Ciprofloxacin interaction with sodium warfarin: a potentially dangerous side effect

Structured override reasons for drug-drug interaction alerts in electronic health records

Objective

The study sought to determine availability and use of structured override reasons for drug-drug interaction (DDI) alerts in electronic health records.

Materials and Methods

We collected data on DDI alerts and override reasons from 10 clinical sites across the United States using a variety of electronic health records. We used a multistage iterative card sort method to categorize the override reasons from all sites and identified best practices.

Results

Our methodology established 177 unique override reasons across the 10 sites. The number of coded override reasons at each site ranged from 3 to 100. Many sites offered override reasons not relevant to DDIs. Twelve categories of override reasons were identified. Three categories accounted for 78% of all overrides: “will monitor or take precautions,” “not clinically significant,” and “benefit outweighs risk.”

Discussion

We found wide variability in override reasons between sites and many opportunities to improve alerts. Some override reasons were irrelevant to DDIs. Many override reasons attested to a future action (eg, decreasing a dose or ordering monitoring tests), which requires an additional step after the alert is overridden, unless the alert is made actionable. Some override reasons deferred to another party, although override reasons often are not visible to other users. Many override reasons stated that the alert was inaccurate, suggesting that specificity of alerts could be improved.

Conclusions

Organizations should improve the options available to providers who choose to override DDI alerts. DDI alerting systems should be actionable and alerts should be tailored to the patient and drug pairs.

Levofloxacin and Warfarin Interaction

OBJECTIVE:

To report 4 cases of hypoprothrombotic response resulting from addition of levofloxacin therapy to chronic warfarin therapy and to review related literature to support or refute a warfarin—levofloxacin interaction.

CASE SUMMARY:

Four patients, 34–81 years old, were prescribed levofloxacin concomitantly with stable warfarin therapy. Three patients had a target international normalized ratio (INR) range of 2.0–3.0 and experienced an increase in INR to 3.5, 8.12, and 11.5 on days 11, 5, and 4 of a 10-day course of levofloxacin, respectively. The fourth patient experienced minor bleeding, with a slightly elevated INR on the second day of levofloxacin therapy that required up to a 19% warfarin dose reduction during levofloxacin treatment.

DISCUSSION:

An initial premarketing clinical trial concluded that levofloxacin had no effect on warfarin's pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic response. Two case reports have since documented an increase in INR in patients taking long-term warfarin on completion of levofloxacin therapy. Our case reports provide further evidence of a significant increase in INR observed during concomitant levofloxacin therapy. The proposed mechanism of this interaction is displacement of warfarin from protein binding sites, reduction in gut flora producing vitamin K, and decreased warfarin metabolism.

CONCLUSIONS:

Prolonged prothrombin response in patients undergoing chronic warfarin therapy has been well documented with many antibiotics, including fluoroquinolones. Recognition of newer antibiotics' effects on warfarin therapy is important to guide safe use and monitoring of anticoagulation therapy. Our case studies demonstrate significant elevations in INR values during and up to 1 day after levofloxacin therapy in patients undergoing stable warfarin therapy.

Reduced Blood Coagulation on Roll-to-Roll, Shrink-Induced Superhydrophobic Plastics

The unique antiwetting properties of superhydrophobic (SH) surfaces prevent the adhesion of water and bodily fluids, including blood, urine, and saliva. While typical manufacturable approaches to create SH surfaces rely on chemical and structural modifications, such approaches are expensive, require postprocessing, and are often not biocompatible. By contrast, it is demonstrated that purely structural SH features are easily formed using high throughput roll-to-roll (R2R) manufacturing by shrinking a prestressed thermoplastic with a thin, stiff layer of silver and calcium. These features are subsequently embossed into any commercially available and Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved plastic. The R2R SH surfaces have contact angles >150° and contact angle hysteresis <10°. Importantly, the surfaces minimize blood adhesion, leading to reduced blood coagulation without the need for anticoagulants. SH surfaces have >4200× reduction of blood residue area compared to the nonstructured controls of the same material. In addition, blood clotting is reduced >5× using whole blood directly from the patient. Furthermore, these surfaces can be easily configured into 3D shapes, as demonstrated with SH tubes. With the simple scale-up production and the eliminated need for anticoagulants to prevent clotting, the proposed conformable SH surfaces can be impactful for a wide range of medical tools, including catheters and microfluidic channels.

Interactions Between Warfarin and Three Commonly Prescribed Fluoroquinolones

Objective:

To critically evaluate a possible increased anticoagulant response during concomitant warfarin and fluoroquinolone therapy.

Data Sources:

A literature search was conducted using PubMed, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, and MEDLINE, from inception to January 2008, combining the term warfarin individually with ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin. These 3 quinolones were selected based on their commercial availability and use in the US.

Study Selection and Data Extraction:

All publication types including human participants and published in English were eligible for review. Reports were selected based on the use of typical treatment courses of fluoroquinolones during concomitant warfarin therapy and the reporting of prothrombin time (PT) or international normalized ratio (INR).

Data Synthesis:

Twenty-two publications were evaluated including 16 case reports or case series, 2 retrospective cohort studies, and 4 prospective studies, which included 2 placebo-controlled investigations, identified reports covered a wide range of patient ages with multiple comorbidities. Changes in PT and INR values were considerably variable and inconsistent during concomitant warfarin and fluoroquinolone therapy. Results from the 6 structured reports demonstrated mean increases in PT and INR values that were clinically insignificant. However, some patients experienced significant increases above the desired therapeutic range. Increased anticoagulation was typically observed within the first week of concomitant fluoroquinolone therapy. Bleeding complications during times of increased anticoagulation were not always observed, but did result in death for 2 patients.

Conclusions:

Published data show no consistent increase in anticoagulant effects during concomitant warfarin and 3 commonly prescribed fluoroquinolones. Therefore, more frequent monitoring during concomitant therapy would be prudent.

Ciprofloxacin prolonged-release tablets do not affect warfarin pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the pharmacokinetics of warfarin and ciprofloxacin PR (a prolonged-release formulation of ciprofloxacin) were altered after coadministration. Eighteen healthy male volunteers were given a single oral 7.5-mg dose of warfarin, a single oral 500-mg dose of ciprofloxacin PR, or both drugs administered together in a randomized, open-label, 3-way crossover study. Ciprofloxacin concentrations, warfarin (R)- and (S)-enantiomer concentrations, prothrombin time, and activated partial thromboplastin time were measured over 120 hours following study drug administration. There were no significant differences in pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic parameters among treatments. A slightly greater value of half-life for (R)-warfarin was observed when coadministered with ciprofloxacin PR compared with warfarin administered alone (52.6 vs 50.1 hours, P = .029). This difference is not considered clinically relevant, because the values remain similar. These results show that warfarin pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics are not altered with concomitant administration of ciprofloxacin PR.

Anticoagulation-Related Outcomes in Patients Receiving Warfarin After Starting Levofloxacin or Gatifloxacin

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare anticoagulation-related outcomes in patients receiving stable dosages of warfarin who started levofloxacin or gatifloxacin therapy.

DESIGN

Retrospective medical record review.

SETTING

Veterans Affairs medical center.

PATIENTS

Of 92 patients receiving the same dosages of warfarin for at least 4 weeks before starting antibiotic therapy, 54 received levofloxacin between January and September 2003, and 38 received gatifloxacin between January and September 2004.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Data were obtained through the hospital's pharmacy, laboratory, and general patient databases and through electronic medical records. The INRs evaluated were prefluoroquinolone use, defined as the last INR measured before the start of antibiotic therapy (up to 4 wks earlier), and postfluoroquinolone use, defined as any INR measured during antibiotic therapy through 1 week after discontinuation of the antibiotic. Analyzed outcomes included the percentage of patients with postfluoroquinolone INRs that were above 4, that exceeded the therapeutic goal, or that exceeded the goal by more than 1 point; INR changes of more than 0.5, 1, or 1.5 points above the INR before fluoroquinolone use; major or minor bleeding events; requirement for vitamin K administration; warfarin dosage reduction or withholding doses; and warfarin-related hospital, emergency, or urgent care admissions or visits. No significant differences were noted in baseline characteristics with regard to age, sex, prefluoroquinolone INR, or anticoagulation indications between the two groups. The percentage of patients with a postfluoroquinolone INR above 4 was 2% (1 of 54 patients) in the levofloxacin group versus 21% (8 of 38 patients) in the gatifloxacin group (p=0.003). The percentage of patients receiving vitamin K in the levofloxacin and gatifloxacin groups was 0% (0 of 54 patients) and 11% (4 of 38, p=0.026), respectively. For the other anticoagulation-related outcomes, no significant differences were noted between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Patients receiving warfarin who take gatifloxacin may be at higher risk for an INR above 4 compared with those taking levofloxacin. Close monitoring of warfarin therapy while concomitantly receiving gatifloxacin is warranted.

Moxifloxacin and warfarin: additional evidence for a clinically relevant interaction

Several case reports have been published regarding an interaction between fluoroquinolones and warfarin; however, the exact mechanism of the interaction has yet to be established. We describe three patients who were receiving warfarin and experienced increases in international normalized ratio (INR) when moxifloxacin was added. Two of the patients had stable anticoagulation regimens and then experienced persistent elevations in their INRs shortly after therapy with moxifloxacin was started. The third patient experienced a dramatic rise in INR after the first dose of moxifloxacin was administered. These cases strengthen the evidence that an interaction does exist despite manufacturer-generated statements to the contrary. Increased awareness of this potential interaction is necessary to ensure appropriate monitoring and improve therapeutic decision making.

Resistance to oral vitamin K for reversal of overanticoagulation during Crohn's disease relapse

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this case report is to describe oral vitamin K resistance in a patient with concomitant Crohn's disease (CD) relapse and supratherapeutic anticoagulation. Additionally, a literature review was conducted to explore the mechanism and supporting evidence for poor response to oral vitamin K during CD relapse.

CASE REPORT

A 36 year-old female presented with an elevated International Normalized Ratio (INR) of 7.8 during a relapse of CD including symptoms of severe, persistent diarrhea and reduced appetite. For excessive anticoagulation, initial management consisted of withholding warfarin for seven days, administering vitamin K in a total dose of 10 mg orally and 1 mg intravenously. One week later, the INR remained elevated at 8.09. Subcutaneous vitamin K, in a dose of 5 mg, was administered on day eight, and the INR was reduced to a subtherapeutic result of 1.2 on day eleven.

DISCUSSION

The case report illustrates a poor response to recommended and repeated doses of oral vitamin K and a single, small dose of intravenous vitamin K during CD relapse. However, the patient responded favorably to vitamin K by the subcutaneous route. Current literature and consensus guidelines recommend the oral route of vitamin K as first-line management of overanticoagulation due to warfarin. Present data supports that patients with inflammatory bowel disease including CD have a greater incidence of vitamin K deficiency and malabsorption, and this is likely due to multiple pathological mechanisms.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this case report, treatment of overanticoagulation in patients with CD relapse should include aggressive management, close monitoring, and consideration of an alternative, parenteral route of vitamin K administration rather than by the oral route due to potential for poor absorption.

Increasing Warfarin Dosage Reductions Associated with Concurrent Warfarin and Repeated Cycles of 5-Fluorouracil Therapy

Concurrent use of warfarin and 5-fluorouracil has resulted in elevated international normalized ratios (INRs). Although this drug interaction is well established in the literature, we found no documented cases that address its effects on anticoagulation parameters in patients requiring repeated cycles of 5-fluorouracil and continuous warfarin therapy. We describe the effect of multiple cycles of 5-fluorouracil administration in a patient receiving warfarin therapy. The patient's INR increased 11-14 days after each cycle of chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin. In addition, she required additive reductions of 33-42% in her weekly warfarin dose with each chemotherapy cycle to maintain a therapeutic INR (goal range 2.0-3.0). After three cycles of chemotherapy over a 10-week period, the patient's dosage requirements returned to her baseline level (before treatment with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin had started). Pertinent literature was reviewed to provide supporting evidence for the mechanism and clinical implications of the drug interaction. Based on this report and previous case reports, caution is advised when concurrent warfarin and 5-fluorouracil are prescribed. In addition, patients should be closely monitored for a possible delayed interaction that may occur with each repeated cycle of 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy.

Deadly drug interactions in emergency medicine

Many life-threatening drug interactions are predictable, avoidable events. Emergency medicine physicians have a responsibility to recognize and prevent drug interactions. Keeping current on the many pharmaceutical therapies,their pharmacology, and potential drug interactions currently represents one of the biggest challenges for emergency medicine practitioners. Using current drug interaction resources and knowing the limited number of medications that are responsible for the most serious drug interactions can ease this seemingly overwhelming burden greatly. Clinicians need to be particularly vigilant when prescribing drugs for patients who are taking medications with potential for drug interactions leading to serious consequences.

Abnormal coagulation studies associated with levofloxacin. Report of three cases

Complications arising from antibiotic use are of interest to neurosurgeons because many neurosurgical patients are treated for infection. In this report, the authors describe three patients with spine disorders who developed coagulopathies after treatment with levofloxacin, an antibiotic commonly used by neurosurgical services. Three patients with spine disorders developed urinary tract infections (UTIs) for which they received a 3-day course of oral levofloxacin. Subsequently, they demonstrated prolonged prothrombin times and increased international normalized ratios. One of those patients later developed acquired von Willebrand syndrome during surgery. Coagulopathies were successfully corrected preoperatively with parenteral vitamin K. The patient with acquired von Willebrand syndrome required multiple transfusions. There seems to be an association between levofloxacin and coagulation abnormalities in neurosurgical patients treated for UTIs. Neurosurgical services prescribing this common antibiotic should be aware of this problem.

Effect of levofloxacin coadministration on the international normalized ratios during warfarin therapy

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of levofloxacin coadministration on the international normalized ratio (INR) in patients receiving warfarin therapy.

DESIGN

Prospective analysis.

SETTING

Outpatient clinic at a Veterans Affairs medical center.

PATIENTS

Eighteen adult patients receiving warfarin.

INTERVENTION

On the basis of clinical diagnosis and judgment, levofloxacin was prescribed to the 18 patients for treatment of various types of infection. The INR was measured before and at 2-8-day intervals after the coadministration of levofloxacin therapy, and once after completing therapy. Warfarin dosages were adjusted when necessary.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Warfarin dosages were changed in seven patients as a result of the first nontherapeutic INR values obtained after start of levofloxacin therapy. Owing to a concern regarding noncompliance and the adverse effect of bleeding, warfarin dosage was adjusted in one patient even though his first INR value was in the high end of the therapeutic range (2.98, therapeutic range 2-3). One patient withdrew from the study after the first INR measurement after levofloxacin coadministration. Because of a concern about the possible bleeding complication, warfarin dosage was also adjusted in this patient after obtaining his first INR value. Therefore, only the INR values obtained before and the first INR values obtained after levofloxacin administration were compared to evaluate the effect of levofloxacin on INR determination of warfarin therapy. The INR values obtained before levofloxacin administration did not differ significantly from the first INR values obtained after levofloxacin coadministration (mean +/- SD 2.61 +/- 0.44 vs 2.74 +/- 0.83, 95% confidence interval -0.449-0.196, p=0.419).

CONCLUSION

The INR values measured before and after concomitant levofloxacin therapy were not significantly different. However, the ability to detect a significant difference may be affected by the small number of patients studied. Further studies with a larger sample are required to better determine the effect of levofloxacin coadministration on INR monitoring during warfarin therapy

The nature and frequency of potential warfarin drug interactions that increase the risk of bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation

PURPOSE

To determine the frequency with which atrial fibrillation (AF) patients receiving warfarin are prescribed interacting drugs that could increase bleeding risks.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined medical records for 704 Medicare beneficiaries > or = 65 years of age discharged from Kansas hospitals with AF. We identified all patients receiving warfarin and examined discharge prescriptions for drugs that could increase bleeding risk either by increasing the international normalized ratio (INR) or directly inhibiting hemostasis.

RESULTS

Of 256 patients discharged on warfarin, 138 (54%) were prescribed another medication that could increase bleeding risk. Among these patients, 106 (41%) were discharged with a total of 150 prescriptions for drugs that could interact with warfarin to increase the INR. Antibiotics accounted for 67% of these prescriptions. Fifty-three patients (21%) received 56 prescriptions for drugs which could inhibit hemostasis. These were primarily antiplatelet drugs with 61% of the prescriptions for aspirin. Patients with coronary artery disease were more likely than others to be prescribed warfarin plus antiplatelet agents (OR = 2.80; p = 0.04). More than one interacting drug was prescribed for 20% of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

AF patients discharged on warfarin were frequently prescribed concomitant medications that increase bleeding risks. These patients should be closely monitored and counseled to watch for signs of bleeding.

Pharmacokinetic aspects of treating infections in the intensive care unit: focus on drug interactions

Pharmacokinetic interactions involving anti-infective drugs may be important in the intensive care unit (ICU). Although some interactions involve absorption or distribution, the most clinically relevant interactions during anti-infective treatment involve the elimination phase. Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6 and 3A4 are the major isoforms responsible for oxidative metabolism of drugs. Macrolides (especially troleandomycin and erythromycin versus CYP3A4), fluoroquinolones (especially enoxacin, ciprofloxacin and norfloxacin versus CYP1A2) and azole antifungals (especially fluconazole versus CYP2C9 and CYP2C19, and ketoconazole and itraconazole versus CYP3A4) are all inhibitors of CYP-mediated metabolism and may therefore be responsible for toxicity of other coadministered drugs by decreasing their clearance. On the other hand, rifampicin is a nonspecific inducer of CYP-mediated metabolism (especially of CYP2C9, CYP2C19 and CYP3A4) and may therefore cause therapeutic failure of other coadministered drugs by increasing their clearance. Drugs frequently used in the ICU that are at risk of clinically relevant pharrmacokinetic interactions with anti-infective agents include some benzodiazepines (especially midazolam and triazolam), immunosuppressive agents (cyclosporin, tacrolimus), antiasthmatic agents (theophylline), opioid analgesics (alfentanil), anticonvulsants (phenytoin, carbamazepine), calcium antagonists (verapamil, nifedipine, felodipine) and anticoagulants (warfarin). Some lipophilic anti-infective agents inhibit (clarithromycin, itraconazole) or induce (rifampicin) the transmembrane transporter P-glycoprotein, which promotes excretion from renal tubular and intestinal cells. This results in a decrease or increase, respectively, in the clearance of P-glycoprotein substrates at the renal level and an increase or decrease, respectively, of their oral bioavailability at the intestinal level. Hydrophilic anti-infective agents are often eliminated unchanged by renal glomerular filtration and tubular secretion, and are therefore involved in competition for excretion. Beta-lactams are known to compete with other drugs for renal tubular secretion mediated by the organic anion transport system, but this is frequently not of major concern, given their wide therapeutic index. However, there is a risk of nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity with some cephalosporins and carbapenems. Therapeutic failure with these hydrophilic compounds may be due to haemodynamically active coadministered drugs, such as dopamine, dobutamine and furosemide, which increase their renal clearance by means of enhanced cardiac output and/or renal blood flow. Therefore, coadministration of some drugs should be avoided, or at least careful therapeutic drug monitoring should be performed when available. Monitoring may be especially helpful when there is some coexisting pathophysiological condition affecting drug disposition, for example malabsorption or marked instability of the systemic circulation or of renal or hepatic function.

Levofloxacin and warfarin interaction

Numerous case reports have documented an enhanced hypoprothrombinemic effect caused by an interaction between fluoroquinolones (most notably, ciprofloxacin) and warfarin sodium. Conflicting data exist regarding the clinical significance of this interaction. Two patients who had elevated international normalized ratios after receiving concurrent levofloxacin and warfarin sodium are described.

Ciprofloxacin-warfarin coagulopathy: a case series

Ciprofloxacin, when given to patients previously anticoagulated with warfarin, can occasionally cause an exaggerated hypoprothombinemic response and bleeding diatheses. Two such cases encountered at our institution are presented and data is combined with 64 cases reported to the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Spontaneous Reporting System (SRS) database, which included all cases reported from 1987 through 1997. Of 66 total cases the median age was 72 (range 36-94). The mean time to detection of the coagulopathy following the ciprofloxacin challenge was 5.5 days (n = 50). Hospitalization was reported in 15 cases, bleeding in 25 cases, and death in one case. The median prothrombin time (PT) and International Normalized Ratio (INR) was 38.0 (n = 13) and 10.0 (n = 23), respectively. The mean number of medications taken was 6.5 (n = 45). The mean time to correction was significantly shorter between the treated (2.5 days) and the untreated (4.0 days) groups (P < 0. 008). The ciprofloxacin-warfarin coagulopathy occurred most commonly in patients in their seventh decade and in those who require polypharmacy. Active treatment of the coagulopathy results in more rapid resolution than observation alone. Clinicians should be aware of the potential bleeding complications that can occur with the ciprofloxacin-warfarin drug-drug interaction.

Prediction of in vivo drug interaction from in vitro systems exemplified by interaction between verapamil and cimetidine using human liver microsomes and primary hepatocytes

Emphasis on drug safety is increasing as newly developed drugs become more potent. Interest in the prediction and description of drug interactions is growing accordingly. The study of potential interactions at a very early stage of drug development requires suitable in vitro models that describe drug interactions both qualitatively and quantitatively. The purpose of the work described here was to help assess the predictive value of in vitro drug interaction tests with liver microsomes and hepatocytes by means of the interaction between verapamil and cimetidine. The in vitro inhibition of verapamil metabolism by cimetidine observed during the studies was quantitatively similar to the results reported in published clinical studies after intravenous application. Studies using liver microsome fractions showed that the intrinsic clearances for the formation of various metabolites could be used to predict drug interactions. In addition, work with hepatocyte cultures revealed that an in vitro system covering both phase I and phase II reactions should be included in such studies to permit quantitative prediction of the various metabolic pathways. Both human hepatocyte cultures and human microsomes offer certain advantages for predicting the degree of drug metabolism and interactions in humans at the biotransformation level. Therefore, it seems likely that the simultaneous application of both systems will yield conclusions that most closely approximate the situation in humans.