Analysis of prostatic tumor cultures using fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH)

Tissue Imprints or Primary Cultures

Touch preparations or imprints have been extensively used in cytogenetics to avoid primary cultures, especially when studying solid tumors which are hard to grow in vitro. Interphase nuclei studies by FISH have been validated in several sample types; however, to our knowledge, a comparison between both methods when studying clonality has not yet been published. We have performed a comparative FISH study between touch preparations and cultured cells to assess their reliability when studying the aneuploidy of chromosome Y in mosaicism. Our results in 23 samples indicate that aneuploidy of chromosome Y assessed in cells from tissue cultures versus cells obtained from touch preparations from seminal vesicles of patients with prostate cancer is not comparable. The percentage of aneuploid cells is higher in cultured cells. Attention, therefore, must be paid not to overestimating or underestimating the number of aneuploid cells detected when using interphase FISH studies, especially in solid tumors where clonality is very frequent. Also, according to our results, it is reasonable to extrapolate that when performing interphase nuclei studies in paraffin sections or tissue microarray, and therefore underestimations of aneuploidy could be reported. This might be of special relevance if the aneuploidy detected correlates with the tumor progression or might be used as a prognostic factor.

Are primary cultures realistic models of prostate cancer?

Primary cultures fill a unique niche among the repertoire of in vitro model systems available to investigate the biology of the normal and malignant human prostate. This review summarizes some of the properties of primary cultures, with special emphasis on two questions: are primary cultures from adenocarcinomas really comprised of cancer rather than normal cells, and do primary cultures faithfully retain characteristics of cells of origin?

Use of interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization in prostate needle biopsy specimens with isolated high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia as a predictor of prostate adenocarcinoma on follow-up biopsy

Isolated high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) on needle biopsy confers an increased risk of prostate carcinoma (CaP) on follow-up biopsy. The aim of this study is to determine whether paraffin-section fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) of specific chromosome/oncogene copy number abnormalities (CNAs) in biopsy specimens with isolated HGPIN increases the predictive value for CaP on repeat biopsy. Cases were divided into 3 groups: controls (n=8) and sextant biopsy specimens with isolated HGPIN without CaP (group A; n=11) and with CaP (group B; n=14) on follow-up biopsy. Dual-color FISH assessing c-myc, HER-2/neu, chromosome region 7q31 (D7S486), and corresponding chromosome centromeres was performed. An amplification ratio (AR) for each marker centromere was derived for each biopsy specimen, with AR ranges designated as no/low, low-intermediate, and high. Also calculated for each marker were the percentage of cells with marker amplification, hyperdiploidy, and monosomy. A composite score for each biopsy specimen was calculated based on these parameters, with a possible range of 0 to 15. The specific chromosomal oncogene CNAs were as follows: for chromosome 7/7q31, 2 of 11 (18%) in group A and 6 of 14 (43%) in group B; for chromosome 8/c-myc, 4 of 11 (36%) in group A and 9 of 13 (69%) in group B; and for chromosome 17/HER-2/neu, 10 of 10 (100%) in group A and 13 of 14 (93%) in group B. The mean composite score was 0 for controls, 2.5 for group A, and 4.7 for group B. Composite scores > or =4 for the 3 groups were 0 of 9 (0%) for controls, 1 of 11 (12%) for group A, and 8 of 14 (57%) for group B. These differences were statistically significant (P=0.015). One group A patient with a high composite score (6) had atypical small glands on follow-up biopsy at <1 year. Chromosome/oncogene CNAs are uncommon in control patients, occurring with increasing frequency and magnitude in patients with isolated HGPIN without and with follow-up CaP. Chromosome/oncogene CNAs in HGPIN are mostly of the low to intermediate level and display intercellular heterogeneity. HER-2/neu amplification is common in HGPIN with and without follow-up CaP. Chromosome 7 and 8 aneusomy and 7q31 and c-myc amplification are greater in HGPIN with follow-up CaP. Patients with isolated HGPIN and high composite score without follow-up CaP are uncommon; these patients may have a small, unsampled CaP. Although patients with HGPIN without CaP are more likely to have a low composite score, a subset of patients with follow-up CaP have low composite score, suggesting (1) mutational pathways independent of chromosomes 7, 8, and 17 and HER-2/neu, c-myc, and chromosome region 7q31 CNAs; (2) CaP derived from an independent, unsampled focus of HGPIN; or (3) CaP not derived from HGPIN.

Primary culture model of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma activity in prostate cancer cells

BRL 49653 (rosiglitazone) is a thiazolidinedione anti-diabetic drug that activates the nuclear receptor, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma). Pilot clinical trials have shown evidence of therapeutic activity of PPARgamma agonists against prostate cancer. To more effectively use PPARgamma ligands to treat this common and generally chemo-resistant type of cancer, it will be necessary to better understand the nature of PPARgamma activity in prostate cancer cells. Tumor suppressor effects of activation of PPARgamma may include suppression of growth and/or induction of differentiation or apoptosis. We investigated responses of primary cultures of human prostatic cancer cells to BRL 49653. PPARgamma was expressed in all of the cell strains examined. BRL 49653 caused dose- and time-dependent growth inhibition that was associated with increased expression of the transcription repressor, transforming growth factor beta-stimulated clone 22 (TSC-22), and markedly increased expression of the secretory differentiation-associated gene adipophilin. Adipocyte-type fatty acid binding protein (aFABP), neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), glycerol kinase (GyK), and beta-catenin, which are regulated by PPARgamma ligands in certain other types of cells, were not regulated by BRL 49653 in prostate cells. Upregulation of adipophilin coincided with morphological changes and the appearance of cytoplasmic vacuoles with ultrastructural features of secondary lysosomes. These results extend previous studies with established cancer cell lines and show that PPARgamma agonists can inhibit proliferation and modulate expression of secretory-associated genes in primary cultures of prostate cancer cells, further warranting consideration of these agents as pro-differentiating chemotherapeutic or chemoprevention agents for the treatment of prostate cancer.

Molecular cytogenetics of prostate cancer

Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy among men in Western industrialized countries. The molecular pathogenesis of the disease is poorly known. Over the past 10 years, chromosomal aberrations in prostate cancer have been studied with several techniques, such as loss of heterozygosity (LOH), classical cytogenetics, and molecular cytogenetics, namely with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). These analyses, especially those performed by CGH, have enabled the distinction of the predominant chromosomal regions of involvement in prostate cancer. Studies have shown that the most common chromosomal alterations in prostate cancer are losses at 1p, 6q, 8p, 10q, 13q, 16q, and 18q and gains at 1q, 2p, 7, 8q, 18q, and Xq. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has been used to identify the target genes for some of these chromosomal alterations. For example, amplifications of AR (at Xq12), MYC (8q24), and EIF3S3 (8q23) have been found in a large fraction of hormone-refractory prostate cancer by FISH. However, many of the critical oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes located in the altered chromosomal regions have not yet been identified.

LNCaP progression model of human prostate cancer: androgen-independence and osseous metastasis

BACKGROUND

Clinically, the lethal phenotypes of human prostate cancer are characterized by their progression to androgen-independence and their propensity to form osseous metastases. We reported previously on the establishment of androgen-independent (AI) human prostate cancer cell lines derived from androgen-dependent (AD) LNCaP cells, with androgen independence defined as the capability of prostate cancer cells to grow in castrated hosts. One of the sublines, C4-2, was found to be AI, highly tumorigenic, and metastatic, having a proclivity for metastasis to the bone.

METHODS

We established the AI and bone metastatic cell sublines B2, B3, B4, and B5 from the parental C4-2 subline, using a previously established coinoculating procedure. We determined the biologic behavior of the parental and derivative LNCaP sublines in vivo and in vitro, as well as their molecular and cytogenetic characteristics.

RESULTS

Unlike other human prostate cancer models, the LNCaP progression model shares remarkable similarities with human prostate cancer. We observed a comparable pattern of metastasis from the primary to the lymph node and to the axial skeleton, with a predominant phenotype of osteoblastic reaction; 25-37.5% of the animals developed paraplegia. Cytogenetic and biochemical characterizations of LNCaP sublines also indicate close similarities between human prostate cancer and the LNCaP progression model. Additional chromosomal changes were detected in B2-B5 sublines derived from C4-2 bone metastases. These LNCaP sublines were found to grow faster under anchorage-dependent but not -independent conditions. The in vitro invasion and in vivo metastatic potential of these LNCaP sublines surprisingly correlated with anchorage-dependent and not -independent growth. The derivative LNCaP sublines when cultured in vitro produced a substantially higher (20-30-fold) amount of basal steady-state concentrations of PSA than that of the parental LNCaP cells. PSA production was high initially, but was markedly reduced when the derivative cell lines were inoculated and allowed to grow long-term in vivo for the establishment of tumors and metastasis, suggesting that unknown host factors derived either from the prostate or the bone can effectively downregulate PSA expression by prostate tumor epithelium.

CONCLUSIONS

The LNCaP model of human prostate cancer progression will help improve our understanding of the mechanisms of androgen-independence and osseous metastasis, and tumor-host determinants of PSA expression.

Allelic loss at chromosome band 6q14 correlates with favorable prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma

Cytogenetic and molecular studies have frequently shown chromosome 6q deletions in non-Hodgkin lymphoma and several human cancers. There have been few studies concerning chromosome 6q deletion in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and most of these studies have focused on region 6q26-27. We previously described frequent allelic loss at 6q14 in HCC. As a step toward narrowing the scope of search for tumor suppressor genes, we used a series of yeast artificial chromosome clones that map to the long arm of chromosome 6 (6q14-6q22) by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to define the minimal common region of allelic loss in 25 cases of HCC. Altogether, 12 tumors had allelic loss on 6q (48%). Eleven of the 12 tumors had polysomy of chromosome 6 with evident intratumor cytogenetic heterogeneity. The minimal common region of allelic loss lies within a 2-cM region at 6q14, flanked by D6S458 (849_d_8) and D6S275 (911_a_3). Clinicopathologic correlation between the 12 patients with allelic loss at 6q and the 13 patients without allelic loss showed no significant differences in any basic characteristics except survival. Patients with allelic loss at 6q had a much longer median survival time than those without allelic loss (50 months vs. 11 months, P = 0.0019). Only 5 of the 25 HCC patients were still alive at the time of this study, and all of them had allelic loss at 6q, which is also statistically significant (P = 0.037, alive vs. dead). The association of allelic loss at 6q with polysomy implies that this may be a progression-associated event in HCC. The correlation of allelic loss at 6q with long survival suggests a complex mechanism of tumorigenesis in HCC and is worthy of further investigation.

Chromosomal basis of adenocarcinoma of the prostate

Prostate cancer is the most frequent malignancy and the second leading cause of cancer deaths among males in the Western world. The clinical course of the disease is highly complex, and genetic factors underlying tumorigenesis are poorly understood. The challenge that lies ahead is to identify the important gene(s) that causes adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Chromosomal findings by cytogenetic and molecular methods, including Southern blotting, microsatellite analysis, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and comparative genomic hybridization, revealed a high frequency of chromosomal aberrations of heterogeneous nature, including: -1, +1, -1q, +4, -6q, -7, +7, -8, -8p, -8q, +i(8q), -9, -9p, -10, +10, +11, -12, -13q, -16, -16q, +16, -17, +17, +17q, -18, +18, -18q, +19p, +20q, +X, -Xq, -Y, and +Y. Specific chromosomal regions of alterations were 1q24-25, 2cen-q31, 5cen-q23.3, 6q14-23.2, 7q22-q31, 8p12-21, 8p22, 8q24-qter, 10q22.1, 10q23-25, 11p11.2, 16q24, 17p13.1, 18q12.2, and Xq11-12. Recently, a predisposing gene for early onset has been localized on 1q42.2-43. The losses of heterozygosity at specific chromosomal loci from chromosomes 5q, 6q, 7q, 8p, 8q, 10q, 13q, 16q, 17p, 17q, and 18q are generally correlated with poor prognosis in advanced tumor stage. In addition, an abnormal function of known tumor suppressor genes from these regions have been observed in prostate cancer. Although, the amplification of the androgen receptor gene at Xq11-13 and HER-2/neu gene at 17q11.2-q12 are novel findings, no single gene has been implicated in harboring prostate cancer. Frequent inactivation of PTEN/MMAC1 tumor suppressor gene at 10q23, MXI-1 at 10q25, KAI-1 at 11p11.2, Rb at 13q14.2, and p53 at 17p13.1 and deregulation of c-myc oncogene at 8q24 have recently been the subject of intense scrutiny and debate.

Chromosomal clues to the development of prostate tumors

BACKGROUND

Cytogenetic, molecular cytogenetic, and molecular studies of prostate cancer have revealed an enormous amount of data regarding chromosomal loci that are aberrant in prostate tumors.

METHODS

These data have been compared and condensed in this review to determine which chromosomes and chromosome sites have been most frequently reported.

RESULTS

Loss of the Y chromosome, gain of 7, 8, and X, and interstitial deletions on 6q, 7q, 8p, 10q, 13q, 16q, 17q, and 18q are the most prevalent.

CONCLUSIONS

A potential model for genetic control of tumor progression is presented, as are data regarding the evaluation of a new series of tumors.

A new serial transfer explant cell culture system for human prostatic cancer tissues preventing selection toward diploid cells

An improved explant cell culture technique to avoid selection of prostatic adenocarcinoma cells toward diploid cells is described. This method is based on 1) histologically characterized tissue explants, 2) the use of polyethylenteraphthalate (PET) membranes as growth surface, which are part of special inserts in six-well-plates to allow 3) cocultivation with heterologous fibroblasts, and 4) coating of the membranes with elements of the extracellular matrix. The main characteristic of this particular approach is the serial transfer of the tissue explant from one membrane to the other. Up to ten serial transfer steps could be performed to produce cell monolayers growing out of the same tissue specimen. Using this approach, 21 prostatic carcinoma specimens that were obtained from 13 primary prostatic adenocarcinomas after radical prostatectomy were cultivated. Ploidy of the cells was monitored by fluorescence in situ DNA hybridization using the centromere specific DNA probes pUC1.77, p alpha 7t1, and pY3.4. Interestingly, a high aneuploidy rate of the cell cultures was found with maintainance of aneuploidy in 18 (86%) of the 21 paraffin-embedded cancer tissue specimens with proved aneuploidy. Although a slight decrease of the proportion of aneuploid cells during serial transfer was observed, significant aneuploid cell populations were retained up to a maximum of ten transfer steps. These findings indicate that selection toward diploid cells can be prevented by improved cell culture techniques that mimic the in vivo situation.

Genetic predisposition to prostate cancer: possible explanations for ethnic differences in risk

BACKGROUND

It seems unlikely that the large ethnic differences in prostate cancer risk can be explained completely by ethnic differences in diet or other lifestyle characteristics. Instead, the differences may be due to ethnic variation in endogenous factors, such as androgen metabolism or inherited susceptibility.

METHODS

We have reviewed the literature for evidence and support of ethnic variation in genetic susceptibility to prostate cancer as a reason for the ethnic differences in rates.

RESULTS

We distinguish two types of ethnic variation: 1) variation in the prevalence of certain alleles of specific genes that confer modestly increased risk. Such variation might be reflected in ethnic differences in serum levels of androgens, their metabolites, or indicators of metabolism in the prostate; 2) variation in the prevalence of rare germline mutations conferring substantially increased risk. Such variation would be reflected in ethnic differences in familial aggregation of prostate cancer. We discuss the evidence in support of each of these two possibilities.

CONCLUSIONS

Ethnic variation in polymorphic alleles of genes associated with modest fluctuations in risk could explain a large proportion of the ethnic difference in cancer risk. In contrast, rare mutations associated with substantially increased risk are likely to account for a smaller fraction of these differences.

Cytogenetic studies in prostate cancer: are we making progress?

Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed male malignancy in western countries. Recent work in cell biology and molecular cytogenetics has led to a large amount of data on chromosomal abnormalities in prostatic tumors. A highlight of the literature describing both classical and molecular cytogenetic studies of prostate cancer is presented. By conventional cytogenetics, predominant changes included gain of chromosome 7, loss of Y, deletions of 7q and 10q, and the appearance of double minutes. Using fluorescence in situ hybridization, predominant changes included gains of chromosomes 1, 7, 8, 8q sequences, 17, X and Y, and loss of chromosomes 1, 7, 8, 8p sequences, 10, 10q, 16q and 17q sequences, 17 and Y. Newly defined sites by comparative genomic hybridization included loss of genetic material on 2q, 5q, 6q, 9q, 13q, 15q, 17p, and 18q, and gains at 1q, 2p, 3q, 7q, 9q, 11p, 16p, 20, 22, and X. These data indicate that multiple non-random genomic sites are involved in prostate tumorigenesis. This wide and relatively recent gain of information is likely to provide key clues to the biologic basis of this disease.

Combined cytogenetic and molecular genetic analyses of fifty-nine untreated human prostate carcinomas

G-banding analyses and molecular genetic investigations (fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) studies) were performed in 59 tumor and nontumorous samples of human prostate carcinoma. Clonal chromosome aberrations were detected in 16 tumors of which nine were poorly differentiated (G3) and 11 in an advanced stage (pT3). Six cases showed numerical chromosome aberrations. The most common numerical aberrations were trisomy 7 and loss of the Y chromosome each present in three tumors. Clonal structural aberrations were detected in 12 tumors. Deletions could be observed in two cases affecting chromosome 6q23 and in two cases affecting chromosomal region 16q. A structural variant of the pericentromeric heterochromatin of chromosome 9 became apparent in six cases. The Y chromosome was involved in clonal translocations in two cases, additionally an inversion occurred on chromosome 19 in one case. All clonal chromosomal changes were found exclusively in the tumor sample. For an analysis of the pericentromeric heterochromatin of chromosome 9, FISH using a chromosome 9-specific sat III DNA probe was carried out on metaphase preparations of tumor and nontumorous tissues of two cases showing var(9)(qh). The FISH data suggest a deletion in the pericentromeric heterochromatin. Loss of heterozygosity studies on chromosomal regions 10q and 16q were carried out because both chromosomes were frequently affected by nonclonal structural aberrations. Loss of heterozygosity could be verified in 11 cases.

Genotypic characterization of a primary mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the parotid gland by cytogenetic, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and DNA ploidy analysis

We present a case of mucoepidermoid carcinoma with t(3;12)(q24;p13) and polysomy X by cytogenetic and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) techniques. Flow cytometric DNA analysis of the primary tumor showed DNA aneuploidy and analysis of cultured tumor cells showed DNA diploidy indicating restricted growth of the diploid tumor cells in short-term tissue culture. Interphase cytogenetic analysis of chromosomes 1, 3, 6-12, 16-18, and X in the primary tumor showed polysomy 1, 9, 18, and X, monosomy 8 and 17, and disomy 3, 6, 7, 10-12, and 16. Except for chromosome X, other numerical chromosomal abnormalities were not detected by conventional cytogenetic analysis. Our combined approach allowed for better characterization of the genotypic features of this neoplasm.

Selection toward diploid cells in prostatic carcinoma derived cell cultures

For elucidation of the growth-regulatory mechanisms in prostatic carcinoma, in vitro investigations on prostatic cell cultures are required. However, one major problem of cell culturing is the selection of particular cell types such that the cell lines representing only some of the features as compared with the tumor of origin. We studied the chromosomal composition of 20 prostatic tissue-derived cell cultures and 12 original (fresh) tissue specimens that were obtained from 13 patients with prostatic adenocarcinoma. Using fluorescence in situ DNA hybridization (FISH), evident clonal abnormalities were detected in 78% of the fresh cancer samples and in 47% of the cultured cancer samples. Of the seven cases revealing clonal abnormalities in the fresh cancer specimen, aneuploidy was detected in only two samples after cell culturing at the earliest passage studied. The aneuploid cell populations in the cultured samples were all lost during progressive subcultivation (after passage 4). Interestingly, by performing FISH on cytogenetic preparations aneuploidy was confined to the interphases, with the metaphases being found to be diploid. This finding indicates that the aneuploid cells have a proliferation disadvantage in cell culture resulting in an overgrowth of diploid cells.

Cytogenetic abnormalities are frequent in uncultured prostate cancer cells

Despite attempts by several laboratories to identify consistent chromosome abnormalities in cancer of the prostate, relatively few clonal changes have been found. We compared analysis of metaphases from uncultured specimens of primary prostate cancer (direct preparations) with those obtained from short-term culture using various media. While the number of metaphases in uncultured specimens was low, and chromosome morphology fair to poor, structural chromosome changes could be identified as clonal in 5 of 14 specimens (36%). In contrast, while clonal abnormalities were found in 20 of 61 (33%) specimens analyzed after short-term culture, these abnormalities were predominantly numerical and simple structural changes. Two tumors metastatic to lymph nodes were studied using direct preparations; both were near tetraploid, with multiple structural abnormalities, including isochromosome 8q in both and del(8)(p21) in one. Cytogenetic analyses of metastatic prostate tumors have been very limited, and these data suggest that formation of an i(8q) may be the mechanism by which loss of heterozygosity of 8p, reported frequently in molecular analyses, occurs. Our findings indicate that prostate cancers, like most solid tumors, do have clonal chromosome abnormalities that are frequently complex, but the method that reproducibly yields representative karyotypes from this particular tumor remains to be identified.

Familial prostatic adenocarcinoma in the A.U.S.L territory of Imola

From 1987 to 1992, over 6,000 men aged between 50 and 79 years underwent mass screening for early diagnosis of prostatic carcinoma. They were also given an “epidemiological” questionnaire drawn up by a Urologist, which included information regarding civil status, fertility, working conditions, eating and smoking habits as well as tumours in the family. With regard to the latter, it appeared that 11% of patients with cancer have a positive family history against 2.2% in healthy men and 1.8% in individuals with benign prostatic hypertrophy. In order to investigate this aspect, 46 next of kin (brothers, sons) of patients with prostatic carcinoma (mean age 60 years, range 44–76) were enrolled in the study and subjected to DRE, TRUS and PSA assay. Patients with an alteration of one or more of the above-mentioned parameters (6 patients) underwent an echoguided biopsy (of nodule or normal). Only one (aged 52 years, PSA 12.1, DRE negative, TRUS small hypoechogenic area, prostatic volume 80 cc) had grade 2 PIN. Prostatectomy performed on the patient in another hospital showed that he had fibromyo-glandular hyperplasia. Results are discussed and compared with those reported in literature.

Loss of chromosome 17 loci in prostate cancer detected by polymerase chain reaction quantitation of allelic markers

Using a polymerase chain reaction/microsatellite marker system, we demonstrated that 6 of 22 (27%) clinical stage B (early) primary prostate tumors showed loss of heterozygosity at one or more of five loci on chromosome 17. The sensitivity of this study was increased by use of a PhosphorImager and statistical analysis of replicate tumor-normal DNA pairs. Two patients showed tumor-specific interstitial loss at a locus in close proximity to the familial breast cancer gene BRCA1. These findings suggest that genes on the proximal long arm of chromosome 17 play a pivotal role in the early development of at least a subset of prostatic tumors.

Use of fluorescence in situ hybridization to detect loss of chromosome 10 in astrocytomas

Models describing progression in the genetic derangement of glial tumors have shown loss of chromosome 10 to occur most frequently in high-grade lesions, suggesting that identification of this loss may be prognostically significant. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis may be a valuable adjunct to histological grading if it can accurately detect this loss. In this paper, the authors correlate results obtained from FISH, cytogenetic, molecular genetic, and flow cytometric analyses of a series of 39 brain specimens, including seven normal, two gliotic, and 30 neoplastic (one Grade II, one Grade III, and 28 Grade IV astrocytoma) specimens. Contiguous section of freshly resected surgical tissue were submitted for tissue culturing (karyotype) and touch preparation (FISH), snap-frozen (molecular genetic), or paraffin-embedded (histology and flow cytometry). Centromere-specific probes for chromosomes 10 and 12 were used for FISH analysis, and 19 restriction fragment length polymorphisms (two p-arm and 17 q-arm) and four microsatellite sequence polymorphisms (three p-arm and one q-arm) were used for molecular genetic analysis of chromosome 10. Findings showed FISH and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) analyses to be concordant in 33 of 38 specimens (sensitivity 94%, specificity 81%), with one specimen indeterminate on LOH analysis. Both FISH and LOH analyses were more sensitive at detecting chromosome 10 loss than conventional cytogenetic (karyotype) analysis. The authors conclude that FISH is a sensitive test for detecting chromosome 10 loss and ploidy in astrocytic tumors.

Loss and gain of chromosomes 1, 18, and Y in prostate cancer

Nuclear suspensions of 42 prostate carcinoma specimens obtained at surgery were used to investigate loss and gain chromosomes 1, 18, and Y by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with centromere-specific probes. The outcome of FISH analysis was correlated with clinical parameters and the relationship between DNA-FCM (ploidy at cellular level) and FISH (ploidy of individual chromosomes) was assessed. Significant loss of chromosomes 1 and 18 was infrequent (respectively, three and five cases), but 53% of the tested specimens showed loss of Y. Loss was not correlated with DNA ploidy. Significant gain occurred in 36% (chromosome 1), 63% (chromosome 18), and 28% (Y) of the specimens. Gain of chromosome 18 was shown in DNA diploid (7/14) and aneuploid tumors (18/26), while gain of chromosomes 1 and Y was nearly restricted to DNA aneuploid specimens. Significant unbalance between these chromosomes occurred in 11 cases. Most cases which had significant gain of chromosome 1 or 18 showed trisomic as well as tetrasomic cells. Simultaneous loss of some and gain of other investigated chromosomes is suggestive of clonal heterogeneity and/or multiclonality. This was observed in eight tumors. Correlation between DNA-FCM and FISH was best for the Y chromosome. DNA-FCM showed more aberrant histograms with increasing stage and grade of tumors. The presence of numerical aberrations of the investigated chromosomes however, seemed independent of clinical grade or stage.

DNA aneuploidy in prostatic adenocarcinoma: a frequent event as shown by fluorescence in situ DNA hybridization

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using specific DNA probes for chromosomes 1, 7, 10, and Y was performed on 53 prostatic tissue samples obtained from 33 radical prostatectomy specimens and two benign control specimens. The 53 samples from carcinomatous prostates included 33 cancerous and 20 noncancerous samples. Additionally, four metastatic lymph node specimens were examined. Clonal chromosome abnormalities were observed in 78% of the tumors studied. They were detected in a higher proportion in stage pT2 and pT3 tumors (86% and 88%, respectively) compared with stage pT1 tumors (25%). No stage pT4 tumor was analyzed. There was evidence of remarkable focal intratumoral heterogeneity documented by the study of two samples from the same tumor in three of six cases. Comparing FISH determined ploidy patterns with DNA flow cytometry (FCM) in 22 samples, FISH showed aneuploidy whereas FCM showed none.

Aneusomy of chromosomes 7 and 17 detected by FISH in prostate cancer and the effects of selection in vitro

Twenty prostate tumor specimens, obtained from radical prostatectomies, and two lymph node metastases were examined by classical and molecular cytogenetic methods. A sample from each tumor was analyzed histologically and used for touch preparations. Adjacent samples were used for preparation of single-cell suspensions before cell culture (DirFISH) and for establishing cell cultures, which were subsequently harvested for classical G-banding analysis. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed on touch preparations, DirFISH, and cells obtained from tissue culture. Biotinylated pericentromeric probes for chromosomes 7 and 17, in addition to a digoxigenin-labeled X-chromosome probe, were used in a dual-color FISH assay. The results indicated that, in uncultured tumor cells, chromosome 17 was lost in 55% of specimens, chromosome 7 was gained in 16% of specimens, and 9% of specimens showed large tetraploid populations. After cell culture, 23% of specimens showed loss of chromosome 17, no specimens showed gain of chromosome 7, and no tetraploid populations were present. This study suggests that loss of chromosome 17 may play an important role in the development of prostate cancer, and that genetic changes observed after selection in vitro may not represent those in the original tumor.

Genetic alterations in localized prostate cancer: identification of a common region of deletion on chromosome arm 18q

Accumulation of mutations in oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes transforms a normal cell into a malignant cell by allowing it to escape from normal control of growth. In prostate tumorigenesis, the current model envisages specific mutations of the TP53 tumor suppressor gene and loss of loci, detected by loss of heterozygosity (LOH), on chromosome arms 8p, 10q, 16q, and 18q. In order to determine if alterations frequently found in other adenocarcinomas (breast, ovarian, gastric, colorectal), including losses of genetic material from chromosome arms 1p, 3p, 7q, 8p, 11p, 17p, 17q, and 18q, are also involved in prostate cancer, we examined 20 localized early-stage prostate tumors. We detected no mutations of the TP53 gene. Allelic losses were found from 7q (33%), 8p (50%), 10q (20%), and 18q (33%). Furthermore, as the first step toward isolating tumor suppressor genes on 18q, we used six polymorphic markers and identified a small common deleted region between the chromosome 18 centromere and the D18S19 locus.

Chromosomal aneusomies detected by fluorescent in situ hybridization analysis in clinically localized prostate carcinoma

Fluorescent in situ hybridization using 12 chromosome enumeration probes (for chromosomes 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 17, 18, X and Y) was used to evaluate fresh tumor touch preparations from 40 randomly selected radical prostatectomy specimens. Of the tumors 16 (40%) contained chromosomal aneusomies. Chromosome 8 was aneusomic in 9 tumors (23%). Gain of chromosome 7 was observed in 8 tumors (20%). Chromosome 17 was aneusomic in 4 cases, and chromosomes 10, 11, 12, 18 and Y were each aneusomic twice. Loss of chromosome 9 was observed in 1 tumor. Chromosomes 4, 6, and X were never aneusomic. The percentage of monosomy 17 nuclei was 2 to 4 times the amount noted with the other autosomes for tumor and benign tissue. Computer analysis demonstrated that these signals contained twice the signal density and were significantly different (p < 0.0001) than the single diploid chromosome 17 signals. This result is consistent with homologous pairing of chromosome 17 in benign and neoplastic prostate tissue. Anomalies of chromosomes 8 and/or 7 were present in 14 of the 16 cases (88%) aneusomic by fluorescent in situ hybridization. High grade tumors were more likely to be aneuploid on fluorescent in situ hybridization (p < 0.001). Tumors with chromosome 8 aneusomies were of higher stage (p < 0.05). Fluorescent in situ hybridization is more sensitive than flow cytometry for the detection of aneusomy/aneuploidy. The prognostic relevance of these findings will require further investigation.

Evaluation of 20 archival prostate tumor specimens by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)

Analysis of 20 primary prostatic tumors (local Gleason grades ranging from 1 to 4) was performed on archival material obtained from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded blocks. Alpha satellite probes specific for the pericentric regions of chromosomes 12, 17, X, and Y were used in fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assays for the examination of aneusomies for these chromosomes. Eighty percent of specimens (16/20) showed significant loss of chromosome 17 and 55% (11/20 specimens) also showed significant loss of chromosome 12; all specimens that lost chromosome 12 lost chromosome 17. Gain of the X chromosome was observed in 40% (8/20) of specimens, all but one of which also showed loss of chromosome 17. While the specimens showing gain of the X chromosome may represent polyploid cells, only one specimen also showed significant gain of chromosomes 12 and 17, suggesting that both of these chromosomes may be lost in hyperdiploid prostate cancers. Loss of the Y chromosome was not statistically significant. This study thus indicates that loss of chromosome 17 is a frequent and likely early event in prostatic cancer.

Application of fluorescence in situ hybridisation to chromosome analysis of aged bone marrow smears

AIMS

To evaluate the reliability of fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) in the retrospective cytogenetic assessment of old bone marrow smears stored for periods of up to 20 years.

METHODS

A series of bone marrow smears either Romanowsky stained, or frozen and unstained, and aged from one month to 20 years were hybridised with biotin labelled probes specific for the centromeric regions of human chromosomes X, 6, and 18. Sites of hybridisation were detected with fluoresceinated avidin. One hundred to 400 cells from each preparation were examined and the number of signals observed was recorded.

RESULTS

All smears exhibited signals in most cells examined. In cytogenetically normal cases, an average 67.6% of cells (range 36%-90%) demonstrated the appropriate number of X centromere signals. In those samples known to contain extra chromosomes X, 6, or 18 the presence of cells with the abnormal copy number was clearly detected in each case.

CONCLUSION

When applied in the way described, FISH can give consistent and accurate results with a variety of archival bone marrow smears, including aged prestained material. This will permit retrospective assessment of specific cytogenetic abnormalities in patients with leukaemia using their initial diagnostic slides even where these are several years old.

Frequency and distribution of numerical chromosomal aberrations in prostatic cancer

Prostatic cancer frequently shows striking morphological heterogeneity and multifocal growth. To better understand the relationship between chromosomal changes and pathological characteristics, 31 routinely processed radical prostatectomy specimens were studied for the presence of numerical chromosomal aberrations by in situ hybridization with centromeric nucleic acid probes specific for chromosomes 7, 10, 17, X, and Y. In 24 of the cases preoperative core biopsy specimens were available and were examined with the probe for the X chromosome. In eight of the prostatectomy specimens chromosome numbers consistent with a normal male karyotype were found. Three cases, besides diploid chromosome numbers, showed a focal doubling of hybridization signals, consistent with tetraploidy. The other 20 cases displayed numerical chromosomal aberrations to a various degree. In this group the appearance of numerical chromosomal aberrations often showed considerable local heterogeneity, generally coinciding with morphological dedifferentiation, and was significantly correlated with tumor stage (P = .0004) as well as primary (P = .0068), worst (P = .0002), and combined (P < .0001) Gleason grades, total tumor volume (P = .0448), and the volume of tumor with Gleason grades 4 or 5 (P < .0001). In four of the 24 core biopsy specimens no residual tumor tissue was left for cytogenetic examination. In the remaining 20 biopsy specimens the presence or absence of numerical changes matched the result obtained on the corresponding prostatectomy specimen. We conclude that in prostatic cancer the presence of numerical chromosomal aberrations is associated with advanced disease. Especially in low differentiated tumors local heterogeneity in 2 chromosome numbers can be very marked. It is possible to forecast the presence or absence of numerical chromosomal changes on preoperative core biopsy specimens.

Somatic allelic loss at the DCC, APC, nm23-H1 and p53 tumor suppressor gene loci in human prostatic carcinoma

We present a restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis of 29 benign and 30 malignant prostatic tumors, using polymorphic DNA probes to the putative tumor suppressor genes DCC (Deleted in Colorectal Carcinoma; chromosome 18q21.3), nm23-H1 (17q21.3), APC (Adenomatous Polyposis Coli; 5q21) and p53 (17p13). Six of 23 evaluable cancers (26%) showed loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at DCC; 5 were advanced stage and one was clinically localized (p < 0.05). Mapping 18q deletions, another (advanced) cancer showed LOH at a locus distal to DCC (18q22), but no LOH at DCC. Three of 15 evaluable cancers (20%), all advanced, showed LOH at APC. Three of eight (38%) cancers, of which 2 were advanced, showed LOH at p53. One high grade/stage cancer of 21 (5%) showed LOH at nm23-H1 (and also at DCC). Combining data, allelic losses at either DCC, APC, or p53 genes were seen in 13% of localized cancers, but in 71% of advanced cancers (p < 0.002). Allelic loss involving nm23-H1 is rare in prostatic carcinoma. We suggest that loss of tumor suppressor genes DCC and/or an unidentified gene located distally on chromosome 18q, APC, or p53 may influence progression in prostatic carcinoma.

Numerical abnormalities of chromosome 7 in human prostate cancer detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on paraffin-embedded tissue sections with centromere-specific DNA probes

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using chromosome-specific alpha-satellite DNA probes for chromosomes 7, 8, and 12 was performed on paraffin-embedded tissue sections and touch imprint preparations of 53 cases of human prostate cancer. Subsequent haematoxylin and eosin (H & E) staining of the hybridized tissue sections allowed unambiguous assignment of hybridization signals either to tumour or to non-tumorous parenchyma. Fifty-three cases of human prostate cancer were evaluated for numerical aberrations of chromosome 7. Scoring 200 cells of tumour and non-tumorous parenchyma in each case revealed abnormalities exclusively in tumour parenchyma in 41 cases (77 per cent). Ten of 41 cases (24 per cent) showed trisomy 7, and 15 cases (37 per cent) monosomy 7 or trisomy 7 in combination with monosomy 7, respectively. Sixteen cases (39 per cent) exhibited polysomy 7 in cells of the tumour parenchyma. In the tumour tissue in one case, different polyploid clones (triploid, tetraploid) and polysomy 7 could be identified by double hybridization with chromosome-specific DNA probes for chromosome 7, plus 8 or 12. The indicated numerical aberrations of chromosome 7 were correlated with 78 per cent of advanced pathological stages or poorly differentiated tumours (pT3/4 or G3) of prostate carcinomas. A statistical analysis of the data revealed significant relationships of particular numerical abnormalities of chromosome 7 to different pathological categories (pT, G, pN) of tumour classification. For the T-classification, the frequency of cells carrying polysomy 7 and polysomy 7/+7 increases significantly from pT1 to pT3/4 (P = 0.022).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Demonstration of a rational strategy for human prostate cancer gene therapy

The potential efficacy and clinical feasibility of gene therapy for prostate cancer were tested. Efficacy was tested using the Dunning rat prostate carcinoma model. Rats with anaplastic, hormone refractory prostate cancer treated with irradiated prostate cancer cells genetically engineered to secrete human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) showed longer disease-free survival compared to either untreated control rats or rats receiving prostate cancer cell vaccine mixed with soluble human GM-CSF. A gene modified prostate cancer cell vaccine thus provided effective therapy for anaplastic, hormone refractory prostate cancer in this animal model. An evaluation of the clinical feasibility of gene therapy for human prostate cancer based on these findings was then undertaken. Prostate cancer cells from patients with stage T2 prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy were first transduced with MFG-lacZ, a retroviral vector carrying the beta-galactosidase reporter gene. Efficient gene transfer was achieved in each of 16 consecutive cases (median transduction efficiency 35%, range 12 to 65%). Cotransduction with a drug-selectable gene was not required to achieve high yield of genetically modified cells. Histopathology confirmed malignant origin of these cells and immunofluorescence analysis of cytokeratin 18 expression confirmed prostatic luminal-epithelial phenotype in each case tested. Cell yields (2.5 x 10(8) cells per gram of prostate cancer) were sufficient for potential entry into clinical trials. Autologous human prostate cancer vaccine cells were then transduced with MFG-GM-CSF, and significant human GM-CSF secretion was achieved in each of 10 consecutive cases. Sequential transductions increased GM-CSF secretion in each of 3 cases tested, demonstrating that increased gene dose can be used to escalate desired gene expression in individual patients. These studies show a preclinical basis for proceeding with clinical trials of gene therapy for human prostate cancer.

Trisomy 7: a potential cytogenetic marker of human prostate cancer progression

We used the fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) method to show that chromosome 7 trisomy is associated with the progression of human prostate cancer. Thirty-six specimens including 15 primary prostate carcinomas, 16 metastatic lesions, and 5 normal prostate tissues, as well as 2 prostate carcinoma cell lines of different tumorigenic potential, were examined for chromosome 7 aneuploidy. Our results showed that the androgen-unresponsive tumorigenic cell line PC-3 exhibited a significantly higher ratio of chromosome 7 to total chromosome number than the androgen-responsive nontumorigenic cell line LNCaP (P = 0.001). In prostate specimens, the frequency of trisomy 7 cells was significantly increased (P < 0.05) in the advanced stage tumors (C and DI) but not in the early (B) stage tumors or normal prostatic tissue. Furthermore, metastases showed a higher frequency of trisomy 7 cells than primary tumors (P = 0.005). In 2 patients with paired primary and metastatic tumors, trisomy 7 cells increased from 4-7% in the primary tumors to 42-45% in the metastatic tumor cells in the bone marrow. Therefore, our data suggest that trisomy 7 may be a common feature associated with local and metastatic progression and serve as a novel marker for human prostate cancer progression.

Extensive genetic alterations in prostate cancer revealed by dual PCR and FISH analysis

The genetic alterations that underlie prostate tumorigenesis are assumed to comprise gain or loss of specific chromosomal regions, whole chromosomes, or sequence-specific mutations. Existing data have not demonstrated clear specificity of whole chromosome or regional chromosomal gain or loss that characterizes entire individual malignant lesions, or all malignant lesions, within a cancerous prostate. We have analyzed tissues from 13 patients for target sequences by using PCR and FISH techniques on paired malignant or prostatic intraepithelial neoplastic (PIN) and benign samples (usually from different areas of the same paraffin section). We exercised stringent histologic control over these samples by examining small (< 5 mm2), discrete regions of sectioned benign, malignant, and PIN tissue. The same histologic region was examined on serial sections by FISH and PCR analysis. The tissues were examined for numerical aberrations involving chromosomes 4 (as a control), 7, 8, 10, and the Y by FISH analysis, and for gain or loss of chromosome 7 and chromosomal arms 8p, 10q, and Yp by PCR analysis. The concurrent application of PCR and FISH to microdissected prostatic tissues yielded evidence of higher frequencies of genetic aberration in prostate cancers than those found with either method alone or by other approaches. These results indicate the power of simultaneous genetic assays that are closely linked to specific tumor histology.

Defining the extent and nature of cytogenetic events in prostatic adenocarcinoma: paraffin FISH vs. metaphase analysis

A comparative study of primary prostatic tumors utilizing conventional metaphase analysis of prostate tumor cultures and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis of paraffin-embedded tissue sections revealed significant differences in type and extent of cytogenetic aberrations. Clonal trisomy 7 was identified in two tumors by metaphase analysis of prostate cultures, but not confirmed in either case by FISH analysis. True gain of chromosome 8 was revealed by FISH analysis in malignant epithelium of four tumors but not in adjacent normal or hyperplastic glands. Neither gain nor loss of this chromosome was observed by metaphase analysis in any of the tumors. Significant monosomy and nullisomy of chromosome 10 was identified in one case by FISH, but no cells with gain or loss of chromosome 10 were observed by metaphase analysis. Significant loss of the Y chromosome was revealed in one tumor by FISH, but no cells with -Y were identified by metaphase analysis. Clonal loss of the Y chromosome was identified in two other tumors by metaphase analysis. Paraffin FISH analysis of these tumors revealed overall monosomy in both, although in one tumor there was extensive nodular loss of the Y chromosome. Paraffin FISH analysis permits identification of cytogenetic aberrations in areas identified as carcinoma (CaP), prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). This technique appears more informative in defining the true extent and nature of cytogenetic aberrations in prostate cancer than metaphase analysis of prostate tumor cultures.