The role of concurrent determinations of pleural fluid and tissue carcinoembryonic antigen in the distinction of malignant mesothelioma from metastatic pleural malignancies

Tissue Polypeptide Antigen (TPA) in Pleural Effusions

The usefulness of tumor marker assay in pleural effusions for differential diagnosis is still debated. From the observation of common antigens on tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA) and keratins 8, 18 and 19 and vimentin, all substances contained in normal and neoplastic mesothelium, we felt it opportune to evaluate the use of TPA assay in 105 pleural effusions (46 benign and 59 malignant). The values were much higher than those found in blood. In hydrothorax the median value was 454 U/l (range, 59–1923), in exudative effusions 846 U/l (range, 258–4485), in metastatic pleural effusions 1277 U/l (range, 58–32352) and in mesotheliomas 7705 (range, 759–16000). The maximum value found in nonmalignant effusions was 4485 U/l; this value was taken as a cutoff level, so only 29.9 % of the tumors were positive to the test. Our results showed this assay to be not very important for a differential diagnosis of malignant and nonmalignant pleural effusions. Nevertheless, the different TPA patterns in mesotheliomas (66.6 % positive) and metastatic pleural effusions (15.9 %) suggest that further studies are warranted.

Soluble markers for diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a highly aggressive and invasive tumor, whose incidence is expected to peak, in many countries, at the end of the present decade, 20–40 years after the peak of asbestos use (asbestos being the most important etiological factor). MPM has a poor prognosis, in part, owing to a difficult and often late diagnosis hindered by a lack of available tests able to diagnose or predict this cancer in its early stages. Recently, there has been increased interest in noninvasive, economic and well-accepted diagnostic tests for screening of asbestos-exposed subjects, as well as for monitoring response of MPM patients to treatment. Several markers have been studied in biofluids, such as serum, plasma and pleural effusions, especially using ELISA, and some of them are still under investigation. However, only mesothelin and ostepontin have proven levels of sensitivity and specificity that are worth testing in the clinical setting.

Diagnostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen in malignant pleural effusion: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Conventional tests are not always helpful in making a diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion (MPE). Many studies have investigated the utility of pleural carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in the early diagnosis of MPE. The present meta-analysis determined the accuracy of CEA measurement in the diagnosis of MPE.

METHODS

A systematic review of English language studies was conducted and data on the accuracy of pleural CEA concentrations in the diagnosis of MPE were pooled using random effects models. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to summarize the overall test performance.

RESULTS

Forty-five studies met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. The summary estimates for CEA in the diagnosis of MPE were: sensitivity 0.54 (95% CI: 0.52-0.55), specificity 0.94 (95% CI: 0.93-0.95), positive likelihood ratio 9.52 (95% CI: 6.97-13.01), negative likelihood ratio 0.49 (95% CI: 0.44-0.54) and diagnostic odds ratio 22.5 (95% CI: 15.6-32.5). Analysis of a subset of 11 studies which examined the value of pleural CEA in ruling out a diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma found that the sensitivity and specificity of a CEA level exceeding cut-off values were 0.97 (95% CI: 0.93-0.99) and 0.60 (95% CI: 0.55-0.65), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Measurement of pleural CEA is likely to be a useful diagnostic tool for confirming MPE, and is also helpful in the differential diagnosis between malignant pleural mesothelioma and metastatic lung cancer. The results of CEA assays should be interpreted in parallel with clinical findings and the results of conventional tests.

Diagnostic value of tumor markers for differentiating malignant and benign pleural effusions of Iranian patients

In order to evaluate the diagnostic yield of tumor markers in differentiating malignant and benign pleural effusions, we carried out a prospective study in a group of Iranian people. Pleural and serum levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 15-3 (CA 15-3), neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and cancer antigen 125 (CA 125) were assayed prospectively in patients with pleural effusion (40 malignant and 37 benign). The highest sensitivity was obtained with a combination of CA 15-3 in serum, and CA 15-3 and CEA in pleural fluid (80%), also with combination of CA 15-3 in serum, and CA 15-3, NSE and CEA in pleural fluid (80%). The highest specificity was obtained with combination of CA 15-3 in serum, and CA 15-3 and NSE in pleural fluid (100%), and also with combination of CA 15-3 in serum, and CA15-3, NSE and CEA in pleural fluid (100%).

Diagnostic value of CEA, CA 15-3, CA 19-9, CYFRA 21-1, NSE and TSA assay in pleural effusions

The aim of this study was to evaluate the individual and combined diagnostic utility of six tumor markers in patients with pleural effusion. Pleural and serum levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 15-3 (CA 15-3), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9), cytokeratin fragment 19 (CYFRA 21-1), neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and total sialic acid (TSA) were assayed in 74 patients with pleural effusions (44 malignant and 30 benign). All tumor markers except TSA and NSE were increased in both serum and pleural fluid of patients with malignant diseases. Using the cut-off values 3 ng/ml, 14 U/ml, 5 U/ml, 8 ng/ml and 70 mg/dl for pleural fluid CEA, CA 15-3, CA 19-9, CYFRA 21-1 and TSA, respectively, the sensitivity (%) and specificity (%) of these tumor markers were as follows: CEA; 52/77, CA 15-3; 80/93, CA 19-9; 36/83, CYFRA 21-1; 91/90, TSA; 80/67, for differentiating malignant effusions from benign. When CA 15-3 and CYFRA 21-1 combined, the sensitivity and specificity were increased (100 and 83%, respectively). Classifying the malignant effusions as bronchial carcinoma and malignant pleural mesothelioma, CEA was shown to have the highest sensitivity and specificity (88 and 90%, respectively) while the combination of CEA with other tumor markers increased sensitivity but decreased specificity. According to our results, tumor markers are not suitable for the differential diagnosis of malignancy.

Use of tumor markers for differential diagnosis of mesothelioma and secondary pleural malignancies

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to assess diagnosis value of tumor markers for differential diagnosis between mesothelioma and other pleural tumors.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Prospective study of 85 patients attending our hospital with malignant pleural effusion. The diagnostic approach involved routine pleurocentesis followed by pleural needle. When precise diagnosis was not achieved, thoracoscopy with pleural biopsies was performed. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), hyaluronic acid, tissue polypeptide antigen and cyfra 21 to 1 were measured in serum and pleural fluid.

RESULTS

By using receiver operating characteristics curves and area under curves, the best diagnostic characteristics were obtained with pleural and serum CEA concentrations. The area under the curve was larger for pleural ACE than for serum ACE. The sensitivity and specificity of a pleural CEA level exceeding 3 ng/mL for ruling out the diagnosis of mesothelioma were 100% and 77%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

A CEA level above 3 ng/mL in pleural fluid eliminated the diagnosis of mesothelioma, whereas the other markers were not sufficiently discriminant. However, despite a negative predictive value of 100% at a cutoff of 3 ng/mL, CEA assay in pleural fluid only avoids a small number of diagnostic thoracoscopies.

Diagnostic utility of CYFRA 21-1, carcinoembryonic antigen, CA 125, neuron specific enolase, and squamous cell antigen level determinations in the serum and pleural fluid of patients with pleural effusions

BACKGROUND

To the authors' knowledge the role of tumor marker determination in the differential diagnosis of pleural effusions has not been established definitively. The current article reports the results of a study of CYFRA 21-1, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen 125 (CA 125), squamous cell antigen (SCC), and neuron specific enolase (NSE) in the serum and pleural fluid of patients with pleural effusions of diverse etiologies.

METHODS

One hundred forty-six patients with pleural effusions (43 malignant, 47 tuberculous, 32 miscellaneous benign, and 24 paramalignant) were studied prospectively. Levels of CYFRA 21-1, CA 125, CEA, NSE, and SCC were measured by radioimmunoassay in the pleural fluid in all patients and in the serum in 118 patients.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the serum and pleural fluid levels of tumor markers with the exception of CA 125, which was higher in the pleural fluid. With maximum specificity, the highest sensitivity in the diagnosis of pleural malignancy was obtained with a combination of CYFRA 21-1 (with a cutoff value of 150 U/L), CEA (with a cutoff value of 40 ng/mL), and CA 125 (with a cutoff value of 1000 ng/mL) in pleural fluid. NSE and SCC added no diagnostic value. The simultaneous use of tumor markers and cytology in pleural fluid increased the sensitivity from 55.8% to 81%.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that a combination of CYFRA 21-1, CEA, and CA 125 in the pleural fluid can be a useful addition to pleural cytology in the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion.

Diagnostic value of CA 72-4, carcinoembryonic antigen, CA 15-3, and CA 19-9 assay in pleural fluid. A study of 207 patients

BACKGROUND

The differential diagnosis of pleural effusion is a frequent clinical problem. Several tumor markers have been evaluated in pleural fluid, but the value of CA 72-4 assay and of combinations of tumor marker assays has not been firmly established. To find a minimally invasive tool for differentiating between pleural effusions of malignant or benign origin, the authors assessed the diagnostic value of CA 72-4, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), CA 15-3, and CA 19-9 assays in pleural fluid individually and in combination.

METHODS

The authors prospectively studied 207 patients with pleural effusion (65 malignant, 48 tuberculous, 24 parapneumonic, 26 transudates, 14 miscellaneous, and 30 of unknown nonneoplastic origin). The levels of CA 72-4, CEA, CA 15-3, and CA 19-9 were measured in pleural fluid by radioimmunoassay.

RESULTS

CA 72-4 assay in pleural fluid had an acceptable sensitivity and very good specificity for diagnosing malignant pleural effusion. The combination of CA 72-4 plus CEA plus CA 15-3 yielded the best accuracy, 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85-0.94), with a sensitivity of 0.78 (95% CI, 0.67-0.88), specificity of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.90-0.98), positive predictive value of 0.88 (95% CI, 0.77-0.95), and negative predictive value of 0.91 (range, 0.85-0.94). A good clinical strategy may be to begin with a CEA assay (specificity of I) and then, if it is negative, to add CA 15-3 or even CA 72-4 assays to improve sensitivity. The diagnosis of mesothelioma is more likely with a high CA 15-3 level and normal CEA and CA 19-9 levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Assays of CEA, CA 72-4, and CA 15-3 in pleural fluid, or the combination of CEA with CA 15-3 and CA 72-4, was useful in differentiating between pleural effusion of malignant and benign origin.

Immunocytochemical characterization of cell lines from human malignant mesothelioma: characterization of human mesothelioma cell lines by immunocytochemistry with a panel of monoclonal antibodies

A panel of nine monoclonal antibodies was used to characterize human mesothelioma cell lines that we established from human malignant mesothelioma. The antigens detected were cytokeratin, vimentin, epithelial membrane antigen, carcinoembryonic antigen, Leu-M1 (CD15), desmin, factor VIII-related antigen (von Willebrand factor antigen), OV632, and ME1, a specific monoclonal antibody directed against human malignant mesothelioma. The technique used was the alkaline phosphatase anti-alkaline phosphatase method. All 30 cell lines, either epithelial, sarcomatous, or mixed, showed strong reactivity with cytokeratin and vimentin antibodies. None of the cell lines demonstrated any reactivity with carcinoembryonic antigen, Leu-M1, or factor VIII antibodies; moreover, all of 22 cell lines studied were positive for ME1 antibody and 10 of 12 cell lines studied were positive for OV632. Some interesting features were noted: only two of the 30 cell lines presented a weak positive staining with epithelial membrane antigen, and nine of 19 cell lines tested demonstrated a cytoplasmic staining pattern with desmin antibody. These results show that established human mesothelioma cell lines still possess the immunocytochemical characteristics that are basically consistent with the immunohistochemical features described in tumor tissues of malignant mesothelioma. These characteristics can be used to identify the mesothelioma cells grown from human malignant mesothelioma. Hence, the mesothelioma cell lines will provide a useful tool for the investigation of the cell biology of the tumor and the mechanisms of mesothelial cell transformation, as well as the in vitro evaluation of the effects of some drugs in order to develop new therapies for malignant mesothelioma.

Marker profile of mesothelial cells versus ovarian carcinoma cells

We investigated the marker profile of human ascitic and cultured mesothelial cells, and compared it to that of ovarian carcinoma cells which are related in terms of their histogenesis, unrelated colon carcinomas being used as reference. Mesothelial and ovarian carcinoma cells could not be distinguished by (intermediate) filament typing, using monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) to keratins, vimentins and desmins. Colon carcinomas differed from mesothelial cells and ovarian carcinomas by the absence of keratin-7 filaments. The epithelial marker BW 495/36 was completely negative on mesothelial cells and positive on all ovarian and colon carcinoma cells. While CEA was found on about 85% of all colon carcinomas, CEA expression on mesothelial cells and ovarian carcinoma cells was below 20%. The ovarian carcinoma markers (OV-TL 3, OV-TL 10, OC 125, MOV 18) were strongly positive on ovarian carcinomas and negative on colon carcinomas (or limited to traces of immunofluorescence on some samples). Although the mesothelial cells showed weak or negative reactivity with these markers, OC 125 antigen was found by immunoelectron microscopy on the surface of cultured mesothelial cells, and was shed in the culture supernatant at concentrations of 50, 28, and 25 CA 125 U/ml/10(4) positive cells. This suggests that mesothelial cells may be responsible for the synthesis of CA 125 in ascitic fluid. The data indicate that ovarian carcinomas, mesothelial cells and colon carcinomas can be distinguished using a combination of anti-keratin antibodies with BW 495/36 and anti-ovarian carcinoma markers.

Detection of malignant pleural effusions by tumor marker evaluation

Cytologic examination and determination of tumor markers (PHI, LDH, alpha-1-glycoprotein, alpha-2-HS-glycoprotein, beta 2-microglobulin, ferritin [corrected], sialic acid, IgE, fetoprotein, CEA, beta HCG and beta 1-SP-glycoprotein) were carried out in pleural fluid samples obtained from 70 patients with suspected neoplasia. Tumor markers were also determined in sera. The protein content of all pleural effusions was greater than or equal to 3 g/dl. Patients were grouped according to diagnosis as follows: (a) 42 with neoplastic diseases (7 mesotheliomas and 19 lung, 4 ovarian, 3 breast and 8 miscellaneous cancers), (b) 22 with benign inflammations and (c) 6 with congestive effusions. Of the parameters examined, only CEA and beta-HCG [corrected] gave information that the effusion was probably malignant. Using 6 ng/ml as cut-off for CEA and 10 mIU/ml for beta HCG, the sensitivity was 57.1% and 45.2%, respectively, specificity was 92.8% for both parameters and test efficiency 0.75 and 0.69, respectively. When CEA and beta HCG were considered together sensitivity increased to 73.8% and efficiency to 0.78. CEA and/or beta HCG were positive in the pleural effusions of 19 of the 20 malignant pleural effusions, all with a negative cytologic examination, which subsequently became positive in 8. Because of their high specificity, these two parameters are a useful tool and can be routinely measured to evaluate pleural effusions of dubious origin, even if CEA and beta HCG cannot, on [corrected] their own, define the primary malignancy.