The potential for normal tissue dose reduction with neoadjuvant hormonal therapy in conformal treatment planning for stage C prostate cancer

Impact of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy on toxicity in intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer

This study aimed to compare toxicities, prostate volume and dosimetry, between patients who underwent intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) combined with ≥3 months of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (NADT) and those without NADT for prostate cancer. In total, 449 patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer received 78 Gy IMRT in 39 fractions, of which 129 were treated without any ADT (non-ADT group) and 320 with NADT ≥3 months (NADT group). Adverse events and dose-volume indices were compared between the two groups retrospectively. The NADT group had a lower rate of acute grade 2 gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities (17% vs 25%, P = 0.063) and late grade 2 GI toxicities (P = 0.055), including a significantly lower rate of late grade 2 rectal hemorrhage (P = 0.033), compared with the non-ADT group. There were no cases of late grade 3 or higher GI toxicities. The average volume of the prostate in the NADT group was 38% smaller than that in the non-ADT group (43.7 vs 27.0 cm3, P < 0.001). Bladder V40Gy and V50Gy, and rectum V40Gy, V50Gy, V60Gy and V70Gy were significantly smaller in the NADT group. In the NADT group, no significant difference was observed in adverse events or dosimetry between the subgroups with NADT ≥12 and <12 months. Acute and late rectal toxicities were reduced by NADT within ≥3 months in accordance with reduced prostate volume and improved rectal dosimetry. This suggests a merit of administering neoadjuvant ADT ≥3 months for reducing rectal toxicities.

Using a Further Planning MRI after Neoadjuvant Androgen Deprivation Therapy Significantly Reduces the Radiation Exposure of Organs at Risk in External Beam Radiotherapy of Prostate Cancer

Radiotherapy for prostate cancer is often preceded by neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), which leads to a reduction in the size of the prostate. This study examines whether it is relevant for treatment planning to acquire a second planning magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after ADT (=MRI 2) or whether it can be planned without disadvantage based on an MRI acquired before starting ADT (=MRI 1). The imaging data for the radiotherapy treatment planning of 17 patients with prostate cancer who received two planning MRIs (before and after neoadjuvant ADT) were analyzed as follows: detailed comparable radiation plans were created separately, each based on the planning CT scan and either MRI 1 or MRI 2. After ADT for an average of 17.2 weeks, the prostate was reduced in size by an average of 24%. By using MRI 2 for treatment planning, the V60Gy of the rectum could be significantly relieved by an average of 15% with the same coverage of the target volume, and the V70Gy by as much as 33% (compared to using MRI 1 alone). Using a second MRI for treatment planning after neoadjuvant ADT in prostate cancer leads to a significant relief for the organs at risk, especially in the high dose range, with the same irradiation of the target volume, and should therefore be carried out regularly. Waiting for the prostate to shrink after a few months of ADT contributes to relief for the organs at risk and to lowering the toxicity. However, the use of reduced target volumes requires an image-guided application, and the oncological outcome needs to be verified in further studies.

Comparison of peripheral zone and central gland volume in patients undergoing intensity-modulated radiotherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The shrinking effect of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and radiotherapy (RT) on prostate gland volume is a known clinical finding. Until now, it is not known which part of the prostate shrinks more. We examined patients with and without ADT undergoing intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) and performed 3-dimensional measurements of the peripheral zone (PZ) and central gland (CG) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Prostate gland volumes of PZ and CG between planning MRI and first available follow-up MRI were retrospectively determined in 44 patients with localized prostate carcinoma. A total of 24 patients had ADT with a median time interval of 5 months (range, 1.5-24 months). Median time interval between both MRI time points was 132 days (range, 104-224 days). Two observers performed PZ and CG delineation in consensus using planimetry. Volume changes over time were determined and compared.

RESULTS

Patients who had ADT showed smaller prostate volume in the first MRI (mean [SD], 32 [16.7] mL), which was still present after IMRT (28.1 [16.7] mL). Patients who had no ADT started with 44.6 (16.9) mL and showed 37.5 (13.9) mL after IMRT. Shrinking effect in PZ was significantly larger than in CG for all patients (-18.3% vs -6.3%, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Because, typically, most tumors are located in PZ and this area also shows the largest shrinkage effect after IMRT, this should be taken into account for planning purposes. Notably, there are only minor differences in the relative shrinking effects between patients with and without ADT, although they start with different volumes.

The effect of concurrent androgen deprivation and 3D conformal radiotherapy on prostate volume and clinical organ doses during treatment for prostate cancer

In this study, we investigated the shrinking effect of concurrent three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and androgen deprivation (AD) on prostate volume, and its possible impact on the dose received by the rectum and bladder during the course of 3D-CRT. The difference between the prostatic volumes determined on pre-treatment planning CT (PL-CT) and post-treatment CT (PT-CT) following a 3D-CRT course was assessed in 52 patients with localised prostate carcinoma. The changes in mean prostate volume when compared with PL-CT and PT-CT-based measurements were assessed. The pre- and post-treatment mean prostate volumes for the whole study population were 49.7 cm(3) and 41.0 cm(3) (p _ 0.02), respectively. The study cohort was divided into two groups depending on the duration of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation (NAD): 23 patients (44.7%) were designated as "short NAD" (< or =3 months; SNAD) and the remaining 29 (55.3%) as "long NAD" (>3 months; LNAD). Patients on SNAD experienced a significantly greater reduction in prostate volume compared with those on LNAD (14.1% vs 5.1%; p _ 0.03). A significant increase in rectum V(40-60) values in PT-CT compared with PL-CT was demonstrated. LNAD patients had significantly higher rectal V(50-70) values at PT-CT compared with the SNAD group. There was a significant decline in V(30)-V(75) bladder values in PT-CT compared with PL-CT in the SNAD group. In conclusion, a higher prostate volume reduction during 3D-CRT was demonstrated when RT planning was performed within 3 months of NAD. However, this reduction and daily organ motion may lead to an unpredictable increase in rectal doses.

Neoadjuvant androgen deprivation for prostate volume reduction: the optimal duration in prostate cancer radiotherapy

OBJECTIVES

For locally advanced prostate cancer, the results of radiotherapy are improved by combination with androgen deprivation therapy. Volume reduction achieved with neoadjuvant hormonal treatment can facilitate dose escalation without increasing the toxicity. The optimal duration of hormonal treatment, however, is unknown. The endpoint of this study is the optimal duration of androgen deprivation for prostate volume reduction in a cohort of patients scheduled for external beam radiotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty patients scheduled for external beam radiotherapy with cT2-3No/xMo prostate cancer were treated with a luteinizing hormone releasing hormone agonist (busereline) and nonsteroidal anti-androgen (nilutamide) for 9 months consecutively. Repeated CT scan examination was performed 3-monthly to measure prostate volumes until the start of radiation therapy. The analysis of volume reduction was performed with the Wilcoxon signed ranks test.

RESULTS

The baseline median prostate volume for the cohort of patients was 82 cc (95% CI: 61-104 cc) with a median volume reduction of 31% (95% CI: 26%-35%) (P < 0.0001) after 3 months of androgen deprivation. Between 3 and 6 months, a median volume reduction of 9% (95% CI: 4%-14%) (P < 0.0001) was observed. The effect was more pronounced in large prostates (>60 cc) than in small prostates (≤60 cc). In the total cohort of patients no significant volume reduction occurred between 6 and 9 months of maximal androgen blockade (MAB).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we have shown that the most significant prostate volume reduction is achieved after 3 months of MAB with a maximum reduction after 6 months. Therefore, the optimal duration of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation to reduce prostate volume before prostate cancer radiotherapy is 6 months. In small prostates 3 months of hormonal treatment may be enough for maximal volume reduction.

Changes of prostate gland volume with and without androgen deprivation after intensity modulated radiotherapy - A follow-up study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The shrinking effect of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) on prostate volume is a known finding, but data on volume changes during radiotherapy are inconsistent. We examined patients with and without ADT undergoing intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and performed follow-up examinations to study volume changes before and after radiotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Prostate volumes between planning magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and last available follow-up MRI were retrospectively determined in 39 patients. Median time interval between first and last MRI was 233days (range 126-813). Two observers performed volume measurements in consensus and were blind to the timing of MRI. Volume changes over MRI were determined using the ellipsoid formula. Data of patients with and without ADT were compared by a linear mixed model.

RESULTS

Of 39 patients, 22 had ADT with a median duration of 5months (range 1-24). ADT patients showed lower prostate volume throughout the study period (-28% to 38%). Although individual shrinking effect was highly variable, patients treated with IMRT but without ADT showed a significantly larger volume reduction (26.1%) than patients with ADT (12.9%, p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing IMRT show definite prostate shrinkage. The rate is slowed down after 6months in both groups, whereas the volume reduction is significantly larger in patients without ADT. Nevertheless there is no adding effect of ADT+IMRT vs. IMRT alone.

Impact of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy on dose-volume histograms in patients with localized prostate cancer under radical radiation therapy

INTRODUCTION

Prostate volume involves a defined toxicity predictor in the radiation therapy of localized prostate cancer. Neoadjuvant hormone therapy (nHT) can reduce prostate volume and, therefore, the planned volume. The objective of this study was to establish if the value of nHT reduces the planned volume and if this reduction correlates with a reduction of the dose received in the target organs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

28 patients diagnosed of localized prostate cancer and referred to our departments for radiation therapy with radical intention, in the period ranging between April 2002 and October 2003, were included prospectively. The patients received nHT (triptorelin + flutamide) for 2 months and adjuvant HT until completing 2 years in the high-risk cases. A transrectal ultrasound study was performed in all patients, simulation CT and planning before the start of HT and after 2 months of treatment. The radiation therapy was carried out with 6 or 18 MV LINAC photons, with a dose fractioning scheme of 5 x 180-200 cGy, a total dosage of 66-72 Gy to prostate, 56 Gy to seminal vesicles and, in the high-risk cases, 46 Gy to pelvic lymph nodes.

RESULTS

The distribution according to risk group was: low risk 3.6%, intermediate risk 28.6% and high risk 67.9%. By transrectal ultrasound, prostate volume on diagnosis was 50.65 cc pre HT and 38.97 cc post HT (p < 0.001), which means a volume reduction of 24%. The comparative analysis of the dose-volume histograms of the first versus the second CT shows a reduction in the planned volume GTV1 (prostate) (81.33 cc vs 63.96 cc, p < 0.05), PTV1 (prostate and margin) (197.51 cc vs 168.38 cc, p < 0.001) and PTV2 (prostate, vesicles and margin) (340.5 cc vs 307.26 cc, p < 0.05), a reduction of the maximum dose in the seminal vesicles (70.2 versus 68.75 Gy, p < 0.05), a reduction of the mean dose in the seminal vesicles (65.07 Gy versus 63.07 Gy, p < 0.05), PTV2 (67.72 Gy versus 66.9 Gy, p < 0.01) and PTV3 (prostate, vesicles, pelvic lymph nodes and margin) (58.86 Gy versus 57.21 Gy, p < 0.01), a reduction of the D90 in the seminal vesicles (61.83 Gy versus 60.06 Gy, p < 0.05) and PTV2 (61.04 Gy versus 59.45 Gy, p < 0.05) and a reduction of V60 of the rectum (32.45% versus 28.22%, p < 0.05) and V60 of the bladder (41.78% versus 31.67%, p < 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant hormone therapy reduces significantly prostate volume and as a result the planned volume and consequently the rectal and bladder V60 can be significantly reduced.

Managing locally advanced prostate cancer: a urologist??s and a patient??s perspective

A 60-year-old man presented to his general practitioner with prostatic symptoms and high blood pressure. Based upon a prostate-specific antigen level of 44 ng/ml and further investigations (digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasound-guided needle biopsy, and magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound and bone scans), the patient was diagnosed with locally advanced (cT3, N0, M0) prostate cancer. Here, the urologist and the patient describe treatment from their respective viewpoints. Following discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of the various therapeutic options, radiotherapy plus hormonal therapy (bicalutamide 150 mg) was chosen as the approach that best suited the patient's lifestyle. In this review, the patient and the urologist consider the impact of the chosen treatment in terms of efficacy, tolerability and quality of life.

Late radiotherapy toxicity after prostate cancer treatment: Influence of hormonal therapy

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the impact of hormonal therapy (HT) on late gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity from external beam radiotherapy (RT).

METHODS

The records of 445 consecutive patients with prostate cancer undergoing RT with or without HT were reviewed. Late toxicity rates, using established toxicity scoring guidelines, were tabulated in the two groups and compared using the chi-square test. Ordered logit regression analyses were performed that included the major demographic, disease, and treatment factors.

RESULTS

The chi-square analyses demonstrated lower rates of GI toxicity (P = 0.013) and GU toxicity (P = 0.041) in the cohort receiving HT; this reduction in toxicity appeared to be consistent across different toxicity grades. However, on regression analysis, the only factor reaching statistical significance in predicting late GI and late GU toxicity was the radiation dose (P = 0.004 and P = 0.047, respectively). In particular, on regression analysis, HT did not reach statistical significance in predicting late GI toxicity (P = 0.229) or late GU toxicity (P = 0.910).

CONCLUSIONS

Observed late RT toxicity rates were generally similar in patients who did and did not receive HT. Thus, increased late RT toxicity should not be a major concern when deciding to add HT to RT for treatment of localized prostate cancer.

Impact of hormone therapy on acute radiotherapy toxicity in the treatment of prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To analyze the impact of neoadjuvant hormone therapy (HT) on acute gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity from radiotherapy (RT).

SCOPE

The toxicity rates of 480 consecutive prostate cancer patients were reviewed and compared using the chi2 test. Ordered logit regression analyses were performed including the major demographic, disease, and treatment factors. Although no reduction in acute GI toxicity from HT use was observed (P=0.067), a lower rate of acute GU toxicity was observed (P=0.002). No factor reached statistical significance on regression analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Observed toxicity rates were similar or lower in patients receiving HT. Thus, increased RT toxicity should not be a concern when deciding to add neoadjuvant HT to RT for prostate cancer.

Acute morbidity related to treatment volume during 3D-conformal radiation therapy for prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To investigate the relation between acute toxicity and irradiated volume in the organs at risk during three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From January to December 2001, we treated 132 prostate cancer patients to a prescribed target dose of 70 Gy. Twenty-six patients (20%) received irradiation to the prostate only (Group P), 86 patients (65%) had field arrangements encompassing the prostate and seminal vesicles (Group PSV) while 20 (15%) received modified pelvic fields (Group MPF). A four-field conformal box technique was used. Acute toxicity according to the RTOG scoring system was prospectively recorded throughout the course of treatment.

RESULTS

Overall, radiation was well tolerated with 11%, 16% and 35% Grade 2 gastro-intestinal (GI) toxicity and 19%, 34% and 35% Grade 2 or higher genito-urinary (GU) toxicity in Groups P, PSV and MPF, respectively. In univariate and multivariate analyses treatment group was a significant predictor for Grade 2 or higher acute morbidity. In multivariate logistic regression, the rectum dose-volume histogram parameters were correlated to the incidence of acute Grade 2 GI toxicity, with the fractional volumes receiving more than 37-40 Gy and above 70 Gy showing the statistically strongest correlation. The fractional bladder volume receiving more than 14-27 Gy showed the statistically strongest correlation with acute GU toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

3D-CRT radiation therapy to 70 Gy for prostate cancer was well tolerated. Only two of the 132 patients in the cohort experienced acute bladder toxicity Grade 3, none had Grade 3 rectal toxicity. Uni- and multivariate analyses indicated that the volume treated was a significant factor for the incidence of Grade 2 or higher acute morbidity.

Hormone therapy adjuvant to external beam radiotherapy for locally advanced prostate carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Hormone therapy commonly is used to treat metastatic, locally advanced, and localized prostate carcinoma. The objective of the current investigation was to determine, using the number-needed-to-treat (NNT) method, the effect of using hormone therapy to treat locally advanced disease, with consideration given to both the complications and the known advantages associated with hormone therapy.

METHODS

A literature review was performed to determine 1) the absolute benefit, based on available clinical endpoints, associated with the addition of hormone therapy to external beam radiotherapy for locally advanced prostate carcinoma; 2) the incidence of side effects of short-term and long-term hormone therapy; and 3) the stepwise progression from biochemical failure to death. A model was constructed to estimate the complication/utility-adjusted survival detriment resulting from the side effects of short-term (</= 6 months) and long-term (> 6 months) hormone therapy, and the absolute/unadjusted and complication-adjusted NNTs for the addition of short-term and long-term hormone therapy were computed. In all cases, the magnitudes and signs of the NNTs obtained were used to gauge the effect of hormone therapy.

RESULTS

The unadjusted NNTs were positive and in most cases had relatively small magnitudes (the greater the NNT, the smaller the benefit) for both short-term and long-term hormone therapy; these results were expected, and they suggested that there is a strong benefit associated with the use of hormones adjuvant to radiotherapy for locally advanced disease. Adjusted NNTs remained positive and had relatively small magnitudes even after the introduction into the analysis of complications of short-term and long-term hormone therapy. This finding, although weak with respect to the effect of short-term hormone therapy on cause-specific survival, remained robust over the range of values for utility impairment expected from short-term and long-term hormone therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The benefits of short-term and long-term hormone therapy for locally advanced prostate carcinoma appear to be significant and to outweigh the associated side effects. Long-term therapy appears to be better than short-term therapy in terms of virtually all endpoints studied, even when the increased incidence of side effects is considered. The current investigation was successful in the use of the complication-adjusted NNT method for oncologic and radiotherapeutic scenarios in which the results of randomized trials could be summarized, adjusted for treatment toxicity, and individualized to a given patient.

Impact of hormone therapy when combined with external beam radiotherapy for early-stage, intermediate-, or high-risk prostate cancer

The purpose of this investigation was to explore the potential benefit of hormone therapy in addition to external beam radiotherapy for patients with early-stage (T1-2), intermediate-(prostate-specific antigen [PSA] > 10 or Gleason score >or= 7) or high-risk (PSA > 10 and Gleason score >or= 7) prostate cancer. The charts of 412 patients with early-stage intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer treated with external beam radiotherapy with or without a 4-month total androgen blockade were reviewed. The groups were balanced with respect to age, pretreatment PSA, and stage, but differed with respect to Gleason score and radiation dose. Biochemical failure rates, as defined by the ASTRO consensus panel, were compared between those receiving and those not receiving hormones. With a median follow-up of 2.0 years, the biochemical failure rate was 12.1 versus 23.1% (p = 0.02) in favor of those receiving hormones. This difference was seen for the subgroups followed for more than 6 months (12.5 vs. 25.0%), more than 9 months (14.5 vs. 26.3%), and more than 12 months (17.3 vs. 27.0%). Thus, biochemical failure decreased with the administration of hormone therapy in this group of patients with early stage, intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer. This finding requires validation by ongoing randomized trials.

Neoadjuvant androgen deprivation and prostate gland shrinkage during conformal radiotherapy

PURPOSE

The shrinking effect of 3-month neoadjuvant androgen deprivation (NAD) on preradiotherapy prostate gland volume is well documented. However, recently, it has been shown that the cancerous prostate gland keeps shrinking up to 12 months after NAD start. Thus, if such a reduction is not taken into account, a larger than planned portion of the surrounding normal tissues might shift in the high-dose region during conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) course. The present study was undertaken to quantify this issue.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Prostate gland volume reduction between planning CT (plCT) and the last week of 3DCRT (tmtCT) was prospectively assessed in 33 consecutive patients with localized prostate carcinoma. The median time interval between plCT and tmtCT was 2.5 months (2.1-2.7 months). A single observer was asked to draw on each slice prostate gland volume as appropriate. The observer was 'blind' to the timing of CT (plCT vs. tmtCT). In order to estimate intra-observer variability, prostate gland delineation was repeated twice for each data set. Mean prostate gland change, plCT and tmtCT cumulative dose volume histogram (DVH) calculations for the rectum were analyzed for each patient. Results were correlated to AD status and its duration before plCT. Means were compared by non-parametric rank tests.

RESULTS

Based on an internal protocol, 14 patients (42%) did not receive AD, while 19 patients (58%) had undergone neoadjuvant and concomitant AD. The median duration of AD before plCT ranged from 0.2 to 6 months (median: 2.9 months). Although individual data were highly variable, compared to plCT volume, mean prostate gland volume change at the end of 3DCRT was similar for patients receiving (-7.3%) or not (-7%) androgen deprivation (P=0.77). However, within the group of patients treated with hormones, patients starting AD within 3 months from plCT had a significantly larger reduction in prostate volume (-14.2%) than patients with longer NAD duration (-1.1%, P=0.03). At tmtCT, on average, patients undergoing 3DCRT within 3 months from AD start showed an increase of the amount of rectum receiving 40-75 Gy compared to plCT values. At 40 Gy (V40) the mean difference between tmtCT and plCT was +7.5%. In the other two groups, average variations of V40-70 were within +/-2% of plCT values. However, these differences are not significant.

CONCLUSION

For patients who undergo plCT and 3DCRT shortly after AD start, prostate gland shrinkage may be substantial. In some of these patients, this might lead to an unexpected increase of the percentage of rectal wall exposed to intermediate doses.

Pre-treatment nomogram for biochemical control after neoadjuvant androgen deprivation and radical radiotherapy for clinically localised prostate cancer

Phase III studies have demonstrated the clinical benefit of adding neo-adjuvant androgen deprivation to radical radiotherapy for clinically localised prostate cancer. We have developed a nomogram to describe the probability of PSA control for patients treated in this way. Five hundred and seventeen men with clinically localised prostate cancer were treated with 3-6 months of neo-adjuvant androgen deprivation and radical radiotherapy (64Gy in 32#) between 1988 and 1998. Median presenting PSA was 20 ng x ml(-1), and 56% of patients had T3/4 disease. Multivariate analysis of pre-treatment factors was performed, and a nomogram developed to describe PSA-failure-free survival probability. At a median follow-up of 44 months, 233 men had developed PSA failure. Presenting PSA, histological grade and clinical T stage were all highly predictive of PSA failure on multivariate analysis. The nomogram score for an individual patient is given by the summation of PSA (<10=0, 10-19=16, 20-49=44, > or =50=100), grade (Gleason 2-4=0, 5-7=44, 8-10=81) and T stage (T1/2=0, T3/4=35). For a nomogram score of 0, 50, 100 and 150 points the 2 year PSA control rate was 93, 87, 75 and 54%, and the 5 year PSA control rate was 82, 67, 44 and 18%. These results are comparable to those using surgery or higher doses of radical radiotherapy alone. The nomogram illustrates the results of multivariate analysis in a visually-striking way, and facilitates comparisons with other treatment methods.

Normalization of serum testosterone levels in patients treated with neoadjuvant hormonal therapy and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the expected time to serum testosterone normalization after short-course neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (NAAD) and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for patients with localized prostate cancer and to identify pretreatment predictors that correlated with the time to testosterone normalization.

METHODS

Between 1993 and 1999, 88 patients with localized prostate cancer, treated with NAAD and external beam radiotherapy, were prospectively monitored after treatment with sequential testosterone levels. NAAD was administered before and during the entire course of radiotherapy and discontinued at the end of treatment. The median duration of NAAD was 6 months. The actuarial rate of serum testosterone normalization from the end of treatment was evaluated, and the presence or absence of androgen deprivation-related symptoms was correlated with serum testosterone levels. Symptoms assessed included weight gain, loss of libido, breast tenderness, breast enlargement, hot flashes, and fatigue.

RESULTS

Serum testosterone levels returned to the normal range in 57 (65%) of the 88 patients and failed to normalize in 31 patients (35%). The median time to normalization was 18.3 months. The actuarial rate of normalization at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months was 10%, 26%, 38%, and 59%, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, a pretreatment testosterone level in the lower range of normal was the only variable that predicted for delayed testosterone normalization after NAAD (p = 0.00047). Among 45 patients with information concerning androgen deprivation-related symptoms recorded 1 year after cessation of NAAD, 24 (53%) had normalized testosterone levels, but in 21 patients (47%), the levels had not yet returned to normal. At 1 year, only 1 (4%) of 24 patients whose testosterone level had returned to normal experienced NAAD-related symptoms compared with 14 (67%) of 21 patients who did not have normal testosterone levels (p <0.001).

CONCLUSION

Testosterone levels often remain depressed for extended periods after cessation of short-course NAAD. Lower baseline testosterone levels predict for a delay in testosterone normalization, and the persistence of symptoms related to androgen deprivation correlates with low testosterone levels.

Evolution of toxicity after conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer

The limiting factor for radiation (RT) dose-escalation is normal tissue toxicity. In dose-escalation studies, it is important to determine the factors associated with toxicity and the length of follow-up period after which a particular RT dose is considered safe. We analyzed 449 prostate cancer patients treated with RT at our institution and followed for a median of 27 months. Genitourinary (GU) and gastrointerological (GI) complications were graded and analyzed using three different statistical models. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted for factors associated with toxicity. There was no RTOG grade 4 or 5 toxicity. Only 23 patients (5%) experienced grade 3 toxicity. After treatment, there was an initial rapid decline in the risk of toxicity following treatment, followed by an increase or stabilization of the toxicity with time of follow-up. The breakpoints between the two periods were 2 y (any toxicity) and 1 y (high toxicity) for GU and 9 months (any toxicity, high toxicity) for GI. Age, dose, fraction size, duration of treatment and hospital of treatment emerge as important factors in the probability of developing toxicity. Our study shows that delivering conventional doses using conformal techniques is associated with minimal high-grade toxicity. However, even within a narrow dose range and fraction size used, differences do emerge which should lead one to be cautious in extending the results of dose escalation study to the community practice without a sufficient follow-up.

A new three-dimensional dose distribution reduction scheme for tubular organs

In tubular structures, spatial aspects of the dose distribution may be important in determining the normal tissue response. Conventional dose-volume-histograms (DVHs) and dose-surface-histograms (DSHs) lack spatial information and may not be adequate to represent the three-dimensional (3D) dose data. A new 3D dose distribution data reduction scheme which preserves its longitudinal and circumferential character is presented. Dose distributions were generated at each axial level for esophagus or rectum in 123 patients with lung cancer or prostate cancer. Dose distribution histograms at each axial level were independently analyzed along the esophageal or rectal circumference to generate dose-circumference-histogram (DCH) sheets. Two types of plots were then generated from the DCH sheet. The first considered the percentage of the circumference at each axial level receiving various doses. The second considered the minimum dose delivered to any percentage of the circumference at each axial level. The DCH as a treatment planning tool can be easily implemented in a 3D planing system and is potentially useful for the study of the relationship between the complication risk and the longitudinal and circumferential dose distributions.

[Conformal radiotherapy of prostatic cancer: a general review]

Recent progress in radiotherapeutic management of localized prostate cancer is reviewed. Clinical aspects--including dose-effect beyond 70 Gy, relative role of conformal radiation therapy techniques and of early hormonal treatment--are discussed as well as technical components--including patient immobilization, organ motion, prostate contouring, beam arrangement, 3-D treatment planning and portal imaging. The local control and biological relapse-free survival rates appear to be improved by high dose conformal radiotherapy from 20 to 30% for patients with intermediate and high risk of relapse. A benefit of overall survival is expected but not yet demonstrated. Late reactions, especially the rectal toxicity, remain moderate despite the dose escalation. However, conformal radiotherapy demands a high precision at all steps of the procedure.

Current status of androgen suppression and radiotherapy for patients with prostate cancer

Analogous to the impact of anti-estrogen therapy in breast cancer, anti-androgen therapy may have a greater impact on the castrate male with non-metastatic disease. The use of castration or a LHRH drug alone, does not appear to adequately suppress intra-prostatic DHT (Dihydrotestosterone) levels. Normal prostate elements appear to be more efficient than metastatic elements at converting DHT precursors to active DHT. Thus, blocking this step may be more critical for clinically localized disease. Laverdiere et al. reported a 2 year positive (+) biopsy rate of 65% with XRT alone compared to 28% when 3 months of NHT preceded radiotherapy, but 5% if NHT was continued for a total of 10.5 months of combined androgen blockade (CAB). Bolla et al. incorporated one month of NHT prior to XRT followed by 3 years of an LHRH drug. An improvement in local control, disease free survival and overall survival of nearly 20% was noted at 5 years. Thus far, these important studies demonstrate that a survival benefit may require long term adjuvant hormonal therapy. There is a need for further studies to define the optimal timing and duration of CAB and the role of XRT. Long term data recently provided by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) may provide insights into criteria for defining which patients are likely to benefit the most from long term CAB.

Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy in carcinoma of the prostate

The rising incidence of and mortality from prostate cancer has generated great interest in improving the results of current methods of treatment. It is well-established that large tumour volumes and positive surgical margins are correlated with higher rates of local failure and distant metastasis. Significant decreases in both tumour volume and the rates of positive surgical margins are seen with NHT. Follow-up data from one randomized trial of hormonal therapy before RT have shown significantly improved disease-free survival, but so far there has been no benefit in overall survival. However, the addition of adjuvant hormonal therapy has been reported to improve survival. The results suggest that neoadjuvant and adjuvant hormonal therapy may be a viable option in men with locally advanced prostate cancer in whom cure is probably impossible, but disease progression can potentially be slowed. What remains to be determined is whether hormonal therapy alone can produce the same results. For younger men with clinically localized prostate cancer, radical prostatectomy is increasingly the treatment of choice. Prospective randomized trials of NHT have produced impressive statistics for decreasing the incidence of positive surgical margins, but the potential to down-stage tumours remains controversial. Follow-up serum PSA measurements have thus far shown no benefit from neoadjuvant therapy. The possibility that patients who fail biochemically, whether they are from the pretreated or control group, may simply represent a subgroup with aggressive tumours that may not respond to androgen withdrawal, has yet to be proved. As more follow-up data are analysed within the next several years, there must be a clear survival advantage if NHT is to be offered as a treatment option. Despite the potential of neoadjuvant therapy, the use of androgen withdrawal before definitive surgical treatment should be limited to clinical trials until a clearer picture emerges. Some may argue that although there is no evidence of a true advantage for NHT, neither is there evidence of harm. However, it must be recognized that androgen withdrawal therapy has side-effects and adds significantly to the overall cost of treatment. Furthermore, NHT delays definitive treatment; clearly, this can be a source of anxiety for the patient and the impact on survival is unknown. Currently, the rates of pathologically organ-confined disease are high in some subsets of patients (e.g. low-stage, low-grade and low PSA) so that NHT is unlikely to have great additional benefit. Although the influence of hormones on prostate growth has been known for many decades, we are only now elucidating the biological mechanisms of hormonal therapy. Although androgen ablation therapy has been used in men with metastatic prostate cancer for more than 50 years, further research at the cellular and molecular level is essential if we are to refine treatment modalities for both localized and advanced disease. Furthermore, until we have more follow-up data from randomized clinical trials of NHT, it cannot be considered part of the standard treatment for carcinoma of the prostate. There are still too many unknown factors; only time will tell if the initial promise of NHT will be fulfilled.

The role of androgen deprivation in the definitive management of clinically localized prostate cancer treated with radiation therapy

PURPOSE

Multiple studies exploring the use of androgen deprivation given in combination with radiotherapy (RT) for localized prostate cancer have reported significant improvements in the rates of local, regional, and biochemical control (BC). The impact of this therapeutic strategy on overall and cancer specific survival (CSS) has not been established, however. We performed a MEDLINE search of all available studies on this topic to determine if any conclusions could be reached on the efficacy of this treatment approach and the patients most suitable for its application.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A MEDLINE search was conducted to obtain all articles in the English language on the use of androgen deprivation in combination with RT for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. The medical subject headings (MeSH) used to search the MEDLINE database included: a) prostatic neoplasms; b) prostatic neoplasms/radiotherapy; c) prostatic neoplasms/androgen deprivation; d) hormone therapy; e) English; and f) 1980 to 1998.

RESULTS

A total of 14 retrospective studies were identified that compared some form of androgen deprivation given in combination with RT. Most studies showed significant improvements in various measures of local/regional control and disease-free survival (DFS). Three of four studies that analyzed BC rates showed significant improvements in this endpoint but conflicting results were obtained for overall survival (OS). No study showed an improvement in CSS. Six prospective randomized trials were identified that directly compared RT with or without androgen deprivation. Again, all six studies showed improvements in some measure of local/regional control or DFS but only two studies showed an improvement in OS. One study reported a statistically significant improvement in CSS and another study showed an improvement in the rate of negative biopsies with combined treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

When all available literature on androgen withdrawal given in combination with RT for the definitive treatment of localized prostate cancer was reviewed, no definite conclusions could be reached on the impact of this treatment approach on OS and CSS. However, local/regional control, DFS, and BC were almost uniformly improved with the use of androgen withdrawal suggesting that these impressive early results may translate into improved cure rates. Data from recently initiated and completed randomized trials will be needed, however, to define the impact of this approach on cancer specific mortality and the patients most suitable for it's use.

Androgen ablation in addition to radiation therapy for prostate cancer: is there true benefit?

Prostate cancer patients may now be identified as having a high risk of failing single-modality treatment based on pretreatment prostate specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score, and palpable stage. In particular, a PSA greater than 20 ng/mL portends a biochemical failure rate of 50% to 80% when radiation therapy, surgery, or androgen ablation is administered individually. A number of randomized trials as well as retrospective data show that failure rates are significantly reduced by combining androgen ablation and radiation. The improved results, however, are complicated by the ability to salvage radiation alone-treated patients with androgen ablation and the possibility of less effective salvage (or no effective salvage in the case of permanent androgen ablation) for patients treated with androgen ablation plus radiation. Thus, survival, which is obscured by high rates of intercurrent deaths in this elderly population, is the most important end point in such studies. Two randomized trials, one from the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and one from the European Organization for Research on Treatment for Cancer (EORTC), of radiation therapy plus adjuvant (as opposed to neoadjuvant) androgen ablation have reported survival gains over radiation therapy alone. In contrast, one neoadjuvant trial from the RTOG failed to show a survival benefit when androgen ablation was added to radiation therapy. In this study, however, androgen ablation was administered for only 4 to 5 months, which may be insufficient. The weight of the evidence to date indicates a true benefit with androgen ablation plus radiation therapy over radiation therapy alone. There are clearly many unanswered questions concerning the optimal timing of androgen ablation and radiation therapy (neoadjuvant versus adjuvant), length of time that androgen ablation should be administered (6 months versus 3 years versus permanent), type of androgen ablation (total androgen ablation or not), and appropriate patient population (definition of high risk). The planned future clinical trials will address many of these issues; however, the full potential of this approach requires an understanding of the fundamental mechanisms involved.

Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and dose escalation: where do we stand?

Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy is an effective means of delivering high doses of radiation with enhanced precision. Several institutions have gained substantial experience using this modality for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. Reports from these centers have demonstrated not only excellent tolerance despite the administration of higher radiation doses, but improved biochemical and local control outcomes as well. Meticulous attention to treatment technique and dose volume histogram analysis are critical for the safe implementation of these higher doses. The emergence of intensity-modulated treatment planning has provided the opportunity at our institution to further escalate the radiation dose to 86.4 Gy while still respecting the surrounding normal tissue tolerance. Phase I studies will need to continue to define more clearly the maximal dose of radiation that can be delivered safely with this modality. Current studies indicate a direct correlation between dose and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) relapse-free survival response for patients with intermediate and high-risk prognostic features. These patients likely represent the ideal cohort for future studies designed to investigate the impact of dose on biochemical and disease-free survival outcome.

Target volume definition in radiation therapy

Target volume definition in radiation therapy is a broad field of interdisciplinary research. We give a brief history of clinical research in this field and outline some remarkable steps which led to the well-defined target volume concepts. The challenges in target volume definition for high-precision conformal radiation therapy are discussed, and possibilities of improving target volume definition, such as the integration of modern imaging modalities and the use of computer-based systems to support the radiation oncologist are indicated, as well as novel techniques for increasing the accuracy of patient positioning. All these tools should be evaluated with regard to their potential for increasing the therapeutic ratio and, as appropriate, should be implemented in clinical practice. However, target volume definition is a complex process influenced by many factors, currently under investigation. While questions remain in this field, and the impact of the influencing factors is not defined, the process of target volume definition should remain the subject of clinical research.

Neoadjuvant androgen ablation prior to radiotherapy for prostate cancer: reducing the potential morbidity of therapy

OBJECTIVES

To determine the impact of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) prior to conformal radiotherapy on the reduction of volume of normal tissue structures exposed to high doses of radiation therapy and to evaluate the overall late toxicity and response to treatment among patients treated with this approach.

METHODS

Among 214 patients treated with neoadjuvant leuprolide acetate and flutamide for 3 months prior to three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), 45 patients were prospectively evaluated with detailed dose-volume histogram (DVH) analyses to determine the extent of improvement of the geometry of the target volume after NHT. All patients underwent simulation and conformal treatment planning before and after NHT, and the pre- and posthormone DVH calculations for all normal tissue structures were compared for each patient. In addition, toxicity and response to therapy were evaluated in the 214 patients treated with this combined approach.

RESULTS

In the 45 patients evaluated, the median reduction of the rectal and bladder volumes receiving 95% of the prescription dose (D95) were 18% and 46%, respectively, while 91% showed a reduction of small bowel volume in a range of 27% to 100% of the prehormonal values. Among the entire group of 214 patients treated with NHT and 3D-CRT, no grade 3 or 4 toxicity was observed with a median follow-up of 15 months after 3D-CRT. The 3-year actuarial grade 2 late gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity rates were 6% and 18%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy effectively reduces the volume of normal tissue exposed to high radiation doses in the majority of treated patients and decreases the potential morbidity of therapy.

The effect of treatment positioning on normal tissue dose in patients with prostate cancer treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To prospectively assess the effect of supine vs. prone treatment position on the dose to normal tissues in prostate cancer patients treated with the three-dimensional conformal technique.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twenty-six patients underwent three-dimensional treatment planning in both the supine and prone treatment positions. The planning target volume and normal tissue structures were outlined on each CAT scan slice, and treatment plans were compared to assess the effect of treatment position on the volume of rectum, bladder, and bowel exposed to the high dose of irradiation.

RESULTS

The average dose to the rectal wall and the V95 (volume of rectal wall receiving at least 95% of the prescription dose) for the prone position were 64 and 24% of the prescription dose, respectively, compared to 72 and 29%, respectively, for the supine position (p < 0.05). When the average rectal wall dose was used as an endpoint, 14 of the 26 patients (54%) had an advantage for the prone position compared to 1 (4%) who demonstrated an advantage for the supine position (p < 0.0002). Similarly, when V95 of the rectal wall was used as a measure of comparison, 15 patients (58%) had an advantage for the prone position compared to 1 (4%) who demonstrated an advantage for the supine position (p < 0.0002). In 13 patients (50%), a change from supine to the prone position was associated with reduction of the V95 to levels < 30% of the prescription dose compared to 3 patients (11%) in whom such an advantage resulted from change of the prone to the supine position (p < 0.005). The effect of treatment position on the rectal wall dose was most pronounced in the region of the seminal vesicles. An increased volume of bowel was also noted in the supine position. The treatment position, however, had no significant impact on the dose to the bladder wall.

CONCLUSIONS

Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer in the prone position is associated with significant reduction of the dose to the rectum and bowel resulting in an improvement in the therapeutic ratio.