Identification of species-specific, non-cross-reactive proteins of Borrelia burgdorferi

Laboratory Diagnosis of Lyme Borreliosis

Lyme borreliosis is caused by a growing list of related, yet distinct, spirochetes with complex biology and sophisticated immune evasion mechanisms. It may result in a range of clinical manifestations involving different organ systems, and can lead to persistent sequelae in a subset of cases. The pathogenesis of Lyme borreliosis is incompletely understood, and laboratory diagnosis, the focus of this review, requires considerable understanding to interpret the results correctly. Direct detection of the infectious agent is usually not possible or practical, necessitating a continued reliance on serologic testing. Still, some important advances have been made in the area of diagnostics, and there are many promising ideas for future assay development. This review summarizes the state of the art in laboratory diagnostics for Lyme borreliosis, provides guidance in test selection and interpretation, and highlights future directions.

Evaluation of the recombinant VlsE-based liaison chemiluminescence immunoassay for detection of Borrelia burgdorferi and diagnosis of Lyme disease

Recent efforts to improve the serologic diagnosis of Lyme disease have included the use of a synthetic peptide (C6) that reproduces the sequence of invariable region 6 of VlsE, the variable surface antigen of Borrelia burgdorferi. In the present study, the diagnostic performance of DiaSorin's recombinant VlsE-based chemiluminescence immunoassay in 1,947 human serum samples was evaluated. Sensitivity was determined using two serum panels from the CDC. For panel I, we observed sensitivities of 68.4% and 75.6% for subjects with early, localized (n=19) or disseminated (n=41) disease, respectively. For panel II, we observed sensitivities of 61.5% and 100% for subjects with early (n=26) or late-stage (n=11) disease, respectively. We observed a specificity of 99.5% for healthy donors (n=600) living either in regions of the United States where the disease is endemic or in regions where it is not endemic. Overall, specificity among 207 potentially cross-reactive sera from subjects who had other spirochetal infections, nonspirochetal infections including bacterial and viral infections, or autoimmune or neurologic disease; who were positive for rheumatoid factor or anti-mouse antibodies; or who had been previously vaccinated for Lyme disease was 93.7%. In a direct comparison of 1,038 prospectively collected samples for Lyme disease testing we observed a relative sensitivity of 70%, a relative specificity of 99.1%, and an overall agreement of 97.1% between the DiaSorin recombinant VlsE chemiluminescence immunoassay and the Immunetics peptide-based C6 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and immunoblot analysis for detection of antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi in dogs. The impact of serum absorption with homologous and heterologous bacteriae

Sera from 665 apparently healthy dogs were examined for antibodies to the Lyme disease spirochete Borrelia (B.) burgdorferi by using an ELISA with a whole cell sonicate of B. burgdorferi sensu stricto reference strain B31 (ATCC 35210) as antigen. To discover false positive reactions due to the unsatisfactory specificity of conventional enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for B. burgdorferi, sera were absorbed in parallel with both B. burgdorferi and a heterologous sorbent consisting of whole cells of Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium, and eight serovars of Leptospira interrogans. The difference between optical densities obtained in the ELISA after serum absorption with the heterologous sorbent and the B. burgdorferi sorbent was defined as a new value, "ODdiff", for ELISA reactivity specific for B. burgdorferi. ELISA results were confirmed by immunoblot studies. By testing unabsorbed sera, 48 of 665 serum samples (7.2%) were considered ELISA positive. 37 of these 48 sera (77.1%) were apparently false positive: here a similar reduction of ELISA reactivity was obtained after absorption with B. burgdorferi antigen and with the heterologous sorbent (ODdiff approximately equal to 0). None of these 37 sera gave immunoblot patterns characteristic for canine B. burgdorferi infection.

Comparison of four immunoserologic assays for detection of antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi in patients with culture-positive erythema migrans

In view of the significant sequelae associated with Lyme borreliosis, there is a need for timely and accurate diagnosis of erythema migrans (EM). Although Borrelia burgdorferi can be cultured from biopsies of EM lesions, immunodiagnostic testing is more widely available. Four immunoserologic methods were studied by using the sera of 51 patients with EM lesions that were culture positive for B. burgdorferi. Nineteen patients had single primary lesions, and thirty-two had multiple secondary lesions. At the time of biopsy, 40 patients, 8 with primary lesions and all patients with secondary lesions, were seropositive by an immunoglobulin M (IgM) indirect fluorescent-antibody (IgM IFA) test (Bion Enterprises). Twenty-three patients were seropositive by a whole-cell fluorescence enzyme immunoassay (EIA) (BioWhittaker, Inc.), twenty-two were positive by immunoblotting (ViroStat, Inc.), and one was positive by a P39 recombinant EIA (P39 EIA) (General Biometrics, Inc.). Sera from various patient control groups were tested: rheumatoid arthritis (n = 19), infectious mononucleosis (n = 20), systemic lupus (n = 22), syphilis (n = 13), streptococcal sequelae (n = 20), and healthy subjects (n = 16). None of these sera reacted with the IgM IFA test or P39 EIA. Fifteen reacted with the fluorescence EIA. We conclude that the IgM IFA test is an effective and reliable assay for the diagnosis of EM, particularly for patients with secondary lesions. Immunoblot, fluorescence EIA, and P39 EIA lack the sensitivity to reliably diagnose EM.

Recombinant immunoblot in the serodiagnosis of Lyme borreliosis. Comparison with indirect immunofluorescence and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

A recombinant immunoblot was developed for detection of IgM and IgG antibodies in patients with Lyme borreliosis. The recombinant antigens were the chromosomal-encoded Borrelia burgdorferi proteins p100, the flagellin and an internal flagellin fragment thereof as well as the plasmid-encoded outer surface proteins A (OspA) and C (OspC). A panel of 144 sera from patients with Lyme borreliosis (erythema migrans, n = 31; neuroborreliosis state II, n = 60; Lyme arthritis, n = 24 and acrodermatitis chronica atrophicans, n = 19) have been investigated and the results have been compared to the immunofluorescence absorption test (IFA-ABS) and to two different enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays [the flagellin ELISA and a newly developed ELISA (OGP-ELISA)]. The two ELISAs were comparable in sensitivity, whereas the IFA-ABS was less sensitive for IgM antibody but equally sensitive for IgG antibody detection. Immunoblot analysis revealed that IgG antibodies are mainly reactive with p100 and the internal flagellin fragment (sensitivity 51% and 32%, respectively) and rarely with OspC (14%). All patients with late Lyme borreliosis had IgG antibodies against the p100. IgM antibodies were predominantly directed against OspC (43%) and in a lower extent against the internal flagellin fragment and p100 (15% and 13%, respectively). The complete flagellin was not useful due to a high number of unspecific reactions with control sera and the OspA was only exceptionally reactive in Lyme borreliosis patients. The sensitivity of IgM antibody detection could be increased in cases with early Lyme borreliosis from 46% to 65% when the OspC blot was performed in addition to the flagellin ELISA, or from 56% to 65% when performed in addition to the OGP-ELISA. The recombinant blot is, therefore, a valuable diagnostic test to increase sensitivity of early antibody detection and is regarded as a valuable confirmatory test also in late disease.