A retrospective review of the relationship between facial fractures, head injuries, and cervical spine injuries

Incidence of Cervical Spine Injuries Associated with Maxillofacial Trauma and its Association with Facial Injury Severity

Introduction

Maxillofacial injuries are among the most common that present to the emergency department together with associated injuries to other systems. Trauma to maxillofacial region should raise a high suspicion for cervical spine injury. The presence or absence of cervical spine injury has important implications in trauma patients. Therefore, we conducted a study to assess the incidence of cervical spine injuries in maxillofacial trauma and to relate the severity of maxillofacial trauma.

Materials and Methods

A prospective analysis was conducted on 270 maxillofacial fracture patients who reported to casualty. All the patients were evaluated for facial injury severity scale (FISS), epidemiological demographic and clinical characteristics, the presence of cervical spine injuries and their severity.

Results

Of the 270 maxillofacial fracture patients, 2.96% had associated cervical spine injuries (CSI). Majority of CSI cases were caused by road traffic accidents (75%). Most of CSI occurred in association with mandibular fractures (55.2%), and most injuries occurred at the level of C6/C7 (62.5%). Most of the CSI had moderate FISS (87.5%). Neurological deficits were observed in 6 cases (75%) in which 5 patients had motor deficits and one patient had sensory deficient. Majority of patients had sustained major neurological deficits like quadriplegia (50%) followed by upper limb weakness and then tenderness.

Conclusion

All the patients who sustained maxillofacial injuries must be evaluated for cervical spine injuries to prevent life threatening conditions like neurological morbidities and even mortality. From our study, we concluded that as severity of facial injury increases, the chances of CSI also increase.

Pattern of associated brain injury in maxillofacial trauma: a retrospective study from a high-volume centre

The incidence of head injury in maxillofacial trauma patients varies widely in the literature. A good understanding of the patterns of association between these injuries would aid in efficient multidisciplinary treatment. The aim of this study therefore was to understand the associations between head injury and facial trauma by retrospectively analysing the records of patients seen at a tertiary care trauma centre. Demographic data were also described. Records of 4350 facial trauma patients over a five-year period were reviewed. A total of 3564 (81.9%) patients were victims of motor vehicle accidents (MVA). Male patients predominated, comprising 3711 (85.3%), and 36.6% were in the third decade of life. Facial fractures were seen in 2120 (48.7%), the most common being zygomatic fractures (60%). At the time of trauma, 2383 (57.3%) patients were under the influence of alcohol, and 2821 (87.8%) victims of two-wheeler MVAs were not using their helmet. Of all patients, 29.75% sustained a traumatic brain injury (TBI). Midface fractures were strongly associated with TBI. Maxillofacial injury may be considered a risk factor for TBI, and as such should immediately be suspected and investigated in all patients. Prompt recognition and management can improve outcomes in these patients.

Cervical Spine Injuries and Maxillofacial Trauma: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

Identify specific maxillofacial trauma patterns associated with cervical spine injuries.

METHODS

The protocol was developed according to (PRISMA-P) and was admitted to PROSPERO under accreditation code #CRD42020177816. Furthermore, the reporting of the present SR was conducted based on the PRISMA checklist.

RESULTS

Of the 1,407,750 patients recorded, a total of 115,997 patients (12.13%) had MFF with an associated CSI with a gender proportion (M:F) of 3.63:1 respectively. Motor vehicle accident was the most common cause of the combined Maxillofacial Trauma (MFT) and CSI. The most common CSI location was at the C2, followed by the C5 cervical spines. The most common location of a maxillofacial fracture resulting in a CSI was the mandible.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of the association of CSIs with MFT has been low (12.13%). Nevertheless, in cases of an isolated mandibular trauma due to a severe blow presenting with a low Glasgow Coma Scale, maxillofacial surgeons should be at a high alert of an associated CSI.

Mandibular Angle Fractures

Angle fractures are the most common among the mandibular fractures. History and physical examination are crucial in guiding time course and specifics of management. Computed tomography (CT) has become the gold standard for diagnosis of mandible fractures, offering advantages for both surgical planning and assessing dental involvement. Currently the use of a single monocortical plate with the Champy technique for osteosynthesis is used preferentially for noncomminuted fractures of the mandibular angle. Other load-sharing options for plating include strut plates, malleable plates, and geometric or 3D plates. Load-bearing options remain viable for comminuted fractures or other complex circumstances.

Identifying risk factors of cerebrovascular injuries following blunt mandible fracture; a retrospective study from a national data base

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine the risk factors of cerebrovascular injury (CVI) in patients with blunt mandible fractures.

METHODS

All patients who sustained a mandible fracture as a result of blunt force trauma from the 2012-2014 National Trauma Data Bank from the United State of America were included in the study. A CVI was noted as having occurred if there was an injury to the vertebral or carotid artery in the neck. Patients' demography, injury mechanism, and additional fractures were compared between the groups of patients with and without CVI using univariate analyses. In addition, a multivariate logistic regression model was fit to identify risk factors for CVI in this cohort. All two-sided p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Out of 29,398 patients who qualified for the study, only 398 (1.4%) patients sustained a CVI. There were significant differences (p < 0.001) identified between the groups regarding sex, race, mechanism of injury, occurrence of c-spine fracture, and of Le Fort II and III fractures in the univariate analysis. The risk factors identified by the multiple logistic regression model echoed these results and showed that female gender, injuries due to motorcycle, motor vehicle crashes and the presence of a cervical spine or Le Fort fracture were all associated with the occurrence of CVI (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The patients with mandible fracture who were female and sustained a high impact blunt force mechanism had a significantly higher risk of CVI. These high-risk patients should be screened for CVI at the time of initial evaluation.

Contemporary reconstruction after complex facial trauma

Complex facial trauma requires complex repair and solutions. This process is challenging for the surgeon who seeks to manage the expectations of the patient and family while achieving the best possible result. Historically, the use of pedicled flaps, and then free tissue transfer, were the primary techniques utilized. Advancements in soft-tissue reconstruction, such as perforator flaps and pre-expanded and prefabricated flaps, allow refinement of the soft-tissue reconstruction process to create the best initial soft-tissue coverage. The advent of contemporary technologies, such as virtual surgical planning, stereolithography and customized implants and plates, facilitates a tailored approach to the patient’s reconstructive needs for precise bony reconstruction. When surgical and technological techniques are combined in complementary multistage reconstructions, better reconstructive and aesthetic outcomes are achievable than ever before. In this review, the authors present a summary of the management of complex facial trauma based on the senior author’s broad experience. Initial management and contemporary reconstructive techniques and technology to provide optimal outcomes are reviewed. A case series of complex facial traumas and their reconstructive process is also presented to demonstrate how complementary staged procedures can yield an optimal result. We believe the reconstructive surgeon managing complex facial trauma should strive to incorporate contemporary technologies and techniques into their armamentarium to provide the best patient care.

Management of Frontal Bone Fractures

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to examine a level 1 trauma center's 12-year experience treating frontal sinus fractures with regards to patient demographics, management strategies, and treatment outcomes.

METHODS

An institutional review board-approved retrospective review of all facial fractures at a level 1 trauma center was performed for the years 2000 to 2012. Patient demographics, location of fractures, concomitant injuries, use of antibiotics, surgical management strategies and outcomes were collected for all frontal sinus fractures. A significance value of 5% was used.

RESULTS

There were 291 frontal sinus fractures treated at our institution. The mean age of patients was 34.4 years with a male predominance (90%). The most common mechanisms of injury were assault in 82 (28.2%) and motor vehicle accidents in 80 (27.5%). Anterior table fractures were seen in 261 patients (89.7%) and posterior table fractures were seen in 181 (62.2%). Treatment included ORIF with sinus preservation in 18 (6.2%), ORIF with sinus obliteration in 20 (6.9%), and cranialization in 18 (6.2%). Antibiotics were started on admission in 152 patients (52.2%). Fatality occurred in 9.3% of patients and complications included meningitis (1%), frontal sinusitis (1%), early wound infection (0.3%), and mucopyelocele (0.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Frontal sinus fractures in our center are most often caused by interpersonal violence. Anterior table fractures were more common than posterior table fractures and ORIF with sinus obliteration was the most common surgical intervention. Most frontal sinus fractures at our institution (82%) were treated conservatively with no surgical intervention and we observed a low rate of long term complications.

Unstable Cervical Spine Fracture in a Surfer Presenting as Concussion With Associated Low Grade Neck Pain: A Case Report

Objective

The purpose of this study is to describe the evaluation and management of a surfer who presented with concussion-like symptoms and was eventually diagnosed with an unstable cervical spine fracture.

Clinical Features

A young man presented to a chiropractic clinic 5 weeks after a surfing injury. He had mild lower cervical spine pain and complaints of cognitive disturbance. He was previously evaluated by his primary care provider who diagnosed cervical sprain and strain injuries. There was no prior imaging or follow-up concussion management.

Intervention and Outcome

After a history, exams were performed of the cervical spine, thoracic spine, shoulder, and head, including a modified Sport Concussion Assessment Tool, Third Edition, concussion evaluation. Cervical spine radiographs were taken, which demonstrated a right C6 pillar fracture grade 2 anterior spondylolisthesis. These findings were confirmed with a CT scan. The patient was referred to an orthopedic spine specialist for further consultation, which resulted in cervical fusion of the C6/7 motor unit.

Conclusion

The use of clinical guidelines for head and neck injury assisted in the appropriate management of this patient with cervical spine injury presenting with concussion symptoms.

An Algorithm for the Management of Concomitant Maxillofacial, Laryngeal, and Cervical Spine Trauma

Concomitant maxillofacial, laryngeal and cervical spine injuries may occur after high-energy accidents. Although this presentation is uncommon, the multiple injuries may compromise airway, breathing, circulation, and neurologic function. We identified 8 adult trauma patients admitted to the National University Hospital with the concomitant injuries. We reviewed the patient data and existing literature to identify the important factors that must be considered for management. Seven resulted from high velocity accidents, whereas 1 was assaulted. An algorithm that prioritizes in-tandem diagnosis and acute management of the adult trauma patient with maxillofacial, laryngeal, and cervical spine trauma was developed. The first priority is to assess airway, breathing, and circulation with cervical spine immobilization. Early diagnosis of patients with severe laryngeal injury, confirmation by video endoscopy, and establishing a surgical airway prevents airway obstruction or even a laryngotracheal dissociation. Urgent computed tomography scans of the head and neck are essential for definitive diagnosis and surgical planning for the 3 injuries. Prudent sequencing of surgery is important to avoid complications and to achieve better functional outcomes.

Mandible Fractures

Mandible fractures account for a significant portion of maxillofacial injuries and the evaluation, diagnosis, and management of these fractures remain challenging despite improved imaging technology and fixation techniques. Understanding appropriate surgical management can prevent complications such as malocclusion, pain, and revision procedures. Depending on the type and location of the fractures, various open and closed surgical reduction techniques can be utilized. In this article, the authors review the diagnostic evaluation, treatment options, and common complications of mandible fractures. Special considerations are described for pediatric and atrophic mandibles.

The facial skeleton: Armor to the brain?

BACKGROUND

With the development of urban setting worldwide, the major issue of concern is the increase in the mortality rate in the population due to road traffic accidents. The face, being the most exposed region is susceptible to injuries and maybe associated with injuries to the adjacent neuro-cranium. The literature has conflicting views on the relationship between facial fractures and head injuries with some authors opining that the facial skeleton cushions the brain while some other authors claim that the facial fractures act as indicators for head injuries.

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the correlation between the facial fractures and head injuries and to assess if the facial skeleton acts to protect the brain from injury.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospective study that included patients who reported to the emergency department of Basaveswar Teaching and General Hospital, Gulbarga, during 2 years, between August 2013 and July 2015 was conducted. A total of 100 patients with facial fractures were enrolled in the study.

RESULTS

Head injuries were sustained by 51 patients in the study. Maximum number of patients was in the age group of 20-29 with a male to female ratio of 10.1:1. The mandible was the most frequently fractured bone in the facial skeleton followed by the zygomatico-maxillary complex. A majority (96%) of patients with head injuries had fractures of either the upper third or the middle third of the face. Contusions and pneumocephalus were the most common head injury encountered. The Glasgow Coma Scale score was significantly lower in patients with associated head injuries as compared to those patients with facial trauma alone. The mortality rate in the study was 2% with both the victims having sustained middle third and upper third fractures respectively with associated head injuries.

CONCLUSION

The facial skeleton does not act to cushion the brain from injury but, in fact, the facial trauma victims should be considered potential head injury patients.

Pearls for Interpreting Computed Tomography of the Cervical Spine in Trauma

The high morbidity and mortality associated with cervical spine injuries makes identification and classification essential. It is important to have a systematic approach to evaluation, especially in the trauma setting with other distracting injuries. Understanding the anatomy and biomechanics enables rapid and accurate interpretation of images. In severe trauma and in patients with rigid spinal disease, the classic patterns of injury may be difficult or impossible to recognize. This article provides an approach to acquiring and interpreting cervical spine images in the setting of acute trauma and reviews the classic patterns of injury.

A review of cervical spine injury associated with maxillofacial trauma at a UK tertiary referral centre

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and patterns of cervical spine injury (CSI) associated with maxillofacial fractures at a UK trauma centre.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted of 714 maxillofacial fracture patients presenting to a single trauma centre between 2006 and 2012.

RESULTS

Of the 714 maxillofacial fracture patients, 2.2% had associated CSI including a fracture, cord contusion or disc herniation. In comparison, 1.0% of patients without maxillofacial trauma sustained a CSI (odds ratio: 2.2, p=0.01). The majority (88%) of CSI cases of were caused by a road traffic accident (RTA) with the remainder due to falls. While 8.8% of RTA related maxillofacial trauma patients sustained a CSI, only 2.0% of fall related patients did (p=0.03, not significant). Most (70%) of the CSIs occurred at C1/C2 or C6/C7 levels. Overall, 455, 220 and 39 patients suffered non-mandibular, isolated mandibular and mixed mandibular/non-mandibular fractures respectively. Their respective incidences of CSI were 1.5%, 1.8% and 12.8% (p=0.005, significant). Twelve patients with concomitant CSI had their maxillofacial fractures treated within twenty-four hours and all were treated within four days.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of maxillofacial trauma mandates exclusion and prompt management of cervical spine injury, particularly in RTA and trauma cases involving combined facial fracture patterns. This approach will facilitate management of maxillofacial fractures within an optimum time period.

Pearls of mandibular trauma management

Mandibular trauma is a common problem seen by plastic surgeons. When fractures occur, they have the ability to affect the patient's occlusion significantly, cause infection, and lead to considerable pain. Interventions to prevent these sequelae require either closed or open forms of reduction and fixation. Physicians determining how to manage these injuries should take into consideration the nature of the injury, background information regarding the patient's health, and the patient's comorbidities. Whereas general principles guide the management of the majority of injuries, special consideration must be paid to the edentulous patient, complex and comminuted fractures, and pediatric patients. These topics are discussed in this article, with a special emphasis on pearls of mandibular trauma management.

Analysis of maxillofacial fracture victims in the Wenchuan earthquake and Yushu earthquake

OBJECTIVE

To analyze retrospectively 419 patients after the Wenchuan earthquake and 46 after Yushu earthquake with maxillofacial fractures so as to provide reference on patients' treatment after an earthquake.

METHOD

We investigated 419 patients after Wenchuan earthquake and 46 after Yushu earthquake with maxillofacial fractures who were admitted to the West China Hospital of Stomatology and other 46 hospitals in 10 provinces.

RESULT

A total of 58 patients had maxillofacial fractures (13.8%) including 33 (56.9%) men and 25 (43.1%) women after the Wenchuan earthquake and 6 (13%) had maxillofacial fractures after Yushu earthquake. Most patients were injured by pressing or burying. The nasal-orbital-ethmoidal region was the most frequent site of the maxillofacial fracture (58.6% in the Wenchuan earthquake and 66.7% in the Yushu earthquake). The most prevalent pattern of maxillofacial fracture was multiple and/or comminuted fractures (87.9% in the Wenchuan earthquake and 100% in the Yushu earthquake). There were 48 (82.8%) patients with associated injuries, and the most common site was extremity injuries (58.6%) after Wenchuan earthquake. Few patients received adequate prehospital treatment, with bandages predominantly. Most patients (65.5% in the Wenchuan earthquake and 100% in the Yushu earthquake) underwent open reduction and rigid internal fixation. We failed to find any patients with generalized infection. However, all patients in our study presented the symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder.

CONCLUSION

We analyze the characteristics of maxillofacial fractures after the two earthquakes, so as to improve our medical emergency system when such disasters happen again.

Introduction to reading and clearing cervical spines for advanced practice nurses, Part I

This article is Part I of a two-part series and will focus on the key concepts of radiographic interpretation, functional cervical anatomy, and the interpretation and clearance of cervical spines in emergency care. In the subsequent issue, Part II will cover the additional epidemiology of cervical-spine injuries, specific injuries, case studies, and advanced diagnostic imaging.

Analysis of 46 maxillofacial fracture victims in the 2008 Wenchuan, China earthquake

PURPOSE

At 14:28 hours on May 12, 2008, a massive earthquake wracked most areas of Sichuan, China, causing catastrophic human loss. The aim of this study was to delineate the characteristics of victims with maxillofacial fractures in this disaster.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A descriptive analysis was conducted based on the medical records of earthquake maxillofacial injuries casualties transferred to West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, after the earthquake. Data regarding demographic details, psychological status, patterns, anatomic sites, etiology, concomitant injuries, and management of earthquake maxillofacial fractures were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 46 maxillofacial fracture patients' records of 28 (60.9%) males and 18 (39.1%) females were included in this study, with peak incidence (32.6%) in the elderly age group (older than 50 years). The most common etiology of earthquake maxillofacial fractures was building collapse (71.7%). The mandible (65.2%) was the most frequent site of the maxillofacial fracture, followed by the zygomatic complex (21.7%) and maxilla (13.0%). The most prevalent of maxillofacial fracture pattern was multiple and/or comminuted fractures (56.5%), which accounted for 72.7% (24/33) in building collapse injury group. There were 9 (19.6%) patients with significant concomitant injuries and the most common site of concomitant injuries was the head (4 cases) and extremity (4 cases). Four (8.7%) patients' maxillofacial fractures were treated conservatively, 16 (34.8%) underwent closed reduction and fixation, and 26 (56.5%) underwent open reduction and rigid internal fixation (RIF). Apart from 3 patients (6.5%) who showed infection, all patients with facial fractures achieved successful bony union with an acceptable occlusion and facial form. Additionally, it is noteworthy that all patients in our study presented the symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

CONCLUSION

There is a variation of mechanism of injuries, age group, severity, patterns, concomitant injuries, and management of earthquake maxillofacial fractures. Knowledge of these characteristics provides useful strategies for patient care and prevention of further complications. A multidisciplinary and coordinated approach is important for optimum stabilization and ongoing treatment of victims of building collapse injury. The high percentage of PTSD confirms that psychologists should form an integral part of this multidisciplinary team.

The pattern of combined maxillofacial and cervical spine fractures

PURPOSE

Prompt recognition of cervical fractures in patients with facial fractures is of prime importance, as failure to diagnose such injuries carries a significant risk of causing neurologic abnormalities, long-term disabilities, and even death. The aim of this retrospective case study is to describe the different patterns of combinations of maxillofacial and cervical spine (C-spine) injuries to provide guidance in diagnosis and care of patients with combined injuries.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The trauma directory of 1 academic institution was searched for records of 701 patients admitted with cervical spine fractures between January 2000 and June 2006. Patients who did not sustain a facial fracture in addition to their C-spine fracture were excluded. The search was narrowed to 44 patients (6.26%) who presented with combined C-spine and facial fractures. Descriptive statistics were performed in which the frequencies of the variables were presented and then exploration of the interaction between the different variables was carried out.

RESULTS

A 6.28% incidence rate of combined C-spine and maxillofacial fractures is noted in this study. The most common cause of trauma was motor vehicle accidents (45.5%), followed by falls (36.4%). In regards to the types of maxillofacial fractures, 27.3% of the cases presented with isolated orbital fractures and 13.6% with isolated mandibular fractures. A total of 68.2% of the combined C-spine and facial fracture cases involved orbital fractures of some form. The most frequent level of C-spine fracture was isolated C2 fractures (31.8%) followed by isolated C4 and C6 fractures (6.8% each). When the mechanism of trauma were compared to the types of C-spine and maxillofacial fractures, falls were found to be the most frequent mechanism causing both isolated orbital and C2 fractures.

CONCLUSION

The rule of presuming that all patients with maxillofacial fractures have an unstable C-spine injury should stand. This should be emphasized in patients with orbital fractures and we plead for a higher index of suspicion for C-spine injuries in such patients.

Traumatic intracranial haemorrhage in conscious patients with facial fractures--a review of 1959 cases

OBJECTIVE

Facial fracture patients who are conscious with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 15 in the absence of clinical neurological abnormalities are commonly not expected to have suffered severe intracranial pathology. However, high velocity impact may result in intracranial haemorrhage in different compartments.

METHODS

Over a 7-year period, 1959 facial fracture patients with GCS scores of 15 and the absence of neurological abnormalities were analysed. In 54 patients (2.8%) computed tomography scans revealed the presence of accompanying intracranial haemorrhage (study group). These patients were compared with the 1905 patients without intracranial haemorrhage (control group).

RESULTS

Univariate analysis identified accompanying vomiting/nausea and seizures, cervical spine injuries, cranial vault and basal skull fractures to be significantly associated with intracranial bleeding. In multivariate analysis the risk was increased nearly 25-fold if an episode of vomiting/nausea had occurred. Seizures increased the risk of bleeding more than 15-fold. The mean functional outcome of the study group according to the Glasgow Outcome Scale was 4.7+/-0.7.

CONCLUSION

Intracranial haemorrhage cannot be excluded in patients with facial fractures despite a GCS score of 15 and normal findings following neurological examination. Predictors, such as vomiting/nausea or seizures, skull fractures and closed head injuries, enhance the likelihood of an intracranial haemorrhage and have to be considered.

Correlating Facial Fractures and Cranial Injuries

PURPOSE

This study retrospectively evaluated individuals with traumatic injuries from different mechanisms and tried to determine if there is any relationship between various isolated or combined fractures of facial skeleton and cranial injuries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively studied hospital charts of all patients who reported to the trauma center at Kasturba Hospital in Manipal with facial fractures and suspected cranial injuries during a 5-year period (January 1, 1995 to December 31, 1999). These patients were admitted to the Department of Neurosurgery or the Maxillofacial Unit of Kasturba Hospital, Manipal. The complete medical record of each patient was reviewed, recording the following in a standard format: age, gender, cause of injury, type of facial fractures, type of cranial bone fracture, concussion, intracranial injury, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea, CSF otorrhea, and the Glasgow coma scale.

RESULTS

The study data were collected as part of retrospective analysis. A total of 12,329 patients reported to the trauma center of the study hospital during a 5-year period with various injuries. A total of 772 patients had facial fractures (6%). A total of 108 patients with a combination of cranial injuries and facial fractures were identified within this group (14%). Gender predilection was seen to favor males (90%) more than females (10%). The ratio was seen to be nearly 9:1. The ages of the patients ranged from 7 to 70 years with mean age being 32 years (standard deviation [SD] = +/-12). Central midfacial bone involvement was found to be more commonly associated with head injury.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a correlation between midfacial injuries and CNS trauma. A more exhaustive multicentric case-control study with a larger sample and additional parameters will be essential to reach definite conclusions regarding the spectrum of head injuries associated with facial fractures.

Emergency care in facial trauma--a maxillofacial and ophthalmic perspective

Facial trauma, with or without life- and sight-threatening complications, may arise following isolated injury, or it may be associated with significant injuries elsewhere. Assessment needs to be both systematic and repeated, with the establishment of clearly stated priorities in overall care. Although the American College of Surgeons Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) system of care is generally accepted as the gold standard in trauma care, it has potential pitfalls when managing maxillofacial injuries, which are discussed. Management of facial trauma can arguably be regarded as "facial orthopaedics", as both specialities share common management principles. This review outlines a working approach to the identification and management of life- and sight-threatening conditions following significant facial trauma.

The management and treatment of cervical spine injuries

This is a burst fracture of the ring of C1 (Figure 10). This fracture is caused by a compressive downward force that is transmitted evenly through the occipital condyles to the superior articular surfaces of the lateral masses of C1. This process displaces the masses laterally and causes fractures of the anterior and posterior arches, along with possible disruption of the transverse ligament. Quadruple fracture of all four aspects of the C1 ring occurs.

Emergency department intubation of trauma patients with undiagnosed cervical spine injury

OBJECTIVES

Some trauma patients have an undiagnosed cervical spine injury but require immediate airway control. This paper reports an emergency department's (ED) experience with these patients. In particular, is there a worse neurological outcome?

METHODS

A retrospective study over 6.5 years, based on prospectively collected data from the Royal Perth Hospital trauma registry. Patients with a cervical spine injury were identified and clinical data were abstracted. The primary outcome measure was evidence of exacerbation of cervical spine injury as a result of intubation by ED medical staff.

RESULTS

308 patients (1.9%) of the 15 747 trauma patients were intubated by ED medical staff. Thirty seven (12%) were subsequently verified to have a cervical spine injury, of which 36 were managed with orotracheal intubation. Twenty five (69%) survived to have a meaningful post-intubation neurological examination. Fourteen (56%) of these 25 patients had an unstable cervical spine injury. Ninety per cent of all ED intubations were by ED medical staff. No worsening of neurological outcomes occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Every ninth trauma patient that this ED intubates has a cervical spine injury. Intubation by ED medical staff did not worsen neurological outcome. In the controlled setting of an ED staffed by senior practitioners, patients with undiagnosed cervical spine injury can be safely intubated.

Facial computed tomography use in trauma patients who require a head computed tomogram

PURPOSE

Head-injured patients admitted to a trauma center may or may not have associated facial fractures. Most head-injured patients undergo head computed tomography (CT) scan early in their evaluation. The question of adding a facial CT at the time of the head CT can be unclear. The aims of our study are 1) to analyze how the facial CT is used in conjunction with the head CT in facial fracture trauma patients, 2) to recognize unique identifiers that would aid the surgeon's decision-making process to order a facial CT in continuity with a head CT, and 3) to examine what is characteristic of head trauma patients who receive a facial CT separately, at some point after the head CT. Materials and methods Data were retrospectively reviewed for a 5-year period at a level I trauma center in which all patients who present with craniomaxillofacial trauma are managed by the oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) service. Included patients must have obtained a head CT during initial resuscitation and be diagnosed with a facial fracture during the same hospital stay. These patients were divided into 3 groups: those who had a 1) head CT only, 2) head CT and facial CT at the same time, and 3) head CT with the facial CT performed at a later time.

RESULTS

A total of 9,871 patients were admitted to the trauma service during a 5-year period and 4,926 patients (49.9%) had head CT performed. Of this group, 12% had facial fractures, and the most common associated injury in this group was facial lacerations and concussions. The nasal fracture followed by the orbital fracture was the most common fracture type. Eighty-four percent of the time, the facial CT was used to help diagnose facial fractures in this patient population. The 3 different groups showed unique trends.

CONCLUSION

Six points were identified in our study that can augment the physical examination in patients who require head CT. The following points can help prompt the clinician to order a combination head and facial CT: 1) 12% of trauma patients who require a head CT will have a facial fracture, whereas half of these patients will have multiple facial fractures. 2) Orbital fractures are commonly missed in this group and often require a secondary scan such as coronal views for accurate diagnosis. 3) Facial lacerations correlate with ordering a combination head and facial CT. 4) The most common facial fracture identified among patients receiving a trauma head CT is the nasal fracture. 5) The use of the facial CT in more severely injured patients tended to be delayed and was related to increased hospital and intensive care unit days. 6) Only 16% of facial fracture patients who had received an initial trauma head CT did not require further facial CT scanning.

Cranio-maxillofacial trauma: a 10 year review of 9,543 cases with 21,067 injuries

INTRODUCTION

Cranio-maxillofacial trauma management requires pertinent documentation. Using a large computerized database, injury surveillance and research data describe the whole spectrum of injuries. The goal of this study was to assess the effect of the five main causes of accidents resulting in facial injury on the severity of cranio-maxillofacial trauma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

During a period of 10 years (1991-2000) 9,543 patients were admitted to the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital of Innsbruck with cranio-maxillofacial trauma. Data of patients were prospectively recorded including cause of injury, age and gender, type of injury, injury mechanisms, location and frequency of soft tissue injuries, dentoalveolar trauma, facial bone fractures and concomitant injuries. Statistical analyses performed included descriptive analysis, chi square test, Fisher's exact test, and Mann-Whitney's U test. This was followed by logistic regression analyses for the three injury types to determine the impact of the five main causes on the type of injury at different ages in facial trauma patients.

RESULTS

Five major categories/mechanisms of injury existed: in 3,613 (38%) cases it was activity of daily life, in 2991 (31%) sports, 1170 (12%) violence, in 1,116 (12%) traffic accidents, in 504 (5%) work accidents and in 149 (2%) other causes. A total of 3,578 patients (37.5%) had 7,061 facial bone fractures, 4,763 patients (49.9%) suffered from 6,237 dentoalveolar, and 5,968 patients (62.5%) from 7,769 soft tissue injuries. Gender distribution showed an overall male-to-female ratio of 2.1 to 1 and the mean age was 25.8+/-19.9 years; but both varied greatly depending on the injury mechanism (facial bone fractures: 35.4+/-19.5 years, higher risk for males; soft tissue injuries: 28.7+/-20.5, no gender preference; dentoalveolar trauma: 18+/-15.6, elevated risk for females). For patients sustaining facial trauma, logistic regression analyses revealed increased risks for facial bone fractures (225%), soft tissue lesions (58%) in patients involved in traffic accidents, and dental trauma (49%) during activities of daily life and play accidents. When compared with other causes, the probability of suffering soft tissue injuries and dental trauma, but not facial bone fractures, is higher in sports-related accidents, 12 and 16%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study differentiated between injury mechanisms in cranio-maxillofacial trauma. The specially trained surgeons treating cranio-maxillofacial trauma are the primary source of information for the public and legislators on implementing preventive measures for high-risk activities. In facial trauma, older persons are prone to bone fractures (increase of 4.4%/year of age) and soft tissue injuries (increase of 2%/year of age) while younger persons are more susceptible to dentoalveolar trauma (decrease of 4.5%/year of age).

Etiology and patterns of facial fractures in the United Arab Emirates

A retrospective study on facial fractures was carried out in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at Tawam Hospital (Al Ain, United Arab Emirates) between January 1, 1998 and December 31, 2001. The study included 144 patients with a mean age of 26.5 years; the most frequently injured patients belonged to the 16- to 20-year-old age group. The male predilection was 83%. Road traffic accident was the most common causative factor (59%), followed by falls (21.5%), accidents where camels were involved (5.5%), work- and sport-related accidents (4.8% and 4.8%, respectively), and assault (4.1%). A total of 53.4% of the patients suffered isolated mandibular fractures, 32.6% had isolated midface fractures, and 13.8% had combined midface and mandibular fractures. Associated injuries were noted in 22.2% of the patients. The number of patients treated increased from 28.3 (1990-1995) to 36 (1998-2001) on an annual average; a reduction in isolated nasal fractures and associated injuries, including facial lacerations, was noted with no change in age or etiology predilection. Sufficient data could not be obtained to determine if the favorable results with the associated injuries were a result of the effect of a compulsory seat belt law introduced on June 1, 1998, but the increasing number of maxillofacial injuries suggests that the seat belt law is ignored in this country.

Facial fractures and concomitant injuries in trauma patients

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Maxillofacial fractures often occur with serious concomitant injury in trauma patients, and knowledge of the type and severity of associated injuries can assist in rapid assessment and treatment. The objective was to identify the most commonly occurring injuries associated with facial fractures in severely injured trauma patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Review of medical records.

METHODS

A retrospective review was made of 151 patients with facial fractures presenting to a level-one trauma center over a 4-year span. All patients had an injury severity score of 12 or greater. Chart data recorded included demographics, etiology, presentation, facial fracture site, concomitant injury, imaging studies, hospital stay and course, interventions, and outcome.

RESULTS

The most common cause or origin of facial fracture was assault (41%), followed by motor vehicle accident (26.5%). Orbital fracture was the most common overall facial fracture (24.2%), with nasal fractures being the most common isolated fracture (23.2%). Cerebral hematoma occurred in 43.7% of patients, with subdural hematoma being the most frequent. Pulmonary injury was the second most commonly associated injury (31.1%) with lung contusion being the most frequent. Seventy-two patients (42%) required intubation, and 22 (14.8%) required tracheostomy during their hospital stay. The hospital complication rate was 50.3% and included primarily pulmonary complications, septicemia, renal failure, and severe anemia. Thirteen patients died during their hospital stay; 11 of them died of neurologic injuries, 1 of pulmonary failure, and 1 of overwhelming sepsis.

CONCLUSIONS

Cerebral and pulmonary injuries are often associated with maxillofacial fractures in severely injured trauma patients. Knowledge of these associated injuries provides useful strategies for patient care and prevention of further complications. A multidisciplinary and coordinated approach is important for optimum stabilization and ongoing treatment of patients with facial fractures.

Do Facial Fractures Protect the Brain or are they a Marker for Severe Head Injury?

Facial fractures (FF) have been suggested to protect the brain from severe injury. However, others have stated that facial fractures are a marker for increased risk of brain injury. The aim of this study is to evaluate the association between facial fractures, brain injury, and functional outcome. A retrospective review of our prospective trauma database was performed for blunt trauma patients during a 7-year period (January 1993 through December 1999) at the University of Louisville Hospital. We identified 7324 blunt trauma patients at a Level 1 trauma center. Severity of head injury in patients with and without FF was compared. The severity of brain injury was evaluated by admission Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) as well as specific head, neck, cervical spine, and face Acute Injury Score (AIS). Length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, hospital stay, and Functional Independence Measures (FIM) score were also identified. A total of 1068 (14.6%) patients were diagnosed with FF; of these 848 (79.4%) patients suffered some form of brain injury by CT abnormality, clinical examination, or both. A total of 2192 patients were treated for head injury without FF; 220 patients were treated for FF without head injury. FF with traumatic brain injury (TBI) were found to occur significantly greater than FFs without TBI ( P < 0.001). The mean GCS on admission for FF with head injury was 12, which was similar to that of patients with head injury alone with a GCS of 10 but was significantly less than that of patients with FF alone with a GCS of 15 ( P < 0.05). Injury Severity Score for patients with FF and head injury was significantly worse compared with patients with head injury alone and those with FF alone ( P < 0.0001). Mean ICU stay and hospital stay were similar for all three groups (ranges 3–6 and 6–12 days); and were not significant ( P < 0.06). FIM score was significantly lower for patients with FF and head injury compared with FF alone ( P = 0.0003) and similar to that of patients with head injury. FF were found to have a significantly greater incidence of TBI. FF with TBI had a similar severity of head injury when compared with patients with head injury alone by demonstrating similar GCS, AIS of the head and neck, and early functional recovery. This analysis does not support the hypothesis that the face provides a protective effect for the brain and therefore leading to a more favorable short-term outcome. Thus patients with facial fractures should be treated with the same caution as patients with significant blunt head trauma.

Prevalence of cervical spine injuries in patients with facial trauma

OBJECTIVE

Injuries to the spine may accompany facial trauma. By using a large computerized database the goal of this case control study was to assess the association between facial and cervical spine injuries among patients sustaining facial trauma.

STUDY DESIGN

During a period of 4 years (1995 to 1998) 3083 patients, 10 years or older, with facial injuries were admitted to the University Hospital of Innsbruck's Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery for facial trauma. Records were analyzed for cause of injury, age and gender distribution, frequency and type of injury, and frequency of cervical spine injuries in relation to facial trauma and concomitant injuries. Two hundred six (6.7%) of these patients had experienced a concomitant cervical spine injury (case group). All other patients (2877) were assigned to the control group of facial trauma only.

RESULTS

Facial trauma patients with concomitant cervical spine injuries were significantly older (mean age, 42 vs 34 years); no difference existed for the female/male ratio of 30:70. Sports trauma was the main cause of facial trauma in the control group (37.4%), yet traffic accidents accounted for 43.7% of combined facial and cervical spine injuries in the case group. Central mid face fractures dominated in the case group and lateral mid face fractures in the control group. In the case group cervical spine fractures and dislocations occurred in 19.2%. None of them showed evidence of paralysis. Concomitant brain injuries occurred in 21.6% of the case group and 8.8% of the control group. For patients sustaining facial trauma, logistic regression analysis revealed reduced risks for additional cervical spine injuries in younger patients, female patients, absence of brain injury, and in patients with facial soft tissue lesions alone (58.2%) or dental trauma alone (77.5%).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study underline the importance of proper clinical and computed tomographic evaluation in cases of facial fractures for recognition of additional cervical spine trauma. Detection of cervical spine trauma can be missed, especially when pain or symptoms from other parts of the body dominate. The typical patient with concomitant neck and facial trauma is male, 40 years old, and usually involved in a traffic accident.

The incidence of combined facial and cervical spine injuries

BACKGROUND

The association between facial and cervical spine injuries has been documented. However, only severe spinal injuries were included in previous analyses. It was the purpose of this study to evaluate the incidence of and risk factors for these injury combinations including the complete injury spectrum.

METHODS

Between 1995 and 1997, 4,907 patients with cervical spine injuries were treated at our hospital. One hundred five (2.14%) of these patients had suffered a concomitant facial injury. This group was compared with the group of patients with cervical spine injury but without facial trauma.

RESULTS

The majority of cases (98%) consisted of minor lesions to both regions. With increasing severity of cervical spine trauma, the risk for facial injury increased. Age and male gender represent significant (p < 0.05) risk factors for combined injuries.

CONCLUSION

Patients sustaining cervical spine trauma have a small but real chance of injuring their face as well. The cervical spine must be examined carefully, whenever facial injuries are present.

Acute life-threatening injuries in facial fracture patients: a review of 1,025 patients

BACKGROUND

The literature on facial fractures has emphasized obstruction of the airway as the most common associated life-threatening problem. Other life-threatening injuries associated with facial fractures are not as well documented. For this reason, we conducted a retrospective study involving 1,025 patients with facial fractures admitted to the trauma center at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital in Taiwan from January 1995 through December 1998.

METHODS

This study identifies the incidence of facial fractures and establishes a management plan. Life-threatening injuries associated with facial fractures were those that warranted immediate invasive rescue procedures.

RESULTS

Sixty-four (6.2%) of the patients with facial fractures required life-saving intervention; 21 patients had cerebral trauma prompting craniotomy, 19 had hemorrhagic shock, 17 had airway compromise, and 7 had pulmonary injury grave enough to necessitate tube thoracostomy. There were five mortalities, three due to cerebral trauma and two credited to hemorrhagic shock not identified until long after admission.

CONCLUSION

These findings illustrate the need for prompt identification and proper management of the associated life-threatening injuries in facial fracture patients. Clinical assessment should begin with evaluation of cerebral trauma, followed by hemorrhagic shock, airway compromise, and hemopneumothorax. Proper management may require a multidisciplinary and coordinated team approach.

Assessment of patients with facial fractures

One of the most demanding aspects of emergency medicine is the management of patients who have suffered facial trauma. The diagnosis and initial management of patients who have sustained traumatic facial injuries are discussed. The fundamentals required to assess patients with fractures of the facial skeleton and to make appropriate referrals are provided.

The relationship between facial fractures and death from neurologic injury

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to review patients who failed to survive blunt trauma and to determine whether there is a relationship between specific facial fracture patterns and death.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective record review of patients with facial fractures admitted to a level I trauma center between January 1, 1993 and December 31, 1996. Records were reviewed for gender, age, injury severity score (ISS), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), revised probability of survival (RPS), cause of death, and facial fracture pattern. Facial fracture patterns were grouped as lower face (mandible), midface (maxilla, zygoma, nose, and orbits), and upper face (frontal bone). Causes of death were grouped into neurologic, visceral, combined neurologic and visceral, and other. Surviving and nonsurviving groups were compared. Parametric data were analyzed with a pooled or separate variance t-test, nonparametric data with a Mann-Whitney U-test, and categorical variables with a chi-square test (P < or = .05). The odds ratio with corresponding 95% confidence intervals was used to show the association between facial fracture patterns and death.

RESULTS

During the 4-year period, 6,117 patients were admitted with blunt trauma, 661 (11%) of whom had facial fractures. Those who died were more likely to be older than those who survived, with a lower GCS, lower RPS, and higher ISS. Although there was a male predominance in the patient population, there was no gender difference between those who died and those who survived. Surviving patients were more likely to have only isolated mandible injuries. Nonsurvivors were more likely to have isolated midface fractures or combinations of midface and other facial fractures. The odds ratio showed a 13 to 75 times greater risk of patients dying of neurologic injury with patterns other than isolated mandible injury than with any mid- or upper-facial fracture patterns.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with survivors, nonsurviving patients with facial fractures were older and had a lower GCS, higher ISS, and lower RPS. Nonsurviving patients had a dramatic predilection for mid- and upper-facial fracture patterns and death of neurologic injury.

Value of complete cervical helical computed tomographic scanning in identifying cervical spine injury in the unevaluable blunt trauma patient with multiple injuries: a prospective study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the role of routine helical computed tomographic (CT) scan of the entire cervical spine in high-risk patients with multiple injuries.

METHODS

Prospective study of patients with severe blunt multiple injuries, requiring intensive care unit admission and CT scan of another body area besides the cervical spine. All patients were evaluated by means of standard cervical spine radiography. A complete cervical spine CT scan was performed during the same trip to the scanner in which other body areas were evaluated. The plain films and the CT scans were read by a radiologist in a blinded manner.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients fulfilled the criteria for inclusion in the study. The mean Glasgow Coma Scale score was 8.9 and the mean Injury Severity Score was 24.1. Twenty patients (34.4%) had cervical spine injuries (12 stable and 8 unstable injuries). Plain radiography missed eight injuries (including three unstable) and its sensitivity was 60%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value 100%, and negative predictive value 85.1%. The helical CT scan missed two spinal injuries (both stable) and its sensitivity was 90%, specificity was 100%, positive predictive value = 100%, negative predictive value = 95%.

CONCLUSION

There is a high incidence of cervical spine injuries in the severe, blunt, multiple-injury, unevaluable patients requiring intensive care unit admission. Plain radiography alone is not reliable in diagnosing many cervical spine injuries. Complete cervical spiral computed tomography is superior to plain radiography. It is suggested that in this selected group of patients, both plain radiography and spiral computed tomography should be performed.

Cervical spine imaging in patients with trauma: determination of fracture risk to optimize use

PURPOSE

To develop a method to use clinically apparent factors to determine cervical spine fracture risk to guide selection of optimal imaging strategies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Records from 472 patients with trauma (168 with fractures, 304 control patients) who visited the emergency department in 1994 and 1995 were reviewed for 20 potential predictors of cervical spine fracture in this retrospective case-control study. Simple logistic regression was used to determine predictors of cervical spine fracture. Prediction rules were formulated by using multiple logistic regression and recursive partitioning with bootstrap validation. Posttest fracture probabilities were calculated from base prevalence and likelihood ratios derived for predictors by using Bayes theorem.

RESULTS

Predictors of cervical spine fracture included severe head injury (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 8.5, 95% CI: 4.0, 17.0), high-energy cause (OR = 11.6, 95% CI: 5.4, 25.0), and focal neurologic deficit (OR = 58, 95% CI: 12, 283). The prediction rule was used to stratify patients into groups with fracture probabilities of 0.04%-19.70%. After adjusting for overfitting, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.87.

CONCLUSION

Clinically apparent factors, including cause of injury, associated injuries, and age, can be used to determine the probability of cervical spine fracture. Development of evidence-based imaging guidelines should incorporate knowledge of fracture probability.

Addressing the myths of cervical spine injury management

Every year in the United States about 5,000 people sustain a cervical spinal cord injury. Vastly greater numbers present to hospitals after motor vehicle crashes and falls with potential cervical spine injuries (CSI) for evaluation. This group of patients requires very careful management while undergoing evaluation for potential CSI to minimize the potential for spinal cord injury. It is, therefore, incumbent on everyone caring for these patients to distinguish between fact and fiction in regard to CSI management. This article addresses the following areas of controversy: CSI is a rare injury; patients with cranial and facial injuries are at increased risk for CSI; everyone with a significant mechanism of injury needs radiological clearance of their cervical spine; a normal cross-table lateral view radiograph excludes significant CSI; oral intubation of patients with CSI is not safe; a semi-rigid collar prevents movement of the cervical spine; and the evaluation of the cervical spine needs to begin in the resuscitation room in every patient.

Cervical spine injury in maxillofacial trauma

OBJECTIVE

To find out the incidence of associated facial injuries and injuries to the cervical spine.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Teaching hospital, India.

SUBJECTS

536 patients treated for maxillofacial injuries between January 1992 and November 1993.

INTERVENTIONS

Review of hospital case notes and radiographs.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Coexisting facial and cervical spine injuries, morbidity and mortality.

RESULTS

16 patients (3%) had sustained both facial and cervical spine injuries. There were 14 men (median age 40, range 21-64) and 2 women (aged 19 and 30). In 10 of the 16 patients the cause of the injury was a road traffic accident. In 11 patients the facial injury was to the soft tissue only, in 4 it was to both hard and soft tissue, and in 1 it was to hard tissue only. Soft tissue damage to the midface was more likely to be associated with injuries in the area of C5-7 and that to the lower third of the face was more likely to be associated with damage to the upper cervical spine. 11 patients had neurological deficits as a result of their injuries and 2 died.

CONCLUSION

If diagnosis and treatment of simultaneous facial and cervical spine injuries are to be improved, further study of the biomechanics of injury is necessary.