Isolated axillary recurrences after conservative treatment of breast cancer

Favorable outcome of secondary axillary dissection in breast cancer patients with axillary nodal relapse

PURPOSE

Little evidence can be found about the long-term outcome of breast cancer patients after axillary lymph node recurrence (ALNR) and its survival benefit after different kinds of management. The present study intends to evaluate the risk factors associated with axillary recurrence after definite surgery for primary breast cancer. The prognosis after ALNR and particularly outcome of different management methods also were studied.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data from 4,473 patients who were diagnosed with primary breast cancer and received surgical intervention in a single institute from January 1990 to December 2002. Medical files were reviewed and data on survival were updated annually. Risk factors and prognosis of patients with axillary recurrence were analyzed. Breast-cancer-specific survival of patients with ALNR and outcomes after different management methods also were studied.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 70.2 months, axillary recurrence developed in 0.8% of patients. Factors associated with ALNR included: age younger than 40 years, medial tumor location, no initial standard level I & II axillary dissection, and not receiving hormonal therapy. The 5-year breast-cancer-specific survival after ALNR was 57.9%. For patients who received further axillary dissection, the 5-year survival rate was 82.5% compared with 44.9% for patients who did not receive further dissection.

CONCLUSIONS

ALNR is a rare event in treating breast cancer. Young age at diagnosis and medially located tumor are associated with higher risk, but standardized initial axillary dissection to level II and adjuvant hormonal therapy is protective against ALNR. In patients with ALNR, the outcome is not dismal and survival may be improved if further axillary dissection is given.

Regional nodal recurrence in breast cancer patients treated with conservative surgery and radiation therapy (BCS+RT)

PURPOSE

To review regional nodal (RN) management and identify predictors of RN relapse in patients treated with breast conserving surgery and radiation therapy (BCS+RT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with Stage I and II breast cancer (N = 1920) underwent BCS+RT from 1973 to 2003. Patients undergoing RN were treated with a median dose of 46 Gy. Patients undergoing axillary dissection (AXD, N = 1330) were treated to the breast alone if node-negative (N = 984), and to the breast and supraclavicular fossa if node-positive (N = 346). Patients who did not undergo AXD (N = 590) were treated with RT to the supraclavicular fossa and axilla. Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) was performed on 126 patients. SN-negative patients (N = 110) were treated with tangents only. There were 16 SN-positive patients who did not undergo complete AXD and were treated with RT.

RESULTS

As of September 2005, there have been 36 RN relapses for an actuarial nodal control rate (NCR) of 98% at 10 years. There was no difference in NCR between those undergoing AXD (NCR = 97.4%) and those receiving RT without AXD (NCR = 97.9%). In multivariate analysis, young age, non-Caucasian race, and pathologic nodal status correlated with increased risk of nodal relapse. Of the 126 patients undergoing SNB, there was only 1 nodal recurrence. None of the 16 SN-positive patients treated with RT without AXD had nodal failure.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing BCS+RT, both regional nodal irradiation and AXD (including SNB) resulted in equally high rates of regional nodal control. Nodal RT may also be an effective treatment for SN-positive patients.

Long-term prognosis of patients with axillary recurrence after axillary dissection for invasive breast cancer

AIM

To investigate the long-term prognosis of patients with axillary recurrence after axillary dissection for invasive breast cancer and describe the long-term survivors.

METHODS

Between 1984 and 1994, 4669 patients with invasive breast cancer underwent axillary dissection in eight community hospitals in the south-eastern part of The Netherlands. Using follow-up data of the population-based Eindhoven Cancer Registry, 59 patients with axillary recurrence were identified.

RESULTS

The median interval between treatment of the primary tumour and diagnosis of axillary recurrence was 2.6 years (range 0.3-10.7). The median length of follow-up after diagnosis of axillary recurrence was 11.1 years (5.7-15.6). Distant metastases occurred in 38 of the 59 patients. The 5- and 10-year distant recurrence-free survival rates were 39% (95% CI: 25-52%) and 29% (95% CI: 16-42%).

CONCLUSIONS

Axillary recurrence following axillary dissection is associated with a high rate of subsequent distant metastasis and poor overall prognosis but is not always a fatal event. Our results show that it is possible to cure about one-third of the patients.

Treatment of breast carcinoma in patients with clinically negative axillary lymph nodes using radiotherapy versus axillary dissection

BACKGROUND

The role of axillary lymph node dissection (AxD) for patients with breast carcinoma who have clinically negative lymph nodes (cN0) and undergo breast-conserving therapy has been controversial. If patients do not undergo AxD, then it is uncertain whether specific lymph node irradiation should be given. The authors compared the results obtained from patients w ho underwent AxD with the results from patients who received axillary irradiation (AxR) using one of two radiotherapy techniques.

METHODS

Patients with T1-T2cN0 breast carcinoma were treated from 1983 to 2002 with either AxD (80 patients) or AxR (1134 patients received tangential-field [2-field] irradiation, and 303 patients received 3-field irradiation). The median follow-up was 161 months for the AxD group and 66 months for the AxR group (55 months for patients who received tangential-field irradiation, and 122 months for patients who received 3-field irradiation).

RESULTS

One patient in the AxD group and 35 patients in the AxR group had axillary recurrences. The 10-year cumulative axillary recurrence rates were 1.3% and 4.6% for the AxD group and the AxR group, respectively (P = 0.21). For patients with T1 tumors, the 10-year overall survival rates for the two groups were 94.7% and 92.7%, respectively (P = 0.34); and, for patients with T2 tumors, the 10-year overall survival rates were 92.5% and 89.1%, respectively (P = 0.34). In the AxR group, the 5-year axillary recurrence rates were 2.5% for patients who received tangential-field irradiation and 1.7% for patients who received 3-field irradiation (P = 0.18), and the 5-year regional recurrence rates for the two groups were 4.8% and 2.4%, respectively (P = 0.048). On multivariate analysis, positive lymphovascular invasion, outer tumor location, and larger tumor size were significant risk factors for regional failure.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with cN0 breast carcinoma, AxD and AxR yielded the same overall survival rates. Most patients can be treated safely with tangential-field irradiation alone. Patients who are at increased risk of regional failure may benefit from three-field irradiation.

Intraoperative cytologic examination of breast sentinel lymph nodes: test utility and patient impact

The sentinel lymph node (SLN) procedure is a method for ascertaining the axillary lymph node status in patients with breast cancer. Intraoperative examination of the SLN may be important, because a positive result directs surgery to a complete axillary lymph node dissection. Intraoperative cytologic examination (IOCE) is a method of intraoperative evaluation, although little data are available regarding the sensitivity of the method with respect to tumor size and the size of the SLN metastasis. All SLN cases for the years 1997-2002 at Magee-Womens Hospital were tabulated for primary breast carcinoma size, IOCE result, final histologic result, and size of the SLN metastasis. All SLNs had IOCE with touch imprints. Scrape SLN preparations and frozen sections were strongly discouraged. There were 748 SLN cases comprising 1576 SLNs that had IOCE, and there were 247 true positive SLN cases comprising 522 SLNs. Of the 247 true positive SLN cases, 111 had a positive IOCE (111/247; 45% sensitivity overall) and there were 136 false negatives. Of the 247 cases, 164 were SLN micrometastases < or =2.0 mm in size, and 44 (27%) of these were detected by IOCE, while the remaining 120 cases were false negative. Of the 83 SLN macrometastases (>2.0 mm), 66 (80%) were detected by IOCE, with 17 false negatives. In this series, 15 cases (2%) were given the IOCE diagnosis of atypical/defer, and all of these permanent sections were histologically positive. There were five IOCE-positive cases that were histologically negative. Of the 164 SLNs with micrometastases < or =2.0 mm, 17.6% (29/164) were < or =0.5 mm (6/29 [21.4%] were IOCE positive), 5.5% (9/164) were 0.51-1.0 mm (3/9 [33%] were IOCE positive), and 3.6% (6/164) were 1.1-2.0 mm (2/6 [33%] were IOCE positive). There were 83 SLNs with macrometastases larger than 2.0 mm, and 66/83 (80%) were detected by IOCE. In this group, 22% (18/83) were 2.1-5.0 mm (8/18 [44.4%] were IOCE positive) and 57.8% (48/83) were larger than 5.0 mm (41/48 [85%] were IOCE positive). The mean primary breast tumor size was 15.4 mm, with a mean SLN tumor size of 1.4 mm. There was a significant correlation with tumor size and the presence of SLN metastasis, and a significant correlation with tumor size and size of the SLN metastasis. There was a significant t correlation of primary tumor size and positive IOCE, with the group of negative IOCE cases having a mean tumor size of 14 mm and the positive IOCE group having a mean tumor size of 22 mm. The overall sensitivity of the method was 45%, specificity 99%, positive predictive value 0.99, and negative predictive value 0.80. Sensitivity of the IOCE procedure based on SLN tumor size is as follows: < or =0.5 mm, 21.4%; 0.51-1.0 mm, 33%; 1.1-2.0 mm, 33%; 2.1-5.0 mm, 44.4%; and >5.0 mm, 85%. Primary tumor size correlates with a positive SLN status and size of the SLN metastasis. Most false-negative IOCEs are due to micrometastases. Positive IOCE cases had a significantly larger SLN metastasis size (mean 8.0 mm) than the false-negative IOCE group (mean 1.4 mm). The IOCE of SLNs has a high negative predictive value, but this is a poor test for the detection of micrometastases, as this group accounts for the majority of false-negative IOCEs of breast SLNs.

Breast-conserving therapy in young women with invasive carcinoma of the breast

Higher local recurrence rates have been reported in young women with invasive carcinoma of the breast treated with breast-conserving therapy (BCT). However, age itself may not be responsible for this increased risk of recurrence. To investigate this further, a computerized literature search of MEDLINE was performed using data from 1996 to May 2003. The research was limited to female patients with localized, invasive adenocarcinoma of the breast but also included patients of young age with ductal carcinoma in situ. Women of young age with breast cancer, treated with BCT are at an increased risk of recurrence ranging from 7.5 to 35%. However, the data would suggest that the increased risk is secondary to the association of young age with more aggressive tumours and a positive family history of breast cancer. Other factors that may explain the adverse prognosis in women of a young age include associated genetic abnormalities and the lack of mammographic screening programmes for women of young age. Young age is a risk factor for breast recurrence after BCT. However, management decisions should be based on tumour stage, grade and other related prognostic features rather than on young age alone.

Axillary treatment in conservative management of operable breast cancer: dissection or radiotherapy? Results of a randomized study with 15 years of follow-up

PURPOSE

Axillary dissection is the standard management of the axilla in invasive breast carcinoma. This surgery is responsible for functional sequelae and some options are considered, including axillary radiotherapy. In 1992, we published the initial results of a prospective randomized trial comparing lumpectomy plus axillary radiotherapy versus lumpectomy plus axillary dissection. We present an update of this study with a median follow-up of 180 months (range, 12 to 221 months).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1982 and 1987, 658 patients with a breast carcinoma less than 3 cm in diameter and clinically uninvolved lymph nodes were randomly assigned to axillary dissection or axillary radiotherapy. All patients underwent wide excision of the tumor and breast irradiation.

RESULTS

The two groups were similar for age, tumor-node-metastasis system stage, and presence of hormonal receptors; 21% of the patients in the axillary dissection group were node-positive. Our initial results showed an increased survival rate in the axillary dissection group at 5 years (P =.009). At 10 and 15 years, however, survival rates were identical in both groups (73.8% v 75.5% at 15 years). Recurrences in the axillary node were less frequent in the axillary dissection group at 15 years (1% v 3%; P =.04). There was no difference in recurrence rates in the breast or supraclavicular and distant metastases between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

In early breast cancers with clinically uninvolved lymph nodes, our findings show that long-term survival does not differ after axillary radiotherapy and axillary dissection. The only difference is a better axillary control in the group with axillary dissection.

Intraoperative imprint cytologic evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes for lobular carcinoma of the breast

BACKGROUND

The evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) from a woman with lobular cancer of the breast is frequently challenging. Intraoperative imprint cytology (IIC) is equivalent to frozen sectioning for rapid SLN evaluation and is advantageous because it is rapid, reliable, cost-effective, and conserves tissue. Metastatic lobular carcinoma is difficult to identify in SLN because of its low-grade cytomorphology, its tendency to infiltrate lymph nodes in a single cell pattern, and because individual cells can resemble lymphocytes. We are unaware of any large published studies, using any technique, to evaluate SLN for lobular carcinoma.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the intraoperative imprint cytology results of 678 SLN mapping procedures for breast carcinoma was performed. From this cohort, we studied SLN from cases of lobular carcinoma. These SLN were evaluated intraoperatively by either bisecting or slicing the SLN into 4-mm sections. Imprints were made of each cut surface and stained with hematoxylin and eosin and/or Diff-Quik. Permanent sections were evaluated with up to 4 hematoxylin and eosin-stained levels and cytokeratin immunohistochemistry. IIC results were compared with final histologic results.

RESULTS

Sixty-one cases of pure invasive lobular carcinoma were identified. Sensitivity was 52%, specificity was 100%, accuracy was 82%, negative predictive value was 78%. No statistically significant differences in sensitivity, specificity or accuracy were identified for the intraoperative detection of lobular carcinoma versus ductal carcinoma. The sensitivity for detecting macrometastases (more than 2 mm) was better than for detecting micrometastases, 73 versus 25%, respectively (P = 0.059).

CONCLUSIONS

The sensitivity and specificity of IIC are similar to that of intraoperative frozen section evaluation. Therefore, IIC is a viable alternative to frozen sectioning when intraoperative evaluation is required. If SLN micrometastasis is used to determine the need for further lymphadenectomy, more sensitive intraoperative methods will be needed to avoid a second operation.

Usefulness of a solid-state gamma camera for sentinel node identification in patients with breast cancer

BACKGROUND

A solid-state gamma camera was recently developed. This tool may enable intra-operative imaging of sentinel nodes in breast cancer. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the usefulness of a solid-state gamma camera for the pre- and intra-operative identification of sentinel nodes in patients with breast cancer.

METHODS

Breast cancer patients with clinically negative nodes underwent sentinel node biopsy using dye and radioisotopes. Lymphoscintigraphy using both the conventional Anger camera and the solid-state gamma camera was performed the day before surgery. Sentinel nodes were intra-operatively identified using the gamma probe and imaged with a solid-state gamma camera, and then excised. When several sentinel nodes were present, these steps were repeated.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients (30 basins) were enrolled in the study. The mean patient age was 54 years and the mean tumor size was 16 mm. A total of 41 sentinel nodes were identified using the Anger camera or the solid-state gamma camera pre-operatively. Thirty-eight sentinel nodes (92.7%) were identified using both the Anger camera and the solid-state gamma camera, 1 sentinel node (2.4%) was identified using the Anger camera alone, and 2 sentinel nodes (4.9%) were identified using the solid-state gamma camera alone. A total of 63 sentinel nodes were identified using the gamma probe or the solid-state gamma camera intra-operatively, and were excised. Fifty-seven sentinel nodes (90.5%) were identified using both the gamma probe and the solid-state gamma camera, 3 sentinel nodes (4.8%) were identified using the gamma probe alone, and 3 sentinel nodes (4.8%) were identified using the solid-state gamma camera alone.

CONCLUSIONS

The solid-state gamma camera is useful for pre- and intra-operative identification of sentinel nodes in breast cancer. The significance of the solid-state gamma camera could be that it compensates for the gamma probe when the gamma probe cannot identify some sentinel nodes because of the shine through effect, and avoids leaving the residual sentinel nodes behind the axilla intra-operatively.

Intradermal radioisotope injection is superior to subdermal injection for the identification of the sentinel node in breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate whether the intradermal injection of radiocolloids would improve the identification rate of sentinel nodes over the subdermal injection in breast cancer patients.

METHODS

Sentinel node biopsy was performed in T2 breast cancer patients with clinically negative nodes, using subdermal or intradermal injection of radioisotopes with the peritumoral dye injection. We used Tc-99m tin colloid, with a larger particle size (0.4-5 microm), rather than sulfur colloid and colloidal albumin.

RESULTS

The initial 55 patients underwent subdermal injection of radiocolloids; the next 61 patients underwent intradermal injection of radiocolloids for sentinel node biopsy. The detection rate of sentinel nodes was significantly (P = 0.048) higher in the intradermal injection group (61/61, 100%) than in the subdermal injection group (51/55, 92.7%). False-negative rates were comparable between the two groups. Lymphoscintigraphy visualized the sentinel nodes significantly (P < 0.0001) more often in the intradermal injection group (59/61, 96.7%) than in the subdermal injection group (20/54, 37.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

A significantly higher identification rate of sentinel node biopsy and lymphoscintigraphy can be achieved by intradermal injection of Tc-99m tin colloid with a large particle size than by subdermal injection.

Outcomes After Localized Axillary Node Recurrence in Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

Localized axillary recurrence (LAR) is an uncommon event. It is estimated to occur in 0.5% to 3% of patients when adequate axillary surgery has been performed. Although relatively sparse data exist on the outcome of patients with LAR, in the era of sentinel node biopsy (SNB) these data may have increased relevance. This study assesses the survival outcomes in these patients.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was completed. Patient age, tumor size, pathology, receptor status, and treatment of the primary breast carcinoma were reviewed. Axillary recurrence, treatment, and overall survival data were collected.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients were identified with LAR that developed at a median of 77 months after their initial dissection. At the time of treatment for their LAR, all patients had completion axillary clearance and six also had a concurrent completion mastectomy. Further adjuvant treatment was individualized. Five patients (33%) have died, including all patients (3) who developed a LAR within 2 years of their initial breast cancer presentation. Ten-year overall survival is 56%.

CONCLUSION

Our experience suggests early (<24 months) LAR is indicative of a poor prognosis. With multimodal treatment, ten-year overall survival is 56%.

Will we need lymph node dissection at all in the future?

Traditionally in the treatment of primary breast cancer, axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) plays an important role. However, a substantial and increasing percentage of patients appear to have no nodal involvement and have been subjected to ALND unnecessarily. The first reason to perform an ALND is axillary nodal staging. After reviewing the literature, it can be concluded that in clinically node-negative patients an adequately conducted lymphatic mapping by sentinel node procedure is equal to ALND for this purpose. The second reason to perform an ALND is to establish the extent of nodal involvement, which might have an impact on adjuvant treatment recommendations. However, there is no evidence available that patients with extensive nodal involvement (= 4 positive nodes) benefit more from adjuvant systemic treatment (either standard or high dose) in terms of reduction of odds of recurrence and mortality compared to patients with limited nodal involvement and optimally administered so-called standard adjuvant treatment. The third reason to perform an ALND is to ensure axillary tumor control. Reviewing the different treatment options, it can be concluded that in clinically node-negative patients axillary control after axillary radiotherapy appears to be similar to axillary control after ALND. In clinically overt axillary involvement, ALND (with or without adjuvant radiotherapy) may result in an improved regional control. In the near future, ALND will not be the standard of care but will be reserved for those patients with proven axillary lymph node involvement. In microscopic disease, radiotherapy may be an alternative with equal control and less morbidity.

Intraoperative evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes for breast carcinoma: current methodologies

Sentinel lymph node biopsy is an important new addition to the surgical management of patients with breast carcinoma. Sentinel nodes have a higher chance of containing metastases than do nonsentinel nodes. Sentinel lymph node biopsy provides an opportunity to stage breast carcinoma patients more accurately and to modify subsequent treatment. One of the most exciting current roles of sentinel lymph node biopsy is the ability to stage patients intraoperatively, allowing a one-step axillary lymph node dissection if the sentinel lymph node contains metastatic carcinoma. Currently, intraoperative evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes is performed using imprint cytology with or without rapid cytokeratin staining, frozen sectioning with or without rapid cytokeratin staining, scrape preparations, or some combination of these techniques. We review the relative strengths and weaknesses of these different methodologies. A great deal of controversy exists regarding the management of patients with metastatic breast carcinoma, particularly those patients with occult and micrometastatic disease. These issues are beyond the scope of this article.

Consequences of axillary recurrence after conservative breast surgery

BACKGROUND

The aim was to study the incidence, time course and prognosis of patients who developed axillary recurrence after breast-conserving surgery, and to evaluate possible risk factors for axillary recurrence and prognostic factors after axillary recurrence.

METHODS

In a population-based cohort of 6613 women with invasive breast cancer who had breast-conserving surgery between 1981 and 1990, 92 recurrences in the ipsilateral axilla were identified. Risk factors for axillary recurrence were studied in a case-control study nested in the cohort, and late survival was documented in the women with axillary recurrence.

RESULTS

The overall risk of axillary recurrence was 1.0 per cent at 5 years and 1.7 per cent at 10 years. The risk of axillary recurrence increased with tumour size (P = 0.033) and was highest in younger women (odds ratio (OR) 3.9 for women aged less than 40 years compared with those aged 50-59 years). Radiotherapy to the breast reduced the risk of axillary recurrence (OR 0.1 (95 per cent confidence interval 0.1 to 0.4)). The breast cancer-specific survival rate after axillary recurrence, as measured from primary treatment, was 78.0 per cent at 5 years and 52.3 per cent at 10 years. Tumour size and node status had a statistically significant effect on death from breast cancer.

CONCLUSION

Axillary recurrence is rare, although more common in younger women with large tumours. Radiotherapy to the breast was protective. Tumour size and node status were the most important prognostic factors in women with axillary recurrence.

Determinants of axillary recurrence after axillary lymph node dissection for invasive breast cancer

AIM

This study was undertaken to gain insight into the risk factors for axillary recurrence among patients with invasive breast cancer who underwent breast-conserving treatment or mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection.

METHODS

In a matched case-control design, 59 patients with axillary recurrence and 295 randomly selected control patients without axillary recurrence were compared. Matching factors included age, year of incidence of the primary tumour and postsurgical axillary nodal status.

RESULTS

For patients with negative axillary lymph nodes, those with a tumour in the medial part of the breast had a 73% (95% CI: 4-92%) lower risk of axillary recurrence compared to those with a tumour in the lateral part of the breast. For the patients with positive axillary lymph nodes the risk of axillary recurrence was 65% (95% CI: 16-86%) lower for those who had received axillary irradiation compared to those without axillary irradiation. Within the age group <50 years, the risk or axillary recurrence was 82% lower (95% CI: 45-94%) for patients with more than six lymph nodes found in the axillary specimen compared to those with six or less than six lymph nodes.

CONCLUSIONS

Although based on a small number of patients, this study indicates that axillary irradiation is effective in reducing the risk of axillary recurrence for patients with positive lymph nodes. This favourable effect only applies to the subgroup with extranodal extension or nodal involvement in the apex of the axilla, as these were the only patients receiving axillary radiation during the study period.

Aichi Cancer Center 10-year experience with conservative breast treatment of early breast cancer: retrospective analysis regarding failure patterns and factors influencing local control

PURPOSE

We analyzed the clinical results of conservative breast therapy in our institute to determine the risk factors influencing local and distant disease recurrence.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From 1989 to 1997, 301 breasts of 295 women with early breast cancer were treated with conservative surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy. There were 212 incidences of Stage I breast cancer, and 89 of Stage II. Patients were routinely treated with local resection, axillar dissection, and 46--50 Gy irradiation given in 23--25 fractions. Some also received a radiation boost to the tumor bed.

RESULTS

The 5-/8-year overall survival, disease-free survival, and local control rates were 93.2/91.5%, 86.0/80.6%, and 95.1/92.5%, respectively. Using both univariate and multivariate analyses, tumor volume, estrogen receptor status, and age < 40 years were significant prognostic factors for disease-free survival. Both age < 40 years and surgical method had a strong effect on local control by uni- and multivariate analysis. Surgical margin status was a significant prognostic factor for local control at the univariate level (p < 0.0001), though it had only borderline significance at the multivariate level (p = 0.08). No patient experienced severe morbidity due to radiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

The results obtained are comparable to previously reported data. Although the follow-up period was too short to draw definite conclusions about long-term outcomes, the outcome from conservative breast treatment was acceptable.

Does treatment at the time of locoregional failure of breast cancer alter prognosis?

Locoregional recurrence (LRR) after therapy for early breast cancer is common. Patients with LRR can suffer local consequences such as bleeding, ulceration, pain and arm oedema or symptoms of metastases. Unlike existing treatment guidelines for primary tumours, both local (surgical and radiation) and systemic treatment recommendations are less well defined after LRR. The purpose of this review was to assess whether or not treatment at the time of locoregional failure ultimately alters a patient's prognosis. Unfortunately, the data from both retrospective and prospective studies are inconclusive and therefore the treatment of patients with LRR will continue to be recommended using guidelines similar to those for primary breast cancer. Future studies of factors predicting LRR and metastatic spread may allow better prognostication of patients with LRR which may in turn effect both local and systemic treatment decisions.

Locoregionally recurrent breast cancer: incidence, risk factors and survival

Locoregional recurrence (LRR) after therapy for early breast cancer is common. Patients with LRR can suffer both local consequences and symptoms of metastatic disease, as LRR is an independent predictor of subsequent distant metastases. Much of the available data on LRR is derived from small, single institution, retrospective studies, so marked differences in the incidence rates for LRR, it's risk factors and subsequent systemic recurrence are reported. The purpose of this review was to try and collate this data in a format that would be useful for both clinicians and their patients.

Combination technique is superior to dye alone in identification of the sentinel node in breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate whether the combination of dye and radioisotope would improve the detection rate of sentinel nodes (SN) and the diagnostic accuracy of axillary lymph node status over dye alone in patients with breast cancer.

METHODS

Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) was performed in stages I or II breast cancer patients with clinically negative nodes using dye alone (indocyanine green) or a combination of dye and radioisotope (99mTc-radiolabelled tin colloid).

RESULTS

SNB guided by dye alone was performed in 93 patients and SNB guided by a combination of dye and radioisotope was performed in 138 patients. The detection rate of SN was significantly (P = 0.006) higher in the combination group (94.9%) than in the dye alone group (83.9%). The sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of SNB in the diagnosis of axillary lymph node status were 100, 100, and 100%, respectively, for the combination group, and 81.0, 100, and 94.9%, respectively, for the dye alone group. There were no false negatives in the combination group, but four false negatives (19.0%) in the dye alone group. The combination method was significantly superior to the dye alone method for sensitivity (P = 0.011) and accuracy (P = 0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of a radioisotope to the dye in SNB increases the detection rate of SNs in breast cancer patients, and SNs detected by the combination method predict the axillary lymph node status with greater accuracy than those detected by the dye alone method.

Detection, treatment and outcome of axillary recurrence after axillary clearance for invasive breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim was to gain insight into the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of axillary recurrence after axillary clearance for invasive breast cancer in a large patient series.

METHODS

Between 1984 and 1994, 4669 patients with invasive breast cancer underwent axillary clearance in eight community hospitals in the south-eastern part of the Netherlands. Using follow-up data in a population-based cancer registry, 59 patients with axillary recurrence were identified.

RESULTS

The median interval between treatment of the primary tumour and the diagnosis of axillary recurrence was 2.6 (range 0.3-10.7) years. In 51 patients (86 per cent), axillary recurrence was found by palpation during routine follow-up. Surgery was part of the treatment of recurrence for 41 of 59 patients. Regional control (complete eradication of axillary recurrence) was achieved in 34 patients (58 per cent). The 5-year actuarial survival rate was 39 (95 per cent confidence interval 25-53) per cent. Patients with negative axillary lymph nodes at the time of diagnosis of the primary tumour and complete eradication of axillary recurrence had the best prognosis.

CONCLUSION

Patients with axillary recurrence had a poor prognosis, except when complete eradication was achieved and axillary lymph nodes were negative at the time of diagnosis of the primary tumour.

Prevalence and aetiology of lymphoedema after breast cancer treatment in southern Tasmania

BACKGROUND

Lymphoedema can be a devastating complication of surgical treatment for breast cancer. There is a lack of research on its prevalence in Australia which has hindered the development of measures to combat the condition. The aims of this study were to establish the prevalence and investigate the aetiology of upper limb lymphoedema in women treated for breast cancer in the years 1994-1996 in southern Tasmania.

METHODS

A standard volumetric water displacement technique was used to measure the arms of 201 women. A subjective assessment of swelling was also made by each patient. Factors analysed for statistical association with lymphoedema were: patient characteristics, type of treatment and tumour, and lymph node pathology.

RESULTS

The overall objective prevalence rate, regardless of treatment type, was 11%; whereas, the subjective rate was 23.4%. The objective prevalence for procedures involving axillary surgery was 14.2%. Significant statistical associations were found between arm size and body mass index at time of assessment (r = 0.15, P = 0.04); type of surgery (Chi-squared test = 11.06, P = 0.05); surgery to axilla (U = 2515.5, P = 0.002); tumour size (r = 0.17, P = 0.03); and tumour grade (Chi-squared test = 6.5 1, P = 0.04). No significant relationship was found between lymphoedema and axillary irradiation, number of lymph nodes removed, age or handedness of the patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Women receiving axillary dissection as part of their breast cancer treatment carry a significant risk of developing lymphoedema, regardless of the extent of surgery. The causative role of axillary irradiation was not supported. Future research should concentrate on less invasive alternatives to axillary dissection, such as sentinal lymph node biopsy.

Intraoperative sentinel lymph node examination by imprint cytology and frozen sectioning during breast surgery

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the usefulness of intraoperative imprint cytology and frozen sectioning of sentinel lymph nodes in patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer.

METHODS

Sentinel node biopsy was performed in 101 patients with stage I or II breast cancer with clinically negative nodes using a dye-guided method. Intraoperative evaluation of sentinel node involvement by imprint cytology and frozen sectioning was compared with the final histopathological results of permanent sections. Tumour-negative nodes in paraffin sections stained by haematoxylin and eosin were further studied using an anticytokeratin antibody.

RESULTS

The results of imprint cytology and frozen-section analysis were compared with those of haematoxylin and eosin-stained sections. The sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracy of imprint cytology were 96.0, 90.8 and 92.1 per cent respectively, and those of frozen-section examination were 52.0, 100 and 88.1 per cent. Ten sentinel nodes were tumour positive on imprint cytology and tumour negative on stained paraffin sections. Micrometastasis was found in eight of these nodes on immunohistochemistry. Taking these immunohistological results into consideration, the final sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracy of imprint cytology were 90.9, 98.5 and 96.0 per cent respectively.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative imprint cytology is a useful method for evaluating the status of sentinel nodes and is more accurate than frozen-section analysis. In addition, imprint cytology can detect micrometastasis more accurately than conventional haematoxylin and eosin-stained sectioning.

Primary axillary radiotherapy as axillary treatment in breast-conserving therapy for patients with breast carcinoma and clinically negative axillary lymph nodes

BACKGROUND

The objective of the current study was to evaluate the effectiveness and morbidity of primary axillary radiotherapy in breast-conserving therapy for postmenopausal, clinically axillary lymph node negative patients with early stage breast carcinoma.

METHODS

Between 1983-1997, 105 patients with clinically negative axillary lymph nodes and breast carcinoma were treated with wide local excision followed by radiotherapy to the breast, and axillary and supraclavicular lymph node areas. Adjuvant treatment with tamoxifen was given to 75 patients. The median follow-up of patients still alive was 41 months (range, 8-137 months). Fifty-five patients with no evidence of disease at last follow-up were examined prospectively with respect to late functional damage.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 64 years. Three patients developed a local recurrence. No isolated axillary lymph node recurrence was observed. In two patients, axillary recurrence was accompanied by distant metastases. The 5-year disease free interval and the overall survival were 82% (standard error [SE], 6%) and 83% (SE, 6%), respectively. In five patients, arm edema was reported and impaired shoulder function was reported in seven patients. Prospectively scored, arm edema was reported subjectively by the patient in 4% and objectively measured in 11% of cases. Impaired shoulder function was reported subjectively in 35% and objectively measured in 17% of cases. No brachial plexus neuropathy was noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary axillary radiotherapy for postmenopausal women with clinically lymph node negative, early stage breast carcinoma was found to result in low axillary lymph node recurrence rates with only limited late complications. Therefore, primary axillary radiotherapy should be considered as axillary treatment in selected patients as an alternative to axillary lymph node dissection.

Sentinel Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer

Axillary lymphnode dissection (ALND) for breast cancer patients provides local control and information for the determination of the type of adjuvant therapy.The benefit of axillary surgery itself for survival is considered to be limitedto patients with positive nodes. Sentinel node biopsy is a recently developed, minimally invasive technique for precisely predicting axillary nodal status. As this technique has less morbidity and greater accuracy than ALND, it replaces ALND for patients with node negative breast cancer. In this report, we outline thecurrent status of sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer patients and introduceour preliminary results.

Postmastectomy radiation therapy: A surgical perspective

Controversy exists about whether postmastectomy radiotherapy prolongs survival or is merely of benefit to maintain local control. Surgical series of patients treated by radical or modified radical mastectomy alone show locoregional failure rates ranging from 4% to 26%. The likelihood of involvement of supraclavicular and internal mammary nodal metastases increases as the extent of axillary nodal involvement increases. Adjuvant systemic therapy appears to have limited impact on the incidence of locoregional failure. Untreated nodal disease is a potential source of tumor dissemination and provides a biological rationale for a survival benefit for irradiation.

Diagnostic thoracic-computed tomography in radiotherapy for loco-regional recurrent breast carcinoma

PURPOSE

This study was initiated to evaluate whether pretreatment diagnostic thoracic CT scan was useful for patients with loco-regional recurrent breast carcinoma, and to assess its impact on the design of radiotherapeutic treatment.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between March 1991 and January 1997, 44 patients underwent thoracic CT examination with contrast material before the consideration of radiotherapy for their isolated loco-regional recurrent breast carcinoma. The CT radiographs were prospectively reviewed for additional findings clinically undetected by prior physical examination and plain-chest radiograph. The changes made in treatment design and dosage of radiation as a result of CT findings were recorded for analysis. The correlation between prognostic indicators and the CT findings was also studied.

RESULTS

Twenty-two of 44 (50%) patients were found to have additional abnormalities detected only after thoracic CT examinations were performed. The strategy of radiation therapy was altered in 17 of 22 (77%) patients as a result. Patients with shorter disease-free interval (p = 0.08) and multiple sites of recurrence (p = 0.05) tended to have greater numbers of findings on CT scan previously unsuspected. Thus, CT scan is a valuable guide to treating loco-regional recurrent disease.

CONCLUSION

Pretreatment diagnostic thoracic CT scan offers essential information that can alter treatment planning and thus optimize treatment strategy for a large proportion of patients with clinically isolated loco-regional recurrent breast carcinoma. In this population of patients we recommend that thoracic CT examination be considered before the initiation of radiation therapy.

[Evaluating the risk of axillary lymph node involvement in inferior breast cancer measuring 3 centimeters. Analysis of a predictive model based on 893 cases]

STUDY AIM

The aim of the study was to assess, by clinical and histological predictive factors, the axillary lymph-node involvement (pN+) in early breast cancers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eight hundred ninety-three patients with unilateral invasive breast cancer were studied. The evaluated parameters included clinical size (T), pathological size (pT), histological subtype (ductal infiltrating, according to grading 1, 2, 3, lobular infiltrating and others), age (less than 40, 40 to 60 and above 60). Furthermore, a new parameter, the dosimetric breast size, recently described, was included (Eur J Cancer 1997; 33: 2432-4).

RESULTS

The global rate of pN+ was 25.3%, with respectively, pN1: 10%, pN2-3: 8.4% and pN > 3: 6.9%. According to T, the pN+ rates were, respectively, 13.8%, 19.8% and 36.2% in the T0, T1 and T2 < or = 3 cm groups. According to pT, the pN+ rates were, respectively, 11.1%, 17.7%, 23.5%, 30.1% and 36% in the following groups: 0-9.9 mm, 10-14.9 mm, 15-19.9 mm, 20-24.9 mm and 25-29.9 mm. For the ductal infiltrating carcinoma, according to the gradings 1, 2 and 3, we found, respectively, 18.3%, 27.2% and 37.8% of pN+. For the lobular infiltrating carcinoma and the other histological subtypes, the rates were 22.7% and 10%, respectively. For the three age categories cited above the pN+ rates were, respectively, 30.3%, 25.8% and 22.4%. According to breast size we found 30.1% and 24.4% of pN+ respectively for small and medium or large dosimetric breast size. After a multivariate analysis, three factors were significant for pN+ risk: clinical tumor size (P = 0.0001), histological subtype (P = 0.0005) and dosimetric breast size (P = 0.004). With a combination of these three factors, the pN+ rates varied from 5% to 50%.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors conclude that both clinical and pathological characteristics of the primary tumor (specified by previous core biopsy) can indicate the risk for axillary node metastases, and allow selection of candidates for limited axilla surgery (sentinel node).

Pattern of dissemination and survival following isolated locoregional recurrence of breast cancer. A prospective study with more than 10 years of follow up

PURPOSES

The study evaluated prognostic factors for dissemination and survival in patients with local or regional recurrence of breast cancer. Furthermore, the aim was to define subgroups of patients at different risk of developing metastases in specific anatomical sites.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study included 140 patients with isolated local or regional node recurrence, who entered a prospective study for staging of patients with first recurrence of breast cancer in the period 1983-85. The primary treatment was a simple mastectomy; node positive patients received adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy or tamoxifen. If possible, the locoregional recurrence was treated with surgery and/or radiotherapy, otherwise by systemic therapy.

RESULTS

Median follow up was 10.4 years; 78 patients developed distant metastases (soft tissue, 32%; bone, 45%; viscera 40%). Median time to dissemination was 4.4 years, and the ten year dissemination rate was 72%. Median time to dissemination was 3.7 years for patients with recurrence in the regional nodes compared to 6.5 years for patients with chest wall recurrence only, p = 0.05. No specific time sequence (temporal pattern) was observed in the anatomical distribution of metastases, and the anatomical site of recurrence could not be predicted by any of the prognostic factors. At follow up, 93 patients had died. The median survival was 5.6 years and 30% were alive after 10 years. Forty-three of the 99 patients who received local therapy only did not develop metastases. Fifteen of these patients died without evidence of metastatic disease while 28 patients were still alive without distant recurrence after a median follow up time of 9.3 years (range, 6.5-11.9 years). Level of LDH and the number of positive regional nodes (NPOS) at primary diagnosis were significant independent prognostic factors for survival after recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately one third of the patients receiving local treatment only, were alive and without distant metastases up to ten years after locoregional recurrence, indicating that there is a subset of patients which may be long term survivors after local treatment only (surgery or radiotherapy). The duration of survival can be estimated by LDH and NPOS, but the model needs validation in a separate data set before clinical use.