 EIA-RR and RIBA-3-confirmed-positive units by RIBA-2. All specimens with discordant RIBA-2 and RIBA-3 results and a representative sampling with concordant RIBA results were tested by PCR.

RESULTS

In the parallel testing protocol, 99,777 donations were screened, with 245 HCV 3.0 EIA-RR specimens included in the study. Of 166 RIBA-2-positive samples, 165 tested positive in RIBA-3 (1 sample reacted to the control superoxide dismutase antigen in RIBA-3). Thirty-two (74%) of 43 RIBA-2-indeterminate specimens and 4 (11%) of 36 RIBA-2-negative specimens tested positive in RIBA-3. HCV RNA was identified in 5 (16%) of 32 RIBA-2-indeterminate/RIBA-3-positive donations, as well as in 26 (70%) of 37 concordant RIBA-2/RIBA-3-positive donations. In the reflex testing protocol, 292,459 donations were screened, with 709 HCV 3.0 EIA-RR specimens included in the study. RIBA-3 testing yielded 517 (73%) positive specimens, of which 50 (9.7%) tested indeterminate and 15 (2.9%) tested negative in RIBA-2. Among the RIBA-discordant specimens, 10 (20%) RIBA-2-indeterminate specimens and 1 (7%) RIBA-2-negative specimens tested positive in PCR; in comparison, 60 (77%) of 78 concordant RIBA-2/RIBA-3-positive units tested positive in PCR.

CONCLUSIONS

RIBA-3 is significantly more sensitive than RIBA-2 in testing of HCV 3.0 EIA-screened donations. During the review process of this manuscript, the FDA licensed the RIBA-3 test.

Development of low cost peptide-based anti-hepatitis C virus screening and confirmatory assays: comparison with commercially available tests

Screening and confirmatory low cost reagent tests have been developed for detection of anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV). Assays are based on the use of specific synthetic peptides from several structural and non-structural viral proteins. The efficacy of the screening anti-HCV EIA-Spep assay was compared with both Abbott EIA 2.0 (Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, IL) and Ortho EIA 2.0 (Ortho Diagnostic Systems, Raritan, NJ) anti-HCV detection kits and the confirmatory EIA-Cpep assay was compared with the Abbott Matrix anti-HCV confirmation test. In the EIA-Spep, a pool of 3 peptides was added to each well of a microtiter plate. In EIA-Cpep, each well was separately coated with 1 of 4 peptides and 1 recombinant protein. A total of 867 blood donor samples from Costa Rica tested simultaneously with the 3 screening assays yielded the same specificity and negative predictive values of > or =99.9% and 100%, respectively. A comparative study on voluntary blood donor samples from Honduras, Nicaragua, and El Salvador using the 2 anti-HCV confirmatory assays revealed different patterns that are 46% positive, 24% indeterminate, and 30% negative with the EIA-Cpep assay vs. 31% positive, 48% indeterminate, and 21% negative with the Matrix assay. A study of 71 patient samples from Costa Rica showed a higher correlation between initially reactive samples when analyzed by the Abbott and Ortho kits, than when the assay results were compared between the Abbott and EIA-Spep kits; the latter detected 7 and 15 non-reactive samples, respectively. These results could reflect the use of a similar antigen source for the 2 commercial assays. The presence of HCV RNA in a group of 29 samples analyzed was related to the simultaneous reactivity in all 3 screening assays. None of the discordant samples had detectable levels of HCV RNA. Economic difficulties for health care services in the developing countries of Central America have prevented implementation of routine anti-HCV blood donor screening tests. This is likely to be the primary reason for uncontrolled dissemination of HCV, and the lack of identification of potential high risk groups. Alternative low cost reagents developed locally as described in this article could be a useful tool in the control of HCV spread throughout the developing world.

Look-back of anti-HCV ELISA-positive, HCV-RNA PCR-negative donors and recipients of their blood products

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To establish the infectivity of anti-HCV ELISA-positive, but cDNA-PCR-negative blood components transfused before the introduction of routine anti-HCV blood donor screening, we enrolled recipients of such blood products in a look-back programme.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The blood components were donated by (A) RIBA-2-indeterminate and cDNA-PCR-negative donors, and (B) RIBA-2 and cDNA-PCR-negative donors. The look-back comprised 214 blood products from group A donors and 278 from group B.

RESULTS

Of 211 recipients of group A components, 66 (31.3%) were available for testing. All other recipients could not be traced, had died, or refused collaboration. Of these 66, 3 patients had independent risk factors for HCV infection and were excluded. All remaining 63 recipients were anti-HCV ELISA-negative. Of 274 recipients of group B components, 84 (30.7%) were available for testing. All others could not be traced, had died, or refused collaboration. Of these 84, six patients had an independent risk factor for HCV infection and were excluded. All remaining 78 recipients were anti-HCV ELISA-negative. None of the recipients of blood products from previous donations of anti-HCV ELISA-positive, cDNA-PCR-negative, and RIBA-2-indeterminate or negative donors were HCV-infected.

CONCLUSIONS

Donors and patients with such reactivities in anti-HCV ELISA, RIBA-2, and cDNA-PCR can be assured that they are not infected with HCV. The donors involved can re-enter the donor pool, provided that future donations are anti-HCV ELISA-negative.

Indeterminate results of the second-generation hepatitis C virus (HCV) recombinant immunoblot assay: significance of high-level c22-3 reactivity and influence of HCV genotypes

A second-generation recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA 2.0) is used in the United States to confirm infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) in samples that are anti-HCV (enzyme immunoassay) positive. In some cases, indeterminate results of RIBA 2.0, which are defined as reactivity to a single antigen species or reactivity limited to two proteins derived from the same coding region of the HCV genome, are encountered. This study was performed to establish the significance of indeterminate RIBA 2.0 results in relation to HCV RNA detection, high positivity for the c22-3 band, and the HCV genotype as determined by direct DNA sequencing. Ninety-six samples with indeterminate RIBA 2.0 results were studied. HCV RNA was detected in 21 of 34 (62%) samples with high reactivity to c22-3 and in 8 of 62 (13%) samples with low reactivity to c22-3. The HCV genotype distribution in samples that were RIBA 2.0 indeterminate and HCV RNA positive was significantly different from that in samples of a control group with positive results for both the RIBA 2.0 and HCV PCR. These results suggest that highly positive c22-3 samples are likely to be associated with HCV viremia and that infection with less common HCV genotypes is more commonly associated with indeterminate RIBA 2.0 results.

Prevalence of hepatitis B or C virus infection in patients with fulminant viral hepatitis. An analysis using polymerase chain reaction

BACKGROUND/METHODS

The cause of fulminant hepatitis is still not fully understood. We studied 23 patients with fulminant hepatitis, using polymerase chain reaction to detect hepatitis virus genomes. Tests for HBsAg and IgM anti-HAV and IgM anti-HBc were performed in all patients. Serum samples were stored at -70 degrees C for later analysis of anti-HCV and hepatitis virus genomes such as hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus and hepatitis D virus.

RESULTS

Of 23 patients, 17 (74%) had HBV-DNA and two (9%) had HCV-RNA. No patient was positive for both viruses or positive for HDV-RNA. Serological tests indicated that two patients, negative for HBV-DNA and HCV-RNA, were positive for IgM anti-HAV. In contrast, 8 of 17 (47%) HBV-DNA positive patients were negative for both IgM anti-HBc and HBsAg in conjunction with low levels of viremia. Four patients were positive for anti-HCV, but only one was positive for HCV-RNA. One patient, positive for HCV-RNA, was negative for anti-HCV.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that analysis of hepatitis virus genomes using polymerase chain reaction allows accurate identification of the virus causing fulminant hepatitis.

Hepatitis C virus: epidemiology and genotypes in the north east of England

The epidemiology of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection was studied in an English teaching hospital over an 18 month period. A total of 104 HCV antibody positive patients were referred for further investigation. They were divided into those diagnosed through screening (blood donors and intravenous drug abusers) and those diagnosed for other reasons, and their mean ages, known risk factors for HCV transmission, genotypes, and liver biopsy histology were analysed. Screened patients were significantly younger than the others. No significant difference in age was found between genotypes. Most patients genotyped (69%) were genotype 1. Intravenous drug abusers had a higher proportion of subtype 1a, and patients who acquired HCV through blood transfusion had a higher proportion of subtype 1b. Liver biopsy specimens were scored using a histological activity index for liver inflammation and fibrosis. Patients with subtype 1b had significantly more severe liver disease than other genotypes when the histological activity index scores for fibrosis were analysed (p < 0.05). Liver disease worsened significantly with age according to all three histological activity index scores (portal activity: p < 0.01, acinar activity: p < 0.001, fibrosis: p < 0.0001). Liver disease worsened with increased duration of infection (p < 0.002), and patients who also abused alcohol presented at a significantly younger age (cirrhosis, p < 0.05, hepatocellular carcinoma, p < 0.02).

ELISA for anti-HCV antibody employing a shorter synthetic core region peptide

A new ELISA for anti-HCV antibody was developed employing a shorter synthetic N-terminal peptide, 2-62aa, within the core region of 1-191aa. The basic performance of the assay was comparable to three other second-generation assays using longer HCV core antigens. To evaluate assay performance at the borderline level, 25 samples with indeterminate results were selected from 3000 routine serum samples. Only 5 of the 25 sera were found to be HCV-RNA-positive by a nested PCR assay and with apparent clinical evidence of HCV infection. The results of the new ELISA agreed with those of the PCR-RNA test in 23/25 (kappa statistics 0.75), whereas C22-3 of the RIBA II test using 2-120aa of the core agreed in 9/25 (0.09), the Abbott pHCV-34 EIA test using 1-150aa agreed in 10/25 (-0.12), and a neutralization inhibition assay for Abbott EIA II using 2-120aa agreed in 6/25 (0.02). These results indicate that the UBI CORE ELISA has greatly improved specificity and can be a useful indication of viremia in HCV infection.

Prevalence of hepatitis B and C viruses in healthy Indonesian blood donors

Blood samples were collected from 7572 healthy volunteer blood donors from 21 of the 27 Indonesian provinces, and tested for antibodies to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) using the new second-generation enzyme immunosorbent assay, and also tested for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). We detected anti-HCV in 2.1% of the blood donors. No statistically significant difference was found between males and females or between locations, but there was a statistically significant increasing likelihood of anti-HCV prevalence with increasing age. HBsAg was found in 8.8% of the 3839 tested donors. There was no statistically significant difference between sexes or age groups, but there was a statistically significant higher prevalence in the islands of Sulawesi and eastern Indonesia. Only 7 individuals, from 5 locations, were both anti-HCV and HBsAg positive. Based on responses to a questionnaire, a history of surgery, blood transfusion, intravenous medication, and acupuncture were identified as risk factors for the presence of anti-HCV. No such risk factor was identified for HBsAg prevalence. The combined data suggest separate modes of transmission for the 2 viruses, and indicate the need for continued surveillance for these agents in Indonesian blood banks.

Third-generation hepatitis C virus tests in asymptomatic anti-HCV-positive blood donors

This study evaluated the performance of third-generation anti-HCV assays in blood donors who were positive by second-generation anti-HCV, and assessed any possible relationship between antibody patterns, HCV replication and liver damage. Fifty-two second-generation enzyme immunoassay-positive asymptomatic Italian blood donors were retested for anti-HCV by third-generation enzyme immunoassay and recombinant immunoblot assay (Ortho third-generation enzyme immunoassay, third-generation recombinant immunoblot assay), utilising recombinant C33c and NS5 and synthetic peptide C100 and C22 antigens, and for HCV-RNA by "nested" polymerase chain reaction with 5' region primers. Alanine aminotransferases were tested monthly for 6 months. Two out of 52 second-generation enzyme immunoassay-positive donors were third-generation enzyme immunoassay, third-generation recombinant immunoblot assay and HCV-RNA negative. Among 50 third-generation enzyme immunoassay-positive cases, two had a third-generation enzyme immunoassay optical density < or = 1: one was third-generation recombinant immunoblot assay and HCV-RNA negative, and the other was third-generation recombinant immunoblot assay "indeterminate" and HCV-RNA-positive. The remaining 48 cases had third-generation enzyme immunoassay optical density > 1: six were third-generation recombinant immunoblot assay negative (one HCV-RNA+ve), eight "indeterminate" (two HCV-RNA+ve) and 34 positive (22 HCV-RNA+ve). All "indeterminate" subjects reacted only to C22. HCV-RNA was positive in 22/34 cases with positive third-generation recombinant immunoblot assay (two or more Ags), 3/9 "indeterminate" and 1/11 negative. Alanine amino-transferases were abnormal in 13 cases with positive third-generation recombinant immunoblot assay, one was "indeterminate" and three were negative.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Hepatitis C virus infections in transplant patients: serological and virological investigations

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is transmitted by organs of HCV antibody-positive donors to transplant recipients. This study investigated the serological and virological responses of 14 initially HCV antibody-negative transplant patients who received organs from four HCV antibody-positive donors (A-D) (before donor screening for HCV infection was introduced in 1991). Second generation HCV enzyme immunoassay (Abbott HCV EIA) was used to detect anti-HCV antibody. Recombinant immunoblot (RIBA-2; Chiron Corporation) and Wellcozyme Western blot (Wwb) assays were compared as confirmatory assays of positive EIA results. Reverse transcription (RT) followed by "nested" polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed to detect viral RNA. HCV RNA was only found in the sera of donors B and C, however, transplantation of organs from all donors resulted in infection of all recipients. HCV RNA was found in recipient sera within 30 days after transplant and remained detectable throughout the period of sampling. An anti-HCV antibody response was found in only 6 (of the 14) recipients and only after 300 days. Much longer periods passed before detection of HCV antibody in six recipients. For detection of HCV infection in transplant recipients it is essential that testing for HCV RNA by RT-PCR is carried out.

Transmission of hepatitis C virus by organ transplantation in the United Kingdom

This study employed a second-generation anti-HCV ELISA, and a second-generation recombinant immunoblot assay and hepatitis C virus RNA detection by polymerase chain reaction to investigate the anti-HCV prevalence in 554 British organ donors and the transmission of hepatitis C virus to heart, liver and kidney recipients between 1984 and 1991. Serum samples from six (1.08%) donors were reactive in the second-generation anti-HCV ELISA and four (67%) of these gave positive or indeterminate results in the recombinant immunoblot assay-2. Of the 15 recipients of these organs from hepatitis C virus-confirmed positive/indeterminate donors, 14 (93%) acquired hepatitis C virus infection and seven (47%) had evidence of hepatitis C virus-related liver disease after transplantation and no evidence of blood transfusion-related transmission. Only six of the 15 (40%) recipients had detectable anti-HCV after transplantation, while 12 of 14 (86%) patients tested had hepatitis C virus RNA in their serum detectable by "nested" polymerase chain reaction. These data indicate a very high rate of transmission with a major risk of the development of liver disease. We believe our study supports the testing of all British organ donors for anti-HCV and that organs from anti-HCV-positive patients should not be transplanted unless the recipient has life-threatening disease and there is a donor shortage, when their use may be justified. Since there are time constraints on organ donor testing, which may frequently be done on call during unsocial hours, we would recommend second-generation ELISA as the current screening test of choice.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Significance of highly positive c22-3 "indeterminate" second-generation hepatitis C virus (HCV) recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA) and resolution by third-generation HCV RIBA

Second-generation recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA) is widely used for the validation of anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody detection. The aims of this work were (i) to determine, in terms of liver disease and HCV replication, the significance of a peculiar "indeterminate" second-generation RIBA pattern characterized by the presence of high titers of antibodies directed to c22-3, a protein bearing core epitopes and (ii) to determine whether a more advanced version of the same strip assay, namely a third-generation RIBA, may solve the problem of such indeterminate patterns. Sixty patients for which c22-3 indeterminate second-generation RIBAs were highly positive were studied. Forty-two of them (70%) were immunocompromised. Serum transaminases were increased in 46 cases (77%), and HCV RNA was detected by PCR in 50 cases (83%). Third-generation RIBA remained highly positive c22 indeterminate for 9 patients (15%) but was positive for 51 (85%), mostly because of increased sensitivity for the detection of both anti-c100 and anti-c33c antibodies. These results suggest that third-generation RIBA may achieve resolution of most of these cases but that highly positive c22 indeterminate third-generation RIBA may persist when used with some patients with very low titers of anti-HCV nonstructural protein antibodies.

Liver disease in anti-hepatitis C virus-positive Norwegian blood donors

In a prospective study of 16,756 consecutive blood donors, we found 54 donors (0.3%) to be anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive by a first-generation enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. After retesting, 18 donors were confirmed positive or indeterminate by a second-generation recombinant immunoblot assay. Sixteen of these donors were found positive by a second-generation enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and 15 of these were positive by HCV polymerase chain reaction with two primer sets. Nine donors (50%) had a history of drug abuse. In 15 donors found positive by a second-generation enzyme-linked immunoblot assay liver biopsy specimens were taken after at least 6 months' follow-up. In all except one hepatitis C RNA-negative donor, histologic abnormalities were observed, even when alanine aminotransferase (ALAT) levels were continuously normal or only moderately elevated. The abnormalities were less pronounced in these donors (n = 5) than in donors with ALAT levels increased more than twice the upper normal limit (p < 0.05). In conclusion, we found the proportion of previous drug abusers in anti-HCV-positive blood donors to be high. We confirm that the presence of anti-HCV (second generation) usually, and HCV-RNA always, seems to indicate ongoing infection--also when ALAT levels are normal. Our study further suggests that low-activity hepatitis, evaluated by ALAT levels, may indicate a milder disease.

Prevalence of antibody to hepatitis C virus (HCV) in HIV-1-infected patients (nice SEROCO cohort)

The prevalence of antibody to hepatitis C virus (HCV) in a cohort of 272 HIV-infected patients was assessed by means of 4 anti-HCV assays: a 1st generation and a neutralization test, a 2nd generation test, and a confirmatory test, the dot-blot Matrix HCV immunoassay. The cohort included, as a single risk factor, 35.7% intravenous drug users (IVDUs), 25% homosexual men, 30.1% heterosexual individuals, 5.9% transfused patients, 0.7% occupational infections, and 2.6% patients with unknown infection source, and was studied on entry and in samples collected for up to 36 months. Results showed that on entry (i) sera of 83 out of 272 members of the cohort were positive by the HCV 1st generation EIA (30.5%); 70 were confirmed by the neutralization test (84.3%); (ii) 115 of the cohort were reactive with the 2nd generation HCV EIA (41.3%); (iii) with the dot-blot immunoassay 99 (86.1%) of the cohort were confirmed and 16 remained indeterminate. The overall confirmed HCV antibody-positive rate in these 272 patients was 36.4%. Antibody to HCV was detected in 78.3% of IVDUs, 18.3% of heterosexual individuals, 31.2% of transfused patients, and only 2.9% of homosexual men. The 36-month follow-up of this cohort revealed that 4/145 patients became anti-HCV positive by second generation assay. Hepatitis B markers were frequently associated with HCV in IVDUs (71.1%) but infrequently in heterosexual (8.5%) or homosexual (1.5%) individuals. Our results suggest that HCV 2nd generation EIA used in combination with the semiautomated dot-blot assay as a confirmatory test improves the specificity and sensitivity for HCV antibody detection.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Confirmation of hepatitis C virus antibody in blood donors

Of 103,203 donations collected in Scotland and Northern Ireland over a 3-month period and screened for HCV antibody by Ortho or Abbott second-generation ELISAs, 340 were found repeatedly reactive. Supplementary testing with RIBA-2 resulted in 77 being classified as positive, 130 as indeterminate, and 133 as negative. PCR analysis of the positives and indeterminates indicated viraemia in 65 (84%) of the positives and 7 (5.5%) of the indeterminates. To determine if PCR analysis could be eliminated or reduced by further serological testing, all RIBA-2 positives and indeterminates were tested by UBI and Wellcozyme ELISAs and Innolia and RIBA-3 immunoblots. All RIBA-2 positives with bands to more than 1 gene product were detected in all 4 systems, but > 60% of RIBA-2 indeterminates were negative in those tests that contain either recombinant antigens or synthetic peptides derived independently from those used by Ortho/Abbott tests. A comparison of data from the 79 reactive with the core (c22) region revealed only 16 samples reactive in all 4 systems as well as Ortho and Abbott. These 16 included all 6 of the PCR positives in the 79 c22 indeterminate samples. ELISAs and immunoblots using independently derived antigens can offer a useful method of screening out nonspecific reactions in Ortho or Abbott ELISAs, hence reducing the need for PCR testing. Some caution is required as all such tests do not contain identical mixes of antigenic material.

Detection of hepatitis C virus by polym erase chain reaction in haemodialysed patients in relationship to anti-HCV status

HCV RNA was determined by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in 41 haemodialysed patients with a known anti-HCV status (ELISA and RIBA-2) and a monthly alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level determination. No histological examination of the liver tissue was available. Four samples from each patient were collected at 6 month intervals for 18 months. Seven patients negative for anti-HCV during the entire follow-up gave negative PCR results on the four samples. Two patients who were anti-HCV-negative upon entry into the study seroconverted to HCV during follow-up. HCV RNA was detected during the acute phase of hepatitis. HCV RNA was no longer detectable after antiviral therapy was administered to one patient. Out of 27 anti-HCV-positive patients, 24 had persistent viraemia, 2 had transient viraemia (1 sample PCR-negative and 3 samples PCR-positive) and 1 was PCR-negative on the 4 samples. Thirteen of the 26 viraemic patients had a normal ALT level during the preceding 3 years. Three patients with a C22-3 band alone by RIBA-2 were negative by PCR, whereas two patients with a C33-c band alone were PCR-positive on the four samples. These results suggest that HCV viraemia was strongly associated with anti-HCV in haemodialysed patients with or without biological hepatitis.