[Remission of severe hypoglycemic incidents in young diabetic children treated with subcutaneous infusion]

Temporal Trends for Diabetes Management and Glycemic Control Between 2010 and 2019 in Korean Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes

Purpose: There is increasing use of modern devices in the management of patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D). We investigated temporal trends for diabetes management and outcomes in Korean pediatric T1D patients over 10 years. Methods: We retrospectively collected the data from 752 participants (boys: 311, 41.4%) diagnosed with T1D and aged ≤18 years, with ≥1 year of follow-up between 2010 and 2019 in any of the seven study hospitals in Korea. Results: Over the 10-year study period, use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) increased from 1.4% to 39.3%. From 2010 to 2019, there was an increased use of multiple daily insulin injections (MDI; 63.9%-77.0%, respectively) and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII; 2.1%-14.0%, respectively), but decreased use of conventional insulin therapy (CIT, 33.9%-9.0%, respectively). Mean glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) decreased from 8.56% to 8.01% (P < 0.001) and was lower in younger patients, boys, and CGM users (P < 0.001). MDI and CSII users had lower mean HbA1c levels than CIT users (P = 0.003). Regarding the acute complications of T1D, CGM use was associated with lower incidences of diabetic ketoacidosis (P = 0.015); CSII users were likely to experience less severe hypoglycemia (P = 0.008). Conclusions: The use of CSII and CGM increased ∼7- and 30-fold, respectively, over the 10-year study period. The glycemic control of pediatric T1D patients in Korea improved from 2010 to 2019, probably because of increased use of T1D technologies.

[The social integration of children with diabetes]

Despite the regulatory programmes in place, the social integration of children with diabetes, in particular younger children, is still unsatisfactory. The lack of autonomy of the young child requires the active participation of adults in child care facilities and schools to administer and monitor their treatment. The training of all staff working with children is essential for their successful integration.

Access of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes to insulin pump therapy has greatly increased in France since 2001

AIM

Insulin pump therapy is an emerging option in the management of type 1 diabetes (T1D), but it often remains unused. For this reason, in 2007, a French national survey was carried out to update the frequency of insulin pump use in the paediatric population compared with a previous survey done in 2001.

METHODS

The present survey was performed in hospital departments involved in paediatric diabetes management (n = 67) and in adult departments involved in adolescent diabetes management (n = 113). The number of T1D children (age < 18 years) treated in each department, with or without the use of an insulin pump, and the number of insulin pump therapies initiated during the previous year were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 60 paediatric and 28 adult centres responded, involving 9073 T1D children and adolescents (93% in paediatric departments). Of these patients, 1461 (16%) were treated by insulin pump, 89% of which were managed in paediatric centres. However, pump use was more frequent in adult than in paediatric centres (32% versus 18%, respectively). Also, 38% of insulin pumps were initiated during the year prior to the survey. In addition, in 2001, 140 children were treated with insulin pump in 13 paediatric centres (versus 56 centres in 2007).

CONCLUSION

The number of centres using insulin pump therapy for diabetic children and the number of children treated by insulin pump were increased fourfold and 10-fold, respectively, from 2001 to 2007, indicating greater access to pump therapy in the French paediatric population. The present survey is still ongoing to evaluate the decision-making criteria that influence the initiation of insulin pump therapy in T1D paediatric patients.

Equal metabolic control but superior caregiver treatment satisfaction with insulin aspart in preschool children

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the metabolic outcomes, safety, and caregiver treatment satisfaction of basal-bolus multiple daily injection (MDI) therapy with mealtime insulin aspart (IAsp) or human insulin (HI) (both with basal NPH insulin), or of continuous subcutaneous infusion (CSII) with IAsp in preschool-age children with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

After a 3-week HI MDI run-in, 61 children <7 years old were randomized to IAsp MDI or HI MDI or allocated to IAsp CSII for 26 weeks. Efficacy measures were glycated hemoglobin (A1C) and overall metabolic control at study end point. Safety evaluation included hypoglycemia and adverse events. Caregiver treatment satisfaction was evaluated using a World Health Organization questionnaire with 7-point scale answers.

RESULTS

A1C level and overall metabolic control remained unchanged in all groups. Minor hypoglycemic episodes were equivalent between groups; few major hypoglycemic events occurred. Caregivers of children receiving IAsp CSII documented a greater increase in treatment satisfaction total scores (P = 0.04 vs. HI MDI and IAsp MDI group) and expressed satisfaction with the frequency of hypoglycemic events.

CONCLUSIONS

After 26 weeks of treatment with IAsp CSII, IAsp MDI, or HI MDI, all metabolic control parameters remained unchanged and equivalent. Caregiver treatment satisfaction was higher in parents who chose IAsp CSII pump therapy for their children.

A randomized prospective study of insulin pump vs. insulin injection therapy in very young children with type 1 diabetes: 12-month glycemic, BMI, and neurocognitive outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To compare glycemic control, body mass index (BMI), neurocognitive function, and parenting stress for preschool-aged diabetic children randomized to treatment either with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) or with intensive insulin injection therapy (IIT).

METHODS

Children <5 yr of age diagnosed with type 1 diabetes mellitus for at least 12 months were randomized to either CSII (n = 21) or IIT (n = 21) for 6 months. After 6 months, the IIT group began CSII therapy and the CSII group continued on pumps. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and BMI percent were collected at baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Neurocognitive assessments (Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration and Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale: Fourth Edition) were administered to children, and parenting and child behavior assessments (Parenting Stress Index and Child Behavior Checklist) were completed by parents and at baseline, 6, and 12 months.

RESULTS

Thirty-five children completed the study. Mean HbA1c decreased significantly over the study period (8.9% +/- 0.6 vs. 8.5% +/- 0.7, p = 0.006). Initiation of CSII resulted in an HbA1c decrease of 0.4% after 3 months (p = 0.002); however, in the CSII first group, the HbA1c at 12 months was not significantly different from study start (8.8% +/- 0.6 vs. 8.5% +/- 0.6; p = 0.4). There were no significant changes in BMI%, neurocognitive, parenting, and child behavior measures between groups.

CONCLUSION

Initiation of CSII vs. continuing IIT does not significantly influence HbA1c, BMI, neurocognitive, or parenting stress parameters in a research study setting.

Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion vs. multiple daily injections in children with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials

OBJECTIVE

To investigate potential effects of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) compared with multiple daily injections (MDI) on glycemic control in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM).

STUDY DESIGN

Meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized control studies (RCTs). The electronic databases MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE were searched through October 2007.

RESULTS

Six RCTs involving 165 participants with T1DM met our predefined inclusion criteria. Combined data from all trials showed that the CSII group compared with the MDI group experienced a significant reduction in the level of glycosylated hemoglobin. The pooled weighted mean difference (WMD) was -0.24% [95% confidence interval (95% CI) -0.41 to -0.07, p < 0.001] with a fixed model and remained significant in the random effect model. This effect was reached by slightly decreasing insulin requirement [three RCTs, n = 74, WMD -0.22 IU/kg/d (95% CI -0.31 to -0.14, p < 0.001)]. No differences in the incidences of ketoacidosis and severe hypoglycemic events were found.

CONCLUSIONS

In short-term insulin therapy, CSII compared with MDI is a more effective form of metabolic control and allows reducing the daily insulin requirement. Yet, no conclusions have been made so far whether this effect holds in later years. These results should be approached with caution because of the methodological limitations of the analyzed studies.

Treatment of diabetes mellitus using an external insulin pump in clinical practice

Before the initiation of insulin pump therapy, patients must be aware of the different aspects of this form of intensive insulin therapy. Most healthcare professionals recommend a sequential approach to inform patients about CSII. Factors that need to be considered in choosing an insulin pump include its safety features, durability of the device, tolerability and comfort of the catheter, user-friendliness, technical features and appearance. The initial insulin requirements need to be individualized for the given patient, using different methods to determine the appropriate dosages for the basal rate and prandial boluses. Glycaemic targets and algorithms for insulin dose adaptation need to be learned by the patients to enable them to avoid and/or correct hypo- and hyperglycaemia/ketosis episodes. Patients are also advised on how to carry out frequent self-monitoring of blood glucose-and of ketone bodies, if necessary. Insulin pumps are now able to deliver a range of basal rates and boluses that increase the flexibility of CSII. One specific issue is the approach to meal-planning, based on carbohydrate-counting or the equivalent: this method of so-called 'flexible insulin therapy' can improve metabolic control (for instance, by diminishing postprandial excursions) as well as the quality of life of patients. Evaluation of the knowledge and practices of the patient can be made through a continuous educational programme carried out by experienced nurses and physicians at the start of therapy and during follow-up. In addition, it may be necessary to identify the reasons for lack of improvement in metabolic control after several months of therapy, which include pump malfunction, cannula problems, miscalculated insulin dosages and insufficient metabolic control in specific clinical situations with a high risk of metabolic deterioration (illness, exercise, concomitant drugs). Annual assessment of the patient using an itemized checklist is required to verify the continued efficacy and safety of insulin pump therapy, two main factors of success with CSII treatment.

Treatment of diabetes mellitus using an external insulin pump: the state of the art

The aim of diabetes treatment is to achieve tight glucose control to avoid the development of chronic diabetic complications while reducing the frequency of hypoglycaemic episodes. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) using an external pump is an intensive diabetes therapy recognized to improve metabolic control and glycaemic instability, and to reduce the frequency of severe hypoglycaemia. For years, the theoretical advantages of the insulin pump (constancy of basal delivery, adjustable basal rates, and low insulin depots allowing the reduction of glycaemic variability) have contributed to its reported superiority compared with multiple daily injections (MDI). However, insulin pump therapy is now challenged by new MDI regimens based on long-acting insulin analogues that could replace the use of CSII. As a consequence, health professionals now have to determine which patients are likely to benefit the most from CSII. Recently, several studies reported that children and adolescents, and patients whose blood glucose imbalance was initially the most pronounced with basal-bolus regimens, would particularly benefit from CSII. Other indications were also proposed in marginal clinical situations with highly selected patients in whom a significant improvement of blood glucose was demonstrated. Finally, the use of CSII in type 2 diabetic patients now appears to be a good alternative to the ineffective MDI regimens observed in some of these patients. However, past experience with CSII indicates that candidates for insulin pump therapy must be carefully selected and strongly motivated to improve their glucose control. Use of CSII also requires strict medical supervision by physicians and a regular programme of patient education by paramedical teams, to ensure optimal responsible use of this technique by healthcare professionals.

Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) in children with type 1 diabetes

Recent studies have shown that continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII), or insulin pump therapy, provides a treatment option that can assist in the attainment of current goals of treatment in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1DM). In pediatric patients, CSII has been demonstrated to reduce both glycosylated hemoglobin levels and frequency of severe hypoglycemia, without sacrifices in safety, quality of life, or excessive weight gain, particularly in conjunction with the use of new insulin analogs and improvements in pump technology. Clinical studies of safety and efficacy of CSII in children are reviewed.

The renaissance of insulin pump treatment in childhood type 1 diabetes

Current goals for the treatment of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus include achieving near-normal blood sugar levels, minimizing the risk of hypoglycemia, optimizing quality of life, and preventing or delaying long-term microvascular and macrovascular complications. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII), or insulin pump therapy, provides a treatment option that can assist in the attainment of all of these goals in all ages of children. In pediatric patients, CSII has been demonstrated to reduce both glycosylated hemoglobin levels and frequency of severe hypoglycemia, without sacrifices in safety, quality of life, or weight gain, particularly in conjunction with the use of new insulin analogs and improvements in pump technology. Clinical studies of safety and efficacy of CSII in children are reviewed, as well as criteria for patient selection and practical considerations using pump therapy in youth with T1DM.

Hypoglycemia and ketoacidosis with insulin pump therapy in children and adolescents

This review deals with the two most serious side effects encountered with insulin pump therapy, severe hypoglycemia and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). Although clinical follow-up studies reported decreased rates of severe hypoglycemia, randomized studies have not confirmed this, showing no difference between the pump and injection groups. Less-severe hypoglycemia (mild/moderate/symptomatic hypoglycemia) was found to be more common with pump use. Some patients have inadvertently dosed or overdosed while awake or during sleep, causing fatal outcome in rare cases. Population-based or retrospective clinical studies reported a low rate of DKA in pump users that was still a higher rate than those using injection therapy, at least in some countries. In research settings and for patients with good compliance and adequate family support, the risk of DKA seems lower; many short-term studies report no DKA at all, possibly due to the increased attention given to participants. The use of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) seems to decrease the risk in patients who had recurrent DKA before pump start. Most episodes of DKA occur early after pump start, suggesting a learning curve occurs in all new forms of treatment. Increased teaching and awareness programs are vital to prevent severe hypoglycemia and DKA in children and adolescents using insulin pumps.

Emerging evidence for the use of insulin pump therapy in infants, toddlers, and preschool-aged children with type 1 diabetes

Insulin pump therapy has, within the last 10 years, emerged as an increasingly popular modality of treatment to achieve intensive glycemic targets in type 1 diabetes (T1D). The evidence for the benefits of pump therapy has been demonstrated in adults and adolescents; however, until recently there has been a paucity of studies examining the efficacy and safety in pump therapy in very young children. The purpose of this article is to discuss the rationale for insulin pump therapy in infants and toddlers, review the available studies of pump therapy in this population, and show that the data support the use of insulin pumps in our very youngest of patients.

Risk and benefits of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) treatment in school children and adolescents

Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) therapy with technically advanced modern insulin pumps is a treatment option enabling patients and multidisciplinary diabetes teams to achieve all current goals for the treatment of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM): near-normoglycemia, low rate of hypoglycemia, preventing or delaying long-term complications and increasing quality of life. Clinical studies demonstrate that CSII therapy reduces glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) with a concomitant decrease in the rate of hypoglycemic events, without excessive weight gain and with an increase of patients' treatment satisfaction in all pediatric age groups. With the development of continuous glucose sensing coupled with an insulin pump, patients can hope for an ever-increasing technological support for the management of insulin therapy in the foreseeable future.

Feasibility and safety of insulin pump therapy in children aged 2 to 7 years with type 1 diabetes: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Although insulin pump therapy has been successful in adults, adolescents and school children, its use has been limited in young children. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the glycemic control, safety and efficacy of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion via pump in young children (2-7 years old) with type 1 diabetes who were transitioned from twice-a-day insulin injection (neutral protamine Hagedorn/Lente + Humalog/Novalog) to insulin pump therapy. Hemoglobin A1c, BMI, average fasting blood glucose, episodes of severe hypoglycemia, episodes of diabetic ketoacidosis, episodes of lipohypertrophy, blood glucose variability, and number of sick day calls were compared before and after insulin pump therapy.

METHODS

Data were collected retrospectively by chart review over a 2-year period during quarterly diabetes clinic visits from 33 patients who were managed on neutral protamine Hagedorn/Lente + Humalog/Novolog twice-a-day injections for at least 1 year prior to transitioning to insulin pump therapy.

RESULTS

There was a significant improvement in the average hemoglobin A1c after continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion therapy. The average fasting blood sugar was lower in the continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion group. Severe episodes of hypoglycemia and episodes of lipohypertrophy were significantly higher before insulin pump therapy initiation. There were significantly fewer sick day calls after continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. Blood sugar variability improved significantly after insulin pump therapy. There was no significant difference in BMI or amount of carbohydrate consumed. None of the patients experienced diabetic ketoacidosis requiring emergency treatment before or after insulin pump therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Continous subcutaneous insulin infusion therapy in young children with type 1 diabetes is a safe, effective and superior alternative to a twice-a-day insulin regimen.

Insulin pumps in pediatric routine care improve long-term metabolic control without increasing the risk of hypoglycemia

Although continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) has been used in pediatric practice for >20 yr, the technique is not widely used in many countries. The aim of this non-randomized population-based study was to evaluate CSII in routine pediatric care. In a 1-yr cross-sectional evaluation, 27/89 patients (30.3%, age 7-21 yr) used pumps (two during the night only), the others 4-6 injections/day. In patients with >2 yr of diabetes, pump users had higher HbA1c (8.9+/-1.0 vs. 8.2+/-1.6%, p=0.04), less insulin/24 h (0.9+/-0.1 vs. 1.0+/-0.2 U/kg, p=0.002), and longer diabetes duration (p=0.02). The higher HbA1c is explained by 67% of pump patients having high HbA1c (>8.5%) as the major indication for CSII. The overall incidence of severe hypoglycemia was 31.5/100 patient years, 40.3 for injection therapy, and 11.1 for pump therapy (p=not significant). The incidence of severe hypoglycemia with unconsciousness was 12.9/100 patient years and with seizures 9.7 for injection therapy, whereas no children on pumps experienced these complications during the cross-sectional study year. We had no admissions for ketoacidosis in either group during this year. The pump patients were followed for 5 yr after pump start. Two stopped using the pump after 2 and 3 yr. For the patients with high HbA1c as indication, mean HbA1c the year before pump was 9.5%. Mean HbA1c during the first year with pump was lowered to 8.9% (p=0.019), the second year 8.6% (p=0.017), the third year 8.6 (p=0.012), the fourth year 8.7 (p=0.062), and the fifth year 8.9% (p=0.28). We found six cases of ketoacidosis corresponding to 4.7/100 patient years. In conclusion, we found a long-term lowering of HbA1c after starting CSII in a pediatric population, decreased frequency of severe hypoglycemia, and a low risk of ketoacidosis.

Long-acting insulin analogues (insulin glargine or determir) and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in the treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus in the paediatric population

Despite many improvements in the treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM1), the non-physiological time-action profiles of conventional insulins remain a significant obstacle. In recent years, recombinant DNA technology has been used to design insulin molecules that overcome the limitations of regular and NPH insulin. The rapid insulin analogs used as prandial and the long-acting insulin analogs used as basal simulate physiological insulin profiles more closely than the older conventional insulins. The efficacy of insulin analogs now available for multiple daily injection (MDI) and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) therapy in DM1 has been established in pediatric patients. Insulin pumps have improved since they were first introduced. CSII therapy may provide an effective alternative for selected pediatric patients with DM1. In most studies at pediatric age, CSII therapy resulted in a improvement in HbA1c, a decreased rate of hypoglycemia without an abnormal increase in BMI, and without adversely affecting psychosocial outcomes in children and adolescents with DM1.

Insulin pump treatment of childhood type 1 diabetes

Current goals for the treatment of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus include achieving near-normal blood sugar levels, minimizing the risk of hypoglycemia, optimizing quality of life, and preventing or delaying long-term microvascular complications. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) provides a treatment option that can assist in the attainment of all of these goals in all ages of children. Usage of CSII has been demonstrated to reduce glycosylated hemoglobin levels and frequency of severe hypoglycemia, without sacrifices in safety, quality of life, or weight gain, particularly in conjunction with the use of new insulin analogs and improvements in pump technology. Clinical studies of safety and efficacy of CSII in children are reviewed.

Insulin pump therapy in childhood diabetes mellitus: guidelines for use

The current goals for the therapy of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus are to achieve near-normal glycemia, minimize the risk of severe hypoglycemia, limit excessive weight gain while achieving adequate growth, improve quality of life for both the patients and their families, and delay or prevent vascular complications. Insulin pump therapy provides a treatment option that can significantly aid in achieving all of these goals across all age ranges of pediatric patients. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) pump therapy can provide greater flexibility in the timing of meals and snacks, has programmable basal rates to optimize overnight glycemic control, can reduce the risk of exercise-induced hypoglycemia, and enhances the ability of the patient and the family members to achieve acceptable diabetes control. In pediatric patients, CSII has been shown to reduce both glycosylated hemoglobin levels and the frequency of severe hypoglycemia without increasing the risk of diabetic ketoacidosis. The effectiveness of CSII, improvements in pump technology, and the availability of very rapid-acting insulin analogs have fueled a dramatic increase in the use of this therapy. This review presents practical guidelines for the selection of patients, initiation of treatment and patient education, as well as guidelines for use while exercising and at school. Keys to the success of CSII are to have a multidisciplinary team of clinicians who are expert in the care of children with diabetes, and patients and families who are able to carry out the tasks of intensive treatment, including self-monitoring of blood glucose levels, carbohydrate counting, and infusion pump management. Patients and parents need to be able to recognize and treat hypoglycemia, and prevent the development of ketoacidosis. School personnel need to be involved in the treatment plan and individual algorithms developed for periods of extra exercise and activity. The recent introduction of methods for continuous glucose monitoring provides a new means to optimize the basal and bolus capabilities of CSII and offers hope for the development of a feedback-controlled artificial pancreas.

A two-center randomized controlled feasibility trial of insulin pump therapy in young children with diabetes

OBJECTIVE

Our goals were to determine if continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII), compared with those continuing multiple daily injections (MDIs), can be safely used in young children, if those on CSII will have superior glycemic control, if subjects using CSII will have less hypoglycemia for their level of control, and if families using CSII will report an improved quality of life.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We conducted a randomized 1-year feasibility trial comparing CSII with continuing MDIs in preschool children with a history of type 1 diabetes for at least 6 months' duration. Prospective outcomes included measures of overall glycemic control (HbA1c and continuous glucose monitoring system), the incidence of severe hypoglycemia and diabetic ketoacidosis, the percent of glucose values below 3.9 mmol/l, and the parents' report of quality of life.

RESULTS

The 19 subjects' ages ranged from 1.7 to 6.1 (mean 3.6) years, duration of diabetes ranged from 0.6 to 2.6 (mean 1.4) years, and baseline HbA1c ranged from 6.7 to 9.6% (mean 7.9%). Seven subjects were male. Nine subjects were randomized to start CSII and 10 to continue on MDI. All baseline characteristics were well balanced. Overall metabolic control, diabetes quality of life, and the incidence of hypoglycemia were similar in the two groups. No subject had diabetic ketoacidosis, while one subject in each group had an episode of severe hypoglycemia. No CSII subject discontinued using the pump during or after the study.

CONCLUSIONS

CSII can be a safe and effective method to deliver insulin in young children.

Persistence of benefits of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in very young children with type 1 diabetes: a follow-up report

OBJECTIVE

Use of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) has increased dramatically in recent years, and pump therapy has been shown to be a safe and effective alternative to multiple daily injections in adults and older pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes. Its use in very young children, however, has been limited, although this group might be expected to benefit the most from CSII. The objective of this study was to analyze the CSII efficacy and safety data in very young children with type 1 diabetes from our Diabetes Clinic database.

METHODS

Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), severe hypoglycemia (SH), and ketoacidosis (DKA) in the year before CSII were compared with corresponding values during pump treatment in all children who started CSII before age 7.

RESULTS

Sixty-five children (mean age: 4.5 y at CSII initiation; range: 1.4-6.9 years; 28 girls; 3 black, 1 Hispanic) were analyzed for >162 patient-years of follow-up. Mean HbA(1c) (7.4 +/- 1.0 prepump) decreased to 7.0 +/- 0.9 after 12 months of CSII and continued to improve even after 4 years on CSII. The rate of SH was reduced by 53% (from 78 to 37/100 patient-years). Children who received daytime care from paid caregivers (n = 26) experienced significant reductions in HbA1c and hypoglycemia frequency. There were no episodes of DKA requiring emergency treatment in the year before CSII and 4 episodes (4 per 100 patient-years) after transition to pump.

CONCLUSIONS

CSII is a durable and effective means of optimizing glycemic control in very young patients with type 1 diabetes and may be superior to multiple daily injections in minimizing the risk of severe hypoglycemia in this age group. Employment of paid caregivers does not preclude safe and effective use of CSII.

Special management of insulin lispro in continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in young diabetic children: a randomized cross-over study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the safety, efficacy and management of insulin lispro (LP) with regular human insulin (RH) in young diabetic children treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII).

STUDY DESIGN

27 very young diabetic children (age 4.6 +/- 2.2 years) treated with CSII participated in an open-label, randomized cross-over multicenter study comparing 2 periods of 16 weeks of CSII with LP or RH.

RESULTS

Mean daily basal rate was significantly higher during the LP period (p = 0.04). No differences were seen in changes in HbA1c levels, number of hypoglycemic events, cutaneous infections and catheter occlusions. There was no significant difference between the two treatments for preprandial and postprandial glucose values, although prandial glucose excursions tended to be lower with LP (significant at dinner, p = 0.01). Mean blood glucose levels were significantly higher at 0.00 and 3.00 a.m. during LP therapy (p < 0.05). No episode of ketoacidosis occurred during LP treatment. More parents indicated that LP made their own and the child's daily life easier (p = 0.02) and preferred LP (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

LP in CSII therapy in children is safe, as effective as RH, improved postprandial excursions, met the needs of young children in their daily life well, and gained their parents' satisfaction and preference. However, a shorter duration of LP resulted in hyperglycemia during the first part of the night, which must be compensated for by increasing nocturnal basal rates during this time.

Insulin pump therapy: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a meta-analysis of the metabolic and psychosocial impact of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) therapy on adults, adolescents, and children.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Studies were identified and data regarding study design, year of publication, sample size, patient's age, diabetes duration, and duration of CSII therapy were collected. Means and SDs for glycohemoglobin, blood glucose, insulin dosages, and body weight for CSII and comparison conditions were subjected to meta-analytic procedures. Data regarding pump complications and psychosocial functioning were reviewed descriptively.

RESULTS

A total of 52 studies, consisting of 1,547 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. Results indicate that CSII therapy is associated with significant improvements in glycemic control (decreased glycohemoglobin and mean blood glucose). A descriptive review of potential complications of CSII use (e.g., hypoglycemia, diabetic ketoacidosis [DKA], pump malfunction, and site infections) suggests a decreased frequency of hypoglycemic episodes but an increased frequency of DKA in studies published before 1993.

CONCLUSIONS

CSII therapy is associated with improved glycemic control compared with traditional insulin therapies (conventional therapy and multiple daily injections) and does not appear to be associated with significant adverse outcomes. Additional studies are needed to further examine the relative risks of CSII therapy, including the potential psychosocial impact of this technologically advanced therapy.

Insulin pump therapy in toddlers and preschool children with type 1 diabetes mellitus

OBJECTIVE

To test whether glycemic control in young children could be achieved more effectively and safely by using continuous insulin infusions administered by insulin pumps.

STUDY DESIGN

We analyzed the effects of pump therapy in nine toddlers in whom type 1 diabetes developed between the ages of 10 and 40 months. After a mean of 13.7 months of therapy with multiple daily injections, patients were treated with insulin pumps for periods ranging from 7 to 19 months (mean, 12.7 months).

RESULTS

Before initiation of pump therapy, HbA1c levels averaged 9.5% +/- 0.4%, and patients had a mean of 0.52 episodes per month of severe hypoglycemia (uncontrolled shaking, inconsolable crying, disorientation, or seizures). After initiation of pump therapy, HbA1c levels declined to 7.9% +/- 0.3% (P <.001 vs prepump levels), and the incidence of severe hypoglycemia decreased to 0.09 episodes per month (P <.05). Normal linear growth and weight gain were maintained during pump therapy. There were no changes in the frequency of physician or emergency room visits for acute hyperglycemia or ketoacidosis. However, the frequency of parental contacts with health personnel declined by >80%, reflecting increasing parental confidence and independence in diabetic care. Subjective assessments revealed significant improvements in quality of life and high levels of satisfaction with pump therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Insulin pump therapy may provide an effective alternative for selected preschool children with type 1 diabetes.

Insulin pump therapy in the 21st century. Strategies for successful use in adults, adolescents, and children with diabetes

Intensive diabetes management can be achieved in adults, adolescents, and children with use of CSII. Compared with MDI, CSII has better insulin pharmacokinetics, less variability in insulin absorption, and decreased risk of hypoglycemia; it also offers patients greater flexibility in lifestyle. Careful adjustment of basal and bolus doses and close follow-up, including patient education, are vital to the success of CSII.

Insulin pump therapy in pediatrics: a therapeutic alternative to safely lower HbA1c levels across all age groups

OBJECTIVE

To examine the efficacy and safety of using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) therapy in a large group of patients 18 months to 18 yr from a single pediatric diabetes program.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

All patients < or = 18 yr of age starting on CSII from 1 January 1997 to 31 March 2000 at the Yale Children's Diabetes Program were included. Clinical data were collected prospectively before and during pump treatment. HbA1c was the primary efficacy outcome and rates of diabetes-related adverse events were the primary safety measures.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty-one children ranging in age from 18 months to 18 yr received CSII for an average of 32 +/- 9 months when data collection was closed on 31 October 2001, including 26 preschoolers (< 7 yr), 76 school-agers (7-11 yr) and 59 adolescents (12-18 yr). Mean HbA1c levels were 7.1% in the preschoolers, 7.8% in the school-agers and 8.1% in the adolescents prior to the start of CSII. There was a significant and consistent reduction in mean HbA1c levels after 12 months of CSII (to 6.5% in preschoolers, 7.3% in school-agers and 7.4% in adolescents, p < 0.02 vs. prepump) that was maintained at the most recent visit. Improved diabetes control was achieved with CSII without increasing daily insulin doses and in association with a decrease in the frequency of severe hypoglycemic events (p < 0.05 vs. prepump, all three age groups combined).

CONCLUSIONS

CSII is an effective alternative to injection therapy in a large pediatric diabetes clinic setting. Even very young patients can utilize CSII to safely lower HbA1c levels.

Insulin pump therapy in type 1 pediatric patients: now and into the year 2000

There are a number of medical conditions such as growth failure in children, pregnancy, lipid abnormalities, and early complications that are improved by the meticulous glycemic control that can be achieved with insulin pump therapy (CSII). By using an insulin pump, many patients with severe hypoglycemia, the dawn phenomenon, extremes of glycemic excursion, recurrent diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and hypoglycemia unawareness have amelioration of these problems. However, pump therapy involves problems such as weight gain, recurrent ketosis due to pump failure, infections, and risk of hypoglycemia. Owing to many developmental issues, young children may not be able to wear the pump without parental supervision. We have used the pump at night time only in these patients. This has allowed children of 7-10 years of age to benefit from improved nocturnal glycemia without the risk of pump therapy when they are without an adult to help. We have also used the pump in subjects with recurrent DKA and in our general patient population (mean age 13.6+/-3.9 years). In our pump cohort, CSII led to improvement in quality of life, knowledge, adherence, and responsibility. A reduction in hypoglycemia, DKA rate and mean HbA(1c) was associated with pump usage. For this to occur, however, pump education must be geared to the pediatric subject and his/her family. Education materials and tools help in learning how to use the pump and how to deal with the intricacies of basal and bolus dosing, and the effect of exercise, food and illness on diabetes management. The pump has improved since it was first introduced and these modifications have made it easier, more painless and less hazardous. With the development of continuous glucose sensors and implantable pumps, the next century will see pump therapy lead to the artificial pancreas.

Current status and future prospects of parenteral insulin regimens, strategies and delivery systems for diabetes treatment

A strong relationship between long term metabolic control and low frequency of chronic diabetes complications was shown in the Diabetes Control Complication Trial (DCCT). However, the subcutaneous intensive insulin therapy required to achieve the glycemic goals defined by the DCCT led to an unacceptable frequency of severe hypoglycemia and a significant weight gain. This limits the benefits of this therapy and excludes groups of patients such as young children, the elderly or hypoglycemia prone patients. The intensive therapy and self blood glucose monitoring (SMBG) necessary to limit hypoglycemia represent a heavy burden for the patients and their family. Improvements in parenteral insulin therapy are possible by either modifying subcutaneous insulin characteristics (analogs, adjunction of peptides such as amylin, GLP1, IGF1), or by developing better routes of administration and making SMBG easier, which is a key to intensive insulin therapy success. The ultimate goal remains the development of an automated, glucose controlled device.

Practical aspects of managing preschool children with type 1 diabetes

Day-to-day variations in diet and physical exercise, large variations in the glucose response to small changes in insulin doses, and high insulin sensitivity are characteristic of preschool children with diabetes. Hence, difficulties in achieving adequate metabolic control and stable glycaemia in preschool children are common. In addition, hypoglycaemic episodes tend to be frequent and severe in this age group. Problems identifying and treating hypoglycaemia present an additional challenge for the diabetes team and for the family caring for the young child with diabetes. Specific glucose targets are provided for this age group: premeal levels of 6-12 mmoll(-1)(110-220 mg dl(-1)) with bedtime levels above 8 mmoll(-1)(140 mg dl(-1)). It is important to note that children who suffer severe hypoglycaemic events at a young age show evidence of subtle cognitive deficits when tested during adolescence. The question of whether or not the years before pubertal onset contribute less towards the development of diabetes-related microvascular complications than do the years starting with the onset of puberty remains controversial. Twice-daily or multiple insulin injections, dietary adjustments and considerations, home blood-glucose monitoring, family education, support groups and 24-h hotline information facilities can help to achieve good metabolic control without severe hypoglycaemia in the preschool child. In general, good metabolic control without severe hypoglycaemia can be achieved using frequent counselling and a caring team approach.