1
|
Michael M, Wolf BJ, Klinge-Strahl A, Jeschke M, Moser T, Dieter A. Devising a framework of optogenetic coding in the auditory pathway: Insights from auditory midbrain recordings. Brain Stimul 2023; 16:1486-1500. [PMID: 37778456 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2023.09.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Revised: 09/19/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Cochlear implants (CIs) restore activity in the deafened auditory system via electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. As the spread of electric current in biological tissues is rather broad, the spectral information provided by electrical CIs is limited. Optogenetic stimulation of the auditory nerve has been suggested for artificial sound coding with improved spectral selectivity, as light can be conveniently confined in space. Yet, the foundations for optogenetic sound coding strategies remain to be established. Here, we parametrized stimulus-response-relationships of the auditory pathway in gerbils for optogenetic stimulation. Upon activation of the auditory pathway by waveguide-based optogenetic stimulation of the spiral ganglion, we recorded neuronal activity of the auditory midbrain, in which neural representations of spectral, temporal, and intensity information can be found. Screening a wide range of optical stimuli and taking the properties of optical CI emitters into account, we aimed to optimize stimulus paradigms for potent and energy-efficient activation of the auditory pathway. We report that efficient optogenetic coding builds on neural integration of millisecond stimuli built from microsecond light pulses, which optimally accommodate power-efficient laser diode operation. Moreover, we performed an activity-level-dependent comparison of optogenetic and acoustic stimulation in order to estimate the dynamic range and the maximal stimulation intensity amenable to single channel optogenetic sound encoding, and indicate that it complies well with speech comprehension in a typical conversation (65 dB). Our results provide a first framework for the development of coding strategies for future optogenetic hearing restoration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Michael
- Institute for Auditory Neuroscience and InnerEarLab, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Bettina Julia Wolf
- Institute for Auditory Neuroscience and InnerEarLab, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075, Göttingen, Germany; Auditory Neuroscience and Optogenetics Laboratory, German Primate Center, 37077, Göttingen, Germany; Cluster of Excellence "Multiscale Bioimaging: from Molecular Machines to Networks of Excitable Cells" (MBExC), University of Göttingen, 37075, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Astrid Klinge-Strahl
- Institute for Auditory Neuroscience and InnerEarLab, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075, Göttingen, Germany; Department of Otolaryngology, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Marcus Jeschke
- Institute for Auditory Neuroscience and InnerEarLab, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075, Göttingen, Germany; Auditory Neuroscience and Optogenetics Laboratory, German Primate Center, 37077, Göttingen, Germany; Cognitive Hearing in Primates (CHiP) Group, German Primate Center, 37077, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Tobias Moser
- Institute for Auditory Neuroscience and InnerEarLab, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075, Göttingen, Germany; Auditory Neuroscience and Optogenetics Laboratory, German Primate Center, 37077, Göttingen, Germany; Cluster of Excellence "Multiscale Bioimaging: from Molecular Machines to Networks of Excitable Cells" (MBExC), University of Göttingen, 37075, Göttingen, Germany; Auditory Neuroscience and Synaptic Nanophysiology Group, Max Planck Institute for Multidisciplinary Science, Göttingen, Germany.
| | - Alexander Dieter
- Institute for Auditory Neuroscience and InnerEarLab, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075, Göttingen, Germany; Göttingen Graduate Center for Neurosciences, Biophysic, and Molecular Biosciences, 37077, Göttingen, Germany; Department of Neurophysiology, MCTN, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Guérit F, Marozeau J, Epp B, Carlyon RP. Effect of the Relative Timing between Same-Polarity Pulses on Thresholds and Loudness in Cochlear Implant Users. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2020; 21:497-510. [PMID: 32833160 PMCID: PMC7644659 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-020-00767-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2020] [Accepted: 07/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The effect of the relative timing between pairs of same-polarity monophasic pulses has been studied extensively in single-neuron animal studies and has revealed fundamental properties of the neurons. For human cochlear implant listeners, the requirement to use charge-balanced stimulation and the typical use of symmetric, biphasic pulses limits such measures, because currents of opposite polarities interact at the level of the neural membrane. Here, we propose a paradigm to study same-polarity summation of currents while keeping the stimulation charge-balanced within a short time window. We used pairs of mirrored pseudo-monophasic pulses (a long-low phase followed by a short-high phase for the first pulse and a short-high phase followed by a long-low phase for the second pulse). We assumed that most of the excitation would stem from the two adjacent short-high phases, which had the same polarity. The inter-pulse interval between the short-high phases was varied from 0 to 345 μs. The inter-pulse interval had a significant effect on the perceived loudness, and this effect was consistent with both passive (membrane-related) and active (ion-channel-related) neuronal mechanisms contributing to facilitation. Furthermore, the effect of interval interacted with the polarity of the pulse pairs. At threshold, there was an effect of polarity, but, surprisingly, no effect of interval nor an interaction between the two factors. We discuss possible peripheral origins of these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- François Guérit
- Hearing Systems Group, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, 352 Ørsteds Plads, 2800, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
- Cambridge Hearing Group, MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, United Kingdom.
| | - Jeremy Marozeau
- Hearing Systems Group, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, 352 Ørsteds Plads, 2800, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Bastian Epp
- Hearing Systems Group, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, 352 Ørsteds Plads, 2800, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Robert P Carlyon
- Cambridge Hearing Group, MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Macherey O, Carlyon RP, van Wieringen A, Wouters J. A dual-process integrator-resonator model of the electrically stimulated human auditory nerve. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2007; 8:84-104. [PMID: 17221144 PMCID: PMC2538421 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-006-0066-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2006] [Accepted: 11/03/2006] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
A phenomenological dual-process model of the electrically stimulated human auditory nerve is presented and compared to threshold and loudness data from cochlear implant users. The auditory nerve is modeled as two parallel processes derived from linearized equations of conductance-based models. The first process is an integrator, which dominates stimulation for short-phase duration biphasic pulses and high-frequency sinusoidal stimuli. It has a relatively short time constant (0.094 ms) arising from the passive properties of the membrane. The second process is a resonator, which induces nonmonotonic functions of threshold vs frequency with minima around 80 Hz. The ion channel responsible for this trend has a relatively large relaxation time constant of about 1 ms. Membrane noise is modeled as a Gaussian noise, and loudness sensation is assumed to relate to the probability of firing of a neuron during a 20-ms rectangular window. Experimental psychophysical results obtained in seven previously published studies can be interpreted with this model. The model also provides a physiologically based account of the nonmonotonic threshold vs frequency functions observed in biphasic and sinusoidal stimulation, the large threshold decrease obtained with biphasic pulses having a relatively long inter-phase gap and the effects of asymmetric pulses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivier Macherey
- ExpORL, Department of Neurosciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Herestraat 49 bus 721, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
van Wieringen A, Carlyon RP, Macherey O, Wouters J. Effects of pulse rate on thresholds and loudness of biphasic and alternating monophasic pulse trains in electrical hearing. Hear Res 2006; 220:49-60. [PMID: 16904278 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2006.06.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2006] [Revised: 06/06/2006] [Accepted: 06/27/2006] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Detection thresholds and most comfortable loudnesses (MCLs) were determined as a function of pulse rate for standard biphasic pulse trains (BP) and for anodic and cathodic monophasic phases alternating at fixed intervals (ALT-m). Three different phase durations were examined. With a 100-micros phase duration, thresholds for the ALT-m stimulus were substantially (up to 12 dB) lower than for the BP stimuli at relatively low rates (200 pps), but were similar to the BP thresholds at high rates (1000 pps). Thresholds for BP pulse trains decreased monotonically with increasing rate, whereas the function for ALT-m waveforms was non-monotonic with a maximum between 400 and 1000 pps. These trends occurred for three different cochlear implant devices, different electrode configurations, and, generally, for different phase durations (10.8, 25, and 100 micros/phase). However, at the shorter phase durations, thresholds remained lower for the ALT-m stimulus, even at 5000 pps, the highest rate studied. Dynamic ranges of the BP pulse trains increased with increasing rate, irrespective of the phase duration under test, but for the ALT-m stimuli this was only true at the shorter phase durations tested. At a 100-mus phase duration, dynamic ranges for the ALT-m waveforms did not differ significantly as a function of rate. The results confirm previous reports that delaying charge recovery, in this case by switching from a BP to an ALT-m wave shape, can substantially reduce thresholds [Van Wieringen, A., Carlyon, R.P., Laneau, J., Wouters, J., 2005. Effects of waveform shape on human sensitivity to electrical stimulation of the inner ear. Hear. Res. 200, 73-86; Carlyon, R.P., van Wieringen, A., Deeks, J.M., Long, C.J., Lyzenga, J, Wouters, J., 2005. Effect of inter-phase gap on the sensitivity of cochlear implant users to electrical stimulation. Hear. Res. 205, 210-224]. However, at high pulse rates, this advantage only occurs at short phase durations. In addition, we show that the complex interaction between the effects of pulse shape, rate, and phase duration on thresholds can be captured by the simple linear model described by Carlyon et al.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Astrid van Wieringen
- ExpORL, Department of Neurosciences, KULeuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Beitel RE, Snyder RL, Schreiner CE, Raggio MW, Leake PA. Electrical cochlear stimulation in the deaf cat: comparisons between psychophysical and central auditory neuronal thresholds. J Neurophysiol 2000; 83:2145-62. [PMID: 10758124 DOI: 10.1152/jn.2000.83.4.2145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Cochlear prostheses for electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve ("electrical hearing") can provide auditory capacity for profoundly deaf adults and children, including in many cases a restored ability to perceive speech without visual cues. A fundamental challenge in auditory neuroscience is to understand the neural and perceptual mechanisms that make rehabilitation of hearing possible in these deaf humans. We have developed a feline behavioral model that allows us to study behavioral and physiological variables in the same deaf animals. Cats deafened by injection of ototoxic antibiotics were implanted with either a monopolar round window electrode or a multichannel scala tympani electrode array. To evaluate the effects of perceptually significant electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve on the central auditory system, an animal was trained to avoid a mild electrocutaneous shock when biphasic current pulses (0.2 ms/phase) were delivered to its implanted cochlea. Psychophysical detection thresholds and electrical auditory brain stem response (EABR) thresholds were estimated in each cat. At the conclusion of behavioral testing, acute physiological experiments were conducted, and threshold responses were recorded for single neurons and multineuronal clusters in the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus (ICC) and the primary auditory cortex (A1). Behavioral and neurophysiological thresholds were evaluated with reference to cochlear histopathology in the same deaf cats. The results of the present study include: 1) in the cats implanted with a scala tympani electrode array, the lowest ICC and A1 neural thresholds were virtually identical to the behavioral thresholds for intracochlear bipolar stimulation; 2) behavioral thresholds were lower than ICC and A1 neural thresholds in each of the cats implanted with a monopolar round window electrode; 3) EABR thresholds were higher than behavioral thresholds in all of the cats (mean difference = 6.5 dB); and 4) the cumulative number of action potentials for a sample of ICC neurons increased monotonically as a function of the amplitude and the number of stimulating biphasic pulses. This physiological result suggests that the output from the ICC may be integrated spatially across neurons and temporally integrated across pulses when the auditory nerve array is stimulated with a train of biphasic current pulses. Because behavioral thresholds were lower and reaction times were faster at a pulse rate of 30 pps compared with a pulse rate of 2 pps, spatial-temporal integration in the central auditory system was presumably reflected in psychophysical performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R E Beitel
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143-0732, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Miller AL, Smith DW, Pfingst BE. Across-species comparisons of psychophysical detection thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea: II. Strength-duration functions for single, biphasic pulses. Hear Res 1999; 135:47-55. [PMID: 10491953 DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(99)00089-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
This paper compares psychophysical detection threshold data (new and previously published) for pulsatile electrical stimulation of the deafened inner ear, obtained from different human and nonhuman subjects. Subjects were grouped according to species. Other variables, however, such as the electrode array type and method of deafening, varied within and across species. Detection threshold levels and slopes of threshold versus phase duration functions for presentations of single, biphasic pulsatile stimuli (strength-duration functions) were compared for humans, macaques, cats, and guinea pigs. For bipolar stimulation, statistically significant differences in threshold level were observed between human subjects and all other species. The species difference did not depend on the phase duration tested. For monopolar stimulation, only nonhuman species were tested. Effects of electrode configuration on both the level and slope of psychophysical strength-duration functions were statistically significant across nonhuman species, but there was not a statistically significant interaction between species and electrode configuration. The similarity in function shape and relative paucity of significant differences in psychophysical functions across species support the continued use of multiple species for cochlear implant research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A L Miller
- Kresge Hearing Research Institute, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor 48109-0506, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
McKay CM, McDermott HJ. The perceptual effects of current pulse duration in electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 1999; 106:998-1009. [PMID: 10462805 DOI: 10.1121/1.428052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
In cochlear implants employing pulsatile stimulation, loudness is controlled by current amplitude and/or pulse duration. Five experiments were conducted with cochlear implantees to investigate the hypothesis that perceptual effects other than loudness result from changes in pulse duration for durations from 50 to 266 microseconds. In experiment 1, five subjects' ability to discriminate equally loud pulse trains employing differing pulse durations was measured at four electrode positions. In 11 of the 20 cases, subjects could significantly discriminate these stimuli. In experiments 2 and 3, discrimination was measured of dual-electrode stimuli which differed in overall temporal pattern but had an equal temporal pattern on each of the individual electrodes (separated by 0 to 9 mm). Discrimination was compared for stimuli employing short or long pulse durations and, in experiment 3, employing different pulse durations on each electrode. When the pulse duration was longer, six out of seven subjects could either combine temporal information across electrode positions at wider electrode separations (experiment 2) or had better discrimination at the same electrode separation (experiment 3). This result was consistent with the hypothesis that longer pulse durations result in a greater spread of excitation than equally loud stimuli using shorter pulse durations. In experiment 4, pulse rate discrimination was compared for stimuli with differing pulse durations, and in four out of five subjects, there was no effect of pulse duration. Finally, the dB change in current per doubling of pulse duration for threshold and equally loud stimuli was calculated for nine subjects (52 electrodes). Values ranged from -5.9 to -2.0 dB/doubling, and were significantly correlated with the absolute intensity of the stimulus. This result was hypothesized to be due to a relationship between the neural charging characteristics and the distance of the excited neural elements from the electrode.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C M McKay
- University of Melbourne, Department of Otolaryngology, Parkville, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Miller AL, Smith DW, Pfingst BE. Across-species comparisons of psychophysical detection thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea: I. Sinusoidal stimuli. Hear Res 1999; 134:89-104. [PMID: 10452379 DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(99)00072-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Several species have been, and continue to be, used as subjects in studies of electrical stimulation of the cochlea. Few attempts, however, have been made to determine if data obtained from different species are quantitatively or qualitatively similar. The present work compares psychophysical absolute detection threshold vs. frequency functions for sinusoidal stimuli obtained from humans, nonhuman primates, cats, and guinea pigs. Threshold data for monopolar and bipolar electrode configurations from both previously published and unpublished studies are compared. In general, within all four species, significant intersubject variation in detection threshold level was found, but slopes of threshold vs. frequency functions were relatively well conserved within a species, under the conditions studied. With one exception (cat bipolar stimulation), threshold functions reached a minimum at or near 100 Hz across species and electrode configurations. In all cases, thresholds were significantly lower for monopolar, as compared with bipolar, configurations. Statistically, there were no significant differences in absolute threshold level across species. Threshold levels increased with frequency above 100 Hz at a rate of 3.0-7.9 dB/octave, depending on both electrode configuration and species. Slopes were steeper for monopolar than for bipolar configurations. When slopes were averaged between 200 and 2000 Hz, no statistically significant differences in overall slopes were found, nor was there a significant interaction between electrode configuration and species. There were, however, consistent species differences within more restricted regions of the function. Human functions for both monopolar and bipolar stimulation were steeper than all animal functions in the range of 100-300 Hz. Within this range, the differences between slopes for human and nonhuman subjects were statistically significant. In addition, differences were noted in the frequency at which slope decreased, with slopes for nonhuman subjects showing the decrease at higher frequencies than did those for human subjects. These differences may be true species differences, or may reflect the influence of confounding variables associated with each experimental-subject model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A L Miller
- Kresge Hearing Research Institute, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor 48109-0506, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
McKay CM, McDermott HJ. Loudness perception with pulsatile electrical stimulation: the effect of interpulse intervals. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 1998; 104:1061-1074. [PMID: 9714925 DOI: 10.1121/1.423316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
The effect of interpulse intervals on the perception of loudness of biphasic current pulse trains was investigated in eight adult cochlear implantees at three different stimulus levels encompassing the psychophysical dynamic range. Equal-loudness contours and thresholds were obtained for stimuli in which two biphasic pulses were presented in a fixed repetition period (4 and 20 ms), and also for single-pulse/period stimuli with rates varying between 20 and 750 Hz. All stimuli were of 500-ms duration, and the phase durations of each pulse were 100 microseconds or less. The results of these experiments were consistent with predictions of a three-stage model of loudness perception, consisting of a peripheral refractory effect function, a sliding central integration time window, and a central equal-loudness decision device. Application of the model to the data allowed the estimation of neural refractory characteristics of the subjects' remaining peripheral neural population. The average neural spike probability for a 50-Hz stimulus was predicted to be about 0.77, with an associated neural refractory time of 7.3 ms. These predictions did not vary systematically with level, implying that the effect of increasing current level on loudness results more from recruitment of neurons than from any increase in average spike probability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C M McKay
- University of Melbourne, Department of Otolaryngology, Parkville, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
Interactions between pulse separation and pulse polarity order were examined using psychophysical studies of electrical detection thresholds in nonhuman primates. Subjects were trained using acoustic stimuli, then deafened in one ear and implanted with an electrode array for electrical stimulation of the cochlea. Threshold vs pulse separation functions for trains of biphasic electrical pulses were compared for constant and alternating leading phase polarity. When leading phase polarity was held constant, threshold vs pulse separation functions were nonmonotonic (U-shaped). Small polarity-dependent (cathodic vs anodic leading phase) differences in absolute thresholds were observed at long pulse separations, but function shape was independent of leading phase. When leading phase polarity alternated, there was a pronounced reduction in thresholds at short pulse separations (below about 1 ms), resulting in monotonically increasing threshold vs pulse separation functions. At long pulse separations, functions for alternating and constant polarity stimuli were similar. Polarity effects were most apparent for longer duration trains (20 pulses) at long pulse durations (1-2 ms/phase). For stimuli consisting of only two biphasic pulses, alternating polarity effects depended on whether cathodic or anodic phases were adjacent. The neural mechanisms underlying these effects probably include refractory properties and/or residual potentials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A L Miller
- Kresge Hearing Research Institute, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor 48109-0506, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|