Hepatitis B vaccination and booster in predialysis patients: a 4-year analysis

Variables linked to hepatitis B vaccination success in non-dialyzed chronic kidney disease patients: Use of a bayesian model

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B vaccination is recommended for chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients before starting dialysis. We performed an analyis aimed to describe the clinical and biological parameters related to the success of vaccination in CKD patients before starting dialysis.

METHODS

We extracted data of 170 non-dialyzed patients who were offered hepatitis B vaccination from a register. They received a first vaccination of 40μg followed by boosters after one, two and six months. Patients were considered protected if their hepatitis B antibody level was >10IU/L, three months apart. A logistic regression and a Bayesian model were used to describe the relationships between variables and the success of vaccination.

RESULTS

Vaccination protected 50.6% of the patients. Model adjustment to the data was higher using the Bayesian model compared to the logistic regression (with area under the ROC curve of 0.955±0.007 vs 0.775±0.066 respectively). The Bayesian model's robustness studied using a 10 fold cross validation showed a percentage of misclassified subjects of 12.4±1.8%, a sensitivity of 87.7±0.3%, a specificity of 87.5±0.3%, a positive predictive value of 87.8±0.3% and negative predictive value of 87.4±0.2%. As classified by the Bayesian model, the variables most related to successful vaccination were, in descending order: age, eGFR, protidemia, albuminemia, cause of renal failure, gender, previous vaccination and weight.

CONCLUSION

The Bayesian network confirmed that both kidney function and nutritional status of patients are important factors to explain the success of vaccination against hepatitis B in CKD patients before dialysis. For research purposes, before an external validation, the network can be used online at www.hed.cc/?s=Bhepatitis&n=ReseauhepatiteBsup10.neta.

Vaccinations in kidney transplant recipients: Clearing the muddy waters

Vaccine preventable diseases account for a significant proportion of morbidity and mortality in transplant recipients and cause adverse outcomes to the patient and allograft. Patients should be screened for vaccination history at the time of pre-transplant evaluation and vaccinated at least four weeks prior to transplantation. For non-immune patients, dead-vaccines can be administered starting at six months post-transplant. Live attenuated vaccines are contraindicated after transplant due to concern for infectious complications from the vaccine and every effort should be made to vaccinate prior to transplant. Since transplant recipients are on life-long immunosuppression, these patients may have lower rates of serological conversion, lower mean antibody titers and waning of protective immunity over shorter period as compared to general population. Recommendations regarding booster dose in kidney transplant recipients with sub-optimal serological response are lacking. Travel plans should be part of routine post-transplant assessment and pre-travel vaccines and counseling should be provided. More studies are needed on vaccination schedules, serological response, need for booster doses and safety of live attenuated vaccines in this special population.

Lower Long-term Efficiency of Intradermal Hepatitis b Vaccine Compared to the Intramuscular Route in Hemodialysis Patients

Intramuscular (IM) and Intradermal (ID) vaccination against hepatitis B (HB) are efficient in hemodialysis patients. We retrospectively analysed the response of 32 patients during 48 consecutive months and compared the results of the two vaccination routes using the recombinant vaccine (Engerix, SKB).

Thirteen patients were vaccinated with 5 mcg ID every 2 weeks (total 8 doses), plus an IM dose on month (M) 12 (group A). Nineteen patients (group B) were vaccinated with 4 IM doses of 20 mcg each, on months M0, 1, 2 and 12.

HB antibodies were measured on M5, M11, M13, M24, M36 and M48. An additional 20 mcg IM dose was given with titers below 10 mIU/ml. Seroconversion, seroprotection and antibody levels were equivalent in both groups up to M13; with the exception of seroconversion rates, a significantly different response was observed afterwards (A/B, in mIU/ml): M5: 399 ± 107 vs 342 ± 69, M13: 536 ± 118 vs 673 ± 61, M24: 278 ± 94 vs 595 ± 81, P=0.02, and M48: 68 ± 29 vs 565 ± 92, P=0.003. Early HBSAB levels did not correlate with those found four years later in both groups. An additional booster dose was given 8 times in 4 group A patients (1–3 doses/patient) and 3 times in 1 group B patient.

Immune response to HB vaccine in hemodialysis patients is initially equivalent by both immunization routes. Late antibody titers were found significantly lower in ID immunization with more frequent booster doses needed.

Evaluation of Response to Hepatitis B Vaccination in Chronic Hemodialysis Patients

Background:

Hemodialysis (HD) patients are at an increased risk of acquiring hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Active HBV immunization in these patients is recommended. A response rate in HD patients is variable but generally lower than healthy individuals.

Objective:

The aim of this study is to assess the response of HD patients to the HBV vaccine and correlate response and long-term immunity to various clinical and biomedical factors.

Patients and Methods:

One hundred and one patients, with a mean age 48.7 ± 18.5 years, received 40 μg of HBV vaccine administered intramuscularly in the deltoid region at 0, 1, 2 and 6 months. The patients' responses to the vaccine were determined by measuring hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb) 6 weeks after the last injection and monitored thereafter at 3-month intervals.

Results:

Seventy-one patients (70.3%) mounted a response with HBsAb >10 mIU/ml 6 weeks following the fourth dose of vaccine, and thus were considered considered as adequate responders. Forty-nine (48.5%) patients mounted an excellent response with HBsAb >100 mIU/ml 6 weeks after the fourth dose. Thirty patients (29.7%) were nonresponders. Responders were significantly younger than nonresponders (P = 0.01). Gender, hemoglobin level, serum albumin, ferritin, parathyroid hormone level and hepatitis C virus infection had no effect on the response to the vaccine. Similarly, there was no difference in diabetic state and adequacy of HD between the two groups. Fifty-nine patients (88%) had persistent protective antibodies at 1 year, while eight (12%) lost such protection. Predictors of persistent immunity at 1 year were high HBsAb level at the completion of the vaccination regime and, to a lesser extent, young age.

Conclusion:

A 70% response rate to HBV vaccine was observed in the cohort of this study. Young age predicts a favorable response to HBV vaccine in HD patients. High (>100 mIU/ml) HBsAb levels achieved at vaccine completion predict persistent immunity at 1 year.

Effectiveness of Herpes Zoster Vaccine in Patients 60 Years and Older With End-stage Renal Disease

BACKGROUND

Unlike in a healthy population, the protection of herpes zoster (HZ) vaccine in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients might be insufficient, considering data demonstrating suboptimal response to other vaccines. The study evaluates the association between HZ vaccination and the subsequent HZ risk among ESRD patients.

METHODS

This cohort study included ESRD patients age ≥60 years who were enrolled in Kaiser Permanente Southern California. The vaccinated cohort included 582 patients who received HZ vaccine during 01/01/2007 through 12/31/2013. Each vaccinated patient was matched to five unvaccinated patients on age, sex, and dialysis duration. Subjects were passively followed through their electronic health records to identify HZ incidence. Cox regression was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) associated with vaccination. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the cumulative incidence were generated.

RESULTS

The number of HZ cases was 16 in 1373 person-years (11.7 per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 7.1-19.0) among the vaccinated and 126 in 5644 person-years (22.3 per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 18.7-26.6) among the unvaccinated. The 36-month cumulative risk of incident HZ was 4.1% and 6.6%, respectively. HZ vaccination was associated with a reduced risk of HZ (adjusted HR = 0.49; 95% CI, .29-.85). The reduced risk seems more prominent if the vaccine is given within two years of dialysis initiation.

CONCLUSIONS

Among ESRD patients age ≥60 years, receipt of HZ vaccine was associated with a lower incidence of HZ. In addition, HZ vaccination soon after the initiation of dialysis may provide greater protection.

Safety and immunogenicity of a recombinant hepatitis B vaccine manufactured by a modified process in renal pre-dialysis and dialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Patients with renal insufficiency are hyporesponsive to vaccination, including to hepatitis B vaccines. A manufacturing process modification for a hepatitis B vaccine (mpHBV) was studied in renal pre-dialysis and dialysis patients.

METHODS

This randomized, open-label, multicenter, estimation study enrolled previously unvaccinated, HBV-seronegative adult dialysis and pre-dialysis patients (N=276, median age 72.0 years). At 0, 1, 6, and 8 months, group 1 received a 1 mL intramuscular dose of mpHBV (containing 40 μg HBsAg) as a single injection, while group 2 received a 1 mL intramuscular dose of a licensed hepatitis B vaccine as two injections (each containing 20 μg HBsAg; 40 μg HBsAg total). Serum antibody to HBsAg (anti-HBs) was measured predose 1, and 1 month postdose 3 and 4. Anti-HBs geometric mean concentration (GMC) and seroprotection rate (SPR, % of subjects with anti-HBs titer ≥10 mIU/mL) were estimated at months 7 and 9.

RESULTS

For group 1, month 7 SPR was 48.5% (49/101, 95% CI: 38.4%, 58.7%); with an additional dose, month 9 SPR increased to 66.7% (66/99, 95% CI: 56.5%, 75.8%). For group 2, month 7 SPR was 57.7% (64/111, 95% CI: 47.9%, 67.0%); with an additional dose, month 9 SPR increased to 69.2% (72/104, 95% CI: 59.4%, 77.9%). group 1 GMCs at months 7 and 9 were 27.5 mIU/mL (95% CI: 15.7, 48.0) and 61.7 mIU/mL (95% CI: 34.2, 111.5), respectively. group 2 GMCs at months 7 and 9 were 48.7 mIU/mL (95% CI: 28.7, 82.7) and 115.8 mIU/mL (95% CI: 65.2, 205.5), respectively. There were 22 serious adverse events; none were considered related to study vaccine.

CONCLUSIONS

Both formulations were immunogenic in this population but required more vaccinations to reach seroprotective levels than comparable regimens in healthy individuals, as expected. The relatively reduced SPRs seen in this population support the need for routine screening and re-dosing in this population.

Hepatitis B vaccination in chronic kidney disease: review of evidence in non-dialyzed patients

CONTEXT

Hepatitis B vaccination of hemodialysis patients is performed all over the world. There are also recommendations from world health organizations to vaccinate patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) prior dialysis commencement, but the implementation of a hepatitis B vaccination program is less common and not well organized.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

This review article summarizes data indicating why, when and how to vaccinate CKD patients before they start renal replacement therapy. Publication for this review was bringing into being from PubMed.

RESULTS

There is an agreement in the nephrological societies and among clinicians and scientists that CKD patients should be vaccinated in early stages of their disease, because a higher glomerular filtration rate is more likely to be associated with the responsiveness to vaccination. Schedules of vaccination and optimal vaccine doses are still being investigated. Differences in data with respect to these problems may result from comparisons of various vaccine doses and vaccination schedules without reference to one gold standard, variations in patients` clinical status and glomerular filtration rate, and also the small groups of the affected patients make statistical analysis non-conclusive. A titer of antibodies to surface antigen of hepatitis B virus (anti-HBs) > 10 IU/L or ≥ 10 IU/L is commonly considered as a marker of seroconversion to anti-HBs positivity after vaccination in both non-dialyzed and dialyzed patients. In advanced CKD, vaccine-induced serconversion rate is seldom observed in more than 90% of vaccinees. Various strategies have been utilized in order to increase vaccine-induced seroconversion rate in patients with advanced CKD. Changing the injection mode, the use of adjuvants and immunostimulants to improve the immunogenicity of existing recombinant hepatitis B vaccines, introduction of mammalian-cell derived pre-S/S HBV vaccines (third-generation vaccines) were tried in order to improve the immunization rate.

CONCLUSIONS

There are a substantial number of non-responders to the hepatitis B vaccine among CKD patients. Therefore, successful prevention of hepatitis B virus transmission and spread will only be attained when hepatitis B vaccination is applied together with full implementation of appropriate infection control procedures.

A randomized controlled trial of two schedules of hepatitis B vaccination in predialysed chronic renal failure patients

BACKGROUND

Patients with chronic renal disease should be vaccinated as soon as dialysis is forestalled, and this could improve the seroconversion of hepatitis B vaccination.

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we aimed to compare seroconversion and immune response rates using 4 doses of 40 μg and 3 doses of 20 μg Euvax B recombinant Hepatitis B surface Antigen (HBs Ag) vaccine administered to predialysis patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In an open, randomized clinical trial, we compared seroconversion rates in 51 predialysis patients with mild and moderate chronic renal failure who received either 4 doses of 40 μg or 3 doses of 20 μg of Euvax B recombinant hepatitis B vaccine administered at 0, 1, 2, 6 and 0, 1, 6 months, respectively.

RESULTS

Differences in seroconversion rates after 4 doses of 40 μg (80.88%) compared to 3 doses of 20 μg (92%) were not significant (P = 0.4124). The mean HBs antibody level after 4 doses of 40 μg at 0, 1, 2, and 6 months (182.2 ± 286.7) was significantly higher than that after 3 doses of 40 μg at 0,1, and 6 months (96.9 ± 192.1) (P = 0.004). Seroconversion after 4 doses of 40 μg (80.8%) was also significantly higher than that after 3 doses of 40 μg (77%) (P = 0.004). Multivariable analysis showed that none of the variables contributed to seroconversion.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that 4 doses of 40 μg did not lead to significantly more seroconversion than 3 doses of 20 μg.

Intradermal versus intramuscular hepatitis B vaccination in hemodialysis patients: a prospective open-label randomized controlled trial in nonresponders to primary vaccination

BACKGROUND

Primary hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination through the intramuscular (IM) route is less efficacious in dialysis patients than in the general population. Previous studies suggest improved seroconversion with intradermal (ID) vaccination.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective open-label randomized controlled trial.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

Hemodialysis patients nonresponsive to primary HBV vaccination.

INTERVENTION

Revaccination with either ID (10 microg of vaccine every week for 8 weeks) [DOSAGE ERROR CORRECTED] or IM (40 microg of vaccine at weeks 1 and 8) HBV vaccine .

OUTCOMES

PRIMARY OUTCOME

proportion of patients achieving HBV surface antibody (anti-HBs) titer of 10 IU/L or greater within 2 months of vaccination course.

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

time to seroconversion, predictors of seroconversion, peak antibody titer, duration of seroprotection, and safety and tolerability of vaccine.

MEASUREMENTS

Anti-HBs titer to 24 months.

RESULTS

59 patients were analyzed. Seroconversion rates were 79% ID versus 40% IM (P = 0.002). The unadjusted odds ratio for seroconversion for ID versus IM was 5.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6 to 18.4) and increased with adjustment for baseline differences. The only factor predictive of seroconversion was the ID vaccination route. The geometric mean peak antibody titer was significantly greater in the ID versus IM group: 239 IU/L (95% CI, 131 to 434) versus 78 IU/L (95% CI, 36 to 168; P < 0.001). There was a trend toward longer duration of seroprotection with ID vaccination. ID vaccine was safe and well tolerated.

LIMITATIONS

Inability to distinguish whether the mechanism of the greater efficacy of ID vaccination was the cumulative effect of multiple injections or route of administration; use of anti-HBs as a surrogate marker of protection; lack of evidence of long-term protection.

CONCLUSIONS

Significantly greater seroconversion rates and peak antibody titers can be achieved with ID compared with IM vaccination in hemodialysis patients nonresponsive to primary vaccination. ID vaccination should become the standard of care in this setting.

The use of vaccines in adult patients with renal disease

In patients with renal disease, infection remains among the most common causes of morbidity and mortality. Alterations in the function of the immune system, as well as unique exposures of this patient population, account for the increased risk. Vaccination is an invaluable tool in preventing many infectious diseases. Unfortunately, responsiveness to vaccination in patients with renal disease can be diminished. In the present review, we examine the available evidence on the use of vaccinations in adult patients at different stages of chronic kidney disease. We address efficacy, clinical outcomes, and potential costs of individual vaccinations and provide our recommendations based on the literature reviewed. We also identify areas in which additional research is needed.

Hepatitis B vaccination in predialysis chronic renal failure patients a comparison of two vaccination schedules

To improve seroconversion to hepatitis B vaccination, it is recommended that patients suffering with chronic renal failure be vaccinated as soon as dialysis is anticipated. We compared seroconversion rates in 121 predialysis patients with moderate chronic renal failure using either 40 or 20 microg of Engerix B recombinant hepatitis B vaccine administered at 0, 1 and 6 months. Seroconversion was not significantly higher after three doses of 40 microg (67%) compared to 20 microg (57%, p=0.27). Multivariable analysis using dose of vaccine, eGFR (MDRD equation), calculated creatinine clearance (Cockcroft--Gault), and age as independent continuous variables showed that neither dose nor degree of renal function contributed to seroconversion. Younger age was weakly associated with improved seroconversion (p=0.052). Seroconversion was attained in 13% of non-responders after a fourth dose of vaccine.

Dialyzing a patient with human immunodeficiency virus infection: what a nephrologist needs to know

The percentage of dialysis centers that have reported dialyzing human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients increased from 11% in 1985 to 37% in 2000. Being primary care physicians for the dialysis patients, nephrologists are frequently confronted with the management of HIV-infected dialysis patients especially in urban centers. The aims of the present review are to discuss issues that are unique to HIV infection and end-stage renal disease, and to provide dialysis caretakers with sufficient information to help them optimize care and improve outcomes of these patients. Issues related to the choice of renal replacement therapy, vascular access, management of anemia, vaccination, and antiretroviral therapies are discussed in detail.

Stage of chronic kidney disease predicts seroconversion after hepatitis B immunization: earlier is better

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains a concern in dialysis populations, and vaccination programs have been less successful than those in the general population. Reasons for poor response include malnutrition, uremia, and the generalized immunosuppressive state of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). This prospective cohort study evaluated factors impacting on the effectiveness of a vaccination program before dialysis therapy initiation, including level of kidney function.

METHODS

All patients receiving care in the Kidney Function Clinic (St Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, Canada) were screened for previous HBV infection or vaccination. Those who were marker negative were administered a standardized hepatitis B vaccination schedule recommended for patients with CKD. The primary outcome measure, seroconversion, is defined as hepatitis B surface antibody titer greater than 10 IU 3 months after completion of the vaccination schedule.

RESULTS

The study population of 165 patients included 64% men with a mean age of 60 years, mean serum creatinine level of 3.4 +/- 1.5 mg/dL (300 +/- 133 micromol/L), and median estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 20 mL/min (interquartile range, 14 to 20). Seroconversion rate was 82%. Multivariate analyses showed the independent predictive value of level of GFR. The model showed that patients with the lowest level of kidney function and who were older and had diabetes were less likely to seroconvert (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This is the largest study to show in a well-characterized cohort that patients with higher GFR levels are more likely to respond to hepatitis B vaccination programs with seroconversion, independent of other factors. Future studies will explore specific mechanisms to explain this phenomenon.

Hepatitis B vaccination for patients with chronic renal failure

BACKGROUND

Chronic renal failure patients are at particular risk of hepatitis B virus infection. Early studies have demonstrated that renal failure patients benefit from vaccination; however, not all studies have consistently shown benefit.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the beneficial and harmful effects of hepatitis B vaccine and of a reinforced vaccination series in chronic renal failure patients.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, The Cochrane Renal Group Controlled Trials Register, The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register on The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2002),PubMed/MEDLINE (1966 to July 2003), EMBASE (1985 to November 2003), Current Clinical Practice Guidelines (Canadian Immunization Guide and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Surveillance Manual), and Science Citation Index as well as journals, published abstracts, and reference lists of articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials comparing plasma vaccine with placebo, recombinant vaccine with placebo, recombinant vaccine with plasma vaccine, and a reinforced vaccination series (ie, more than three inoculations) with three inoculations of vaccine in chronic renal failure patients.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Primary outcome measures included incidence of patients developing hepatitis B virus antibodies and infections while secondary outcomes included adverse events, liver-related morbidity, and mortality. Random effects models were used and reported relative risks and 95% confidence intervals (RR and 95% CI).

MAIN RESULTS

We included seven randomised clinical trials. None of them had high quality. Plasma vaccine was significantly more effective than placebo in achieving hepatitis B antibodies (RR 23.0, 95% CI 14.39 to 36.76, 3 trials). We found no statistically significant difference between plasma vaccine or placebo regarding hepatitis B virus infections (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.20 to 1.24). We found no statistically significant differences between recombinant vaccine and plasma vaccine in achieving hepatitis B antibodies (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.28 to 1.53, 2 trials). Heterogeneity was significant and appeared to be attributable to the dose of vaccine. Two trials examined a reinforced recombinant vaccine strategy, which was not statistically more effective than three inoculations of recombinant vaccine regarding development of hepatitis B antibodies (RR 1.36, 95% CI 0.85 to 2.16).

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

Plasma derived vaccines are more effective than placebo in achieving hepatitis B antibodies, while no statistically significant difference was found between recombinant and plasma vaccines. No statistically significant difference of effectiveness was observed between a reinforced vaccination series versus routine vaccinations of three inoculations of recombinant vaccine.

The effect of erythropoietin therapy and hemoglobin levels on the immune response to Engerix-B vaccination in chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis have an increased risk of acquiring hepatitis B infection. Only 43-66% of dialysis patients develop effective anti-HBs titers after vaccination.

AIM

To evaluate the effect of recombinant erythropoietin (rEPO) therapy and basal hemoglobin levels on the outcome of the immune response to four doses of IM 40 microg Engerix-B vaccination in hemodialysis and chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients before starting replacement therapy.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

One hundred and three patients were included in the study: 34 hemodialysis patients treated with rEPO (Group A), 36 predialytic patients who did not treated with rEPO (Group B) and 33 predialytic patients treated with rEPO (Group C). Plasma creatinine in predialytic patients was 2-7 mg/dL. All patients' HBsAg and anti-HBs antibodies were negative. Patients were immunized with IM 40 microg Engerix-B at 0, 1, 3, and 6 months. Anti-HBs titers were measured at 7th month.

RESULTS

Eighty seven point one percent of patients from group C developed protective anti-HBs titers compared with 69.4% from group B and 44.1% from group A (p = 0.001). Patients from all groups with baseline hemoglobin levels above 11 gr/dL developed protective anti-HBs titers significantly more than patients with baseline hemoglobin levels below 11 gr/dL (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Predialytic patients treated with rEPO and with hemoglobin levels higher than 11 gr/dL had significantly better immune response outcomes to Engerix-B vaccination. Immunization against hepatitis B infection should be considered at early stages of CKD prior to the deterioration in kidney functions and the development of renal anemia.

Efficacy of GM-CSF as an adjuvant to hepatitis B vaccination in patients with chronic renal failure--results of a prospective, randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Chronic renal failure patients on hemodialysis are at an increased risk of acquiring hepatitis B infection. Hence vaccination against hepatitis B assumes great importance in these patients. However, the response to hepatitis B vaccination is poor, even when 4 double doses (40 microg) of the vaccine are given. This study was conducted to determine the efficacy of GM-CSF as an adjuvant to hepatitis B vaccine in CRF patients.

METHODS

CRF patients including both hemodialysis (HD) and non-dialysis (ND) patients were randomized to receive either placebo or a single injection of GM-CSF (in varying doses of 50 microg, 100 microg, 150 microg) a day prior to the 1st dose of recombinant hepatitis B vaccine (40 microg). Three more doses of the vaccine were given at 1, 2, and 6 months. The anti-HBs antibody titres were measured by ELISA at 3 and 7 months. Patients having antibody titres less than 10 IU/L were considered non-responders. The response rate and mean antibody titers were compared between the control (I) and GM-CSF (II) groups.

RESULTS

In group I, 31 and 27 patients were available for evaluation at 3 and 7 months respectively. In group II, 33 and 28 patients could be evaluated at the same time points. Within the control group (group I), the response rate in hemodialysis patients (63.6%) was lower as compared to non-dialysis patients (81.2%). The response rate in group II was higher than that in group I at both 3 months as well as 7 months (78.1% vs. 62.3% and 89.3% vs. 74.1%, p = ns). The best response rates in group II were observed when GM-CSF was used in a dose of 150 microg (90.9% at 3 months and 100% at 7 months). The mean antibody titers were also found to be higher in the group II as compared to group I (409.6 vs. 243.9 IU/L, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The results of this randomized, prospective study suggest that: 1. Patients with chronic renal failure should be vaccinated for hepatitis B as chronic renal insufficiency is established. 2. GM-CSF is an effective adjuvant to hepatitis B vaccine in these patients especially when a priming dose of 150 microg is used prior to 1st dose of hepatitis B vaccination.

Immunologic defects and vaccination in patients with chronic renal failure

Patients with chronic renal failure suffer from defective host defenses which are directly the result of the renal impairment, in addition to those dependent on the primary illness leading to the renal failure. The mechanisms underlying the defective responses in phagocytic cells, lymphocytes and antigen processing are likely due to either failure to adequately eliminate suppressive compounds by the defective kidneys or to improper metabolic processing of the factors by the damaged renal parynchema. That some of the defects are reversed by transplantation and not dialysis suggests that renal parenchymal metabolic activities may be involved, although it is also possible that functioning glomerular cells are capable of filtering substances that membranes are not currently capable of eliminating. The current strategy for dealing with the immunodeficiency appears to be totally based on developing means to circumvent the defective function. The other approach, correction of the impaired function, cannot be even considered until the mechanisms underlying the defective function of the cells involved in defenses are better delineated. It seems possible that one or a few compounds are pivotal in altering the function of all the affected cell lines, since, with only a small amount of effort, it is possible to relate the dysfunction to abnormal cell membrane functions in phagocytic cells, dendritic cells and lymphocytes. Until the biochemical basis of the dysfunction of all the cell types affected are better defined, such exercises cannot be translated into better management of patients with chronic renal failure. Proper function of host defenses requires that appropriate cells can properly respond to threats to host viability. For the cells of the immune system (phagocytes and lymphocytes) this means that their response to regulatory molecules be appropriate, that their mobility be normal, that their adherence to substrates be preserved, and that they can generate the appropriate response to the challenge. For neutrophils, for example, it is necessary that they recognize and mobilize appropriately to chemotactic stimuli, that they be able to adhere to and migrate through endothelial lining, that their phagocytic activity be sufficient, and that they can kill and degrade endocytosed particles and generate appropriate secretions. Similar lists of requirements for good function can be generated for any cell type in the immune defense system. Uremia, as well as currently available treatments for uremia, directly or indirectly alters the function of all phases of appropriate immune cell function. Defective host responses in uremia have been recognized for decades and there has been considerable effort in the past decade to better define the extent and mechanisms of impaired defenses. Despite the multitude of major defects in humoral, cellular, and inflammatory processes, uremic patients who are cared for today, although they remain at higher risk of serious infectious complications, can and do maintain a good quality of life, with most remaining free of major infections for years and decades.

A case of hepatitis B in a haemodialysis unit

A patient probably acquired hepatitis B virus (HBV) from a transfused infected unit of fresh frozen plasma. She had been on regular haemodialysis for four months before her infection was discovered. One hundred and seventy-six patients and 304 staff contacts were screened and there were no secondary cases. At donation the infected blood donor was hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) negative but subsequently proved to be anti-hepatitis B core (HBc)-positive and positive for HBV DNA. Consideration should be given to screening blood donations for anti-HBc in addition to HBsAg. Vigilance needs to be maintained on dialysis units against sporadic cases of hepatitis B. All staff should be immunized and be able to demonstrate protective levels of anti-HBs.