Improved cardiac risk stratification in major vascular surgery with dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography

Positive Preoperative Stress Test is Associated with Increased Risk of Postoperative Myocardial Infarction in Patients Undergoing Aortoiliac Reconstruction for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia

BACKGROUND

Aortofemoral or aortoiliac bypasses (AFBs/AIBs) are considered the gold standard treatment for patients with aortoiliac occlusive disease. Myocardial infarction (MI) is a postoperative risk in AFB/AIB surgeries and preoperative stress test (PST) is frequently utilized to inform operative planning and preoperative risk discussions. The aim of this study is to assess the utility of PST in determining outcomes following AFB/AIB in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI).

METHODS

This is a retrospective study from Vascular Quality Initiative database. Patients undergoing AFB/AIB for chronic limb-threatening ischemia during 2009-2023 were stratified by PST result. Primary outcomes included postoperative MI and 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital death, in-hospital death/MI, postoperative respiratory complications, postoperative congestive heart failure, intensive care unit stay > 3 days, and 1-year mortality. Logistic and Cox regressions were used for multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

The study included 2 cohorts of patients: negative (N = 1,809, 81.2%) and positive PST (N = 420, 18.8%). The patients with positive PST had increased rate of postoperative MI compared to the patients with negative PST (6.7% vs. 2.9%, P < 0.001). The rate of 30-day mortality was greater for patients with positive PST but the difference was not significant (3.8% vs. 2.9%, P = 0.315). After adjusting for potential confounders, positive PST was associated with increased risk of postoperative MI (adjusted odds ratio = 1.89 [95% confidence interval: 1.04-3.43], P = 0.038). However, positive PST was not associated with 30-day mortality. Pulmonary complications, congestive heart failure, and intensive care unit stay >3 days were also not associated with PST result. The overall survival rate at 1-year was 93.3% and 92.0% for patients with negative and positive PSTs (P = 0.343), respectively. After adjusting for potential confounders, postoperative MI was associated with increased hazards of death at 1 year (adjusted hazard ratio = 3.62 [95% confidence interval: 2.21-5.92], P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study emphasizes the important of appropriate preoperative planning. A positive stress test before open aortic reconstruction for aortoiliac occlusive disease is associated with increased risk of postoperative MI. Although this was neither associated with increased risk of 30-day nor 1-year mortality, the negative impact of MI on patient functionality, quality of life, and 1-year death cannot be ignored.

Echocardiography, an Indispensable Tool for the Management of Diabetics, with or without Coronary Artery Disease, in Clinical Practice

Diabetes mellitus is a major factor contributing to the development of cardiovascular disease. As morbidity and mortality rates rise dramatically, when target organ damage develops pre-symptomatic assessment is critical for the management of diabetic patients. Echocardiography is a noninvasive and reproducible method that may aid in risk stratification and in evaluation of treatment effects. The aim of this review is to analyze the echocardiographic techniques which can detect early alteration in cardiac function in patients with diabetes.

Clinical Utility of Stress Echocardiography in Remote Indigenous and Non-Indigenous Populations: A 10-Year Study in Central Australia

BACKGROUND

Remote Central Australia has a large Indigenous population and a significant burden of cardiovascular disease. Stress echocardiography has been previously validated as a useful investigation for long-term prognostication. However, there are no prior studies assessing its utility in remote or Indigenous populations.

METHOD

Consecutive individuals undergoing stress echocardiography in Central Australia between 2007 and 2017 were included. Stress echocardiography was performed and reported via standard protocols. Individuals were followed up for all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

One-thousand and eight patients (1,008) (54% Indigenous Australian) were included. After a mean follow-up of 3.5±2.4 years, 54 (5%) patients were deceased. Overall, 797 (79%) patients had no abnormalities during rest or stress echocardiography, with no difference according to ethnicity (p>0.05). In patients with a normal test, annual mortality averaged 1.3% over 5 years of follow-up, with annual mortality significantly higher in Indigenous compared to non-Indigenous individuals (1.8% vs 0.6% respectively). In those with an abnormal test, annual mortality was 4.4% vs 1.3% in Indigenous and non-Indigenous individuals respectively. Increasing age, Indigenous ethnicity and cardiometabolic comorbidities were associated with mortality in univariate analyses (p<0.05 for all). In multivariate models, only chronic kidney disease remained predictive of mortality, with other associations (including Indigenous ethnicity) becoming attenuated.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to report on the use of stress echocardiography in a remote or Indigenous population. A normal stress echocardiogram in remote Indigenous individuals was able to identify a lower risk group of patients in this setting. Although Indigenous individuals with a normal test still had a higher annual rate of mortality compared to non-Indigenous individuals, this association appeared to be mediated by cardiometabolic comorbidities.

Pre-operative stress testing in the evaluation of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Pre-operative stress testing is widely used to evaluate patients for non-cardiac surgeries. However, its value in predicting peri-operative mortality is uncertain. The objective of this study is to assess the type and quality of available evidence in a comprehensive and statistically rigorous evaluation regarding the effectiveness of pre-operative stress testing in reducing 30-day post -operative mortality following non -cardiac surgery.

Methods

The databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases (from inception to January 27, 2016) were searched for all studies in English. We included studies with pre-operative stress testing prior to 10 different non-cardiac surgery among adults and excluded studies with sample size<15. The data on study characteristics, methodology and outcomes were extracted independently by two observers and checked by two other observers. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. We performed random effects meta-analysis to estimate relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) in two-group comparison and pooled the rates for stress test alone. Heterogeneity was assessed using I² and methodological quality of studies using Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. The predefined protocol was registered in PROSPERO #CRD42016049212.

Results

From 1807 abstracts, 79 studies were eligible (297,534 patients): 40 had information on 30-day mortality, of which 6 studies compared stress test versus no stress test. The risk of 30-day mortality was not significant in the comparison of stress testing versus none (RR: 0.79, 95% CI = 0.35–1.80) along with weak evidence for heterogeneity. For the studies that evaluated stress testing without a comparison group, the pooled rates are 1.98% (95% CI = 1.25–2.85) with a high heterogeneity. There was evidence of potential publication bias and small study effects.

Conclusions

Despite substantial interest and research over the past 40 years to predict 30-day mortality risk among patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery, the current body of evidence is insufficient to derive a definitive conclusion as to whether stress testing leads to reduced peri-operative mortality.

Cardiac Screening in the Noncardiac Surgery Patient

This article will address common cardiac conditions that require evaluation prior to noncardiac surgery, characterization of urgency and the risk associated with surgical procedures, calculation of preoperative risk assessment, indications for diagnostic testing to quantify cardiac risk, and perioperative strategies to minimize the risk of cardiac complications.

The Preoperative Evaluation of the Patient With Cardiac Risk Factors for Noncardiac Surgery: Which Patients Need Further Cardiac Risk Stratification Tests?

Cardiac risk stratification tests should be pursued only in the subgroup of patients who have a moderate to high incidence of significant coronary artery disease and only in those who will gain long-term benefit from coronary revascularization if they are found to have significant coronary artery disease. Furthermore, car diac risk stratification tests should be pursued only if the perioperative mortality and morbidity from com bined coronary revascularization followed by noncar diac surgery is not significantly higher than proceeding straight to noncardiac surgery alone. Indentification of the subgroup of patients who will need cardiac strati fication tests should be based on integration of the patient's cardiac risk factors and functional capacity with the risk and stress of the particular surgery.

Differences in coronary artery blood velocities in the setting of normal coronary angiography and normal stress echocardiography

Background

Normal left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery as determined by coronary angiography is considered not only to reflect normal angiography but also to correlate with normal anatomy and function. However, subjects who undergo coronary angiography may differ from those who do not need to have invasive evaluation even if their functional noninvasive studies like dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) were normal.

Aim

LAD velocities in subjects with normal angiography and those with normal DSE are equal.

Methods

A total of 244 subjects were evaluated, 78 had normal LAD by angiography and 166 had normal LAD by DSE. All had Doppler sampling of LAD velocities by transthoracic echocardiography.

Results

Velocity was higher in the angiographic subgroup in diastole 41 ± 23 vs 33 ± 14 cm/s, p = 0.0078; systole 18 ± 14 vs 13 ± 7 cm/s, p = 0.012; diastolic integral 12.6 ± 5 vs 9.8 ± 3.8 cm, p = 3.15 × 10^-5; systolic velocity integral 4 ± 2.9 vs 2.8 ± 1.9, p = 0.0014. While heart rate was similar in both groups, the product of diastolic velocity integral and heart rate of the LAD in the angiographic group was higher: 902 ± 450 vs 656 ± 394, p = 0.00599. Diastolic velocity deceleration time was similar in both groups. Coronary flow reserve defined as diastolic velocity ratio before and immediately after DSE correlated negatively with baseline velocity, r = -0.4.

Conclusions

Mode of defining normality of coronary artery affects velocity behavior of the vessel, reflecting functional differences possibly related to microvasculature and vasodilatation.

Screening for cardiovascular disease before kidney transplantation

Pre-kidney transplant cardiac screening has garnered particular attention from guideline committees as an approach to improving post-transplant success. Screening serves two major purposes: To more accurately inform transplant candidates of their risk for a cardiac event before and after the transplant, thereby informing decisions about proceeding with transplantation, and to guide pre-transplant management so that post-transplant success can be maximized. Transplant candidates on dialysis are more likely to be screened for coronary artery disease than those not being considered for transplantation. Thorough history and physical examination taking, resting electrocardiography and echocardiography, exercise stress testing, myocardial perfusion scintigraphy, dobutamine stress echocardiography, cardiac computed tomography, cardiac biomarker measurement, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging all play contributory roles towards screening for cardiovascular disease before kidney transplantation. In this review, the importance of each of these screening procedures for both coronary artery disease and other forms of cardiac disease are discussed.

Cardiac risk assessment before non-cardiac surgery

Cardiovascular events account for half of the deaths related to non-cardiac surgery. Identification of a patient's risk and perioperative management appropriate to that risk is important to optimize the clinical outcome of surgery. Key concepts of preoperative cardiac risk assessment are contained within American and European guidelines. Risk indices stratify patients according to clinical and surgery-specific predictors. The most widely used is the Lee index; however, all have limitations. Patients at intermediate and high risk following risk index stratification and assessment of functional capacity require further non-invasive assessment to detect myocardial ischaemia using, for instance, exercise electrocardiography, myocardial perfusion scintigraphy, or stress echocardiography. It can be difficult, however, to decide which technique and predictor is most effective and local practice differs. Invasive coronary angiography is not recommended unless it would be performed in the absence of surgery. Appropriate pain management should be considered in all patients and beta-blockade may improve the outcome in intermediate- and high-risk patients. Identifying patients with risk factors or previously undiagnosed coronary artery disease enables the preoperative cardiac risk assessment to guide long-term treatment.

Plasma N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide is predictive of perioperative cardiac events in patients undergoing vascular surgery

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Identification of patients at high risk for perioperative cardiac events (POCE) is clinically important. This study aimed to determine whether preoperative measurement of plasma N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) could predict POCE, and compared its predictive value with that of conventional cardiac risk factors and stress thallium scans in patients undergoing vascular surgery.

METHODS

Patients scheduled for non-cardiac vascular surgery were prospectively enrolled. Clinical risk factors were identified, and NT-proBNP levels and stress thallium scans were obtained. POCE was the composite of acute myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure including acute pulmonary edema, and primary cardiac death within 5 days after surgery. A modified Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) was proposed and compared with NT-proBNP; a positive result for ischemia and a significant perfusion defect (≥ 3 walls, moderate to severely decreased, reversible perfusion defect) on the thallium scan were added to the RCRI.

RESULTS

A total of 365 patients (91% males) with a mean age of 67 years had a median NT-proBNP level of 105.1 pg/mL (range of quartile, 50.9 to 301.9). POCE occurred in 49 (13.4%) patients. After adjustment for confounders, an NT-proBNP level of > 302 pg/mL (odds ratio [OR], 5.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.1 to 10.3; p < 0.001) and a high risk by the modified RCRI (OR, 3.9; 95% CI, 1.6 to 9.3; p = 0.002) were independent predictors for POCE. Comparison of the area under the curves for predicting POCE showed no statistical differences between NT-proBNP and RCRI.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative measurement of NT-proBNP provides information useful for prediction of POCE as a single parameter in high-risk patients undergoing noncardiac vascular surgery.

The coronary CT angiography vision protocol: a prospective observational imaging cohort study in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery

INTRODUCTION

At present, physicians have a limited ability to predict major cardiovascular complications after non-cardiac surgery and little is known about the anatomy of coronary arteries associated with perioperative myocardial infarction. We have initiated the Coronary CT Angiography (CTA) VISION Study to (1) establish the predictive value of coronary CTA for perioperative myocardial infarction and death and (2) describe the coronary anatomy of patients that have a perioperative myocardial infarction.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The Coronary CTA VISION Study is prospective observational study. Preoperative coronary CTA will be performed in 1000-1500 patients with a history of vascular disease or at least three cardiovascular risk factors who are undergoing major elective non-cardiac surgery. Serial troponin will be measured 6-12 h after surgery and daily for the first 3 days after surgery. Major vascular outcomes at 30 days and 1 year after surgery will be independently adjudicated.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Coronary CTA results in a measurable radiation exposure that is similar to a nuclear perfusion scan (10-12 mSV). Treating physicians will be blinded to the CTA results until 30 days after surgery in order to provide the most unbiased assessment of its prognostic capabilities. The only exception will be the presence of a left main stenosis >50%. This approach is supported by best available current evidence that, excluding left main disease, prophylatic revascularisation prior to non-cardiac surgery does not improve outcomes. An external safety and monitoring committee is overseeing the study and will review outcome data at regular intervals. Publications describing the results of the study will be submitted to major peer-reviewed journals and presented at international medical conferences.

Imaging techniques in coronary atherosclerotic disease: dobutamine stress echocardiography--evidence and perspectives

Dobutamine stress echocardiography is the most widely disseminated noninvasive technique for the assessment of coronary artery disease. Its results are important for clinical decisions. It is a versatile technique with high sensitivity and specificity for detecting viable myocardium at jeopardy. More recently, strain rate imaging has been applied to stress echocardiography. This approach relies on tissue Doppler or two-dimensional strain imaging to quantify myocardial deformation. The application of contrast echocardiographic techniques to stress echocardiography enables left ventricular opacification for border enhancement and myocardial perfusion imaging. Thus, this application is not limited to stress echocardiography, but has utility whenever image quality adversely affects wall motion assessment. Recently, three-dimensional stress echocardiography imaging has been proposed as an alternative approach to assess myocardial ischemia.

Coronary risk assessment and management options in chronic kidney disease patients prior to kidney transplantation

Cardiovascular disease remains the most important cause of morbidity and mortality among kidney transplant recipients. Nearly half the deaths in transplanted patients are attributed to cardiac causes and almost 5% of these deaths occur within the first year after transplantation. The ideal strategies to screen for coronary artery disease (CAD) in chronic kidney disease patients who are evaluated for kidney transplantation (KT) remain controversial. The American Society of Transplantation recommends that patients with diabetes, prior history of ischemic heart disease or an abnormal ECG, or age ≥50 years should be considered as high-risk for CAD and referred for a cardiac stress test and only those with a positive stress test, for coronary angiography. Despite these recommendations, vast variations exist in the way these patients are screened for CAD at different transplant centers. The sensitivity and specificity of noninvasive cardiac tests in CKD patients is much lower than that in the general population. This has prompted the use of direct diagnostic cardiac catheterization in high-risk patients in several transplant centers despite the risks associated with this invasive procedure. No large randomized controlled trials exist to date that address these issues. In this article, we review the existing literature with regards to the available data on cardiovascular risk screening and management options in CKD patients presenting for kidney transplantation and outline a strategy for approach to these patients.

Association of echocardiography before major elective non-cardiac surgery with postoperative survival and length of hospital stay: population based cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the association of resting echocardiography before elective intermediate to high risk non-cardiac surgery with survival and length of hospital stay.

DESIGN

Population based retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Acute care hospitals in Ontario, Canada, between 1 April 1999 and 31 March 2008.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients aged over 40 years who had elective intermediate to high risk non-cardiac surgery.

INTERVENTION

Resting echocardiography within 6 months before surgery.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Postoperative survival (30 days and 1 year) and length of hospital stay; postoperative surgical site infection as an outcome for which no association with echocardiography would be expected.

RESULTS

Of the 264,823 patients in the entire cohort, 15.1% (n = 40,084) had echocardiography. After use of propensity score methods to assemble a matched cohort (n = 70,996) that reduced differences between patients who had or had not had echocardiography, echocardiography was associated with increases in 30 day mortality (relative risk 1.14, 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 1.27), 1 year mortality (1.07, 1.01 to 1.12), and length of hospital stay but no difference in surgical site infections (1.03, 0.98 to 1.06). The association with mortality was influenced (P = 0.02) by whether patients had had stress testing or had risk factors for cardiac complications. No association existed between echocardiography and mortality among patients who had stress testing (relative risk 1.01, 0.92 to 1.11) or among patients at high risk who had not had stress testing (1.00, 0.87 to 1.13). However, echocardiography was associated with mortality in patients at low risk (relative risk 1.44, 1.14 to 1.82) and intermediate risk (1.10, 1.02 to 1.18) who had not had stress testing.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative echocardiography was not associated with improved survival or shorter hospital stay after major non-cardiac surgery. These findings highlight the need for further research to guide better use of this common preoperative test.

Preoperative cardiac risk management

Approximately 100 million people undergo noncardiac surgery annually worldwide. It is estimated that around 3% of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery experience a major adverse cardiac event. Although cardiac events, like myocardial infarction, are major cause of perioperative morbidity or mortality, its true incidence is difficult to assess. The risk of perioperative cardiac complications depends mainly on two conditions: (1) identified risk factors, and (2) the type of the surgical procedure. On that basis, different scoring systems have been developed in order to accurately assess the perioperative cardiac risk and to improve the patient management. Importantly, patients with estimated high risk should be tested preoperatively by non-invasive cardiac imaging modalities. According to test results, they can proceed directly to planed surgery with the use of cardioprotective drugs (beta-blockers, statins, aspirin), or to myocardial revascularization prior to non-cardiac surgery. In this review, we discuss the role of clinical cardiac risk factors, laboratory measurements, additional non-invasive cardiac testing, and consequent strategies in perioperative management of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery.

Optimizing the management of elderly colorectal surgery patients

With the ever increasing number of geriatric surgical patients, there is a need to develop efficient processes that address all of the potential issues faced by patients during the perioperative period. This article explores the physiological changes in elderly surgical patients and the outcomes achieved after major abdominal surgery. Perioperative management strategies for elderly surgical patients in line with the practices of the Geriatric Surgical Team of Alexandra Health, Singapore, are also presented. A coordinated transdisciplinary approach best tackles the complexities encountered in these patients.

[Non-cardiac surgery in patients with cardiac disease]

BACKGROUND

Patients with cardiac disease have a higher incidence of cardiovascular events after non-cardiac surgery than those without such disease. This paper provides an overview of perioperative examinations and treatment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Own experience and systematic literature search through work with European guidelines constitute the basis for recommendations given in this article.

RESULTS

Beta-blockers should not be discontinued before surgery. High-risk patients may benefit from beta-blockers administered before major non-cardiac surgery. Slow dose titration is recommended. Echocardiography should be performed before preoperative beta-blockade to exclude latent heart failure. Statins should be considered before elective surgery and coronary intervention (stenting or surgery) before high-risk surgery. Otherwise, interventions should be evaluated irrespective of planned non-cardiac surgery. Patients with unstable coronary syndrome should only undergo non-cardiac surgery on vital indications. Neuraxial techniques are optimal for postoperative pain relief and thus for postoperative mobilization. Thromboprophylaxis is important, but increases the risk of epidural haematoma and requires systematic follow-up with respect to diagnostics and treatment.

INTERPRETATION

Little evidence supports the use of different anaesthetic methods in cardiac patients that undergo non-cardiac surgery than in other patients. Stable circulation, sufficient oxygenation, good pain relief, thromboprophylaxis, enteral nutrition and early mobilization are important factors for improving the perioperative course. Close cooperation between anaesthesiologist, surgeon and cardiologist improves logistics and treatment.

Cardiovascular risk assessment of the diabetic patient undergoing major noncardiac surgery

Noncardiac surgery is associated with an increased risk for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. It is important to stratify the risk of these patients for perioperative cardiac events. Diabetes, a presently rapidly expanding disease, is a major risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Importantly, silent ischemia is more common in diabetic patients than in the general population. When preoperative risk assessment identifies an increased risk, further cardiac testing is warranted. The most commonly used stress tests for detecting cardiac ischemia is treadmill or bicycle ergometry. However, patients undergoing noncardiac surgery frequently have limited exercise capacity due to co-morbidities. Pharmacologic testing, such as dobutamine stress echocardiography and dipyridamole myocardial perfusion scintigraphy can be performed in patients with limited exercise capacity. Non-invasive stress testing should be considered, especially in diabetic patients, to detect asymptomatic coronary artery disease. Furthermore, when an increased cardiac risk is assessed, two strategies could be used to reduce the incidence of perioperative cardiac events: 1) prophylactic coronary revascularization from which the value is still controversial, and 2) pharmacological treatment (with beta-blockers, statins and aspirin), associated with improved post-operative outcome.

Long-term outcome of prophylactic coronary revascularization in cardiac high-risk patients undergoing major vascular surgery (from the randomized DECREASE-V Pilot Study)

Prophylactic coronary revascularization in vascular surgery patients with extensive coronary artery disease was not associated with an improved immediate postoperative outcome. However, the potential long-term benefit was unknown. This study was performed to assess the long-term benefit of prophylactic coronary revascularization in these patients. Of 1,880 patients scheduled for major vascular surgery, 430 had > or =3 risk factors (age >70 years, angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, heart failure, stroke, diabetes mellitus, and renal failure). All underwent cardiac testing using dobutamine echocardiography or nuclear stress imaging. Patients with extensive stress-induced ischemia (> or =5 segments or > or =3 walls) were randomly assigned to additional revascularization. In total, 101 patients showed extensive ischemia and were assigned to revascularization (n = 49) or no revascularization (n = 52). After 2.8 years, the overall survival rate was 64% for patients randomly assigned to no preoperative coronary revascularization versus 61% for patients assigned to preoperative coronary revascularization (hazard ratio [HR] 1.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63 to 2.19, p = 0.61). Rates for survival free of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and coronary revascularization were similar in both groups at 49% and 42% for patients allocated to medical treatment or coronary revascularization, respectively (HR 1.51, 95% CI 0.89 to 2.57, p = 0.13). Only 2 patients assigned to medical treatment required coronary revascularization during follow-up. Also, in patients who survived the first 30 days after surgery, there was no apparent benefit of revascularization on cardiac events (HR 1.35, 95% CI 0.72 to 2.52, p = 0.36). In conclusion, preoperative coronary revascularization in high-risk patients undergoing major vascular surgery was not associated with improved postoperative or long-term outcome compared with the best medical treatment.

Use of a nurse-led intervention to optimize beta-blockade for reducing cardiac events after major noncardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

Although guidelines recommend the use of beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs to reduce cardiac events (CEs) after major noncardiac surgery, trial results have varied between showing benefit, ineffectiveness, and harm. We sought whether optimizing beta-blockade (BB) delivery could make them more effective.

METHODS

Intermediate risk patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery (n = 400) were randomized to 2 strategies of BB therapy: universal BB (UBB; n = 197) comprising an algorithm-based, nurse-led strategy to optimize dosing and adherence to bisoprolol titration over > or =1 week preoperatively versus usual care (UC; n = 203), whereby BB are continued in those already taking them or prescribed for patients identified as high risk based on ischemia (new or inducible wall motion abnormalities) at dobutamine echocardiography (DbE). Daily electrocardiogram and troponin levels were obtained on 3 postoperative days. The primary end point was a major CE (cardiac death or myocardial infarction) within 30 days.

RESULTS

There were 25 major CEs (6.3%), occurring in 13 (6.6%) of 197 UBB and 12 (5.9%) of 203 UC patients (OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.52-2.39). Independent predictors of CEs were baseline systolic blood pressure (beta 1.02, P = .005) and postoperative hypotension (beta 1.02, P = .03) but not treatment strategy. Those randomized to UBB had significantly better heart rate control perioperatively, at the cost of bradycardia and hypotension. The negative predictive value of DbE in this study was 95%.

CONCLUSIONS

These data confirm a persistent CE rate after major noncardiac surgery despite nurse-led dose titration of bisoprolol. Cardiac events were equivalent to a UC strategy based on DbE results.

Recent advances in dobutamine stress echocardiography

Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) is a reliable cardiac risk stratifier that has widespread applicability because of its clinical accuracy and cost effectiveness. Dobutamine has positive inotropic and chronotropic effects and is commonly used in patients who cannot exercise or achieve an adequate heart rate response with exercise. Recently available long-term results from several independent clinical trials, combined with enhancements in image quality, have improved the ability to detect significant coronary artery disease and determine myocardial viability. Dobutamine stress echocardiography has an excellent safety profile with clinical results superior to regular exercise electrocardiography and comparable with exercise echocardiography and radionucleotide perfusion stress imaging. Low-dose dobutamine response can accurately predict dysfunctional yet viable myocardial regions that may improve with revascularization. Clinical studies are now available refining the common use of DSE preoperatively in female patients with valvular disease, as well as in the emergency department. Dobutamine stress echocardiography does have some limitations in discriminating particular regions of ischemia when multiple ventricular segments are involved and when the imaging is suboptimal. It can be applied using minimal additional resources in an otherwise functioning echocardiography laboratory and, with appropriate training, can result in clinical results comparable with those of large-scale multicenter trials. Ongoing improvements in technology and the development of new reagents such as myocardial contrast agents hold promise for further advancement in the near future.

Clinical relevance of chest pain during dobutamine stress echocardiography in women

BACKGROUND

Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) is commonly used for diagnosis and management of patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Chest pain occurring during DSE potentially provides additional diagnostic accuracy. Our experience suggests that chest pain occurs frequently in women undergoing DSE.

HYPOTHESIS

It was the purpose of this study to determine the frequency with which chest pain occurs in women undergoing DSE and the relation to inducible ischemia or coronary artery stenosis.

METHODS

To determine the prevalence and clinical significance or chest pain during DSE, we reviewed the records of 154 consecutive women undergoing DSE in our laboratory. Of these, 59 patients (37.5%) also underwent coronary angiography. The presence or absence of chest pain was correlated with ECG changes, left ventricular wall motion abnormalities during DSE, and coronary stenosis by angiography.

RESULTS

Forty-one women (26%) developed chest pain during DSE. Patients experiencing chest pain were older (58.5 +/- 9.3 vs. 54.9 +/- 12.6; p = 0.05), and had lower resting heart rates (71 +/- 12.2 vs. 77.9 +/- 14.9; p = 0.008), but received similar maximum doses of dobutamine and reached comparable peak heart rates (131.1 +/- 17.4 vs. 133.5 +/- 21.7; p = NS). Patients with chest pain more commonly exhibited ST-segment depression > or = 1 mm during dobutamine infusion (13/41, 32%, vs. 17/113, 15%; p = 0.02), but chest pain showed no statistically significant correlation with abnormal DSE or with coronary stenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

In women undergoing DSE, chest pain occurs in 26% and does not appear to be related to inducible myocardial ischemia. Electrocardiographic changes occur more frequently in patients who experience chest pain, but are also often unrelated to inducible myocardial ischemia.

Prognostic value of left atrial volume in patients who underwent dobutamine stress echocardiography for known or suspected coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

Left atrial volume indexed (LAVI) has been reported as a predictor of cardiovascular events. We sought to determine the prognostic value of LAVI for predicting the outcome of patients who underwent dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) for known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS

From January 2000 to July 2005, we studied 981 patients who underwent DSE and off-line measurements of LAVI. The value of DSE over clinical and LAVI data was examined using a stepwise log-rank test.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 24 months, 56 (6%) events occurred. By univariate analysis, predictors of events were male sex, diabetes mellitus, previous myocardial infarction, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left atrial diameter indexed, LAVI, and abnormal DSE. By multivariate analysis, independent predictors were LVEF (relative risk [RR] = 0.98, 95% CI 0.95-1.00), LAVI (RR = 1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.05), and abnormal DSE (RR = 2.70, 95% CI 1.28-5.69). In an incremental multivariate model, LAVI was additional to clinical data for predicting events (chi(2) 36.8, P < .001). The addition of DSE to clinical and LAVI yielded incremental information (chi(2) 55.3, P < .001). The 3-year event-free survival in patients with normal DSE and LAVI < or =33 mL/m(2) was 96%; with abnormal DSE and LAVI < or =33 mL/m(2), 91%; with normal DSE and LAVI >34 mL/m(2), 83%; and with abnormal DSE and LAVI >34 mL/m(2), 51%.

CONCLUSION

Left atrial volume indexed provides independent prognostic information in patients who underwent DSE for known or suspected CAD. Among patients with normal DSE, those with larger LAVI had worse outcome, and among patients with abnormal DSE, LAVI was still predictive.

Prognostic value of dobutamine stress echocardiography with early injection of atropine with versus without chronic beta-blocker therapy in patients with known or suspected coronary heart disease

Although a new protocol of dobutamine stress echocardiography with the early injection of atropine (EA-DSE) has been demonstrated to be useful in reducing adverse effects and increasing the number of effective tests and to have similar accuracy for detecting coronary artery disease (CAD) compared with conventional protocols, no data exist regarding its ability to predict long-term events. The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic value of EA-DSE and the effects of the long-term use of beta blockers on it. A retrospective evaluation of 844 patients who underwent EA-DSE for known or suspected CAD was performed; 309 (37%) were receiving beta blockers. During a median follow-up period of 24 months, 102 events (12%) occurred. On univariate analysis, predictors of events were the ejection fraction (p <0.001), male gender (p <0.001), previous myocardial infarction (p <0.001), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy (p = 0.021), calcium channel blocker therapy (p = 0.034), and abnormal results on EA-DSE (p <0.001). On multivariate analysis, the independent predictors of events were male gender (relative risk [RR] 1.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13 to 2.81, p = 0.013) and abnormal results on EA-DSE (RR 4.45, 95% CI 2.84 to 7.01, p <0.0001). Normal results on EA-DSE with beta blockers were associated with a nonsignificant higher incidence of events than normal results on EA-DSE without beta blockers (RR 1.29, 95% CI 0.58 to 2.87, p = 0.54). Abnormal results on EA-DSE with beta blockers had an RR of 4.97 (95% CI 2.79 to 8.87, p <0.001) compared with normal results, while abnormal results on EA-DSE without beta blockers had an RR of 5.96 (95% CI 3.41 to 10.44, p <0.001) for events, with no difference between groups (p = 0.36). In conclusion, the detection of fixed or inducible wall motion abnormalities during EA-DSE was an independent predictor of long-term events in patients with known or suspected CAD. The prognostic value of EA-DSE was not affected by the long-term use of beta blockers.

Stress echocardiography for risk stratification in patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

The predictive accuracy of stress echocardiography (SE) for adverse cardiac events has been variable in the population with end-stage renal disease undergoing renal transplantation (RT).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of 149 patients who had pretransplant SE before RT between 1997 and 2003. Patients were followed up for a mean of 2.85 years for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).

RESULTS

Of 149 patients studied, 139 had a negative SE, 65% were African American; 12 underwent cardiac catheterization. Only 1 patient required pre-RT revascularization. Sixteen MACE occurred over the follow-up period. SE had 37.5% sensitivity, 95.3% specificity, 33.3% positive predictive value, and 96.1% negative predictive value for MACE in the first year post-RT. First-year posttransplant event rates were 4.0% versus 30% (P < .001) for patients with a negative SE and positive SE, respectively. Multivariate predictors of MACE were positive SE (hazard ratio [HR] 7.64), hemoglobin less than 11 g/dL post-RT (HR 4.44), and calcium channel blocker use posttransplant (HR 2.90).

CONCLUSIONS

A negative SE has low incidence of MACE in this intermediate- to high-risk patient subset. A positive SE predicts a sevenfold higher risk of cardiovascular events regardless of the need for revascularization before the transplant.

Value of myocardial viability estimation using dobutamine stress echocardiography in assessing risk preoperatively before noncardiac vascular surgery in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction <35%

Patients with heart failure (HF) scheduled for vascular surgery have an increased risk of adverse postoperative outcome, and stratification usually depends on dichotomous risk factors. A quantitative prognostic model for patients with HF was developed using wall motion patterns during dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE). A total of 295 consecutive patients (mean age 67 +/- 12 years) with ejection fraction < or =35% were studied. During DSE, wall motion patterns of dysfunctional segments were scored as scar, ischemia, or sustained improvement. Cardiac death and myocardial infarction were noted perioperatively and during 5 years of follow-up. Of 4,572 dysfunctional segments; 1,783 (39%) had ischemia, 1,280 (28%) had sustained improvement, and 1,509 (33%) had scar. In 212 patients, > or =1 ischemic segment was present; 83 had only sustained improvement. Perioperative and late cardiac event rates were 20% and 30%, respectively. Using multivariate analysis, number of ischemic segments was associated with perioperative cardiac events (odds ratio per segment 1.6, 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 1.8), whereas number of segments with sustained improvement was associated with improved outcome (odds ratio per segment 0.2, 95% confidence interval 0.04 to 0.7). Multivariate independent predictors of late cardiac events were age and ischemia. Sustained improvement was associated with improved survival. In conclusion, DSE provides accurate risk stratification of patients with HF undergoing vascular surgery.

A clinical randomized trial to evaluate the safety of a noninvasive approach in high-risk patients undergoing major vascular surgery: the DECREASE-V Pilot Study

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this research was to perform a feasibility study of prophylactic coronary revascularization in patients with preoperative extensive stress-induced ischemia.

BACKGROUND

Prophylactic coronary revascularization in vascular surgery patients with coronary artery disease does not improve postoperative outcome. If a beneficial effect is to be expected, then at least those with extensive coronary artery disease should benefit from this strategy.

METHODS

One thousand eight hundred eighty patients were screened, and those with > or =3 risk factors underwent cardiac testing using dobutamine echocardiography (17-segment model) or stress nuclear imaging (6-wall model). Those with extensive stress-induced ischemia (> or =5 segments or > or =3 walls) were randomly assigned for additional revascularization. All received beta-blockers aiming at a heart rate of 60 to 65 beats/min, and antiplatelet therapy was continued during surgery. The end points were the composite of all-cause death or myocardial infarction at 30 days and during 1-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Of 430 high-risk patients, 101 (23%) showed extensive ischemia and were randomly assigned to revascularization (n = 49) or no revascularization. Coronary angiography showed 2-vessel disease in 12 (24%), 3-vessel disease in 33 (67%), and left main in 4 (8%). Two patients died after revascularization, but before operation, because of a ruptured aneurysm. Revascularization did not improve 30-day outcome; the incidence of the composite end point was 43% versus 33% (odds ratio 1.4, 95% confidence interval 0.7 to 2.8; p = 0.30). Also, no benefit during 1-year follow-up was observed after coronary revascularization (49% vs. 44%, odds ratio 1.2, 95% confidence interval 0.7 to 2.3; p = 0.48).

CONCLUSIONS

In this randomized pilot study, designed to obtain efficacy and safety estimates, preoperative coronary revascularization in high-risk patients was not associated with an improved outcome.