1
|
Orlovskiy S, Gupta PK, Roman J, Arias-Mendoza F, Nelson DS, Koch CJ, Narayan V, Putt ME, Nath K. Lonidamine Induced Selective Acidification and De-Energization of Prostate Cancer Xenografts: Enhanced Tumor Response to Radiation Therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1384. [PMID: 38611062 PMCID: PMC11010960 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16071384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2024] [Revised: 03/29/2024] [Accepted: 03/30/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer is a multi-focal disease that can be treated using surgery, radiation, androgen deprivation, and chemotherapy, depending on its presentation. Standard dose-escalated radiation therapy (RT) in the range of 70-80 Gray (GY) is a standard treatment option for prostate cancer. It could be used at different phases of the disease (e.g., as the only primary treatment when the cancer is confined to the prostate gland, combined with other therapies, or as an adjuvant treatment after surgery). Unfortunately, RT for prostate cancer is associated with gastro-intestinal and genitourinary toxicity. We have previously reported that the metabolic modulator lonidamine (LND) produces cancer sensitization through tumor acidification and de-energization in diverse neoplasms. We hypothesized that LND could allow lower RT doses by producing the same effect in prostate cancer, thus reducing the detrimental side effects associated with RT. Using the Seahorse XFe96 and YSI 2300 Stat Plus analyzers, we corroborated the expected LND-induced intracellular acidification and de-energization of isolated human prostate cancer cells using the PC3 cell line. These results were substantiated by non-invasive 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), studying PC3 prostate cancer xenografts treated with LND (100 mg/kg, i.p.). In addition, we found that LND significantly increased tumor lactate levels in the xenografts using 1H MRS non-invasively. Subsequently, LND was combined with radiation therapy in a growth delay experiment, where we found that 150 µM LND followed by 4 GY RT produced a significant growth delay in PC3 prostate cancer xenografts, compared to either control, LND, or RT alone. We conclude that the metabolic modulator LND radio-sensitizes experimental prostate cancer models, allowing the use of lower radiation doses and diminishing the potential side effects of RT. These results suggest the possible clinical translation of LND as a radio-sensitizer in patients with prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stepan Orlovskiy
- Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (S.O.); (P.K.G.); (J.R.); (F.A.-M.); (D.S.N.)
| | - Pradeep Kumar Gupta
- Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (S.O.); (P.K.G.); (J.R.); (F.A.-M.); (D.S.N.)
| | - Jeffrey Roman
- Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (S.O.); (P.K.G.); (J.R.); (F.A.-M.); (D.S.N.)
| | - Fernando Arias-Mendoza
- Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (S.O.); (P.K.G.); (J.R.); (F.A.-M.); (D.S.N.)
- Advanced Imaging Research, Inc., Cleveland, OH 44114, USA
| | - David S. Nelson
- Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (S.O.); (P.K.G.); (J.R.); (F.A.-M.); (D.S.N.)
| | - Cameron J. Koch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA;
| | - Vivek Narayan
- Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA;
| | - Mary E. Putt
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA;
| | - Kavindra Nath
- Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; (S.O.); (P.K.G.); (J.R.); (F.A.-M.); (D.S.N.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhang Y, Lin C, Liu Z, Sun Y, Chen M, Guo Y, Liu W, Zhang C, Chen W, Sun J, Xia R, Hu Y, Yang X, Li J, Zhang Z, Cao W, Sun S, Wang X, Ji T. Cancer cells co-opt nociceptive nerves to thrive in nutrient-poor environments and upon nutrient-starvation therapies. Cell Metab 2022; 34:1999-2017.e10. [PMID: 36395769 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2022.10.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2021] [Revised: 08/19/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Although nutrient-starvation therapies can elicit strong anti-tumor effects in multiple carcinomas, it has been convincingly demonstrated that cancer cells exploit the tumor microenvironment to thrive in nutrient-poor environments. Here, we reveal that cancer cells can co-opt nociceptive nerves to thrive in nutrient-poor environments. Initially examining the low-glucose environment of oral mucosa carcinomas, we discovered that cancer cells employ ROS-triggered activation of c-Jun to secrete nerve growth factor (NGF), which conditions nociceptive nerves for calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) production. The neurogenic CGRP subsequently induces cytoprotective autophagy in cancer cells through Rap1-mediated disruption of the mTOR-Raptor interaction. Both anti-glycolysis and anti-angiogenesis-based nutrient-starvation therapies aggravate the vicious cycle of cancer cells and nociceptive nerves and therapeutically benefit from blocking neurogenic CGRP with an FDA-approved antimigraine drug. Our study sheds light on the role of the nociceptive nerve as a microenvironmental accomplice of cancer progression in nutrient-poor environments and upon nutrient-starvation therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Zhang
- Department of Oral Maxillofacial-Head Neck Oncology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China; College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai 200011, China
| | - Chengzhong Lin
- College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai 200011, China; The 2nd Dental Center, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China
| | - Zheqi Liu
- Department of Oral Maxillofacial-Head Neck Oncology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China; College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai 200011, China
| | - Yiting Sun
- College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai 200011, China; Department of Oral & Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China
| | - Mingtao Chen
- Department of Oral Maxillofacial-Head Neck Oncology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China; College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai 200011, China
| | - Yibo Guo
- Department of Oral Maxillofacial-Head Neck Oncology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China; College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai 200011, China
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Oral Maxillofacial-Head Neck Oncology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China; College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai 200011, China
| | - Chenping Zhang
- Department of Oral Maxillofacial-Head Neck Oncology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China; College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai 200011, China
| | - Wantao Chen
- Department of Oral Maxillofacial-Head Neck Oncology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China; College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai 200011, China
| | - Jian Sun
- Department of Oral Maxillofacial-Head Neck Oncology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China; College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai 200011, China
| | - Ronghui Xia
- College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai 200011, China; Department of Oral Pathology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China
| | - Yuhua Hu
- College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai 200011, China; Department of Oral Pathology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China
| | - Xi Yang
- Department of Oral Maxillofacial-Head Neck Oncology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China; College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai 200011, China
| | - Jiang Li
- College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai 200011, China; Department of Oral Pathology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China
| | - Zhiyuan Zhang
- Department of Oral Maxillofacial-Head Neck Oncology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China; College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai 200011, China
| | - Wei Cao
- Department of Oral Maxillofacial-Head Neck Oncology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China; College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai 200011, China
| | - Shuyang Sun
- Department of Oral Maxillofacial-Head Neck Oncology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China; College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai 200011, China.
| | - Xu Wang
- Department of Oral Maxillofacial-Head Neck Oncology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China; College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai 200011, China.
| | - Tong Ji
- Department of Oral Maxillofacial-Head Neck Oncology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China; College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, National Center for Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai 200011, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tumoral Oxygenation and Biodistribution of Lonidamine Oxygen Microbubbles Following Localized Ultrasound-Triggered Delivery. Int J Pharm 2022; 625:122072. [PMID: 35932933 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.122072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2022] [Revised: 07/27/2022] [Accepted: 07/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Prior work has shown that microbubble-assisted delivery of oxygen improves tumor oxygenation and radiosensitivity, albeit over a limited duration. Lonidamine (LND) has been investigated because of its ability to stimulate glycolysis, lactate production, inhibit mitochondrial respiration, and inhibit oxygen consumption rates in tumors but suffers from poor bioavailability. The goal of this work was to characterize LND-loaded oxygen microbubbles and assess their ability to oxygenate a human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) tumor model, while also assessing LND biodistribution. In tumors treated with surfactant-shelled microbubbles with oxygen core (SE61O2) and ultrasound, pO2 levels increased to a peak 19.5±9.7 mmHg, 50 seconds after injection and returning to baseline after 120 seconds. In comparison, in tumors treated with SE61O2/LND and ultrasound, pO2 levels showed a peak increase of 29.0±8.3 mmHg, which was achieved 70 seconds after injection returning to baseline after 300 seconds (p<0.001). The co-delivery of O2andLNDvia SE61 also showed an improvement of LND biodistribution in both plasma and tumor tissues (p<0.001). In summary, ultrasound-sensitive microbubbles loaded with O2 and LND provided prolonged oxygenation relative to oxygenated microbubbles alone, as well as provided an ability to locally deliver LND, making them more appropriate for clinical translation.
Collapse
|
4
|
Li H, Cao B, Zhao R, Li T, Xu X, Cui H, Deng H, Gao J, Wei B. circDNMT1 Promotes Malignant Progression of Gastric Cancer Through Targeting miR-576-3p/Hypoxia Inducible Factor-1 Alpha Axis. Front Oncol 2022; 12:817192. [PMID: 35712504 PMCID: PMC9197105 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.817192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Circular RNAs (circRNAs) regulate multiple malignant behaviors of various types of cancer. The role of circDNMT1, a newly identified circRNA, remains unknown in gastric cancer (GC). This study aimed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of circDNMT1 in regulating GC progression. Methods microRNA (miRNA) and circRNA expression was detected by quantitative real-time PCR. Western blotting was performed to measure hypoxia inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF-1α) protein expression. Sanger sequencing, gel electrophoresis and fluorescence in situ hybridization were performed to identify the presence of circDNMT1. The clinicopathological features and overall survival of patients were analyzed based on circDNMT1 expression. The proliferation, migration and invasion of GC cells were determined by cell counting kit-8, 5-ethynyl-2’-deoxyuridine, wound healing and transwell assays. Glycolysis of GC cells was detected based on the levels of glucose uptake, the lactate acid, ATP and pyruvic acid production and the extracellular acidification and oxygen consumption rates. The binding sites between miR-576-3p and circDNMT1 or HIF-1α were predicted by online bioinformatic tools and were validated using RNA pull-down and luciferase reporter assays. Xenograft models were established to determine the effects of the circDNMT1/miR-576-3p/HIF-1α axis on GC growth and metastasis in vivo. Results circDNMT1 was successfully identified and shown to be overexpressed in GC tissues and cell lines. The expression levels of circDNMT1 were correlated with pathological T stage, pathological TNM stage and shorter survival time of GC patients. circDNMT1 knockdown inhibited the proliferation, migration, invasion and glycolysis of GC cells. circDNMT1 functioned as an oncogenic factor by sponging miR-576-3p. HIF-1α was negatively regulated by miR-576-3p via binding its mRNA 3’ untranslated region. circDNMT1 promoted malignant behaviors and metabolic reprogramming of GC by targeting the miR-576-3p/HIF-1α axis both in vitro and in vivo. Conclusion These findings demonstrated that circDNMT1 knockdown inhibited GC proliferation, migration, invasion and glycolysis through sponging miR-576-3p/HIF-1α axis. circDNMT1 may be a novel target for GC treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanghang Li
- Graduate School, Medical School of Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA), Beijing, China
- First Medical Center, Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Bo Cao
- Graduate School, Medical School of Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA), Beijing, China
- First Medical Center, Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Ruiyang Zhao
- Graduate School, Medical School of Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA), Beijing, China
- First Medical Center, Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Tian Li
- School of Basic Medicine, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
| | - Xingming Xu
- First Medical Center, Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Hao Cui
- First Medical Center, Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Huan Deng
- Graduate School, Medical School of Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA), Beijing, China
- First Medical Center, Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jingwang Gao
- Graduate School, Medical School of Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA), Beijing, China
- First Medical Center, Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Bo Wei
- First Medical Center, Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
- *Correspondence: Bo Wei,
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Parmar A, Macluskey M, Mc Goldrick N, Conway DI, Glenny AM, Clarkson JE, Worthington HV, Chan KK. Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: chemotherapy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 12:CD006386. [PMID: 34929047 PMCID: PMC8687638 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd006386.pub4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers are the most common cancers arising in the head and neck. Treatment of oral cavity cancer is generally surgery followed by radiotherapy, whereas oropharyngeal cancers, which are more likely to be advanced at the time of diagnosis, are managed with radiotherapy or chemoradiation. Surgery for oral cancers can be disfiguring and both surgery and radiotherapy have significant functional side effects. The development of new chemotherapy agents, new combinations of agents and changes in the relative timing of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy treatments may potentially bring about increases in both survival and quality of life for this group of patients. This review updates one last published in 2011. OBJECTIVES To determine whether chemotherapy, in addition to radiotherapy and/or surgery for oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma results in improved overall survival, improved disease-free survival and/or improved locoregional control, when incorporated as either induction therapy given prior to locoregional treatment (i.e. radiotherapy or surgery), concurrent with radiotherapy or in the adjuvant (i.e. after locoregional treatment with radiotherapy or surgery) setting. SEARCH METHODS An information specialist searched 4 bibliographic databases up to 15 September 2021 and used additional search methods to identify published, unpublished and ongoing studies. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) where more than 50% of participants had primary tumours in the oral cavity or oropharynx, and that evaluated the addition of chemotherapy to other treatments such as radiotherapy and/or surgery, or compared two or more chemotherapy regimens or modes of administration. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS For this update, we assessed the new included trials for their risk of bias and at least two authors extracted data from them. Our primary outcome was overall survival (time to death from any cause). Secondary outcomes were disease-free survival (time to disease recurrence or death from any cause) and locoregional control (response to primary treatment). We contacted trial authors for additional information or clarification when necessary. MAIN RESULTS We included 100 studies with 18,813 participants. None of the included trials were at low risk of bias. For induction chemotherapy, we reported the results for contemporary regimens that will be of interest to clinicians and people being treated for oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers. Overall, there is insufficient evidence to clearly demonstrate a survival benefit from induction chemotherapy with platinum plus 5-fluorouracil prior to radiotherapy (hazard ratio (HR) for death 0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70 to 1.04, P = 0.11; 7427 participants, 5 studies; moderate-certainty evidence), prior to surgery (HR for death 1.06, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.60, P = 0.77; 198 participants, 1 study; low-certainty evidence) or prior to concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) with cisplatin (HR for death 0.71, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.35, P = 0.30; 389 participants, 2 studies; low-certainty evidence). There is insufficient evidence to support the use of an induction chemotherapy regimen with cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil plus docetaxel prior to CRT with cisplatin (HR for death 1.08, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.44, P = 0.63; 760 participants, 3 studies; low-certainty evidence). There is insufficient evidence to support the use of adjuvant chemotherapy over observation only following surgery (HR for death 0.95, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.22, P = 0.67; 353 participants, 5 studies; moderate-certainty evidence). Among studies that compared post-surgical adjuvant CRT, as compared to post-surgical RT, adjuvant CRT showed a survival benefit (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.98, P = 0.03; 1097 participants, 4 studies; moderate-certainty evidence). Primary treatment with CRT, as compared to radiotherapy alone, was associated with a reduction in the risk of death (HR for death 0.74, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.83, P < 0.00001; 2852 participants, 24 studies; moderate-certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The results of this review demonstrate that chemotherapy in the curative-intent treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers only seems to be of benefit when used in specific circumstances together with locoregional treatment. The evidence does not show a clear survival benefit from the use of induction chemotherapy prior to radiotherapy, surgery or CRT. Adjuvant CRT reduces the risk of death by 16%, as compared to radiotherapy alone. Concurrent chemoradiation as compared to radiation alone is associated with a greater than 20% improvement in overall survival; however, additional research is required to inform how the specific chemotherapy regimen may influence this benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ambika Parmar
- Medical Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, Toronto, Canada
| | | | | | - David I Conway
- Glasgow Dental School, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Anne-Marie Glenny
- Division of Dentistry, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Janet E Clarkson
- Division of Oral Health Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Helen V Worthington
- Cochrane Oral Health, Division of Dentistry, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Kelvin Kw Chan
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
van Gisbergen MW, Zwilling E, Dubois LJ. Metabolic Rewiring in Radiation Oncology Toward Improving the Therapeutic Ratio. Front Oncol 2021; 11:653621. [PMID: 34041023 PMCID: PMC8143268 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.653621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2021] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
To meet the anabolic demands of the proliferative potential of tumor cells, malignant cells tend to rewire their metabolic pathways. Although different types of malignant cells share this phenomenon, there is a large intracellular variability how these metabolic patterns are altered. Fortunately, differences in metabolic patterns between normal tissue and malignant cells can be exploited to increase the therapeutic ratio. Modulation of cellular metabolism to improve treatment outcome is an emerging field proposing a variety of promising strategies in primary tumor and metastatic lesion treatment. These strategies, capable of either sensitizing or protecting tissues, target either tumor or normal tissue and are often focused on modulating of tissue oxygenation, hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) stabilization, glucose metabolism, mitochondrial function and the redox balance. Several compounds or therapies are still in under (pre-)clinical development, while others are already used in clinical practice. Here, we describe different strategies from bench to bedside to optimize the therapeutic ratio through modulation of the cellular metabolism. This review gives an overview of the current state on development and the mechanism of action of modulators affecting cellular metabolism with the aim to improve the radiotherapy response on tumors or to protect the normal tissue and therefore contribute to an improved therapeutic ratio.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marike W van Gisbergen
- The M-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.,Department of Dermatology, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Emma Zwilling
- The M-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Ludwig J Dubois
- The M-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cruz-Gregorio A, Martínez-Ramírez I, Pedraza-Chaverri J, Lizano M. Reprogramming of Energy Metabolism in Response to Radiotherapy in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11:cancers11020182. [PMID: 30764513 PMCID: PMC6406552 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11020182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2018] [Revised: 01/24/2019] [Accepted: 02/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Head and neck cancer (HNC) is the sixth cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Head and neck squamous cells carcinoma (HNSCC) is the most frequent subtype of HNC. The development of HNSCC is associated to alcohol consumption, smoking or infection by high-risk human Papillomavirus (HR-HPV). Although the incidence of cancers associated with alcohol and tobacco has diminished, HNSCC associated with HR-HPV has significantly increased in recent years. However, HPV-positive HNSCC responds well to treatment, which includes surgery followed by radiation or chemoradiation therapy. Radiation therapy (RT) is based on ionizing radiation (IR) changing cell physiology. IR can directly interact with deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) or produce reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (RONS), provoking DNA damage. When DNA damage is not repaired, programmed cell death (apoptosis and/or autophagy) is induced. However, cancer cells can acquire resistance to IR avoiding cell death, where reprogramming of energy metabolism has a critical role and is intimately connected with hypoxia, mitochondrial physiology, oxidative stress (OS) and autophagy. This review is focused on the reprogramming of energy metabolism in response to RT in HPV-positive and HPV-negative HNSCC, showing their differences in cellular metabolism management and the probable direction of treatments for each subtype of HNSCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alfredo Cruz-Gregorio
- Unidad de Investigación Biomédica en Cáncer, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, México/Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, San Fernando No. 22, Col. Sección XVI, Tlalpan, Ciudad de México 14080, México.
| | - Imelda Martínez-Ramírez
- Unidad de Investigación Biomédica en Cáncer, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, México/Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, San Fernando No. 22, Col. Sección XVI, Tlalpan, Ciudad de México 14080, México.
| | - José Pedraza-Chaverri
- Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Química, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, Ciudad de México 04510, México.
| | - Marcela Lizano
- Unidad de Investigación Biomédica en Cáncer, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, México/Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, San Fernando No. 22, Col. Sección XVI, Tlalpan, Ciudad de México 14080, México.
- Departamento de Medicina Genómica y Toxicología Ambiental, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, Ciudad de México 04510, México.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Koukourakis MI, Giatromanolaki A. Warburg effect, lactate dehydrogenase, and radio/chemo-therapy efficacy. Int J Radiat Biol 2018; 95:408-426. [PMID: 29913092 DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2018.1490041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The anaerobic metabolism of glucose by cancer cells, even under well-oxygenated conditions, has been documented by Otto Warburg as early as 1927. Micro-environmental hypoxia and intracellular pathways activating the hypoxia-related gene response, shift cancer cell metabolism to anaerobic pathways. In the current review, we focus on a major enzyme involved in anaerobic transformation of pyruvate to lactate, namely lactate dehydrogenase 5 (LDH5). The value of LDH5 as a marker of prognosis of cancer patients, as a predictor of response to radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy and, finally, as a major target for cancer treatment and radio-sensitization is reported and discussed. Clinical, translational and experimental data supporting the uniqueness of the LDHA gene and its product LDH5 isoenzyme are summarized and future directions for a metabolic treatment of cancer are highlighted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael I Koukourakis
- a Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace , Alexandroupolis , Greece
| | - Alexandra Giatromanolaki
- b Department of Pathology , Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace , Alexandroupolis , Greece
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wilkie MD, Lau AS, Vlatkovic N, Jones TM, Boyd MT. Metabolic signature of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Consequences of TP53 mutation and therapeutic perspectives. Oral Oncol 2018; 83:1-10. [PMID: 30098763 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.05.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2018] [Accepted: 05/25/2018] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
There is a pressing need to identify ways of sensitising squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck (SCCHN) to the effects of current treatments, both from oncological and functional perspectives. Alteration to cellular metabolism is now widely considered a hallmark of the cancer phenotype; presents a potentially attractive therapeutic target in this regard; and as such has received renewed research interest in recent years. However, whilst metabolic disruption may occur to some degree in all tumours, there is undoubtedly heterogeneity and detailed study of individual tumour types is paramount if effective therapeutic strategies targeting metabolism are to be developed and effectively deployed. In this review we outline current understanding of altered tumour metabolism and how these adaptations promote tumorigenesis generally. We relate this specifically to SCCHN by focusing on several recent key studies specific to SCCHN, and by discussing the role TP53 mutation may play in this metabolic switch, given the fundamental role of this oncogenic event in SCCHN tumorigenesis. Finally, we also offer insight into the potential therapeutic implications this may have in the clinical setting and make recommendations for future study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark D Wilkie
- p53/MDM2 Research Team, Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Cancer Research Centre, University of Liverpool, 200 London Road, Liverpool L3 9TA, United Kingdom; Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, University Hospital Aintree, Lower Lane, Liverpool L9 7AL, United Kingdom.
| | - Andrew S Lau
- p53/MDM2 Research Team, Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Cancer Research Centre, University of Liverpool, 200 London Road, Liverpool L3 9TA, United Kingdom; Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, University Hospital Aintree, Lower Lane, Liverpool L9 7AL, United Kingdom
| | - Nikolina Vlatkovic
- p53/MDM2 Research Team, Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Cancer Research Centre, University of Liverpool, 200 London Road, Liverpool L3 9TA, United Kingdom
| | - Terence M Jones
- p53/MDM2 Research Team, Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Cancer Research Centre, University of Liverpool, 200 London Road, Liverpool L3 9TA, United Kingdom; Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, University Hospital Aintree, Lower Lane, Liverpool L9 7AL, United Kingdom
| | - Mark T Boyd
- p53/MDM2 Research Team, Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Cancer Research Centre, University of Liverpool, 200 London Road, Liverpool L3 9TA, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Akins NS, Nielson TC, Le HV. Inhibition of Glycolysis and Glutaminolysis: An Emerging Drug Discovery Approach to Combat Cancer. Curr Top Med Chem 2018; 18:494-504. [PMID: 29788892 PMCID: PMC6110043 DOI: 10.2174/1568026618666180523111351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 145] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2018] [Revised: 05/05/2018] [Accepted: 05/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Cancer cells have a very different metabolism from that of normal cells from which they are derived. Their metabolism is elevated, which allows them to sustain higher proliferative rate and resist some cell death signals. This phenomenon, known as the "Warburg effect", has become the focus of intensive efforts in the discovery of new therapeutic targets and new cancer drugs. Both glycolysis and glutaminolysis pathways are enhanced in cancer cells. While glycolysis is enhanced to satisfy the increasing energy demand of cancer cells, glutaminolysis is enhanced to provide biosynthetic precursors for cancer cells. It was recently discovered that there is a tyrosine phosphorylation of a specific isoform of pyruvate kinase, the M2 isoform, that is preferentially expressed in all cancer cells, which results in the generation of pyruvate through a unique enzymatic mechanism that is uncoupled from ATP production. Pyruvate produced through this unique enzymatic mechanism is converted primarily into lactic acid, rather than acetyl-CoA for the synthesis of citrate, which would normally then enter the citric acid cycle. Inhibition of key enzymes in glycolysis and glutaminolysis pathways with small molecules has provided a novel but emerging area of cancer research and has been proven effective in slowing the proliferation of cancer cells, with several inhibitors being in clinical trials. This review paper will cover recent advances in the development of chemotherapeutic agents against several metabolic targets for cancer therapy, including glucose transporters, hexokinase, pyruvate kinase M2, glutaminase, and isocitrate dehydrogenase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas S. Akins
- Department of BioMolecular Sciences and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi, Mississippi 38677, USA
| | - Tanner C. Nielson
- Department of BioMolecular Sciences and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi, Mississippi 38677, USA
| | - Hoang V. Le
- Department of BioMolecular Sciences and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi, Mississippi 38677, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abbruzzese C, Matteoni S, Signore M, Cardone L, Nath K, Glickson JD, Paggi MG. Drug repurposing for the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL & CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH : CR 2017; 36:169. [PMID: 29179732 PMCID: PMC5704391 DOI: 10.1186/s13046-017-0642-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2017] [Accepted: 11/17/2017] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Background Glioblastoma Multiforme is the deadliest type of brain tumor and is characterized by very poor prognosis with a limited overall survival. Current optimal therapeutic approach has essentially remained unchanged for more than a decade, consisting in maximal surgical resection followed by radiotherapy plus temozolomide. Main body Such a dismal patient outcome represents a compelling need for innovative and effective therapeutic approaches. Given the development of new drugs is a process presently characterized by an immense increase in costs and development time, drug repositioning, finding new uses for existing approved drugs or drug repurposing, re-use of old drugs when novel molecular findings make them attractive again, are gaining significance in clinical pharmacology, since it allows faster and less expensive delivery of potentially useful drugs from the bench to the bedside. This is quite evident in glioblastoma, where a number of old drugs is now considered for clinical use, often in association with the first-line therapeutic intervention. Interestingly, most of these medications are, or have been, widely employed for decades in non-neoplastic pathologies without relevant side effects. Now, the refinement of their molecular mechanism(s) of action through up-to-date technologies is paving the way for their use in the therapeutic approach of glioblastoma as well as other cancer types. Short conclusion The spiraling costs of new antineoplastic drugs and the long time required for them to reach the market demands a profoundly different approach to keep lifesaving therapies affordable for cancer patients. In this context, repurposing can represent a relatively inexpensive, safe and fast approach to glioblastoma treatment. To this end, pros and cons must be accurately considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Abbruzzese
- Department of Research, Advanced Diagnostics and Technological Innovation, Unit of Cellular Networks and Therapeutic Targets, Proteomics Area, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, IRCCS, Via Elio Chianesi, 53, Rome, Italy
| | - Silvia Matteoni
- Department of Research, Advanced Diagnostics and Technological Innovation, Unit of Cellular Networks and Therapeutic Targets, Proteomics Area, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, IRCCS, Via Elio Chianesi, 53, Rome, Italy
| | - Michele Signore
- RPPA Unit, Proteomics Area, Core Facilities, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Cardone
- Department of Research, Advanced Diagnostics and Technological Innovation, Unit of Cellular Networks and Therapeutic Targets, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Kavindra Nath
- Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jerry D Glickson
- Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Marco G Paggi
- Department of Research, Advanced Diagnostics and Technological Innovation, Unit of Cellular Networks and Therapeutic Targets, Proteomics Area, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, IRCCS, Via Elio Chianesi, 53, Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
Glycolysis is highly upregulated in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). HNSCC glycolysis is an important contributor to disease progression and decreases sensitivity to radiation or chemotherapy. Despite therapeutic advances, the survival rates for HNSCC patients remain low. Understanding glycolysis regulation in HNSCC will facilitate the development of effective therapeutic strategies for this disease. In this review, we will evaluate the regulation of altered HNSCC glycolysis and possible therapeutic approaches by targeting glycolytic pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dhruv Kumar
- Department of Bioinformatics, SRM University, Sonepat, Haryana-131029, India
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Nath K, Guo L, Nancolas B, Nelson DS, Shestov AA, Lee SC, Roman J, Zhou R, Leeper DB, Halestrap AP, Blair IA, Glickson JD. Mechanism of antineoplastic activity of lonidamine. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer 2016; 1866:151-162. [PMID: 27497601 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2016.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2016] [Revised: 07/26/2016] [Accepted: 08/03/2016] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Lonidamine (LND) was initially introduced as an antispermatogenic agent. It was later found to have anticancer activity sensitizing tumors to chemo-, radio-, and photodynamic-therapy and hyperthermia. Although the mechanism of action remained unclear, LND treatment has been known to target metabolic pathways in cancer cells. It has been reported to alter the bioenergetics of tumor cells by inhibiting glycolysis and mitochondrial respiration, while indirect evidence suggested that it also inhibited l-lactic acid efflux from cells mediated by members of the proton-linked monocarboxylate transporter (MCT) family and also pyruvate uptake into the mitochondria by the mitochondrial pyruvate carrier (MPC). Recent studies have demonstrated that LND potently inhibits MPC activity in isolated rat liver mitochondria (Ki 2.5μM) and cooperatively inhibits l-lactate transport by MCT1, MCT2 and MCT4 expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes with K0.5 and Hill coefficient values of 36-40μM and 1.65-1.85, respectively. In rat heart mitochondria LND inhibited the MPC with similar potency and uncoupled oxidation of pyruvate was inhibited more effectively (IC50~7μM) than other substrates including glutamate (IC50~20μM). LND inhibits the succinate-ubiquinone reductase activity of respiratory Complex II without fully blocking succinate dehydrogenase activity. LND also induces cellular reactive oxygen species through Complex II and has been reported to promote cell death by suppression of the pentose phosphate pathway, which resulted in inhibition of NADPH and glutathione generation. We conclude that MPC inhibition is the most sensitive anti-tumour target for LND, with additional inhibitory effects on MCT-mediated l-lactic acid efflux, Complex II and glutamine/glutamate oxidation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kavindra Nath
- Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| | - Lili Guo
- Center of Excellence in Environmental Toxicology, Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Bethany Nancolas
- School of Biochemistry, Biomedical Sciences Building, University of Bristol, BS8 1TD, UK
| | - David S Nelson
- Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Alexander A Shestov
- Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Seung-Cheol Lee
- Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Jeffrey Roman
- Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Rong Zhou
- Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Dennis B Leeper
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Andrew P Halestrap
- School of Biochemistry, Biomedical Sciences Building, University of Bristol, BS8 1TD, UK
| | - Ian A Blair
- Center of Excellence in Environmental Toxicology, Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Jerry D Glickson
- Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Cervantes-Madrid D, Romero Y, Dueñas-González A. Reviving Lonidamine and 6-Diazo-5-oxo-L-norleucine to Be Used in Combination for Metabolic Cancer Therapy. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2015; 2015:690492. [PMID: 26425550 PMCID: PMC4575731 DOI: 10.1155/2015/690492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2015] [Revised: 06/23/2015] [Accepted: 08/16/2015] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Abnormal metabolism is another cancer hallmark. The two most characterized altered metabolic pathways are high rates of glycolysis and glutaminolysis, which are natural targets for cancer therapy. Currently, a number of newer compounds to block glycolysis and glutaminolysis are being developed; nevertheless, lonidamine and 6-diazo-5-oxo-L-norleucine (DON) are two old drugs well characterized as inhibitors of glycolysis and glutaminolysis, respectively, whose clinical development was abandoned years ago when the importance of cancer metabolism was not fully appreciated and clinical trial methodology was less developed. In this review, a PubMed search using the words lonidamine and 6-diazo-5-oxo-L-norleucine (DON) was undertaken to analyse existing information on the preclinical and clinical studies of these drugs for cancer treatment. Data show that they exhibit antitumor effects; besides there is also the suggestion that they are synergistic. We conclude that lonidamine and DON are safe and potentially effective drugs that need to be reevaluated in combination as metabolic therapy of cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yair Romero
- Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 04510 Mexico City, DF, Mexico
| | - Alfonso Dueñas-González
- Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México/Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, 14080 Mexico City, DF, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Furness S, Glenny AM, Worthington HV, Pavitt S, Oliver R, Clarkson JE, Macluskey M, Chan KK, Conway DI. Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: chemotherapy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011:CD006386. [PMID: 21491393 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd006386.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers are frequently described as part of a group of oral cancers or head and neck cancer. Treatment of oral cavity cancer is generally surgery followed by radiotherapy, whereas oropharyngeal cancers, which are more likely to be advanced at the time of diagnosis, are managed with radiotherapy or chemoradiation. Surgery for oral cancers can be disfiguring and both surgery and radiotherapy have significant functional side effects, notably impaired ability to eat, drink and talk. The development of new chemotherapy agents, new combinations of agents and changes in the relative timing of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy treatments may potentially bring about increases in both survival and quality of life for this group of patients. OBJECTIVES To determine whether chemotherapy, in addition to radiotherapy and/or surgery for oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer results in improved survival, disease free survival, progression free survival, locoregional control and reduced recurrence of disease. To determine which regimen and time of administration (induction, concomitant or adjuvant) is associated with better outcomes. SEARCH STRATEGY Electronic searches of the Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED were undertaken on 1st December 2010. Reference lists of recent reviews and included studies were also searched to identify further trials. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials where more than 50% of participants had primary tumours in the oral cavity or oropharynx, and which compared the addition of chemotherapy to other treatments such as radiotherapy and/or surgery, or compared two or more chemotherapy regimens or modes of administration, were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Eighty-nine trials which met the inclusion criteria were assessed for risk of bias and data were extracted by two or more review authors. The primary outcome was total mortality. Trial authors were contacted for additional information or for clarification. MAIN RESULTS There is evidence of a small increase in overall survival associated with induction chemotherapy compared to locoregional treatment alone (25 trials), hazard ratio (HR) of mortality 0.92 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84 to 1.00, P = 0.06). Post-surgery adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with improved overall survival compared to surgery ± radiotherapy alone (10 trials), HR of mortality 0.88 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.99, P = 0.03), and there is some evidence that this improvement may be greater with concomitant adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (4 trials), HR of mortality 0.84 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.98, P = 0.03). In patients with unresectable tumours, there is evidence that concomitant or alternating chemoradiotherapy is associated with improved survival compared to radiotherapy alone (26 trials), HR of mortality 0.78 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.83, P < 0.00001). These findings are confirmed by sensitivity analyses based on studies assessed at low risk of bias. There is insufficient evidence to identify which agent(s) and/or regimen(s) are the most effective. The additional toxicity attributable to chemotherapy in the combined regimens remains unquantified. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Chemotherapy, in addition to radiotherapy and surgery, is associated with improved overall survival in patients with oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers. Induction chemotherapy may prolong survival by 8 to 20% and adjuvant concomitant chemoradiotherapy may prolong survival by up to 16%. In patients with unresectable tumours, concomitant or alternating chemoradiotherapy may prolong survival by 10 to 22%. There is insufficient evidence as to which agent or regimen is most effective and the additional toxicity associated with chemotherapy given in addition to radiotherapy and/or surgery cannot be quantified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Furness
- Cochrane Oral Health Group, School of Dentistry, The University of Manchester, Coupland III Building, Oxford Rd, Manchester, UK, M13 9PL
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Sandulache VC, Myers JN. Altered metabolism in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: an opportunity for identification of novel biomarkers and drug targets. Head Neck 2011; 34:282-90. [PMID: 21322078 DOI: 10.1002/hed.21664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2010] [Revised: 08/09/2010] [Accepted: 10/04/2010] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Tumor cells were first shown to exhibit a distinct metabolic phenotype over 80 years ago. Since then, it has become clear that multiple oncogenic events contribute to the development of a metabolic phenotype that supports rapid proliferation. Because this phenotype represents an essential component of tumorigenesis and disease progression, it also represents a potential source of biomarkers associated with aggressive disease. In addition, the addiction of tumor cells to specific nutrients and the up-regulation of key metabolic enzymes provide unique opportunities for pharmacologic manipulation. Despite the use of multimodality treatment, survival rates for patients with advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remain low, partially attributed to the development of drug resistance. In this review, we evaluate the role of altered HNSCC metabolism as both a source of novel biomarkers and a means to bypass resistance mechanisms to conventional forms of therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vlad C Sandulache
- Bobby R. Alford Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Furness S, Glenny AM, Worthington HV, Pavitt S, Oliver R, Clarkson JE, Macluskey M, Chan KK, Conway DI. Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: chemotherapy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010:CD006386. [PMID: 20824847 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd006386.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers are frequently described as part of a group of oral cancers or head and neck cancer. Treatment of oral cavity cancer is generally surgery followed by radiotherapy, whereas oropharyngeal cancers, which are more likely to be advanced at the time of diagnosis, are managed with radiotherapy or chemoradiation. Surgery for oral cancers can be disfiguring and both surgery and radiotherapy have significant functional side effects, notably impaired ability to eat, drink and talk. The development of new chemotherapy agents, new combinations of agents and changes in the relative timing of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy treatments may potentially bring about increases in both survival and quality of life for this group of patients. OBJECTIVES To determine whether chemotherapy, in addition to radiotherapy and/or surgery for oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer results in improved survival, disease free survival, progression free survival, locoregional control and reduced recurrence of disease. To determine which regimen and time of administration (induction, concomitant or adjuvant) is associated with better outcomes. SEARCH STRATEGY Electronic searches of the Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED were undertaken on 28th July 2010. Reference lists of recent reviews and included studies were also searched to identify further trials. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials where more than 50% of participants had primary tumours in the oral cavity or oropharynx, and which compared the addition of chemotherapy to other treatments such as radiotherapy and/or surgery, or compared two or more chemotherapy regimens or modes of administration, were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Trials which met the inclusion criteria were assessed for risk of bias using six domains: sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding, completeness of outcome data, selective reporting and other possible sources of bias. Data were extracted using a specially designed form and entered into the characteristics of included studies table and the analysis sections of the review. The proportion of participants in each trial with oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers are recorded in Additional Table 1. MAIN RESULTS There was no statistically significant improvement in overall survival associated with induction chemotherapy compared to locoregional treatment alone in 25 trials (hazard ratio (HR) of mortality 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84 to 1.00). Post-surgery adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved overall survival compared to surgery +/- radiotherapy alone in 10 trials (HR of mortality 0.88, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.99), and there was an additional benefit of adjuvant concomitant chemoradiotherapy compared to radiotherapy in 4 of these trials (HR of mortality 0.84, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.98). Concomitant chemoradiotherapy resulted in improved survival compared to radiotherapy alone in patients whose tumours were considered unresectable in 25 trials (HR of mortality 0.79, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.84). However, the additional toxicity attributable to chemotherapy in the combined regimens remains unquantified. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Chemotherapy, in addition to radiotherapy and surgery, is associated with improved overall survival in patients with oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers. Induction chemotherapy is associated with a 9% increase in survival and adjuvant concomitant chemoradiotherapy is associated with a 16% increase in overall survival following surgery. In patients with unresectable tumours, concomitant chemoradiotherapy showed a 22% benefit in overall survival compared with radiotherapy alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Furness
- Cochrane Oral Health Group, School of Dentistry, The University of Manchester, Coupland III Bldg, Oxford Rd, Manchester, UK, M13 9PL
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Chambers JW, Fowler ML, Morris MT, Morris JC. The anti-trypanosomal agent lonidamine inhibits Trypanosoma brucei hexokinase 1. Mol Biochem Parasitol 2008; 158:202-7. [PMID: 18262292 DOI: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2007.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2007] [Revised: 12/19/2007] [Accepted: 12/27/2007] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Glycolysis is essential to the parasitic protozoan Trypanosoma brucei. The first step in this metabolic pathway is mediated by hexokinase, an enzyme that transfers the gamma-phosphate of ATP to a hexose. The T. brucei genome (TREU927/4 GUTat10.1) encodes two hexokinases (TbHK1 and TbHK2) that are 98% identical at the amino acid level. Our previous efforts have revealed that TbHK2 is an important regulator of TbHK1 in procyclic form parasites. Here, we have found through RNAi that TbHK1 is essential to the bloodstream form parasite. Silencing the gene for 4 days reduces cellular hexokinase approximately 60% and leads to parasite death. Additionally, we have found that the recombinant enzyme is inhibited by lonidamine (IC(50)=850 microM), an anti-cancer drug that targets tumor hexokinases. This agent also inhibits HK activity from whole parasite lysate (IC(50)=965 microM). Last, lonidamine is toxic to cultured bloodstream form parasites (LD(50)=50 microM) and procyclic form parasites (LD(50)=180 microM). Interestingly, overexpression of TbHK1 protects PF parasites from lonidamine. These studies provide genetic evidence that TbHK1 is a valid therapeutic target while identifying a potential molecular target of the anti-trypanosomal agent lonidamine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy W Chambers
- Department of Genetics and Biochemistry, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, United States
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Gatto MT, Tita B, Artico M, Saso L. Recent studies on lonidamine, the lead compound of the antispermatogenic indazol-carboxylic acids. Contraception 2002; 65:277-8. [PMID: 12020777 DOI: 10.1016/s0010-7824(02)00289-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Lonidamine (LND) or [1-(2,4-dichlorobenzyl)-1H-indazole-3-carboxylic acid] is an anticancer and an antispermatogenic drug whose mechanism of action is still incompletely understood. LND is effective against a number of tumors, including head, neck and breast cancers, probably because of the inhibition of mitochondrial electron transport and the enzyme hexokinase and to the induction of apoptosis. Instead, the antispermatogenic activity of LND appeared to be related not only to its energolytic activity but also to other effects activities such as the inhibition of specific chloride channels in the epididymis and the disruption of the inter-Sertoli-germ cell junctions, leading to premature release of germ cells. In addition, we recently reported that, in the rat, LND at the dose of 100 mg/Kg b.w. p.o., a fully active but well tolerated dose, caused specific changes of the testicular and epididymal macroglobulins (alpha(2)-macroglobulin, alpha(1) inhibitor-3 and alpha(1)-macroglobulin). Further studies are needed to elucidate the mechanism of action of LND, the lead compound of an interesting class of antispermatogenic drugs based on the core structure of 1-(2,4-dichlorobenzyl)-indazole-3-carboxylic acid.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Teresa Gatto
- Department of Pharmacology of Natural Substances and General Physiology, University of Rome La Sapienza, Italy
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Teh BS, Monga U, Thornby J, Gressot L, Parke RB, Donovan DT. Concurrent chemotherapy and "concomitant boost" radiotherapy for unresectable head and neck cancer. Am J Otolaryngol 2000; 21:306-11. [PMID: 11032294 DOI: 10.1053/ajot.2000.0210306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE For patients with advanced head and neck cancer, various combined chemoradiotherapy regimens have been used to improve local control. This study was carried out to assess the outcome of concomitant chemotherapy with a "concomitant boost" radiotherapy in the treatment of advanced unresectable head and neck cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty-eight patients were treated with combined chemoradiotherapy between the years of 1990 and 1995. Cisplatinum (100 mg/m2) was given intravenously during week 1 and week 5. A "concomitant boost" external beam radiotherapy approach was used with twice-daily treatment delivered during the last 2 weeks. A total of 70 Gy was delivered over 6 weeks. Median follow-up was 23.5 months (2-79 months). RESULTS Thirty-one (65%) and 17 (35%) patients achieved complete and partial response, respectively. Median survival in complete responders has not been reached. Overall survival at 2 years, 3 years, and 5 years were 58.7%, 52.8%, and 42.4%, respectively. Median overall survival was 38.8 months. Acute confluent mucositis (Radiation Therapy Oncology [RTOG] grade 3) developed in 50% of patients, but there was no severe long-term treatment-related toxicity. CONCLUSION This combined chemoradiotherapy approach is safe and efficacious for advanced unresectable head and neck cancer. Treatment-related toxicity was acceptable with 50% of patients developing acute confluent mucositis. There was no severe long-term treatment-related toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B S Teh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston TX, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Dowlatshahi M, Iganej S, Ciabatone A, Peddada A, Miller M, Tome M, Rao A, Ryoo M, Becker G, McNicoll M, Morgan T, Ryoo J, Kagan R. Uninterrupted moderately accelerated radiotherapy in the treatment of unresectable/advanced head and neck cancer: one institution's experience and a comparative review. Am J Clin Oncol 2000; 23:149-54. [PMID: 10776975 DOI: 10.1097/00000421-200004000-00009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Conventional radiotherapy alone in treatment of unresectable or locally advanced head and neck cancer has poor results. To improve outcome without significant increase in acute and late morbidity, we began a moderately accelerated hyperfractionation radiation therapy protocol without breaks for treatment of unresectable/advanced head and neck malignancies. From August 1984 to June 1995, 48 patients with unresectable or advanced carcinoma of the head and neck were treated using a protocol of accelerated hyperfractionation radiation therapy at Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Los Angeles. Patients were treated twice a day using 150 cGy per fraction, 4 days per week, to a final dose of 60 Gy. Two patients were excluded from this analysis because they did not complete treatment. With a median follow-up of 33 months, 31 (67%) patients have had disease recurrence, 30 (65%) of whom had a locoregional component to their failures. At the last follow-up, 12 patients (26%) were alive with no evidence of disease, 30 patients had died of disease, and 4 had died of intercurrent disease without recurrence. Nine (19%) patients required treatment interruptions averaging 8 days in duration. This accelerated regimen resulted in outcomes similar to those with conventional radiotherapy, most likely because of a conservative total dose. Further refinement of fractionation schedules with potential incorporation of chemotherapy must be investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Dowlatshahi
- Kaiser Permanente Medical Center Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Goodman MD, Tarnoff M, Kain M, Slotman GJ. Interactions between outcomes and tumor response to preoperative cisplatin-sensitized radiotherapy in advanced head and neck cancer. Southern New Jersey Head and Neck Cancer Treatment Group. Am J Surg 1997; 174:527-31. [PMID: 9374230 DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(97)00151-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Whether or not tumor response to chemotherapy-sensitized radiation therapy (CTRT) for head and neck cancer leads to an improved outcome is unknown. METHODS Forty patients who received preoperative cisplatin plus simultaneous radiotherapy for operable stage III and IV head and neck cancer were reviewed retrospectively regarding clinical demographics, staging, and survival status. RESULTS Twenty-one (57%) patients had a histologic complete response (HCR) and 16 (43%) had a partial (PR) (9) or clinical complete (7) response (CCR). Tumor response of N1 versus N2-3 nodal disease showed 6 (75%) HCR and 4 (25%). Five-year disease-free survival overall was 82% for HCR versus 38% for PR/CCR (P <0.05). Disease-specific 5-year survival was 100% for HCR versus 27% for PR/CCR (P <0.002). CONCLUSIONS Histologic complete response to CTRT for head and neck cancer is associated with increased survival and encouraging disease-free status. Response to CTRT is inversely proportional to lymphatic tumor load.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M D Goodman
- Department of Surgery, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey/Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Cooper Hospital/University Medical Center, Camden 08103, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Chekulayev V, Shevchuk I, Chekulayeva L, Kahru A. Study of the photochemical and phototoxic properties of lonidamine [1-(2,4-dichlorobenzyl)-1H-indazol-3-carboxylic acid]. JOURNAL OF PHOTOCHEMISTRY AND PHOTOBIOLOGY. B, BIOLOGY 1997; 41:11-21. [PMID: 9440309 DOI: 10.1016/s1011-1344(97)00062-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Lonidamine (LND) is an antispermatogenic and antitumour agent acting via inhibition of the energy metabolism. According to our results LND in vitro acted as a photosensitizer enhancing synergistically the lethal action of UV radiation (lambda max = 330 nm, the range between 260-390 nm) towards Ehrlich carcinoma cells (EAC). The primary targets of phototoxic action of LND probably were cell membranes and mitochondria. UV irradiation of EAC in the presence of LND increased the permeability of the plasma membranes, stimulated the photoperoxidation of lipids, enhanced the inhibition of dehydrogenase activity and oxygen consumption of the cells. Deficiency of oxygen substantially decreased phototoxicity of LND. LND may induce photosensitized destruction of biomolecules by acting through type 1 and 2 reactions. It could be supposed that negative side effects of LND (e.g., photophobia and photosensitivity that have been reported for some cancer patients treated with LND) could be associated with its photosensitizing properties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Chekulayev
- Institute of Chemistry, Department of Bioorganic Chemistry, Tallinn, Estonia
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Murren JR, Rappa G, Cheng YC. Multifunctional modulators of drug resistance. Cancer Treat Res 1996; 87:381-408. [PMID: 8886462 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4613-1267-3_16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- J R Murren
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Teicher BA, Holden SA, Ara G, Menon K. Whole-body hyperthermia and lonidamine as adjuvant therapy to treatment with cisplatin with or without local radiation in mouse bearing the Lewis lung carcinoma. Int J Hyperthermia 1995; 11:637-45. [PMID: 7594815 DOI: 10.3109/02656739509022496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
The Lewis lung carcinoma implanted subcutaneously in the hind leg of a C57BL mouse metastasizes avidly to the lungs of the host. This tumour model system thus allows assessment of both primary and metastatic disease to treatment. Lonidamine (50 mg/kg) administered once or twice daily produced approximately additive tumour growth delay with whole-body hyperthermia (60 min to 42 degrees C and 60 min at 42 degrees C). The addition of lonidamine to treatment with cisplatin (10 mg/kg) and whole-body hyperthermia continued to produce increased tumour growth delay of up to 14.7 days compared with 10.8 days for cisplatin/whole-body hyperthermia. The response of the metastatic disease paralleled that of the primary tumour with a reduction in the number and percent of large metastases (> 3 mm) on day 20 post-tumour implantation. The addition of local fractionated radiation therapy (3 Gy x 5) to the primary tumour produced a very effective treatment regimen resulting in 37.5 days of tumour growth delay along with twice daily lonidamine/cisplatin whole-body hyperthermia. With this treatment regimen there was also a reduction to 50% of control of the number of lung metastases as well as the percent of large metastases on day 20. Further investigation of these treatment combinations is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B A Teicher
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Jassem J, Bartelink H. Chemotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer: a critical reappraisal. Cancer Treat Rev 1995; 21:447-62. [PMID: 8556718 DOI: 10.1016/0305-7372(95)90029-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- J Jassem
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdańsk, Poland
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Popert RJ, Masters JR, Coptcoat M, Zupi G. Relative cytotoxicities of adriamycin and epirubicin in combination with lonidamine against human bladder cancer cell lines. UROLOGICAL RESEARCH 1995; 22:367-72. [PMID: 7740656 DOI: 10.1007/bf00296877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
We have used a panel of bladder cancer cell lines to compare the toxicities of Adriamycin and epirubicin, two drugs used intravesically to treat superficial transitional cell cancer (TCC) of the bladder, alone and in combination with lonidamine, an agent known to be active against anthracycline-resistant disease. Comparing concentrations reducing colony-forming ability by 50%, epirubicin and Adriamycin were similar in their cytotoxicities, although epirubicin was more potent against every line except an Adriamycin-resistant subline. Combinations of the two drugs with a non-cytotoxic concentration (1 microgram/ml) of lonidamine were tested using the Adriamycin-resistant subline MGH-U1R and its sensitive parental line MGH-U1. The addition of lonidamine caused a two-fold increase in the sensitivity of the resistant subline to both drugs, while having no effect on the sensitivity of the parental line. The data indicate that this combination might be of value in anthracycline-resistant disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R J Popert
- Department of Urology, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Affiliation(s)
- B A Teicher
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02115
| |
Collapse
|