Residual, unresectable, or recurrent colorectal cancer: external beam irradiation and intraoperative electron beam boost +/- resection

Integration of radiation oncology with surgery as combined-modality treatment

Integration of surgery and radiation (external beam, EBRT; intraoperative, IORT) has become more routine for patients with locally advanced primary cancers and those with local-regional relapse. This article discusses patient selection and treatment from a more general perspective, followed by a discussion of patient selection and treatment factors in select disease sites (pancreas cancer, colorectal cancer, retroperitoneal soft-tissue sarcomas). Outcomes with combined modality treatment (surgery, EBRT alone or with concurrent chemotherapy, IORT) are discussed. The ultimate in contemporary integration of radiation and surgery is found in patients who are candidates for surgery plus both EBRT and IORT.

Intra-operative radiotherapy of rectal cancer: results of the French multi-institutional randomized study

PURPOSE

To assess efficacy and tolerance of intra-operative radiation therapy (IORT) in patients suffering from locally advanced rectal cancer, treated with preoperative radiotherapy followed by surgical resection.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In this French, multicenter, comparative, phase III study, 142 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (T3 or T4 or N+, and M0), treated with a 4-week preoperative radiotherapy (40 grays) were randomly assigned to either surgical resection alone (

CONTROL GROUP

n=69) or combined to 18-gray intra-operative radiation therapy (IORT group: n=73) between 1993 and 2001.

RESULTS

The 5-year cumulative incidence of local control was 91.8% with IORT and 92.8% with surgery alone (p=0.6018); the mean duration without local relapse (Kaplan-Meier method) was 107 versus 126 months, respectively. No statistically significant difference was demonstrated for overall survival (p=0.2578) disease-free survival (p=0.7808) and probability of metastatic relapse (p=0.6037) with 5-year cumulative incidences of 69.8% versus 74.8%, 63.7% versus 63.1%, and 26.1% versus 30.2%, respectively. 48 patients of the IORT group and 53 patients of the control group were alive with a median follow-up of 60.1 and 61.2 months, respectively. Post-operative complications were observed in the IORT group in 21 patients (29.6%) and in the control group in 13 patients (19.1%) (p=0.15), with an acceptable tolerance profile.

CONCLUSIONS

Although this randomized study did not demonstrate any significant improvement in local control and disease-free survival in rectal cancer patients treated with preoperative radiation therapy receiving IORT or not, it confirmed the technical feasibility and the necessity for evaluating IORT for rectal carcinoma in further clinical studies.

Patterns of failure and local control after intraoperative electron boost radiotherapy to the presacral space in combination with total mesorectal excision in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate local control and patterns of failure in patients treated with intraoperative electron beam radiotherapy (IOERT) after total mesorectal excision (TME), to appraise the effectiveness of intraoperative target definition.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We analyzed the outcome of 243 patients with rectal cancer treated with IOERT (median dose, 10 Gy) after TME. Eighty-eight patients received neoadjuvant and 122 patients adjuvant external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) (median dose, 41.4 Gy), and in 88% simultaneous chemotherapy was applied. Median follow-up was 59 months.

RESULTS

Local failure was observed in 17 patients (7%), resulting in a 5-year local control rate of 92%. Only complete resection and absence of nodal involvement correlated positively with local control. Considering IOERT fields, seven infield recurrences were seen in the presacral space, resulting in a 5-year local control rate of 97%. The remaining local relapses were located as follows: retrovesical/retroprostatic (5), anastomotic site (2), promontorium (1), ileocecal (1), and perineal (1).

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative electron beam radiotherapy as part of a multimodal treatment approach including TME is a highly effective regimen to prevent local failure. The presacral space remains the site of highest risk for local failure, but IOERT can decrease the percentage of relapses in this area.

Can histopathologic assessment of circumferential margin after preoperative pelvic chemoradiotherapy for T3-T4 rectal cancer predict for 3-year disease-free survival?

PURPOSE

This study set out to determine the impact of a positive circumferential resection margin (CRM) (R1-R2) and pathologic downstaging on local recurrence and survival in patients with borderline resectable or unresectable rectal adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 150 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer were treated with long-course neoadjuvant CRT using low-dose folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil. CRT was followed 6-12 weeks later by surgical excision. The CRM rate and incidence, site, and pattern of local and systemic recurrences were recorded. The median follow-up was 25 months.

RESULTS

The overall median survival was 37 months, with a 5-year overall survival rate of 34%. Of the 150 patients, 122 underwent curative resection; 12% had a complete pathologic response, and downstaging to pT1-T2 occurred in an additional 16%. A negative CRM (R0) was achieved in 65% overall (98 of 150). Local recurrence occurred in 10% of those with R0 resection and 62% of those with R1-R2 resections. Distant metastases occurred in 29% of those with R0 resections and 75% of those with R1-R2 resections. The 3-year disease-free and 3-year overall survival rate was 9% and 25% and 52% and 64%, respectively, for patients with and without a histologically positive CRM.

CONCLUSION

After 5-fluorouracil-based CRT, a positive CRM predicted for a high risk of subsequent local recurrence and a 3-year disease-free survival rate of only 9%. For this reason, the CRM should be considered a major prognostic factor and should be validated in future trials as an early alternative clinical endpoint.

Preoperative radio/chemo-radiotherapy in combination with intraoperative radiotherapy for T3-4Nx rectal cancer

AIMS

To analyse the results of a single institution experience of combined preoperative radio/chemo-radiotherapy and intraoperative electron-radiation therapy (IORT) for locally advanced rectal cancer and to compare the results with surgery alone retrospectively.

METHODS

The study cohort comprised 99 patients with clinical T3-4NxM0 adenocarcinoma of the rectum who had received preoperative radio/chemo-radiotherapy, radical surgery, and IORT [Group I]. Until 1998, 67 patients were treated with radiation only [Group Ia], and after 1999, 32 patients were concurrently given tegafur and uracil (UFT) [Group Ib]. 68 patients with clinical T3-4NxM0 rectal cancer were treated with surgery alone [Group II].

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 67 months in Group I and 83 months in Group II. Local recurrence rate was 2% in Group I, which was significantly lower than 16% in Group II (p=0.002) Both disease-free survival and overall survival in Group I were significantly better than those in Group II (p=0.04, p=0.02, respectively). Sphincter preservation was possible in 78% in Group Ib, which was significantly more than 42% in Group Ia (p=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

The combined preoperative radio/chemo-radiotherapy and IORT for clinical T3-4Nx rectal cancer significantly reduces local recurrence and improves prognosis. Combination of preoperative radiotherapy and oral UFT improves the feasibility of sphincter-preservation.

Intraoperative radiotherapy: current thinking

Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) refers to the delivery of irradiation at surgery. A large single dose of irradiation is delivered to a surgically defined area, while uninvolved and dose-limiting tissues are displaced, the final goal of IORT being enhanced locoregional tumour control. IORT is used in most modern protocol studies as a boost radiation component of multidisciplinary treatment approaches. More recently, high activity radiation sources or mobile operating room treatment machines are used to facilitate the IORT procedure. Clinical experiences have shown that IORT may improve local control and disease-free survival, especially when used in adjuvant setting, combined with external beam irradiation in some neoplasms such as cancer of the stomach, pancreas, colorectum, and soft tissue sarcoma.

GP letter writing in colorectal cancer: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

The usual mode of communication with the specialist in the UK is a referral letter. Letters now primarily document the GPs' concerns for the patient and are no longer required to persuade the specialist to offer an appointment. The content of referral letters from GPs has failed to satisfy specialists responding to a series of surveys. Evidence suggests that GPs who improve their letters to specialists also refer more cases with significant pathology.

AIMS

The aims of this research are to explore the factors that may influence GPs in writing the referral letter when consulting patients presenting with lower bowel symptoms.

METHODS

A convenience sample of twelve GPs was interviewed in Nottinghamshire and inner city Sheffield practices. A framework approach was utilised in the analysis of data. Data from the interviews followed the prescribed steps, including: familiarisation, identifying a thematic framework, indexing, charting and mapping, and interpretation.

RESULTS

The thematic framework reflected four major themes. These were: (1) the nature and content of referral letters, (2) knowledge about colorectal cancer, (3) issues relating to the quality of referral letters in colorectal cases and (4) factors that effect the use of guidelines for referral.

CONCLUSIONS

GPs only have very short consultations in which to address many and complex issues. Pre-referral assessment in colorectal cases includes intimate examination of the patient. Therefore the writing of the letter of referral is often postponed until long after the patient has left the GP's office. Some GPs do not believe the consultant reads the letter of referral. However, GPs are keen to provide best care and welcome feedback about the quality of their letters. They acknowledge the responsibility to communicate with colleagues effectively and have differing ideas about what constitutes an adequate referral letter.

Intraoperative radiation therapy for curatively resected rectal cancer

PURPOSE

Intraoperative radiotherapy has been used for local control of locally advanced rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of intraoperative radiotherapy for curatively resected rectal cancer.

METHODS

Between 1982 and 1998, intraoperative radiotherapy was administered in combination with curative resection in 78 patients with adenocarcinoma of the middle or lower third of the rectum (intraoperative radiotherapy group). Sixty-two of the patients had received preoperative radiotherapy with 20 Gy. Intraoperative radiotherapy was performed by a new strategy in which an electron beam was administered as uniformly as possible to the entire dissected surface of the pelvis. Retrospective comparisons were made with 248 patients treated by surgery alone during the same period (non-intraoperative radiotherapy group).

RESULTS

The differences in tumor stage or surgical procedures between the two groups were not statistically significant. Survival, disease-free survival, and local recurrence-free survival in the intraoperative radiotherapy group were significantly more favorable than in the non-intraoperative radiotherapy group (P = 0.01, P = 0.04, and P = 0.02). Differences in survival were observed in Stage II patients but not in Stage I or Stage III patients. The local failure rate was 2.6 percent in the intraoperative radiotherapy group and 11.3 percent in the non-intraoperative radiotherapy group, and the difference was significant (P = 0.02). The distant metastasis rate was 18.0 percent in the intraoperative radiotherapy group and 19.5 percent in the non-intraoperative radiotherapy group, and the difference was not significant. There was a significantly higher rate of wound infection in the intraoperative radiotherapy group, but no infections were serious.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with adenocarcinoma of the middle or lower third of the rectum, intraoperative radiotherapy to the entire dissected surface of the pelvis reduced local recurrence in Stage II and Stage III patients and improved survival in Stage II patients.

Intraoperative radiation therapy for locally advanced recurrent rectal or rectosigmoid cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To update and summarize the experience at the Massachusetts General Hospital of a treatment program of high-dose preoperative irradiation, surgical re-resection, and intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) as a salvage treatment for patients with recurrent rectal or rectosigmoid carcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From June 1978 to February 1997, the records of 69 patients with locally recurrent rectal carcinomas or rectosigmoid carcinomas without metastases referred for consideration of IORT were reviewed. Forty-nine patients received IORT and local control and disease-free survival curves were calculated using the actuarial method of Kaplan-Meier.

RESULTS

The 5-year overall survival, local control and disease-free survival rates of 49 patients receiving IORT were 27, 35, and 20%, respectively. Thirty-four patients who underwent a macroscopic complete resection had a significantly better 5-year overall survival than the remaining 15 patients with gross residual disease (33 vs. 13%, P=0.05, log rank). For those patients, local control and disease-free survival rates were 46 and 27%, respectively. Patients with a microscopic complete resection had a superior 5-year overall survival than partially resected patients (40 vs. 14%, P=0.0001, log rank). Chemotherapy had no significant influence on overall or disease-free survival.

CONCLUSION

The current analysis shows the importance of a microscopic complete resection in a multi-modality approach with IORT for survival and local control. Salvage is rare for patients undergoing subtotal resection.

Functional and quality-of-life outcomes in patients with rectal cancer after combined modality therapy, intraoperative radiation therapy, and sphincter preservation

PURPOSE

Locally advanced primary and recurrent rectal cancers treated with external beam radiation therapy, intraoperative radiation therapy, and chemotherapy represent a complex group of patients in the setting of extensive pelvic surgery and sphincter preservation. We sought to define functional outcome and quality of life in this subset of patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed our experience with locally advanced primary and recurrent rectal cancer patients who underwent intraoperative radiation therapy with either low anterior resection (n = 12) or coloanal anastomosis (n = 6) between 1991 and 1998. Current functional outcome and quality of life were evaluated by a detailed questionnaire.

RESULTS

Median time from operation to assessment was 24 (range, 6-93) months. Using a standardized Sphincter Function Scale, incorporating the number of bowel movements per day and degree of incontinence, patients were graded as poor, fair, good, or excellent function. Of all patients, 56 percent reported unfavorable (poor or fair) function. Of the subset of patients with coloanal anastomosis or very low low anterior resection, 88 percent had unfavorable function as compared with 30 percent with standard low anterior resection. (P = 0.02; Fisher's exact probability test). A quality-of-life satisfaction score based on social, professional, and recreational restrictions demonstrated 56 percent of patients to be dissatisfied with their bowel function.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients with advanced rectal cancers who require external beam radiation therapy, extensive pelvic surgery, and intraoperative radiation therapy report unfavorable functional and quality-of-life outcomes after sphincter preservation. In this setting patients being considered for coloanal anastomosis or very low anterior resection may be better served by permanent diversion.

Intraoperative electron beam radiation therapy for locally recurrent rectal carcinoma

PURPOSE

Treatment results for locally recurrent rectal cancers are poor. This is a result of the fact that surgery is hampered due to the severance of the anatomical planes during the primary procedure and that radiotherapy is limited by normal tissue tolerance, especially after previous irradiation. This paper describes the results of a combined treatment modality in this patient group.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From 1994 to 1998, 37 patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer, but without distant metastatic disease, received a combined treatment consisting of 50.4 Gy preoperative irradiation or, in case of previous radiotherapy, 30 Gy reirradiation or no irradiation, followed by radical surgery and intraoperative electron beam radiotherapy boost.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients received a radical resection (R0), eight a microscopic irradical resection (R1), and 14 a macroscopic irradical resection (R2). The overall 3-year local control (LC), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival rates were 60%, 32%, and 58% respectively. Radicality of resection (R0/R1 vs. R2) turned out to be the significant factor for improved survival (p < 0.05), DFS (p = 0.0008), and LC (p = 0.01). Preoperative (re-)irradiation is the other significant factor in survival (p = 0.005) and DFS (p = 0.001) and was almost significant for LC (p = 0.08). After external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) a significantly higher resection rate was obtained (R0/R1 vs. R2 p = 0.001). Symptomatic peripheral local recurrences have a significantly worse prognosis and higher rate of R2-resection (p = 0.0005).

CONCLUSION

Centralization of locally recurrent rectal cancer patients enabled the development of an aggressive multimodality treatment, which in turn led to promising results. Distant failure is still a drawback.

Brachytherapy in the treatment of colorectal malignancies

By precisely delivering a single, high dose fraction of intraoperative radiation under direct visualization while excluding surrounding normal dose-limiting tissues, IORT has improved the therapeutic ratio of tumor control to morbidity. Both IOERT and HDR-IORT represent effective means of delivering this therapy, and either may be chosen with equal confidence, depending upon the facilities available, physician preference, and the clinical situation. The extraordinary efforts often required in the management of these highly selected patients is justified by the improvement achieved in the enhanced local control rates and increased cure rates. Preoperative chemoradiation therapy followed by gross total resection and IORT affords the patient the highest likelihood of local control and survival. The importance of aggressive surgery in achieving gross total resection with pathologically negative margins is reflected by the dramatic correlation reported between margin status and local control. The high complication rate associated with this multidisciplinary therapy is, no doubt, multifactorial and may be attributed to the advanced disease state at presentation and the intensive multidisciplinary treatments administered. In an effort to eradicate disease and prolong survival, many consider these elevated complication rates acceptable, particularly in light of the complexity of these cases, as well as the morbidity and mortality associated with persistent disease in the pelvis.

Indications for and results of combined modality treatment of colorectal cancer

Combined modality chemoirradiation is commonly used as a component of treatment in combination with maximum resection for both high-risk resectable and locally advanced primary or recurrent rectal cancers. With surgically resected but high-risk rectal cancers, postoperative chemoirradiation has been shown to improve both disease control (local and distant) and survival (disease-free and overall) and was recommended as standard adjuvant treatment at the 1990 National Institute of Health (NIH) Consensus Conference on Adjuvant treatment for patients with rectal and colon cancers. Subsequent intergroup trials are being conducted to help define optimal combinations of postoperative chemoirradiation for resected high-risk rectal cancers and to test sequencing issues of preoperative versus postoperative chemoirradiation. With locally unresectable primary or recurrent colorectal cancers, standard therapy with surgery, external beam irradiation (EBRT) and chemotherapy is often unsuccessful. When intraoperative electron irradiation (IOERT) is combined with standard treatment, local control and survival appear to be improved in separate analyses from the Mayo Clinic and the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH). However, routine use of systemic therapy is also needed as a component of treatment, in view of high rates of systemic failure.

Results of external beam radiotherapy alone for incompletely resected carcinoma of rectosigmoid or rectum: Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute experience 1981-1990

PURPOSE

To study the results of external beam radiotherapy treatment for incompletely resected nonmetastatic rectosigmoid and rectal carcinoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A retrospective review was carried out of all patients (57) presenting to Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute from 1981 to 1990 with incompletely resected nonmetastatic rectosigmoid or rectal cancer who were treated with external beam radiotherapy. Three radiotherapy schedules were used: radical (50 to 60 Gy, 27 patients), high-dose palliative (45 Gy, 25 patients), and low-dose palliative (less than 45 Gy, 5 patients). Symptomatic response, overall survival, and the effect of prognostic factors on treatment outcome were evaluated. The median follow-up period for survivors was 49 months.

RESULTS

Symptomatic response rates were 83% and 79% for the radical and high-dose palliative groups respectively. The estimated median survival time from presentation for all patients was 16.4 months (radical 26.1 months, high-dose palliative 15.7 months). Patients with microscopic residual disease survived significantly longer than patients with macroscopic residual disease (estimated median survival time 30.7 months vs. 14.3 months, p = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

No dose response effect was seen between the radical group and high-dose palliative group. Microscopic residual disease at presentation was the only significant predictor of better survival. The conventionally fractionated course of 50 to 60 Gy was not significantly better in terms of palliation and overall survival than a shorter palliative course of 45 Gy. In future, preoperative chemoradiation should improve outcome by reducing the number of patients with incompletely resected cancer.

[Locoregional recurrence of adenocarcinomas of the rectum treated with irradiation combined with or without excision surgery]

PURPOSE

Retrospective study to analyze the results of external beam radiation treatment with or without surgery for loco-regional recurrence of adenocarcinoma of the rectum following previous surgery without pre- or post-operative radiotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between March 1973 and November 1991, 211 patients with loco-regional recurrence of rectum cancer were treated with external beam radiation treatment. Radical surgery was the only initial treatment modality. Surgical resection of local recurrence was done in 36 patients and only 17 patients could undergo complete resection. Forty-seven patients underwent radiotherapy (RT) combined with surgery and 164 received external beam radiation treatment alone to a mean total dose of 46 Gy.

RESULTS

Among the 151 patients whose recurrence was revealed by pain, 64 (42%) were considered to have a complete symptomatic response after loco-regional treatment with radiosurgery or RT alone. The mean duration of response was 12 months. The 3-year overall survival rate was 16%. Five prognostic factors decreased the overall survival rate in multivariate analysis: high age, sex (male), concomitant distant metastasis, no tumor resection, and low total radiation dose with external beam radiation treatment alone. The 3-year overall survival rate for patients with completely resected recurrences was 39%.

CONCLUSION

External beam RT treatment can only be considered a palliative symptomatic treatment. New techniques of early detection of local recurrence and new combined modalities approaches (radiation sensitizers or intra-operative radiotherapy) with surgical resection in some favorable cases should be studied.

Moderate dose intraoperative and external beam radiotherapy for locally recurrent rectal carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Late adverse effects (i.e. neuropathy, chronic bowel obstruction) limit the effective dose given in intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Initial results of a multi-modality treatment approach using moderate dose IORT and moderate dose EBRT are presented.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-one consecutive patients with recurrent rectal carcinomas had IORT and EBRT after complete (R0, n = 14) or incomplete resection (R1, n = 9; R2, n = 8). The mean [ORT dose was 13.7 Gy (range 12-20 Gy) supplemented with an EBRT dose of 41.4 Gy. Twenty-two patients had preoperative EBRT and 22 patients had concomitant chemotherapy (5-FU, Leucovorine).

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 28 months, 16 patients had re-recurrent disease and 11 patients had died. Nine patients failed locally (four in-field, four marginal and one anastomotic re-recurrence), three combined with distant metastasis, resulting in overall and IORT infield local control rates of 71% and 87%, respectively. Distant metastases alone were found in seven patients. The 4-year overall and relapse-free survival rates were 58% and 48%, respectively. After incomplete resection the local failure rate increased (R0 21%, R1/2 35%) and the 4-year relapse-free survival rate decreased significantly (29% versus 71%) due to a markedly increased distant metastasis rate (53% versus 7%). Acute and late toxicities were not increased.

CONCLUSION

The combination of moderate dose IORT and EBRT is a safe and efficacious component in a multi-modality treatment approach.

High dose rate intraoperative radiation therapy (HDR-IORT) as part of the management strategy for locally advanced primary and recurrent rectal cancer

PURPOSE

Primary unresectable and locally advanced recurrent rectal cancer presents a significant clinical challenge. Local failure rates are high in both situations. Under such circumstances, there is a significant need to safely deliver tumoricidal doses of radiation in an attempt to improve local control. For this reason, we have incorporated a new approach utilizing high dose rate intraoperative radiation therapy (HDR-IORT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 11/92-12/96, a total of 112 patients were explored, of which 68 patients were treated with HDR-IORT, and 66 are evaluable. The majority of the 44 patients were excluded for unresectable disease or for distant metastases which eluded preoperative imaging. There were 22 patients with primary unresectable disease, and 46 patients who presented with recurrent disease. The histology was adenocarcinoma in 64 patients, and squamous cell carcinoma in four patients. In general, the patients with primary unresectable disease received preoperative chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin, and external beam irradiation to 4500-5040 cGy, followed by surgical resection and HDR-IORT (1000-2000 cGy). In general, the patients with recurrent disease were treated with surgical resection and HDR-IORT (1000-2000 cGy) alone. All surgical procedures were done in a dedicated operating room in the brachytherapy suite, so that HDR-IORT could be delivered using the Harrison-Anderson-Mick (HAM) applicator. The median follow-up is 17.5 months (1-48 mo).

RESULTS

In primary cases, the actuarial 2-year local control is 81%. For patients with negative margins, the local control was 92% vs. 38% for those with positive margins (p = 0.002). The 2-year actuarial disease-free survival was 69%; 77% for patients with negative margins vs. 38% for patients with positive margins (p = 0.03). For patients with recurrent disease, the 2-year actuarial local control rate was 63%. For patients with negative margins, it was 82%, while it was 19% for those with positive margins (p = 0.02). The disease-free survival was 47% (71% for negative margins and 0% for positive margins) (p = 0.04). Prospective data gathering indicated that significant complications occurred in approximately 38% of patients and were multifactorial in nature, and manageable to complete recovery.

CONCLUSION

HDR-IORT using our technique is versatile, safe, and effective. The local control rates for primary disease compare quite well with other published series, especially for patients with negative margins. For patients with recurrent disease, locoregional control and survival are especially encouraging in patients with negative resection margins. Further follow-up is needed to see whether these encouraging data will continue.

Use of neutron therapy in the management of locally advanced nonresectable primary or recurrent rectal cancer

Inoperable locally advanced or inoperable recurrent rectal cancer is a difficult problem. Tenesmus, discharge, bleeding and pelvic pain are frequently present and often are associated with infiltration of the sacral plexus. The value of radiotherapy in managing such patients is being appreciated, although up to 40% of the treated patients have no symptomatic response. Improvement in tumor response and control has been scored through efforts to overcome the radio resistance of the hypoxic tumor cells by neutron irradiation. This article is an account of the activity of neutron radiotherapy in such patients. Over 350 patients were entered in studies comparing neutrons used alone and neutrons used in a mixed-beam treatment schedule. At present no therapeutic gain for long-lasting survival has been achieved; however, local control and pain improvement seems to be better with neutrons than with photons.

Use of brachytherapy in management of locally recurrent rectal cancer

PURPOSE

Locally recurrent rectal cancer is associated with poor quality of life and has justified aggressive surgical and adjuvant approaches to control the disease. This study was designed to evaluate if the use of brachytherapy in association with wide surgical excision (debulking operation) can offer reasonable palliation for patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with biopsy-proven locally recurrent rectal cancer who were not candidates for intraoperative radiation therapy and who were previously considered as having unresectable tumors were included in the study and were followed-up from May 1981 to November 1990. All of them had undergone laparotomy and had either radical or debulking surgical resection performed. At the same time, brachytherapy was used with temporary or permanent implant of seeds of iridium-192 or iodine-125.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were included. Patients ranged in age from 28 to 74 years, and 16 patients were female. No mortality was observed, and morbidity was low (small-bowel obstruction (1 patient), intestinal fistula (1 patient), and urinary fistula (1 patient). Histologic examination of the specimen showed gross residual disease in 67 percent of patients and microscopic disease in 25 percent of patients. Long-term follow-up was possible in 28 patients. Mean follow-up and local control were, respectively, 26.5 months and 37.5 percent for gross residual disease and 34 months and 66 percent for microscopic residual disease. Eighteen patients (64 percent) had locally recurrent rectal cancer under control at the time of the last follow-up, with seven patients (25 percent) having no evidence of local or distant recurrence.

CONCLUSION

This is the first report of brachytherapy for locally recurrent rectal cancer. This appears to offer a therapeutic alternative to patients who are not candidates for intraoperative radiation therapy. Surgical morbidity and mortality are acceptable. Local control in 18 patients (64 percent) is comparable with intraoperative radiation therapy or more morbid surgical alternatives. Cancer-related deaths are most often related to disseminated disease, which suggests the need for systemic therapy in addition to brachytherapy.

Aggressive multimodality treatment for locally advanced irresectable rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Local failure rates are high for locally irresectable primary or recurrent colorectal cancer, even when chemoradiation therapy is employed.

AIM

This review evaluates evidence supporting aggressive preoperative chemoradiation followed by maximal surgical resection and intraoperative radiation therapy to achieve disease control and cure for patients with locally advanced irresectable primary or recurrent rectal cancer.

RESULTS

A 5-year survival rate of 42 per cent with a central failure rate of 2 per cent may be achieved in patients with locally irresectable primary rectal cancer. In patients with locally recurrent disease, these values at 5 years are 18 and 28 per cent respectively. The 5-year incidence of distant metastasis remains high, affecting 64 per cent of patients with primary cancer and 75 per cent of those with recurrent cancer.

CONCLUSION

A disease-free surgical resection margin remains paramount to achieve cure. Encouraging trends exist, however, for further evaluation of multimodality therapy as a means of reducing local recurrence of disease.

Treatment of colorectal cancer. Current guidelines and future prospects for drug therapy

Colorectal carcinoma is one of the most common cancers in Western countries (yearly incidence rate of 1:3000), and represents, after lung cancer, the second leading cause of deaths due to cancer. During the past decades, knowledge about this carcinoma has considerably increased, but little progress has been made in improvement in patient survival. At least 40% of patients with colorectal cancer will have metastases sometime during the course of their illness. In colon cancer, the first therapeutic approach is surgery, but the important role of adjuvant chemotherapy in these patients, in terms of disease-free survival and overall survival benefit, is now well established. Until today, standard therapy was represented by fluorouracil plus levamisole and/or calcium folinate (folinic acid). Other strategies are represented by monoclonal antibodies (mAb), which improve survival, (with a decrease in mortality by 32%), and by portal vein fluorouracil, alone or in combination with systemic therapy. In rectal cancer, the best results have been obtained with a combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy. In advanced colorectal cancer, a standard treatment has not yet been established. This disease is usually considered as poorly chemosensitive and for more than 30 years fluorouracil has been the standard drug. Tumour response rates (partial+complete) for patients treated with bolus intravenous fluorouracil are 10 to 15%, with a median survival about 1 year. Many attempts have been made to improve these results. Biochemical modulation of fluorouracil is one of the most interesting strategies developed in the last few years in an attempt to increase the therapeutic index of this compound. Another way has been to administer fluorouracil by continuous infusion. Further innovative compounds such as irinotecan and raltitrexed are now being evaluated in clinical trials. Preliminary data from phase II and III studies have provided encouraging results on the use of these new drugs. In metastatic disease confined to the liver, the possibility of locoregional therapy through implantable pumps should be taken into consideration.

Locally advanced primary colorectal cancer: intraoperative electron and external beam irradiation +/- 5-FU

PURPOSE

For locally advanced primary colorectal cancer, our institution has combined intraoperative electron irradiation (IOERT) with external beam irradiation (EBRT) +/- 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and surgical resection. Disease control and survival were compared with the current IOERT and prior non-IOERT regimens.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From April 1981 through August 1995, 61 patients received an IOERT dose of 10-20 Gy, usually combined with 45-55 Gy of fractionated EBRT; 56 had minimum follow-up of 18 months. The amount of residual disease remaining at IOERT after exploration and maximal resection in the 56 patients was gross in 16, < or = microscopic in 39, and unresected in 1.

RESULTS

Survival (SR) and disease control were analyzed as a function of potential prognostic factors. Factors that achieved statistical significance for improved overall survival included treatment sequence of preop EBRT + 5-FU (vs. postoperative EBRT + 5-FU, p = 0.003) and < or = microscopic residual disease after maximal resection (vs. gross residual, p = 0.005). Those that appeared to favorably impact disease-free survival included EBRT + 5-FU (vs. EBRT alone, p = 0.01), < or = microscopic residual (vs. gross, p = 0.0014), and colon site of primary (vs. rectum, p = 0.009). Failures within an irradiation field have occurred in 4 of 16 patients (25%) who presented with gross residual after partial resection vs. 2 of 39 (5%) with < or = microscopic residual after gross total resection (p = 0.01). The significant prognostic factors for a decrease in distant metastases were the same as for disease-free SR with respective p-values of 0.013 (EBRT + 5-FU), 0.008 (microscopic residual), and 0.03 (colon primary). The current data suggests a relationship between IOERT dose and incidence of Grade 2 or 3 neuropathy (< or = 12.5 Gy--1 of 29 or 3%, > or = 15 Gy--6 of 26 or 23%, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Both overall survival and disease control appear to be improved with the addition of IOERT to standard treatment. More routine use of systemic therapy is indicated as a component of IOERT containing treatment regimens because the incidence of distant metastases was 50% of patients at risk.

Intraoperative electron and external beam irradiation with or without 5-fluorouracil and maximum surgical resection for previously unirradiated, locally recurrent colorectal cancer

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE

1) Disease control and survival will be evaluated for treatment regimens containing intraoperative electron irradiation (IOERT) for locally recurrent, previously unirradiated colorectal cancers. 2) Various prognostic factors will be evaluated to determine whether they have an impact on disease control or survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From April 1981 through August 1995, 123 patients with previously unirradiated locally recurrent colorectal cancers received IOERT at our institution, usually as a supplement to external beam irradiation (EBRT) and maximum resection. All received EBRT with or without concomitant 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. Forty-five Gy in 25 fractions was given to the tumor or tumor bed plus 3-cm to 5-cm margins in 121 of 123 patients and a boost of 5.4 to 9 Gy in 3 to 5 fractions to the tumor plus 2-cm margins. Maximum resection was performed before or after EBRT. IOERT doses ranged from 10 to 20 Gy in 119 of 123 patients, with dose dependent on resection margins (130 fields in 123 patients). Maintenance chemotherapy was given to only two patients.

RESULTS

Disease relapse and survival were evaluated. Central failure (within the IOERT field) was documented in 13 of 123 patients (11 percent) with a five-year actuarial rate of 26 percent. Local relapse (in EBRT field) occurred in 24 patients (20 percent); five-year rate was 37 percent. Distant metastases occurred in 66 patients (54 percent); five-year rate was 72 percent. Median survival was 28 months, with overall survival at two, three, and five years of 62, 39, and 20 percent, respectively. Tolerance data suggest a relationship between IOERT dose and incidence of Grade 2 or 3 neuropathy (< or = 12.5 Gy, 2 of 29 or 7 percent; > or = 15 Gy, 19 of 101 or 19 percent; P = 0.12). Survival and disease control were analyzed as a function of potential prognostic factors. None of the prognostic factors had a significant impact on disease control or survival. Although there was a trend for reduction in local relapse rates with gross total vs. partial resection, this neither achieved statistical significance nor translated into improved survival. Patients with gross residual disease after maximum resection had three-year and five-year survival rates of 36 and 18 percent, respectively, which paralleled results for patients with gross total resection at 41 and 24 percent, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Encouraging trends for improved local control with or without survival exist in separate locally recurrent colorectal IOERT analyses from our institution and other institutions. Therefore, continued evaluation of IOERT approaches seems warranted. Disease control within the IOERT and external fields is decreased when the surgeon is unable to accomplish a gross total resection. Therefore, it is reasonable to consistently add 5-fluorouracil or other dose modifiers during EBRT and to evaluate the use of dose modifiers in conjunction with IOERT (sensitizers and hyperthermia). In view of high systemic failure rates of > 50 percent in patients with locally recurrent disease, more routine use of systemic therapy is indicated as a component of IOERT-containing treatment regimens (use existent chemotherapy and/or develop effective immunotherapy and gene transfer therapy). Even with locally recurrent lesions, the aggressive multimodality approaches including IOERT have resulted in improved local control and long-term survival rates of 20 percent vs. an expected 5 percent with conventional techniques.

Recurrences of rectal cancers: results of a multimodal approach with intraoperative radiation therapy. French Group of IORT. Intraoperative Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE

Prognosis of recurrent rectal cancer remains poor, mainly because of the difficulties of achieving a satisfactory local control. Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) allows for the delivery of a complementary single dose to the tumor residues or to the tumor bed and could be useful jn a multimodal treatment. In an attempt to evaluate this interest, a retrospective analysis of patients treated with IORT in six French hospitals has been performed.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Data have been collected in 73 patients (41 men), with a mean age of 62 years, treated with IORT. Initial rectal tumors were large (mean diameter: 45 mm), partially or totally fixed to the contiguous structures in 39%, and with nodal involvement in 50% of the cases. Initial surgery had been a sphincter-sparing surgery in 67%; external radiation therapy had been delivered in 52%, and a chemotherapy had been given in 10% of the patients. Recurrences were isolated (without metastases) in 86%, and were posterior or posterolateral in 55% of the cases. Surgery allowed for a complete macroscopical resection in 57%, a partial resection with gross residual disease in 29%, and no resection in 14% of the recurrences. Intraoperative radiation therapy was delivered in a dose of 10 to 25 Gy (mean 18.5) through localizators of a mean diameter of 75 mm (60 to 110). External radiation therapy, either preoperative or postoperatively was given to 30 patients without prior radiation therapy. Ten patients received additional chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil.

RESULTS

Four postoperative deaths occurred. Postoperative morbidity occurred in 16 patients and some complications were probably related to the IORT procedure. Four long-term complications were observed. Overall actuarial survival occurred in 72.4% of the patients at 1 year, in 44.6% at 2 years, and in 30.6% at 3 years. Twenty-one local failures have been observed. Actuarial local control occurred in 71.3% of the patients at 1 year, 47.7% at 2 years, and 31.3% at 3 years.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative radiation therapy is a complementary treatment for recurrences of rectal cancer. It provides encouraging results, particularly in some selected situations, when patients have not previously been treated with external radiation therapy. Further studies of multimodal treatments are necessary.

Preoperative and postoperative radiotherapy in rectal carcinoma

Surgery is the initial treatment of choice for most patients with rectal neoplasms. The objectives are to remove of tumor and drain the primary nodes. In stage I disease the surgical approach is though to be sufficiently effective. However, at least in the case of abdominoperineal resection, this causes considerable morbidity. Therefore, at the present time, there are efforts to reduce the extent of the resection by applying other treatment modalities in stage I disease. After curative resection in stage II/III disease a considerable number of patients suffer from local recurrence or distant metastases. In these patients adjuvant therapy is currently recommended. In locally advanced disease, primary resection is not feasible. Different treatment settings which apply combinations of all treatment modalities are possible. The article reviews the literature and shows future directions.

Sacropelvic resection and intraoperative electron irradiation in the management of recurrent anorectal cancer

PURPOSE

To provide local control and palliation of pain, a multimodal ity approach, including external beam radiation therapy, surgical resection, and intraoperative electron irradiation (IOERT), has been used for patients with locally advanced anal or recurrent rectal cancers involving the sacrum.

METHODS

Sixteen consecutive patients (11 males; 5 females; ages, 44-76) underwent surgical exploration, sacrectomy, and IOERT, between 1990 and 1994.

RESULTS

Proximal extent of resection was S2-3 in four patients, S3-4 in five, and S4-5 in five. Two patients had resection of the anterior table of the sacrum. Margins were clear in 11, close in 3, and microscopically involved in 2 patients. Operative times ranged from 6 to 17 (median, 12.5) hours, and blood loss ranged from 300 to 12,600 (median, 3,350) ml. No operative deaths resulted. Major postoperative complications occurred in eight patients (50 percent): posterior wound infections and dehiscence, urinary leak, and ileal fistula. Five (31 percent) and 3 (19 percent) patients developed no or minor complications, respectively. Intensive Care Unit stay was one night for all patients, and overall hospital stay ranged from 11 to 30 (median, 16.5) days. Follow-up was available on all 16 patients. Kaplan-Meier survival was 68 percent at one year and 48 percent at two years. At the time of analysis, 9 of 16 patients were alive. Of the nine alive patients who responded to a questionnaire, eight reported a reduction in pain and improved quality of life postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Sacropelvic resection, in conjunction with IOERT, provides palliation and offers potential for cure in patients with locally advanced or recurrent anorectal cancer.

Intraoperative electron beam radiation therapy: technique, dosimetry, and dose specification: report of task force 48 of the Radiation Therapy Committee, American Association of Physicists in Medicine

Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) is a treatment modality whereby a large single dose of radiation is delivered to a surgically open, exposed cancer site. Typically, a beam of megavoltage electrons is directed at an exposed tumor or tumor bed through a specially designed applicator system. In the last few years, IORT facilities have proliferated around the world. The IORT technique and the applicator systems used at these facilities vary greatly in sophistication and design philosophy. The IORT beam characteristics vary for different designs of applicator systems. It is necessary to document the existing techniques of IORT, to detail the dosimetry data required for accurate delivery of the prescribed dose, and to have a uniform method of dose specification for cooperative clinical trials. The specific charge to the task group includes the following: (a) identify the multidisciplinary IORT team, (b) outline special considerations that must be addressed by an IORT program, (c) review currently available IORT techniques, (d) describe dosimetric measurements necessary for accurate delivery of prescribed dose, (e) describe dosimetric measurements necessary in documenting doses to the surrounding normal tissues, (f) recommend quality assurance procedures for IORT, (g) review methods of treatment documentation and verification, and (h) recommend methods of dose specification and recording for cooperative clinical trials.

External beam plus intraoperative irradiation for gastrointestinal cancers

Although useful palliation can often be achieved when external beam irradiation and chemotherapy are used to treat locally advanced gastrointestinal malignancies, local control and long-term survival are infrequent in view of the limited tolerance of surrounding organs and tissues. In view of dose limitations of external beam irradiation, intraoperative irradiation (IORT) with electrons has been used as a supplement to external treatment in an attempt to improve the therapeutic ratio of local control versus complications. An IORT dose of 10 to 20 Gy has been combined with fractionated external beam doses of 45 to 55 Gy in 1.8 Gy fractions in studies performed in the United States, Japan, Europe, and Scandinavian countries. In this paper the indications for and the results of aggressive combined techniques that include IORT are discussed. Results obtained with external beam techniques alone or with chemotherapy and resection are presented by site to demonstrate the need for higher doses of irradiation. When results from IORT series are compared to standard treatment with regard to disease control and survival, local control appears better with locally advanced colorectal, gastric, and pancreatic cancer; and survival appears better with colorectal +/- biliary cancers. With pancreatic cancer, improvements in local control do not translate into increased survival in view of the high incidence of subsequent liver and peritoneal failures. Implications for future strategies in all sites are discussed.

Intraoperative irradiation after palliative surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

In patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer, long-term disease control and survival is uncommon with single-modality therapy. This report evaluates results achieved at the Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN) with single- or combined-modality treatment, including intraoperative irradiation.

METHODS

From 1981 to 1988, 106 patients underwent palliative surgical resections at the Mayo Clinic for locally recurrent rectal cancer. None had evidence of extrapelvic disease, and 42 received intraoperative electron beam irradiation (IORT) as a component of treatment. Gross residual disease remained after maximal surgical resection in 34 of the 42 patients and 61 of the patients who did not receive IORT. The IORT dose was 15-20 Gy in 39 patients and 10, 25, and 30 Gy in the other 3. External beam irradiation (EBRT) was administered to 41 of the 42 patients (doses > or = 45 Gy to 38 patients).

RESULTS

Kaplan-Meier survival estimates at 3 and 5 years were analyzed for the 106 patients. Palliative surgical resection alone (12 patients) resulted in a 3-year survival of 8% and a 5-year survival of 0%. Statistically significant factors relative to survival based on the univariate analysis of all patients included amount of residual tumor (microscopic vs. gross, P = 0.032) treatment method (P = 0.005), IORT versus no IORT (P = 0.0006), type of symptoms (P = 0.0075), type of fixation (P < 0.0001), and preoperative Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status (P = 0.03). For patients who received IORT, 3-year survival with gross residual tumor or presentation with pain was 44% and 43%, respectively. Factors not associated with survival (univariate) included extended versus conventional surgical resection, grade, age, and sex. The 3-year cumulative probability of distant metastasis was 60% in the patients who received IORT and 54% in those who did not. The 3-year local relapse rates were 40% versus 93% in patients who received IORT versus those who did not.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the addition of IORT to external irradiation and maximal surgical resection appears to improve local tumor control and survival in patients who undergo palliative surgical resection for locally recurrent rectal cancer, further gains in treatment are necessary. Considering the high rates of distant metastasis, more routine systemic therapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) leucovorin, 5-FU levamisole, or all three needs to be incorporated into aggressive treatment approaches. In patients with gross residual tumor after maximum surgical resection, local tumor control is inadequate despite treatment combinations including IORT. The evaluation of radiation sensitizers or biologic modifiers during external irradiation and IORT is indicated.

Experimental and clinical studies of intraoperative radiation therapy

Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) is an innovative treatment modality that has recently been given considerable attention as an approach toward controlling various locally advanced cancers. IORT involves surgical extirpation or debulking of the malignant lesion and the delivery of a large single dose of radiation to the tumor bed or to residual disease. This strategy allows for a theoretical enhancement of the therapeutic effect of radiation for three reasons: (1) the biologic effectiveness of a single large radiation dose is higher than for the same dose given in a fractionated regimen; (2) the dose of radiation is precisely given to the area at greatest risk of tumor recurrence (or persistence); and (3) irradiation of dose-limiting normal tissues may be avoided by operative mobilization of the tissues from the treatment volume by customized lead shielding of anatomically fixed structures or by judicious choice of electron beam energies or use of a bolus to limit dose to deep structures. Electrons are generally used for IORT because of sharp dose falloff. This avoids potential toxic effects to normal structures that may lie deep to the treatment volume. Conventional external beam photon radiation therapy (EBRT) allows less accurate tumor volume delineation (even with sophisticated treatment planning technique) and dose limitations necessitated by normal tissues incidentally in the treatment volume. A considerable amount of experimental and clinical data are available on the acute and late effects of IORT on normal tissues. Dose tolerances of many organs have been described in large animal models, and clinical toxicities are evident in several trials. Clinical IORT treatments are provided in more than 250 U.S. and foreign centers at the present time. Given the current interest in IORT, this monograph will review IORT methods and experimental and clinical results with emphasis on its present and future role for locally advanced cancers.

Intra-operative radiation therapy for malignant brain tumors: rationale, method, and treatment results of cerebral glioblastomas

In radiation therapy for malignant brain tumours, the dose of radiation that can be safely delivered to a tumour is limited by the radiation tolerance of the adjacent normal brain tissue. Among various radiation modalities to produce local tumour eradication without unacceptable complications, we chose a large, single irradiation dose during the operation (intra-operative radiation therapy, IORT). In contrast to X-ray or Cobalt-60 gamma ray irradiation, IORT with a high-energy electron beam delivered by the Shimadzu 20 MeV betatron provides acceptable dose homogeneity with rapid fall-off of the radiation dose beyond the treatment volume. Thus, IORT has the advantage of precise demarcation of the target volume, minimum damage to surrounding normal tissues, and a high absorbed target dose (15-25 Gy in 5-10 min). On the basis of our experience with 170 patients treated by IORT, we established the treatment indications and method in patients with malignant brain tumours. IORT with a dose of 15-25 Gy was delivered to widely resected tumours followed by external radiation therapy. No acute or subacute complications were observed. Treatment results of 30 patients with glioblastoma treated by IORT (mean 18.3 Gy) combined with external radiation therapy (mean 58.5 Gy) resulted in a median survival of 119 weeks and a 2-year survival rate of 61%.

The influence of surgical margins on advanced cancer treated with intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) and surgical resection

Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) has been used successfully in the treatment of malignancies, alone and as an adjunct to surgical resection. This study examined a single institution's experience with combined IORT and surgical resection in the treatment of advanced cancer. The records of 41 consecutive patients undergoing intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) at the Fox Chase Cancer Center, from July 1987 through March 1990, were retrospectively reviewed. All patients had locally advanced disease, of whom 73% had failed previous multimodality therapy and 44% had undergone prior radiation therapy (XRT). The 2-year actuarial survival for the entire cohort was 72%. Disease-free survival was 47% at 1 year and 5% at 2 years. The only important prognostic factor predicting outcome was status of the surgical margin. Positive surgical margins decreased the 2-year actuarial survival from 100% to 59%, and increased the local failure rate from 21% to 52%. Margin status had no effect on the later development of metastatic disease. Higher IORT doses, field sizes > 7 cm, and multiple IORT fields were used for larger tumors and larger amounts of residual disease. These parameters alone did not correlate with improved local control. This analysis suggests the usefulness of aggressive surgical resection with IORT in extending survival for locally advanced or recurrent cancer. Negative margin status is the best predictor of a favorable outcome and should be used to select patients who may benefit from IORT. The use of radiation sensitizing agents should be explored in patients with positive margins, since in-field failure continues to be the major pattern of failure. IORT in conjunction with aggressive surgical resection should continue to be studied in prospective randomized clinical trials.

External beam and intraoperative electron irradiation for locally advanced soft tissue sarcomas

PURPOSE

Intraoperative irradiation with electrons was used in conjunction with external beam irradiation and maximal surgical resection in 20 patients with locally advanced soft tissue sarcomas or desmoids. This manuscript presents results with regard to tolerance of treatment and its impact on tumor control and survival.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Ten patients presented with previously untreated primary sarcomas and 10 at the time of local recurrence (two had recurrent desmoid tumors). Tumor location was retroperitoneal in 19 and in the low anterior neck in one. A partial or gross total resection was performed prior to the external beam or intraoperative component of irradiation in every patient, but all had positive resection margins. Patients received 4500-6000 cGy of fractionated, external beam irradiation and an IORT dose of 1000-2000 cGy. Chemotherapy was given only at the time of disease progression.

RESULTS

Fourteen of 20 patients (70%) were alive; 11 (55%) were free of disease (4/10 primary, 7/10 recurrent), but 1 required hemipelvectomy for salvage. Progression within the intraoperative irradiation field was documented in only 1 patient (5%) and within the external beam field in 3/20 (15%). Blood born distant metastasis occurred in 5 patients (25%) and peritoneal seeding in 1 (5%). The distant failure incidence by grade was 1/8 (13%) for Grades 1, 2 and 5/12 (42%) for Grades 3, 4. Only 1 patient (5%) developed a > or = severe neuropathy, and small bowel obstruction requiring exploration also occurred in a single patient.

CONCLUSION

In view of acceptable tolerance and the high current rate of local tumor control, in spite of incomplete surgical resections, further evaluation of intraoperative irradiation as a component of treatment is indicated for locally advanced primary and recurrent soft tissue sarcomas.

Determination of the optimal dose of 5-fluorouracil when combined with low dose D,L-leucovorin and irradiation in rectal cancer: results of three consecutive phase II studies. EORTC Radiotherapy Group

In three consecutive phase II trials, 5-fluorouracil (5FU)-low dose leucovorin (20 mg/m2/day) was delivered in two 5-day courses during the first (d1 to d5) and the last (d29 to d33) week of a limited pelvic irradiation (45 Gy, 5 weeks, 25 fractions) in patients with locally extended rectal cancer. The three trials differed only by the 5FU dose in the chemotherapy (CT) schemes. In trial 1 (first CT course 5FU dose 425 mg/m2/day, second CT course 370 mg/m2/day), 16 patients were included. 5 patients suffered a grade 3+ toxicity and the compliance was 63%. In trial 2 (first and second CT course 5FU dose 370 mg/m2/day), 53 patients were included. 5 patients suffered a grade 3+ toxicity. The compliance was 94%. In the trial 3 (first and second CT course 5FU dose 350 mg/m2/day), 16 patients were included. 1 patient suffered a grade 3 toxicity and the compliance was 100%. The overall response rate (complete and partial responses) of local disease and distant metastasis were 87 and 7%, respectively. 43 patients were operated on after a mean delay of 8 weeks. Among the 41 macroscopic complete resections, 6 (14.6%) were sterilised and 12 (29.3%) were classified Asler-Coller A/B1. Regression curve analysis using either grade 3+ toxicity or incomplete treatment as an end point against the 5FU dose indicates that a 350 mg/m2/day 5FU dose is advisable for a phase III adjuvant multicentre trial.

Radiation therapy for advanced colorectal cancer

Locally advanced, inoperable, and recurrent colorectal cancer requires multitechnique therapy to achieve optimal control and palliation. The role of radiation therapy as an adjuvant in resectable rectal cancer has been studied extensively in clinical trials, but its role in more advanced disease has not been explored to the same extent. The use of radiation in colonic rather than rectal cancer is more problematic because of natural tissue tolerance constraints in the abdomen versus the pelvis. The current and past role of radiation in advanced colorectal cancer will be reviewed, and avenues of ongoing and future investigation will be outlined. The role of radiation for palliation also will be discussed.

The role of intra-operative irradiation in locally advanced primary and recurrent rectal adenocarcinoma

Useful palliation can often be achieved when standard treatment approaches of external beam irradiation and chemotherapy with or without resection are used for locally advanced primary rectal malignancies. Local control and long-term survival are achieved in only 10% to 50% of patients, however, due to the limited irradiation tolerance of surrounding organs and tissues. Encouraging trends exist in separate intra-operative irradiation analyses from Massachusetts General Hospital and Mayo Clinic with regard to improvement in local control and possibly survival of locally advanced rectal lesions, warranting continued evaluation of such approaches. Disease control within the intra-operative and external irradiation field is decreased, however, when the surgeon is unable to accomplish gross total resection. Therefore it seems reasonable to consistently add 5-Fluorouracil with or without Leucovorin during external irradiation and to evaluate the use of dose modifiers, such as sensitizers or hyperthermia, in conjunction with intra-operative irradiation. Since high systemic failure rates exist with both locally advanced primary and recurrent lesions, more effective chemotherapy needs to be evaluated during external irradiation as well as after completion of such. In view of survival advantages with 5-Fluorouracil plus Leucovorin versus 5-Fluorouracil alone for metastatic disease, this regimen is currently being employed. Even with locally recurrent lesions, the aggressive multimodality approaches including intra-operative irradiation have resulted in improved local control, and long-term survival rates of 20% to 25% versus an expected 5% with conventional techniques in historical series.

Incompletely resected rectum, recto-sigmoid, or sigmoid carcinoma: results of postoperative radiotherapy and prognostic factors

Postoperative radiotherapy was given in 40 patients with gross or microscopic pathologically proven residual disease after surgical resection of rectum, recto-sigmoid, or sigmoid carcinoma. The radiotherapy target volume included the pelvis with (9 patients) or without (31 patients) the perineum. Median total dose of radiation was 50 Gy (range 30-60). One patient received 30 Gy, 10 received greater than 30 to 40 Gy, 13 received greater than 40 to 50 Gy, and 16 patients received greater than 50 to 60 Gy. The median follow-up in the survivors (16 patients) was 53 months (range: 16-85). Probability of survival with censoring for death due to intercurrent disease was 36% at 5 years. Survival for patients with microscopic residual disease (21 patients) was 40% at 5 years compared to 12% for those with gross residual disease (19 patients) (p = 0.09). Twenty-five patients relapsed. All but one relapse occurred earlier than 50 months after radiotherapy. Approximately half (12/25) of the relapses were observed within 6 months after radiotherapy. Local relapse inside the radiotherapy portals was observed in 9/40 (22%) patients. Therapy-related urogenital complications occurred in no patient and gastro-intestinal complications in three patients (7%). In one patient they were scored WHO grade 4 and in two patients WHO grade 3. Prognostic factors were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards model. For survival differentiation, grade (p less than 0.001), stage (p = 0.04), and perineal irradiation (p = 0.03) were independent prognostic factors. With relapse-free survival as the endpoint, only stage (p = 0.003) was a statistically significant prognostic factor. There was a trend toward a better relapse-free survival when the perineum was included in the radiation portals (p = 0.09).

Intraoperative electron beam radiation therapy for recurrent locally advanced rectal or rectosigmoid carcinoma

A multimodality approach of moderate-dose to high-dose preoperative radiation therapy, surgical resection, and intraoperative electron beam radiation therapy (IORT) has been used for patients with locally recurrent rectal or rectosigmoid carcinoma. The 5-year actuarial local control and disease-free survival for 30 patients undergoing this treatment program were 26% and 19%, respectively. The most important factor predicting a favorable outcome was complete resection with negative pathologic resection margins. The determinant local control and disease-free survival for 13 patients undergoing complete resection were 62% and 54%, respectively, whereas for 17 patients undergoing partial resection these figures were 18% and 6%, respectively. There did not appear to be a difference in local control or survival based on the original surgical resection (abdominoperineal resection versus low anterior resection). However, the likelihood of obtaining a complete resection after preoperative radiation therapy was higher in patients who had previously undergone a low anterior resection than patients undergoing prior abdominoperineal resection. For the 30 patients undergoing external beam irradiation, resection, and IORT, the most significant toxicities were soft tissue or sacral injury and pelvic neuropathy. Efforts to further improve local control are directed toward the concurrent use of chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil with and without leucovorin) as radiation dose modifiers during external beam irradiation and the use of additional postoperative radiation therapy.

Intraoperative plus external beam irradiation in nonresectable lung cancer: assessment of local response and therapy-related side effects

Since 1987, 24 patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), stage T1-3 N0-2 M0, have undergone lymph node dissection and intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) to the primary with 10-20 Gy. Patient selection criteria were nonresectability based on severe cardiorespiratory impairment, no radiological evidence of distant metastases and a Karnofsky performance status of greater than 80. In 18 patients the IORT procedure was followed by an external beam radiation series (EBR) including the tumor with 46 Gy and the regional lymph nodes with 46/56 Gy. The tumor response was assessed by CAT-scan volumetry before the institution of IORT, 4 weeks later, before the onset of EBR, 8 weeks after the combined treatment course and on a 3 months basis thereafter. Prospectively, MRI of the thorax with/without Gadolinium-DTPA was performed to examine contrast enhancement and signal behavior of the tumor, in an attempt to differentiate residual disease compared to therapy-related collateral damage. So far, 18 patients have completed the combined treatment course with a median follow-up of 11 months (range 4.5 to 25 months). The overall local response rate (CR and PR) was 88.2%. In detail, 11 complete responses, 6 partial responses and one minimal response were observed. The overall and recurrence-free survival at 25 months was 49.6% and 83.3%, respectively.