Nurses' hand decontamination practice: results of a local study

Trends in mortality from infection among patients with hematologic malignancies: differences according to hematologic malignancy subtype

Background

Infection is the most important cause of non-relapse mortality in hematologic malignancy patients, leading to increased costs and prolonged hospitalization times. However, comprehensive and comparable reports on infection-specific mortality (ISM) trends in hematologic malignancy patients are lacking.

Objectives

We aimed to provide updated ISM trends and factors associated with ISM among hematologic malignancy patients.

Design

This is a retrospective study.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with the five most common hematologic malignancies from 1983 to 2016 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database were included. Joinpoint regression was used to analyze mortality trends.

Results

ISM decreased beginning in 1983, 1988, and 1994, with yearly decreases of -2.1% for acute leukemia (AL), -1.3% for Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), and -14.3% for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). In contrast, ISM in patients with chronic leukemia (CL) and multiple myeloma (MM) increased dramatically beginning in 2000, with yearly increases of 2.8% and 3.3%, respectively. ISM rates were higher in males than in females across all hematologic malignancy subtypes. The mortality trends significantly differed according to race, age, sex, and stage, which could help in further etiological investigations. Moreover, male sex, older age at diagnosis, black race, and unmarried status were poor prognostic factors for ISM across all hematologic malignancy subtypes.

Conclusion

A promising downward trend in ISM in recent years occurred in patients with AL, HL, and NHL; however, ISM increased dramatically in patients with CL and MM. Our data suggest that risk assessment and careful infection monitoring are recommended for hematologic malignancy patients, particularly those with CL and MM.

Moving beyond hand hygiene monitoring as a marker of infection prevention performance: Development of a tailored infection control continuous quality improvement tool

BACKGROUND

Infection control practice compliance is commonly monitored by measuring hand hygiene compliance. The limitations of this approach were recognized in 1 acute health care organization that led to the development of an Infection Control Continuous Quality Improvement tool.

METHODS

The Pronovost cycle, Barriers and Mitigation tool, and Hexagon framework were used to review the existing monitoring system and develop a quality improvement data collection tool that considered the context of care delivery.

RESULTS

Barriers and opportunities for improvement including ambiguity, consistency and feasibility of expectations, the environment, knowledge, and education were combined in a monitoring tool that was piloted and modified in response to feedback. Local adaptations enabled staff to prioritize and monitor issues important in their own workplace. The tool replaced the previous system and was positively evaluated by auditors. Challenges included ensuring staff had time to train in use of the tool, time to collect the audit, and the reporting of low scores that conflicted with a target-based performance system.

CONCLUSIONS

Hand hygiene compliance monitoring alone misses other important aspects of infection control compliance. A continuous quality improvement tool was developed reflecting specific organizational needs that could be transferred or adapted to other organizations.

Solver Device for Powdery Drugs

Pharmacotherapy is a major treatment method in healthcare centers, and the injection of powdered drugs is among common pharmacotherapy techniques. Medication errors and nosocomial infections are among major health issues in the world. On the other hand, powdered drugs are widely used in hospitals; however, drug mixture is a very time-consuming process. The objective of this invention was to accelerate drug vial mixture, reduce medication errors and nosocomial infections, and save time.

There are different drug mixing devices, each with specific abilities. The present invention not only possesses the abilities of other devices but also can mix drugs [with a diluent] with higher quality and accuracy.

The drug vial mixing device can mix 20 vials at adjustable time and speed with high quality and accuracy. This device is equipped with an infrared system to ensure a complete mixture of powder, and a Bluetooth short range radio system to remotely control all monitoring options of the device. This is a small and simple-to-use device.

The drug vial mixing device can effectively reduce medication errors and nosocomial infections, and save time.

Hand Washing Before and After Applying Different Hand Hygiene Techniques in Places of Public Concern in Tripoli-Libya

Background:

Hand hygiene has being considered as one of the primary measures to improve standards and practice for hospital care and to minimize the transmission of nosocomial pathogens. There is substantial evidence that incidence of hospital acquired infections is reduced by applying hand antisepsis. Regarding hand hygiene and public concern, hand washing has revealed that 85% of the observed adults wash their hands after using public toilets.

Objective:

To compare the efficacy of hand rubbing with an alcohol based solution versus conventional hand washing with antiseptic and non-antiseptic soaps in reducing bacterial counts using different hand hygiene techniques.

Methods:

Ninety-three volunteers took part in this study; 57 from Tripoli Medical Center (TMC); 16 from school; 11 from bank; and 9 from office. All volunteers performed six hand hygiene techniques, immediately before and after a volunteer practice activity: hand washing with non-antiseptic soap for 10 and 30 second (s); hand washing with antiseptic soap for 10, 30 or 60 s; and alcohol-based hand rub. A total of 864 specimens were taken: 432 before and 432 after volunteer's hand hygiene. The fingertips of the dominant hand for each volunteer were pressed on to agar for culture before and after each hand hygiene technique. Plates were incubated at 37oC, and colony-forming units were counted after 48 hours and pathogenic bacteria were identified.

Results:

Results showed that 617 specimens (71.41%) were positive for bacterial growth. 301 (48.78%) were from TMC, 118 (19.12%) were from office; 107 (14.34%) were from school and 91 (14.75%) were from bank.

Conclusion:

Both antiseptic and non–antiseptic soaps did not work properly in reducing bacterial counts of worker’s hands at all places of study, but significantly improved by an application of alcohol based gel.

Enhancing handwashing frequency and technique of primary caregivers in Harare, Zimbabwe: A cluster-randomized controlled trial using behavioral and microbial outcomes

RATIONALE

Consistent hand hygiene prevents diarrheal and respiratory diseases, but it is often not practiced. The disease burden is highest in low-income settings, which need effective interventions to promote domestic handwashing. To date, most handwashing campaigns have focused on promoting frequent handwashing at key times, whereas specifically promoting handwashing techniques proven to be effective in removing microbes has been confined to healthcare settings.

METHODS

We used a cluster-randomized, factorial, controlled trial to test the effects of two handwashing interventions on the behavior of primary caregivers in Harare, Zimbabwe. One intervention targeted caregivers directly, and the other targeted them through their children. Outcome measures were surveyed at baseline and six weeks' follow-up and included observed handwashing frequency and technique and fecal hand contamination before and after handwashing.

RESULTS

Combining the direct and indirect interventions resulted in observed handwashing with soap at 28% of critical handwashing times, while the corresponding figure for the non-intervention control was 5%. Observed handwashing technique, measured as the number of correctly performed handwashing steps, increased to an average of 4.2, while the control averaged 3.4 steps. Demonstrated handwashing technique increased to a mean of 6.8 steps; the control averaged 5.2 steps. No statistically significant group differences in fecal hand contamination before or after handwashing were detected.

CONCLUSIONS

The results provide strong evidence that the campaign successfully improved handwashing frequency and technique. It shows that the population-tailored design, based on social-cognitive theory, provides effective means for developing powerful interventions for handwashing behavior change. We did not find evidence that children acted as strong agents of handwashing behavior change. The fact that the microbial effectiveness of handwashing did not improve despite strong improvements in handwashing technique calls for critical evaluation of existing handwashing recommendations. The aim of future handwashing campaigns should be to promote both frequent and effective handwashing.

Nurses' knowledge and practice of blood-borne pathogens and infection control measures in selected Beni-Suef Hospitals Egypt

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Blood-borne pathogens (BBP) [hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and HIV] pose a considerable infectious risk for nurses, resulting in unwanted health outcomes and psychological stress.

AIM OF THE WORK

This study aimed to assess the knowledge and practices of nurses and define administrative roles regarding in BBP and infection control (IC) measures in selected Beni-Suef Hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study was carried out from December 2014 to January 2015 using a self-administered questionnaire. It was distributed to 400 nurses working in the Health Insurance Organization, Beni-Suef University/general, Nasser Center, and Bebba Hospitals, with a response rate of 77.5% (310/400).

RESULTS

The overall mean scores of knowledge, practice, and role of administration of respondent's nurses (out of 15 points, each) were 7.71±3.15, 9.14±2.47, and 7.03±3.58, respectively. Assessment of knowledge and practice showed that 93.5, 80.3, and 65.8% of nurses were aware that HIV, HBV, and HCV is a BBP, respectively. Autoclave as the best sterilization method for equipment was reported by greater than 50% of the nurses. Urban locality of the healthcare facility and lectures provided to the nursing staff were significantly related to better practice. However, 14.8% of nurses reported a needle-stick injury during the last 6 months and only 53.5% of nurses were vaccinated against HBV.

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Both the knowledge and the practice of Beni-Suef Hospitals' nurses against BBP and IC standards were fair. The administration score was the only independent determinant for practice. Healthcare facilities should focus on increasing nurses' awareness for strict adherence to IC standards, and implement training and preventive programs to minimize the risk of needle-stick injuries. All nurses should be vaccinated against HBV.

Contextual and Psychosocial Determinants of Effective Handwashing Technique: Recommendations for Interventions from a Case Study in Harare, Zimbabwe

Handwashing has been shown to considerably reduce diarrhea morbidity and mortality. To decontaminate hands effectively, the use of running water, soap, and various scrubbing steps are recommended. This study aims to identify the behavioral determinants of effective handwashing. Everyday handwashing technique of 434 primary caregivers in high-density suburbs of Harare, Zimbabwe, was observed and measured as an 8-point sum score of effective handwashing technique. Multiple linear and logistic regression analyses were performed to predict observed handwashing technique from potential contextual and psychosocial determinants. Knowledge of how to wash hands effectively, availability of a handwashing station with functioning water tap, self-reported frequency of handwashing, perceived vulnerability, and action planning were the main determinants of effective handwashing technique. The models were able to explain 39% and 36% of the variance in overall handwashing technique and thoroughness of handscrubbing. Memory aids and guided practice are proposed to consolidate action knowledge, and personalized risk messages should increase the perceived vulnerability of contracting diarrhea. Planning where, when, and how to maintain a designated place for handwashing with sufficient soap and water is proposed to increase action planning. Since frequent self-reported handwashing was associated with performing more effective handwashing technique, behavior change interventions should target both handwashing frequency and technique concurrently.

The effect of a continuous educational program on handwashing compliance among healthcare workers in an intensive care unit

Handwashing is simple, cost-effective and the single most important measure in the prevention of transmission of multiple antibiotic-resistant bacteria, which can spread via the contaminated hands of healthcare workers (HCWs) in intensive care units (ICUs). Despite this simplicity and efficacy, compliance with handwashing protocols is unsatisfactory among HCWs in ICUs. No single interventional measure is successful in improving handwashing compliance.

A continuous educational program was started in February 1998 by the department of infection control, emphasising the importance of handwashing in the prevention of nosocomial infections in the ICU. It took the form of posters, lectures and regular discussions. The posters were pasted in all the strategic areas of the ICU, displaying the indications and precise technique of handwashing. HCWs were directly observed for handwashing compliance, while working in the ICU. Each indication of handwashing was counted as an opportunity of handwashing.

Assessment of handwashing compliance was made once a year during the educational programme. In the final annual assessment in February 2002, out of 1,175 opportunities of handwashing, compliance was observed in 856 (72.8%) among all categories of staff. Highest compliance of 97.5% was recorded among nurses. The compliance among technicians was 47.7%, while the lowest compliance of 37.6% was observed among doctors (RR 2.591, p<0.0001). Opportunities of handwashing utilised with good technique were observed among 98.2% nurses. Handwashing compliance among females was significantly higher (76.2% versus 23.8%) than the male HCWs (RR 3.196, p<0.0001).

A comparative study of the yearly assessments made since the start of the educational program also revealed significant increases in handwashing compliance among nurses (p<0.0001) and technicians (p<0.001), while no statistically significant changes in the handwashing behaviour among doctors was observed during the study period (February 1998 to February 2002).

Disappointing handwashing compliance among doctors visiting and working in the ICU, despite their better understanding of hospital-acquired infections (HAI) and continuous educational programme remains a cause for concern. Additional efforts are required to discover more effective interventional measures to improve handwashing compliance among doctors.

Systematic Review of Studies on Compliance with Hand Hygiene Guidelines in Hospital Care

Objectives.

To assess the prevalence and correlates of compliance and noncompliance with hand hygiene guidelines in hospital care.

Design.

A systematic review of studies published before January 1, 2009, on observed or self-reported compliance rates.

Methods.

Articles on empirical studies written in English and conducted on general patient populations in industrialized countries were included. The results were grouped by type of healthcare worker before and after patient contact. Correlates contributing to compliance were grouped and listed.

Results.

We included 96 empirical studies, the majority (n= 65) in intensive care units. In general, the study methods were not very robust and often ill reported. We found an overall median compliance rate of 40%. Unadjusted compliance rates were lower in intensive care units (30%–40%) than in other settings (50%–60%), lower among physicians (32%) than among nurses (48%), and before (21%) rather than after (47%) patient contact. The majority of the time, the situations that were associated with a lower compliance rate were those with a high activity level and/or those in which a physician was involved. The majority of the time, the situations that were associated with a higher compliance rate were those having to do with dirty tasks, the introduction of alcohol-based hand rub or gel, performance feedback, and accessibility of materials. A minority of studies (n= 12) have investigated the behavioral determinants of hand hygiene, of which only 7 report the use of a theoretical framework with inconclusive results.

Conclusions.

Noncompliance with hand hygiene guidelines is a universal problem, which calls for standardized measures for research and monitoring. Theoretical models from the behavioral sciences should be used internationally and should be adapted to better explain the complexities of hand hygiene.

Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria Infection Control: Study of Compliance With Isolation Precautions in a Paris University Hospital

Isolation practices in a university hospital were analyzed for 137 patients with multidrug-resistant bacteria. Isolation was ordered in writing by physicians for 40% and instituted by nurses for 60%; 74% were isolated. Compliance depended on physician ordering in writing (odds ratio, 36.3; 95% confidence interval, 4.8-274.9). Nurses complied best with hand washing.

Types of interventions used to improve hand hygiene compliance and prevent healthcare associated infection

Hand hygiene is regarded as the most effective means of preventing healthcare associated infection. However, systematic reviews provide limited evidence of effectiveness, a finding that is attributed to the poor quality of research designs, dubious outcome measures and flawed approaches to audit. The ability of interventions to improve hand hygiene compliance has not previously been questioned. This review categorises the types of interventions used to promote hand hygiene and discusses their plausibility, taking selected examples from previous systematic searches. Opinion leaders have emphasised the need for interventions to be underpinned by theory. This is an ambitious endeavour for infection control personnel based in National Health Service trusts. However, it is possible to offer pragmatic suggestions to promote compliance. Initiatives are most likely to be successful if needs analysis is undertaken at the outset to address local barriers and identify enablers to compliance, and if interventions are clearly justified by existing evidence, customised according to occupational group, consider health workers’ needs and preferences for training and updating, and avoid punishment.

Outbreaks where food workers have been implicated in the spread of foodborne disease. Part 11. Use of antiseptics and sanitizers in community settings and issues of hand hygiene compliance in health care and food industries

Hand washing with soap is a practice that has long been recognized as a major barrier to the spread of disease in food production, preparation, and service and in health care settings, including hospitals, child care centers, and elder care facilities. Many of these settings present multiple opportunities for spread of pathogens within at-risk populations, and extra vigilance must be applied. Unfortunately, hand hygiene is not always carried out effectively, and both enteric and respiratory diseases are easily spread in these environments. Where water is limited or frequent hand hygiene is required on a daily basis, such as for many patients in hospitals and astronauts in space travel, instant sanitizers or sanitary wipes are thought to be an effective way of preventing contamination and spread of organisms among coworkers and others. Most concerns regarding compliance are associated with the health care field, but the food industry also must be considered. Specific reasons for not washing hands at appropriate times are laziness, time pressure, inadequate facilities and supplies, lack of accountability, and lack of involvement by companies, managers, and workers in supporting proper hand washing. To facilitate improvements in hand hygiene, measurement of compliant and noncompliant actions is necessary before implementing any procedural changes. Training alone is not sufficient for long-lasting improvement. Multiactivity strategies also must include modification of the organization culture to encourage safe hygienic practices, motivation of employees willing to use peer pressure on noncompliant coworkers, a reward and/or penalty system, and an operational design that facilitates regular hand hygiene.

[Impact of an educational intervention for promoting handwashing and the rational use of gloves in a hospital]

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the impact of educational intervention on hand washing and gloves use.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The educational intervention consisted of a one-hour weekly workshop aimed at doctors and nurses, with a previous questionnaire on hand-washing, a presentation talk on three key points (hand washing, use of gloves, alcohol-based solutions). Adherence to hand washing and use of gloves was re-evaluated 6-9 months after the intervention.

RESULTS

We conducted 34 workshops for 296 health care workers, 239 (80.4%) women and 57 (19.6%) men, with an average age of 40.1 years (range, 18-62 years). Most were nurses (41.2%), nursing assistants (37.8%) and physicians (8.2%). Compliance to hand washing ranged between 29% and 87%. The gloves were used in maneuvers not indicated (19% before giving meals and a 27.7% when performing an ECG). Compliance with hand washing 6-9 months after the workshop improved significantly (p < 0.05) in three of the 5 items. The use of gloves was not significantly different. The intensity of the intervention was inversely related to the incidence of nosocomial infections (RR for every 100 workers intervened in the previous month = 0.89; 95% CI, 0.789-1.003; p = 0.057).

CONCLUSIONS

The training workshops had a positive impact on hand washing compliance, but there was no significant change in the use of gloves. The introduction of education has an inverse relationship to the incidence of nosocomial infections.

Overcrowding and understaffing in modern health-care systems: key determinants in meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus transmission

Recent decades have seen the global emergence of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), causing substantial health and economic burdens on patients and health-care systems. This epidemic has occurred at the same time that policies promoting higher patient throughput in hospitals have led to many services operating at, or near, full capacity. A result has been limited ability to scale services according to fluctuations in patient admissions and available staff, and hospital overcrowding and understaffing. Overcrowding and understaffing lead to failure of MRSA control programmes via decreased health-care worker hand-hygiene compliance, increased movement of patients and staff between hospital wards, decreased levels of cohorting, and overburdening of screening and isolation facilities. In turn, a high MRSA incidence leads to increased inpatient length of stay and bed blocking, exacerbating overcrowding and leading to a vicious cycle characterised by further infection control failure. Future decision making should use epidemiological and economic evidence to evaluate the effect of systems changes on the incidence of MRSA infection and other adverse events.

Efficacy of an extended theory of planned behaviour model for predicting caterers' hand hygiene practices

The main aim of this study was to determine the factors which influence caterers' hand hygiene practices using social cognitive theory. One hundred and fifteen food handlers from 29 catering businesses were observed carrying out 31,050 food preparation actions in their workplace. Caterers subsequently completed the Hand Hygiene Instrument (HHI), which ascertained attitudes towards hand hygiene using constructs from the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) and the Health Belief Model. The TPB provided a useful framework for understanding caterers' implementation of hand hygiene practices, explaining 34% of the variance in hand hygiene malpractices (p < 0.05). Five components were identified as significant predictors of hand hygiene malpractices: attitudes, subjective norms, descriptive norms, perceived behavioural control and intention (p < 0.05). Thus, suggesting that hand hygiene practices cannot be improved solely through the provision of information to individuals. Effective interventions may need to focus on changing the organisational food safety culture.

Measuring handwashing performance in health service audits and research studies

Handwashing is regarded as the most effective way of controlling healthcare-associated infection. A search of the literature identified 42 intervention studies seeking to increase compliance in which the data were collected by directly observing practice. The methods used to undertake observation were so poorly described in most studies that it is difficult to accept the findings as reliable or as valid indicators of health worker behaviour. Most studies were limited in scope, assessing the frequency of handwashing in critical care units. The ethical implications of watching health workers during close patient contact were not considered, especially when observation was covert or health workers were misinformed about the purpose of the study. Future studies should take place in a range of clinical settings to increase the generalizability of findings. Observation should be timed to capture a complete picture of 24h activity and should include all health workers in contact with patients because all have the potential to contribute to cross-infection. Reported details of observation should include: vantage of data collectors; inter-rater reliability when more than one individual is involved; and attempts to overcome the impact of observation on usual health worker behaviour. Ideally an additional data collection method should be used to corroborate or refute the findings of observation, but no well-validated method is presently available.

Hand hygiene among nurses in Turkey: opinions and practices

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

This study aims to identify nurses' practices and opinions of handwashing during routine patient care.

BACKGROUND

Transmission of microorganisms from the hands of healthcare workers is the main source of cross-infection in hospitals and can be prevented by handwashing.

DESIGN AND METHODS

A questionnaire survey was used for this study. A total of 129 clinical nurses at University of Ege Faculty of Medicine Application and Investigation Hospital at Internal Medicine Clinics was surveyed with a response rate of 100%. Data analysis was carried out using SPSS version 10.

RESULTS

The study revealed that nurses have a poor level of knowledge concerning quality of hand washing. All nursing actions related to 'clean' and 'dirty' activities were evaluated using the Fulkerson scale. The majority of nurses reported that they always wash hands after contact with contaminated and non-contaminated patients, equipment and environment. It was found that they did need to wash their hands often but that they were not able to do this because of dense working conditions, insufficiency of necessary materials and drying and sore of hands after frequent washing.

CONCLUSION

To improve hand hygiene and quality of handwashing compliance, additional factors must be considered. These factors include improving healthcare workers--especially nurses'--skin conditions, hand hygiene techniques and disinfections substantially.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Hospitals need to develop and implement innovative educational and motivational programmes tailored to specific groups of health personnel.

The CleanYourHandsCampaign: critiquing policy and evidence base

Handwashing is considered to be the most effective way of reducing cross-infection. Rates of healthcare-associated infection and the incidence of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus are higher in the UK than in many other European countries. The government has responded by introducing the 'CleanYourHandsCampaign' throughout England and Wales, based on the success of the approach employed in Geneva. Alcohol hand rub is placed at every bedside in acute hospitals, ward housekeepers should replenish supplies and feedback on compliance is provided to health workers. Posters and other promotional materials are used to remind health workers and visitors to use the hand rub. Patients are encouraged to ask health workers if they have cleaned their hands before contact. In this paper we argue that the evidence base underpinning the CleanYourHandsCampaign is incomplete. Alcohol hand rub is acknowledged as a useful adjunct to hand hygiene but it is not effective in all circumstances. There is some evidence to support the use of feedback on performance to encourage compliance but no evidence that promotional materials such as posters or patient reminders are effective. The ethics of encouraging hospital patients to take responsibility for their own safety is questioned. Much of the success in Geneva must be attributed to the attention given to contextual factors within the organization that encouraged hand rub use, especially hospital-wide 'ownership' of the initiative by managers and senior health professionals. A customized intervention from another country that fails to consider local organizational factors likely to influence the implementation of the campaign is unlikely to be effective. It is concluded that although hand hygiene is of undoubted importance, undue emphasis should not be placed on it as a 'quick fix' to solve the unacceptably high rates of healthcare-associated infection in National Health Service hospitals.

One plunge or two?—hand disinfection with alcohol gel

OBJECTIVE

To compare health care workers' hand surface coverage using two different volumes of alcohol gel for hand disinfection.

PARTICIPANTS

and methods. A total of 84 members of staff in our hospital were studied. Subjects were asked to disinfect their hands with alcohol gel containing a clear fluorescent substance. Performance was assessed by using UV light to identify areas which had been missed, and the total surface area missed was calculated. A total of 42 subjects received 3.5 ml of alcohol gel, and 42 age-, sex-, and job-matched subjects received 1.75 ml of alcohol gel.

RESULTS

Significantly less area was missed when hand disinfecting with double the volume of alcohol gel; 1.23 versus 6.35% surface area was missed (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Doubling the volume of alcohol gel used for hand disinfection significantly improves the efficiency of coverage of the hands with alcohol gel. This may result in lower bacterial count on the hands and may reduce the spread of nosocomial infections including that of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Occupational Therapists' Knowledge and Practice of Infection Control Procedures: A Preliminary Study

Occupational therapists often meet clients with infections in the course of their work, but research into such therapists' knowledge and practice of infection control procedures is limited. This small postal survey explored the deficit, gathering data from 63/93 (68%) occupational therapists working in 12 randomly selected English health care trusts. The results showed evidence of a discrepancy between respondents' knowledge and practice of infection control procedures. The respondents acknowledged the importance of infection control but did not always take the necessary precautions, reporting some difficulty in judging the latter. The reasons for the study findings and their potential implications for occupational therapy practice, research and education are considered.

Multicentre study on hand hygiene facilities and practice in the Mediterranean area: results from the NosoMed Network

Hand hygiene literature is scarce in the southern Mediterranean area. In order to establish a baseline position, a study was performed in four Mediterranean countries. Seventy-seven hospital wards in 22 hospitals were enrolled and information on hand hygiene practice and facilities were collected. The overall compliance rate was very low (27.6%), and was significantly higher where the perceived risk was considered to be high. Intensive care units showed the highest level of compliance. Analysis by country indicated higher compliance in Egypt (52.8%) and Tunisia (32.3%) compared with Algeria (18.6%) and Morocco (16.9%). Facilities for hand hygiene, particularly consumables, were shown to be deficient. Multi-approach programmes combining the production of official local recommendations, education and regular evaluation of hand hygiene practice are much needed to improve the present situation.

Compliance with hand hygiene and glove use in a university-affiliated hospital

OBJECTIVE

The hands of healthcare workers often transmit pathogens causing nosocomial infections. This study examined compliance with handwashing and glove use.

SETTING

A university-affiliated hospital.

DESIGN

Compliance was observed covertly. Healthcare workers' demographics, hand hygiene facilities, indications for hand hygiene, compliance with handwashing and glove use in each procedure, and duration of handwashing were recorded.

RESULTS

Nine nurses and 33 assistant physicians were monitored during the study. One researcher recorded 1400 potential opportunities for handwashing during 15-minute observation periods. The mean duration of handwashing was 10 +/- 2 seconds. Most healthcare workers (99.3%) used liquid soap during handwashing, but 79.8% did not dry their hands. For all indications, compliance with handwashing was 31.9% and compliance with glove use was 58.8%. Compliance with handwashing varied inversely with both the number of indications for hand hygiene and the number of patient beds in the hospital room. Compliance with handwashing was better in dirty high-risk situations.

CONCLUSION

Compliance with handwashing was low, suggesting the need for new motivational strategies such as supplying feedback regarding compliance rates

Infection control in neonatal intensive care units

Healthcare-associated infection is a major problem in acute hospital settings. Hand decontamination is considered to be the most effective means of preventing healthcare-associated infection, but is poorly performed. Few studies have examined technique, which may be important in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) where clinical procedures are intricate and could result in contamination of many areas of the hand, resulting in cross-infection. This study examined technique in six NICUs. Eighty-eight nurses were observed. A scoring system was developed so that technique could be quantified and subjected to statistical testing. The mean score was 6.29 out of 11 when hands were washed and 3.87 out of 7 when alcohol hand rub was used, indicating that performance was not optimal. Scores for technique were not significantly different in each NICU. Senior nurses achieved higher scores for handwashing (P<0.01), as did nurses holding positive feelings about the atmosphere in their NICU (P=0.04). Junior nurses scored less well on a knowledge questionnaire than senior nurses (P<0.01). Nurses who had been employed in the neonatal unit for less than one year also scored less well (P<0.01). Differences in technique were noted when comparing the beginning and end of long shifts. These differences were not noted at the beginning and end of standard shifts.

Hand-washing and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Effective hand-washing, including drying to decrease skin surface microbial counts, is recognized as a critical factor in infection control policies. It is also recognized that hand-washing is not always undertaken as it should be. Spending large amounts of time with the hands in water is not enough to control infection as the technique of washing hands is more important than merely the length of time under water. Therefore, ways of promoting hand hygiene must be found, as well as finding ways of ensuring that healthcare workers follow hygiene guidelines.

Hand hygiene posters: motivators or mixed messages?

Poster campaigns regarding hand hygiene are commonly used by infection control teams to improve practice, yet little is known of the extent to which they are based on established theory or research. This study reports on the content analysis of hand hygiene posters (N=69) and their messages (N=75) using message-framing theory. The results showed that posters seldom drew on knowledge about effective ways to frame messages. Frequently, they simply conveyed information 'telling' rather than 'selling' and some of this was confusing. Most posters were not designed to motivate, and some conveyed mixed messages. Few used fear appeals. Hand hygiene posters could have a greater impact if principles of message framing were utilized in their design. Suggestions for gain-framed messages are offered, but these need to be tested empirically.

Use of the 'ex vivo' test to study long-term bacterial survival on human skin and their sensitivity to antisepsis

AIMS

To determine bacterial survival on human skin and their sensitivity to antisepsis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

An 'ex vivo' protocol which uses human skin samples placed into diffusion cells, and electron microscopy (EM), were used to study the growth of Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa inoculated onto skin samples over a 46-h incubation period at 32 degrees C. Concurrently variation in skin pH was evaluated at different time intervals during this period. In addition the antimicrobial activity of three antiseptics against the incubated micro-organisms was assessed quantitatively with the 'ex vivo' test, while their detrimental effects against bacteria were observed by EM. All three bacteria were still present in high number after 46 h inoculation on skin, although the concentration of E. coli and S. aureus were reduced by 2.74 and 1.58 log(10) reduction, respectively, over this period of time. Electron micrographs showed clear evidence of cell division and some bacteria appeared to be embedded into the skin layers. The antiseptics tested had some antibacterial activity against bacteria incubated on skin for 3 and 10 h, and EM evidence showed some morphological damages including cellular blebbing and the presence of fibrillar material around the cells. All micro-organisms had an acidifying effect on skin samples.

CONCLUSIONS

Here, it was shown that bacterial pathogens can survive and grow when incubated on human skin. In addition, it is possible that they can penetrate the stratum corneum, which can provide some protection against antisepsis.

SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY

The apparent low bactericidal activity of biocides attributed in part to bacterial protection from skin layers is particularly important to assess in order to ensure antisepsis efficacy.

Epidemiologic background of hand hygiene and evaluation of the most important agents for scrubs and rubs

The etiology of nosocomial infections, the frequency of contaminated hands with the different nosocomial pathogens, and the role of health care workers' hands during outbreaks suggest that a hand hygiene preparation should at least have activity against bacteria, yeasts, and coated viruses. The importance of efficacy in choosing the right hand hygiene product is reflected in the new Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guideline on hand hygiene (J. M. Boyce and D. Pittet, Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 51:1-45, 2002). The best antimicrobial efficacy can be achieved with ethanol (60 to 85%), isopropanol (60 to 80%), and n-propanol (60 to 80%). The activity is broad and immediate. Ethanol at high concentrations (e.g., 95%) is the most effective treatment against naked viruses, whereas n-propanol seems to be more effective against the resident bacterial flora. The combination of alcohols may have a synergistic effect. The antimicrobial efficacy of chlorhexidine (2 to 4%) and triclosan (1 to 2%) is both lower and slower. Additionally, both agents have a risk of bacterial resistance, which is higher for chlorhexidine than triclosan. Their activity is often supported by the mechanical removal of pathogens during hand washing. Taking the antimicrobial efficacy and the mechanical removal together, they are still less effective than the alcohols. Plain soap and water has the lowest efficacy of all. In the new Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guideline, promotion of alcohol-based hand rubs containing various emollients instead of irritating soaps and detergents is one strategy to reduce skin damage, dryness, and irritation. Irritant contact dermatitis is highest with preparations containing 4% chlorhexidine gluconate, less frequent with nonantimicrobial soaps and preparations containing lower concentrations of chlorhexidine gluconate, and lowest with well-formulated alcohol-based hand rubs containing emollients and other skin conditioners. Too few published data from comparative trials are available to reliably rank triclosan. Personnel should be reminded that it is neither necessary nor recommended to routinely wash hands after each application of an alcohol-based hand rub. Long-lasting improvement of compliance with hand hygiene protocols can be successful if an effective and accessible alcohol-based hand rub with a proven dermal tolerance and an excellent user acceptability is supplied, accompanied by education of health care workers and promotion of the use of the product.

Adherence with hand hygiene: does number of sinks matter?

We observed adherence with hand hygiene in 14 units at 4 hospitals with varying sink-to-bed ratios (range, 1:1 to 1:6). Adherence was less than 50% in all units and there was no significant trend toward improved hand hygiene with increased sink-to-bed ratios.

Guideline for Hand Hygiene in Health-Care Settings. Recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HIPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force

The Guideline for Hand Hygiene in Health-Care Settings provides health-care workers (HCWs) with a review of data regarding handwashing and hand antisepsis in health-care settings. In addition, it provides specific recommendations to promote improved hand-hygiene practices and reduce transmission of pathogenic microorganisms to patients and personnel in health-care settings. This report reviews studies published since the 1985 CDC guideline (Garner JS, Favero MS. CDC guideline for handwashing and hospital environmental control, 1985. Infect Control 1986;7:231-43) and the 1995 APIC guideline (Larson EL, APIC Guidelines Committee. APIC guideline for handwashing and hand antisepsis in health care settings. Am J Infect Control 1995;23:251-69) were issued and provides an in-depth review of hand-hygiene practices of HCWs, levels of adherence of personnel to recommended handwashing practices, and factors adversely affecting adherence. New studies of the in vivo efficacy of alcohol-based hand rubs and the low incidence of dermatitis associated with their use are reviewed. Recent studies demonstrating the value of multidisciplinary hand-hygiene promotion programs and the potential role of alcohol-based hand rubs in improving hand-hygiene practices are summarized. Recommendations concerning related issues (e.g., the use of surgical hand antiseptics, hand lotions or creams, and wearing of artificial fingernails) are also included.

Guideline for Hand Hygiene in Health-Care Settings: recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force

The Guideline for Hand Hygiene in Health-Care Settings provides health-care workers (HCWs) with a review of data regarding handwashing and hand antisepsis in health-care settings. In addition, it provides specific recommendations to promote improved hand-hygiene practices and reduce transmission of pathogenic microorganisms to patients and personnel in health-care settings. This report reviews studies published since the 1985 CDC guideline (Garner JS, Favero MS. CDC guideline for handwashing and hospital environmental control, 1985. Infect Control 1986;7:231-43) and the 1995 APIC guideline (Larson EL, APIC Guidelines Committee. APIC guideline for handwashing and hand antisepsis in health care settings. Am J Infect Control 1995;23:251-69) were issued and provides an in-depth review of hand-hygiene practices of HCWs, levels of adherence of personnel to recommended handwashing practices, and factors adversely affecting adherence. New studies of the in vivo efficacy of alcohol-based hand rubs and the low incidence of dermatitis associated with their use are reviewed. Recent studies demonstrating the value of multidisciplinary hand-hygiene promotion programs and the potential role of alcohol-based hand rubs in improving hand-hygiene practices are summarized. Recommendations concerning related issues (e.g., the use of surgical hand antiseptics, hand lotions or creams, and wearing of artificial fingernails) are also included.

Efficacy of handrubbing with alcohol based solution versus standard handwashing with antiseptic soap: randomised clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of handrubbing with an alcohol based solution versus conventional handwashing with antiseptic soap in reducing hand contamination during routine patient care.

DESIGN

Randomised controlled trial during daily nursing sessions of 2 to 3 hours.

SETTING

Three intensive care units in a French university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

23 healthcare workers.

INTERVENTIONS

Handrubbing with alcohol based solution (n=12) or handwashing with antiseptic soap (n=11) when hand hygiene was indicated before and after patient care. Imprints taken of fingertips and palm of dominant hand before and after hand hygiene procedure. Bacterial counts quantified blindly.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Bacterial reduction of hand contamination.

RESULTS

With handrubbing the median percentage reduction in bacterial contamination was significantly higher than with handwashing (83% v 58%, P=0.012), with a median difference in the percentage reduction of 26% (95% confidence interval 8% to 44%). The median duration of hand hygiene was 30 seconds in each group.

CONCLUSIONS

During routine patient care handrubbing with an alcohol based solution is significantly more efficient in reducing hand contamination than handwashing with antiseptic soap.

Nonantibibiotic measures for the prevention of Gram-positive infections

While Gram-negative bacteria remain a leading cause of nosocomial infections such as ventilator-associated pneumonia and catheter-associated urinary tract infections, Gram-positive cocci are now responsible for a large majority of surgical site and bloodstream infections. A shift has occurred during the last decade and multidrug-resistant micro-organisms have become predominant in most referral centers. Severe infections with Gram-positive micro-organisms such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative staphylococci, vancomycin-resistant enterococci, penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae and, more recently, glycopeptide intermediate S. aureus are now regularly reported to be associated with increased morbidity and represent a true health problem in many institutions. The importance of nonantimicrobial measures to prevent infections and further spread is reviewed in this paper. New evidence of the effectiveness of basic infection control measures that have been regarded of little importance during the last two decades by the exponential progress of technologically sophisticated medicine, is discussed.

A survey of rotational use of biocides in hospital pharmacy aseptic units

A postal survey of biocide rotation in UK hospital pharmacy aseptic units was carried out. Seventy per cent of respondents stated that biocides were rotated, most frequently in areas outside critical work zones. High-level disinfection was employed when 'aseptic' conditions were required. Decisions on frequency of rotation were most often based on in-house validation or consultation with colleagues. Toxicity and corrosiveness were the criteria rated most important in a rotation policy. Microbiological monitoring was carried out most frequently in critical work zones but less often for handwashing. Most QC hospital pharmacists supported rotation and would prefer a standard period for all applications (monthly). Guidelines need to be clarified to assist staff in decisions regarding biocide rotation.

Handwashing frequencies in an intensive care unit

As most nosocomial infections are thought to be transmitted by the hands of healthcare workers, handwashing is considered the single most important intervention to prevent nosocomial infections. However, previous studies have shown that handwashing practices are poor, especially among medical personnel. The objective of this study was to assess the rate of handwashing among intensive care unit (ICU) healthcare personnel, and then to propose realistic suggestions so that hand hygiene' could be performed at an optimal level. To achieve this, each healthcare worker in the ICU of Istanbul Medical Faculty was observed directly, and, a comprehensive microbiological investigation was carried out among personnel and of the inanimate environment. The frequency of handwashing was low; 12.9% among medical personnel. Moreover, there was a widespread contamination in the ICU and 28.1% of the healthcare workers were carriers for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The factors that contributed to low compliance of handwashing protocols were: a low staff to patient ratio, excessive use of gloves and deficiencies in the infra-structure of ICU. In heavy workload conditions, alcoholic handrub solutions for quick hand decontamination can be considered as an alternative to handwashing.

Infection control in the ICU

Nosocomial infections (NIs) now concern 5 to 15% of hospitalized patients and can lead to complications in 25 to 33% of those patients admitted to ICUs. The most common causes are pneumonia related to mechanical ventilation, intra-abdominal infections following trauma or surgery, and bacteremia derived from intravascular devices. This overview is targeted at ICU physicians to convince them that the principles of infection control in the ICU are based on simple concepts and that the application of preventive strategies should not be viewed as an administrative or constraining control of their activity but, rather, as basic measures that are easy to implement at the bedside. A detailed knowledge of the epidemiology, based on adequate surveillance methodologies, is necessary to understand the pathophysiology and the rationale of preventive strategies that have been demonstrated to be effective. The principles of general preventive measures such as the implementation of standard and isolation precautions, and the control of antibiotic use are reviewed. Specific practical measures, targeted at the practical prevention and control of ventilator-associated pneumonia, sinusitis, and bloodstream, urinary tract, and surgical site infections are detailed. Recent data strongly confirm that these strategies may only be effective over prolonged periods if they can be integrated into the behavior of all staff members who are involved in patient care. Accordingly, infection control measures are to be viewed as a priority and have to be integrated fully into the continuous process of improvement of the quality of care.

Better compliance and better tolerance in relation to a well-conducted introduction to rub-in hand disinfection

The aim of the study was to demonstrate that the introduction of rub-in hand disinfection (RHD) in hospital units, with the implementation of suitable equipment, drafting of specific protocols, and training users, improved compliance of hand disinfection and tolerance of user's hands. In four hospital units not previously using RHD an external investigator conducted two identical studies in order to measure the rate of compliance with, and the quality of, disinfection practices, [rate of adapted (i.e., appropriate) procedures, rate of correct (i.e., properly performed) procedures, rate of adapted and correct procedures carried out] and to assess the state of hands (clinical scores of dryness and irritation, measuring hydration with a corneometer). Between the two studies, the units were equipped with dispensers for RHD products and staff were trained. Compliance improved from 62.2 to 66.5%, quality was improved (rate of adapted procedures from 66.8% to 84.3%, P > or = 10(-6), rate of correct procedures from 11.1% to 28.9%, P > or = 10(-8), rate of adapted and correct procedures from 6.0 to 17.8%, P > or = 10(-8)). The tolerance was improved significantly (P > or = 10(-2)) for clinical dryness and irritation scores, although not significantly for measurements using a corneometer. This study shows the benefit of introducing RHD with a technical and educational accompaniment.